This presentation was presented at the launch of the OECD report “Rethinking Regional Development Policy-making” on 19 March 2018 in Brussels.
http://www.oecd.org/governance/rethinking-regional-development-policy-making-9789264293014-en.htm
1. Anwar Shah (shah.anwar@gmail.com),
Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution, USA and Director, Center for Public
Economics, Chengdu, China
19 March 2018
OECD/EC Launch Event: Rethinking Regional Development Policy-
Making
EC, Brussels, Belgium
Development Assistance and Conditionality:
Lessons from principles and practices
3. Input and process based conditionality has little conceptual or empirical
support…1
Conceptual
Approach
Improving aid
effectiveness
Implications for conditionality
Game
Theory (no-
cooperative
strategic
behavior)
Address donor agency
incentives and impose
higher admin. cost of non-
compliance on the recipient
Conditionality to ensure sharing of
rewards for success and risks of failures
Public
Choice
(collusive
behavior)
Greater competition, voice
and exit options
Governance environment as a pre-
requisite of assistance
Fiscal
Federalism
(shared
objectives but
conflicting
interests and
priorities)
Consistency of design and
objectives. Singular focus.
Autonomy with results
accountability. Effective
institutions of
intergovernmental relations
Output based conditionality. General
budget support less desirable for merit
services. No borrowing for policy and
institutional reforms
4. Analytical perspectives favor incentive regime for results based
accountability to citizens for both donors and recipients ……2
Conceptual
Approach
Improving aid
effectiveness
Implications for conditionality
Political
Economy
(domestic
consensus for
reform)
Focus on recipient country
institutions
Political economy analysis as a pre-
requisite. Conditions to facilitate
coalition building for reform
New Public
Management
(HR incentives
undermine aid
effectiveness)
Reform aid staff and civil
service culture and
introduce results based
management and
accountability
Monitor results based chain and hold
donor and recipients to account for
results.
New
Institutional
Economics
(Aid agencies
and govt. have
incomplete
Citizen empowerment,
home rule, direct
democracy, transparency,
reducing transactions costs
to hold government and aid
Contractually enforceable conditions
through citizens based accountability.
Greater role of local governments in
service delivery and as primary agents
of people.
6. Lessons from Practice: Design of Conditionality
• Conditionality can be an important tool for
positive inducement for commitment,
ownership, mutual and citizen-based
accountability. However, conditionality must
be consistent with reform objectives.
• Conditions and associated indicators must be ,
mission critical, parsimonious, objectively and
accurately measurable, timely, meaningful,
comprehensible, grounded in the results based
chain, simple, comparable and well
documented.
7. Lessons on the design of conditionality…2
• Program design must mitigate unintended
negative consequences of conditionality. Input
or process based conditionality accentuate
moral hazards. Uncoordinated cross
conditionality should be avoided by
designating a donor institution in the lead
agency role.
• Fragmentation and non-predictability of
assistance and non-credibility of conditions
compromises development effectiveness.
8. Lessons on the design of conditionality…3
• Use country systems to minimize administrative
burdens of recipient performance and compliance
monitoring.
• Results-based (output) conditionality helps
mitigate strategic game theoretic responses from
the recipient and donor agency staff and furthers
development effectiveness of external assistance.
• Donor conditions can help inclusive and
sustainable development by encouraging greater
transparency, results based accountability, and
citizen empowerment through direct democracy
and rights based approaches to basic public
services.
9. General Lessons from Practice
• Aid conditionality should facilitate network
governance and partnership for development.
• Instrument choice must be consistent with
reform objectives. For example, loan finance
and general budget support (GBS)
questionable for policy, structural and
governance reforms and for finance of
operating expenditures of merit services.
• “Government ownership” in the absence of citizen-
centric governance holds no assurance of “country
ownership”.
10. General Lessons ….2
• Better knowledge of the “reach” of development
assistance helps in its effectiveness.
• For results based accountability to work , HR
management framework in aid agencies and
government must embody results based management
and evaluation. Reform of governance structures
(executive boards) also critical.
• Need for Arm’s-length Civil Society Evaluations:
Broken information feedback loop is better
overcome by higher standards of transparency and
RBM rather than aid agency spending on in-house
“independent” or aid agency financed evaluations.
11. Thankyou!
Reference:
Shah, Anwar (2017). Development Assistance and Conditionality:
Challenges in Design and Options for More Effective Assistance.
Unpublished paper, May 2017, OECD/EC.