SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 83
Download to read offline
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
Pietro Porqueddu
University of Pisa
03/02/2017
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 1 / 37
Introduction
In 1992, Timothy Gowers provided a positive answer to the oscillation
stability problem in c0.
The very core of the proof is a combinatorial argument which represents a
very important result in Ramsey Theory known as Gowers’ Ramsey
Theorem.
One of the typical problems is Ramsey Theory is to determine whether
some structure is preserved when it is partitioned (coloured).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 2 / 37
The distortion problem
Let (E, · ) be a Banach space and λ > 1 a real number. We say that E
is λ-distortable if there exists an equivalent norm | · | on E such that for
every infinite-dimensional vector subspace X of E,
sup
|x|
|y|
| x, y ∈ X and ||x|| = ||y|| = 1 ≥ λ.
We say that E is distortable if it is λ-distortable for some λ > 1, and it is
arbitrarily distortable if it is λ-distortable for every λ > 1.
The question of whether a Banach space is distortable or not is called the
distortion problem.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 3 / 37
The distortion problem
Let (E, · ) be a Banach space and λ > 1 a real number. We say that E
is λ-distortable if there exists an equivalent norm | · | on E such that for
every infinite-dimensional vector subspace X of E,
sup
|x|
|y|
| x, y ∈ X and ||x|| = ||y|| = 1 ≥ λ.
We say that E is distortable if it is λ-distortable for some λ > 1, and it is
arbitrarily distortable if it is λ-distortable for every λ > 1.
The question of whether a Banach space is distortable or not is called the
distortion problem.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 3 / 37
The distortion problem
R.C. James (1964) proved that c0 and 1 are not distortable.
V. Milman (1971) proved that a non-distortable space must contain
an isomorphic copy of c0 or p, 1 ≤ p < ∞.
The problem in the case of separable Hilbert spaces and for p, for
any 1 < p < ∞, was solved affirmatively by E. Odell and T.
Schlumprecht (1994).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 4 / 37
The distortion problem
R.C. James (1964) proved that c0 and 1 are not distortable.
V. Milman (1971) proved that a non-distortable space must contain
an isomorphic copy of c0 or p, 1 ≤ p < ∞.
The problem in the case of separable Hilbert spaces and for p, for
any 1 < p < ∞, was solved affirmatively by E. Odell and T.
Schlumprecht (1994).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 4 / 37
The distortion problem
R.C. James (1964) proved that c0 and 1 are not distortable.
V. Milman (1971) proved that a non-distortable space must contain
an isomorphic copy of c0 or p, 1 ≤ p < ∞.
The problem in the case of separable Hilbert spaces and for p, for
any 1 < p < ∞, was solved affirmatively by E. Odell and T.
Schlumprecht (1994).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 4 / 37
The oscillation stability problem
In a Banach space (E, · ), the oscillation stability problem is the
question of whether or not, given > 0, for every real-valued Lipschitz
function f on the unit sphere SE there exists an infinite-dimensional
subspace X of E on the unit sphere of which f varies by at almost , i.e.,
whether there is a real number a ∈ R and an infinite-dimensional subspace
X of E such that ||a − f (x)|| < for all x ∈ X with ||x|| = 1.
In a separable and uniform convex Banach space (such as the p spaces for
1 < p < ∞), the distortion problem and the oscillation stability problem
are equivalent.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 5 / 37
The oscillation stability problem
In a Banach space (E, · ), the oscillation stability problem is the
question of whether or not, given > 0, for every real-valued Lipschitz
function f on the unit sphere SE there exists an infinite-dimensional
subspace X of E on the unit sphere of which f varies by at almost , i.e.,
whether there is a real number a ∈ R and an infinite-dimensional subspace
X of E such that ||a − f (x)|| < for all x ∈ X with ||x|| = 1.
In a separable and uniform convex Banach space (such as the p spaces for
1 < p < ∞), the distortion problem and the oscillation stability problem
are equivalent.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 5 / 37
Gowers’ Theorem
Theorem
Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere
of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit
sphere of which F varies by at most .
The strategy of the proof is to find explicit generators of such a subspace
taken among the maps which belong to a δ-net on Sc0 .
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 6 / 37
Gowers’ Theorem
Theorem
Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere
of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit
sphere of which F varies by at most .
The strategy of the proof is to find explicit generators of such a subspace
taken among the maps which belong to a δ-net on Sc0 .
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 6 / 37
What we will see
• In the first part, we will introduce the notions of ultrafilter and
semigroup, and some of their properties.
• In the second part, we will prove Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem.
• Finally, we will see Gowers’ solution of the oscillation stability problem in
c0 as a consequence of Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 7 / 37
Semigroups
Definition
A semigroup is a nonempty set S with a map
· : S2
−→ S
defined for all x, y ∈ S, that satisfies the associative law
(x · y) · z = x · (y · z)
Usually we will drop the · and we will write xy instead of x · y.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 8 / 37
Ideals and subsemigroups
Definition
A compact left-semigroup is a nonempty semigroup S with a compact
Hausdorff topology such that, for all x ∈ S, the map
λx : y −→ xy
is continuous for all y. A subset T ⊆ S is a (compact) subsemigroup of S
if it is a compact left-semigroup as subspace of S.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 9 / 37
Idempotents and Ellis’ Theorem
Definition
An element x ∈ S is idempotent if and only if x2 = x.
Theorem (Ellis’ Theorem)
Every compact left-semigroup S has an idempotent.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 10 / 37
Idempotents and Ellis’ Theorem
Definition
An element x ∈ S is idempotent if and only if x2 = x.
Theorem (Ellis’ Theorem)
Every compact left-semigroup S has an idempotent.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 10 / 37
Filters and ultrafilters
Definition
Let S be a set. A family F of subsets of S is a filter on S if
1 ∅ /∈ F and S ∈ F;
2 If A, B ∈ F, then A ∩ B ∈ F;
3 If A ∈ F and A ⊆ B, then B ∈ F.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 11 / 37
Filters and ultrafilters
Proposition
Let S be a set and F a filter on S. The following are equivalent
1 If A /∈ F, then Ac ∈ F;
2 If A1 ∪ . . . ∪ An ∈ F, then there exists i such that Ai ∈ F;
3 F is maximal respect to the inclusion, i.e. if G is a filter on S and
F ⊆ G, then F = G.
Definition
A filter F on a set S which satisfies one, and then all, of the properties of
the above proposition is called ultrafilter.
We will denote by βS the set of all ultrafilters on S.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 12 / 37
Filters and ultrafilters
Proposition
Let S be a set and F a filter on S. The following are equivalent
1 If A /∈ F, then Ac ∈ F;
2 If A1 ∪ . . . ∪ An ∈ F, then there exists i such that Ai ∈ F;
3 F is maximal respect to the inclusion, i.e. if G is a filter on S and
F ⊆ G, then F = G.
Definition
A filter F on a set S which satisfies one, and then all, of the properties of
the above proposition is called ultrafilter.
We will denote by βS the set of all ultrafilters on S.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 12 / 37
Filters and ultrafilters
Proposition
Let S be a set and F a filter on S. The following are equivalent
1 If A /∈ F, then Ac ∈ F;
2 If A1 ∪ . . . ∪ An ∈ F, then there exists i such that Ai ∈ F;
3 F is maximal respect to the inclusion, i.e. if G is a filter on S and
F ⊆ G, then F = G.
Definition
A filter F on a set S which satisfies one, and then all, of the properties of
the above proposition is called ultrafilter.
We will denote by βS the set of all ultrafilters on S.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 12 / 37
The space βS
Definition
On βS we define the topology generated by the (cl)open set basis
B = {OA | A ⊆ S}
where OA = {U ultrafilter on S | A ∈ U}
Theorem
The space βS is the Stone-ˇCech compactification of the discrete space S:
1 βS is a compact Hausdorff space;
2 S is a dense discrete subset of βS;
3 for any compact Hausdorff space K and any f : S → K, there exists
an unique continuous extension ¯f : βS → K.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 13 / 37
The space βS
Definition
On βS we define the topology generated by the (cl)open set basis
B = {OA | A ⊆ S}
where OA = {U ultrafilter on S | A ∈ U}
Theorem
The space βS is the Stone-ˇCech compactification of the discrete space S:
1 βS is a compact Hausdorff space;
2 S is a dense discrete subset of βS;
3 for any compact Hausdorff space K and any f : S → K, there exists
an unique continuous extension ¯f : βS → K.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 13 / 37
The space βS
Theorem
Let (S, ·) be a compact semigroup. There exists a unique associative
binary operation ∗ : βS × βS → βS satisfying the following conditions
1 For every x, y ∈ S, x ∗ y = x · y;
2 For each V ∈ βS, the function pV : βS × βS → βS is continuous,
where pV(U) = U ∗ V;
3 For each x ∈ S, the function qx : βS × βS → βS is continuous,
where qx (V) = x ∗ V.
Proposition
Let U, V be ultrafilters in βS. Then
A ∈ U ∗ V ⇔ {x ∈ S | {y ∈ S | x · y ∈ A} ∈ V} ∈ U.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 14 / 37
The space βS
Theorem
Let (S, ·) be a compact semigroup. There exists a unique associative
binary operation ∗ : βS × βS → βS satisfying the following conditions
1 For every x, y ∈ S, x ∗ y = x · y;
2 For each V ∈ βS, the function pV : βS × βS → βS is continuous,
where pV(U) = U ∗ V;
3 For each x ∈ S, the function qx : βS × βS → βS is continuous,
where qx (V) = x ∗ V.
Proposition
Let U, V be ultrafilters in βS. Then
A ∈ U ∗ V ⇔ {x ∈ S | {y ∈ S | x · y ∈ A} ∈ V} ∈ U.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 14 / 37
Algebra in βS
Proposition
The ultrafilter product U ∗ V has the following properties
1 (U ∗ V) ∗ W = U ∗ (V ∗ W);
2 V → U ∗ V is a continuous map from βS into βS for every U.
Corollary
The space (βS, ∗) is a compact left-semigroup.
Corollary
There exist idempotent ultrafilters in (βS, ∗).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 15 / 37
Algebra in βS
Proposition
The ultrafilter product U ∗ V has the following properties
1 (U ∗ V) ∗ W = U ∗ (V ∗ W);
2 V → U ∗ V is a continuous map from βS into βS for every U.
Corollary
The space (βS, ∗) is a compact left-semigroup.
Corollary
There exist idempotent ultrafilters in (βS, ∗).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 15 / 37
Algebra in βS
Proposition
The ultrafilter product U ∗ V has the following properties
1 (U ∗ V) ∗ W = U ∗ (V ∗ W);
2 V → U ∗ V is a continuous map from βS into βS for every U.
Corollary
The space (βS, ∗) is a compact left-semigroup.
Corollary
There exist idempotent ultrafilters in (βS, ∗).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 15 / 37
The set FIN±
k
Let k be a positive integer. We consider the set FIN±
k of the maps
p : N → {0, ±1, . . . , ±k}
such that supp(p) = {n ∈ N | p(n) = 0} is finite, and p attains at least
one of the values k or −k.
We define on FIN±
k a coordinate-wise sum
(p + q)(n) = p(n) + q(n)
whenever supp(p) ∩ supp(q) = ∅.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 16 / 37
The set FIN±
k
Let k be a positive integer. We consider the set FIN±
k of the maps
p : N → {0, ±1, . . . , ±k}
such that supp(p) = {n ∈ N | p(n) = 0} is finite, and p attains at least
one of the values k or −k.
We define on FIN±
k a coordinate-wise sum
(p + q)(n) = p(n) + q(n)
whenever supp(p) ∩ supp(q) = ∅.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 16 / 37
The set FIN±
k
Let k be a positive integer. We consider the set FIN±
k of the maps
p : N → {0, ±1, . . . , ±k}
such that supp(p) = {n ∈ N | p(n) = 0} is finite, and p attains at least
one of the values k or −k.
We define on FIN±
k a coordinate-wise sum
(p + q)(n) = p(n) + q(n)
whenever supp(p) ∩ supp(q) = ∅.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 16 / 37
Ultrafilters on FIN±
k
The set FIN±
k is an example of partial semigroup.
The construction of a semigroup of ultrafilters (βS, ∗) works also for a
large class of partial semigroups S. In this case, we need to restrict to
cofinite ultrafilters.
Definition
We say that an ultrafilter U on FIN±
k is cofinite if
∀p ∈ FIN±
k , {q ∈ FIN±
k | p + q is defined} ∈ U.
We denote by γFIN±
k the set of all cofinite ultrafilters.
Proposition
The set (γFIN±
k , +) is a compact left-semigroup.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 17 / 37
Ultrafilters on FIN±
k
The set FIN±
k is an example of partial semigroup.
The construction of a semigroup of ultrafilters (βS, ∗) works also for a
large class of partial semigroups S. In this case, we need to restrict to
cofinite ultrafilters.
Definition
We say that an ultrafilter U on FIN±
k is cofinite if
∀p ∈ FIN±
k , {q ∈ FIN±
k | p + q is defined} ∈ U.
We denote by γFIN±
k the set of all cofinite ultrafilters.
Proposition
The set (γFIN±
k , +) is a compact left-semigroup.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 17 / 37
Ultrafilters on FIN±
k
We extend the sum to the partial semigroup
FIN±
[1,k] =
k
i=1
FIN±
i ,
If p ∈ FIN±
k and q ∈ FIN±
h , then p + q ∈ FIN±
max{k,h}.
The correspondent space of ultrafilters is
γ(FIN±
[1,k]) =
k
i=1
γFIN±
i
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 18 / 37
Ultrafilters on FIN±
k
We extend the sum to the partial semigroup
FIN±
[1,k] =
k
i=1
FIN±
i ,
If p ∈ FIN±
k and q ∈ FIN±
h , then p + q ∈ FIN±
max{k,h}.
The correspondent space of ultrafilters is
γ(FIN±
[1,k]) =
k
i=1
γFIN±
i
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 18 / 37
The tetris operation
Definition
We call tetris operation the map T : FIN±
k → FIN±
k−1 defined as
T(p)(n) =



p(n) − 1 if p(n) > 0,
0 if p(n) = 0,
p(n) + 1 if p(n) < 0.
Notice that T(p + q) = T(p) + T(q) whenever p, q have disjoint supports.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 19 / 37
The tetris operation
Definition
We call tetris operation the map T : FIN±
k → FIN±
k−1 defined as
T(p)(n) =



p(n) − 1 if p(n) > 0,
0 if p(n) = 0,
p(n) + 1 if p(n) < 0.
Notice that T(p + q) = T(p) + T(q) whenever p, q have disjoint supports.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 19 / 37
Block sequences
Definition
A basic block sequence B = {bn}n of elements of FIN±
k is any sequence
such that
supp(bi ) < supp(bj ) whenever i < j.
Definition
The partial subsemigroup of FIN±
k generated by a basic block sequence
B = {bn}n is the family of functions of the form
0Tj0
(bn0 ) + 1Tj1
(bn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl
(bnl
),
where i = ±1, n0 < . . . < nl , j0, . . . , jl ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and at least one
of the j0, . . . , jl is equal to zero.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 20 / 37
Block sequences
Definition
A basic block sequence B = {bn}n of elements of FIN±
k is any sequence
such that
supp(bi ) < supp(bj ) whenever i < j.
Definition
The partial subsemigroup of FIN±
k generated by a basic block sequence
B = {bn}n is the family of functions of the form
0Tj0
(bn0 ) + 1Tj1
(bn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl
(bnl
),
where i = ±1, n0 < . . . < nl , j0, . . . , jl ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and at least one
of the j0, . . . , jl is equal to zero.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 20 / 37
Extending the tetris operation
We extend the tetris operation on the space of cofinite ultrafilters as
follows: T : γFIN±
k → γFIN±
k−1 is the function where
T(U) = {A ⊆ FIN±
k−1 | {p ∈ FIN±
k |T(p) ∈ A} ∈ U}.
for all U ∈ γFIN±
k .
Proposition
T : γFIN±
k → γFIN±
k−1 is a continuous onto homomorphism.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 21 / 37
Extending the tetris operation
We extend the tetris operation on the space of cofinite ultrafilters as
follows: T : γFIN±
k → γFIN±
k−1 is the function where
T(U) = {A ⊆ FIN±
k−1 | {p ∈ FIN±
k |T(p) ∈ A} ∈ U}.
for all U ∈ γFIN±
k .
Proposition
T : γFIN±
k → γFIN±
k−1 is a continuous onto homomorphism.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 21 / 37
Subsymmetric ultrafilters
For every A ⊆ FIN±
k and > 0, we define
(A) = {q ∈ FIN±
k | ∃p ∈ A p − q ∞≤ }
Definition
We say that a cofinite ultrafilter U ∈ γFIN±
k is subsymmetric if
−(A)1 ∈ U for all A ∈ U.
We denote by S±
k the set of all subsymmetric ultrafilters on FIN±
k .
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 22 / 37
Subsymmetric ultrafilters
For every A ⊆ FIN±
k and > 0, we define
(A) = {q ∈ FIN±
k | ∃p ∈ A p − q ∞≤ }
Definition
We say that a cofinite ultrafilter U ∈ γFIN±
k is subsymmetric if
−(A)1 ∈ U for all A ∈ U.
We denote by S±
k the set of all subsymmetric ultrafilters on FIN±
k .
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 22 / 37
Subsymmetric ultrafilters
Lemma
The set S±
k is a closed subsemigroup of γFIN±
k .
Lemma
T(U) ∈ S±
k−1 for all U ∈ S±
k .
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 23 / 37
Subsymmetric ultrafilters
Lemma
The set S±
k is a closed subsemigroup of γFIN±
k .
Lemma
T(U) ∈ S±
k−1 for all U ∈ S±
k .
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 23 / 37
Do subsymmetric ultrafilters exist?
Answer: It is claimed by Todorcevic, but he does not prove it in detail.
Lemma
The set S±
k = ∅ for all k ≥ 1.
Todorcevic’s hint.
Let V be a cofinite ultrafilter on FIN±
k . Then
U = Tk−1
(V) − Tk−1
(V) + Tk−2
(V) − Tk−2
(V) + . . . +
+ T(V) − T(V) + V − V + T(V) − T(V) + . . . +
+ Tk−2
(V) − Tk−2
(V) + Tk−1
(V) − Tk−1
(V)
is a subsymmetric ultrafilter.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 24 / 37
Do subsymmetric ultrafilters exist?
Answer: It is claimed by Todorcevic, but he does not prove it in detail.
Lemma
The set S±
k = ∅ for all k ≥ 1.
Todorcevic’s hint.
Let V be a cofinite ultrafilter on FIN±
k . Then
U = Tk−1
(V) − Tk−1
(V) + Tk−2
(V) − Tk−2
(V) + . . . +
+ T(V) − T(V) + V − V + T(V) − T(V) + . . . +
+ Tk−2
(V) − Tk−2
(V) + Tk−1
(V) − Tk−1
(V)
is a subsymmetric ultrafilter.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 24 / 37
Do subsymmetric ultrafilters exist?
Answer: It is claimed by Todorcevic, but he does not prove it in detail.
Lemma
The set S±
k = ∅ for all k ≥ 1.
Todorcevic’s hint.
Let V be a cofinite ultrafilter on FIN±
k . Then
U = Tk−1
(V) − Tk−1
(V) + Tk−2
(V) − Tk−2
(V) + . . . +
+ T(V) − T(V) + V − V + T(V) − T(V) + . . . +
+ Tk−2
(V) − Tk−2
(V) + Tk−1
(V) − Tk−1
(V)
is a subsymmetric ultrafilter.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 24 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
Theorem (Gowers)
For every finite partition of FIN±
k there is a piece P of the partition such
that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN±
k generated by an infinite
basic block sequence.
We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P.
Consider the colourings:
1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then
f and −f have always different colours.
2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign,
BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
Theorem (Gowers)
For every finite partition of FIN±
k there is a piece P of the partition such
that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN±
k generated by an infinite
basic block sequence.
We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P.
Consider the colourings:
1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then
f and −f have always different colours.
2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign,
BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
Theorem (Gowers)
For every finite partition of FIN±
k there is a piece P of the partition such
that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN±
k generated by an infinite
basic block sequence.
We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P.
Consider the colourings:
1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then
f and −f have always different colours.
2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign,
BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
Theorem (Gowers)
For every finite partition of FIN±
k there is a piece P of the partition such
that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN±
k generated by an infinite
basic block sequence.
We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P.
Consider the colourings:
1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then
f and −f have always different colours.
2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign,
BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
To prove Gowers’ Theorem we need the following lemma:
Lemma
There exists a sequence of ultrafilters Uj ∈ S±
j (1 ≤ j ≤ k) such that for
all 1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ k:
(i) Ui + Ui = Ui ;
(ii) Ui + Uj = Uj + Ui = Uj ;
(iii) Tj−i (Uj ) = Ui .
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 26 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
A sketch of the proof:
• Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma.
• Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk.
• Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk.
• We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of
sets {Al
n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n);
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul ;
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n;
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul for
1 ≤ j, l ≤ k.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
A sketch of the proof:
• Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma.
• Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk.
• Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk.
• We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of
sets {Al
n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n);
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul ;
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n;
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul for
1 ≤ j, l ≤ k.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
A sketch of the proof:
• Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma.
• Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk.
• Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk.
• We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of
sets {Al
n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n);
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul ;
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n;
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul for
1 ≤ j, l ≤ k.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
A sketch of the proof:
• Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma.
• Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk.
• Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk.
• We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of
sets {Al
n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n);
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul ;
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n;
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul for
1 ≤ j, l ≤ k.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
A sketch of the proof:
• Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma.
• Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk.
• Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk.
• We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of
sets {Al
n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n);
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul ;
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n;
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul for
1 ≤ j, l ≤ k.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
We can represent the sequence {Al
n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) with this diagram
Ak
0 ⊃ Ak
1 ⊃ . . . ⊃ Ak
n−2 ⊃ Ak
n ∈ Uk
↓T ↓T
Ak−1
0 ⊃ Ak−1
1 ⊃ . . . ⊃ Ak−1
n−2 ⊃ Ak−1
n ∈ Uk−1
↓T ↓T
...
...
↓T ↓T
A1
0 ⊃ A1
1 ⊃ . . . ⊃ A1
n−2 ⊃ A1
n ∈ U1
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 28 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
0Tj0
(xn0 ) + 1Tj1
(xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl
(xnl
),
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n).
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul .
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n.
ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the
generated subspace.
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul .
ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
0Tj0
(xn0 ) + 1Tj1
(xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl
(xnl
),
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n).
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul .
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n.
ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the
generated subspace.
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul .
ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
0Tj0
(xn0 ) + 1Tj1
(xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl
(xnl
),
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n).
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul .
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n.
ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the
generated subspace.
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul .
ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem
0Tj0
(xn0 ) + 1Tj1
(xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl
(xnl
),
1 Ak
0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al
n = Tk−l (Ak
n).
2 Al
n = −Al
n ∈ Ul .
3 ±xn ∈ Ak
n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al
n.
ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the
generated subspace.
4 Cl,j
m = {y ∈ FIN±
l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A
max{l,j}
m } ∈ Ul .
ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Let k be a positive integer and let 0 < δ < 1 be such that
(1 + δ)1−k
= δ.
Let ∆±
k be the family of all maps
f : N → {0, ±(1 + δ)1−k
, ±(1 + δ)2−k
, . . . , ±(1 + δ)−1
, ±1},
which attain at least one of the values ±1, and such that
supp(f ) = {n ∈ N | f (n) = 0} is finite.
∆±
k is a δ-net on Sc0 , i.e.
Sc0 =
f ∈∆±
k
Sc0 (f , δ).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 30 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Let k be a positive integer and let 0 < δ < 1 be such that
(1 + δ)1−k
= δ.
Let ∆±
k be the family of all maps
f : N → {0, ±(1 + δ)1−k
, ±(1 + δ)2−k
, . . . , ±(1 + δ)−1
, ±1},
which attain at least one of the values ±1, and such that
supp(f ) = {n ∈ N | f (n) = 0} is finite.
∆±
k is a δ-net on Sc0 , i.e.
Sc0 =
f ∈∆±
k
Sc0 (f , δ).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 30 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Let k be a positive integer and let 0 < δ < 1 be such that
(1 + δ)1−k
= δ.
Let ∆±
k be the family of all maps
f : N → {0, ±(1 + δ)1−k
, ±(1 + δ)2−k
, . . . , ±(1 + δ)−1
, ±1},
which attain at least one of the values ±1, and such that
supp(f ) = {n ∈ N | f (n) = 0} is finite.
∆±
k is a δ-net on Sc0 , i.e.
Sc0 =
f ∈∆±
k
Sc0 (f , δ).
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 30 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Consider the function φ : R → R,
φ(x) =
log |x|
log((1 + δ)−1)
.
Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h.
We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN±
k by
Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }.
Thus, if f ∈ ∆±
k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that
Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Consider the function φ : R → R,
φ(x) =
log |x|
log((1 + δ)−1)
.
Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h.
We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN±
k by
Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }.
Thus, if f ∈ ∆±
k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that
Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Consider the function φ : R → R,
φ(x) =
log |x|
log((1 + δ)−1)
.
Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h.
We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN±
k by
Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }.
Thus, if f ∈ ∆±
k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that
Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Consider the function φ : R → R,
φ(x) =
log |x|
log((1 + δ)−1)
.
Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h.
We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN±
k by
Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }.
Thus, if f ∈ ∆±
k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that
Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Hence Φ|∆±
k
is a bijection onto FIN±
k .
Lemma
For every f ∈ ∆±
k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1.
Φ(λ · f ) = Tj
(Φ(f ))
for j = min{k, φ(λ) }.
Corollary
For any finite partition of ∆±
k , there is an infinite dimensional block
subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that
SX ⊆ (P)δ.
Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Hence Φ|∆±
k
is a bijection onto FIN±
k .
Lemma
For every f ∈ ∆±
k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1.
Φ(λ · f ) = Tj
(Φ(f ))
for j = min{k, φ(λ) }.
Corollary
For any finite partition of ∆±
k , there is an infinite dimensional block
subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that
SX ⊆ (P)δ.
Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Hence Φ|∆±
k
is a bijection onto FIN±
k .
Lemma
For every f ∈ ∆±
k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1.
Φ(λ · f ) = Tj
(Φ(f ))
for j = min{k, φ(λ) }.
Corollary
For any finite partition of ∆±
k , there is an infinite dimensional block
subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that
SX ⊆ (P)δ.
Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
A δ-net on c0
Hence Φ|∆±
k
is a bijection onto FIN±
k .
Lemma
For every f ∈ ∆±
k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1.
Φ(λ · f ) = Tj
(Φ(f ))
for j = min{k, φ(λ) }.
Corollary
For any finite partition of ∆±
k , there is an infinite dimensional block
subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that
SX ⊆ (P)δ.
Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
The oscillation-stability problem
Theorem
Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere
of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit
sphere of which F varies by at most .
A sketch of the proof:
• Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F.
• Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2.
• Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of
diameter ≤ /2.
• We conclude by applying the previous corollary.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
The oscillation-stability problem
Theorem
Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere
of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit
sphere of which F varies by at most .
A sketch of the proof:
• Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F.
• Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2.
• Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of
diameter ≤ /2.
• We conclude by applying the previous corollary.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
The oscillation-stability problem
Theorem
Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere
of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit
sphere of which F varies by at most .
A sketch of the proof:
• Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F.
• Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2.
• Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of
diameter ≤ /2.
• We conclude by applying the previous corollary.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
The oscillation-stability problem
Theorem
Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere
of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit
sphere of which F varies by at most .
A sketch of the proof:
• Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F.
• Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2.
• Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of
diameter ≤ /2.
• We conclude by applying the previous corollary.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
The importance of Gowers’ Theorem
Theorem (Hindman, on finite sums)
For every finite colouring of N, there is an infinite sequence {bn} ⊆ N such
that the family of all finite sums of elements of {bn} is monochromatic.
Theorem (Hindman, on finite unions)
Let Pf be the family of all finite nonempty subsets of N. For every finite
colouring of Pf , there exists an infinite sequence {bn} of disjoint subsets
of N such that the family of all finite unions of finite nonempty subfamilies
of {bn} is monochromatic.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 34 / 37
The importance of Gowers’ Theorem
Theorem (Hindman, on finite sums)
For every finite colouring of N, there is an infinite sequence {bn} ⊆ N such
that the family of all finite sums of elements of {bn} is monochromatic.
Theorem (Hindman, on finite unions)
Let Pf be the family of all finite nonempty subsets of N. For every finite
colouring of Pf , there exists an infinite sequence {bn} of disjoint subsets
of N such that the family of all finite unions of finite nonempty subfamilies
of {bn} is monochromatic.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 34 / 37
The importance of Gowers’ Theorem
If we consider FINk instead of FIN±
k , one has a Ramsey result:
Theorem (Gowers)
For every finite colouring of FINk, there is an infinite block sequence B of
elements of FINk such that the partial semigroup generated by B is
monochromatic.
If we take k = 1, one has
Theorem
For every finite colouring of FIN1, there is an infinite block sequence B of
elements of FIN1 such that the partial semigroup generated by B is
monochromatic.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 35 / 37
The importance of Gowers’ Theorem
If we consider FINk instead of FIN±
k , one has a Ramsey result:
Theorem (Gowers)
For every finite colouring of FINk, there is an infinite block sequence B of
elements of FINk such that the partial semigroup generated by B is
monochromatic.
If we take k = 1, one has
Theorem
For every finite colouring of FIN1, there is an infinite block sequence B of
elements of FIN1 such that the partial semigroup generated by B is
monochromatic.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 35 / 37
The importance of Gowers’ Theorem
Theorem
For every finite colouring of FIN1, there is an infinite block sequence B of
elements of FIN1 such that the partial semigroup generated by B is
monochromatic.
Theorem (Hindman, on finite unions)
Let Pf be the family of all finite nonempty subsets of N. For every finite
colouring of Pf , there exists an infinite sequence {bn} of disjoint subsets
of N such that the family of all finite unions of finite nonempty subfamilies
of {bn} is monochromatic.
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 36 / 37
- Thanks for your attention -
Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 37 / 37

More Related Content

What's hot

Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)
Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)
Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)Teun Dings
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologybkrawat08
 
Seminar on Motivic Hall Algebras
Seminar on Motivic Hall AlgebrasSeminar on Motivic Hall Algebras
Seminar on Motivic Hall AlgebrasHeinrich Hartmann
 
About extensions of mappings into topologically complete spaces
About extensions of mappings into topologically complete spacesAbout extensions of mappings into topologically complete spaces
About extensions of mappings into topologically complete spacesRadu Dumbrăveanu
 
g∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spacesg∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spacesIJMER
 
Existence and Uniqueness of Algebraic Closure
Existence and Uniqueness of Algebraic ClosureExistence and Uniqueness of Algebraic Closure
Existence and Uniqueness of Algebraic ClosureAyan Sengupta
 
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesSome forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesIOSR Journals
 
Cs229 notes8
Cs229 notes8Cs229 notes8
Cs229 notes8VuTran231
 
On Gr-Separation Axioms
 On Gr-Separation Axioms  On Gr-Separation Axioms
On Gr-Separation Axioms IJMER
 
A Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functions
A Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functionsA Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functions
A Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functionsesasancpe
 
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected SpacesIJMER
 
Negative correlation properties for graphs
Negative correlation properties for graphsNegative correlation properties for graphs
Negative correlation properties for graphsAlejandro Erickson
 
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff SpacesHausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spacesgizemk
 
Lectures on Analytic Geometry
Lectures on Analytic GeometryLectures on Analytic Geometry
Lectures on Analytic GeometryAnatol Alizar
 
Unification and Lifting
Unification and LiftingUnification and Lifting
Unification and LiftingMegha Sharma
 
New type of generalized closed sets
  New type of generalized closed sets  New type of generalized closed sets
New type of generalized closed setsAlexander Decker
 

What's hot (19)

Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)
Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)
Masterscriptie T. Dings (4029100)
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topology
 
Seminar on Motivic Hall Algebras
Seminar on Motivic Hall AlgebrasSeminar on Motivic Hall Algebras
Seminar on Motivic Hall Algebras
 
About extensions of mappings into topologically complete spaces
About extensions of mappings into topologically complete spacesAbout extensions of mappings into topologically complete spaces
About extensions of mappings into topologically complete spaces
 
g∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spacesg∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
 
Existence and Uniqueness of Algebraic Closure
Existence and Uniqueness of Algebraic ClosureExistence and Uniqueness of Algebraic Closure
Existence and Uniqueness of Algebraic Closure
 
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
 
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesSome forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
 
Cs229 notes8
Cs229 notes8Cs229 notes8
Cs229 notes8
 
Topology
TopologyTopology
Topology
 
On Gr-Separation Axioms
 On Gr-Separation Axioms  On Gr-Separation Axioms
On Gr-Separation Axioms
 
A Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functions
A Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functionsA Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functions
A Komlo ́sTheorem for general Banach lattices of measurable functions
 
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
 
Negative correlation properties for graphs
Negative correlation properties for graphsNegative correlation properties for graphs
Negative correlation properties for graphs
 
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff SpacesHausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
 
Lectures on Analytic Geometry
Lectures on Analytic GeometryLectures on Analytic Geometry
Lectures on Analytic Geometry
 
Unification and Lifting
Unification and LiftingUnification and Lifting
Unification and Lifting
 
C027011018
C027011018C027011018
C027011018
 
New type of generalized closed sets
  New type of generalized closed sets  New type of generalized closed sets
New type of generalized closed sets
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

public finance areas
public finance areaspublic finance areas
public finance areas
 
Placa madre
Placa madrePlaca madre
Placa madre
 
Advance php training course
Advance php training courseAdvance php training course
Advance php training course
 
Shell+lubricants+conversion+guide
Shell+lubricants+conversion+guideShell+lubricants+conversion+guide
Shell+lubricants+conversion+guide
 
Vicios en colombia ppt
Vicios en colombia pptVicios en colombia ppt
Vicios en colombia ppt
 
Karnaugh Map (K-map)
Karnaugh Map (K-map)Karnaugh Map (K-map)
Karnaugh Map (K-map)
 
CV_Vipul Sharma
CV_Vipul SharmaCV_Vipul Sharma
CV_Vipul Sharma
 
Certificate mag. ing. mech.
Certificate mag. ing. mech.Certificate mag. ing. mech.
Certificate mag. ing. mech.
 
cat-corporate-brochure
cat-corporate-brochurecat-corporate-brochure
cat-corporate-brochure
 
Don't Let Your Goat Come Back
Don't Let Your Goat Come BackDon't Let Your Goat Come Back
Don't Let Your Goat Come Back
 
Arquitectura barroca.
Arquitectura barroca.Arquitectura barroca.
Arquitectura barroca.
 
Associated Crafts® & Willet Hauser™ - History, Products and Services
Associated Crafts® & Willet Hauser™ - History, Products and ServicesAssociated Crafts® & Willet Hauser™ - History, Products and Services
Associated Crafts® & Willet Hauser™ - History, Products and Services
 
ゆるふわScalaコップ本読書会 第7章
ゆるふわScalaコップ本読書会 第7章ゆるふわScalaコップ本読書会 第7章
ゆるふわScalaコップ本読書会 第7章
 
Incidence of tax
Incidence of taxIncidence of tax
Incidence of tax
 
Shifting and incidence of taxes
Shifting and incidence of taxes Shifting and incidence of taxes
Shifting and incidence of taxes
 
Public Finance Management
Public Finance ManagementPublic Finance Management
Public Finance Management
 
Transports and externalities
Transports and externalitiesTransports and externalities
Transports and externalities
 
Public finance
Public financePublic finance
Public finance
 
Public finance
Public financePublic finance
Public finance
 
Public finance chapter 7
Public finance chapter 7Public finance chapter 7
Public finance chapter 7
 

Similar to Presentazione Tesi Magistrale

applied mathematics methods.pdf
applied mathematics methods.pdfapplied mathematics methods.pdf
applied mathematics methods.pdfCyprianObota
 
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitos
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitosFunctionalanalysis ejemplos infinitos
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitosSualín Rojas
 
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical SingularitiesReciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical SingularitiesLukasz Obara
 
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation Space
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation SpaceFundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation Space
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation SpaceYogeshIJTSRD
 
16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer Perceptron
16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer Perceptron16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer Perceptron
16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer PerceptronAndres Mendez-Vazquez
 
Continutiy of Functions.ppt
Continutiy of Functions.pptContinutiy of Functions.ppt
Continutiy of Functions.pptLadallaRajKumar
 
bau-22-1.pdf
bau-22-1.pdfbau-22-1.pdf
bau-22-1.pdfShengBau
 
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatovCsr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatovCSR2011
 
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatovCsr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatovCSR2011
 
A historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functions
A historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functionsA historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functions
A historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functionsAlejandro Domínguez Torres
 
Tychonoff's theorem.pdf
Tychonoff's theorem.pdfTychonoff's theorem.pdf
Tychonoff's theorem.pdfgexola9244
 
Dialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov ProblemsDialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov ProblemsValeria de Paiva
 
Dialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov ProblemsDialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov ProblemsValeria de Paiva
 
Understanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through moments
Understanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through momentsUnderstanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through moments
Understanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through momentsTim Reis
 
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdf
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdfamer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdf
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdfxohovaf
 
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach SpaceOn Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach SpaceBRNSS Publication Hub
 
The Intersection Axiom of Conditional Probability
The Intersection Axiom of Conditional ProbabilityThe Intersection Axiom of Conditional Probability
The Intersection Axiom of Conditional ProbabilityRichard Gill
 

Similar to Presentazione Tesi Magistrale (20)

applied mathematics methods.pdf
applied mathematics methods.pdfapplied mathematics methods.pdf
applied mathematics methods.pdf
 
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
 
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
 
project
projectproject
project
 
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitos
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitosFunctionalanalysis ejemplos infinitos
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitos
 
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical SingularitiesReciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
 
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation Space
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation SpaceFundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation Space
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation Space
 
16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer Perceptron
16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer Perceptron16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer Perceptron
16 Machine Learning Universal Approximation Multilayer Perceptron
 
Continutiy of Functions.ppt
Continutiy of Functions.pptContinutiy of Functions.ppt
Continutiy of Functions.ppt
 
bau-22-1.pdf
bau-22-1.pdfbau-22-1.pdf
bau-22-1.pdf
 
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatovCsr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
 
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatovCsr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
Csr2011 june17 14_00_bulatov
 
A historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functions
A historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functionsA historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functions
A historical note on schwartz space and test or bump functions
 
Tychonoff's theorem.pdf
Tychonoff's theorem.pdfTychonoff's theorem.pdf
Tychonoff's theorem.pdf
 
Dialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov ProblemsDialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
 
Dialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov ProblemsDialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
Dialectica and Kolmogorov Problems
 
Understanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through moments
Understanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through momentsUnderstanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through moments
Understanding lattice Boltzmann boundary conditions through moments
 
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdf
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdfamer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdf
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdf
 
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach SpaceOn Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
 
The Intersection Axiom of Conditional Probability
The Intersection Axiom of Conditional ProbabilityThe Intersection Axiom of Conditional Probability
The Intersection Axiom of Conditional Probability
 

Presentazione Tesi Magistrale

  • 1. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem Pietro Porqueddu University of Pisa 03/02/2017 Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 1 / 37
  • 2. Introduction In 1992, Timothy Gowers provided a positive answer to the oscillation stability problem in c0. The very core of the proof is a combinatorial argument which represents a very important result in Ramsey Theory known as Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem. One of the typical problems is Ramsey Theory is to determine whether some structure is preserved when it is partitioned (coloured). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 2 / 37
  • 3. The distortion problem Let (E, · ) be a Banach space and λ > 1 a real number. We say that E is λ-distortable if there exists an equivalent norm | · | on E such that for every infinite-dimensional vector subspace X of E, sup |x| |y| | x, y ∈ X and ||x|| = ||y|| = 1 ≥ λ. We say that E is distortable if it is λ-distortable for some λ > 1, and it is arbitrarily distortable if it is λ-distortable for every λ > 1. The question of whether a Banach space is distortable or not is called the distortion problem. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 3 / 37
  • 4. The distortion problem Let (E, · ) be a Banach space and λ > 1 a real number. We say that E is λ-distortable if there exists an equivalent norm | · | on E such that for every infinite-dimensional vector subspace X of E, sup |x| |y| | x, y ∈ X and ||x|| = ||y|| = 1 ≥ λ. We say that E is distortable if it is λ-distortable for some λ > 1, and it is arbitrarily distortable if it is λ-distortable for every λ > 1. The question of whether a Banach space is distortable or not is called the distortion problem. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 3 / 37
  • 5. The distortion problem R.C. James (1964) proved that c0 and 1 are not distortable. V. Milman (1971) proved that a non-distortable space must contain an isomorphic copy of c0 or p, 1 ≤ p < ∞. The problem in the case of separable Hilbert spaces and for p, for any 1 < p < ∞, was solved affirmatively by E. Odell and T. Schlumprecht (1994). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 4 / 37
  • 6. The distortion problem R.C. James (1964) proved that c0 and 1 are not distortable. V. Milman (1971) proved that a non-distortable space must contain an isomorphic copy of c0 or p, 1 ≤ p < ∞. The problem in the case of separable Hilbert spaces and for p, for any 1 < p < ∞, was solved affirmatively by E. Odell and T. Schlumprecht (1994). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 4 / 37
  • 7. The distortion problem R.C. James (1964) proved that c0 and 1 are not distortable. V. Milman (1971) proved that a non-distortable space must contain an isomorphic copy of c0 or p, 1 ≤ p < ∞. The problem in the case of separable Hilbert spaces and for p, for any 1 < p < ∞, was solved affirmatively by E. Odell and T. Schlumprecht (1994). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 4 / 37
  • 8. The oscillation stability problem In a Banach space (E, · ), the oscillation stability problem is the question of whether or not, given > 0, for every real-valued Lipschitz function f on the unit sphere SE there exists an infinite-dimensional subspace X of E on the unit sphere of which f varies by at almost , i.e., whether there is a real number a ∈ R and an infinite-dimensional subspace X of E such that ||a − f (x)|| < for all x ∈ X with ||x|| = 1. In a separable and uniform convex Banach space (such as the p spaces for 1 < p < ∞), the distortion problem and the oscillation stability problem are equivalent. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 5 / 37
  • 9. The oscillation stability problem In a Banach space (E, · ), the oscillation stability problem is the question of whether or not, given > 0, for every real-valued Lipschitz function f on the unit sphere SE there exists an infinite-dimensional subspace X of E on the unit sphere of which f varies by at almost , i.e., whether there is a real number a ∈ R and an infinite-dimensional subspace X of E such that ||a − f (x)|| < for all x ∈ X with ||x|| = 1. In a separable and uniform convex Banach space (such as the p spaces for 1 < p < ∞), the distortion problem and the oscillation stability problem are equivalent. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 5 / 37
  • 10. Gowers’ Theorem Theorem Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit sphere of which F varies by at most . The strategy of the proof is to find explicit generators of such a subspace taken among the maps which belong to a δ-net on Sc0 . Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 6 / 37
  • 11. Gowers’ Theorem Theorem Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit sphere of which F varies by at most . The strategy of the proof is to find explicit generators of such a subspace taken among the maps which belong to a δ-net on Sc0 . Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 6 / 37
  • 12. What we will see • In the first part, we will introduce the notions of ultrafilter and semigroup, and some of their properties. • In the second part, we will prove Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem. • Finally, we will see Gowers’ solution of the oscillation stability problem in c0 as a consequence of Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 7 / 37
  • 13. Semigroups Definition A semigroup is a nonempty set S with a map · : S2 −→ S defined for all x, y ∈ S, that satisfies the associative law (x · y) · z = x · (y · z) Usually we will drop the · and we will write xy instead of x · y. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 8 / 37
  • 14. Ideals and subsemigroups Definition A compact left-semigroup is a nonempty semigroup S with a compact Hausdorff topology such that, for all x ∈ S, the map λx : y −→ xy is continuous for all y. A subset T ⊆ S is a (compact) subsemigroup of S if it is a compact left-semigroup as subspace of S. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 9 / 37
  • 15. Idempotents and Ellis’ Theorem Definition An element x ∈ S is idempotent if and only if x2 = x. Theorem (Ellis’ Theorem) Every compact left-semigroup S has an idempotent. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 10 / 37
  • 16. Idempotents and Ellis’ Theorem Definition An element x ∈ S is idempotent if and only if x2 = x. Theorem (Ellis’ Theorem) Every compact left-semigroup S has an idempotent. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 10 / 37
  • 17. Filters and ultrafilters Definition Let S be a set. A family F of subsets of S is a filter on S if 1 ∅ /∈ F and S ∈ F; 2 If A, B ∈ F, then A ∩ B ∈ F; 3 If A ∈ F and A ⊆ B, then B ∈ F. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 11 / 37
  • 18. Filters and ultrafilters Proposition Let S be a set and F a filter on S. The following are equivalent 1 If A /∈ F, then Ac ∈ F; 2 If A1 ∪ . . . ∪ An ∈ F, then there exists i such that Ai ∈ F; 3 F is maximal respect to the inclusion, i.e. if G is a filter on S and F ⊆ G, then F = G. Definition A filter F on a set S which satisfies one, and then all, of the properties of the above proposition is called ultrafilter. We will denote by βS the set of all ultrafilters on S. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 12 / 37
  • 19. Filters and ultrafilters Proposition Let S be a set and F a filter on S. The following are equivalent 1 If A /∈ F, then Ac ∈ F; 2 If A1 ∪ . . . ∪ An ∈ F, then there exists i such that Ai ∈ F; 3 F is maximal respect to the inclusion, i.e. if G is a filter on S and F ⊆ G, then F = G. Definition A filter F on a set S which satisfies one, and then all, of the properties of the above proposition is called ultrafilter. We will denote by βS the set of all ultrafilters on S. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 12 / 37
  • 20. Filters and ultrafilters Proposition Let S be a set and F a filter on S. The following are equivalent 1 If A /∈ F, then Ac ∈ F; 2 If A1 ∪ . . . ∪ An ∈ F, then there exists i such that Ai ∈ F; 3 F is maximal respect to the inclusion, i.e. if G is a filter on S and F ⊆ G, then F = G. Definition A filter F on a set S which satisfies one, and then all, of the properties of the above proposition is called ultrafilter. We will denote by βS the set of all ultrafilters on S. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 12 / 37
  • 21. The space βS Definition On βS we define the topology generated by the (cl)open set basis B = {OA | A ⊆ S} where OA = {U ultrafilter on S | A ∈ U} Theorem The space βS is the Stone-ˇCech compactification of the discrete space S: 1 βS is a compact Hausdorff space; 2 S is a dense discrete subset of βS; 3 for any compact Hausdorff space K and any f : S → K, there exists an unique continuous extension ¯f : βS → K. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 13 / 37
  • 22. The space βS Definition On βS we define the topology generated by the (cl)open set basis B = {OA | A ⊆ S} where OA = {U ultrafilter on S | A ∈ U} Theorem The space βS is the Stone-ˇCech compactification of the discrete space S: 1 βS is a compact Hausdorff space; 2 S is a dense discrete subset of βS; 3 for any compact Hausdorff space K and any f : S → K, there exists an unique continuous extension ¯f : βS → K. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 13 / 37
  • 23. The space βS Theorem Let (S, ·) be a compact semigroup. There exists a unique associative binary operation ∗ : βS × βS → βS satisfying the following conditions 1 For every x, y ∈ S, x ∗ y = x · y; 2 For each V ∈ βS, the function pV : βS × βS → βS is continuous, where pV(U) = U ∗ V; 3 For each x ∈ S, the function qx : βS × βS → βS is continuous, where qx (V) = x ∗ V. Proposition Let U, V be ultrafilters in βS. Then A ∈ U ∗ V ⇔ {x ∈ S | {y ∈ S | x · y ∈ A} ∈ V} ∈ U. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 14 / 37
  • 24. The space βS Theorem Let (S, ·) be a compact semigroup. There exists a unique associative binary operation ∗ : βS × βS → βS satisfying the following conditions 1 For every x, y ∈ S, x ∗ y = x · y; 2 For each V ∈ βS, the function pV : βS × βS → βS is continuous, where pV(U) = U ∗ V; 3 For each x ∈ S, the function qx : βS × βS → βS is continuous, where qx (V) = x ∗ V. Proposition Let U, V be ultrafilters in βS. Then A ∈ U ∗ V ⇔ {x ∈ S | {y ∈ S | x · y ∈ A} ∈ V} ∈ U. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 14 / 37
  • 25. Algebra in βS Proposition The ultrafilter product U ∗ V has the following properties 1 (U ∗ V) ∗ W = U ∗ (V ∗ W); 2 V → U ∗ V is a continuous map from βS into βS for every U. Corollary The space (βS, ∗) is a compact left-semigroup. Corollary There exist idempotent ultrafilters in (βS, ∗). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 15 / 37
  • 26. Algebra in βS Proposition The ultrafilter product U ∗ V has the following properties 1 (U ∗ V) ∗ W = U ∗ (V ∗ W); 2 V → U ∗ V is a continuous map from βS into βS for every U. Corollary The space (βS, ∗) is a compact left-semigroup. Corollary There exist idempotent ultrafilters in (βS, ∗). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 15 / 37
  • 27. Algebra in βS Proposition The ultrafilter product U ∗ V has the following properties 1 (U ∗ V) ∗ W = U ∗ (V ∗ W); 2 V → U ∗ V is a continuous map from βS into βS for every U. Corollary The space (βS, ∗) is a compact left-semigroup. Corollary There exist idempotent ultrafilters in (βS, ∗). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 15 / 37
  • 28. The set FIN± k Let k be a positive integer. We consider the set FIN± k of the maps p : N → {0, ±1, . . . , ±k} such that supp(p) = {n ∈ N | p(n) = 0} is finite, and p attains at least one of the values k or −k. We define on FIN± k a coordinate-wise sum (p + q)(n) = p(n) + q(n) whenever supp(p) ∩ supp(q) = ∅. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 16 / 37
  • 29. The set FIN± k Let k be a positive integer. We consider the set FIN± k of the maps p : N → {0, ±1, . . . , ±k} such that supp(p) = {n ∈ N | p(n) = 0} is finite, and p attains at least one of the values k or −k. We define on FIN± k a coordinate-wise sum (p + q)(n) = p(n) + q(n) whenever supp(p) ∩ supp(q) = ∅. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 16 / 37
  • 30. The set FIN± k Let k be a positive integer. We consider the set FIN± k of the maps p : N → {0, ±1, . . . , ±k} such that supp(p) = {n ∈ N | p(n) = 0} is finite, and p attains at least one of the values k or −k. We define on FIN± k a coordinate-wise sum (p + q)(n) = p(n) + q(n) whenever supp(p) ∩ supp(q) = ∅. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 16 / 37
  • 31. Ultrafilters on FIN± k The set FIN± k is an example of partial semigroup. The construction of a semigroup of ultrafilters (βS, ∗) works also for a large class of partial semigroups S. In this case, we need to restrict to cofinite ultrafilters. Definition We say that an ultrafilter U on FIN± k is cofinite if ∀p ∈ FIN± k , {q ∈ FIN± k | p + q is defined} ∈ U. We denote by γFIN± k the set of all cofinite ultrafilters. Proposition The set (γFIN± k , +) is a compact left-semigroup. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 17 / 37
  • 32. Ultrafilters on FIN± k The set FIN± k is an example of partial semigroup. The construction of a semigroup of ultrafilters (βS, ∗) works also for a large class of partial semigroups S. In this case, we need to restrict to cofinite ultrafilters. Definition We say that an ultrafilter U on FIN± k is cofinite if ∀p ∈ FIN± k , {q ∈ FIN± k | p + q is defined} ∈ U. We denote by γFIN± k the set of all cofinite ultrafilters. Proposition The set (γFIN± k , +) is a compact left-semigroup. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 17 / 37
  • 33. Ultrafilters on FIN± k We extend the sum to the partial semigroup FIN± [1,k] = k i=1 FIN± i , If p ∈ FIN± k and q ∈ FIN± h , then p + q ∈ FIN± max{k,h}. The correspondent space of ultrafilters is γ(FIN± [1,k]) = k i=1 γFIN± i Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 18 / 37
  • 34. Ultrafilters on FIN± k We extend the sum to the partial semigroup FIN± [1,k] = k i=1 FIN± i , If p ∈ FIN± k and q ∈ FIN± h , then p + q ∈ FIN± max{k,h}. The correspondent space of ultrafilters is γ(FIN± [1,k]) = k i=1 γFIN± i Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 18 / 37
  • 35. The tetris operation Definition We call tetris operation the map T : FIN± k → FIN± k−1 defined as T(p)(n) =    p(n) − 1 if p(n) > 0, 0 if p(n) = 0, p(n) + 1 if p(n) < 0. Notice that T(p + q) = T(p) + T(q) whenever p, q have disjoint supports. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 19 / 37
  • 36. The tetris operation Definition We call tetris operation the map T : FIN± k → FIN± k−1 defined as T(p)(n) =    p(n) − 1 if p(n) > 0, 0 if p(n) = 0, p(n) + 1 if p(n) < 0. Notice that T(p + q) = T(p) + T(q) whenever p, q have disjoint supports. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 19 / 37
  • 37. Block sequences Definition A basic block sequence B = {bn}n of elements of FIN± k is any sequence such that supp(bi ) < supp(bj ) whenever i < j. Definition The partial subsemigroup of FIN± k generated by a basic block sequence B = {bn}n is the family of functions of the form 0Tj0 (bn0 ) + 1Tj1 (bn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl (bnl ), where i = ±1, n0 < . . . < nl , j0, . . . , jl ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and at least one of the j0, . . . , jl is equal to zero. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 20 / 37
  • 38. Block sequences Definition A basic block sequence B = {bn}n of elements of FIN± k is any sequence such that supp(bi ) < supp(bj ) whenever i < j. Definition The partial subsemigroup of FIN± k generated by a basic block sequence B = {bn}n is the family of functions of the form 0Tj0 (bn0 ) + 1Tj1 (bn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl (bnl ), where i = ±1, n0 < . . . < nl , j0, . . . , jl ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and at least one of the j0, . . . , jl is equal to zero. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 20 / 37
  • 39. Extending the tetris operation We extend the tetris operation on the space of cofinite ultrafilters as follows: T : γFIN± k → γFIN± k−1 is the function where T(U) = {A ⊆ FIN± k−1 | {p ∈ FIN± k |T(p) ∈ A} ∈ U}. for all U ∈ γFIN± k . Proposition T : γFIN± k → γFIN± k−1 is a continuous onto homomorphism. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 21 / 37
  • 40. Extending the tetris operation We extend the tetris operation on the space of cofinite ultrafilters as follows: T : γFIN± k → γFIN± k−1 is the function where T(U) = {A ⊆ FIN± k−1 | {p ∈ FIN± k |T(p) ∈ A} ∈ U}. for all U ∈ γFIN± k . Proposition T : γFIN± k → γFIN± k−1 is a continuous onto homomorphism. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 21 / 37
  • 41. Subsymmetric ultrafilters For every A ⊆ FIN± k and > 0, we define (A) = {q ∈ FIN± k | ∃p ∈ A p − q ∞≤ } Definition We say that a cofinite ultrafilter U ∈ γFIN± k is subsymmetric if −(A)1 ∈ U for all A ∈ U. We denote by S± k the set of all subsymmetric ultrafilters on FIN± k . Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 22 / 37
  • 42. Subsymmetric ultrafilters For every A ⊆ FIN± k and > 0, we define (A) = {q ∈ FIN± k | ∃p ∈ A p − q ∞≤ } Definition We say that a cofinite ultrafilter U ∈ γFIN± k is subsymmetric if −(A)1 ∈ U for all A ∈ U. We denote by S± k the set of all subsymmetric ultrafilters on FIN± k . Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 22 / 37
  • 43. Subsymmetric ultrafilters Lemma The set S± k is a closed subsemigroup of γFIN± k . Lemma T(U) ∈ S± k−1 for all U ∈ S± k . Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 23 / 37
  • 44. Subsymmetric ultrafilters Lemma The set S± k is a closed subsemigroup of γFIN± k . Lemma T(U) ∈ S± k−1 for all U ∈ S± k . Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 23 / 37
  • 45. Do subsymmetric ultrafilters exist? Answer: It is claimed by Todorcevic, but he does not prove it in detail. Lemma The set S± k = ∅ for all k ≥ 1. Todorcevic’s hint. Let V be a cofinite ultrafilter on FIN± k . Then U = Tk−1 (V) − Tk−1 (V) + Tk−2 (V) − Tk−2 (V) + . . . + + T(V) − T(V) + V − V + T(V) − T(V) + . . . + + Tk−2 (V) − Tk−2 (V) + Tk−1 (V) − Tk−1 (V) is a subsymmetric ultrafilter. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 24 / 37
  • 46. Do subsymmetric ultrafilters exist? Answer: It is claimed by Todorcevic, but he does not prove it in detail. Lemma The set S± k = ∅ for all k ≥ 1. Todorcevic’s hint. Let V be a cofinite ultrafilter on FIN± k . Then U = Tk−1 (V) − Tk−1 (V) + Tk−2 (V) − Tk−2 (V) + . . . + + T(V) − T(V) + V − V + T(V) − T(V) + . . . + + Tk−2 (V) − Tk−2 (V) + Tk−1 (V) − Tk−1 (V) is a subsymmetric ultrafilter. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 24 / 37
  • 47. Do subsymmetric ultrafilters exist? Answer: It is claimed by Todorcevic, but he does not prove it in detail. Lemma The set S± k = ∅ for all k ≥ 1. Todorcevic’s hint. Let V be a cofinite ultrafilter on FIN± k . Then U = Tk−1 (V) − Tk−1 (V) + Tk−2 (V) − Tk−2 (V) + . . . + + T(V) − T(V) + V − V + T(V) − T(V) + . . . + + Tk−2 (V) − Tk−2 (V) + Tk−1 (V) − Tk−1 (V) is a subsymmetric ultrafilter. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 24 / 37
  • 48. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem Theorem (Gowers) For every finite partition of FIN± k there is a piece P of the partition such that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN± k generated by an infinite basic block sequence. We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P. Consider the colourings: 1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then f and −f have always different colours. 2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign, BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
  • 49. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem Theorem (Gowers) For every finite partition of FIN± k there is a piece P of the partition such that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN± k generated by an infinite basic block sequence. We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P. Consider the colourings: 1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then f and −f have always different colours. 2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign, BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
  • 50. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem Theorem (Gowers) For every finite partition of FIN± k there is a piece P of the partition such that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN± k generated by an infinite basic block sequence. We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P. Consider the colourings: 1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then f and −f have always different colours. 2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign, BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
  • 51. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem Theorem (Gowers) For every finite partition of FIN± k there is a piece P of the partition such that (P)1 contains a partial subsemigroup of FIN± k generated by an infinite basic block sequence. We cannot ask the partial semigroup to be contained entirely in P. Consider the colourings: 1 RED if the first nonzero coordinate is positive, BLUE otherwise. Then f and −f have always different colours. 2 RED if the first and last nonzero coordinates have the same sign, BLUE otherwise. Then f + g and f − g have always different colours. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 25 / 37
  • 52. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem To prove Gowers’ Theorem we need the following lemma: Lemma There exists a sequence of ultrafilters Uj ∈ S± j (1 ≤ j ≤ k) such that for all 1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ k: (i) Ui + Ui = Ui ; (ii) Ui + Uj = Uj + Ui = Uj ; (iii) Tj−i (Uj ) = Ui . Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 26 / 37
  • 53. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem A sketch of the proof: • Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma. • Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk. • Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk. • We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of sets {Al n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n); 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul ; 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n; 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul for 1 ≤ j, l ≤ k. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
  • 54. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem A sketch of the proof: • Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma. • Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk. • Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk. • We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of sets {Al n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n); 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul ; 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n; 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul for 1 ≤ j, l ≤ k. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
  • 55. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem A sketch of the proof: • Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma. • Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk. • Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk. • We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of sets {Al n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n); 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul ; 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n; 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul for 1 ≤ j, l ≤ k. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
  • 56. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem A sketch of the proof: • Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma. • Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk. • Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk. • We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of sets {Al n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n); 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul ; 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n; 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul for 1 ≤ j, l ≤ k. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
  • 57. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem A sketch of the proof: • Consider the sequence of ultrafilter Uj (1 ≤ j ≤ k) given by the lemma. • Let P be the piece of the partition such that P ∈ Uk. • Since Uk is subsymmetric, (P)1 ∩ −(P)1 ∈ Uk. • We can construct a block sequence {xn}n and a decreasing sequence of sets {Al n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) such that 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n); 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul ; 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n; 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul for 1 ≤ j, l ≤ k. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 27 / 37
  • 58. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem We can represent the sequence {Al n}n (1 ≤ l ≤ k) with this diagram Ak 0 ⊃ Ak 1 ⊃ . . . ⊃ Ak n−2 ⊃ Ak n ∈ Uk ↓T ↓T Ak−1 0 ⊃ Ak−1 1 ⊃ . . . ⊃ Ak−1 n−2 ⊃ Ak−1 n ∈ Uk−1 ↓T ↓T ... ... ↓T ↓T A1 0 ⊃ A1 1 ⊃ . . . ⊃ A1 n−2 ⊃ A1 n ∈ U1 Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 28 / 37
  • 59. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 0Tj0 (xn0 ) + 1Tj1 (xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl (xnl ), 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n). 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul . 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n. ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the generated subspace. 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul . ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
  • 60. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 0Tj0 (xn0 ) + 1Tj1 (xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl (xnl ), 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n). 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul . 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n. ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the generated subspace. 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul . ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
  • 61. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 0Tj0 (xn0 ) + 1Tj1 (xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl (xnl ), 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n). 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul . 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n. ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the generated subspace. 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul . ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
  • 62. Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 0Tj0 (xn0 ) + 1Tj1 (xn1 ) + . . . + l Tjl (xnl ), 1 Ak 0 = (P)1 ∩ −(P)1, Al n = Tk−l (Ak n). 2 Al n = −Al n ∈ Ul . 3 ±xn ∈ Ak n and ±Tk−l (xn) ∈ Al n. ensure that +Ti (xni ), −Ti (xni ), and their sums belong to the generated subspace. 4 Cl,j m = {y ∈ FIN± l | ± Tk−j (xm) ± y ∈ A max{l,j} m } ∈ Ul . ensures we can recursively pick xn so that the sums are well-defined. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 29 / 37
  • 63. A δ-net on c0 Let k be a positive integer and let 0 < δ < 1 be such that (1 + δ)1−k = δ. Let ∆± k be the family of all maps f : N → {0, ±(1 + δ)1−k , ±(1 + δ)2−k , . . . , ±(1 + δ)−1 , ±1}, which attain at least one of the values ±1, and such that supp(f ) = {n ∈ N | f (n) = 0} is finite. ∆± k is a δ-net on Sc0 , i.e. Sc0 = f ∈∆± k Sc0 (f , δ). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 30 / 37
  • 64. A δ-net on c0 Let k be a positive integer and let 0 < δ < 1 be such that (1 + δ)1−k = δ. Let ∆± k be the family of all maps f : N → {0, ±(1 + δ)1−k , ±(1 + δ)2−k , . . . , ±(1 + δ)−1 , ±1}, which attain at least one of the values ±1, and such that supp(f ) = {n ∈ N | f (n) = 0} is finite. ∆± k is a δ-net on Sc0 , i.e. Sc0 = f ∈∆± k Sc0 (f , δ). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 30 / 37
  • 65. A δ-net on c0 Let k be a positive integer and let 0 < δ < 1 be such that (1 + δ)1−k = δ. Let ∆± k be the family of all maps f : N → {0, ±(1 + δ)1−k , ±(1 + δ)2−k , . . . , ±(1 + δ)−1 , ±1}, which attain at least one of the values ±1, and such that supp(f ) = {n ∈ N | f (n) = 0} is finite. ∆± k is a δ-net on Sc0 , i.e. Sc0 = f ∈∆± k Sc0 (f , δ). Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 30 / 37
  • 66. A δ-net on c0 Consider the function φ : R → R, φ(x) = log |x| log((1 + δ)−1) . Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h. We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN± k by Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }. Thus, if f ∈ ∆± k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
  • 67. A δ-net on c0 Consider the function φ : R → R, φ(x) = log |x| log((1 + δ)−1) . Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h. We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN± k by Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }. Thus, if f ∈ ∆± k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
  • 68. A δ-net on c0 Consider the function φ : R → R, φ(x) = log |x| log((1 + δ)−1) . Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h. We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN± k by Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }. Thus, if f ∈ ∆± k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
  • 69. A δ-net on c0 Consider the function φ : R → R, φ(x) = log |x| log((1 + δ)−1) . Notice that φ(±(1 + δ)h−k) = k − h. We define the map Φ : Sc0 → FIN± k by Φ(f )(n) = sign(f (n)) · max{0, k − φ(f (n)) }. Thus, if f ∈ ∆± k and f (n) = ±(1 + δ)h−k we have that Φ(f )(n) = ± max{0, h}. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 31 / 37
  • 70. A δ-net on c0 Hence Φ|∆± k is a bijection onto FIN± k . Lemma For every f ∈ ∆± k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. Φ(λ · f ) = Tj (Φ(f )) for j = min{k, φ(λ) }. Corollary For any finite partition of ∆± k , there is an infinite dimensional block subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that SX ⊆ (P)δ. Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
  • 71. A δ-net on c0 Hence Φ|∆± k is a bijection onto FIN± k . Lemma For every f ∈ ∆± k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. Φ(λ · f ) = Tj (Φ(f )) for j = min{k, φ(λ) }. Corollary For any finite partition of ∆± k , there is an infinite dimensional block subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that SX ⊆ (P)δ. Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
  • 72. A δ-net on c0 Hence Φ|∆± k is a bijection onto FIN± k . Lemma For every f ∈ ∆± k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. Φ(λ · f ) = Tj (Φ(f )) for j = min{k, φ(λ) }. Corollary For any finite partition of ∆± k , there is an infinite dimensional block subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that SX ⊆ (P)δ. Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
  • 73. A δ-net on c0 Hence Φ|∆± k is a bijection onto FIN± k . Lemma For every f ∈ ∆± k and 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. Φ(λ · f ) = Tj (Φ(f )) for j = min{k, φ(λ) }. Corollary For any finite partition of ∆± k , there is an infinite dimensional block subspace X of c0 and there is some piece P of the partition such that SX ⊆ (P)δ. Indeed, since (1 + δ)1−k = δ, we have that Φ((A)δ) = (Φ(A))1. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 32 / 37
  • 74. The oscillation-stability problem Theorem Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit sphere of which F varies by at most . A sketch of the proof: • Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F. • Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2. • Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of diameter ≤ /2. • We conclude by applying the previous corollary. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
  • 75. The oscillation-stability problem Theorem Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit sphere of which F varies by at most . A sketch of the proof: • Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F. • Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2. • Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of diameter ≤ /2. • We conclude by applying the previous corollary. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
  • 76. The oscillation-stability problem Theorem Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit sphere of which F varies by at most . A sketch of the proof: • Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F. • Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2. • Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of diameter ≤ /2. • We conclude by applying the previous corollary. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
  • 77. The oscillation-stability problem Theorem Let > 0 and let F be a real-valued Lipschitz function on the unit sphere of c0. Then there is an infinite-dimensional subspace of c0 on the unit sphere of which F varies by at most . A sketch of the proof: • Let K be the Lipschitz constant of F. • Find k > 0 such that if (1 + δ)1−k = δ then δ · K ≤ /2. • Since the range of F is bounded, we can finitely partition into sets of diameter ≤ /2. • We conclude by applying the previous corollary. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 33 / 37
  • 78. The importance of Gowers’ Theorem Theorem (Hindman, on finite sums) For every finite colouring of N, there is an infinite sequence {bn} ⊆ N such that the family of all finite sums of elements of {bn} is monochromatic. Theorem (Hindman, on finite unions) Let Pf be the family of all finite nonempty subsets of N. For every finite colouring of Pf , there exists an infinite sequence {bn} of disjoint subsets of N such that the family of all finite unions of finite nonempty subfamilies of {bn} is monochromatic. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 34 / 37
  • 79. The importance of Gowers’ Theorem Theorem (Hindman, on finite sums) For every finite colouring of N, there is an infinite sequence {bn} ⊆ N such that the family of all finite sums of elements of {bn} is monochromatic. Theorem (Hindman, on finite unions) Let Pf be the family of all finite nonempty subsets of N. For every finite colouring of Pf , there exists an infinite sequence {bn} of disjoint subsets of N such that the family of all finite unions of finite nonempty subfamilies of {bn} is monochromatic. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 34 / 37
  • 80. The importance of Gowers’ Theorem If we consider FINk instead of FIN± k , one has a Ramsey result: Theorem (Gowers) For every finite colouring of FINk, there is an infinite block sequence B of elements of FINk such that the partial semigroup generated by B is monochromatic. If we take k = 1, one has Theorem For every finite colouring of FIN1, there is an infinite block sequence B of elements of FIN1 such that the partial semigroup generated by B is monochromatic. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 35 / 37
  • 81. The importance of Gowers’ Theorem If we consider FINk instead of FIN± k , one has a Ramsey result: Theorem (Gowers) For every finite colouring of FINk, there is an infinite block sequence B of elements of FINk such that the partial semigroup generated by B is monochromatic. If we take k = 1, one has Theorem For every finite colouring of FIN1, there is an infinite block sequence B of elements of FIN1 such that the partial semigroup generated by B is monochromatic. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 35 / 37
  • 82. The importance of Gowers’ Theorem Theorem For every finite colouring of FIN1, there is an infinite block sequence B of elements of FIN1 such that the partial semigroup generated by B is monochromatic. Theorem (Hindman, on finite unions) Let Pf be the family of all finite nonempty subsets of N. For every finite colouring of Pf , there exists an infinite sequence {bn} of disjoint subsets of N such that the family of all finite unions of finite nonempty subfamilies of {bn} is monochromatic. Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 36 / 37
  • 83. - Thanks for your attention - Pietro Porqueddu (University of Pisa) Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem 03/02/2017 37 / 37