3. Are emergency admissions rising?
Possible reasons
•Aging population
•Public expectations
•More treatable
illness
•Defensive medicine
•Central targets/
Payment by Results
•Changes in other
linked services
•Over reliance on
Number of emergency admissions in England 1996-2009, A&E for urgent care
with period investigated marked in red
Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?
4. Is it just emergency admissions?
Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency
7. How does the rise consume resources?
2.5 Estimated cost of the rise
2.4
in emergency admissions
is equivalent to at least an
2.3
additional £330 million in
Emergency bed days (millions)
2.2 2008/09 (compared to
2004/05 activity costed at
2.1
2008/09 payment levels).
2
1.9
However, the actual value
is likely to be higher due to
1.8
inflation in the tariff over
1.7 time and payment for non-
Not clipped
tariff work.
1.6 Clipped 3 months
1.5
200404
200406
200408
200410
200412
200502
200504
200506
200508
200510
200512
200602
200604
200606
200608
200610
200612
200702
200704
200706
200708
200710
200712
200802
200804
200806
200808
200810
200812
200902
8. Is the pattern of stay length changing?
Number of emergency admissions categorised by emergency bed days (EBDs) used in spell,
excluding spells in mental health and undefined Healthcare Resource Groups (HRGs) 2001-2009
Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?
9. Is the increase related to age?
Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency
10. Has the case mix of emergency admissions changed?
11. Has the case fatality rate changed?
30000 15%
13%
25000
11%
20000
9%
Deaths
15000 7%
5%
10000
3%
5000
1%
0 -1%
200404
200406
200408
200410
200412
200502
200504
200506
200508
200510
200512
200602
200604
200606
200608
200610
200612
200702
200704
200706
200708
200710
200712
200802
200804
200806
200808
200810
200812
200902
Observed Expected Percentage of emergency admissions that end with death
Emergency admissions that end in death, showing observed deaths, expected deaths (standardised for age, sex, and HRG at
2004/05 rates) and percentage of total emergency admissions
12. Is the rise linked to the A&E target in England?
Trade-off analysis between four-hour target breaches and short stay emergency admissions in England (all A&E types)
Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?
13. Is the rise linked to the A&E target in particular trusts?
Trade-off analysis between four-hour target breaches and short stay emergency admissions in
another trust (all A&E types)
Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency
14. Do all PCTs show the same pattern?
(a) Age and sex
standardised emergency
admission ratio in
2004/05 (green, lowest,
to red, highest)
(b) Absolute increase by
2008/09 (blue, dark =
highest, light = lowest)
Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?
15. The evidence in summary...
Possible reason Comments
Aging population Accounts for some of the increase, but not all
Public expectations Increased demand for health services
More treatable illness No significant change in case mix, although vague
symptoms increase disproportionately
Defensive medicine The increase is due to short stay admissions; but could
be many other explanations for these...
Central targets/Payment No evidence of 4-hour target driving systematic
by Results increase, and slightly pre-dates PbR
Change in other linked Could regional variation in the increase be a symptom
services of this?
Over reliance on A&E for A&E attendance is increasing, as are admissions
urgent care through A&E
16. Efficiency breeds inefficiency paradox?
Reduction in More
length of stay beds
available
Provider efficiency System inefficiency
Less severe Admission
cases threshold reduced
admitted
Better and more Lower acuity cases using
efficient care costly inpatient care