Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈

1. Texas and the Death Penalty Essay
|
|TEXAS & THE DEATH PENALTY |
|SOC. 312 / |
| |
| |
Putting people to death for breaking the law is a punishment that has been in existence for thousands of years of human history and has been enforced
in all corners of the...show more content...
This criminal code is one of the most sophisticated in the country and has become a model for other states to follow. But research studies conducted to
compare effects of the death penalty nationwide have shown some conflicting results. Comparison studies done to show homicide rates of retentionist
and abolitionist jurisdictions from 1999 to 2001 (Sorenson & Pilgrim) have shown that death penalty states tend to have a higher murder rate than
abolitionist states. This result creates the argument of the overall deterrent effect of execution. Texas is still in the top 20 of states with the highest
homicide rate even though it is the highest in death penalty executions. "If the death penalty were a deterrent, the argument goes, then Texas should be
located among those states with the lowest homicide rates" (Sorenson & Pilgrim, P. 25).
Another subtopic that has caused much debate along with the death penalty is the increasing influence of today's media reporting on capital punishment
cases and pushing to have televised executions as a form of retribution for some viewers and a kind of morbid reality show– entertainment for others.
This also brings in the question of whether or not media coverage of executions
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Capital Punishment Essay
Capital Punishment Capital Punishment is regarded by most as a successful deterrent to murder, but that is because these people don't look at it as it is
applied. According to retributivists such as Kant and Van Den Haag the guilty deserves to be punished. On the other hand, people against the death
penalty like Bedau think that the death penalty is just as much an effective deterrent as life in prison. The most famous retributivist Kant, states that the
guilty ought to get punished because they chose to act wrongly, and by punishing them, we are respecting them as a moral agents. This occurs because
humans are given the ability to reason and act morally and thus if we don't punish them we are not treating them as moral agents....show more content...
Another retributivist, van den Haag, is also a major supporter of the death penalty. He is not concerned about sentencing innocent people to death
because according to him there will always be innocent victims, but that number or percentage must be kept to a minimum. Over the past 85
years, there have been 25 who have proven to be innocent after death, but according to van den Haag this is a reasonable number because there
will always be mistakes(van den Haag, pg252) . People against the death penalty say not only the guilty are being executed, and innocent lives are
being taken, thus we should have a stricter death row sentence to see if it is possible the accuser will be innocent. Also, it would be too difficult to
make a law that ensures that only those committing the worst crimes are sentenced to die, for example if an abused wife decided one day to get
back at her husband and take his life. According to retributivists she doesn't deserve to die even though she is guilty. Also, with the death penalty
race, age and gender come into play. For example, there isn't much media coverage on men on death row, but if there was a women on death row you
wouldn't miss a thing about it. Another example is the case of Ferman vs Georgia in 1972. This case showed that capital punishment is unconstitutional,
but the court didn't say it was cruel and unusual punishment. Consequently, with the fact that the majority of people on death row are usually poor,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Capital Punishment Essay example
Capital Punishment
"Let's keep society safe and give murderers what they deserve – the death penalty".
In this essay I will hope to set out both sides of the argument, for and against Capital Punishment. The advantages and the disadvantages will be
considered in conjunction with Christian teachings and belief. The Christian teachings, Old Testament and New Testament will also be compared with
human reactions to the subject. From my research and analysis in this essay I will be able to come to a conclusion as to whether or not I feel the
death penalty is ever justified
Murder is a crime whether you look at the Bible – Thou shalt not kill The Sixth Commandment – or at a book of English...show more content...
The disadvantages of Capital Punishment are shown most prominently in Jesus and what he stood for, i.e. forgiveness and sanctity of life, also in
the Sermon on the Mount and many other parts of the New Testament. This does give the argument against capital punishment a head start but
there are also other factors to consider. By letting a murderer be put to death you will be legalising murder for the executioner. Who is then to say
who can and cannot kill? If a government decides this, there is sure to be religious opposition, and if for example the Pope decides who can kill
another then he would be going against his own religion. When death is made legal in any way, even in cases of war, it is encouraging violence.
War should and is frequently only a last resort 'Just War'. The death penalty for murder would not be a last resort as there are alternatives and as
again who is to decide which murder and in what circumstances it would warrant another death. In any case and in any trial mistakes could be made.
There will always be the risk that an innocent person will be put to death because of another's mistake. According to Christian beliefs no one should
be killed especially because God, the creator, is the only one who can give and take life, this is called the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. capital punishment Essay
The Ineffectiveness of Capital Punishment
For many years, capital punishment has been in use, but it is not been effective. Theodore Robert Bundy in 1978, slipped into a Tallahassee sorority
house and bludgeoned two sleeping women to death, then killed a 12–year–old girl in Lake City. He was sentenced to three concurrent death sentences
in 1979. Nine years later, Bundy is alive and well on the Death Row (Von Drehle 1A). A prisoner sentenced to death spends an average of 10 years,
nationally, on death row waiting for their execution. More than 2,100 people live on America's death Rows. At the current execution rate, it would take
eighty–two years to kill them all. Death Row is going to get bigger, the wait...show more content...
Half of all death sentences are overturned on appeal, usually after several years of expensive lawsuits and rigorous legal proceedings. For every actual
execution in America, courts sentence thirteen more people to die. Experts are coming to a conclusion that little or nothing can be done to fix the
system if it continues to allow the legal processes concerning the death penalty continue as they are.
According to a study prepared for the Federal Judiciary Committee, the number of capital punishment cases on appeal in the federal courts will be
more than tripled in the next two years if the system continue to operate as it does now. The study concluded that the lawyers needed to handle theses
appeals would cost the nation's taxpayers over thirty million dollars a year. California has 234 prisoners on the Death Row, the third largest population
of convicts awaiting execution in the country. Its last execution was 1967. However, the tax–funded budget for defense attorneys is more that two
million dollars a year, which, again, is actually funded by the citizens of that state.
Capital Punishment is cruel and inhumane. It is a slow process to complete, in terms of actually getting the convict executed, as it is known to take
years before the actual day of execution. Prisoners stay in their cells for about 10 years, courtesy of the tax paying citizens of their respective states,
waiting for their death.
The death
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Capital Punishment
Capital punishment is the execution of a perpetrator for committing a heinous crime (homicide), and it is a hotly debated topic in our society. The
basic issue is whether capital punishment should be allowed as it is today, or abolished in part or in whole. My argument is that:
1)Capital punishment is not an effective deterrent for heinous crimes.
2)Life imprisonment can be worse of a punishment than death, not as costly as execution, and better for rehabilitation.
3)The innocent can be wrongly put to death.
Conclusion: Capital punishment should be abolished.
Though capital punishment might seem like the only way to get revenge, it is morally unjust. Who are we to decide whether a person should live or
die? It is morally...show more content...
Murderers have the lowest rate of re–committing a homicide than people who have served time for other offenses (Johnson, 1990).
The Innocent With convictions and executions, there is always a chance that someone was wrongly filed with charges. What are we to do with these
people? In a study of capital convictions from 1900 to 1986 conducted by Radelet and Bedau, 350 cases were identified in which defendants were
mistakenly convicted of crimes they did not commit, and of these 350, 24 were executed. Though 24 un–called for executions in 87 years don't sound
too bad, the number should be zero. Society must determine whether the risk of wrongly executing an innocent person is worth taking to reap the
benefits of executions of convicted murderers.
Conclusion
The latest information for Amnesty International states that 70 countries have completely abolished the death penalty for all crimes. Thirteen countries
have abolished the death penalty for all but exceptional crimes, such as wartime crimes. Twenty–three countries haven't abolished the death penalty by
law, but haven't carried out any executions in the last ten years. Once abolished, most countries do not reintroduce the death penalty. Since 1985, 35
countries have abolished the death penalty. During that period, only four reintroduced it В– Nepal then once again abolished it. During 1998 at least
2,258 prisoners are known to have been executed in 37 countries and 4,845 sentenced to death in 78
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Capital Punishment
Capital Punishment
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the toughest form of punishment enforced today in the United States. According to the online
Webster dictionary, capital punishment is defined as "the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner as a punishment for a seriouscrime, often called a
capital offence or a capital crime" (1). In those jurisdictions that practice capital punishment, its use is usually restricted to a small number of criminal
offences, principally, treason and premeditated murder. In the 38 U.S. states and within the federal government currently upholding and enforcing death
penalty statutes, this method of punishment varies quite differently amongst them. It is a controversial issue...show more content...
The crime rate is lower in the states that do not invoke capital punishment, but as Walter Burns stated "the number of murders tend to rise with the
crime rate in general–and not only in America (4). Capital punishment is maintained to hopefully show criminals that when they kill they will
eventually meet the same fate. By enforcing the death penalty, the government could be trying to scare criminals from their crimes, and in some cases
it has worked. When the death penalty was restored in Kansas, for example, the homicide rate dropped considerably (7). According to research done by
Bedau, the crime rate continued to soar between 1960–1969, when capital punishment was rarely being used in most states (7). As a whole, capital
punishment has worked to lower homicidal crimes and deter criminals from illegal actions. Capital punishment could help to keep repeat offenders off
the streets. In some states the common belief is that imprisoning the murders of society in penitentiaries will keep them from killing again, but this is
not true. Even when criminals are imprisoned, their killing can still continue. Bedau did a survey of all the male inmates in state penitentiaries during
the year of 1973. He came to the conclusion that after the men were imprisoned for one year, at least sixteen homicides were reported (7). In effect, the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

7. Essay on Capital Punishment
Capital Punishment
The definition of capital punishment is the legal punishment of death for violating criminal law. The person who gets capital punishment is the ones
who committed serious crimes. Methods of capital punishment throughout the world are by stoning, beheading, hanging, electrocution, lethal injection
and shooting. The two most common methods capital punishment use in the United States are lethal injection and electrocution.
The lethal injection is the most used form of capital punishment. It's an intravenous shot that kills the criminal quick and painless. When capital
punishment is done by electrocution the criminal is strapped to a chair that a volts of electricity is pass through.
In America if all people agree...show more content...
The first pros of capital punishment are that it works as deterrence against major crimes. The death penalty is a punishment that creates fear in the mind
of any sane person. Most criminals would think twice if they knew their own lives were at stake. Although there is no statistical evidence that death
penalty deters crime, we have to agree that most of us fear death.
The most conclusive evidence that criminals fear the death penalty more than life without parole is provided by convicted capital murderers and their
attorneys. 99.9% of all convicted capital murderers and their attorneys argue for life, not death, in the punishment phase of their trial. (prodeathpenalty)
A Second pro is that a criminal that is executed can't another crime or escape. A dead criminal can no longer commit a crime, and therefore the danger
to the public is permanently removed.
A third pro of capital punishment is that it's more economical. Why should money be spent on a criminal when it could be spent on education, the
sick, or the needy? The only reason why it is so expensive to execute an individual, is because of the numerous appeal processes. (~ab2166)
Another pro is that the retribution to the family and loves ones of the victims is payed. Endless stress and anxiety plague the families of the victims
and executions puts all those stresses to rest better than life–long imprisonment or

8. Get more content on HelpWriting.net