Legal Research Methods

Legal Research Methods
Teaching Material
Prepared by:
Prof (Dr) Khushal Vibhute
&
Filipos Aynalem
Prepared under the Sponsorship of the Justice and Legal System
Research Institute
2009
chilot.wordpress.com

i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNIT 1: INTRODUCTION-------------------------------------------------------------------1
1.1 Introduction--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2
1.2 Law and Society: Mutual Relationship & Interaction-----------------------------------------------------3
1.3 Legal System: A System of Norms and Social System?---------------------------------------------------4
1.4 Role of Law in A Planned Socio-Economic Development------------------------------------------------6
UNIT 2: LEGAL RESEARCH: AN INTRODUCTION----------------------------------8
2.1 What is research?-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10
2.1.1 Meaning of research---------------------------------------------------------------------------------10
2.1.2 Objectives of research-------------------------------------------------------------------------------12
2.1.3 Motivation in research------------------------------------------------------------------------------13
2.1.4 Research and scientific method-------------------------------------------------------------------14
2.2 Types of research------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------15
2.2.1 Descriptive vs. Analytical Research --------------------------------------------------------------16
2.2.2 Applied vs. Fundamental Research --------------------------------------------------------------16
2.2.3 Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research -----------------------------------------------------------17
2.2.4 Conceptual vs. Empirical Research---------------------------------------------------------------18
2.3 Research Methods and Research Methodology---------------------------------------------------------18
2.4 What is legal research?----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------22
2.5 Scope and relevance of legal research---------------------------------------------------------------------22
2.5.1 Nature and Scope of Legal Research-------------------------------------------------------------22
2.5.2 Scope of Legal Research in the Common Law System and the Civil Law System------27
2.6 Importance (Purpose) of legal research-------------------------------------------------------------------30
2.6.1 Ascertainment of law--------------------------------------------------------------------------------30
2.6.2 Highlighting inbuilt ‘gaps’ and ‘ambiguities’---------------------------------------------------31
2.6.3 Determining consistency, coherence and stability of law----------------------------------31
2.6.4 Social auditing of law--------------------------------------------------------------------------------32
2.6.5 Suggesting reformsin law--------------------------------------------------------------------------32
2.7 Legal research by whom?-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------34

ii
2.7.1 By a Legislator -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------34
2.7.2 By a Judge----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------36
2.7.3 By a Lawyer---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------37
2.7.4 By a Law Teacher and Student of Law-----------------------------------------------------------40
2.8 Legal research and methodology----------------------------------------------------------------------------44
2.9 Sources of information-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------46
2.9.1 Primary sources --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------46
2.9.2 Secondary sources------------------------------------------------------------------------------------47
2.9.3 Tertiary sources--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------50
2.10 Major stages in legal research -------------------------------------------------------------------------51
2.10.1 Identification and formulation of a research problem-----------------------------------52
2.10.2 Review of literature ------------------------------------------------------------------------------54
2.10.3 Formulation of a hypothesis -------------------------------------------------------------------56
2.10.4 Research design-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------57
2.10.5 Collection of data---------------------------------------------------------------------------------58
2.10.6 Analysis of data------------------------------------------------------------------------------------59
2.10.7 Interpretation of data----------------------------------------------------------------------------59
2.11 Legal Research in Ethiopia: Perspectives and Problems----------------------------------------------61
UNIT 3: DOCTRAINAL AND NON-DOCTRINAL LEGAL RESEARCH---------------------68
3.1. Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------69
3.2. Doctrinal Legal Research--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------71
3.2.1 Introduction-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------71
3.2.2 Aims and Basic Tools of Doctrinal Legal Research-----------------------------------------------73
3.2.2.1 Aims -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------73
3.2.2.2 Basic tools------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------74

iii
3.2.3 Advantages and Limitations of Doctrinal Legal Research--------------------------------------80
3.2.3.1 Advantages ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------80
3.2.3.2 Limitations-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------83
3.3. Non-Doctrinal Legal Research Or Socio-Legal Research ----------------------------------------------85
3.3.1 Introduction-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------85
3.3.2 Aims and Basic Tools of Non-Doctrinal Legal Research-----------------------------------------87
3.3.2.1 Aims -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------87
3.3.2.2 Basic tools------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------89
3.3.3 Advantages and Limitations of Non-Doctrinal Legal Research--------------------------------93
3.3.3.1 Advantages----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------93
3.3.3.2 Limitations-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------94
3.4. Inter-relation between Doctrinal and Non-doctrinal Legal Research------------------------------97
UNIT 4: MODELS OF LEGAL RESEARCH AND CURRENT
TRENDS IN LEGAL RESEARCH------------------------------------------------101
4.1 Models of legal research------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------102
4.1.1 Evolutive andevaluative--------------------------------------------------------------------------------102
4.1.2 Identificatory and impact studies--------------------------------------------------------------------103
4.1.3 Projective and predictive-------------------------------------------------------------------------------105
4.1.4 Collative-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------105
4.1.5 Historical----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------106
4.1.6 Comparative-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------107
4.2 Current trends in legal research --------------------------------------------------------------------------------108
4.2.1 Mono-disciplinarylegal research---------------------------------------------------------------------108
4.2.2 Trans-disciplinarylegal research----------------------------------------------------------------------109

iv
4.2.3 Inter-disciplinarylegal research-----------------------------------------------------------------------111
UNIT 5: HYPOTHESIS---------------------------------------------------------------------115
5.1 INTRODUCTION----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------116
5.2 SOURCES OF HYPOTHESIS-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------119
5.2.1 Hunch or intuition--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------119
5.2.2 Findings of others’ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------119
5.2.3 A theory or a body of theory------------------------------------------------------------------------120
5.2.4 General social culture---------------------------------------------------------------------------------120
5.2.5 Analogy---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------120
5.2.6 Personal experience-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------121
5.3 CHARACTERISTICS OF A WORKABLE OR USABLE HYPOTHESIS---------------------------------------------------122
5.3.1 Hypothesis should be conceptually clear --------------------------------------------------------122
5.3.2. Hypothesis should be specific----------------------------------------------------------------------123
5.3.3 Hypothesis should be empirically testable ------------------------------------------------------123
5.3.4 Hypothesis should be related to available techniques --------------------------------------124
5.3.5 Hypothesis should be related to a body of theory or some theoretic-al orientation--124
5.4 ROLE OF HYPOTHESIS---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------125
5.4.1 Role of hypothesis in navigating research--------------------------------------------------------126
5.4.2 Role of ‘tested’ hypothesis --------------------------------------------------------------------------127
5.4.2.1 To test theories--------------------------------------------------------------------------------127
5.4.2.2 To suggest new theories---------------------------------------------------------------------127
5.4.2.3 To describe social phenomenon-----------------------------------------------------------127
5.4.2.4 To suggest social policy----------------------------------------------------------------------128

v
UNIT 6 RESEARCH DESIGN--------------------------------------------------------------130
6.1 Introduction-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------130
6.2 Major contents of research design------------------------------------------------------------------------134
6.2.1 Types of research design------------------------------------------------------------------------------139
6.3 Role (utility) of research design--------------------------------------------------------------------------147
UNIT 7: SAMPLING TECHNIQUES: RANDOM AND NON-RANDOM----------151
7.1 Some key-technical concepts:Population, sub-population,
stratification, element, sample, sampling, sampling techniques, sampling-error ----------------------152
7.2 Assumptions underlying in sampling-------------------------------------------------------------------------------153
7.3 Factors to be considered while drawing sample ----------------------------------------------------------------155
7.4 Major Sampling Techniques: Random and Non-random------------------------------------------------------156
7.4.1 Random sampling techniques: Typeswith their relative advantages
and disadvantages-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------156
7.4.2 Non-random sampling techniques: Types with their relative
advantages and disadvantages---------------------------------------------------------------157
UNIT 8:BASIC TOOLS OF DATA COLLECTION---------------------------------------------166
8.1 Interview-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------167
8.2 Interview Schedule-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------171
8.3 Questionnaire------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------173
8.4 Observation--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------178
8.4.1 Participant observation: Advantages andlimitations-----------------------------------------179
8.4.2 Non-participant observation: Advantages and limitations-----------------------------------179
UNIT 9: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA------------------------------------183
9.1 Doctrinal legal research-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------184
9.1.1 A general Approach to Legal Research------------------------------------------------------------------------185

vi
9.1.2 Doing the Legal research ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------191
9.2 Non-doctrinal legal research---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------203
UNIT 10: WRITING A RESEARCH REPORT-------------------------------------------------208
10.1 Structural layout of research report------------------------------------------------------------------------------211
10.1.1 The Preliminaries-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------212
10.1.2 The Text------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------212
10.1.3. The References-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------247

1
____________________________________________________________________
UNIT 1
INTRODUCTION
All progress is born of inquiry. Doubt is often better than
overconfidence, for it leads to inquiry, and inquiry leads to invention.
Hudson
Research is the systematic indulgence of one’s curiosity - - - and
when systematically pursued for the elucidation of events, we call it science.
Felix Frankfurter
There is no short-cut to the truth; no way to gain knowledge of the universe
except through the gateway of scientific method.
Karl Pearson
STRUCTURE
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Law and Society: Mutual Relationship & Interaction
1.3 Legal System: A System of Norms and Social System?
1.4 Role of Law in A Planned Socio-Economic Development
OBJECTIVES
After going through the Unit, you will be able to:
To familiarize students with the mutual relation and interaction between ‘law’
and ‘society’
To explain the social dimension of law
To stress the need for legal research
To highlight role of law in the socio-economic transformation

2
1.1 INTRODUCTION
‘Research’, in simple terms, can be defined as ‘systematic investigation towards
increasing the sum of human knowledge’ and as a ‘process’ of identifying and
investigating a ‘fact’ or a ‘problem’ with a view to acquiring an insight into it or
finding an apt solution therefor. An approach becomes systematic when a researcher
follows certain scientific methods.
In this context, legal research may be defined as ‘systematic’ finding law on a
particular point and making advancement in the science of law. However, the finding
law is not so easy. It involves a systematic search of legal materials, statutory,
subsidiary and judicial pronouncements. For making advancement in the science of
law, one needs to go into the ‘underlying principles or reasons of the law’. These
activities warrant a systematic approach. An approach becomes systematic when a
researcher follows scientific method.
Generally, law is influenced by the prevailing social values and ethos. Most of the
times, law also attempts to mould or change the existing social values and attitudes.
Such a complex nature of law and its operation require systematic approach to the
‘understanding’ of ‘law’ and its ‘operational facets’. A systematic investigation into
these aspects of law helps in knowing the existing and emerging legislative policies,
laws, their social relevance and efficacy, etc.
In this backdrop, the present course on Legal Research Methods intends to acquaint
the students of law with scientific methods of inquiry into law. It also intends to make
them familiar with nature, scope, and significance of legal research. In addition, it
endeavors to make them aware of role of legal research in the development of law and
legal institutions, in particular and socio-economic development of the country in
general.
With these objectives, the course addresses to sources, categories and types of legal
research. It focuses on legal research methods and tools. It highlights different
dimensions and tools of doctrinal legal research as well as non-doctrinal legal

3
research or socio-legal research. In other words, the course strives to instill in the law
students basic skill of identifying research problems, planning and executing legal
research projects and of appreciating the problems associated therewith. It aims at
instilling in them basic research skills so that they can plan and pursue legal and
socio-legal research in future.
1.2 LAW AND SOCIETY: MUTUAL RELATIONSHIP & INTERACTION
Law does not operate in a vacuum. It has to reflect social values, attitudes and
behavior. Societal values and norms, directly or indirectly, influence law. Law also
endeavors to mould and control these values, attitudes and behavioral patterns so that
they flow in a proper channel. It attempts either to support the social system or to
change the prevalent social situation or relationship by its formal processes. Law also
influences other parts of the social system. Law, therefore, can be perceived as
symbolizing the public affirmation of social facts and norms as well as means of
social control and an instrument of social change.1
Commenting on the
interrelationship between law and society, Luhman observed:
All collective human life is directly or indirectly shaped by law. Law
is, like knowledge, an essential and all pervasive fact of the social
condition. No area of life-whether it is the family or the religious
community, scientific research is the internal network of political
parties-can find a lasting social order that is not based on law ---. A
minimum amount of legal orientation is indispensable everywhere.2
Law is not, nor can any discipline be, an insular one. Each rule postulates a factual
situation of life to which the rule is to be applied to produce a certain outcome.
Law, in essence, is a normative and prescriptive science. It lays down norms and
standards for human behavior in a set of specified situation(s). It is a ‘rule of conduct
1
See, Lawrence M Friedmann and Steward Macaulay, Law and Behavioral Science (Bobbs-Merrill Co,
Inc, Indianapolis, 1969), Roscoe Pound, Jurisprudence, vol 2 (St Paul, Minn., West Publishing Co.,
USA), and Sir Carleton Kemp Allen, Law in the Making (Oxford, London, 7th
edn, 1964) chap IV On
Legislation.
2
Luhman, Sociological Theory of Law (1972, English Translation, 1985) at 1, cited in, 50 MLR 686
(1987).

4
or action’ prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a ‘controlling
authority’. It operates in a formal fashion. It enforces these prescribed norms through
state’s coercive powers.
However, the societal values and patterns are dynamic and complex. These changing
societal values and ethos obviously make the discipline of law dynamic and complex.
Law, therefore, has to be dynamic.
Law has acquired a paramount significance in a modern welfare state as an effective
instrumentality of socio-economic transformation. It indeed operates as a catalyst for
such a transformation.
Such a complex nature of law and its operation require systematic approach to the
‘understanding’ of ‘law’ and its ‘operational facets’. A systematic investigation into
these aspects of law helps in knowing the existing and emerging legislative policies,
laws, and their social relevance. It also enables to assess efficacy of law as an
instrument of socio-economic changes and to identify bottlenecks, if any. Law, thus,
has a social context. Law without its social context is simply a noteworthy mental
exercise. ‘Law without social content or significance is law without flesh, blood or
bowels’.3
1.3 LEGAL SYSTEM: A SYSTEM OF NORMS AND SOCIAL SYSTEM?
In this background, a system of law can be conceptualized in three principal ways.
First, a legal system can be conceived as an aggregate of legal norms. Second, it can
be conceived as systems of social behavior, of roles, statutes, and institutions, as
involving patterned interactions between the makers, interpreters, breakers, enforcers,
and compliers of the norms of law. Third, legal system may be equated with social
control systems, involving differential bases of social authority and power, different
normative requirements and sanctions, and distinctive institutional complexes.
Thus, there are three dimensions or aspects of a legal system: (i) legal system as a
normative system, (ii) legal system as a social system, and (iii) legal system as a
3
S P Simpson & Ruth Field, Law and the Social Sciences, 32 Va L Rev 862 (1946).

5
combination of formal and non-formal norms of social control. Each one of these
dimensions of ‘legal system’, however, raise different queries for investigation and set
different orbits for inquiry.
Legal system, as an aggregate of legal norms, raises a set of typical questions. A
prominent among them are: How is law generated? What forces in society influenced
or created particular kinds of law? What makes a system of law out of a vast and
heterogeneous mass of normative materials? By what concepts and criteria can we
identify the existence of a legal system? While the second conception of legal system
warrants a study of institutional behavioral patterns and roles of the lawmakers
(Legislature), law interpreters (Judges), law-enforcers (the police), law-breakers
(wrongdoers) and law-compliers (law-abiders) and their influence, individual or
cumulative, in the legal system and legal processes. The third one addresses to the
inter-relationship (supportive or otherwise) between the formal (legal) rules and
(informal) non-legal rules (such as religious, indigenous, or customary norms) in
shaping law as social control system.
Further, it is necessary to recall, in brief, some of the philosophical explanations of
law as they have a significant bearing on the social dimension or context of law.
These explanations look at law in its working and the myths about functioning of law
and truth about its role.4
The basic tenet of Marxian approach to law is that ‘law’,
though social system structures it, is an instrument in the hands of the classes in
power to use it to protect their own interests. The class in power uses law to exploit
powerless classes. While Roscoe Pound insists that law is an instrument of social
engineering. He asserts that law can be an effective tool for establishing an egalitarian
social order.
Traditionally, the first dimension of legal system, namely law as a system of norms, is
the domain of academic lawyers; the second one, i.e. law as a system of social
behavior, is of sociologists, and the third one is of social anthropologists.5
These three
dimensions of a system of law, in ultimate analysis, broadly speak of normative
4
Adam Podgorecki, Law and Society (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1974) 4.
5
Upendra Baxi, Socio-legal Research in India-A Programschrift (Indian Council of Social Science
Research (ICSSR), New Delhi, 1975). Reprinted in, S K Verma & M Afzal Wani (eds), Legal
Research and Methodology (Indian Law Institute, New Delhi, 2nd
edn, 2001), at pp 656-657.

6
character of law (or perceive law as system of norms) and of social context (or
sociology of law) of law. It treats law as a means to define an end. The traditional
perception of law as a system of norms concerns with analytical-linguistic study of
law while the sociology of law highlights the ‘social context’ of ‘law’.
1.4 ROLEOF LAW IN A PLANNED SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A contemporary modern state, which endeavors to bring socio-economic
transformation envisaged in its Constitution, assigns a catalyst role to law. It strives to
bring such a transformation through a cluster of social welfare legislations enacted in
pursuance of its constitutional objectives, policies and perceptions.
For example, a careful look at the well-articulated ‘economic objectives’, ‘social
objectives’, and ‘environmental objectives’ embodied in the FDRE Constitution6
reveals laws’ role in accomplishing them. The Government, inter alia, is duty bound
to ensure that all Ethiopians get equal opportunity to improve their economic
conditions and to promote equitable distribution of wealth among them and to deploy
land and other natural resources for the common benefit of the People and
development. It has also to make endeavor to protect and promote the health, welfare
and living standards of the working population of the country. The Constitution also
obligates the Government to provide special assistance to Nations, Nationalities, and
Peoples least advantaged in economic and social development. The Constitution also
envisages Ethiopians access to public health and other basic amenities. It assures them
of a clean and healthy environment. All these constitutionally contemplated
prescriptive obviously assign a greater role to ‘law’ in their accomplishment.
? Activity 1.1: What relationship is there between Ethiopian Laws (choose
sample laws, such as Constitutional law, Family Law, Commercial law, Criminal
law, etc) and the Ethiopian People, Nations and Nationalities? Discuss in groups,
being from 2 to 3 students.
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
6
See, arts 89- 90 & 92, FDRE Constitution.

7
CHECK YOUR PROGRESS
What is the link between law and society?
Does law influence society or society influence law?
Describe social dimensions of law
Is law normative in character or a part of social system?
Comment upon roles of law in bringing socio-economic changes
FURTHER SUGGESTED READINGS
Yehezkel Dror, Law and Social Change, 33 Tul LR 749 (1959)
A V Dicey, Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in
England during the Nineteenth Century (MacMillan, 1905), pp 1-42
Vilhelm Aubert, Some Social Functions of Legislation, 10 Acta Sociologica
99 (1966)
Julius Stone, Social Dimensions of Law and Justice (Stanford University,
Stanford, 1966)
W Friedmann, Law in a Changing Society (Stevens & Sons, London, 2nd
edn,
1972), chap 1: the Interaction of Legal and Social Change

8
_____________________________________________________________
UNIT 2
LEGAL RESEARCH: AN INTRODUCTION
- - - [T]he scholars --- must announce that their needs for legal research
arise from a determination to do something new –
to look at the world with unbiased eyes,
to try to find out how and why the law ticks,
to see whether the law is in fact serving the needs of society today. - - -
The touchstone of researcher is the open, inquiring mind. - - -
Legal research will get somewhere only if legal scholars abandon any thought
that there is something sacred about the law as it is.
Even if we accept certain values in our society as sacred,
this does not make any particular legal proposition sacred.
George D Braden
There is no shortcut to the truth --- no way to gain knowledge
of the universe except through the gateway of scientific method.
Karl Pearson
STRUCTURE
LEGAL RESEARCH: AN INTRODUCTION
2.1 What is research?
2.1.1 Meaning of research
2.1.2 Objectives of research
2.1.3 Motivation in research
2.1.4 Research and scientific method
2.2 Types of research
2.2.1 Descriptive vs. Analytical Research
2.2.2 Applied vs. Fundamental Research
2.2.3 Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research

9
2.2.4 Conceptual vs. Empirical Research
2.3 Research Methods and Research Methodology
2.4 What is legal research?
2.5 Scope and relevance of legal research
2.5.1 Nature and Scope of Legal Research
2.5.2 Scope of Legal Research in the Common Law System and the Civil
Law System
2.6 Importance (Purpose) of legal research
2.6.1 Ascertainment of law
2.6.2 Highlighting inbuilt ‘gaps’ and ‘ambiguities’
2.6.3 Determining consistency, coherence and stability of law
2.6.4 Social auditing of law
2.6.5 Suggesting reforms in law
2.7 Legal research by whom?
2.7.1 By a Legislator
2.7.2 By a Judge
2.7.3 By a Lawyer
2.7.4 By a Law Teacher and Student of Law
2.8 Legal research and methodology
2.9 Sources of information
2.9.1 Primary sources
2.9.2 Secondary sources
2.9.3 Tertiary sources
2.10 Major stages in legal research
2.10.1 Identification and formulation of a research problem
2.10.2 Review of literature
2.10.3 Formulation of a hypothesis
2.10.4 Research design
2.10.5 Collection of data
2.10.6 Analysis of data
2.10.7 Interpretation of data
2.10.8 Research report
2.11 Legal Research in Ethiopia: Perspectives and Problems

10
OBJECTIVES
After going through the Unit, you will be able to:
Explain the research methodology and its constituents
State the various types of research approaches
Describe the various steps involved in the research process
Describe the various types of research designs appropriate for different types
of research
Explain legal research methods and methodology
Explain importance of legal research in a modern welfare state
Explain nature, scope and limitation of legal research
Explain major stages in carrying legal research
2.1 WHAT IS RESEARCH?
2.1.1 Meaning of Research
The term ‘research’ has received a number of varied meanings and explanations. In
its ordinary sense, the term refers to a search for knowledge. The Advanced Learner’s
Dictionary of Current English spells out the meaning of ‘research’ as ‘a careful
investigation or inquiry specifically through search for new facts in any branch of
knowledge’.7
Redman and Mory, in a similar tone, define research as a ‘systematized
effort to gain new knowledge’.8
According to the Webster’s International Dictionary,
‘research’ is ‘a careful, critical inquiry or explanation in seeking facts or principles;
diligent investigation in order to ascertain something’. While Webster Dictionary
explains the term ‘research’ to mean ‘a systematic investigation towards increasing
the sum of knowledge’. D Slesinger and M Stephenson perceived the term ‘research’
as ‘the manipulation of things, concepts or symbols for the purpose of generalizing to
extend, correct or verify knowledge, whether that knowledge aids in construction of
7
The Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (Oxford, 1952) 1069.
8
L V Redman and A V H Mory, The Romance of Research (1923) 10.

11
theory or in the practice of an art’.9
The 1911 Cambridge edition of the Encyclopedia
Britannica defines research as:
The act of searching into a matter closely and carefully, inquiry
directed to the discovery of truth and in particular, the trained scientific
investigation of the principles and facts of any subject, based on
original and first hand study of authorities or experiment.
Investigations of every kind which has been based on original sources
of knowledge may be styled research and it may be said that without
‘research’ no authoritative works have been written, no scientific
discoveries or inventions made, no theories of any value propounded –
A combined reading of all the above-mentioned ‘explanations’ of the term ‘research’
reveals that ‘research’ is the ‘careful, diligent and exhaustive investigation of a
specific subject matter’ with a view to knowing the truth and making original
contribution in the existing stock of knowledge. It is, in short, ‘systematic search’ in
‘pursuit of knowledge’ of the researcher. Mere aimless, unrecorded, unchecked search
is not research which can never lead to valid conclusions. But diligent, intelligent,
continued search for something is research. It refers to the process and means to
acquire knowledge about any natural or human phenomenon. It involves a systematic
inquiry into a phenomenon of interest. It is the process of discovering or uncovering
new facts. It aims to contribute to the thitherto known information of the
phenomenon.
Therefore, only systematic intensive investigation into, or inquiry of, fact qualifies to
get the label of ‘research’. And a ‘search’ becomes ‘systematic’ when a researcher, in
his quest for knowledge and pursuit of truth, attempts to collect the required
information from various sources and in a variety of ways systematically and exposes
data to a severe and intensive scrutiny. Research, thus, involves systematic scientific
investigation of facts (or their hidden or unknown facets) with a view to determining
or ascertaining something, which may satisfy the curiosity of the investigator and
carry forward (his) knowledge. Such research involves identification of a research
9
D Slesinger and M Stephenson, The Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, vol IX (MacMillan, 1930).

12
problem, the ascertainment of facts, their logical ordering and classification, the use
of (inductive and deductive) logic to interpret the collected and classified facts and the
assertion of conclusions premised on, and supported by, the collected information.
‘Research’, therefore, means a scientific collection and inspection of facts with a view
to determining (or searching) something, which may satisfy the curiosity of the
investigator and carry forward his knowledge. It requires a sound design for
investigation, the appropriate methods of data collection and a mode of analysis.
The prefix ‘re’ in the word ‘research’, according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary,
means ‘repeated, frequent or intensive’. ‘Research’, therefore, implies a continued
‘frequentative’ ‘intensive’ ‘search’ for truth and/or an inquiry for the verification of a
fresh theory or for supplementing a prevailing theory. Research is, thus, a continuum.
2.1.2 Objectives of Research
The purpose of research, thus, is to acquire knowledge or to know about ‘something’
in a scientific and systematic way. Its purpose may, however, be to find solution to the
identified problem. The former is referred to as ‘basic’ or ‘pure’ or ‘fundamental’
research while the latter takes the label of ‘applied’ or ‘action’ research. Fundamental
research is mainly concerned with generalizations and with formulation of a theory
(or re-confirmation of the existing theory). Its main aim is to acquire knowledge for
the sake of acquiring it. Applied research, on the other hand, aims at finding or
discovering solutions or answers to the identified ‘problem(s)’ or ‘question(s)’.
Obviously, every research study has its own goal(s) or objective(s). Nevertheless,
‘research objective’ of a given research study may fall under either of the following
broad categories of ‘research objectives’:
1. To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insights into it.
2. To portray accurately the characteristics of a particular individual, situation or a
group.
3. To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with which it is
associated.

13
4. To test causal relationship between two or more than two facts or situations. 10
5. To ‘know’ and ‘understand’ a phenomenon with a view to formulating the
problem precisely.
6. To ‘describe’ accurately a given phenomenon and to test hypotheses about
relationships among its different dimensions.
? Activity 2.1: Grouping yourself, from three to five students, discuss the
practical significance of research in analysis of legal provisions and principles, and
to study relationship between FDRE Constitution and Regional Constitutions?
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
2.1.3 Motivation in Research
An equally important question, namely, what makes a scholar to undertake research,
deserves our attention. A general response to the question, probably, would be that a
person, who is curious to know something more about something, undertakes a
systematic study of that something to kill his curiosity. His quest for knowing about,
or acquiring knowledge of, ‘something’, plausibly motivates him to undertake
research of that ‘something’. However, there could be a couple of other ‘motivations’
for him to get indulged into research. They are:
1. Desire to earn a research degree along with its consequential benefits.
2. His ‘concern’ for thitherto ‘unsolved’ or ‘unexplored’ ‘problem’ and his keen
desire to seek solution therefor, and be a proud recipient of that contribution.
3. Desire to acquire reputation and acclaim from his fellow men.
4. Desire to get intellectual joy of doing some ‘creative’ work.
5. Desire to render some service to society. 11
However, when it concerns with legal research, a scholar of law, in addition, needs to
convince himself that his desire for legal research arises from his determination to do
10
C R Kothari, Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (New Age International Publishers,
New Delhi, 2nd
edn, 2004, Reprint 2007) 2.
11
Ibid.

14
something new-to look at the world with unbiased eyes, to try with open and inquiring
mind to find out how and why the law tricks, to see whether the law is in fact serving
the needs of today. Sometimes he, particularly when he is interested in finding out
social utility of law, may have to come out of bookish introspection and to venture
into empirical study. He may also require joining hands with other social scientists.12
2.1.4 Research and Scientific Method
Research, as stated earlier, is a systematic inquiry into a ‘fact’. It involves the
collection of facts, analysis of the collected facts, and logical inferences drawn from
the analyzed facts. A method of inquiry becomes systematic only when the researcher
resorts to a systematic approach to, and follows a scientific method of inquiry into, the
fact under investigation. Research, simply put, is an endeavor to arrive at certain
conclusions through the application of scientific methods. ‘There is no shortcut to the
truth --- no way to gain knowledge of the universe except through the gateway of
scientific method.’13
Scientific method is loaded with logical considerations. It is the
pursuit of truth as determined by logical considerations. The ideal of science is to
achieve a systematic inter-relation of facts. Scientific method attempts to achieve ‘this
ideal by experimentation, observation, logical arguments from accepted postulates
and a combination of these three in varying proportions’.14
In scientific method, logic
aids in formulating propositions explicitly and accurately so that their possible
alternatives become clear. Further, logic develops the consequences of such
alternatives, and when these are compared with observable phenomenon, it becomes
possible for the researcher or the scientist to state which alternative is most in
harmony with the observed facts. All this is done through experimentation and survey
investigations, which constitute the integral parts of scientific method. ‘The scientific
method’, according to Karl Pearson, ‘is one and the same in all branches (of science)
and that method is the method of all logical trained minds --- the unity of all sciences
consists alone in its methods, not its material; the man who classifies facts of any kind
12
George D Braden, Legal Research: A Variation on an Old Lament, 5 Jr of Legal Edu 39 (1952-53).
13
Karl Pearson, The Grammar of Science (Meridian Books, Inc., New York, 1957) 10.
14
Bernard Ostle & Richard W Mensing, Statistics in Research (the Iowa State University Press, Ames
Iowa, 3rd
edn, 1975) 2.

15
whatever, who sees their mutual relation and describes their sequences, is applying
the Scientific Method and he is a man of science’.15
The scientific method is, thus, a method used by the science. Science rests on reason
(rationality) and facts. Science is logical, empirical and operational. Scientific method
is, therefore, based on certain postulates and has certain characteristics. They are: (i) it
is logical, i.e. it is basically concerned with proof based on reason, (ii) it is empirical,
i.e. theories are rooted in facts that are verifiable, (iii) it is operational, i.e. it utilizes
relevant terms/concepts that help in quantification and conclusion, (iv) it is committed
to only objective considerations, (v) it pre-supposes ethical neutrality, i.e. it aims at
nothing but making only adequate and correct statements about population objects,
(vi) it is propositional, i.e. it results into probabilistic predictions that can be proved or
disproved, (vii) its methodology is public, i.e. it is made known to all concerned for
critical scrutiny, testing/retesting of propositions, (viii) it tends to be systematic, i.e.
indicates inter-relationship and organization between the facts and propositions, and
(ix) it aims at theorizing, i.e. formulating most general axioms or scientific theories.16
Scientific method implies an objective, logical and systematic method, i.e. a method
free from personal bias or prejudice, a method to ascertain demonstrable qualities of a
phenomenon capable of being verified, a method wherein the researcher is guided by
the rules of logical reasoning, a method wherein the investigation proceeds in an
orderly manner and a method that implies internal consistency.17
2.2 TYPES OF RESEARCH
According to C R Kothari, the basic types of research are: (i) Descriptive and
Analytical Research, (ii) Applied and Fundamental Research, (iii) Quantitative and
15
Karl Pearson, The Grammar of Science, supra n 7, pp 10-12.
16
See, C R Kothari, Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, supra n 4, pp 9-10, T S
Wilkinson & P L Bhandarkar, Methodology and Techniques of Social Research (Himalaya Publishing
House, Mumbai, 16th
edn, Reprint 2005), chap 1, J T Doby (ed), An Introduction to Social Research
(Stackpole, 1967) 16 et. seq., Morris R Cohen & Ernest Nigel, An Introduction to Logic and Scientific
Method (HarCourt, Brace, New York, 1934), William J Goode & Paul K Hatt, Methods in Social
Research (McGraw-Hill, 1952).
17
C R Kothari, Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques supra n 4, 10.

16
Qualitative Research, and (iv) Conceptual and Empirical Research.18
Each one of
these is briefly discussed here below:
2.2.1 Descriptive vs. Analytical Research
Descriptive research, as its name suggests, describes the state of affairs as it exists at
present. It merely describes the phenomenon or situation under study and its
characteristics. It reports only what has happened or what is happening. It therefore
does not go into the causes of the phenomenon or situation. The methods commonly
used in descriptive research are survey methods of all kinds, including comparative
and co-relational methods, and fact-finding enquiries of different kinds. Thus,
descriptive research cannot be used for creating causal relationship between variables.
While in analytical research, the researcher uses his facts or information already
available and makes their analysis to make a critical evaluation of the material.
2.2.2 Applied vs. Fundamental Research
Applied research or action research aims at finding a solution for an immediate
problem. Here the researcher sees his research in a practical context. While in
fundamental research or pure research or basic research, the researcher is mainly
concerned with generalization and with the formulation of a theory. He undertakes
research only to derive some increased knowledge in a field of his inquiry. He is least
bothered about its practical context or utility. Research studies concerning human
behavior carried on with a view to making generalizations about human behavior fall
in the category of fundamental or pure research. But if the research (about human
behavior) is carried out with a view to solving a problem (related to human behavior),
it falls in the domain of applied or action research.
The central aim of applied research is to discover a solution for some pressing
practical problem, while that of fundamental research is to find additional information
about a phenomenon and thereby to add to the existing body of scientific knowledge.
The ‘applied’ scientist is thus works within a set of certain values and norms to which
18
Ibid., pp 2-5.

17
he feels committed. A sociologist, for example, when works with a social problem to
find solution therefor and proposes, through a systematic inquiry, a solution or
suggests some measures to ameliorate the problem, his research takes the label of
‘applied’ or ‘action’ research. But when he undertakes a study just to find out the
‘what’, ‘how’ of the social problem, his inquiry takes the nomenclature of ‘pure’ or
‘fundamental’ research.
However, the above-mentioned ‘distinguishing factor’ between the ‘applied’ and
‘fundamental’ research need not be conceived as a ‘line’ putting the two ‘across’ the
‘line’ forever or an ‘either-or’ dichotomy. In fact, they are not mutually exclusive.
There is a constant interplay between the two, each contributing to the other in many
ways.
2.2.3. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research
Quantitative research is based on the measurement of quantity or amount. It is
applicable to a phenomenon that can be expressed in terms of quantity. It is
systematic scientific investigation of quantitative properties of a phenomenon and
their inter-relation. The objective of quantitative research is to develop and employ
mathematical models, theories and hypotheses pertaining to the phenomenon under
inquiry. The process of measurement, thus, is central to quantitative research because
it provides fundamental connection between empirical observation and mathematical
expression of quantitative relationship.
Qualitative research, on the other hand, is concerned with qualitative phenomenon,
i.e. phenomenon relating to or involving quality or kind. For example, when a
researcher is interested in investigating the reasons for, or motives behind, certain
human behavior, say why people think or do certain things, or in investing their
attitudes towards, or opinions about, a particular subject or institution, say adultery or
judiciary, his research becomes qualitative research. Unlike quantitative research,
qualitative research relies on reason behind various aspects of behavior.

18
2.2.4. Conceptual vs. Empirical Research
Conceptual research is related to some abstract idea(s) or theory. It is generally used
by philosophers and thinkers to develop new concepts or to re-interpret the existing
ones. On the other hand, empirical research relies on experience or observation alone,
often without due regard for system or theory. It is data-based research, coming up
with conclusions that are capable of being verified by observation or experiment. It is
therefore also known as experimental research. In empirical research, it is necessary
to get facts firsthand, at their source. In such a research, the researcher must first
provide himself with a working hypothesis or guess as to the probable results. He then
works to gets enough facts (i.e. data) to prove or disprove his hypothesis.
? Activity 2.2: Classify the following published research products, using their
titles, into one or more category of the above types of research? Discuss at least two
of them with the help of your instructor (If possible read them).
i. The Right against Torture: Institutional and Normative Framework, published
on the Ethiopian Journal of Legal Education, Vol.1.No.1, July 2008, and written by
professor Khushal Vibhute.
ii. Abortion Law in Ethiopia, published on Mizan Law Review,Vol.2 No. 1,
January 2008,written by Assistant professor Tsehai Wada.
iii. Proof of Marriage by Possession of Status: the law and practice, published on
Higawint under Ministry of Justice,vol.3,No.1,August 2005,written in Amharic
language by Filipos Aynalem.
iv. The Child and the Law in Ethiopia: The case of the UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child, published on Journal of Ethiopian Law,vol.18, August
1997,Written by Associate Professor Tilahun Teshome.
v. Legal Pluralism: Its Promises and Pitfalls for Ethiopia, published on Jimma
University Journal of Law,vol.1 No.1,October 2007,written by Alemayehu Fentaw.
2.3 RESEARCH METHODS AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

19
The term ‘research methods’ refers to all those methods and techniques that are used
by a researcher in conducting his research. The term, thus, refers to the methods,
techniques or tools employed by a researcher for collecting and processing of data,
establishing the relationship between the data and unknown facts, and evaluating the
accuracy of the results obtained. Sometimes, it is used to designate the concepts and
procedures employed in the analysis of data, howsoever collected, to arrive at
conclusion. In other words, ‘research methods’ are the ‘tools and techniques’ in a
‘tool box’ that can be used for collection of data (or for gathering evidence) and
analysis thereof. ‘Research methods’ therefore, can be put into the following three
groups:
1. The methods which are concerned with the collection of data [when the data
already available are not sufficient to arrive at the required solution].
2. The statistical techniques [which are used for establishing relationships
between the data and the unknowns].
3. The methods which are used to evaluate the accuracy of the results obtained.
The term ‘research methodology’, on the other hand, refers to a ‘way to
systematically solve’ the research problem. It may be understood as a ‘science of
studying how research is done scientifically’. It involves a study of various steps and
methods that a researcher needs generally to adopt in his investigation of a research
problem along with the logic behind them. It is a study of not only of methods but
also of explanation and justification for using certain research methods and of the
methods themselves. It includes in it the philosophy and practice of the whole
research process. In other words, research methodology is a set of rules of procedures
about the way of conducting research. It includes in it not just a compilation of
various research methods but also the rules for their application (in a given situation)
and validity (for the research problem at hand).
A researcher, therefore, is required to know not only the research methods or
techniques but also the methodology, as he needs to decide as well as to understand
the relevancy and efficacy of the research methods in pursuing the research problem
at hand. He may be confronted with equally relevant and efficacious alternative
research methods and techniques at each stage of his research study. He, therefore,

20
has to consciously resort to the research methods and techniques that are most
appropriate to carry his investigation in a more systematic manner. This becomes
possible only when he is acquainted with the underlying assumptions and utility of
various research methods or techniques available to him. A study of research
methodology equips him with this kind of knowledge and skill. C R Kothari, bringing
out the correlation between research methods and research methodology, observed:
--- [R]esearch methodology has many dimensions and research methods
do constitute a part of the research methodology. The scope of research
methodology is wider than that of research methods. Thus, when we talk
of research methodology we not only talk of the research methods but
also consider the logic behind the methods we use in the context of our
research study and explain why we are using a particular method or
technique and why we are not using others so that research results are
capable of being evaluated either by the researcher himself or by others.
Why a research study has been undertaken, how the research problem has
been identified, in what way and why the hypothesis has been formulated,
what data have been collected and what particular method has been
adopted, why particular technique of analyzing data has been used and a
host of similar other questions are usually answered when we talk of
research methodology concerning a research problem or study.19
A study of research methodology has the following advantages:
1. It inculcates in a researcher the ability to formulate his research problem in an
intelligent manner.
2. It inculcates in him objectivity in perceiving his research problem and seeking
solutions therefor.
3. It equips him to carry out his research undertaking in an efficient manner and
in a better way.
4. It enables him to take rational decisions at every step of his research.
5. It enables him to design appropriate research technique(s) and to use it (them)
in an intelligent and efficient manner.
19
Ibid, 8.

21
6. It enhances his ability to analyze and interpret data with reasonable objectivity
and confidence.
7. It enhances ability of the researcher and/or others to evaluate research findings
objectively and use the research results in a confident way.
8. It entails a good research.
9. It enables him to find a satisfactory way of acquiring new knowledge.
Importance of knowing ‘research methodology’ or ‘the way of doing research’ is well
articulated by C R Kothari as follows:
In fact, importance of knowing the methodology of research or how
research is done stems from the following considerations:
(i) --- The knowledge of methodology provides good training
specially to the new research worker and enables him to do
better research. It helps him to develop disciplined thinking or
‘bent of mind’ to observe the field objectively. ---
(ii) Knowledge of how to do research will inculcate the ability to
evaluate and use research results with reasonable confidence. --
-
(iii) When one knows how research is done, then one may have the
satisfaction of acquiring a new intellectual tool which can
become a way of looking at the world and of judging every day
experience. Accordingly, it enables us to make intelligent
decisions concerning problems facing us in practical life at
different points of time. Thus, the knowledge of research
methodology provides tools to look at things objectively.
(iv) --- The knowledge of methodology helps the consumer of
research results to evaluate them and enables him to take
rational decisions.20
20
Ibid, 10.

22
2.4 WHAT IS LEGAL RESEARCH?
‘Legal research’, taking clue from the meaning of ‘research’ as outlined in the
preceding pages, may be defined as ‘systematic investigation towards increasing the
sum of knowledge of law’. However, a scholar has commented that this definition is
‘too broad’ and ‘lacks articulation’ and proposed a different definition. He observed:
Research may be defined as systematic fact-finding (that is, to find
what the law is on a particular point) and advancement of the science
of law. In a strict sense, legal research is understood as limited to those
works which contribute to the advancement of legal science (that is
excluding such materials as text-books and case books, etc.) This is a
too narrow a view of research and we need not adopt such a restricted
definition of legal research. Even the fact-finding is not so easy as it
may seem. First, a researcher has to go into the different statutory
provisions and the rules made thereunder. Secondly, he may have to
examine the mass of case-law which may have accumulated on the
point in issue, and it is not an easy matter to derive a clear-cut legal
proposition from the tangled mass of case-law.
To advance the science of law, it is necessary for a researcher to go
into the underlying principles or reasons of the law. The enquiries will
have to be: Why a particular rule? What led to its adoption? What are
its effects? Whether it is suited to the present conditions? How can it
be improved? Whether it needs to be replaced entirely by a new rule?21
Thus, the term ‘legal research’ take into its ambit ‘a systematic finding’ or
‘ascertaining’ law’ on the identified topic or in the given area as well as ‘an inquiry’
into ‘law’ with a view to making advancement in the science of law.
Finding law on a particular subject, as stated earlier, is not an easy task. There may be
a number of statutes (as well as statutory provisions scattered in different statutes)
with frequent amendments on the subject under inquiry. In addition, these statutes and
21
S N Jain, Legal Research and Methodology, 14 Jr of Ind L Inst 487 (1972), at 490.

23
statutory provisions may be supplemented from time to time by a bulk of rules,
regulations, orders, directives and government resolutions. Similarly, one (particularly
in the common law jurisdictions) requires to look for pouring judicial
pronouncements of the higher judicial institutions interpreting these provisions for
finding ‘true’ meaning and ambit of the legal provisions. A quest for making
advancement in the science of law requires a legal researcher to systematically probe
into underlying ‘principles’ of, and ‘reasons’ for, ‘law’. Thus, legal research ha s a
very wide scope as it, in ultimate analysis, involves an inquiry into one or the other
dimension or aspect of ‘law’.
Legal research is, thus, the process of identifying and retrieving information necessary
to support legal decision-making. It includes in it each step of a course of action that
begins with an analysis of the facts of a problem and concludes with the application
and communication of the results of the investigation.
? Activity 2.3.First, list and then discuss the elements constituting the meaning
of legal research?
_____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
2.5 SCOPE AND RELEVANCEOF LEGAL RESEARCH
2.5.1 Nature and Scope of Legal Research
A Welfare and Democratic State envisages socio-economic transformation for the
development of a ‘just social order’ based on ‘equality and socio-economic justice’.
Constitution of such a country invariably contemplates extensive use of law for
bringing about the desired socio-economic transformation of the social order. It
allows, rather expects, the state to use its legislative power to bring about such a
change. Any serious step by the state towards social amelioration and economic
progress requires legislation and legal authority. Law, therefore, acts as a catalytic
agent for such socio-economic transformation.

24
However, in a democratic political set-up, the legislative processes have to be
informed by public opinion. At the same time, public opinion is required to be
changed through legislative process and concretization.22
A good Legislator ought to know the coercion-potential of the laws and how much
social resistance they can withstand. He must, among other things, to know the social
mores, habits, and culture. Similarly, he must be able to take a realistic estimate of the
effect of law by taking into account its inherent strengths and weaknesses. Jeremy
Bentham talked of legislation as a science and wanted all the laws to be restructured
on the touchstone of utility. Roscoe Pound conceived law as an instrument of social
engineering. Both, therefore, visualized legislation on rational, humanistic and
pragmatic basis. Such legislation requires an ongoing research into the facts and also
of the interaction between the law and social & human behavior. If we find that most
of the social welfare legislations have failed to bring the desired changes or
transformation, it may be because they were not planned systematically and no cost-
benefit analysis was done at their formulation stage. Law has to be preceded by a
serious study of the dynamics of law and social changes. In the absence of such a
study, law is bound to be ineffective and an utter failure in its mission. It would
reduce merely to a legislative décor and symbolic.
A set of questions, therefore, warrants a careful and critical investigation. Prominent
among them are: Why is a legislation made? What are the forces, lobbies or pressure
groups that activated the legislation, and for what reasons or objectives? What are the
forces or pressure groups that opposed the legislation and on what grounds? What led
to its adoption? What are its contemplated effects? How much is the success
percentage of it as a social legislation? Why did the law become dysfunctional? Why
it remained un-operationalized or less-operatinalized? What corrective measures need
to take to make it more effective? Does it merely need some modifications or
replacement by a new statute?
22
See, Albert Venn Dicey, Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England
during the Nineteenth Century (MacMillan & Co, London, 1924), Lectures I, II & III; Morris Ginsberg,
Law and Opinion in England in the Twentieth Century, (1959), and Julius Stone, Social Dimensions of
Law and Justice (Stanford University, Stanford, 1966).

25
In a modern democratic polity the major state-governance is through administrative
processes. Administrative processes range from making of laws to adjudication. It
involves delegated or secondary legislation (in the form of rules, regulations, orders,
notifications, bye-laws and directives); administrative adjudication (in the form of
tribunals and quasi-judicial conciliatory bodies). It also regulates trade, business;
secures essential commodities for people; involves in export and import of goods;
undertakes and manages public-sector enterprises, and exercises a number of
discretionary powers in a variety of ways and situations. A continuous careful inquiry
into: the need for the delegated legislation and the legislative policy reflected therein;
structural and operational ambits of the body created thereunder; inbuilt-mechanism
for ensuring smooth execution of the policy; (ab)use of discretionary powers; working
of different administrative bodies, for example, becomes imperative. A continuous
research into the policies and administrative processes and the way in which
discretionary powers are exercised is necessary to bring permissible uniformity in the
administrative processes and procedures and to prevent abuse of discretionary powers
by the administrative authorities. Such an inquiry is also necessary to make
administration efficient and purposeful.
Judicial process can also be an area of research. Courts, at least in Common Law
Jurisdictions, do not only interpret law but also create law through their judicial
pronouncements. Judges, as adjudicators, also invariably highlight inbuilt weaknesses
and shortcomings of law in their judicial deliberations. However, it is conceded that
judicial pronouncements, howsoever they are claimed to be objective, in ultimate
analysis, contain an element of subjectivity. Invariably, a judgment reflects
personality and judicial background and philosophy of the judge. It therefore becomes
necessary to carry out research into some of the pertinent questions that associate with
judicial process. Some of them are: Do courts make law?; Should they make law?;
how should they make law?; What are the limits within which they are expected to
make law?; What is their family, educational and social background?, and What kind
of personal, social and judicial philosophy they hold and preach?
Lawyers play a pivotal role in the decision-making process. Lawyers appearing in a
case in fact feed the judge with relevant authorities and policy-oriented arguments.
Therefore, a study of social and educational background of lawyers and of their

26
training carries significance in understanding the decision-making process and
judicial process.
Behavioral studies of lawyers and judges, therefore, become necessary to appreciate
the realities of judicial process. Similarly, it becomes necessary to methodologically
scrutinize the materials used by them in the decision-making process and the
theoretical, social and philosophical premises used therefor. Ideally, judicial decision
requires three types of research inputs, the conceptual or ideological, the doctrinal,
and the empirical. Such a study would demystify the judicial process and thereby
would built up greater legitimacy of the judicial processes and strengthen peoples’
respect for the courts’ as justice institutions. If social audit of judicial performance is
desirable, legal research becomes unavoidable.
Legal research, therefore, takes into its ambit:
1. Doctrinal Research- It is a research into legal rules, principles, concepts or
doctrines. It involves a rigorous systematic exposition, analysis and critical
evaluation of legal rules, principles or doctrines and their inter-
relationship. It arranges the existing law in order and provides thematic
parameters for such an order. It also concerns with critical review of
legislations and of decisional processes and their underlying policy.
2. Research in theory- It involves an inquiry into conceptual bases of legal
rules, principles or doctrines. It provides stimulus and intellectual
infrastructure for empirical research as well as for advancements in law
through legislative, judicial and administrative process.
3. Empirical investigations- It assesses impact of law and reveals the gap
between legal idealism and social reality. Perceiving the idea of law as a
social phenomenon, a researcher explores social, political, economic and
cultural dimensions or implications of law.
4. Reform-oriented Research- It, based on empirical study and critical
examination of law, recommends changes in law and legal institutions.23
23
See generally, Dennis Pearce, Enid Campbell, & Don Harding, Australian Law Schools: A Discipline
Assessment for the Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission (AGPS, 1987) and Harry Arthurs,
Law and Learning: Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada by the
Consultative Group on Research and Education in Law (1983).

27
These broad categories of legal research, which can be conveniently re-grouped into
doctrinal legal research and non-doctrinal legal research, obviously are not mutually
exclusive. They overlap each other.
2.5.2 Scope of Legal Research in the Common Law System and the Civil Law
System
At this juncture, it is necessary to have some broad, but pertinent, observations about
the nature and scope of legal research in the common law and civil law systems.
In the common law system, Legislature enacts substantive law. Executive wing of a
State, drawing authorization from a substantive law, supplements the substantive law
in the form of rules, regulations, statutory orders, notifications and byelaws. While
courts, as and when called upon, interpret the ‘law’ and gives finality to it through
their judicial pronouncements. Courts, particularly higher ones, however, do not only
‘apply’ law to the ‘facts’ and ‘issues’ brought and agitated before them but also,
through their judicial pronouncements, ‘make’ law.24
They are, generally, bestowed
with wide judicial discretion. They are empowered to determine ‘legality’ as well as
adjudicate ‘finality’ of ‘law’ or ‘legal provision’. The lower courts are bound by
‘precedent’. In the common law system, therefore, the basic assumption is that if there
is a judicial decision in the past having facts and legal issues similar to those in the
case currently before the court, the outcome of the past case should control the
outcome of the present case. Therefore, in the common law system Legislature,
Executive as well as Judiciary do constitute ‘source’ of law. A legal researcher, with a
view to understanding ‘law’ on a particular topic or subject, therefore has to ‘locate’,
‘appreciate’ and analyze apt Acts of Parliament, subsidiary legislative instruments, if
any, and judicial pronouncements. He has to focus his attention on the primary source
materials, like the Constitution and Statutes (along with statutory instruments), and
leading judicial pronouncements (the precedents).
24
See, Benjamin Cardozo, the Nature of Judicial Process (Yale University Press, 1921). Also reprinted
in, Margaret E Hall (ed), Selected Writings of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (Fallon Publications, New
York, 1947) 107 et. seq.

28
By contrast, in the civil law system, Acts of Parliament, supplemented by appropriate
Regulations and Directives, if any, do constitute ‘primary’ sources of ‘law’. Courts
are required only to ‘apply’ them. In no way, they are expected to ‘make’ law through
their judicial pronouncements. Hence, the law of precedent, unlike in common law
jurisdictions, is irrelevant. Nevertheless, a judicial statement of a higher court may
have an inspirational or persuasive value in terms of its reasoning. In civil law system,
a legal researcher, with a view understanding law on a topic, therefore, has to merely
concentrate on the primary sources of law
.
However, there is hardly any material difference in the nature and scope of legal
research in these two legal systems- the common law and the civil law system. In both
the systems, broad strategy and utility of legal research is alike. They only differ in
their emphasis on the material required/used for carrying out legal research. A legal
researcher from the common law jurisdiction relies heavily upon, and gives
importance to, apt statutory materials (the Constitution, statutes and other statutory
instruments) and case reports (including case comments and case digests) for
‘ascertaining’, ‘understanding’ and ‘appreciating’ law on the topic or area of his
inquiry. A legal researcher from a civil law system, on the other hand, focuses and
prominently relies on the statutory materials for ‘ascertaining’, ‘understanding’, and
‘appreciating’ law. Under both the legal systems, a researcher has to resort to identical
methods of data collection and of analysis when he is interested in highlighting ‘social
dimension of law’ or ‘gap’ between the legal idealism and social reality or assessing
‘impact of law’ on the social behavioral pattern. In other words, the strategy and
paradigm of socio-legal research in both the systems are similar. Ethiopia is a civil
law country. Nevertheless, the Ethiopian legal system exhibits some common law
elements.
In fact, foreign Commissions, headed by the persons having influence of continental
civil and English common law, drafted the following six basic Codes, which
constitute the real body of law of Ethiopia. They are: (i) the Penal Code of 1957
(drafted by the Commission headed by Professor Jean Graven of Switzerland); (ii) the
Civil Code of 1960 (drafted by the Commission headed by Professor R David of
France); (iii) the Maritime Code of 1960 (drafted by the Commission headed by
Professor J Escarra of France); (iv) the Commercial Code of 1960 (drafted by the

29
Commission headed by Professor J. Escarra of France and A. Jauffret of France); (v)
the Criminal Procedure Code of 1961 (drafted by the Commission headed by Sir
Charles Matthews of England), and (vi) the Civil Procedure Code of 1965 (drafted by
the Commission headed by Ato Nirayo Esayas, Assistant Minister of Codification of
the Ethiopian Ministry of Justice). Though some of these Codes are subsequently
modified and revised, their basic framework remained intact.
Further, though the common law doctrine of stare decisis is not applicable in
Ethiopia, it would be of interest to note that the recently enacted Proclamation No.
454/200525
inserted sub-Article (4) in Article 10 of the Proclamation No. 25/199626
to
explicitly make decisions of the cassation division of the Federal Supreme Court
binding on federal and regional council at all levels. It also, in a way, statutorily
recognized the power of the cassation division to overrule its earlier decisions. The
newly inserted sub-Article (4) runs as under:
Interpretation of a low (sic) by the Federal Supreme Court rendered by
the cassation division with not less than five judges shall be binding on
federal as well as regional council at all levels. The cassation division
may however render a different legal interpretation some other time.27
It would be of further interest to note here that the Proclamation of 454/2005 also
inserted Sub-Article (5) in Article 10 of the Proclamation 95/1996 to mandate the
Federal Supreme Court to publish and distribute decisions of the Cassation Division
having such binding character. It says:
The Federal Supreme Court shall publish and distribute decisions of
the cassation division that contain binding interpretation of laws to all
levels of courts and other relevant bodies.28
25
Federal Courts Proclamation Reamendment Proclamation No. 454/2005, Federal Negarit Gazeta,
11th
Year No. 42, 14th
June, 2005, p 3121.
26
Federal Courts Proclamation No. 25/1996’, Federal Negarit Gazeta, 2nd
Year No. 13, 15th
February,
1996, p 129.
27
See, Article 2(1).
28
Id. The Journal of Ethiopian Law of the Faculty of Law of the Addis Ababa University has also
started publishing (selective) decisions of Cassation Division from its issue of 2006. Since 1964, the
Faculty of Law of the Haile Sellassie I University (now Addis Ababa University) began to collect and

30
Thus, the Ethiopian legal system has, thus, some common law elements too.
2.6 IMPORTANCE (PURPOSE) OF LEGAL RESEARCH
29
Law, as mentioned earlier, does not operate in a vacuum. It operates in a complex
‘social setting’. It reflects social attitudes and behavior. It also seeks to mould and
control social attitudes and behavior of people to ensure that they flow the expected
channel. However, social values and attitudes, existing as well as expected, keep on
changing. It makes the law to be dynamic and cope with the changing social ethos.
Further, ongoing scientific and technological developments add to these complexities
by creating new complex human relationship that needs law to regulate.30
In such situations, legal research, inter alia, becomes necessary: (i) for ascertainment
of law on a given topic or subject, (ii) to highlight ambiguities and inbuilt weaknesses
of law, (iii) to critically examine legal provisions, principles or doctrines with a view
to see consistency, coherence and stability of law and its underlying policy, (iv) to
undertake social audit of law with a view to highlighting its pre-legislative ‘forces’
and post-legislative ‘impacts’, and (v) to make suggestions for improvements in, and
development of, law.
2.6.1 Ascertainment of law
It is needless to mention that laws can never be perfect and final in a dynamic society.
‘If our numerous laws’, a scholar observed, ‘were perfect, if social control were
automatic, legal scholarship, like the State of the Marxists, could be left to wither
away’. ‘But our laws’, according to him, ‘are not perfect and final, and cannot be so in
a dynamic society: they are not always even intelligible, and if intelligible, not always
intelligently made.’31
Therefore, a systematic effort is required to ascertain or find law
on a given subject/topic. He requires not only to locate and to look into relevant
publish in its Ethiopian Law Journal a few select judgments of the appellate courts on irregular basis.
See, its various issues.
29
Also see, ‘Unit 3: Doctrinal and Non-doctrinal Legal Research’, infra.
30
For example, recent developments in science, such as ‘test-tube baby’ and ‘human cloning’, have
compelled law to address to parent-hood and property rights.
31
B A Wortley, Some Reflections on Legal Research After Thirty Years, 7 Jr of the Society of Public
Teachers of Law (New Series) 249-250 (1964-1965).

31
Act(s) of Parliament but also to locate relevant secondary legislative instruments in
the form of rules, regulations, orders, directions, notifications, and byelaws and
judicial pronouncements thereon. It is a matter of common experience that these
legislative instruments are scattered and are not easily traceable. More than one Acts
may have bearing on the topic under study. He, therefore, needs to be more careful in
locating these laws. Most of the subsidiary legislative instruments are not published
on time in Official Gazette. Most of the times they are published after they have come
into force. A plethora of judicial pronouncements of different higher judicial
institutions including of the apex court adds to the difficulty in ascertainment of law.
He needs to locate, analyze and digest these judicial pronouncements. Finding law on
a particular topic or subject, thus, is not a simple task, as it seems to be. It involves
intensive analysis of legal instruments and judicial pronouncements. Further, there is
a constant stream of statutes (with often amendments), statutory rules, directives and
orders, and judicial decisions flowing at a tremendous speed in a modern welfare
State.
2.6.2 Highlighting inbuilt ‘gaps’ and ‘ambiguities’
No legal language or phrase, howsoever a legal drafter may be vigilant, visionary and
skilled craftsman, can be perfect and be capable to take forever into its ambit all the
future contingencies and circumstances. Sometimes, a provision may not, in terms of
its phraseology or pragmatic operation, aptly fit into overall legislative intent of the
Act or match with its other provisions or provisions of other Acts.
A legal researcher, through systematic analysis, may be able to highlight these ‘gaps’
and inbuilt weaknesses of the Act or its provisions.
2.6.3 Determining consistency, coherence and stability of law
A legal researcher, through critical examination of legal propositions, rules and
doctrines embodied therein, in the light of interpretations thereof and legislative
policy of the statute, can, with apt analysis and supporting reasoning, exhibit
consistency and coherence or otherwise of a given law. Such an analysis helps in the
development of law, legal provision or doctrine, as the case may be.

32
2.6.4 Social auditing of law
Legal research is also necessary for taking pre-legislative social audit of law as it
helps to understand and appreciate the social forces that played significant role in the
making of given law in its present form. Such an understanding enables us to know
the social stakes that law intends to protect or change and reasons therefor. It helps to
appreciate underpinning of the given law and its legislative target and strategy. While
post-legislation social auditing helps us to identify ‘gap(s)’, if any, between the ‘legal
ideal’ and the ‘social reality’ and to know reasons or factors responsible therefor.
Such an audit helps us to find out as to whether a given law is assimilated in the
society and is (or is not) serving the needs of the society. It also unravels the reasons
or factors that are responsible for making a given law a mere symbolic or a failure in
attaining its intended legislative goal(s). It also enables us to predict future of the law.
2.6.5 Suggesting reforms in law
In the light of underlying legislative policy of a Statute and the highlighted inbuilt
weaknesses or inconsistencies thereof, a legal researcher can easily offer concrete
suggestions or proposals for reform or improvement in the given law. By undertaking
analytical, historical and comparative research, he can also formulate his proposals for
reform in precise terms. Analytical research, as stated above, is concerned with the
ascertainment of law. It deals with the present. Historical research, on the other hand,
deals with the past and it involves an inquiry into historical antecedents and evolution
of law. The past often explains the present, most vividly. It reveals different
alternative legislative measures, other than the current ones, thought of when the law
was in the making. It discloses the reasons for their rejection and for adoption of the
present ones. Historical research often shows that a particular existing legal provision,
rule or doctrine, fully justifiable at the time when it was introduced or adapted, is no
longer so justifiable because the reasons or circumstances that justified the original
inclusion of that provision, rule or doctrine are no longer valid or exist. While
comparative research aims at finding parallels from other jurisdictions. Thus,
analytical [i.e., finding the existing law]; historical [i.e., finding out the previous law
in order to understand the reasons behind the existing law and the course of
evolution], and comparative [i.e., finding out what the law is in other countries, and

33
considering whether it can be adapted, with or without modifications] lead to law
reforms or development of law.32
Legal research, to sum up, needs to be carried out for the following reasons:
1. To ascertain laws on a given topic or subject.
2. To identify ‘gaps’ and ‘ambiguities’ in law.
3. To critically examine consistency, coherence and stability of law and legal
propositions.
4. To undertake ‘social auditing of law’ [i.e. auditing pre-Legislative ‘forces’ and
post-Legislative ‘impacts’ of law].
5. To suggest reforms/developments in law by undertakings research intended:
i. To investigate ‘gap’ between the ‘legal ideals’ and ‘actual
practice’.
ii. To understand ‘effectiveness’ or ‘impact’ of law in a given social
set-up at a given time.
iii. To find out as to whether law is serving the needs of the society
and has a social value.
iv. To make suggestions for improvements in the law on concrete
formulations and proposals.
v. To predict future trends of law.
vi.
? Activity 2.4: 1.What will be the potential importance of each of the research
conducted in the papers mentioned above under activity 2.2? Discuss in groups.
2. Discuss the significances of conducting relevant research to :( a) the
legislative process in the Federal House of People’s Representatives and Regional
Councils or law makers in Ethiopia ; (b)Federal and Regional Courts in the
process of rendering effective, efficient and predictable judgments. It is to be
discussed in class in the form of examples for importance of legal research in the
Ethiopian justice system.
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
32
For further details, see P M Bakshi, Legal Research and Law Reform, in S K Verma & M Afzal
Wani (eds), Legal Research and Methodology (Indian Law Institute, New Delhi, 2nd
edn, 2001) 111.

34
2.7 WHO DOES LEGAL RESEARCH?
Obviously, anyone, who is curious to ‘know’ something about a particular ‘law’
and/or its operational facets and is willing to work hard to ‘know’ or ‘unearth’ it, can
be a legal researcher. He may be a sociologist, an historian, a political scientist, a
social anthropologist, an economist, or a legal philosopher.
But as an occupational exercise, legal research needs to be undertaken by Legislators,
Judges, Lawyers, and Legal Academia (law teachers and students).33
In fact, the
nature of professional commitment forces these persons to get themselves indulged
into legal research, though for a living, besides improvement of their profession and
achieving the purpose of legal research.
2.7.1 By a Legislator
Law is not sui generis. Legislators do not legislate at random. They also do not
legislate simply because they are authorized or obligated to enact laws. Under normal
circumstances, the exercise of legislative power by them is neither ex tempore nor by
accident. They enact ‘law’ deliberately to meet one of the prevalent ‘needs’ of the
society. A legislative enactment, therefore, has some ‘social purpose’ behind it.
Legislators have to decide the areas that are susceptible to legislative treatment. They
have also to decide as to whether the proposed legislative measure improves the state
of things or the existing social practice. Formulation of a legislative measure,
generally, precedes a deliberate ‘finding’ of a ‘problem’ requiring legislative
response. Then it follows by ‘finding’ apt possible alternative courses of action to be
followed or measures to be taken and a careful comparative assessment of efficacy of
each one of the identified alternatives for bringing about the ‘intended’ results through
law. Legislators opt for the legislative measure, when, in their wisdom, none of the
identified and available alternative measures are either adequate or apt to bring the
desired results. Theoretically, then (and only then), the Lawmakers are expected to
33
See, Frederick C Hicks, Materials and Methods of Legal Research (1942, Reprint 1959) 23-31.

35
opt, as an alternative to the identified non-legal measures, for the legal measure as a
last resort.
Lawmakers, therefore, are expected, as a part of their professional commitment, to
make a systematic search for the possible alternatives to the proposed legislative
measure and to make a serious and meticulous comparative assessment of efficacy
and viability of each one of the identified alternatives for handling the problem. They
are also expected to make a cautious assessment of probable ‘social response’ and
‘social consequences’- positive as well as negative- of the proposed legislative
measure.
Lawmakers may also have to ‘look’ at the ‘identical law’ and its ‘raison d’etre’, if
any, prevailing in other countries while designing legislative framework of the
proposed law. They may have also to seriously look at the ‘failure’ and/or ‘success’ of
such ‘foreign law’ and to identify the factors responsible therefor, if any, so that they
can do way with the factors while drafting the law at their hand. This obviously
requires them to have, at least, working skill of ‘locating’ and ‘assessing’ of the law
from foreign jurisdiction. Such a search will enable them to identify the basic
principles, doctrines and legislative strategy adopted in the identical overseas law and
thereby to perceive the feasibility of adopting, with necessary modifications, them in
the proposed legislation. Similar is the case when they want to amend either the
existing legislation or a statutory provision or to repeal it.
The collection, collation and weighing of ‘alternatives’ and of ‘information’ abo ut a
legal issue or proposed law or amendment, obviously, is a research-exercise. To what
extent legislators actually and fruitfully engage themselves in the research-exercise is
a different matter.
The Legislators’ selection of a particular legal alternative may be influenced, rather
dictated, by various considerations. A prominent among them would be their: socio-
politico-cultural background; perception of the ‘social problem’ and ‘public policy’
involved therein, and attached thereto; attitude and sensitivity to the perceived

36
problem; political or personal vested interests, political strategy; and ideology and
commitment to the political party they belong to.34
Nevertheless, our experience tells that Legislators, in most of the jurisdictions, hardly
make any serious efforts to ‘articulate’ either legislative policy or legal framework of
the proposed law or of amendments to the existing ones. Majority of the laws are
passed on the floor of the House with no or less debate.
However, probably keeping in view the pressure on their time and energy as well as
their less or no aptitude and skill for undertaking research, a practice of carrying such
an inquiry, on behalf of the Legislators, by a (Law) Commission and/or (Ad-hoc)
Committee is developed in almost all the modern democratic states.
2.7.2 By a Judge
Traditionally, a Judge, who essentially acts as an arbiter, has to find the most relevant
rules and principles of law from statutes and statutory instruments argued by the
contesting parties, and to apply them to the controversy or lis brought before him. He
is expected to ‘find’ propositions and principles of ‘law’ and to decide their
‘propriety’ and ‘applicability’ to the ‘dispute’ at hand. Such an exercise obviously
requires him to make a ‘search’ for applicable ‘rule’ and ‘legal principle’. He has also
to give ‘reasons’ for picking up a ‘rule’ as an ‘appropriate’ one and logic behind it.
An appellate judge, while upholding or reversing a judgment of a court subordinate to
him, is also expected to make a search for ‘true’ interpretation of the ‘rule’ applied
therein and to change, if necessary, the ‘previous misconstrued rule’ or
‘misinterpretation’ thereof.
However, the nature and extent of ‘research’ by a judge depend upon ‘issues’
involved before him and his inclination, aptitude, and training. Similarly, the
hierarchical status of the court he sits on, nature of the matter or lis involved, and his
workload determine the intensity of the required research. The hierarchical structure
of the judicial institutions provides little or no scope for research to a Judge of a trial
34
See, John C Wahlke and Heinz Eulau (eds), Legislative Behavior-A Reader in Theory and Research
(Free Press of Glencoe, Illinois, 1959).

37
court or of a court of first instance as the matter brought before him is comparatively
trivial in nature and stake of the parties involved therein is not that serious. The
research output of an appellate court judge and of a judge of the higher court or an
apex court or a constitutional court or Cassation Court is high as the issues brought
before him are of legally as well as politically significant. Judges of the higher
judicial institutions also have the required aptitude, skill, time, and ability for making
such a ‘search’ as well as for supplementing the existing rules and legal principles
with their innovative analogy and logical reasoning. A Judge, it is said, injects ‘life’
into ‘law’ through his logical deduction and legal reasoning. Most of the times, as
evident from our experience, such reasoning and logical deductions have not only
boosted further development of legal rules and principles but have also culminated
into some pertinent theories and legal doctrines. A student of law has umpteen
number judicial opinions in his memory that not only exhibit high scholarship of the
judges but also have led to theories and legal doctrines of far reaching consequences.
However, it is significant to recall that a Judge cannot on his own either ascertain law
or legal principles or apply them unless someone calls upon him to do so by invoking
his jurisdiction. In this sense, he is merely a ‘passive’ legal researcher.
2.7.3 By a Lawyer
A practicing lawyer, as profession, has to advise his clients and to plead cases on their
behalf in the court of law. He, sometimes, is also required to give legal opinion on the
matter referred to him by his client. A legal practitioner, who is called upon to give
his legal opinion, is also required, as a part of his profession, to undertake a
systematic search for ‘finding’ law and thereby to form his ‘opinion’ based thereon. In
order to discharge these professional commitments, a lawyer has obviously to engage
himself in searching law, propositions of law, and precedent (if required).
However, at times, finding law on a particular topic or issue is not an easy task. A
number of statutes and/or statutory provisions on the given topic; frequent
amendments thereto; enormous subsidiary legislation in the form of rules, regulations,
orders, notifications, or byelaws supplementing the substantive law make the task of
finding law more difficult. Pouring judicial pronouncements create further difficulties

38
for the lawyer in his efforts to know law. Further, most of the times, Legislature,
advertently or inadvertently, draft law in an imperfect language or couch a legal
provision with phraseology that can be subjected to equally convincing more than one
interpretation. A lawyer, therefore, has to go into the legislative policy and intent of
law for ‘knowing’ the law accurately and identifying and appreciating the underlying
legal principles so that he can argue favorably for his client. His client expects him
not only to give right advice but also to impress upon the judge and convince him that
his legal propositions are sounder than that of his opponent and hence correct.
For making his arguments more effective and convincing, he has obviously to explore
and expound aims, objects, policy goals, scope and pragmatic aspects of the
applicable legal provision(s). He, therefore, needs to scan statutory and judicial
material and also materials comprising the history of the legal provision(s).
A Practicing Counsel who advises his client to go in appeal against an unfavorable
decision of the lower court, in reality, believes that the reasoning given by the lower
court was less or no-convincing and was not in tune with the thitherto prevalent
legislative policy and judicial interpretation. Therefore, he trusts that his reasoning is
better than that of the court below.
A scholar, reflecting on the nature of legal research to be carried out by a lawyer as a
part of his profession, observed:
It is a misconception to think that legal research is only for theoretician
or academician and not for lawyer. --- As the attributes of research are
fact-finding (that is, what the law is on a particular subject), fact-
ordering, fact-systematizing and studying and predicting legal trends,
the lawyers are constantly engaged in research. Further, a lawyer has to
do research to find as to how the law should be interpreted, since the
law is, at times, expressed in ambiguous language and leaves gaps to
be filled in, during the process of its application, from case to case, and
is not easily knowable. Perhaps in the days gone by when the
economic life was simple, laws were not too many, and the life of the
individual was not so much regulated by the state, all this resulting in

39
the ascendancy of private law controversies (as contrasted with public
law controversies), a lawyer could manage by the knowledge of a few
professional tools, (which he was ordinarily expected to know) and did
not need much research to win a case for his client. But all this has
changed now. Firstly, there are too many statutes on a particular
subject with frequent amendments thereto. --- Secondly, apart from the
statutes, rules and statutory orders are much more in bulk and quantity.
The latter are equally, and sometimes more, important than the relevant
statute itself. --- Thirdly, the case law is also becoming prolific ---.
Fourthly, in many areas of government regulation of private
enterprises and in constitutional and administrative law questions,
where our law is still in the developing stages, a lawyer is required to
do research in comparative law to comprehend the meaning of the
words and to interpret them. Fifthly, many questions in the present
complex of socio-economic life, ---, raise difficult policy questions and
a lawyer is required to traverse beyond legal doctrines and
propositions.35
However, unfortunately most of the practicing lawyers lack the ability, aptitude and
inclination for such a painstaking legal research. Probably, the nature of cases they
handle are of routine nature and do not warrant such a serious legal research.
Nevertheless, role of a lawyer as a researcher, compared with an academician, in legal
research is limited. He undertakes legal research only when a client approaches to
him. His research is also coloured by the need to win the case at hand. He, therefore,
lacks a wider perspective, objectivity and ability to draw a line on the graph depicting
the development of the law and to make predictions about law in his professional
career. Nevertheless, his well-matched intellectual acumen, policy-orientation, and
social awareness may, undoubtedly, result (an often results) in articulating and
advancing superb arguments. It certainly leads to the development of law.
35
S N Jain, Legal Research and Methodology, supra n 15, at pp 487-488.

Legal Research Methods

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Legal Research Methods

Similar to Legal Research Methods (20)

More from Preeti Sikder

More from Preeti Sikder (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Legal Research Methods