SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 259
Download to read offline
Distributed Optical TDMA photonic
switch fabric based on gain-switched
distributed feedback semiconductor laser
diodes and electroabsorption modulators
by
Paul Gunning
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Department of Electronic Systems Engineering
University of Essex
Monday, January 15th 2001
The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and the
appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the
work of others.
Abstract
Emerging computer environments will require interconnects with low-latency, high
data bandwidths, and fast reconfiguration to interconnect distributed computing,
storage and networking elements. This thesis describes the work that culminated
in the demonstration of a 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA LAN interconnect establishing
2.5Gbit/s interconnections with fast set-up between computer workstations using
single-mode optical fibre.
After some introductory material concerning the operation of optical transmis-
sion systems, wavelength chirped pulses from a gain-switched (GS) distributed feed-
back laser (DFB) semiconductor laser diode (SLD) are temporally compressed to 5ps
with a specially tailored step-chirped in-fibre bragg grating are described. Further
pulsewidth reduction obtained with non-linear fibre compression was investigated.
These pulses are then used within a 100Gbit/s packet self-routing photonic network
demonstrator. Electroabsorption (EA) modulators are introduced both for low-
and high- repetition rate modulation of a continuous wave (CW) optical source.
Other pulse source technologoes are considered including a fibre ring laser and mod-
ulation of a CW optical beam using EA modulators. The inherent timing jitter
intrinsic to the gain-switching process was reduced using coherent CW injection
whilst the resulting enhancement of the interpulse pedestal was removed by an EA
modulator acting as a synchronous temporal gate. EA modulator gating is then
extended to channel selection for optical time-division de-multiplexing when driven
with an electronic impulse generator synchronised to a network clock. An alterna-
tive, all-optical, channel selection scheme which used an integrated Mach-Zehnder
interferometer (IMZI) with the gating window produced directly from the optical
clock pulse will be described. These methods are used within two versions of a
40Gbit/s Optical TDMA network one based on polarisation-maintaining fibre and
containing the IMZI as a channel selection element. Another using the common
blown fibre infrastructure within a building with EA modulator channel selectors.
A star-topology, terabit/s interconnection fabric was outlined which included the
use of wavelength-division multiplexing to increase the aggreated bandwidth.
i
Acknowledgements
Kevin Smith magically set everyting in motion and his continuing guidance, support
kindness and advice was invaluable.
My day-to-day supervisor Julian Lucek was generous, considerate, and patient. Par-
ticularly for sharing his intuitive feel for the practical aspects of fibre optical com-
munication systems. His perception and insight was always timely and apposite.
My academic supervisor, Shamim Siddiqui, I thank for his patience and guidance.
I would like to express my gratitude to David Cotter who approved and supported
the PhD by way of a University of Essex research contract through BT Project
106: Ultrafast Networking. BT (through Project 106,) the University of Essex and
NATO also provided funding to travel to Italy, France, Scotland and New Mexico
to attend and participate in scientific meetings that were invaluable as background
to this thesis.
Dan Pitcher provided invaluable practical support and advice in the laboratory.
Keith Blow, Bob Manning, Alistair Poustie, and Paul Townsend were always helpful
and generous in sharing their knowledge, experience and wisdom.
It was a pleasure to work with, and learn from, Andrew Ellis on many occasions.
In addition Andrew also reviewed the first version of this thesis and provided many
excellent comments and suggestions.
Many other people at BT proved invaluable during the course of this research for
which I am extremely gratefull. These include: Dave Moodie, who provided all the
EA modulators used in this work; Raman Kashyap who provided the fibre bragg
gratings; Derek Nesset for sourcing and guidance with the IMZI; Doug Williams,
who provided much of the research fibre. Colin Ford packaged (and repaired) many
of the devices that were used (and abused.) Dominique Marcenac, John Collins,
Tony Kelly, Russell Davey, Monica Rocha, Jennifer Massicott, David Smith, Daniel
Pataca, Mohammed Shabeer, Paul Urquhart, Richard Wyatt and Terry Widdowson
deserve special mention.
ii
Elke Jahn and Niraj Agrawal from HHI Berlin kindly supplied the Integrated Mach-
Zehnder Interferometer used in this work. Vince Ruddy arranged my initial place-
ment at BT Laboratories.
Judy and Chris Chestnutt in Annesley, Great Bealings provided a quiet and stable
environment in which to write the thesis down the years. Marlies Janssen and
Andrew Ericsson were very kind and supportive.
My friends from Ballyfermot: Steven Kavanagh, Declan Kelly and Martin Smyth.
Some teachers including: Diarmuid O’ Donovan, Noel O’ Brien, and Oliver Murphy.
The Zecca family were very supportive.
Sweety-pie, Fatima, who showed me that when you look into the light, the light also
looks into you. Um abracos e beijos e amor.
Most importantly I was reared by my Aunt Nan and Aunt Kay. They indulged,
cajoled and supported me unconditionally through thick and thin, darkness and
light. This thesis is really a testament to their efforts and sacrifices.
iii
Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Historical background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.1 Information transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.2 Information processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1.3 Local- and wide- area networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 Emerging trends and Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.1 Market drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.2 Inter-chip: removal of the Von Neumann bottleneck . . . . . . 5
1.2.3 SAN: System Area Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.3 Electrical Problems and Optical Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3.1 Physical limits of Electrical interconnects . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3.2 Optical Interconnects emerge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3.3 A practical demonstration: Optical Clock Distribution . . . . 10
1.4 Optical data distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.5 Shared-media Interconnects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.6 Thesis Outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2 Background material 24
2.1 Transmitter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.1.1 Optical pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.1.2 External modulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.1.3 Multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
2.1.3.1 Time-division multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
2.1.3.2 Wavelength-division multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.1.3.3 Optical time-division multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.2 Optical Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.2.1 Single-mode optical fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.2.2 Optical fibre attenuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
iv
2.2.3 Optical fibre dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.2.3.1 Material Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
2.2.3.2 Waveguide Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.2.3.3 Dispersive propagation and wavelength chirp . . . . 40
2.2.3.4 Linearly chirped pulse compression analysis . . . . . 43
2.2.4 Birefringence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.2.5 Non-linear effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.2.5.1 Self-phase and cross-phase modulation . . . . . . . . 46
2.2.5.2 Solitons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2.2.6 Amplification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.2.6.1 Noise and spontaneous emission . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.2.6.2 Travelling wave semiconductor optical amplifiers . . 51
2.2.6.3 Erbium-doped fibre amplifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
2.3 Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.3.1 Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
2.3.1.1 Thermal and shot noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
2.3.1.2 Optical amplifier noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2.3.2 Power penalty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2.3.3 Demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
2.3.4 Clock Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
2.4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
3 OTDM Pulse Sources 66
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
3.2 OTDM pulse source design constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
3.2.1 Multiplexer impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
3.2.2 Demultiplexer impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
3.2.2.1 Extinction ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
3.2.2.2 Timing jitter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
3.3 Gain-Switched DFB (GS-DFB) pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
3.3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
3.3.2 Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
3.3.3 Optical pulse generation: Linear pulse compression . . . . . . 79
3.3.3.1 Dispersion compensating fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
3.3.3.2 Step-chirped fibre grating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
3.3.4 Optical pulse generation: Non-linear pulse compression . . . . 87
v
3.3.4.1 Constant dispersion fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.3.4.2 Dispersion decreasing fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
3.3.5 Timing Jitter impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.3.6 Timing Jitter measurement analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
3.4 Lithium Niobate data modulation and pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . 100
3.4.1 Lithium Niobate data modulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
3.4.2 Lithium Niobate optical pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
3.5 Electroabsorption modulator pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
3.5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
3.5.2 Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
3.5.3 Optical pulse generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
3.5.3.1 Direct modulation via an impulse generator at 500MHz107
3.5.3.2 Single EA Modulator Direct driven by 2.5GHz sinu-
soidal signal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
3.5.3.3 Serially concatenated EA Modulators (EAMs) driven
by 1GHz impulse generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
3.5.3.4 Actively mode-locked 1GHz ring laser using an EA
Modulator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
3.5.3.5 High repetition rate: 20GHz optical pulse generation 116
3.6 Hybrid (GS-DFB & EAM) pulse source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
3.6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
3.6.2 Optical pulse generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
3.6.2.1 Timing jitter reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
3.6.2.2 Pedestal suppression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
3.7 Summary and conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
4 OTDM channel selection 143
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
4.2 Electroabsorption modulator channel selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
4.2.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
4.2.1.1 Channel gating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
4.2.1.2 Critical issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
4.2.2 Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
4.2.2.1 Clock generation, data modulation and multiplexing 147
4.2.2.2 Clock recovery and channel gating . . . . . . . . . . 149
4.2.2.3 Specification of EA modulator . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
vi
4.2.2.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
4.2.2.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
4.3 Integrated Mach-Zehnder demultiplexer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
4.3.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
4.3.1.1 Interferometer fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
4.3.1.2 Switching speed and figures of merit . . . . . . . . . 153
4.3.1.3 Semiconductor optical amplifiers . . . . . . . . . . . 155
4.3.1.4 Heinrich-Hertz IMZI Device construction . . . . . . . 156
4.3.2 Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
4.3.2.1 Device operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
4.3.2.2 Switching window and gain recovery . . . . . . . . . 158
4.3.2.3 Channel selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
4.3.2.4 Device performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
4.3.2.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
4.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
5 Optical TDMA-based switching fabrics 169
5.1 Introduction and motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
5.2 Design considerations and constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
5.2.1 Switching speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
5.2.2 Redundancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
5.2.3 Topology and power budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
5.2.4 Synchronisation and data distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
5.2.5 Scalability and amplification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
5.3 SynchroLAN—all-optical channel selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
5.4 SynchroLAN—Twin fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
5.5 PC Clusters and ECOLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
5.6 IP Networks and routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
5.7 A Terabit/s interconnection fabric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
5.7.1 Clock-comb generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
5.7.2 Data-comb generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
5.7.3 Formation and distribution of O-WTDMA frame . . . . . . . 187
5.7.4 Maintenance of optical path-length/synchronisation of inter-
connect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
5.7.5 Demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
5.8 Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
vii
5.8.1 Power distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
5.8.2 Timing jitter and wavelength-dependent temporal skew . . . . 191
5.8.3 Interchannel Crosstalk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
5.8.4 Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
5.9 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
6 Conclusions 203
6.1 Optical TDMA pulse source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
6.2 Optical TDMA demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
6.3 Optical TDMA-based switching fabrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
6.4 Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
A Maxwells equations 209
A Publications 212
A.1 Patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
A.2 Journal and Conference papers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
A.3 Book Chapters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
A.4 Textbook references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
B Selected Publications 219
viii
List of Figures
1.1 Typical memory bandwidth hierarchy within a 100MHz computer. . . 6
1.2 Preferred interconnect technology: frequency-distance dependence. . . 9
1.3 Laser source for clock distribution to module boards within CrayT90
supercomputer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.4 Photonic Switching fabric: T: Transmitter; R: Receiver. . . . . . . . . 14
2.1 Shannon’s generalised communication network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.2 Typical TDM system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.3 Typical WDM system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.4 Typical OTDM system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.5 Bessel functions. (a) J0(ν) and (c) K0(ν) are physically realisable
in a optical fibre and can be “stitched” together with appropriate
boundary conditions to describe the fundamental mode of a sing;e-
mode optical fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
2.6 Typical Attenuation vs. Wavelength response of a Germania-doped
Silica optical fibre. (Data provided by D. L. Williams, BT Laborato-
ries.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.7 Total dispersion of a Germania-doped Silica optical fibre: (a) Stan-
dard fibre; (b) Dipersion shifted fibre. (source:http://www.corningfiber.com) 38
2.8 Gain versus wavelength for typical Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier . . 52
2.9 Generalised optoelectronic receiver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
2.10 Illustration of de-multiplexing: (a) WDM de-multiplexing; (b) OTDM
de-multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
2.11 Pulse (a) RZ signal; (b) clock; (c) random, zero-mean component. . . 59
3.1 Multiplexing impairments of an OTDM system: (a) incoherent inter-
ference between adjacent pulses; (b) solution shorter pulses. (Note
the idealised square switching window.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
ix
3.2 SNR vs. pulsewidth dependence on extinction ratio. Variation of
signal-to-noise ratio as a function of RZ pulsewidth for several pulse
extinction ratios from 40dB-54dB. (A 15ps FWHM gaussian demul-
tiplexing window with an extinction ratio of 100dB was used at the
receiver.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
3.3 Demultiplexing impairments: (a) Finite extinction ratio; (b) timing
jitter of demultiplexing window. (Note: dashed line represents the
de-multiplexing window.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
3.4 BER penalty versus demultiplexing switching window of a 40Gbit/s
RZ system: (a) 19-27dB extinction ratio. (Note: XRs = “Extinction
Ratios.”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
3.5 BER penalty versus demultiplexing switching window of a 40Gbit/s
RZ system: (a) 29-39dB extinction ratio. (Note: XRs = ”Extinction
Ratios.”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
3.6 Jitter-induced errors. (a) successive time-multiplexed channels; (b)
PDF of target channel, i, pulse arrival with respect to square switch-
ing window; (c) PDFs of neighbour channel, i-1-th and i+1-th, pulse
arrivals with respect to the square switching window. T: time slot
width; W: switching window width; p: error-probability of i-th chan-
nel arriving outside switching window; q: error-probability of i-1-th
(or i+1-th) channel arriving outside switching window. . . . . . . . . 72
3.7 Impact of RMS timing jitter and demultiplexing switching window
on BER performance of a 40Gbit/s RZ OTDM system. RMS timing
jitter values:(a) 5ps; (b) 2.5ps; (c) 2.0ps; (d) 1.5ps; (e) 1.0ps; (f) 800fs;
(g) 600fs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
3.8 400MHz electrical impulses from ‘500MHz’ Step-recovery diode/Impulse
generator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
3.9 Experimental arrangement for gain-switching of a DFB SLD. (IG: Im-
pulse generator; DCF: Dispersion Compensating Fibre; SCFG: Step-
chirped fibre grating.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
3.10 (a) Autocorrelation of direct output from gain-switched DFB. (b)
Spectral plot of direct output from gain-switched DFB. . . . . . . . . 81
3.11 (a) Autocorrelation after 300m Dispersion Compensating Fibre (DCF.)
(b) Spectral plot after 300m DCF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
x
3.12 Step Chirped Fibre Grating (SCFG) of length L schematic. Com-
prised of N sections of equal length, δl, with periods ranging from Λ1
to ΛN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
3.13 Transmission spectrum of Step Chirped Fibre Grating (SCFG) . . . . 85
3.14 (a) Autocorrelation after Step Chirped Fibre Grating (SCFG) com-
pression; (b) corresponding spectral plot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
3.15 (a) Autocorrelation after SCFG compression and spectral filtering;
(b) corresponding spectral plot (dashed curve corresponds to Fig-
ure 3.14(b).) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
3.16 Experimental Arrangement of Non-linear compression stage. EDFA:
Erbium-doped fibre amplifier; Er:Yb-DFA: Erbium:Ytterbium-doped
fibre amplifier; NLF: Non-linear fibre; A/C: Autocorrelator; S/A:
Spectrum Analyser. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.17 (a) autocorrelation @ 500MHz ;(b) spectrum @ 500MHz . . . . . . . 89
3.18 (a) autocorrelation @ 250 MHz;(b) spectrum @ 250MHz . . . . . . . 89
3.19 (a) Solitonic component (half-wave plate 0 degrees); (b) dispersive
wave component (half-wave plate 70 degrees). Rep. rate 400MHz . . 90
3.20 (a) Planar silica word generator; (b) Packaged device. . . . . . . . . 93
3.21 (a) Autocorrelation of 1.6ps pulse after DDF fibre; (b) Cross-correlation
of ’8-bit’ word. (Key: M, M : Marker bits; Ai(i = 1, 2, . . . , 6): Ad-
dress bits.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.22 Word generation from ’active’ planar silica delay element. (a) Word
1;(b) Word 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.23 Tektronix Communication Signal Analyser trace of timing and ampli-
tide jitter for a gain-switched DFB SLD. Note asymmetry in timing
jitter histogram which indicates an RMS timing jitter of ∼5.97ps.
(Horizontal scale 20ps/div, infinite persistence enabled.) . . . . . . . . 96
3.24 Illustration of turn-on event. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
3.25 RF spectra: Three main contributions: (1) δ functions represent the
fourier transfrom of the pulse train; (2) the amplitude noise is rep-
resented by the horizontal dashed line; and (3) the temporal jitter is
represented by the quadratic, ω2
, term. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
3.26 Electrical impulse generation of 12 volts, 70ps FWHM, from a step
recovery diode-voltage inverter combination at 500MHz. . . . . . . . . 102
xi
3.27 Application of electric field red-shifts absorption due to Quantum
Confined Stark Effect (QCSE.) E: Applied electric field; λop: Oper-
ational wavelength. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
3.28 Bound states in a Single Quantum Well (not to scale): (a) No electric
field E = 0; (b) Electric field appliedE = 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
3.29 (a) Polarisation sensitivity and (b) insertion loss for TE and TM
modes of a typical packaged discrete EA modulator. . . . . . . . . . . 106
3.30 Experimental arrangement for 500MHz EA modulator-based optical
pulse source. Key: CW-DFB: EA modulator: EA modulator; EDFA:
Erbium-doped fibre amplifier; Er:Yb-DFA: Erbium:Ytterbium-doped
fibre amplifier; DCF: Dispersion compensating fibre; S/A: Spectrum
analyser; A/C: Autocorrelator; SRD/INV: Step-recovery diode/voltage
inverter combination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
3.31 Optical pulsewidth as a function of reverse bias applied to EA mod-
ulator modulated by 500MHz electrical impulses. Key: +: No dis-
persion compensation; ×: 300m of dispersion compensating fibre.
(Dashed curves to guide eye.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
3.32 (a) Autocorrelation of output pulses at a reverse bias of 14 volts.
dashed curve represents autocorrelation of uncompressed pulses for
a reverse-bias of 10 volts. (b) Spectral plots of output pulses at a
reverse-bias of 14 volts. Dashed curve represents autocorrelation of
uncompressed pulses for a reverse bias of 10 volts. (Note: slight shift
of wavelength, +0.13nm, is due to gradual heating of the CW laser
as the experiment progressed.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
3.33 Experimental arrangement for single EA Modulator (EAM) driven
by 2.5GHz sinusoidal signal. EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre amplifier. . . 110
3.34 EA Modulator harmonics at 2.5GHz: (a) 2.5GHz pulse train; (b)
close-up of pulse showing 800fs RNS timing jitter.. . . . . . . . . . . . 110
3.35 EA Modulator harmonics at 2.5GHz: (a) pulsewidth (assumed gaus-
sian) versus reverse-bias voltage; (b) autocorrelation of pulses for a
reverse-bias of 10 volts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
3.36 Experimental arrangement for serially concatenated EA Modulators
driven by a pair of 1GHz impulse generators. EDFA: Erbium-doped
fibre amplifier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
3.37 Dual in-line EA Modulators (a) autocorrelation; (b) spectrum for
dual in-line autocorrelators drive by 1GHz SRDs. . . . . . . . . . . . 113
xii
3.38 Autocorrelation of dual in-line 1GHz SRDs with 6ps/nm compression
fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
3.39 Experimental configuration of 1GHz MLL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
3.40 Mode-locked laser at 1 GHz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
3.41 Mode-locked ring laser @ 1GHz but with compression fibre. (b) the
main problem is absence of closed-loop control to prevent the source
losing lock and drifting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
3.42 Experimental Arrangement. PC: Polarisation Controller; D: Fibre
Dispersion Parameter; DDF: Dispersion Decreasing Fibre; DCF: Dis-
persion Compensating Fibre; EDFA: Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier;
Yb:Er-DFA: Ytterbium: Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier. . . . . . . . . 117
3.43 Pulsewidth (assuming a hyperbolic secant squared pulse) as a func-
tion of power launched into Dispersion Decreasing Fibre. (a) 10GHz;
(b) 20GHz repetition rate. The arrow in (b) corresponds to auto-
correlation and spectral plot in Figure 3.44. (Dashed spline curve to
guide eye.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
3.44 (a) Autocorrelation and (b) corresponding spectral plot at 20 GHz
repetition rate. Launched power to DDF: 19.4dBm. . . . . . . . . . . 119
3.45 Experimental setup. GS-DFB: gain-switched distributed feedback
semiconductor laser diode; CW-ECL: continuous wave external cavity
laser; PC: polarisation controller; EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre ampli-
fier; DCF: dispersion compensating fibre.Note: ‘1,’ ‘2,’ ‘3’ and ‘4’
refer to the port number of the fused-fibre coupler. . . . . . . . . . . 121
3.46 High-speed sampling oscilloscope traces: (a) CW light injection off,
(b) CW light injection on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
3.47 RF spectra: (a) CW light injection off, (b) CW light injection on
(injected power was -8.4dBm, wavelength 1547.6nm, resolution band-
width 1.33MHz, Video bandwidth 1KHz.) The dashed line in (a) &
(b) is the noise floor of the instrument. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
3.48 Calculation of jitter: (a) plot used to calculate URTJ, CW off, (b)
plot used to calculate URTJ, CW on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
3.49 Jitter dependence: (a) uncorrelated RMS jitter as a function of wave-
length CW power -2dBm. Continuous line to guide eye, dashed line
is the gain-switched profile without CW injection; (b) Uncorrelated
root-mean-square (RMS) timing jitter as a function of CW injection
power. (CW injection wavelength 1547.8nm.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
xiii
3.50 Autocorrelations with CW light injection: (a) EA modulator off; (b)
EA Modulator on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
3.51 Cross-correlations of the gain-switched pulses—the implication of the
improved extinction ratio. (a) CW off, EA modulator off; (b) CW
on, EA Modulator off; and (c) CW on and EA modulator on. . . . . . 128
3.52 Filtering options: (a) Non-monotonic wavelength filtering; (b) Mono-
tonic temporal filtering. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
3.53 Alternative configurations: (a) In-line configuration; (b) Impulse gen-
erators further simplify set-up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
3.54 Alternative in-line arrangement of components. . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
4.1 OTDM Demultiplexing: (a) OTDM Frame; (b) Gating function; (c)
Demultiplexed channel, where ε is the on/off ratio of the gating de-
vice, in this case an EA modulator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
4.2 Switching window autocorrelations as a function of electroabsorption
modulator DC reverse-bias:(a) -3 volts; (b) -5 volts; (c) -7 volts. . . . 146
4.3 Demultiplexing: (a) Switching window; (b) Extinction ratio. . . . . . 147
4.4 Optical pulses: (a) autocorrelation and (b) spectrum. . . . . . . . . . 147
4.5 Interleaver operation. Eye diagram after LiNBO3 modulator: (a) no
jitter suppression; (b) Jitter suppression. (c) and (d) eye diagrams
of data channels in separate arms. (d) combined data channels; (f)
all-four data channels at output of multiplexer. PC: Polarisation con-
troller; PBS: Polarisation beamsplitter. ((a) & (b) 20GHz receiver;
(c)—(f) 45GHz receiver, 50GHz sampling oscilloscope.) . . . . . . . . 148
4.6 Demultiplexing section: Experimental arrangement. Rx: 2.5GHz re-
ceiver; BPF: 2.5GHz bandpass filter; PS: Microwave phase shifter; IG:
Impulse Generator; INV: Voltage inverter; PS: Polarisation splitter;
EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre amplifier; EA modulator Electroabsorp-
tion modulator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
4.7 Response of Impulse generator/voltage inverter combination to re-
covered 2.5GHz clock signal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
4.8 The four 215
-1 PRBS data channels recorded after the EA modulator.
Output of EA modulator channel selector. (a) channel 1; (b) channel
2; (c) channel 3; and (d) channel 4. (50 GHz sampling oscilloscope
with a 45 GHz photodiode.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
4.9 BER curves for channel 3. +: back-to-back; : selected channel. . . . 151
xiv
4.10 Mach-Zehnder interferometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
4.11 Typical HHI unpackaged IMZI device. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
4.12 Optical power as a function of current. Amp 1 200mA; Amp 2 varied.
(Dashed spline curves to guide eye.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
4.13 Switching window of HHI IMZI: (a) Gain recovery; (b) switching
window. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
4.14 Switching geometry of Integrated Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (IMZI)
for holding beam experiments. (Isolator and circulator configurations
are not shown.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
4.15 Gain recovery enhancement by holding beam (λ = 1544nm): (i) No
holding beam; (ii) one holding beam; (iii) two holding beams. . . . . 159
4.16 Switching geometry of Integrated Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (IMZI)
within READ section of SynchroLAN network node. Key: PBS:
Polarisation Beam Splitter; EDFA: Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier;
MMI: Multimode Interference coupler; w/s: Computer Workstation.
(Inset: Sampling oscilloscope traces of the six data channels received
with 45 GHz PiN photodiode. The noise evident for channel 2 is due
to the maladjusted phase of the data signal from the PPG.) . . . . . 160
4.17 Channel selection from 40Gbit/s data stream (50 GHz sampling os-
cilloscope, 45 GHz p-i-n photodiode.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
4.18 Reflections: (i) Both SOA’s off; (ii) SOA 1 on; (iii) SOA 2 on; (iv)
SOA 1 & SOA 2 on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
4.19 Indirect evidence of reflected clock leakage into data channels. For
example (a) channel 1 switched-out, interference effect 100ps behind
in Channel 4; (b) channel 2 switched-out, interference effect 100ps
behind in Channel 5; (c) channel 3 switched-out, interference effect
100ps behind in Channel 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
5.1 Generic re-entrant bus: W: Write section; R: Read Section; αi: tap-
ping ratio of i-th tap; βcr: coupler excess loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
5.2 SynchroLAN re-entrant bus: W: Write section; R: Read Section; αi:
tapping ratio of i-th tap; βcr: coupler excess loss; βxs: aggregated
excess loss of Write section of node . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
5.3 Required number of couplers between amplifier stages . . . . . . . . . 176
xv
5.4 Number of couplers, n−i, between amplifiers as a function of coupling
ratio, α. Where Psat = +20dBm; Receiver sensitivity for a BER of
10−9
at 2.5Gbit/s ∼ −30dBm; Pmin ∼ −21dBm; Coupler excess loss,
β = 0.5dB and the combined insertion loss, γ = 6dB . . . . . . . . . . 177
5.5 SynchroLAN demonstrator: Key: W: Write section of node, R: Read
section of node; PBS: Polarisation Beam Splitter . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
5.6 SynchroLAN schematic. W: Write section of node; R: Read section of
node; FFC: Fused-fibre coupler. Inset: ∼600fs timing jitter of pulses
after 300m blown fibre. Clock pulse triggered oscilloscope, data pulse
displayed. (45MHz pin diode, 50GHz sampling oscilloscope) . . . . . 180
5.7 Write (W) section of node. VOD: Variable Optical Delay; EAM:
Electroabsorption modulator; FFC: Fused-fiber coupler. (Inset: Six
data channels. 45MHz pin diode, 50GHz sampling oscilloscope.) . . . 181
5.8 Read (R) section of node. Rx: electronic receiver; EDFA: Erbium
doped fibre amplifier; EAM: Electroabsorption modulator. (Inset IG:
Impulse Generator; BPF: Bandpass Filter; MPS: Microwave Phase
Shifter; PS: Phase Shifter.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
5.9 Channel selection from 40 Gbit/s data frame for: (a) node 1,(b) node
2 & (c) node 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
5.10 BER curves for each node. (a) Node 1: Dual-frequency drive; (b)
Node 2: Single impulse generator drive; (c) Node 3: Dual impulse
generator drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
5.11 SynchromoLAN schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
5.12 8 Node interconnect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
5.13 Hub-node schematic. Note: AWG omitted for clarity. W: WRITE;
R: READ; PLL: Phase-locked loop; BPF: Band-pass filter; µPS: mi-
crowave phase shifter; FS: Fibre Stretcher; IG: Impulse Generator. . . 188
5.14 Composition of 16×16 and 1×16 couplers: a) 4×4 coupler; b) Several
4 × 4 couplers are suitably connected to form a 16 × 16 coupler; (c)
1 × 16 coupler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
xvi
5.15 Schematic of the path taken by the N wavelengths assigned to one
time slot through the interconnect. Key: AWG: Arrayed waveguide
grating; EAM: Elactroabsorption modulators; FD: fibre delay. 1)
At the AWG the wavelength channels are aligned within the time
slot; 2) The EAMs are located at the termination of a fibre spoke
and are subject to wavelength-dependent temporal skew; 3) the fibre
delays after the EAMs are adjusted appropriately to ensure temporal
alignment of the wavelength channels within the time slot at the
N × N coupler; 4) the second traversal of the fibre spoke towards the
WRITE section of the node induces wavelength-dependent temporal
skew; 5) the fibre delays are used once again to re-align the channels
prior to the EAM array. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
5.16 Power penalty arising from the finite rejection of adjacent wavelength
channels for unamplified, 10 and 16 channel systems. . . . . . . . . . 195
xvii
List of Tables
2.1 Classification and properties of normal and anomalously dispersive
optical fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.1 Specification of dispersion decreasing fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
3.2 Sampling oscilloscope channel jitter measurements. . . . . . . . . . . 98
3.3 Classification and properties of the various pulse sources described in
this chapter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
4.1 Non-linear optical properties and figure of merit of several material
systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
5.1 Classification of switching speeds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
5.2 Optical fibre characteristics from ref. [8]. D, is the group delay disper-
sion; λo, is the zero-dispersion wavelength; θ, is the temperature; So, is
the dispersion slope. dλ/dθ|λ=λo , is the thermal coefficient term. NZ-
DSF: non-zero dispersion shifted fibre, LCF: large-core fibre, DFF:
dispersion-flattened fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
xviii
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Historical background
1.1.1 Information transmission
The digital communication age began when Samuel Morse invented both telegraphy
and morse code1
in 1835 [1]. At that time a good morse operator could transmit
10 bit/s of information. Western Union commercialised telegraphy in 1844 and laid
the first operational transatlantic telegraphic cable by 1866 [1]. Ten years later, on
March 10 1876 to be precise [2], in the attic of a boarding house in Boston, Mas-
sachusetts Alexander Graham Bell used twisted-pair copper wires to transmit the
words, “Mr. Watson, come here. I want you [2, 3]” to his colleague in the adjoining
room and so with the telephone laid the foundation of the present information age.
At the beginning of the sixties T H Maiman at the Hughes Research Laboratory
provided the first demonstration of a device that emitted coherent electromagnetic
radiation—the ruby laser. Several competing groups [4, 5, 6, 7] announced coherent
emission at 900nm from small, compact Gallium-Arsenide (GaAs) semiconductor
laser diodes at 77K within weeks of one another. The spectral purity and low-spatial
divergence of laser light held great promise for the transmission of information over
free-space point-to-point links. However the transmission distance was limited by
environmental conditions such as rain and fog.
By 1966, Kao and Hockham [8] suggested that thin, glass optical fibres could
provide a channel for transporting information using infrared light—including lasers,
but only if the then huge material losses ∼1000dB/km could be reduced to ∼20dB/km.
1
On 31st December 1997 morse code was discontinued as the global means of conveying distress
at sea!
1
Chapter 1 2 Introduction
In April 1970 one of the co-inventors of low-loss optical fibre, Donald Keck from
Corning, wrote in his notebook of his measurement on a 1m sample of optical fi-
bre: “Attenuation equals 16dB. Eureka! [9]” Later that year, at an IEE conference
in London, Corning announced the fabrication of an optical fibre with a loss of ∼
20dB/km at ∼900nm. So as the Seventies unfolded the possibility began to emerge
of using a modulated laser source to transmit information within an optical fibre.
By the latter half of the seventies this possibility became reality as several field trials
of optical fibre systems were deployed. In the UK one of the first trials ran from
BT Laboratories to Ipswich telephone exchange: 8 Mbit/s over 13km. In 1979 Miya
and co-workers [10] reported the fabrication of a single-mode optical fibre with a
loss of 0.2dB/km. The most significant advance in optical fibre transmission during
the eighties concerned the demonstration of lasing and amplification in single-mode,
Erbium-doped silica fibres, pumped by semiconductor lasers [11]. Fibre attenua-
tion could now be compensated by in-fibre optical gain element. Wavelength- and
time- division multiplexing technologies were then developed to increase the aggre-
gate data rate that could be supported by a single optical fibre. By February 1998
this had advanced sufficiently for Lucent Technlogies to announce a commercial 400
Gbit/s WDM system called Wavestar
TM
.
1.1.2 Information processing
In parallel with the developments in information transmission, remarkable advances
have been made in computer technology. The first computing engine design, al-
beit mechanical, is attributed to Charles Babbage and his Difference Engine in the
19th Century—although it wasn’t actually built until recently. The first electronic
computer was demonstrated by Mauchley and Eckert in 1946 [12]. They called it
the ENIAC and the logic gates were based on unreliable, bulky and power-hungry
triode valves. A recurring theme during the evolution of computer technology is
the reduction in physical size of the logic elements. Such an opportunity was pre-
sented in 1947 when John Bardeen and Walter Brattain invented the transistor [13].
Two years later, Maurice Wilkes at Cambridge University demonstrated EDSAC,
the world’s first general purpose stored-program computer. At about the same time
that T H Maiman was demonstrating the first laser, Fairchild Semiconductor pro-
duced the worlds first integrated circuit that comprised four transistors. By 1971
Intel had produced the first microprocessor, the 4004. The following year Chuck
Thacker at Xerox PARC started to design what is now widely recognised as the first
Chapter 1 3 Introduction
personal computer—the Alto [14]. As that decade came to an end personal com-
puters such as the Apple II were in some businesses and fewer homes. Then in 1981
the IBM PC was announced and it ushered in the era of a computer on every desk
and within many homes. It has now evolved into cheap PC-based, multi-processor
workstations.
1.1.3 Local- and wide- area networks
The forerunner of the Internet—ARPANET—began with just four nodes on the west
coast of the US in 1969. Interoperability was assured between the many different
proprietary protocols by Cerf and Kahn with their development of the TCP/IP in-
ternetworking protocol suite in 1974 [15]. In 1976 Xerox PARC introduced 3Mbit/s
Ethernet [16] which has evolved into the worlds most ubiquitous Local Area Network
(LAN) technology. The latest version—Gigabit Ethernet [17] is capable of switch-
ing and routing at 1Gbit/s allowing full-duplex interconnections at wire speed. A
10Gbit/s version is near completion and 100Gbit/s Ethernet and even Terabit/s
Ethernet are likely to follow. By 1983 the widespread adoption of TCP/IP allowed
many other wide-area networks such as the NFSNET and MILNET to form a net-
work that spanned the globe—the Internet [15]. The 1990s were notable for the
emergence of the Internet particularly the world-wide web (WWW) and the ex-
plosive growth of private intranets and extranets. The WWW has pervaded every
aspect of the work and home environments.
At the turn-of-the-millenium information is truly an economic force: the timely
transmission and sharing of this information is now a valuable and exploitable
commodity. But at its foundation is the abilty to generate and disseminate such
information-rich content via fast processor chips, fast interconnects, and fast switch-
ing systems. It is widely appreciated (and endured) that WWW is an acronym for
“world wide wait” studies have concluded that the effective bandwidth available to
Internet users is a mere 40Kbit/s [18]!
To this end in an attempt to increase bandwidth and reduce latency new protocol
stacks that place IP directly on top of an optical layer and render the SONET/SDH
layer2
superfluous are emerging. Moreover network technology that was traditionally
implemented in software is now being performed with faster, dedicated hardware
with an attendent reduction in latency [19].
2
At the time of writing Cisco systems can provide 2.5Gbit/s optical interface cards running
their Dynamic Packet Transport technology which is an implemetation of ‘IP over Optics.’
Chapter 1 4 Introduction
1.2 Emerging trends and Limitations
1.2.1 Market drivers
Advances in computing technology for example rapidly increasing processor clock
speeds [20], allied with the push towards multi-processor computer platforms3
re-
quire ever-faster interconnection networks for high speed communication both within
and between computing machines or networking devices at various length scales that
span several hierarchies of interconnect:
• Intra-chip—Optics has a minimal impact because of the small dimensions typ-
ical on this scale which allow huge interconnect densities [21] Dimension on
the order of µm
• Inter-chip—of the order of mm’s
• MCM-to-MCM—Multichip module to multichip module cm’s
• PCB-to-PCB—Printed circuit board to printed circuit board distances up to
• Backplane to backplane over distances greater than say 20cm. Reconfiguration
likely
• Rack-to-rack—several metres
• System Area Networks—1m-to-1km
Desirable attributes for all these hierarchies include low latency, high bandwidth and
fast reconfiguration of the interconnection fabric. The applications at the so-called
‘bleeding-edge’ that drive these advances include [22]:
• Cryptography
• Nuclear weapons design
• Atmospheric dynamics simulations
• Fly-by-wire aircraft
• Synthethic aperture radar
• Molecular dynamics/Pharamaceuticals
3
At time of writing (March 1999) the Cray T3E-1200 can contain up to 2048, 600MHz processors
providing a peak performance of 2.5Teraflops.
Chapter 1 5 Introduction
• Oil exploration
• Synthethic theatres of war.
• Distributed interactive collaborative environments
1.2.2 Inter-chip: removal of the Von Neumann bottleneck
The application of advanced lithographic techniques that reduce the feature size on
processor and memory chips permit a ×4 increase in the number of transistors per
die every three years in-line with Moore’s law. There is no sign that this trend is
likely to stop. But whilst the clock speed of processors is increasing by 60% annu-
ally, memory speed is increasing at a mere 10% over the same interval [23]. This is
important because the Von Neumann architecture, that is predominant today and
which emerged during the forties, separates the processing unit from the memory
unit via an interconnect [24]. Consequently various trade-offs are carefully weighed
to amorotise the mismatch in latency and bandwidth between the processor and
memory. The use of a hierarchy of on- and off-chip caches [25] is one particular
example. But it relies on software compliers that make the best use of the caches
through temporal and spatial data locality in the processors references to mem-
ory [21]. Figure 1.1 graphically illustrates the bandwidth hierarchy of the memory
system (32 MBytes of 16Mbit DRAM) within an admittedly dated 100MHz com-
puter [26]. Most striking is that the bandwidth available within the memory is some
3000 times larger than that provided by the I/O pins—the bottleneck is mostly due
to the pins [27]. The most telling feature is how bandwidth is progressively squan-
dered as hierarchies of elements are crossed within the chip. The net effect is to
increase latency leaving the processor idle for several clock cycles. Moreover mod-
ern computer designs include advanced graphic engines for multimedia rendering
that compete with the processor for a share of the memory bandwidth which makes
matters worse still [28]. Taken together the memory latency, reduced bandwidth and
the faster clock speed serve to conspire against processor efficiency and represent
a large and growing gap between the processor and memory variously termed the
“von Neumann bottleneck” [29] or “memory wall” [30, 31].
However since it is now possible to include additional features and, by implica-
tion, functionality upon a single die a persuasive argument has emerged which con-
tends that if you cannot bring the memory bandwidth to the processor then why not
bring the processor to the memory? This idea for processor-memory integration has
various names: Computational RAM (CRAM) [26]; Intelligent RAM (IRAM) [23];
Chapter 1 6 Introduction
1TB/s100GB/s10GB/s1GB/s100MB/s
(c) Duncan Elliott 1998, used with permission
Figure 1.1: Typical memory bandwidth hierarchy within a 100MHz computer.
processor-in-memory (PIM) [32]. When implemented it has been conservatively es-
timated that the latency would be reduced by ×10, whilst the bandwidth available
between the memory and the processor would increase ×100 [23]. An additional
benefit that would accrue is that interactions between the PIM and off-chip inter-
connect would be reduced ×100 [33]. In addition a portion of the PIM chip could
be dedicated to re-configurable logic cells so that tailored functionality could be
incorporated after fabrication perhaps dynamically in-situ [32, 34] with attendent
benefits of scale and cost reductions. Once PIM chips become a commercial reality
then multi-PIM computers or networking elements that communicate to neighbour-
ing elements within a cabinet or across a network will emerge. This would shift
the bandwidth and latency bottlenecks onto the interconnection fabric that exists
”outside-the-box” and so low-latency, high bandwidth interconnections to service
this need will be at a premium.
1.2.3 SAN: System Area Networks
Working in the opposite direction it is now widely recognised that many of these
applications can be implemented more cost-effectively using low-cost, networks of
workstations (NOW) [35]. Scalability is possible by just adding more workstations.
Chapter 1 7 Introduction
Commodity computer clusters are challenging conventional supercomputers in terms
of processing power but for a fraction of the cost. Beowulf from IBM is one working
example that uses conventional LAN technology to interconnect commodity PCs via
standard interface cards connected to the PCI bus4
.
That said the type of problems that can be addressed require a high ratio of
computation-to-communication because of the high latency overhead of conventional
LAN technologies and access via the PCI bus. Consequently problems or applica-
tions that require a low ratio of computation-to-communication are less successful.
To address this deficiency an emerging trend has been to scale-up high-performance
electronic interconnects typical of supercomputers to local-area network (LAN) di-
mensions. These so-called system area networks (SANs) span distances ranging
from 1m-1km—falls between that within a supercomputer cabinet and that of a
LAN [36, 23].
The most commercially successful SAN, to date, is produced by Myricom net-
works. The Myricom approach is centred on an 8-port electronic crossbar-based hub.
Each one of up to 8 hosts is attached to the hub by an electrical cable containing 18
separate twisted pairs (9 in each direction) that allows parallel bi-directional data
transfer of 9-bit words over distances of up to 25m at 1.28Gbit/s (160MByte/s) [37].
Specialised cards interface to the the memory bus within each workstation. The su-
percomputer supernet testbed (SST) envisages internetworking between Myrinet
switches to form a wide area network (WAN) that could interconnect supercom-
puters throughout the west coast of the US [38]. If the Myrinet approach is a
scaling-up of traditional electronic supercomputer fabric. An alternative approach
is to scale-down both developed and emerging technologies in optical networking
which have not been considered applicable over short distances (<1km) [39, 40].
The next section will argue why this alternative approach is now needed.
1.3 Electrical Problems and Optical Solutions
1.3.1 Physical limits of Electrical interconnects
Present-day computers rely on metallic interconnects for chip-chip interconnections.
However the bandwidth that they can provide is now coming up against hard phys-
ical limits. The main constraints include the increase in signal attenuation with
4
17 IBM netfinity servers containing 36 Pentium chips and running the Linux operating system
have equalled the performanace of a $5.5Million Cray T3T-900-AC64 in rendering a ray tracing,
image rendering a ray tracing program. The IBM Beowulf cluster cost only $150,000!
Chapter 1 8 Introduction
propagation length at frequencies above 1GHz due to the skin-effect resistance of
the metallic track and the nature of the dielectric substrate.
A metric has been proposed based on the aspect ratio–the ratio of propagation
length to cross-sectional area–of cu-based interconnects [41]. This maintains that for
a given length, an interconnect comprising many, small cross-section wires running
at low data rates is equivalent to a few, large cross-section wires running at high data
rates. Traditionally the problem of providing high bandwidth was addressed by the
former approach—spatially multiplexing a flat array of adjacent, parallel metallic
tracks at low signalling frequencies. But as computer clock rates increase so the
adverse effect of capacitative coupling between adjacent tracks leads to enhanced
crosstalk with a consequent loss of data integrity. Data skew between tracks requires
additional de-skewing circuitry and requires careful spatial routing of tracks within
the machine. Consequently there has been a gradual shift away from multiple,
narrow parallel tracks running at 100MHz towards a single serial track operating
at 1+ GHz. The benefits that follow from this approach include the greatly reduced
skew of a single track over several parallel tracks and the relaxation of track routing
constraints.
However as clock frequencies increase above 1GHz, the physical limitations inher-
ent in a metallic interconnection network become apparent. Figure 1.2 [42] illustrates
this in graphic form. In effect, each point-to-point link acts as an antenna that
serves as both a source and a sink of time-varying, radio frequency (RF) noise en-
ergy commonly called electromagnetic interference (EMI.) For example, RF noise
energy transmitted to, and received from, the surroundings can affect the decision at
receiver modules and induce phantom data events that cause incoherence between
memory registers. In addition, the fan-out and radiation-induced energy losses need
to be compensated by amplifiers to ensure an adequate signal-to-noise ratio at the
termination points of the system. But the introduction of amplifiers increases noise
and adds to the thermal load and power consumption of the system. Moreover,
thermal variations of the resistance cause variations in the signal phase that require
additional control elements. Nevertheless a pristine, untapped and properly termi-
nated single track with specialised dielectric substrate has been demonstrated to
9.6Gb/s over 0.5m. But this must be qualified by noting that improperly termi-
nated signal taps along the span of the interconnect would adversely impact signal
quality due to reflections from impedance mismatches. Optical Interconnects can
provide a solution to this problem.
Chapter 1 9 Introduction
10
10
10
10
10
10
13
12
11
9
8
10
10
10
7
6
frequency,Hz
distance, m
Transmission Line
Optics
Wire
1010
-2 -1
1 10
1
10
2
10
3
10
-3
Figure 1.2: Preferred interconnect technology: frequency-distance dependence.
1.3.2 Optical Interconnects emerge
It is easy to appreciate how interconnects have now become the dominant factor
in determining both the productivity and performance of computer technology [43].
Consequently data transfer rates within and between computing machines are sub-
ject to performance bottlenecks that expose the bandwidth limitations of electrical
interconnects and offer a compelling case for optical interconnects.
Amongst the compelling advantages of an opticall interconnect are [44]:
• High distance-bandwidth product: through much lower attenuation and greatly
reduced frequency dependent effects requiring fewer amplifiers.
• EMI immunity providing excellent isolation between data channels.
• High packing density through reduced weight and volume allow greater free-
dom to the system architect.
• Greatly enhanced bandwidth per track through the use of wave-, time-, or
spatial multiplexing can be used to extend the total bandwidth of the fibre
Chapter 1 10 Introduction
and not be hampered by the limited operational frequency of end-components:
Transmitter modulation and receiver demodulation.
It is this last point that is central to the use of optical fibre, namely the three
bandwidth-enhanced degrees of freedom: spatial, spectral and temporal that can be
provided by optical fibre. For example a number of optical fibres can be assembled
into a spatial multiplex. In turn the wide spectral bandwidth available within each
individual fibre can be utilised for wavelength multiplexing of several distinct data
channels. Each wavelength channel can, in turn, be time-multiplexed in the optical
domain into further independently modulated channels.
A suitable combination of spatial-, wavelength and time-multiplexing can form
a very high capacity interconnect albeit limited by the constraints particular to
each degree of freedom i.e. chromatic dispersion in OTDM system or crosstalk in
a WDM system [?]. For example a range of 16 applied to each dimension gives
an aggregated capacity of over 40Tbit/s (= Modulating frequency of 10GHz x 16
fibres x 16 wavelength channels x 16 time channels.) Of course suitable multiplexing
transmitters and de-multiplexing receivers are required at the access-points of the
system.
But the main constraint to the use of optical interconnects has been down to
economics. Traditionally fibre optic component costs, when compared to their cop-
per brethren, were very much more expensive. Whilst silica optical fibre is cost
comparable to copper, the higher cost of end equipment such as transmitters and
receivers has rendered it viable for all but low-volume, high-margin telecommuni-
cation systems and supercomuters. However this is changing due to the economies
of scale that flow from the mass-production of advanced optical sources such as
distributed feedback (DFB) lasers and high-bandwidth optoelectronic receivers for
deployment in local and wide-area network technologies such as Gigabit Ethernet
and SONET/SDH. Consequently the distance over which optical interconnects com-
bined with advanced switching techniques are becoming economically attractive has
been shrinking continuously [45].
1.3.3 A practical demonstration: Optical Clock Distribu-
tion
Computing machines that contain two or more processors present the software en-
gineer with a concurrent programming environment that considerably lightens the
programming task. This concurrency is ultimately derived from a central clock
Chapter 1 11 Introduction
source based on a quartz crystal oscillator that generates a global timing reference.
The timing reference is fanned-out and electrically propagated across an interconnec-
tion network comprised of many copper- (or aluminium-) based point-to-point links
that terminate on the spatially dispersed timing modules located on every printed
circuit board, each of which contains one or several processors. The timing module
provides a local timing reference from which the event transitions for the hardware
registers originate. Consequently all local atomic data transition events that occur
within the hardware registers of the processors can be traced to a common source
and hence can be treated as being globally synchronous.
The excess time per clock cycle that remains after each register transition is
referred to as the clock margin. Insufficient clock margin can cause a register to
load or store data either before it has become valid or after it is no longer valid.
Both are manifest as data incoherence between the dispersed registers which if left
unchecked can lead to errors. The clock margin, then, serves to mitigate this effect
by providing timing slack for all global event transitions to occur and settle. But as
machines become physically larger the timing skew arising from the differences in
propagation delay between the dispersed point-to-point links increases and requires
careful design to manage the clock tolerances. These tolerances are now set to
become even tighter as the clock frequency of processors exceeds the 1GHz (sub
1ns) barrier. Moreover the proportion of timing jitter as a fraction of the clock
cycle period becomes more pronounced and places tight constraints on the design
of interconnections between modules.
For these reasons designers of advanced multiprocessor computing machines have
turned their attention towards optical interconnections for clock distribution [46].
Early attempts used free-space optics and weren’t practical propositions because
of the alignment tolerances and mechanical stability as well as clear line-of-sight
optical paths [47] that were required. In this context the benefits of optical fibre
are many. Optical fibre provides a noise-free clock conduit that neither generates
or is affected by RF interference. Its broad bandwidth (tens of THz) can support
high clock transmission rates per optical fibre strand. Silica based optical fibre, in
particular, has extremely low-attenuation and occupies 1/50th the area of a copper
equivalent. It is not constrained by line-of-sight and is mechanically stable
A less well-appreciated advantage of optical interconnects is related to the grow-
ing problem of thermal management and heat dissipation within a modern computer
system [48]. At the microscopic level the increased density of gates on each proces-
sor die adds to the heat flux of the system and this must be serviced at all levels
Chapter 1 12 Introduction
right up to the cabinet level. Modern multiprocessor systems must remove of the
order 10kW/cm2
of thermal flux. To put this into perspective a thermal flux of
100W/cm2
would be typical one mile from the blast centre of a 1 megaton nuclear
device [49]. At the very least this requires additional cooling elements to remove
the excess generated. To reduce this effect it is necessary to move the processing
elements further apart, in effect trading latency against thermal load. But if the
processing elements are moved apart then the data rate must be reduced because of
the physical limitations such as crosstalk and frequency dependent attenuation of
the Cu-based interconnects that have been outlined earlier.
Somewhat less appreciated is the real-estate constraints that compel manufac-
turers to keep the footprint and overall volume of a system tightly constrained in
line with standardised racking systems. The small cross-sectional area coupled with
its physical flexibility allows optical fibre to make full use of the 3rd dimension to
thread its way through the restricted passages and the confined spaces found within
these machines. The low expansion coefficient and refractive index variation are
particularly compelling reasons for choosing optical fibre. The fast rising edge of
an optical clock distribution system can provide a precise decision point to initi-
ate switching. In fact the viability of the optical approach for clock distribution
has been experimentally demonstrated in the laboratory [50] and found sufficiently
compelling for deployment within a commercial supercomputer system [46]. The
latter is shown in Figure 1.3 where Cray have implemented a laser clock distribu-
tion system for their T90 supercomputer. More recently, Cray have described a
Source: Carol Kleinfield, Cray Research
Figure 1.3: Laser source for clock distribution to module boards within CrayT90
supercomputer.
Chapter 1 13 Introduction
more advanced, yet potentially lower-cost, version of the clock distribution optics
based on low-cost polyimide waveguides [51].
1.4 Optical data distribution
The next logical step is to extend the use of optics from clock distribution to data
distribution within multi-processor computing systems. Architecturally, clock dis-
tribution is a fanned-out, unidirectional broadcast with a static configuration. In
contrast a data interconnect needs to support bi-directional operation between the
connected nodes. A facility for dynamic reconfiguration that allows any node to
exchange data with any other node is also required. The bandwidth requirements
are substantially higher than for clock distribution and this mandates some form of
multiplexing.
Early attempts at increasing the transmission capacity with optoelectonics used
spatial divivion multiplexing techniques (SDM) utilising multiple fibre ribbon cables.
For example Kaede et al. [52] demonstrated 12×14 Megabit/s in 1990. Since then
research has focussed on low-cost, high-volume versions comprising data-modulated
vertical cavity, surface emitting laser (VCSEL) array transmitters and metal-semiconductor-
metal (MSM) receiver arrays with the interconnection fabric provided by polyimide
ribbon cable. A commercially mature implementation of this technology was devel-
oped during the POLO-2 initiative providing for two contradirectional 10×1Gbit/s
interconnections with an aggregated bandwidth of 20Gbit/s [53].
Yet one single-mode fibre can provide isolation of several independently modu-
lated channels via wavelength division multiplexing. The data transmitted at each
separate wavelength is independent of its neighbours so in effect it forms a virtual rib-
bon cable [54]. All wavelengths are subject to identical environmental effects but do
suffer from deterministic wavelength-dependent data skew. However over extended
distances recent suggestions [55] utilise adaptive electronic bit-skew compensation
and demonstrations [56, 57] have underlined the potential of this approach.
1.5 Shared-media Interconnects
A generic switching fabric is shown in Figure 1.4. Every node contains a transmit-
ter (T) and a receiver (R) to interconvert data between the optical domain within
the fabric and the electrical domain within the attached workstations. In a pho-
tonic packet switching network the route followed by optical packets between the
Chapter 1 14 Introduction
node1
nodeN
R
T
R
T
R
T
R
T
node3
node2
Photonic
Switching
Fabric
Figure 1.4: Photonic Switching fabric: T: Transmitter; R: Receiver.
source and destination nodes might not be explicitly prescribed. Instead reliance
is placed upon statistical multiplexing which assumes that the bursty nature of the
traffic originating from the nodes after aggregation within the fabric is averaged and
smoothed-out with time. However recent measurements on real networks contradicts
this assumption: traffic aggregation within a network tends to be self-similar on all
time scales and across different length scales from LANs [59] to WANS [60, 61, 62].
Should the aggregated demand for bandwidth exceed that which the fabric can sup-
port then buffering must be provided lest packets be discarded. But buffering can
introduce variable packet latency and out-of-order delivery. Both are undesirable
for real-time multimedia applications such as video.
It would be more useful to establish dedicated connections between nodes across
the photonic fabric and where each connection provides bandwidth in excess of
that generated by, or acceptable to, a node. Now when a connection is established
bandwidth is guaranteed and buffering is unnecessary thus allowing sustained data
transfer without the latency that arises from packet segmentation/reassembly and
buffering—the path between source and destination nodes is explicitly prescribed
and the latency is deterministically defined. However to establish a connection
the underlying network topology becomes critical. It can take several geometric
forms including Bus, Star, Ring, Tree, Mesh, Cubes, Hypercubes [36, 63]. Ideally
the chosen topology should allow connections to be established on-demand and
independently of other traffic within the photonic fabric i.e. be non-blocking.
A shared medium interconnection fabric can allow several nodes to interconnect
Chapter 1 15 Introduction
independently and concurrently through a sequential assignment of time (or wave-
length) slots, one per node. Data from the write section of a node is time- (or
wavelength-) multiplexed onto the shared optical fibre. The use of tunable time
slot selectors (or wavelength filters) at the receive section of each node allows the
channel of interest to be chosen for reception. The selector must have temporal
(or wavelength) agility to allow synchronisation (in the case of a TDMA network,)
or wavelength stability (within a WDMA network.) Shared medium interconnects
have been usefully classified as [64, 65]
1. Fixed-Transmitter(s), Fixed-Receiver(s) (FT-FR)
2. Tunable-Transmitter(s), Fixed-Receiver(s) (TT-FR)
3. Fixed-Transmitter(s), Tunable-Receiver(s) (FT-TR)
4. Tunable-Transmitter(s), Tunable-Receiver(s) (TT-TR)
The latter two, FT-TR and TT-TR, provide a broadcast and select network where
the transmission from one node can be received by one, many or all other node(s).
The TT-TR approach, though, suffers from an inablilty to broadcast efficiently as
well as the possibility of blocking.
To date most research into single-hop, shared-medium networks has been fo-
cussed on WDM implementations. Examples would include LAMBDANET [66]
from Bellcore which used a FT-FR configuration. Two versions were demonstrated:
18 wavelengths × 1.5 Gbit/s and 16 wavelengths × 2 Gbit/s. At the receive section
of a node the aggregated wavelength channels were spatially separated with each
allocated a separate receiver. The channel of interest was selected electronically.
Rainbow from IBM [67] was a FT-TR network with a broadcast star topology sup-
porting 32 workstations @ 200Mbit/s per wavelength channel. Signaling to effect
channel allocation was distributed to all nodes using a dedicated wavelength channel
that required an additional FT-FR pair within each node. In contrast, there have
been few demonstrations of TDM based interconnects. This is sightly surprising
since clock distribution and recovery is a common requirement of all systems. Barry
et al [68, 69] demonstrated a FT-TR, star-based, implementation that used a non-
linear optical loop mirror (NOLM) for channel gating in a lone receiver. The lack
of additional independent receivers limited the functionality to broadcast-only—bi-
directional transmission was not possible. Bi-directionality is necessary to properly
demonstrate a network. In this thesis the steps that led to the construction of such
a system will be reported.
Chapter 1 16 Introduction
1.6 Thesis Outline
This thesis describes the key ideas and components that were used to construct
a 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA interconection fabric which was used to interconnect
high-specification Unix workstations. The thesis will deliberately constrain itself
to the “optical plumbing” of this single-stage (single-hop) distributed switching fab-
ric. Chapter 2 which follows will develop the technical background that underpins
the thesis as well as outlining some of the common ideas within modern optical
communications systems. Chapter 3 will describe the various optical pulse source
technologies that were considered for the transmitter and will justify why one—based
on a combination of a gain-switched DFB laser diode and an electroabsorption mod-
ulation was chosen. Chapter 4 describes two separate demultiplexing techniques one
based on traditional optoelectronic clock recovery that utilised an electroabsorption
modulator, the other based on all-optical clock recovery that used an integrated
Mach-Zehnder inteferometer. Chapter 5 will describe how the work of Chapter 3
and Chapter 4 was synthesised and extended to construct a 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA
interconnection fabric that used the common optical fibre infrastructure within a
building. It will also outline an enhancement that uses wavelength-division multi-
plexing to increase the aggregate bandwidth. The work will be reviewed and an
attempt made to put it into context in Chapter ??. A list of patents, publications
and references generated during the course of the work described in the thesis will
be given in Appendix A. Finally Appendix B includes a copy of the patent that
arose from some of the work described in Chapter 3 as well as a small selection of
the peer-reviewed publications that were generated.
Bibliography
[1] J. Bray, “The first telegraph and cable engineers,” in The communications
miracle: The telecommunications pioneers from Morse to the Information Su-
perhighway, ch. 3, pp. 35–47, New York: Plenum Press, 1 ed., 1995.
[2] R. Rapaport, “What does a Nobel prize for radio astronomy have to do with
your telephone?,” Wired Magazine, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 124–134, April 1995.
[3] J. Bray, “The first telephone engineers,” in The communications miracle: The
telecommunications pioneers from Morse to the Information Superhighway,
ch. 4, pp. 49–59, New York: Plenum Press, 1 ed., 1995.
[4] R. N. Hall, G. E. Fenner, J. D. Kingsley, T. J. Soltys, and R. O. Carlson, “Coher-
ent light emission from GaAs junctions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 9, pp. 366–368,
Nov. 1 1962. (Received Sept. 24, 1962).
[5] M. I. Nathan, W. P. Dumke, G. Burns, F. H. Dill, and G. Lasher, “Stimu-
lated emission of radiation from GaAs p-n junctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 1,
pp. 62–64, Nov. 1 1962. (Received Oct. 6, 1962).
[6] T. M. Quist, R. H. Rediker, R. J. Keyes, W. E. Krag, B. Lax, A. L. McWhorter,
and H. J. Zeiger, “Semiconductor maser of GaAs,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 1,
pp. 91–92, Dec. 1 1962. (Received Oct. 23, 1962, in final form Nov. 5, 1962.).
[7] N. Holonyak and S. F. Bevacqua, “Coherent (visible) light emission from
Ga(As1−xPx junctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 1, pp. 82–83, Dec. 15 1962.
(Received Oct. 17, 1962).
[8] C. Kao and E. Hockham, “Dielectric-fibre surface waveguides for optical fre-
quencies,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 113, pp. 1151–1158, July 1966.
17
Chapter 1 18 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[9] J. Bray, “Optical fiber communication systems,” in The communications mir-
acle: The telecommunications pioneers from Morse to the Information Super-
highway, ch. 17, pp. 269–297, New York: Plenum Press, 1 ed., 1995.
[10] T. Miya, Y. Terenuma, T. Hosaka, and T. Miyashita, “Ultimate low-loss single-
mode fibre at 1.55µm,” Electron. Lett., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 106–108, February
1979.
[11] R. J. Mears, L. Reekie, S. B. Poole, and D. N. Payne, “Low-noise erbium-doped
fibre amplifier operating at 1.54µm,” Electron. Lett., vol. 23, pp. 1026–1028,
1987.
[12] J. Shurkin, “Eckert and Mauchly,” in Engines of the mind: The evolution of the
computer from mainframes to microprocessors (L. Sonne, ed.), ch. 5, pp. 117–
138, New York: Norton, 1 ed., 1996.
[13] M. Riordan and L. Hoddeson, “Dawn of an age,” in Crystal Fire: The invention
of the transistor and the birth of the information age (E. Barver, ed.), The sloan
technology series, ch. 1, pp. 1–10, New York: Norton, 1 ed., 1997.
[14] M. A. Hiltzik, “Did Xerox blow it?,” in Dealers of Lightning: Xerox Parc and
the Dawn of the Computer Age (L. C. Rowland, ed.), ch. Epilogue, pp. 389–398,
New York: Harper Business, 1 ed., 1999.
[15] K. Hafner and M. Lyon, “A rocket on our hands,” in Where wizards stay up
late: The origins of the Internet, ch. 8, pp. 219–256, New York: Touchstone,
1 ed., 1998.
[16] R. M. Metcalfe and D. R. Boggs, “Ethernet: distributed packet switching for
local computer networks,” Comm. ACM, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 395–404, July 1976.
[17] H. Frazier and H. Johnson, “Gigabit Ethernet: from 100 to 1,000 Mbps,” IEEE
Internet Computing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–31, January-February 1999.
[18] How fast is the Internet?, Nov. 1997. http://www.keynote.com/measures/howfast.html.
[19] S. Ortiz, “Hardware-based networking widens the pipes,” IEEE Computer,
vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 8–9, May 1998.
[20] A. Yu, “The future of microprocessors,” IEEE Micro, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 46–53,
December 1996.
Chapter 1 19 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[21] F. Baskett and J. L. Hennessy, “Microprocessors: From desktops to supercom-
puters,” Science, vol. 261, no. 5123, pp. 864–871, August 1993.
[22] C. E. Catlett, “In search of Gigabit applications,” IEEE Commun. Mag.,
vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 42–51, April 1992.
[23] D. Patterson, T. Anderson, N. Cardwell, R. Fromm, K. Keeton, C. Kozyrakis,
R. Thomas, and K. Yelick, “A case for intelligent RAM,” IEEE Micro, vol. 17,
no. 2, pp. 34–44, March/April 1997.
[24] J. Backus, “Can programming be liberated from the von Neumann style? a
functional style and its algebra of programs,” Comm. ACM, vol. 21, no. 8,
pp. 613–641, August 1978.
[25] J. R. Goodman, “Using cache memory to reduce processor memory traffic,”
Proc. 10th Annual Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, pp. 124–131, 1983.
[26] D. Elliott, Computational RAM: A memory-SIMD hybrid. PhD thesis, Depart-
ment of electrical and computer engineering, University of Toronto, August
1998.
[27] D. Burger, J. R. Goodman, and A. K¨agi, “Memory bandwidth limitations of fu-
ture microprocessors,” ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News (proceed-
ings of 23rd annual international symposium on Computer architecture (ISCA
’96)), vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 78–89, 22–24 May 1996.
[28] K. Diefendorff and P. K. Dubey, “How multimedia workloads will change pro-
cessor design,” IEEE Computer, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 43–45, September 1997.
[29] P. G. Emma, “Understanding some simple processor-performance limits,” IBM
Journal Res. Dev., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 215–232, 1997.
[30] W. A. Wulf and S. A. McKee, “Hitting the memory wall: Implications of the
obvious,” ACM Computer Architecture News, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 20–24, March
1995.
[31] A. Saulsbury, F. Pong, and A. Nowatzyk, “Missing the memory wall: The
case for processor/memory integration,” ACM SIGARCH Computer Architec-
ture News (proceedings of 23rd annual international symposium on Computer
architecture (ISCA96)), vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 90–101, May 1996.
Chapter 1 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[32] J. B. Brockman and P. M. Kogge, “The case for processing-in-memory,” Com-
puter Science Department Technical Report, no. CSE TR-9707, Jan 10 1990.
[33] D. A. Patterson. Private Communication, 1st December 1998.
[34] D. Culler, J. P. Singh, and A. Gupta, “Future directions,” in Parallel computer
architecture: A hardware/software approach, ch. 12, pp. 935–961, San Francisco:
Morgan Kaufmann, 1 ed., August 1998.
[35] T. E. Anderson, D. E. Culler, and D. A. Patterson, “A case for NOW (networks
of workstations),” IEEE Micro, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 54–64, February 1995.
[36] J. L. Hennessy and D. A. Patterson, “Interconnection networks,” in Computer
Architecture: A quantitative approach., ch. 7, San Franscisco, CA: Morgan-
Kaufmann, 2 ed., 1996. 562–632.
[37] N. J. Boden, D. Cohen, R. E. Feldermann, A. E. Kulawik, C. L. Seitz, J. N.
Seizovic, and W.-K. Su, “Myrinet: A gigabit-per-second local area network,”
IEEE Network, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–36, February 1995.
[38] L. Kleinrock, M. Gerla, N. Bambos, J. Cong, E. Gafni, L. Bergman, J. Bannis-
ter, S. P. Monacos, T. Bujewski, P.-C. Hu, B. Kannan, B. Kwan, E. Leonardi,
J. Peck, P. Palnati, and S. Walton, “The supercomputer supernet testbed:
A WDM-based supercomputer interconnect,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol.,
vol. 14, pp. 1388–1399, June 1996.
[39] D. Cotter, M. C. Tatham, J. K. Lucek, M. Shabeer, K. Smith, D. C. Rogers,
D. Nesset, and P. Gunning, “Photonic address-header recognition and self-
routing in ultrafast packet networks,” IEEE/OSA 1996 International Topical
Meeting on Photonics in Switching, 21–25 April 1996.
[40] A. Nowatzyk and P. R. Prucnal, “Are crossbars really dead? The case for opti-
cal multiprocessor interconnect systems,” ACM SIGARCH Computer Architec-
ture News (proceedings of 22nd annual international symposium on Computer
architecture (ISCA95)), no. 23, pp. 106–115, May 1995.
[41] D. A. B. Miller, “Physical reasons for optical interconnections,” Int. J. Opto-
electron., vol. 11, pp. 155–168, 1997.
[42] M. R. Feldman, S. C. Esener, C. C. Guest, and S. H. Lee, “Comparison between
optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations,”
Appl. Opt., vol. 27, pp. 1742–1751, 1988.
Chapter 1 21 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[43] J. D. Meindl, “Interconnection limits on 21st century gigascale integration,”
Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., vol. 514, no. 6, pp. 3–9, 1998.
[44] D. Z. Tzang, “Optical interconnections for digital systems,” IEEE AES Systems
Magazine, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 10–15, September 1992.
[45] D. Cotter, J. K. Lucek, and D. D. Marcenac, “Ultra-high bit-rate networking:
From the transcontinental backbone to the desktop,” IEEE Commun. Mag.,
vol. 35, pp. 90–95, April 1997.
[46] M. D. Bausman and V. Swanson, “Optical clock distribution system,” US
Patent, no. 5,537,498, Filed March 5, 1993; Assigned July 16, 1996.
[47] W. T. Cathey and B. J. Smith, “High concurrency data bus using arrays of
optical emitters and detectors,” Appl. Opt., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1687–1691,
15th May 1979.
[48] H. M. Ozaktas, “Fundamentals of optical interconnections—a review,” Proceed-
ings of the 4th international conference on Massively Parallel Processing using
optical interconnections, pp. 184–189, June 1997.
[49] A. Bar-Cohen, “Thermal management of air- and liquid- multichip modules,”
IEEE Trans. Components, Hybrids, Manuf Technol., vol. CHMT-10, no. 2,
pp. 159–175, June 1987.
[50] P. J. Delfyett, D. H. Hartman, and S. Zuber Ahmad, “Optical clock distribution
using a mode-locked semiconductor laser system,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol.,
vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1646–1649, December 1991.
[51] R. T. Chen, L. Wu, F. Li, S. Tang, M. Dubinovsky, J. Qi, J. C. Campbell,
R. Wickman, B. Picor, M. Hibbs-Brenner, J. Bristow, Y. S. Liu, S. Rattanc,
and C. Noddings, “Si CMOS process compatible guided-wave multi-GBit/sec
optical clock distribution system for Cray T-90 supercomputer,” Proc. 4th in-
ternational conference on Massively Paralell processing using optical intercon-
nections (MPPOI ‘97), pp. 10–24, June 1997.
[52] K. Kaede, T. Uji, T. Nagahori, T. Suzaka, T. Torikai, J. Hayashi, I. Watanabe,
M. Itoh, H. Honmou, and M. Shikada, “12-channel parallel optical-fiber trans-
mission using a low-drive current 1.3-µm LED array and a p-i-n PD array,”
IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. LT-8, no. 6, pp. 883–888, June 1990.
Chapter 1 22 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[53] K. H. Hahn, K. S. Giboney, J. Straznicky, and R. E. Wilson, “Gigabyte-per-
second optical interconnection modules for data communications,” Hewlett-
Packard Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, December 1997.
[54] M. L. Loeb and G. R. Stilwell, “High speed data transmission on an optical
fiber using a byte-wide WDM system,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. LT-6,
no. 8, pp. 1306–1311, August 1988.
[55] G. Jeong and J. W. Goodman, “Long-distance parallel data link using
WDM transmission with bit-skew compensation,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol.,
vol. LT-14, no. 5, pp. 655–660, May 1996.
[56] L. Bergman, J. Morookian, and C. Yeh, “An all-optical long-distance multi-
Gbytes/s bit parallel WDM single-fiber link,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol.,
vol. LT-16, no. 9, pp. 1577–1582, September 1998.
[57] L. A. Bergman, C. Yeh, and J. Morookian, “Towards the realization of multi-
km × Gbytes/sec bit-parallel WDM single fiber computer links,” Proc. 5th
International Conference on Massively Parallel Processing, vol. IEEE Comput.
Soc., pp. 218–223, June 1998.
[58] K. Tanaka, I. Morita, M. Suzuki, N. Edagawa, and S. Yamamoto, “400Gbit/s
(20×20) dense WDM soliton-based RZ transmission using dispersion flattened
fibre,” Electron. Lett., vol. 34, no. 23, pp. 2257–2258, November 1998.
[59] W. E. Leland, M. S. Taqqu, W. Willinger, and D. V. Wilson, “On the self-
similar nature of ethernet traffic (extended version),” IEEE/ACM Trans. Net-
working, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–15, February 1994.
[60] V. Paxson and S. Floyd, “Wide-area traffic: The failure of poissonian mod-
elling,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 226–244, June 1995.
[61] M. E. Crovella and A. Bestavros, “Self-similarity in world wide web traffic:
Evidence and possible causes,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 5, no. 6,
pp. 835–846, December 1997.
[62] W. Willinger and V. Paxson, “Where mathematics meets the Internet,” Notices
of the AMS, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 961–970, September 1998.
[63] D. A. Patterson and J. L. Hennessy, “Parallel processors,” in Computer organi-
zation and design: The hardware software interface, ch. 9, San Franscisco, CA:
Morgan-Kaufmann, 1 ed., 1994. 594–648.
Chapter 1 23 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[64] B. Mukherjee, “WDM-based local lightwave networks part I : Single-hop sys-
tems,” IEEE Network, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 12–27, May 1992.
[65] C. Partridge, Gigabit Networking. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley,
1st ed., 1994.
[66] M. S. Goodman, H. Kobrinski, V. Vecchi, R. M. Bulley, and J. L. Gimlett,
“The LAMBDANET multiwavelength network: Architecture, applications and
demonstrations,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 995–1004, Au-
gust 1990.
[67] N. R. Dono, P. E. Green, K. Liu, R. Ramaswami, and F. F. Tong, “A wavelength
division multiple access network for computer communication,” IEEE J. Sel.
Areas Comm., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 983–984, August 1990.
[68] L. P. Barry, R. F. O’Dowd, J. Debeau, and R. Boittin, “Tunable transform-
limited pulse generation using self-injection locking of an FP laser,” IEEE Pho-
ton. Technol. Lett., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1132–1134, October 1993.
[69] L. P. Barry, P. Guignard, J. Debeau, R. Boittin, and M. Bernard, “A high
speed broadcast and select TDMA network using all-optical demultiplexing,”
Proc. ECOC ’95, vol. 1, pp. 437–440, 1995.
[70] J. K. Lucek, P. Gunning, D. G. Moodie, K. Smith, and D. Pitcher, “Syn-
chrolan: A 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA LAN,” Electron Lett., vol. 33, no. 10,
pp. 887–888, 1997.
Chapter 2
Background material
Claude Shannon described a generalised model of a point-to-point telecommunica-
tions link [1] shown in Figure 2.1. A network is usually composed of many point-
Receiver
Signal Received
Signal
Information
Source Destination
Noise
Source
Message Message
Transmitter
Figure 2.1: Shannon’s generalised communication network.
to-point links since it is uneconomic to establish a dedicated, one-to-one connection
between every user and so rationalisation is desirable to share connections. This
introduces concepts such as multiplexing, routing and switching. These functions
are presently implemented with electronics however research is being undertaken
to implement them optically. The desire is to relegate electronic processing to the
periphery of a network and replacing it with simple, but fast, all-optical techniques
within the network to route and convey information across a room, building, city or
even between continents. The traditional telephone network is circuit switched—a
one-to-one physical path is established between source and destination whether or
not information is being conveyed. But this is now being replaced by packet-switched
24
Chapter 2 25 Background material
networks based predominantly on the IP protocol. Packet switched networks seg-
ment information into packets that can be aggregated using statistical multiplexing
over many point-to-point links.
Electronics still offers a cost-advantage over optics but it can be anticipated
that this advantage will erode and be supplanted by optics as the demand for high-
bandwidth transmission and switching increases. This trend is reflected in the es-
tablishment of certain bodies such as the optical internetworking forum which sees
router vendors like Cisco, Juniper and Avici sharing the floor with telecommunica-
tions companies like Nortel and Lucent. The Japanese OITDA1
recently produced
a roadmap [2] which outlined the likely evolution of optical networks. Amongst
its forecasts for the year 2010 were: A transmission rate of 100 Mbit/s will be re-
quired within the home; 5 Tbit/s will be required for backbone network systems;
100 Gbit/s for LANs; and 600 Gbit/s for computer backplanes. It is uncertain if
electronics provide this, yet optics certainly can.
2.1 Transmitter
2.1.1 Optical pulse sources
Semiconductor-based devices are the first choice as optical transmitters because they
are compact, consume little power, have no moving parts and are a mature and re-
liable technology. A useful historical review of Semiconductor Lasers is given by
Holonyak [3] in which he credits John Bardeen 2
and his invention of the transistor
as being the starting point. The first theoretical proposition of the use of semicon-
ductors as coherent light sources was derived by John Von Neumann in a note to
Edward Teller in 1953 [4, 5].
During the the autumn of 1962 several groups in the United States demonstrated
stimuated emission from homojunction GaAs [6, 7, 8] and Ga(As1−xPx) [9] material
systems. The devices were essentially forward-biased p-n junctions where above a
critical carrier population (threshold current) population inversion leading to excess
optical gain. A coherent oscillator resulted when a resonant cavity was formed by
cleaving along the natural lattice planes of the material structure. These devices
supported osciilations at several cavity modes each corresponding to a separate wave-
length. Many improvements to the structure of devices was made in the intervening
1
Optoelectronic Industry and Technology Development Association
2
the co-inverntor of the transistor and the only person to win the Nobel prize for Physics
twice—for the Transitor and the BCS theory of superconductivity.
Chapter 2 26 Background material
years. Most notable was the development of band-gap engineering [3, 10] which
exploited quantum-size effects. The quantum-well3
superlattices that resulted arti-
ficially modified the bulk properties of the materials and produced devices towards
longer wavelengths where optical fibre loss was much lower.
For high speed (≥ 10GHz) TDM-based photonic networks short duration optical
pulses (<10ps) are required at a single wavelength. Data can be imparted onto the
pulses by subsequent external modulation. For semiconductor materials the most
important characteristic of modulation is given by the relaxation frequency, fr. The
bigger, fr, the shorter the pulse duration possible. This is expressed in terms of
some of the fundamental properties of the laser in Equation 2.1 [11],
fr =
1
2π
AP0
τp
(2.1)
where, A, is the differential optical gain; P0, is the average photon density within
the laser cavity; and, τp, is the photon lifetime. There are several techniques of
short optical pulse generation in semiconductor structures. Lau [12] provides a
comprehensive and clear exposition of these techniques in semiconductor lasers, as
do White [13] and Mamyshev [14]. The main techniques are:
1. Mode-locking or phase locking whereby a mechanism within the laser cavity
causes longitudinal cavity modes to interact and become highly correlated.
This process forms a super-modal short optical pulse with a repetition rate
that is inversely proportional to the cavity length. The pulsewidth attainable,
∆τ, is given by Equation 2.2
∆τ =
1
(2M + 1)∆ν
(2.2)
where, ∆ν is the frequency separation between cavity modes; M, is the number
of cavity modes supported within the gain bandwidth of the device. Several
variants of mode-locking are possible. Anecdotally it produces the best pulses
amongst the other varients. However most implementations depend on an
external diffraction grating which can suffer from mechanical instabilities, as
the repetition rate is lowered so the the external cavity must be lengthened:
(a) Active mode-locking: is achieved by actively modulating the gain or loss
of the laser cavity at a frequency equal to the frequency spacing between
3
A quantum-well is formed if a thin slice of a low band gap material, such as InGaAs, is
sandwiched between two layers of a high bandgap material, AlGaAs/GaAs for example.
Chapter 2 27 Background material
longitudinal modes, so that each mode is driven by the modulational
sidebands of its neighbours. Section 3.5.3.4 of Chapter 3 provides an
example of such a device.
(b) Passive mode-locking: here the same effect is achieved using a passive
intra- or extra- cavity saturable absorber.
(c) Self-pulsating laser diodes: are comprised of two sections. One section,
the gain region, is strongly forward biased; whilst the other section, the
absorption region, is weakly forward biased. Under appropriate bias con-
ditions the amount of optical attenuation and feedback within the cavity
can produce a regular train of optical pulses.
(d) Colliding pulse mode-locking: if the saturable absorber region is placed
centrally within the laser cavity then two pulses can propagate simulta-
neously. The pulses collide in the central region and produce a train of
optical pulses at twice the repetition rate of conventionally mode-locked
lasers.
2. Gain-switching: in gain-switching an initial electrical current spike is termi-
nated, preventing a second optical relaxation oscillation from occuring, to
produce a single light pulse. Of course, if the current spike is repeated at
regular intervals a train of light pulses is generated. In a distributed feed-
back (DFB) laser where periodic perturbations within the gain region assured
single-mode operation. Chapter 3 will reveal some of the problems associated
with this device. For example they suffer undesirable effects such as timing
jitter and interpulse pedestal. Chapter 3 will outline some methods to reduce
these effects.
3. Q-switching: this involves increasing the loss of the laser cavity to suppress
lasing whilst simultaneously pumping the laser with carriers. Eventually when
a sizable gain-inversion is obtained the cavity loss is suddenly removed and a
short, intense Q-switched pulse emerges.
4. Electroabsorption modulation: This is an attractive technique particularly for
high speed (>10GHz) applications. It can be used to modulate the output
from a continuous wave (CW) source to produce a train of optical pulses.
The main drawback stems from the static insertion loss and the necessity of
discarding some of the power in the modulation process. Nevertheless it is a
very attractive technology. The use of electroabsorption modulators as pulse
Chapter 2 28 Background material
sources (Chapter 3) and de-multiplexers (Chapter 4) will be considered in this
thesis.
2.1.2 External modulation
The techniques described in the last subsection produce an optical pulse sequence
consisting entirely of ‘1’s at the base rate B. External modulation serves to gate
these optical pulses with a time-dependent electrical data signal for transmission
to a remote receiver. In direct detection systems the data is represented by the
presence or absence of light within a time-interval, 1/B.
The electrical field within an optical pulse can be expressed in terms of a time-
dependent vector, E(r, t) given by Equation 2.3 [15]
E(r, t) = E P exp[−ı(k · r − ωct − δ)] (2.3)
where, E is the peak electric field amplitude, P is the polarisation matrix vector, k
is the propagation vector, r is the range vector, ωc is the carrier angular frequency
(≈ 1014
Hz), δ is the carrier phase and t, as usual, represents time. Causality as
represented by the Kramers-Kronig relations [16] dictates that any change in the
imaginary refractive index, nimag, begets a change in the real refractive index, nreal
and vice versa4
. The linewidth-broadening (or linewidth-enhancement) factor, α, is
given by Equation 2.4 [17]
α ≡
∆nreal
∆nimag
(2.4)
where ∆nreal, is the change in the real refractive index inducing a phase change,
and ∆nimag is the change to the imaginary refractive index inducing an absorptive
change.
In an InGaAsP/InP electroabsorption modulator where α is small the application
of a reverse-bias electric field increases the absorption (decreases E in Equation 2.3.)
Consequently the application of a time-varying electrical signal, s(t), opens a time-
varying optical gate or window,
E (1 − mas(t)) P exp[−ı(k · r − ωct − δ)] (2.5)
where ma ≤ 1, is the amplitude modulation index of the device. In contrast, for
LiNBO3, where α is large, the application of an external electical data signal induces
4
Figures 1(a)–(c) of Toll [16] provide a crystal clear exposition and a very intuitive explanation
of the Kramers-Kronig relations based on the principle of classical causality—namely that an event
cannot precede its cause.
Chapter 2 29 Background material
a change to the refractive index of the material via the Pockels effect. This modulates
the optical path length inducing a phase change to the coherent optical field within
the material. This can be converted to an amplitude change when placed in one (or
both) arms of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer [19]. It can be represented thus
E P exp[−ı(k · r − ωct − δ − mδs(t)] (2.6)
where, mδ, is the phase modulation index of the material and is, ideally, an exact
multiple of π/2 in the balanced Mach-Zehnder geometry described in Chapter 4.
In many cases non-linear effects cause the quantitites in Equation 2.3 to inter-
act. For example, direct electrical modulation of a laser modulates both the the
amplitude and phase of the emitted optical field. The non-monotonic change of the
carrier frequecy is called chirping which leads to power penalties in transmission
systems [20]. Gain-switching which was mentioned in the previous subsection is a
particular variation of direct modulation (the data stream applied is, essentially, a
continuous sequence of ‘1’s.) The, α factor in this case provides a useful index for
the wavelength chirp of the device [17, 18].
2.1.3 Multiplexing
One method that can be used to increase the quantity of information carried between
a source and a remote destination is to increase the data capacity of the intervening
transmission medium. The most obvious technique is to install several more optical
fibres to carry additional, but separate time-division multiplexed systems shown in
Figure 2.1. However the cost of installing more optical fibre may be economically
prohibitive. So in many cases it is preferable to upgrade the transmission and
receiving equipment at both the source and destination of the system, especially
given that a single optical fibre has an estimated 40THz of bandwidth available
in the near-infrared wavelength region. Three techniques are possible: Upgrading
of the TDM link by increasing the transmitter and receiver bit-rates; Wavelength
Division Multiplexing (WDM); Optical Time Division Multiplexing (OTDM).
2.1.3.1 Time-division multiplexing
A typical TDM system is shown in Figure 2.2. Here the optical data rate transmitted
over the optical fibre, the line rate, is equivalent to the electrical signal rate or
base-rate. A high-speed electronic multiplexer (MUX) is required to electrically
combine the data from several information sources (ISn) before application to an
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections
40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections

More Related Content

What's hot

Power System Oscillations Detection Estimation & Control
Power System Oscillations Detection Estimation & ControlPower System Oscillations Detection Estimation & Control
Power System Oscillations Detection Estimation & ControlPower System Operation
 
Ali-Dissertation-5June2015
Ali-Dissertation-5June2015Ali-Dissertation-5June2015
Ali-Dissertation-5June2015Ali Farznahe Far
 
Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...
Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...
Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...David Sabater Dinter
 
02 whole
02 whole02 whole
02 wholevino205
 
Characterization Studies of a CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...
Characterization Studies of a  CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...Characterization Studies of a  CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...
Characterization Studies of a CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...Costa Papadatos
 
Lecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determination
Lecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determinationLecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determination
Lecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determinationErnst Schrama
 
U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31
U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31
U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31Karthik Uppu
 
Seismic Tomograhy for Concrete Investigation
Seismic Tomograhy for Concrete InvestigationSeismic Tomograhy for Concrete Investigation
Seismic Tomograhy for Concrete InvestigationAli Osman Öncel
 
aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11
aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11
aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11Aniket Pingley
 
Lecture notes on mobile communication
Lecture notes on mobile communicationLecture notes on mobile communication
Lecture notes on mobile communicationInocentshuja Ahmad
 

What's hot (18)

master thesis
master thesismaster thesis
master thesis
 
Power System Oscillations Detection Estimation & Control
Power System Oscillations Detection Estimation & ControlPower System Oscillations Detection Estimation & Control
Power System Oscillations Detection Estimation & Control
 
Master thesis
Master thesisMaster thesis
Master thesis
 
Ali-Dissertation-5June2015
Ali-Dissertation-5June2015Ali-Dissertation-5June2015
Ali-Dissertation-5June2015
 
Dissertation A. Sklavos
Dissertation A. SklavosDissertation A. Sklavos
Dissertation A. Sklavos
 
Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...
Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...
Parallel Interference Cancellation in beyond 3G multi-user and multi-antenna ...
 
02 whole
02 whole02 whole
02 whole
 
Characterization Studies of a CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...
Characterization Studies of a  CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...Characterization Studies of a  CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...
Characterization Studies of a CdTe Pixelated Timepix Detector for Applicatio...
 
PMT Handbook
PMT HandbookPMT Handbook
PMT Handbook
 
Lecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determination
Lecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determinationLecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determination
Lecture notes on planetary sciences and orbit determination
 
Free high-school-science-texts-physics
Free high-school-science-texts-physicsFree high-school-science-texts-physics
Free high-school-science-texts-physics
 
U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31
U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31
U Karthik_Updated Thesis_Jan_31
 
Seismic Tomograhy for Concrete Investigation
Seismic Tomograhy for Concrete InvestigationSeismic Tomograhy for Concrete Investigation
Seismic Tomograhy for Concrete Investigation
 
aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11
aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11
aniketpingley_dissertation_aug11
 
Dc
DcDc
Dc
 
Final Thesis Harsh Pandey
Final Thesis Harsh PandeyFinal Thesis Harsh Pandey
Final Thesis Harsh Pandey
 
Lecture notes on mobile communication
Lecture notes on mobile communicationLecture notes on mobile communication
Lecture notes on mobile communication
 
BenThesis
BenThesisBenThesis
BenThesis
 

Viewers also liked

Thesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging Markets
Thesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging MarketsThesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging Markets
Thesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging MarketsKasper Erbo Mortensen
 
The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...
The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...
The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...Joyce Saguti
 
Master Thesis
Master ThesisMaster Thesis
Master ThesisAli Fathi
 
Research Methodology
Research MethodologyResearch Methodology
Research MethodologyAneel Raza
 
4 p's in the Philippines
4 p's in the Philippines4 p's in the Philippines
4 p's in the Philippinesvlademire
 
Food processing and preservation full
Food processing and preservation fullFood processing and preservation full
Food processing and preservation fullRoyce G Chua
 
Food additives ppt
Food additives pptFood additives ppt
Food additives pptVan Phuong
 
Environmental protection & green growth
Environmental protection & green growthEnvironmental protection & green growth
Environmental protection & green growthChaudhary Khokhar
 
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTIONENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTIONHONEY
 
Master's Final Dissertation
Master's Final DissertationMaster's Final Dissertation
Master's Final DissertationClick Mark
 
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheHow to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheLeslie Samuel
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Thesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging Markets
Thesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging MarketsThesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging Markets
Thesis - Mobile Internet in Emerging Markets
 
The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...
The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...
The Effects of Marketing Mix (4ps) On Sales Performance of Telecommunication ...
 
Master Thesis
Master ThesisMaster Thesis
Master Thesis
 
Research Methodology
Research MethodologyResearch Methodology
Research Methodology
 
4 p's in the Philippines
4 p's in the Philippines4 p's in the Philippines
4 p's in the Philippines
 
Food processing and preservation full
Food processing and preservation fullFood processing and preservation full
Food processing and preservation full
 
Food additives ppt
Food additives pptFood additives ppt
Food additives ppt
 
Environmental protection & green growth
Environmental protection & green growthEnvironmental protection & green growth
Environmental protection & green growth
 
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTIONENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
 
Master's Final Dissertation
Master's Final DissertationMaster's Final Dissertation
Master's Final Dissertation
 
Final na final thesis
Final na final thesisFinal na final thesis
Final na final thesis
 
My thesis proposal
My thesis proposalMy thesis proposal
My thesis proposal
 
Thesis
ThesisThesis
Thesis
 
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your NicheHow to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
How to Become a Thought Leader in Your Niche
 

Similar to 40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections

Auralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck Sounds
Auralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck SoundsAuralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck Sounds
Auralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck SoundsWiktor Eriksson
 
MIMO-OFDM communication systems_ channel estimation and wireless.pdf
MIMO-OFDM communication systems_  channel estimation and wireless.pdfMIMO-OFDM communication systems_  channel estimation and wireless.pdf
MIMO-OFDM communication systems_ channel estimation and wireless.pdfSamerSamerM
 
Implementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkley
Implementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkleyImplementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkley
Implementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkleyFarhad Gholami
 
M1 - Photoconductive Emitters
M1 - Photoconductive EmittersM1 - Photoconductive Emitters
M1 - Photoconductive EmittersThanh-Quy Nguyen
 
Modeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_Buff
Modeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_BuffModeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_Buff
Modeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_BuffMiguel de Vega, Ph. D.
 
Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...
Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...
Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...Marco Zanola
 
Pulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera Photodetectors
Pulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera PhotodetectorsPulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera Photodetectors
Pulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera Photodetectorsnachod40
 
Antennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selection
Antennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selectionAntennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selection
Antennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selectionAndre Fourie
 
Microwave Engineering
Microwave EngineeringMicrowave Engineering
Microwave EngineeringSam Joey
 
Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709
Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709
Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709Willy Chang
 
Photometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source catalogue
Photometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source cataloguePhotometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source catalogue
Photometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source catalogueJack Nicholas
 
exfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdf
exfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdfexfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdf
exfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdfMohamedshabana38
 
Antenna study and design for ultra wideband communications apps
Antenna study and design for ultra wideband communications appsAntenna study and design for ultra wideband communications apps
Antenna study and design for ultra wideband communications appsvaldesc
 
1891121731 microstrip
1891121731 microstrip1891121731 microstrip
1891121731 microstriplhcnn
 
grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_
grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_
grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_Dirk Ekelschot
 
Multi-Band Rejection EMI Shielding
Multi-Band Rejection EMI ShieldingMulti-Band Rejection EMI Shielding
Multi-Band Rejection EMI ShieldingSourav Rakshit
 
Multi-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic Nuclei
Multi-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic NucleiMulti-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic Nuclei
Multi-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic NucleiSameer Patel
 

Similar to 40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections (20)

2006 liang
2006 liang2006 liang
2006 liang
 
Auralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck Sounds
Auralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck SoundsAuralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck Sounds
Auralization Methodology for External and Internal Truck Sounds
 
mchr dissertation2
mchr dissertation2mchr dissertation2
mchr dissertation2
 
MIMO-OFDM communication systems_ channel estimation and wireless.pdf
MIMO-OFDM communication systems_  channel estimation and wireless.pdfMIMO-OFDM communication systems_  channel estimation and wireless.pdf
MIMO-OFDM communication systems_ channel estimation and wireless.pdf
 
Implementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkley
Implementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkleyImplementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkley
Implementation of a Localization System for Sensor Networks-berkley
 
M1 - Photoconductive Emitters
M1 - Photoconductive EmittersM1 - Photoconductive Emitters
M1 - Photoconductive Emitters
 
Modeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_Buff
Modeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_BuffModeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_Buff
Modeling_Future_All_Optical_Networks_without_Buff
 
Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...
Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...
Tunable and narrow linewidth mm-wave generation through monolithically integr...
 
Pulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera Photodetectors
Pulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera PhotodetectorsPulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera Photodetectors
Pulse Preamplifiers for CTA Camera Photodetectors
 
Antennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selection
Antennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selectionAntennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selection
Antennas in practice - EM fundamentals and antenna selection
 
Microwave Engineering
Microwave EngineeringMicrowave Engineering
Microwave Engineering
 
Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709
Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709
Chang_gsas.harvard.inactive_0084L_11709
 
Photometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source catalogue
Photometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source cataloguePhotometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source catalogue
Photometry of the UWISH2 extended H2 source catalogue
 
Diplomarbeit
DiplomarbeitDiplomarbeit
Diplomarbeit
 
exfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdf
exfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdfexfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdf
exfo_book_guide-wdm_en.pdf
 
Antenna study and design for ultra wideband communications apps
Antenna study and design for ultra wideband communications appsAntenna study and design for ultra wideband communications apps
Antenna study and design for ultra wideband communications apps
 
1891121731 microstrip
1891121731 microstrip1891121731 microstrip
1891121731 microstrip
 
grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_
grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_
grDirkEkelschotFINAL__2_
 
Multi-Band Rejection EMI Shielding
Multi-Band Rejection EMI ShieldingMulti-Band Rejection EMI Shielding
Multi-Band Rejection EMI Shielding
 
Multi-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic Nuclei
Multi-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic NucleiMulti-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic Nuclei
Multi-Wavelength Analysis of Active Galactic Nuclei
 

40G Optical TDMA Network with 2.5G Connections

  • 1. Distributed Optical TDMA photonic switch fabric based on gain-switched distributed feedback semiconductor laser diodes and electroabsorption modulators by Paul Gunning A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Electronic Systems Engineering University of Essex Monday, January 15th 2001 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and the appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others.
  • 2. Abstract Emerging computer environments will require interconnects with low-latency, high data bandwidths, and fast reconfiguration to interconnect distributed computing, storage and networking elements. This thesis describes the work that culminated in the demonstration of a 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA LAN interconnect establishing 2.5Gbit/s interconnections with fast set-up between computer workstations using single-mode optical fibre. After some introductory material concerning the operation of optical transmis- sion systems, wavelength chirped pulses from a gain-switched (GS) distributed feed- back laser (DFB) semiconductor laser diode (SLD) are temporally compressed to 5ps with a specially tailored step-chirped in-fibre bragg grating are described. Further pulsewidth reduction obtained with non-linear fibre compression was investigated. These pulses are then used within a 100Gbit/s packet self-routing photonic network demonstrator. Electroabsorption (EA) modulators are introduced both for low- and high- repetition rate modulation of a continuous wave (CW) optical source. Other pulse source technologoes are considered including a fibre ring laser and mod- ulation of a CW optical beam using EA modulators. The inherent timing jitter intrinsic to the gain-switching process was reduced using coherent CW injection whilst the resulting enhancement of the interpulse pedestal was removed by an EA modulator acting as a synchronous temporal gate. EA modulator gating is then extended to channel selection for optical time-division de-multiplexing when driven with an electronic impulse generator synchronised to a network clock. An alterna- tive, all-optical, channel selection scheme which used an integrated Mach-Zehnder interferometer (IMZI) with the gating window produced directly from the optical clock pulse will be described. These methods are used within two versions of a 40Gbit/s Optical TDMA network one based on polarisation-maintaining fibre and containing the IMZI as a channel selection element. Another using the common blown fibre infrastructure within a building with EA modulator channel selectors. A star-topology, terabit/s interconnection fabric was outlined which included the use of wavelength-division multiplexing to increase the aggreated bandwidth. i
  • 3. Acknowledgements Kevin Smith magically set everyting in motion and his continuing guidance, support kindness and advice was invaluable. My day-to-day supervisor Julian Lucek was generous, considerate, and patient. Par- ticularly for sharing his intuitive feel for the practical aspects of fibre optical com- munication systems. His perception and insight was always timely and apposite. My academic supervisor, Shamim Siddiqui, I thank for his patience and guidance. I would like to express my gratitude to David Cotter who approved and supported the PhD by way of a University of Essex research contract through BT Project 106: Ultrafast Networking. BT (through Project 106,) the University of Essex and NATO also provided funding to travel to Italy, France, Scotland and New Mexico to attend and participate in scientific meetings that were invaluable as background to this thesis. Dan Pitcher provided invaluable practical support and advice in the laboratory. Keith Blow, Bob Manning, Alistair Poustie, and Paul Townsend were always helpful and generous in sharing their knowledge, experience and wisdom. It was a pleasure to work with, and learn from, Andrew Ellis on many occasions. In addition Andrew also reviewed the first version of this thesis and provided many excellent comments and suggestions. Many other people at BT proved invaluable during the course of this research for which I am extremely gratefull. These include: Dave Moodie, who provided all the EA modulators used in this work; Raman Kashyap who provided the fibre bragg gratings; Derek Nesset for sourcing and guidance with the IMZI; Doug Williams, who provided much of the research fibre. Colin Ford packaged (and repaired) many of the devices that were used (and abused.) Dominique Marcenac, John Collins, Tony Kelly, Russell Davey, Monica Rocha, Jennifer Massicott, David Smith, Daniel Pataca, Mohammed Shabeer, Paul Urquhart, Richard Wyatt and Terry Widdowson deserve special mention. ii
  • 4. Elke Jahn and Niraj Agrawal from HHI Berlin kindly supplied the Integrated Mach- Zehnder Interferometer used in this work. Vince Ruddy arranged my initial place- ment at BT Laboratories. Judy and Chris Chestnutt in Annesley, Great Bealings provided a quiet and stable environment in which to write the thesis down the years. Marlies Janssen and Andrew Ericsson were very kind and supportive. My friends from Ballyfermot: Steven Kavanagh, Declan Kelly and Martin Smyth. Some teachers including: Diarmuid O’ Donovan, Noel O’ Brien, and Oliver Murphy. The Zecca family were very supportive. Sweety-pie, Fatima, who showed me that when you look into the light, the light also looks into you. Um abracos e beijos e amor. Most importantly I was reared by my Aunt Nan and Aunt Kay. They indulged, cajoled and supported me unconditionally through thick and thin, darkness and light. This thesis is really a testament to their efforts and sacrifices. iii
  • 5. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Historical background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1.1 Information transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1.2 Information processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1.3 Local- and wide- area networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Emerging trends and Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2.1 Market drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2.2 Inter-chip: removal of the Von Neumann bottleneck . . . . . . 5 1.2.3 SAN: System Area Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.3 Electrical Problems and Optical Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3.1 Physical limits of Electrical interconnects . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3.2 Optical Interconnects emerge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.3.3 A practical demonstration: Optical Clock Distribution . . . . 10 1.4 Optical data distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.5 Shared-media Interconnects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.6 Thesis Outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2 Background material 24 2.1 Transmitter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.1.1 Optical pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2.1.2 External modulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.1.3 Multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.1.3.1 Time-division multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.1.3.2 Wavelength-division multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.1.3.3 Optical time-division multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2 Optical Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2.1 Single-mode optical fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.2.2 Optical fibre attenuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 iv
  • 6. 2.2.3 Optical fibre dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.2.3.1 Material Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.2.3.2 Waveguide Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 2.2.3.3 Dispersive propagation and wavelength chirp . . . . 40 2.2.3.4 Linearly chirped pulse compression analysis . . . . . 43 2.2.4 Birefringence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.2.5 Non-linear effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 2.2.5.1 Self-phase and cross-phase modulation . . . . . . . . 46 2.2.5.2 Solitons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2.2.6 Amplification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2.2.6.1 Noise and spontaneous emission . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2.2.6.2 Travelling wave semiconductor optical amplifiers . . 51 2.2.6.3 Erbium-doped fibre amplifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 2.3 Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 2.3.1 Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 2.3.1.1 Thermal and shot noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 2.3.1.2 Optical amplifier noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 2.3.2 Power penalty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 2.3.3 Demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 2.3.4 Clock Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 2.4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3 OTDM Pulse Sources 66 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.2 OTDM pulse source design constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.2.1 Multiplexer impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.2.2 Demultiplexer impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 3.2.2.1 Extinction ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 3.2.2.2 Timing jitter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3.3 Gain-Switched DFB (GS-DFB) pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 3.3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 3.3.2 Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 3.3.3 Optical pulse generation: Linear pulse compression . . . . . . 79 3.3.3.1 Dispersion compensating fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 3.3.3.2 Step-chirped fibre grating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 3.3.4 Optical pulse generation: Non-linear pulse compression . . . . 87 v
  • 7. 3.3.4.1 Constant dispersion fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 3.3.4.2 Dispersion decreasing fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 3.3.5 Timing Jitter impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 3.3.6 Timing Jitter measurement analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 3.4 Lithium Niobate data modulation and pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . 100 3.4.1 Lithium Niobate data modulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 3.4.2 Lithium Niobate optical pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 3.5 Electroabsorption modulator pulse sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 3.5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 3.5.2 Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 3.5.3 Optical pulse generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 3.5.3.1 Direct modulation via an impulse generator at 500MHz107 3.5.3.2 Single EA Modulator Direct driven by 2.5GHz sinu- soidal signal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 3.5.3.3 Serially concatenated EA Modulators (EAMs) driven by 1GHz impulse generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 3.5.3.4 Actively mode-locked 1GHz ring laser using an EA Modulator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 3.5.3.5 High repetition rate: 20GHz optical pulse generation 116 3.6 Hybrid (GS-DFB & EAM) pulse source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 3.6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 3.6.2 Optical pulse generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 3.6.2.1 Timing jitter reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 3.6.2.2 Pedestal suppression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 3.7 Summary and conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 4 OTDM channel selection 143 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 4.2 Electroabsorption modulator channel selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 4.2.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 4.2.1.1 Channel gating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 4.2.1.2 Critical issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 4.2.2 Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 4.2.2.1 Clock generation, data modulation and multiplexing 147 4.2.2.2 Clock recovery and channel gating . . . . . . . . . . 149 4.2.2.3 Specification of EA modulator . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 vi
  • 8. 4.2.2.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 4.2.2.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 4.3 Integrated Mach-Zehnder demultiplexer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 4.3.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 4.3.1.1 Interferometer fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 4.3.1.2 Switching speed and figures of merit . . . . . . . . . 153 4.3.1.3 Semiconductor optical amplifiers . . . . . . . . . . . 155 4.3.1.4 Heinrich-Hertz IMZI Device construction . . . . . . . 156 4.3.2 Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 4.3.2.1 Device operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 4.3.2.2 Switching window and gain recovery . . . . . . . . . 158 4.3.2.3 Channel selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 4.3.2.4 Device performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 4.3.2.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 4.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 5 Optical TDMA-based switching fabrics 169 5.1 Introduction and motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 5.2 Design considerations and constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 5.2.1 Switching speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 5.2.2 Redundancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 5.2.3 Topology and power budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 5.2.4 Synchronisation and data distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 5.2.5 Scalability and amplification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 5.3 SynchroLAN—all-optical channel selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 5.4 SynchroLAN—Twin fibre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179 5.5 PC Clusters and ECOLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 5.6 IP Networks and routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 5.7 A Terabit/s interconnection fabric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 5.7.1 Clock-comb generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 5.7.2 Data-comb generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 5.7.3 Formation and distribution of O-WTDMA frame . . . . . . . 187 5.7.4 Maintenance of optical path-length/synchronisation of inter- connect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 5.7.5 Demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189 5.8 Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 vii
  • 9. 5.8.1 Power distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 5.8.2 Timing jitter and wavelength-dependent temporal skew . . . . 191 5.8.3 Interchannel Crosstalk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 5.8.4 Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 5.9 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 6 Conclusions 203 6.1 Optical TDMA pulse source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 6.2 Optical TDMA demultiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 6.3 Optical TDMA-based switching fabrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 6.4 Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 A Maxwells equations 209 A Publications 212 A.1 Patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 A.2 Journal and Conference papers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 A.3 Book Chapters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 A.4 Textbook references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 B Selected Publications 219 viii
  • 10. List of Figures 1.1 Typical memory bandwidth hierarchy within a 100MHz computer. . . 6 1.2 Preferred interconnect technology: frequency-distance dependence. . . 9 1.3 Laser source for clock distribution to module boards within CrayT90 supercomputer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1.4 Photonic Switching fabric: T: Transmitter; R: Receiver. . . . . . . . . 14 2.1 Shannon’s generalised communication network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.2 Typical TDM system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.3 Typical WDM system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2.4 Typical OTDM system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.5 Bessel functions. (a) J0(ν) and (c) K0(ν) are physically realisable in a optical fibre and can be “stitched” together with appropriate boundary conditions to describe the fundamental mode of a sing;e- mode optical fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.6 Typical Attenuation vs. Wavelength response of a Germania-doped Silica optical fibre. (Data provided by D. L. Williams, BT Laborato- ries.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.7 Total dispersion of a Germania-doped Silica optical fibre: (a) Stan- dard fibre; (b) Dipersion shifted fibre. (source:http://www.corningfiber.com) 38 2.8 Gain versus wavelength for typical Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier . . 52 2.9 Generalised optoelectronic receiver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 2.10 Illustration of de-multiplexing: (a) WDM de-multiplexing; (b) OTDM de-multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 2.11 Pulse (a) RZ signal; (b) clock; (c) random, zero-mean component. . . 59 3.1 Multiplexing impairments of an OTDM system: (a) incoherent inter- ference between adjacent pulses; (b) solution shorter pulses. (Note the idealised square switching window.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 ix
  • 11. 3.2 SNR vs. pulsewidth dependence on extinction ratio. Variation of signal-to-noise ratio as a function of RZ pulsewidth for several pulse extinction ratios from 40dB-54dB. (A 15ps FWHM gaussian demul- tiplexing window with an extinction ratio of 100dB was used at the receiver.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3 Demultiplexing impairments: (a) Finite extinction ratio; (b) timing jitter of demultiplexing window. (Note: dashed line represents the de-multiplexing window.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 3.4 BER penalty versus demultiplexing switching window of a 40Gbit/s RZ system: (a) 19-27dB extinction ratio. (Note: XRs = “Extinction Ratios.”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 3.5 BER penalty versus demultiplexing switching window of a 40Gbit/s RZ system: (a) 29-39dB extinction ratio. (Note: XRs = ”Extinction Ratios.”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3.6 Jitter-induced errors. (a) successive time-multiplexed channels; (b) PDF of target channel, i, pulse arrival with respect to square switch- ing window; (c) PDFs of neighbour channel, i-1-th and i+1-th, pulse arrivals with respect to the square switching window. T: time slot width; W: switching window width; p: error-probability of i-th chan- nel arriving outside switching window; q: error-probability of i-1-th (or i+1-th) channel arriving outside switching window. . . . . . . . . 72 3.7 Impact of RMS timing jitter and demultiplexing switching window on BER performance of a 40Gbit/s RZ OTDM system. RMS timing jitter values:(a) 5ps; (b) 2.5ps; (c) 2.0ps; (d) 1.5ps; (e) 1.0ps; (f) 800fs; (g) 600fs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 3.8 400MHz electrical impulses from ‘500MHz’ Step-recovery diode/Impulse generator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 3.9 Experimental arrangement for gain-switching of a DFB SLD. (IG: Im- pulse generator; DCF: Dispersion Compensating Fibre; SCFG: Step- chirped fibre grating.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 3.10 (a) Autocorrelation of direct output from gain-switched DFB. (b) Spectral plot of direct output from gain-switched DFB. . . . . . . . . 81 3.11 (a) Autocorrelation after 300m Dispersion Compensating Fibre (DCF.) (b) Spectral plot after 300m DCF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 x
  • 12. 3.12 Step Chirped Fibre Grating (SCFG) of length L schematic. Com- prised of N sections of equal length, δl, with periods ranging from Λ1 to ΛN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 3.13 Transmission spectrum of Step Chirped Fibre Grating (SCFG) . . . . 85 3.14 (a) Autocorrelation after Step Chirped Fibre Grating (SCFG) com- pression; (b) corresponding spectral plot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 3.15 (a) Autocorrelation after SCFG compression and spectral filtering; (b) corresponding spectral plot (dashed curve corresponds to Fig- ure 3.14(b).) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 3.16 Experimental Arrangement of Non-linear compression stage. EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre amplifier; Er:Yb-DFA: Erbium:Ytterbium-doped fibre amplifier; NLF: Non-linear fibre; A/C: Autocorrelator; S/A: Spectrum Analyser. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 3.17 (a) autocorrelation @ 500MHz ;(b) spectrum @ 500MHz . . . . . . . 89 3.18 (a) autocorrelation @ 250 MHz;(b) spectrum @ 250MHz . . . . . . . 89 3.19 (a) Solitonic component (half-wave plate 0 degrees); (b) dispersive wave component (half-wave plate 70 degrees). Rep. rate 400MHz . . 90 3.20 (a) Planar silica word generator; (b) Packaged device. . . . . . . . . 93 3.21 (a) Autocorrelation of 1.6ps pulse after DDF fibre; (b) Cross-correlation of ’8-bit’ word. (Key: M, M : Marker bits; Ai(i = 1, 2, . . . , 6): Ad- dress bits.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 3.22 Word generation from ’active’ planar silica delay element. (a) Word 1;(b) Word 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 3.23 Tektronix Communication Signal Analyser trace of timing and ampli- tide jitter for a gain-switched DFB SLD. Note asymmetry in timing jitter histogram which indicates an RMS timing jitter of ∼5.97ps. (Horizontal scale 20ps/div, infinite persistence enabled.) . . . . . . . . 96 3.24 Illustration of turn-on event. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 3.25 RF spectra: Three main contributions: (1) δ functions represent the fourier transfrom of the pulse train; (2) the amplitude noise is rep- resented by the horizontal dashed line; and (3) the temporal jitter is represented by the quadratic, ω2 , term. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 3.26 Electrical impulse generation of 12 volts, 70ps FWHM, from a step recovery diode-voltage inverter combination at 500MHz. . . . . . . . . 102 xi
  • 13. 3.27 Application of electric field red-shifts absorption due to Quantum Confined Stark Effect (QCSE.) E: Applied electric field; λop: Oper- ational wavelength. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 3.28 Bound states in a Single Quantum Well (not to scale): (a) No electric field E = 0; (b) Electric field appliedE = 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 3.29 (a) Polarisation sensitivity and (b) insertion loss for TE and TM modes of a typical packaged discrete EA modulator. . . . . . . . . . . 106 3.30 Experimental arrangement for 500MHz EA modulator-based optical pulse source. Key: CW-DFB: EA modulator: EA modulator; EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre amplifier; Er:Yb-DFA: Erbium:Ytterbium-doped fibre amplifier; DCF: Dispersion compensating fibre; S/A: Spectrum analyser; A/C: Autocorrelator; SRD/INV: Step-recovery diode/voltage inverter combination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 3.31 Optical pulsewidth as a function of reverse bias applied to EA mod- ulator modulated by 500MHz electrical impulses. Key: +: No dis- persion compensation; ×: 300m of dispersion compensating fibre. (Dashed curves to guide eye.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 3.32 (a) Autocorrelation of output pulses at a reverse bias of 14 volts. dashed curve represents autocorrelation of uncompressed pulses for a reverse-bias of 10 volts. (b) Spectral plots of output pulses at a reverse-bias of 14 volts. Dashed curve represents autocorrelation of uncompressed pulses for a reverse bias of 10 volts. (Note: slight shift of wavelength, +0.13nm, is due to gradual heating of the CW laser as the experiment progressed.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 3.33 Experimental arrangement for single EA Modulator (EAM) driven by 2.5GHz sinusoidal signal. EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre amplifier. . . 110 3.34 EA Modulator harmonics at 2.5GHz: (a) 2.5GHz pulse train; (b) close-up of pulse showing 800fs RNS timing jitter.. . . . . . . . . . . . 110 3.35 EA Modulator harmonics at 2.5GHz: (a) pulsewidth (assumed gaus- sian) versus reverse-bias voltage; (b) autocorrelation of pulses for a reverse-bias of 10 volts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 3.36 Experimental arrangement for serially concatenated EA Modulators driven by a pair of 1GHz impulse generators. EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre amplifier. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 3.37 Dual in-line EA Modulators (a) autocorrelation; (b) spectrum for dual in-line autocorrelators drive by 1GHz SRDs. . . . . . . . . . . . 113 xii
  • 14. 3.38 Autocorrelation of dual in-line 1GHz SRDs with 6ps/nm compression fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 3.39 Experimental configuration of 1GHz MLL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 3.40 Mode-locked laser at 1 GHz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 3.41 Mode-locked ring laser @ 1GHz but with compression fibre. (b) the main problem is absence of closed-loop control to prevent the source losing lock and drifting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 3.42 Experimental Arrangement. PC: Polarisation Controller; D: Fibre Dispersion Parameter; DDF: Dispersion Decreasing Fibre; DCF: Dis- persion Compensating Fibre; EDFA: Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier; Yb:Er-DFA: Ytterbium: Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier. . . . . . . . . 117 3.43 Pulsewidth (assuming a hyperbolic secant squared pulse) as a func- tion of power launched into Dispersion Decreasing Fibre. (a) 10GHz; (b) 20GHz repetition rate. The arrow in (b) corresponds to auto- correlation and spectral plot in Figure 3.44. (Dashed spline curve to guide eye.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 3.44 (a) Autocorrelation and (b) corresponding spectral plot at 20 GHz repetition rate. Launched power to DDF: 19.4dBm. . . . . . . . . . . 119 3.45 Experimental setup. GS-DFB: gain-switched distributed feedback semiconductor laser diode; CW-ECL: continuous wave external cavity laser; PC: polarisation controller; EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre ampli- fier; DCF: dispersion compensating fibre.Note: ‘1,’ ‘2,’ ‘3’ and ‘4’ refer to the port number of the fused-fibre coupler. . . . . . . . . . . 121 3.46 High-speed sampling oscilloscope traces: (a) CW light injection off, (b) CW light injection on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 3.47 RF spectra: (a) CW light injection off, (b) CW light injection on (injected power was -8.4dBm, wavelength 1547.6nm, resolution band- width 1.33MHz, Video bandwidth 1KHz.) The dashed line in (a) & (b) is the noise floor of the instrument. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 3.48 Calculation of jitter: (a) plot used to calculate URTJ, CW off, (b) plot used to calculate URTJ, CW on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 3.49 Jitter dependence: (a) uncorrelated RMS jitter as a function of wave- length CW power -2dBm. Continuous line to guide eye, dashed line is the gain-switched profile without CW injection; (b) Uncorrelated root-mean-square (RMS) timing jitter as a function of CW injection power. (CW injection wavelength 1547.8nm.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 xiii
  • 15. 3.50 Autocorrelations with CW light injection: (a) EA modulator off; (b) EA Modulator on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 3.51 Cross-correlations of the gain-switched pulses—the implication of the improved extinction ratio. (a) CW off, EA modulator off; (b) CW on, EA Modulator off; and (c) CW on and EA modulator on. . . . . . 128 3.52 Filtering options: (a) Non-monotonic wavelength filtering; (b) Mono- tonic temporal filtering. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 3.53 Alternative configurations: (a) In-line configuration; (b) Impulse gen- erators further simplify set-up. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 3.54 Alternative in-line arrangement of components. . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 4.1 OTDM Demultiplexing: (a) OTDM Frame; (b) Gating function; (c) Demultiplexed channel, where ε is the on/off ratio of the gating de- vice, in this case an EA modulator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 4.2 Switching window autocorrelations as a function of electroabsorption modulator DC reverse-bias:(a) -3 volts; (b) -5 volts; (c) -7 volts. . . . 146 4.3 Demultiplexing: (a) Switching window; (b) Extinction ratio. . . . . . 147 4.4 Optical pulses: (a) autocorrelation and (b) spectrum. . . . . . . . . . 147 4.5 Interleaver operation. Eye diagram after LiNBO3 modulator: (a) no jitter suppression; (b) Jitter suppression. (c) and (d) eye diagrams of data channels in separate arms. (d) combined data channels; (f) all-four data channels at output of multiplexer. PC: Polarisation con- troller; PBS: Polarisation beamsplitter. ((a) & (b) 20GHz receiver; (c)—(f) 45GHz receiver, 50GHz sampling oscilloscope.) . . . . . . . . 148 4.6 Demultiplexing section: Experimental arrangement. Rx: 2.5GHz re- ceiver; BPF: 2.5GHz bandpass filter; PS: Microwave phase shifter; IG: Impulse Generator; INV: Voltage inverter; PS: Polarisation splitter; EDFA: Erbium-doped fibre amplifier; EA modulator Electroabsorp- tion modulator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 4.7 Response of Impulse generator/voltage inverter combination to re- covered 2.5GHz clock signal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 4.8 The four 215 -1 PRBS data channels recorded after the EA modulator. Output of EA modulator channel selector. (a) channel 1; (b) channel 2; (c) channel 3; and (d) channel 4. (50 GHz sampling oscilloscope with a 45 GHz photodiode.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 4.9 BER curves for channel 3. +: back-to-back; : selected channel. . . . 151 xiv
  • 16. 4.10 Mach-Zehnder interferometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 4.11 Typical HHI unpackaged IMZI device. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 4.12 Optical power as a function of current. Amp 1 200mA; Amp 2 varied. (Dashed spline curves to guide eye.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 4.13 Switching window of HHI IMZI: (a) Gain recovery; (b) switching window. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 4.14 Switching geometry of Integrated Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (IMZI) for holding beam experiments. (Isolator and circulator configurations are not shown.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 4.15 Gain recovery enhancement by holding beam (λ = 1544nm): (i) No holding beam; (ii) one holding beam; (iii) two holding beams. . . . . 159 4.16 Switching geometry of Integrated Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (IMZI) within READ section of SynchroLAN network node. Key: PBS: Polarisation Beam Splitter; EDFA: Erbium-doped Fibre Amplifier; MMI: Multimode Interference coupler; w/s: Computer Workstation. (Inset: Sampling oscilloscope traces of the six data channels received with 45 GHz PiN photodiode. The noise evident for channel 2 is due to the maladjusted phase of the data signal from the PPG.) . . . . . 160 4.17 Channel selection from 40Gbit/s data stream (50 GHz sampling os- cilloscope, 45 GHz p-i-n photodiode.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 4.18 Reflections: (i) Both SOA’s off; (ii) SOA 1 on; (iii) SOA 2 on; (iv) SOA 1 & SOA 2 on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 4.19 Indirect evidence of reflected clock leakage into data channels. For example (a) channel 1 switched-out, interference effect 100ps behind in Channel 4; (b) channel 2 switched-out, interference effect 100ps behind in Channel 5; (c) channel 3 switched-out, interference effect 100ps behind in Channel 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 5.1 Generic re-entrant bus: W: Write section; R: Read Section; αi: tap- ping ratio of i-th tap; βcr: coupler excess loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 5.2 SynchroLAN re-entrant bus: W: Write section; R: Read Section; αi: tapping ratio of i-th tap; βcr: coupler excess loss; βxs: aggregated excess loss of Write section of node . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 5.3 Required number of couplers between amplifier stages . . . . . . . . . 176 xv
  • 17. 5.4 Number of couplers, n−i, between amplifiers as a function of coupling ratio, α. Where Psat = +20dBm; Receiver sensitivity for a BER of 10−9 at 2.5Gbit/s ∼ −30dBm; Pmin ∼ −21dBm; Coupler excess loss, β = 0.5dB and the combined insertion loss, γ = 6dB . . . . . . . . . . 177 5.5 SynchroLAN demonstrator: Key: W: Write section of node, R: Read section of node; PBS: Polarisation Beam Splitter . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 5.6 SynchroLAN schematic. W: Write section of node; R: Read section of node; FFC: Fused-fibre coupler. Inset: ∼600fs timing jitter of pulses after 300m blown fibre. Clock pulse triggered oscilloscope, data pulse displayed. (45MHz pin diode, 50GHz sampling oscilloscope) . . . . . 180 5.7 Write (W) section of node. VOD: Variable Optical Delay; EAM: Electroabsorption modulator; FFC: Fused-fiber coupler. (Inset: Six data channels. 45MHz pin diode, 50GHz sampling oscilloscope.) . . . 181 5.8 Read (R) section of node. Rx: electronic receiver; EDFA: Erbium doped fibre amplifier; EAM: Electroabsorption modulator. (Inset IG: Impulse Generator; BPF: Bandpass Filter; MPS: Microwave Phase Shifter; PS: Phase Shifter.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 5.9 Channel selection from 40 Gbit/s data frame for: (a) node 1,(b) node 2 & (c) node 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 5.10 BER curves for each node. (a) Node 1: Dual-frequency drive; (b) Node 2: Single impulse generator drive; (c) Node 3: Dual impulse generator drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 5.11 SynchromoLAN schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 5.12 8 Node interconnect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 5.13 Hub-node schematic. Note: AWG omitted for clarity. W: WRITE; R: READ; PLL: Phase-locked loop; BPF: Band-pass filter; µPS: mi- crowave phase shifter; FS: Fibre Stretcher; IG: Impulse Generator. . . 188 5.14 Composition of 16×16 and 1×16 couplers: a) 4×4 coupler; b) Several 4 × 4 couplers are suitably connected to form a 16 × 16 coupler; (c) 1 × 16 coupler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 xvi
  • 18. 5.15 Schematic of the path taken by the N wavelengths assigned to one time slot through the interconnect. Key: AWG: Arrayed waveguide grating; EAM: Elactroabsorption modulators; FD: fibre delay. 1) At the AWG the wavelength channels are aligned within the time slot; 2) The EAMs are located at the termination of a fibre spoke and are subject to wavelength-dependent temporal skew; 3) the fibre delays after the EAMs are adjusted appropriately to ensure temporal alignment of the wavelength channels within the time slot at the N × N coupler; 4) the second traversal of the fibre spoke towards the WRITE section of the node induces wavelength-dependent temporal skew; 5) the fibre delays are used once again to re-align the channels prior to the EAM array. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 5.16 Power penalty arising from the finite rejection of adjacent wavelength channels for unamplified, 10 and 16 channel systems. . . . . . . . . . 195 xvii
  • 19. List of Tables 2.1 Classification and properties of normal and anomalously dispersive optical fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.1 Specification of dispersion decreasing fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 3.2 Sampling oscilloscope channel jitter measurements. . . . . . . . . . . 98 3.3 Classification and properties of the various pulse sources described in this chapter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 4.1 Non-linear optical properties and figure of merit of several material systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 5.1 Classification of switching speeds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 5.2 Optical fibre characteristics from ref. [8]. D, is the group delay disper- sion; λo, is the zero-dispersion wavelength; θ, is the temperature; So, is the dispersion slope. dλ/dθ|λ=λo , is the thermal coefficient term. NZ- DSF: non-zero dispersion shifted fibre, LCF: large-core fibre, DFF: dispersion-flattened fibre. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 xviii
  • 20. Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Historical background 1.1.1 Information transmission The digital communication age began when Samuel Morse invented both telegraphy and morse code1 in 1835 [1]. At that time a good morse operator could transmit 10 bit/s of information. Western Union commercialised telegraphy in 1844 and laid the first operational transatlantic telegraphic cable by 1866 [1]. Ten years later, on March 10 1876 to be precise [2], in the attic of a boarding house in Boston, Mas- sachusetts Alexander Graham Bell used twisted-pair copper wires to transmit the words, “Mr. Watson, come here. I want you [2, 3]” to his colleague in the adjoining room and so with the telephone laid the foundation of the present information age. At the beginning of the sixties T H Maiman at the Hughes Research Laboratory provided the first demonstration of a device that emitted coherent electromagnetic radiation—the ruby laser. Several competing groups [4, 5, 6, 7] announced coherent emission at 900nm from small, compact Gallium-Arsenide (GaAs) semiconductor laser diodes at 77K within weeks of one another. The spectral purity and low-spatial divergence of laser light held great promise for the transmission of information over free-space point-to-point links. However the transmission distance was limited by environmental conditions such as rain and fog. By 1966, Kao and Hockham [8] suggested that thin, glass optical fibres could provide a channel for transporting information using infrared light—including lasers, but only if the then huge material losses ∼1000dB/km could be reduced to ∼20dB/km. 1 On 31st December 1997 morse code was discontinued as the global means of conveying distress at sea! 1
  • 21. Chapter 1 2 Introduction In April 1970 one of the co-inventors of low-loss optical fibre, Donald Keck from Corning, wrote in his notebook of his measurement on a 1m sample of optical fi- bre: “Attenuation equals 16dB. Eureka! [9]” Later that year, at an IEE conference in London, Corning announced the fabrication of an optical fibre with a loss of ∼ 20dB/km at ∼900nm. So as the Seventies unfolded the possibility began to emerge of using a modulated laser source to transmit information within an optical fibre. By the latter half of the seventies this possibility became reality as several field trials of optical fibre systems were deployed. In the UK one of the first trials ran from BT Laboratories to Ipswich telephone exchange: 8 Mbit/s over 13km. In 1979 Miya and co-workers [10] reported the fabrication of a single-mode optical fibre with a loss of 0.2dB/km. The most significant advance in optical fibre transmission during the eighties concerned the demonstration of lasing and amplification in single-mode, Erbium-doped silica fibres, pumped by semiconductor lasers [11]. Fibre attenua- tion could now be compensated by in-fibre optical gain element. Wavelength- and time- division multiplexing technologies were then developed to increase the aggre- gate data rate that could be supported by a single optical fibre. By February 1998 this had advanced sufficiently for Lucent Technlogies to announce a commercial 400 Gbit/s WDM system called Wavestar TM . 1.1.2 Information processing In parallel with the developments in information transmission, remarkable advances have been made in computer technology. The first computing engine design, al- beit mechanical, is attributed to Charles Babbage and his Difference Engine in the 19th Century—although it wasn’t actually built until recently. The first electronic computer was demonstrated by Mauchley and Eckert in 1946 [12]. They called it the ENIAC and the logic gates were based on unreliable, bulky and power-hungry triode valves. A recurring theme during the evolution of computer technology is the reduction in physical size of the logic elements. Such an opportunity was pre- sented in 1947 when John Bardeen and Walter Brattain invented the transistor [13]. Two years later, Maurice Wilkes at Cambridge University demonstrated EDSAC, the world’s first general purpose stored-program computer. At about the same time that T H Maiman was demonstrating the first laser, Fairchild Semiconductor pro- duced the worlds first integrated circuit that comprised four transistors. By 1971 Intel had produced the first microprocessor, the 4004. The following year Chuck Thacker at Xerox PARC started to design what is now widely recognised as the first
  • 22. Chapter 1 3 Introduction personal computer—the Alto [14]. As that decade came to an end personal com- puters such as the Apple II were in some businesses and fewer homes. Then in 1981 the IBM PC was announced and it ushered in the era of a computer on every desk and within many homes. It has now evolved into cheap PC-based, multi-processor workstations. 1.1.3 Local- and wide- area networks The forerunner of the Internet—ARPANET—began with just four nodes on the west coast of the US in 1969. Interoperability was assured between the many different proprietary protocols by Cerf and Kahn with their development of the TCP/IP in- ternetworking protocol suite in 1974 [15]. In 1976 Xerox PARC introduced 3Mbit/s Ethernet [16] which has evolved into the worlds most ubiquitous Local Area Network (LAN) technology. The latest version—Gigabit Ethernet [17] is capable of switch- ing and routing at 1Gbit/s allowing full-duplex interconnections at wire speed. A 10Gbit/s version is near completion and 100Gbit/s Ethernet and even Terabit/s Ethernet are likely to follow. By 1983 the widespread adoption of TCP/IP allowed many other wide-area networks such as the NFSNET and MILNET to form a net- work that spanned the globe—the Internet [15]. The 1990s were notable for the emergence of the Internet particularly the world-wide web (WWW) and the ex- plosive growth of private intranets and extranets. The WWW has pervaded every aspect of the work and home environments. At the turn-of-the-millenium information is truly an economic force: the timely transmission and sharing of this information is now a valuable and exploitable commodity. But at its foundation is the abilty to generate and disseminate such information-rich content via fast processor chips, fast interconnects, and fast switch- ing systems. It is widely appreciated (and endured) that WWW is an acronym for “world wide wait” studies have concluded that the effective bandwidth available to Internet users is a mere 40Kbit/s [18]! To this end in an attempt to increase bandwidth and reduce latency new protocol stacks that place IP directly on top of an optical layer and render the SONET/SDH layer2 superfluous are emerging. Moreover network technology that was traditionally implemented in software is now being performed with faster, dedicated hardware with an attendent reduction in latency [19]. 2 At the time of writing Cisco systems can provide 2.5Gbit/s optical interface cards running their Dynamic Packet Transport technology which is an implemetation of ‘IP over Optics.’
  • 23. Chapter 1 4 Introduction 1.2 Emerging trends and Limitations 1.2.1 Market drivers Advances in computing technology for example rapidly increasing processor clock speeds [20], allied with the push towards multi-processor computer platforms3 re- quire ever-faster interconnection networks for high speed communication both within and between computing machines or networking devices at various length scales that span several hierarchies of interconnect: • Intra-chip—Optics has a minimal impact because of the small dimensions typ- ical on this scale which allow huge interconnect densities [21] Dimension on the order of µm • Inter-chip—of the order of mm’s • MCM-to-MCM—Multichip module to multichip module cm’s • PCB-to-PCB—Printed circuit board to printed circuit board distances up to • Backplane to backplane over distances greater than say 20cm. Reconfiguration likely • Rack-to-rack—several metres • System Area Networks—1m-to-1km Desirable attributes for all these hierarchies include low latency, high bandwidth and fast reconfiguration of the interconnection fabric. The applications at the so-called ‘bleeding-edge’ that drive these advances include [22]: • Cryptography • Nuclear weapons design • Atmospheric dynamics simulations • Fly-by-wire aircraft • Synthethic aperture radar • Molecular dynamics/Pharamaceuticals 3 At time of writing (March 1999) the Cray T3E-1200 can contain up to 2048, 600MHz processors providing a peak performance of 2.5Teraflops.
  • 24. Chapter 1 5 Introduction • Oil exploration • Synthethic theatres of war. • Distributed interactive collaborative environments 1.2.2 Inter-chip: removal of the Von Neumann bottleneck The application of advanced lithographic techniques that reduce the feature size on processor and memory chips permit a ×4 increase in the number of transistors per die every three years in-line with Moore’s law. There is no sign that this trend is likely to stop. But whilst the clock speed of processors is increasing by 60% annu- ally, memory speed is increasing at a mere 10% over the same interval [23]. This is important because the Von Neumann architecture, that is predominant today and which emerged during the forties, separates the processing unit from the memory unit via an interconnect [24]. Consequently various trade-offs are carefully weighed to amorotise the mismatch in latency and bandwidth between the processor and memory. The use of a hierarchy of on- and off-chip caches [25] is one particular example. But it relies on software compliers that make the best use of the caches through temporal and spatial data locality in the processors references to mem- ory [21]. Figure 1.1 graphically illustrates the bandwidth hierarchy of the memory system (32 MBytes of 16Mbit DRAM) within an admittedly dated 100MHz com- puter [26]. Most striking is that the bandwidth available within the memory is some 3000 times larger than that provided by the I/O pins—the bottleneck is mostly due to the pins [27]. The most telling feature is how bandwidth is progressively squan- dered as hierarchies of elements are crossed within the chip. The net effect is to increase latency leaving the processor idle for several clock cycles. Moreover mod- ern computer designs include advanced graphic engines for multimedia rendering that compete with the processor for a share of the memory bandwidth which makes matters worse still [28]. Taken together the memory latency, reduced bandwidth and the faster clock speed serve to conspire against processor efficiency and represent a large and growing gap between the processor and memory variously termed the “von Neumann bottleneck” [29] or “memory wall” [30, 31]. However since it is now possible to include additional features and, by implica- tion, functionality upon a single die a persuasive argument has emerged which con- tends that if you cannot bring the memory bandwidth to the processor then why not bring the processor to the memory? This idea for processor-memory integration has various names: Computational RAM (CRAM) [26]; Intelligent RAM (IRAM) [23];
  • 25. Chapter 1 6 Introduction 1TB/s100GB/s10GB/s1GB/s100MB/s (c) Duncan Elliott 1998, used with permission Figure 1.1: Typical memory bandwidth hierarchy within a 100MHz computer. processor-in-memory (PIM) [32]. When implemented it has been conservatively es- timated that the latency would be reduced by ×10, whilst the bandwidth available between the memory and the processor would increase ×100 [23]. An additional benefit that would accrue is that interactions between the PIM and off-chip inter- connect would be reduced ×100 [33]. In addition a portion of the PIM chip could be dedicated to re-configurable logic cells so that tailored functionality could be incorporated after fabrication perhaps dynamically in-situ [32, 34] with attendent benefits of scale and cost reductions. Once PIM chips become a commercial reality then multi-PIM computers or networking elements that communicate to neighbour- ing elements within a cabinet or across a network will emerge. This would shift the bandwidth and latency bottlenecks onto the interconnection fabric that exists ”outside-the-box” and so low-latency, high bandwidth interconnections to service this need will be at a premium. 1.2.3 SAN: System Area Networks Working in the opposite direction it is now widely recognised that many of these applications can be implemented more cost-effectively using low-cost, networks of workstations (NOW) [35]. Scalability is possible by just adding more workstations.
  • 26. Chapter 1 7 Introduction Commodity computer clusters are challenging conventional supercomputers in terms of processing power but for a fraction of the cost. Beowulf from IBM is one working example that uses conventional LAN technology to interconnect commodity PCs via standard interface cards connected to the PCI bus4 . That said the type of problems that can be addressed require a high ratio of computation-to-communication because of the high latency overhead of conventional LAN technologies and access via the PCI bus. Consequently problems or applica- tions that require a low ratio of computation-to-communication are less successful. To address this deficiency an emerging trend has been to scale-up high-performance electronic interconnects typical of supercomputers to local-area network (LAN) di- mensions. These so-called system area networks (SANs) span distances ranging from 1m-1km—falls between that within a supercomputer cabinet and that of a LAN [36, 23]. The most commercially successful SAN, to date, is produced by Myricom net- works. The Myricom approach is centred on an 8-port electronic crossbar-based hub. Each one of up to 8 hosts is attached to the hub by an electrical cable containing 18 separate twisted pairs (9 in each direction) that allows parallel bi-directional data transfer of 9-bit words over distances of up to 25m at 1.28Gbit/s (160MByte/s) [37]. Specialised cards interface to the the memory bus within each workstation. The su- percomputer supernet testbed (SST) envisages internetworking between Myrinet switches to form a wide area network (WAN) that could interconnect supercom- puters throughout the west coast of the US [38]. If the Myrinet approach is a scaling-up of traditional electronic supercomputer fabric. An alternative approach is to scale-down both developed and emerging technologies in optical networking which have not been considered applicable over short distances (<1km) [39, 40]. The next section will argue why this alternative approach is now needed. 1.3 Electrical Problems and Optical Solutions 1.3.1 Physical limits of Electrical interconnects Present-day computers rely on metallic interconnects for chip-chip interconnections. However the bandwidth that they can provide is now coming up against hard phys- ical limits. The main constraints include the increase in signal attenuation with 4 17 IBM netfinity servers containing 36 Pentium chips and running the Linux operating system have equalled the performanace of a $5.5Million Cray T3T-900-AC64 in rendering a ray tracing, image rendering a ray tracing program. The IBM Beowulf cluster cost only $150,000!
  • 27. Chapter 1 8 Introduction propagation length at frequencies above 1GHz due to the skin-effect resistance of the metallic track and the nature of the dielectric substrate. A metric has been proposed based on the aspect ratio–the ratio of propagation length to cross-sectional area–of cu-based interconnects [41]. This maintains that for a given length, an interconnect comprising many, small cross-section wires running at low data rates is equivalent to a few, large cross-section wires running at high data rates. Traditionally the problem of providing high bandwidth was addressed by the former approach—spatially multiplexing a flat array of adjacent, parallel metallic tracks at low signalling frequencies. But as computer clock rates increase so the adverse effect of capacitative coupling between adjacent tracks leads to enhanced crosstalk with a consequent loss of data integrity. Data skew between tracks requires additional de-skewing circuitry and requires careful spatial routing of tracks within the machine. Consequently there has been a gradual shift away from multiple, narrow parallel tracks running at 100MHz towards a single serial track operating at 1+ GHz. The benefits that follow from this approach include the greatly reduced skew of a single track over several parallel tracks and the relaxation of track routing constraints. However as clock frequencies increase above 1GHz, the physical limitations inher- ent in a metallic interconnection network become apparent. Figure 1.2 [42] illustrates this in graphic form. In effect, each point-to-point link acts as an antenna that serves as both a source and a sink of time-varying, radio frequency (RF) noise en- ergy commonly called electromagnetic interference (EMI.) For example, RF noise energy transmitted to, and received from, the surroundings can affect the decision at receiver modules and induce phantom data events that cause incoherence between memory registers. In addition, the fan-out and radiation-induced energy losses need to be compensated by amplifiers to ensure an adequate signal-to-noise ratio at the termination points of the system. But the introduction of amplifiers increases noise and adds to the thermal load and power consumption of the system. Moreover, thermal variations of the resistance cause variations in the signal phase that require additional control elements. Nevertheless a pristine, untapped and properly termi- nated single track with specialised dielectric substrate has been demonstrated to 9.6Gb/s over 0.5m. But this must be qualified by noting that improperly termi- nated signal taps along the span of the interconnect would adversely impact signal quality due to reflections from impedance mismatches. Optical Interconnects can provide a solution to this problem.
  • 28. Chapter 1 9 Introduction 10 10 10 10 10 10 13 12 11 9 8 10 10 10 7 6 frequency,Hz distance, m Transmission Line Optics Wire 1010 -2 -1 1 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 -3 Figure 1.2: Preferred interconnect technology: frequency-distance dependence. 1.3.2 Optical Interconnects emerge It is easy to appreciate how interconnects have now become the dominant factor in determining both the productivity and performance of computer technology [43]. Consequently data transfer rates within and between computing machines are sub- ject to performance bottlenecks that expose the bandwidth limitations of electrical interconnects and offer a compelling case for optical interconnects. Amongst the compelling advantages of an opticall interconnect are [44]: • High distance-bandwidth product: through much lower attenuation and greatly reduced frequency dependent effects requiring fewer amplifiers. • EMI immunity providing excellent isolation between data channels. • High packing density through reduced weight and volume allow greater free- dom to the system architect. • Greatly enhanced bandwidth per track through the use of wave-, time-, or spatial multiplexing can be used to extend the total bandwidth of the fibre
  • 29. Chapter 1 10 Introduction and not be hampered by the limited operational frequency of end-components: Transmitter modulation and receiver demodulation. It is this last point that is central to the use of optical fibre, namely the three bandwidth-enhanced degrees of freedom: spatial, spectral and temporal that can be provided by optical fibre. For example a number of optical fibres can be assembled into a spatial multiplex. In turn the wide spectral bandwidth available within each individual fibre can be utilised for wavelength multiplexing of several distinct data channels. Each wavelength channel can, in turn, be time-multiplexed in the optical domain into further independently modulated channels. A suitable combination of spatial-, wavelength and time-multiplexing can form a very high capacity interconnect albeit limited by the constraints particular to each degree of freedom i.e. chromatic dispersion in OTDM system or crosstalk in a WDM system [?]. For example a range of 16 applied to each dimension gives an aggregated capacity of over 40Tbit/s (= Modulating frequency of 10GHz x 16 fibres x 16 wavelength channels x 16 time channels.) Of course suitable multiplexing transmitters and de-multiplexing receivers are required at the access-points of the system. But the main constraint to the use of optical interconnects has been down to economics. Traditionally fibre optic component costs, when compared to their cop- per brethren, were very much more expensive. Whilst silica optical fibre is cost comparable to copper, the higher cost of end equipment such as transmitters and receivers has rendered it viable for all but low-volume, high-margin telecommuni- cation systems and supercomuters. However this is changing due to the economies of scale that flow from the mass-production of advanced optical sources such as distributed feedback (DFB) lasers and high-bandwidth optoelectronic receivers for deployment in local and wide-area network technologies such as Gigabit Ethernet and SONET/SDH. Consequently the distance over which optical interconnects com- bined with advanced switching techniques are becoming economically attractive has been shrinking continuously [45]. 1.3.3 A practical demonstration: Optical Clock Distribu- tion Computing machines that contain two or more processors present the software en- gineer with a concurrent programming environment that considerably lightens the programming task. This concurrency is ultimately derived from a central clock
  • 30. Chapter 1 11 Introduction source based on a quartz crystal oscillator that generates a global timing reference. The timing reference is fanned-out and electrically propagated across an interconnec- tion network comprised of many copper- (or aluminium-) based point-to-point links that terminate on the spatially dispersed timing modules located on every printed circuit board, each of which contains one or several processors. The timing module provides a local timing reference from which the event transitions for the hardware registers originate. Consequently all local atomic data transition events that occur within the hardware registers of the processors can be traced to a common source and hence can be treated as being globally synchronous. The excess time per clock cycle that remains after each register transition is referred to as the clock margin. Insufficient clock margin can cause a register to load or store data either before it has become valid or after it is no longer valid. Both are manifest as data incoherence between the dispersed registers which if left unchecked can lead to errors. The clock margin, then, serves to mitigate this effect by providing timing slack for all global event transitions to occur and settle. But as machines become physically larger the timing skew arising from the differences in propagation delay between the dispersed point-to-point links increases and requires careful design to manage the clock tolerances. These tolerances are now set to become even tighter as the clock frequency of processors exceeds the 1GHz (sub 1ns) barrier. Moreover the proportion of timing jitter as a fraction of the clock cycle period becomes more pronounced and places tight constraints on the design of interconnections between modules. For these reasons designers of advanced multiprocessor computing machines have turned their attention towards optical interconnections for clock distribution [46]. Early attempts used free-space optics and weren’t practical propositions because of the alignment tolerances and mechanical stability as well as clear line-of-sight optical paths [47] that were required. In this context the benefits of optical fibre are many. Optical fibre provides a noise-free clock conduit that neither generates or is affected by RF interference. Its broad bandwidth (tens of THz) can support high clock transmission rates per optical fibre strand. Silica based optical fibre, in particular, has extremely low-attenuation and occupies 1/50th the area of a copper equivalent. It is not constrained by line-of-sight and is mechanically stable A less well-appreciated advantage of optical interconnects is related to the grow- ing problem of thermal management and heat dissipation within a modern computer system [48]. At the microscopic level the increased density of gates on each proces- sor die adds to the heat flux of the system and this must be serviced at all levels
  • 31. Chapter 1 12 Introduction right up to the cabinet level. Modern multiprocessor systems must remove of the order 10kW/cm2 of thermal flux. To put this into perspective a thermal flux of 100W/cm2 would be typical one mile from the blast centre of a 1 megaton nuclear device [49]. At the very least this requires additional cooling elements to remove the excess generated. To reduce this effect it is necessary to move the processing elements further apart, in effect trading latency against thermal load. But if the processing elements are moved apart then the data rate must be reduced because of the physical limitations such as crosstalk and frequency dependent attenuation of the Cu-based interconnects that have been outlined earlier. Somewhat less appreciated is the real-estate constraints that compel manufac- turers to keep the footprint and overall volume of a system tightly constrained in line with standardised racking systems. The small cross-sectional area coupled with its physical flexibility allows optical fibre to make full use of the 3rd dimension to thread its way through the restricted passages and the confined spaces found within these machines. The low expansion coefficient and refractive index variation are particularly compelling reasons for choosing optical fibre. The fast rising edge of an optical clock distribution system can provide a precise decision point to initi- ate switching. In fact the viability of the optical approach for clock distribution has been experimentally demonstrated in the laboratory [50] and found sufficiently compelling for deployment within a commercial supercomputer system [46]. The latter is shown in Figure 1.3 where Cray have implemented a laser clock distribu- tion system for their T90 supercomputer. More recently, Cray have described a Source: Carol Kleinfield, Cray Research Figure 1.3: Laser source for clock distribution to module boards within CrayT90 supercomputer.
  • 32. Chapter 1 13 Introduction more advanced, yet potentially lower-cost, version of the clock distribution optics based on low-cost polyimide waveguides [51]. 1.4 Optical data distribution The next logical step is to extend the use of optics from clock distribution to data distribution within multi-processor computing systems. Architecturally, clock dis- tribution is a fanned-out, unidirectional broadcast with a static configuration. In contrast a data interconnect needs to support bi-directional operation between the connected nodes. A facility for dynamic reconfiguration that allows any node to exchange data with any other node is also required. The bandwidth requirements are substantially higher than for clock distribution and this mandates some form of multiplexing. Early attempts at increasing the transmission capacity with optoelectonics used spatial divivion multiplexing techniques (SDM) utilising multiple fibre ribbon cables. For example Kaede et al. [52] demonstrated 12×14 Megabit/s in 1990. Since then research has focussed on low-cost, high-volume versions comprising data-modulated vertical cavity, surface emitting laser (VCSEL) array transmitters and metal-semiconductor- metal (MSM) receiver arrays with the interconnection fabric provided by polyimide ribbon cable. A commercially mature implementation of this technology was devel- oped during the POLO-2 initiative providing for two contradirectional 10×1Gbit/s interconnections with an aggregated bandwidth of 20Gbit/s [53]. Yet one single-mode fibre can provide isolation of several independently modu- lated channels via wavelength division multiplexing. The data transmitted at each separate wavelength is independent of its neighbours so in effect it forms a virtual rib- bon cable [54]. All wavelengths are subject to identical environmental effects but do suffer from deterministic wavelength-dependent data skew. However over extended distances recent suggestions [55] utilise adaptive electronic bit-skew compensation and demonstrations [56, 57] have underlined the potential of this approach. 1.5 Shared-media Interconnects A generic switching fabric is shown in Figure 1.4. Every node contains a transmit- ter (T) and a receiver (R) to interconvert data between the optical domain within the fabric and the electrical domain within the attached workstations. In a pho- tonic packet switching network the route followed by optical packets between the
  • 33. Chapter 1 14 Introduction node1 nodeN R T R T R T R T node3 node2 Photonic Switching Fabric Figure 1.4: Photonic Switching fabric: T: Transmitter; R: Receiver. source and destination nodes might not be explicitly prescribed. Instead reliance is placed upon statistical multiplexing which assumes that the bursty nature of the traffic originating from the nodes after aggregation within the fabric is averaged and smoothed-out with time. However recent measurements on real networks contradicts this assumption: traffic aggregation within a network tends to be self-similar on all time scales and across different length scales from LANs [59] to WANS [60, 61, 62]. Should the aggregated demand for bandwidth exceed that which the fabric can sup- port then buffering must be provided lest packets be discarded. But buffering can introduce variable packet latency and out-of-order delivery. Both are undesirable for real-time multimedia applications such as video. It would be more useful to establish dedicated connections between nodes across the photonic fabric and where each connection provides bandwidth in excess of that generated by, or acceptable to, a node. Now when a connection is established bandwidth is guaranteed and buffering is unnecessary thus allowing sustained data transfer without the latency that arises from packet segmentation/reassembly and buffering—the path between source and destination nodes is explicitly prescribed and the latency is deterministically defined. However to establish a connection the underlying network topology becomes critical. It can take several geometric forms including Bus, Star, Ring, Tree, Mesh, Cubes, Hypercubes [36, 63]. Ideally the chosen topology should allow connections to be established on-demand and independently of other traffic within the photonic fabric i.e. be non-blocking. A shared medium interconnection fabric can allow several nodes to interconnect
  • 34. Chapter 1 15 Introduction independently and concurrently through a sequential assignment of time (or wave- length) slots, one per node. Data from the write section of a node is time- (or wavelength-) multiplexed onto the shared optical fibre. The use of tunable time slot selectors (or wavelength filters) at the receive section of each node allows the channel of interest to be chosen for reception. The selector must have temporal (or wavelength) agility to allow synchronisation (in the case of a TDMA network,) or wavelength stability (within a WDMA network.) Shared medium interconnects have been usefully classified as [64, 65] 1. Fixed-Transmitter(s), Fixed-Receiver(s) (FT-FR) 2. Tunable-Transmitter(s), Fixed-Receiver(s) (TT-FR) 3. Fixed-Transmitter(s), Tunable-Receiver(s) (FT-TR) 4. Tunable-Transmitter(s), Tunable-Receiver(s) (TT-TR) The latter two, FT-TR and TT-TR, provide a broadcast and select network where the transmission from one node can be received by one, many or all other node(s). The TT-TR approach, though, suffers from an inablilty to broadcast efficiently as well as the possibility of blocking. To date most research into single-hop, shared-medium networks has been fo- cussed on WDM implementations. Examples would include LAMBDANET [66] from Bellcore which used a FT-FR configuration. Two versions were demonstrated: 18 wavelengths × 1.5 Gbit/s and 16 wavelengths × 2 Gbit/s. At the receive section of a node the aggregated wavelength channels were spatially separated with each allocated a separate receiver. The channel of interest was selected electronically. Rainbow from IBM [67] was a FT-TR network with a broadcast star topology sup- porting 32 workstations @ 200Mbit/s per wavelength channel. Signaling to effect channel allocation was distributed to all nodes using a dedicated wavelength channel that required an additional FT-FR pair within each node. In contrast, there have been few demonstrations of TDM based interconnects. This is sightly surprising since clock distribution and recovery is a common requirement of all systems. Barry et al [68, 69] demonstrated a FT-TR, star-based, implementation that used a non- linear optical loop mirror (NOLM) for channel gating in a lone receiver. The lack of additional independent receivers limited the functionality to broadcast-only—bi- directional transmission was not possible. Bi-directionality is necessary to properly demonstrate a network. In this thesis the steps that led to the construction of such a system will be reported.
  • 35. Chapter 1 16 Introduction 1.6 Thesis Outline This thesis describes the key ideas and components that were used to construct a 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA interconection fabric which was used to interconnect high-specification Unix workstations. The thesis will deliberately constrain itself to the “optical plumbing” of this single-stage (single-hop) distributed switching fab- ric. Chapter 2 which follows will develop the technical background that underpins the thesis as well as outlining some of the common ideas within modern optical communications systems. Chapter 3 will describe the various optical pulse source technologies that were considered for the transmitter and will justify why one—based on a combination of a gain-switched DFB laser diode and an electroabsorption mod- ulation was chosen. Chapter 4 describes two separate demultiplexing techniques one based on traditional optoelectronic clock recovery that utilised an electroabsorption modulator, the other based on all-optical clock recovery that used an integrated Mach-Zehnder inteferometer. Chapter 5 will describe how the work of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 was synthesised and extended to construct a 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA interconnection fabric that used the common optical fibre infrastructure within a building. It will also outline an enhancement that uses wavelength-division multi- plexing to increase the aggregate bandwidth. The work will be reviewed and an attempt made to put it into context in Chapter ??. A list of patents, publications and references generated during the course of the work described in the thesis will be given in Appendix A. Finally Appendix B includes a copy of the patent that arose from some of the work described in Chapter 3 as well as a small selection of the peer-reviewed publications that were generated.
  • 36. Bibliography [1] J. Bray, “The first telegraph and cable engineers,” in The communications miracle: The telecommunications pioneers from Morse to the Information Su- perhighway, ch. 3, pp. 35–47, New York: Plenum Press, 1 ed., 1995. [2] R. Rapaport, “What does a Nobel prize for radio astronomy have to do with your telephone?,” Wired Magazine, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 124–134, April 1995. [3] J. Bray, “The first telephone engineers,” in The communications miracle: The telecommunications pioneers from Morse to the Information Superhighway, ch. 4, pp. 49–59, New York: Plenum Press, 1 ed., 1995. [4] R. N. Hall, G. E. Fenner, J. D. Kingsley, T. J. Soltys, and R. O. Carlson, “Coher- ent light emission from GaAs junctions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 9, pp. 366–368, Nov. 1 1962. (Received Sept. 24, 1962). [5] M. I. Nathan, W. P. Dumke, G. Burns, F. H. Dill, and G. Lasher, “Stimu- lated emission of radiation from GaAs p-n junctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 1, pp. 62–64, Nov. 1 1962. (Received Oct. 6, 1962). [6] T. M. Quist, R. H. Rediker, R. J. Keyes, W. E. Krag, B. Lax, A. L. McWhorter, and H. J. Zeiger, “Semiconductor maser of GaAs,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 1, pp. 91–92, Dec. 1 1962. (Received Oct. 23, 1962, in final form Nov. 5, 1962.). [7] N. Holonyak and S. F. Bevacqua, “Coherent (visible) light emission from Ga(As1−xPx junctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 1, pp. 82–83, Dec. 15 1962. (Received Oct. 17, 1962). [8] C. Kao and E. Hockham, “Dielectric-fibre surface waveguides for optical fre- quencies,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 113, pp. 1151–1158, July 1966. 17
  • 37. Chapter 1 18 BIBLIOGRAPHY [9] J. Bray, “Optical fiber communication systems,” in The communications mir- acle: The telecommunications pioneers from Morse to the Information Super- highway, ch. 17, pp. 269–297, New York: Plenum Press, 1 ed., 1995. [10] T. Miya, Y. Terenuma, T. Hosaka, and T. Miyashita, “Ultimate low-loss single- mode fibre at 1.55µm,” Electron. Lett., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 106–108, February 1979. [11] R. J. Mears, L. Reekie, S. B. Poole, and D. N. Payne, “Low-noise erbium-doped fibre amplifier operating at 1.54µm,” Electron. Lett., vol. 23, pp. 1026–1028, 1987. [12] J. Shurkin, “Eckert and Mauchly,” in Engines of the mind: The evolution of the computer from mainframes to microprocessors (L. Sonne, ed.), ch. 5, pp. 117– 138, New York: Norton, 1 ed., 1996. [13] M. Riordan and L. Hoddeson, “Dawn of an age,” in Crystal Fire: The invention of the transistor and the birth of the information age (E. Barver, ed.), The sloan technology series, ch. 1, pp. 1–10, New York: Norton, 1 ed., 1997. [14] M. A. Hiltzik, “Did Xerox blow it?,” in Dealers of Lightning: Xerox Parc and the Dawn of the Computer Age (L. C. Rowland, ed.), ch. Epilogue, pp. 389–398, New York: Harper Business, 1 ed., 1999. [15] K. Hafner and M. Lyon, “A rocket on our hands,” in Where wizards stay up late: The origins of the Internet, ch. 8, pp. 219–256, New York: Touchstone, 1 ed., 1998. [16] R. M. Metcalfe and D. R. Boggs, “Ethernet: distributed packet switching for local computer networks,” Comm. ACM, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 395–404, July 1976. [17] H. Frazier and H. Johnson, “Gigabit Ethernet: from 100 to 1,000 Mbps,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–31, January-February 1999. [18] How fast is the Internet?, Nov. 1997. http://www.keynote.com/measures/howfast.html. [19] S. Ortiz, “Hardware-based networking widens the pipes,” IEEE Computer, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 8–9, May 1998. [20] A. Yu, “The future of microprocessors,” IEEE Micro, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 46–53, December 1996.
  • 38. Chapter 1 19 BIBLIOGRAPHY [21] F. Baskett and J. L. Hennessy, “Microprocessors: From desktops to supercom- puters,” Science, vol. 261, no. 5123, pp. 864–871, August 1993. [22] C. E. Catlett, “In search of Gigabit applications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 42–51, April 1992. [23] D. Patterson, T. Anderson, N. Cardwell, R. Fromm, K. Keeton, C. Kozyrakis, R. Thomas, and K. Yelick, “A case for intelligent RAM,” IEEE Micro, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 34–44, March/April 1997. [24] J. Backus, “Can programming be liberated from the von Neumann style? a functional style and its algebra of programs,” Comm. ACM, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 613–641, August 1978. [25] J. R. Goodman, “Using cache memory to reduce processor memory traffic,” Proc. 10th Annual Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, pp. 124–131, 1983. [26] D. Elliott, Computational RAM: A memory-SIMD hybrid. PhD thesis, Depart- ment of electrical and computer engineering, University of Toronto, August 1998. [27] D. Burger, J. R. Goodman, and A. K¨agi, “Memory bandwidth limitations of fu- ture microprocessors,” ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News (proceed- ings of 23rd annual international symposium on Computer architecture (ISCA ’96)), vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 78–89, 22–24 May 1996. [28] K. Diefendorff and P. K. Dubey, “How multimedia workloads will change pro- cessor design,” IEEE Computer, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 43–45, September 1997. [29] P. G. Emma, “Understanding some simple processor-performance limits,” IBM Journal Res. Dev., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 215–232, 1997. [30] W. A. Wulf and S. A. McKee, “Hitting the memory wall: Implications of the obvious,” ACM Computer Architecture News, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 20–24, March 1995. [31] A. Saulsbury, F. Pong, and A. Nowatzyk, “Missing the memory wall: The case for processor/memory integration,” ACM SIGARCH Computer Architec- ture News (proceedings of 23rd annual international symposium on Computer architecture (ISCA96)), vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 90–101, May 1996.
  • 39. Chapter 1 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY [32] J. B. Brockman and P. M. Kogge, “The case for processing-in-memory,” Com- puter Science Department Technical Report, no. CSE TR-9707, Jan 10 1990. [33] D. A. Patterson. Private Communication, 1st December 1998. [34] D. Culler, J. P. Singh, and A. Gupta, “Future directions,” in Parallel computer architecture: A hardware/software approach, ch. 12, pp. 935–961, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1 ed., August 1998. [35] T. E. Anderson, D. E. Culler, and D. A. Patterson, “A case for NOW (networks of workstations),” IEEE Micro, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 54–64, February 1995. [36] J. L. Hennessy and D. A. Patterson, “Interconnection networks,” in Computer Architecture: A quantitative approach., ch. 7, San Franscisco, CA: Morgan- Kaufmann, 2 ed., 1996. 562–632. [37] N. J. Boden, D. Cohen, R. E. Feldermann, A. E. Kulawik, C. L. Seitz, J. N. Seizovic, and W.-K. Su, “Myrinet: A gigabit-per-second local area network,” IEEE Network, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–36, February 1995. [38] L. Kleinrock, M. Gerla, N. Bambos, J. Cong, E. Gafni, L. Bergman, J. Bannis- ter, S. P. Monacos, T. Bujewski, P.-C. Hu, B. Kannan, B. Kwan, E. Leonardi, J. Peck, P. Palnati, and S. Walton, “The supercomputer supernet testbed: A WDM-based supercomputer interconnect,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 14, pp. 1388–1399, June 1996. [39] D. Cotter, M. C. Tatham, J. K. Lucek, M. Shabeer, K. Smith, D. C. Rogers, D. Nesset, and P. Gunning, “Photonic address-header recognition and self- routing in ultrafast packet networks,” IEEE/OSA 1996 International Topical Meeting on Photonics in Switching, 21–25 April 1996. [40] A. Nowatzyk and P. R. Prucnal, “Are crossbars really dead? The case for opti- cal multiprocessor interconnect systems,” ACM SIGARCH Computer Architec- ture News (proceedings of 22nd annual international symposium on Computer architecture (ISCA95)), no. 23, pp. 106–115, May 1995. [41] D. A. B. Miller, “Physical reasons for optical interconnections,” Int. J. Opto- electron., vol. 11, pp. 155–168, 1997. [42] M. R. Feldman, S. C. Esener, C. C. Guest, and S. H. Lee, “Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations,” Appl. Opt., vol. 27, pp. 1742–1751, 1988.
  • 40. Chapter 1 21 BIBLIOGRAPHY [43] J. D. Meindl, “Interconnection limits on 21st century gigascale integration,” Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., vol. 514, no. 6, pp. 3–9, 1998. [44] D. Z. Tzang, “Optical interconnections for digital systems,” IEEE AES Systems Magazine, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 10–15, September 1992. [45] D. Cotter, J. K. Lucek, and D. D. Marcenac, “Ultra-high bit-rate networking: From the transcontinental backbone to the desktop,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 35, pp. 90–95, April 1997. [46] M. D. Bausman and V. Swanson, “Optical clock distribution system,” US Patent, no. 5,537,498, Filed March 5, 1993; Assigned July 16, 1996. [47] W. T. Cathey and B. J. Smith, “High concurrency data bus using arrays of optical emitters and detectors,” Appl. Opt., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1687–1691, 15th May 1979. [48] H. M. Ozaktas, “Fundamentals of optical interconnections—a review,” Proceed- ings of the 4th international conference on Massively Parallel Processing using optical interconnections, pp. 184–189, June 1997. [49] A. Bar-Cohen, “Thermal management of air- and liquid- multichip modules,” IEEE Trans. Components, Hybrids, Manuf Technol., vol. CHMT-10, no. 2, pp. 159–175, June 1987. [50] P. J. Delfyett, D. H. Hartman, and S. Zuber Ahmad, “Optical clock distribution using a mode-locked semiconductor laser system,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1646–1649, December 1991. [51] R. T. Chen, L. Wu, F. Li, S. Tang, M. Dubinovsky, J. Qi, J. C. Campbell, R. Wickman, B. Picor, M. Hibbs-Brenner, J. Bristow, Y. S. Liu, S. Rattanc, and C. Noddings, “Si CMOS process compatible guided-wave multi-GBit/sec optical clock distribution system for Cray T-90 supercomputer,” Proc. 4th in- ternational conference on Massively Paralell processing using optical intercon- nections (MPPOI ‘97), pp. 10–24, June 1997. [52] K. Kaede, T. Uji, T. Nagahori, T. Suzaka, T. Torikai, J. Hayashi, I. Watanabe, M. Itoh, H. Honmou, and M. Shikada, “12-channel parallel optical-fiber trans- mission using a low-drive current 1.3-µm LED array and a p-i-n PD array,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. LT-8, no. 6, pp. 883–888, June 1990.
  • 41. Chapter 1 22 BIBLIOGRAPHY [53] K. H. Hahn, K. S. Giboney, J. Straznicky, and R. E. Wilson, “Gigabyte-per- second optical interconnection modules for data communications,” Hewlett- Packard Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, December 1997. [54] M. L. Loeb and G. R. Stilwell, “High speed data transmission on an optical fiber using a byte-wide WDM system,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. LT-6, no. 8, pp. 1306–1311, August 1988. [55] G. Jeong and J. W. Goodman, “Long-distance parallel data link using WDM transmission with bit-skew compensation,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. LT-14, no. 5, pp. 655–660, May 1996. [56] L. Bergman, J. Morookian, and C. Yeh, “An all-optical long-distance multi- Gbytes/s bit parallel WDM single-fiber link,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. LT-16, no. 9, pp. 1577–1582, September 1998. [57] L. A. Bergman, C. Yeh, and J. Morookian, “Towards the realization of multi- km × Gbytes/sec bit-parallel WDM single fiber computer links,” Proc. 5th International Conference on Massively Parallel Processing, vol. IEEE Comput. Soc., pp. 218–223, June 1998. [58] K. Tanaka, I. Morita, M. Suzuki, N. Edagawa, and S. Yamamoto, “400Gbit/s (20×20) dense WDM soliton-based RZ transmission using dispersion flattened fibre,” Electron. Lett., vol. 34, no. 23, pp. 2257–2258, November 1998. [59] W. E. Leland, M. S. Taqqu, W. Willinger, and D. V. Wilson, “On the self- similar nature of ethernet traffic (extended version),” IEEE/ACM Trans. Net- working, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–15, February 1994. [60] V. Paxson and S. Floyd, “Wide-area traffic: The failure of poissonian mod- elling,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 226–244, June 1995. [61] M. E. Crovella and A. Bestavros, “Self-similarity in world wide web traffic: Evidence and possible causes,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 835–846, December 1997. [62] W. Willinger and V. Paxson, “Where mathematics meets the Internet,” Notices of the AMS, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 961–970, September 1998. [63] D. A. Patterson and J. L. Hennessy, “Parallel processors,” in Computer organi- zation and design: The hardware software interface, ch. 9, San Franscisco, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann, 1 ed., 1994. 594–648.
  • 42. Chapter 1 23 BIBLIOGRAPHY [64] B. Mukherjee, “WDM-based local lightwave networks part I : Single-hop sys- tems,” IEEE Network, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 12–27, May 1992. [65] C. Partridge, Gigabit Networking. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1st ed., 1994. [66] M. S. Goodman, H. Kobrinski, V. Vecchi, R. M. Bulley, and J. L. Gimlett, “The LAMBDANET multiwavelength network: Architecture, applications and demonstrations,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 995–1004, Au- gust 1990. [67] N. R. Dono, P. E. Green, K. Liu, R. Ramaswami, and F. F. Tong, “A wavelength division multiple access network for computer communication,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 983–984, August 1990. [68] L. P. Barry, R. F. O’Dowd, J. Debeau, and R. Boittin, “Tunable transform- limited pulse generation using self-injection locking of an FP laser,” IEEE Pho- ton. Technol. Lett., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1132–1134, October 1993. [69] L. P. Barry, P. Guignard, J. Debeau, R. Boittin, and M. Bernard, “A high speed broadcast and select TDMA network using all-optical demultiplexing,” Proc. ECOC ’95, vol. 1, pp. 437–440, 1995. [70] J. K. Lucek, P. Gunning, D. G. Moodie, K. Smith, and D. Pitcher, “Syn- chrolan: A 40Gbit/s optical-TDMA LAN,” Electron Lett., vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 887–888, 1997.
  • 43. Chapter 2 Background material Claude Shannon described a generalised model of a point-to-point telecommunica- tions link [1] shown in Figure 2.1. A network is usually composed of many point- Receiver Signal Received Signal Information Source Destination Noise Source Message Message Transmitter Figure 2.1: Shannon’s generalised communication network. to-point links since it is uneconomic to establish a dedicated, one-to-one connection between every user and so rationalisation is desirable to share connections. This introduces concepts such as multiplexing, routing and switching. These functions are presently implemented with electronics however research is being undertaken to implement them optically. The desire is to relegate electronic processing to the periphery of a network and replacing it with simple, but fast, all-optical techniques within the network to route and convey information across a room, building, city or even between continents. The traditional telephone network is circuit switched—a one-to-one physical path is established between source and destination whether or not information is being conveyed. But this is now being replaced by packet-switched 24
  • 44. Chapter 2 25 Background material networks based predominantly on the IP protocol. Packet switched networks seg- ment information into packets that can be aggregated using statistical multiplexing over many point-to-point links. Electronics still offers a cost-advantage over optics but it can be anticipated that this advantage will erode and be supplanted by optics as the demand for high- bandwidth transmission and switching increases. This trend is reflected in the es- tablishment of certain bodies such as the optical internetworking forum which sees router vendors like Cisco, Juniper and Avici sharing the floor with telecommunica- tions companies like Nortel and Lucent. The Japanese OITDA1 recently produced a roadmap [2] which outlined the likely evolution of optical networks. Amongst its forecasts for the year 2010 were: A transmission rate of 100 Mbit/s will be re- quired within the home; 5 Tbit/s will be required for backbone network systems; 100 Gbit/s for LANs; and 600 Gbit/s for computer backplanes. It is uncertain if electronics provide this, yet optics certainly can. 2.1 Transmitter 2.1.1 Optical pulse sources Semiconductor-based devices are the first choice as optical transmitters because they are compact, consume little power, have no moving parts and are a mature and re- liable technology. A useful historical review of Semiconductor Lasers is given by Holonyak [3] in which he credits John Bardeen 2 and his invention of the transistor as being the starting point. The first theoretical proposition of the use of semicon- ductors as coherent light sources was derived by John Von Neumann in a note to Edward Teller in 1953 [4, 5]. During the the autumn of 1962 several groups in the United States demonstrated stimuated emission from homojunction GaAs [6, 7, 8] and Ga(As1−xPx) [9] material systems. The devices were essentially forward-biased p-n junctions where above a critical carrier population (threshold current) population inversion leading to excess optical gain. A coherent oscillator resulted when a resonant cavity was formed by cleaving along the natural lattice planes of the material structure. These devices supported osciilations at several cavity modes each corresponding to a separate wave- length. Many improvements to the structure of devices was made in the intervening 1 Optoelectronic Industry and Technology Development Association 2 the co-inverntor of the transistor and the only person to win the Nobel prize for Physics twice—for the Transitor and the BCS theory of superconductivity.
  • 45. Chapter 2 26 Background material years. Most notable was the development of band-gap engineering [3, 10] which exploited quantum-size effects. The quantum-well3 superlattices that resulted arti- ficially modified the bulk properties of the materials and produced devices towards longer wavelengths where optical fibre loss was much lower. For high speed (≥ 10GHz) TDM-based photonic networks short duration optical pulses (<10ps) are required at a single wavelength. Data can be imparted onto the pulses by subsequent external modulation. For semiconductor materials the most important characteristic of modulation is given by the relaxation frequency, fr. The bigger, fr, the shorter the pulse duration possible. This is expressed in terms of some of the fundamental properties of the laser in Equation 2.1 [11], fr = 1 2π AP0 τp (2.1) where, A, is the differential optical gain; P0, is the average photon density within the laser cavity; and, τp, is the photon lifetime. There are several techniques of short optical pulse generation in semiconductor structures. Lau [12] provides a comprehensive and clear exposition of these techniques in semiconductor lasers, as do White [13] and Mamyshev [14]. The main techniques are: 1. Mode-locking or phase locking whereby a mechanism within the laser cavity causes longitudinal cavity modes to interact and become highly correlated. This process forms a super-modal short optical pulse with a repetition rate that is inversely proportional to the cavity length. The pulsewidth attainable, ∆τ, is given by Equation 2.2 ∆τ = 1 (2M + 1)∆ν (2.2) where, ∆ν is the frequency separation between cavity modes; M, is the number of cavity modes supported within the gain bandwidth of the device. Several variants of mode-locking are possible. Anecdotally it produces the best pulses amongst the other varients. However most implementations depend on an external diffraction grating which can suffer from mechanical instabilities, as the repetition rate is lowered so the the external cavity must be lengthened: (a) Active mode-locking: is achieved by actively modulating the gain or loss of the laser cavity at a frequency equal to the frequency spacing between 3 A quantum-well is formed if a thin slice of a low band gap material, such as InGaAs, is sandwiched between two layers of a high bandgap material, AlGaAs/GaAs for example.
  • 46. Chapter 2 27 Background material longitudinal modes, so that each mode is driven by the modulational sidebands of its neighbours. Section 3.5.3.4 of Chapter 3 provides an example of such a device. (b) Passive mode-locking: here the same effect is achieved using a passive intra- or extra- cavity saturable absorber. (c) Self-pulsating laser diodes: are comprised of two sections. One section, the gain region, is strongly forward biased; whilst the other section, the absorption region, is weakly forward biased. Under appropriate bias con- ditions the amount of optical attenuation and feedback within the cavity can produce a regular train of optical pulses. (d) Colliding pulse mode-locking: if the saturable absorber region is placed centrally within the laser cavity then two pulses can propagate simulta- neously. The pulses collide in the central region and produce a train of optical pulses at twice the repetition rate of conventionally mode-locked lasers. 2. Gain-switching: in gain-switching an initial electrical current spike is termi- nated, preventing a second optical relaxation oscillation from occuring, to produce a single light pulse. Of course, if the current spike is repeated at regular intervals a train of light pulses is generated. In a distributed feed- back (DFB) laser where periodic perturbations within the gain region assured single-mode operation. Chapter 3 will reveal some of the problems associated with this device. For example they suffer undesirable effects such as timing jitter and interpulse pedestal. Chapter 3 will outline some methods to reduce these effects. 3. Q-switching: this involves increasing the loss of the laser cavity to suppress lasing whilst simultaneously pumping the laser with carriers. Eventually when a sizable gain-inversion is obtained the cavity loss is suddenly removed and a short, intense Q-switched pulse emerges. 4. Electroabsorption modulation: This is an attractive technique particularly for high speed (>10GHz) applications. It can be used to modulate the output from a continuous wave (CW) source to produce a train of optical pulses. The main drawback stems from the static insertion loss and the necessity of discarding some of the power in the modulation process. Nevertheless it is a very attractive technology. The use of electroabsorption modulators as pulse
  • 47. Chapter 2 28 Background material sources (Chapter 3) and de-multiplexers (Chapter 4) will be considered in this thesis. 2.1.2 External modulation The techniques described in the last subsection produce an optical pulse sequence consisting entirely of ‘1’s at the base rate B. External modulation serves to gate these optical pulses with a time-dependent electrical data signal for transmission to a remote receiver. In direct detection systems the data is represented by the presence or absence of light within a time-interval, 1/B. The electrical field within an optical pulse can be expressed in terms of a time- dependent vector, E(r, t) given by Equation 2.3 [15] E(r, t) = E P exp[−ı(k · r − ωct − δ)] (2.3) where, E is the peak electric field amplitude, P is the polarisation matrix vector, k is the propagation vector, r is the range vector, ωc is the carrier angular frequency (≈ 1014 Hz), δ is the carrier phase and t, as usual, represents time. Causality as represented by the Kramers-Kronig relations [16] dictates that any change in the imaginary refractive index, nimag, begets a change in the real refractive index, nreal and vice versa4 . The linewidth-broadening (or linewidth-enhancement) factor, α, is given by Equation 2.4 [17] α ≡ ∆nreal ∆nimag (2.4) where ∆nreal, is the change in the real refractive index inducing a phase change, and ∆nimag is the change to the imaginary refractive index inducing an absorptive change. In an InGaAsP/InP electroabsorption modulator where α is small the application of a reverse-bias electric field increases the absorption (decreases E in Equation 2.3.) Consequently the application of a time-varying electrical signal, s(t), opens a time- varying optical gate or window, E (1 − mas(t)) P exp[−ı(k · r − ωct − δ)] (2.5) where ma ≤ 1, is the amplitude modulation index of the device. In contrast, for LiNBO3, where α is large, the application of an external electical data signal induces 4 Figures 1(a)–(c) of Toll [16] provide a crystal clear exposition and a very intuitive explanation of the Kramers-Kronig relations based on the principle of classical causality—namely that an event cannot precede its cause.
  • 48. Chapter 2 29 Background material a change to the refractive index of the material via the Pockels effect. This modulates the optical path length inducing a phase change to the coherent optical field within the material. This can be converted to an amplitude change when placed in one (or both) arms of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer [19]. It can be represented thus E P exp[−ı(k · r − ωct − δ − mδs(t)] (2.6) where, mδ, is the phase modulation index of the material and is, ideally, an exact multiple of π/2 in the balanced Mach-Zehnder geometry described in Chapter 4. In many cases non-linear effects cause the quantitites in Equation 2.3 to inter- act. For example, direct electrical modulation of a laser modulates both the the amplitude and phase of the emitted optical field. The non-monotonic change of the carrier frequecy is called chirping which leads to power penalties in transmission systems [20]. Gain-switching which was mentioned in the previous subsection is a particular variation of direct modulation (the data stream applied is, essentially, a continuous sequence of ‘1’s.) The, α factor in this case provides a useful index for the wavelength chirp of the device [17, 18]. 2.1.3 Multiplexing One method that can be used to increase the quantity of information carried between a source and a remote destination is to increase the data capacity of the intervening transmission medium. The most obvious technique is to install several more optical fibres to carry additional, but separate time-division multiplexed systems shown in Figure 2.1. However the cost of installing more optical fibre may be economically prohibitive. So in many cases it is preferable to upgrade the transmission and receiving equipment at both the source and destination of the system, especially given that a single optical fibre has an estimated 40THz of bandwidth available in the near-infrared wavelength region. Three techniques are possible: Upgrading of the TDM link by increasing the transmitter and receiver bit-rates; Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM); Optical Time Division Multiplexing (OTDM). 2.1.3.1 Time-division multiplexing A typical TDM system is shown in Figure 2.2. Here the optical data rate transmitted over the optical fibre, the line rate, is equivalent to the electrical signal rate or base-rate. A high-speed electronic multiplexer (MUX) is required to electrically combine the data from several information sources (ISn) before application to an