Similarities And Other Empires Similarities

Similarities And Other Empires Similarities
Empires over the centuries have certain aspects that are similar and different than other empires. Empires tend to deal with the same situations, but
they also handle it in various ways. There are certain things empires can't avoid dealing with like currency, war, disease, religion, traitors, etc. Siberia
in Russia, Spanish America, and Haiti in France are no different from those circumstances. The main differences and similarities between the three
countries will be religion and money. Russia was the world's largest territorial empire that categorized under an Asia making it an European power (p.
553). One of the main things certain empires had in common was currency. The standard silver coin was used in North America, Europe, India, Russia,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

British Empire Essay
THE BRITISH EMPIRE
The British Empire was the largest empire in history and for a time was the foremost global power. It was a product of the European age of discovery,
which began with the maritime explorations of the 15th century, that sparked the era of the European colonial empires.
By 1921, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, approximately one–quarter of the world's population. It covered
about 36.6 million kmВІ (14.2 million square miles), about a quarter of Earth's total land area. As a result, its legacy is widespread, in legal and
governmental systems, economic practice, militarily, educational systems, sports, and in the global spread of the English language. At the peak of its
power, it...show more content...
In 1600, the English East India Company was established to facilitate the trade, but because of the then continuing war with Spain, the British overseas
interests were limited to mainly raiding Spanish fleets.
SIR WALTER RALEIGH'S FAILED ATTEMPT TO COLONIZE AMERICA
The very first attempt at creating a British colony in the Americas was launched by the English adventurer, Sir Walter Raleigh, in 1585. This settlement
did not survive, and the English did not attempt further exploration and colonization in the Americas until 1604, after peace had been made with
Spain. Raleigh himself gained fame in the war with Spain, but fell out of favor with the English monarch and was later imprisoned in the Tower of
London, finally being executed in 1618.
NORTH AMERICA COLONIZED IN 17TH CENTURY
During the 17th Century, Britain established its first permanent colonies in North America, first in Virginia, and then in the Caribbean, with tobacco
plantations in the West Indies and religious colonies along the Atlantic coast of North America.
FIRST SLAVES IN AMERICA WERE WHITE
The first British foothold in the West Indies was Saint Christopher (later Saint Kitts), acquired in 1623. A little known fact about the first English
plantations established in the West Indies was that the laborers who were first used to work

Empire Builders Essay
What are some of the disadvantages, problems or difficulties experienced by Empire builders?вЂЁ
Empires with their self prophesied title, innately express the notion of expansion! Builders of empires through the ages have consistently shown the
somewhat insatiable need to expand! It is this notion of expansion or more specifically the "necessity" for it (Leroy–Beaulieu, 1891), that seems a
continual challenge for "empire builders" to control and therefore sustain. As an empire expands the ability to sustain, regulate and control its realm,
provides continual challenges for local economies. With an obsession for treasures and profits over social health and sustainability (McClintock, 1995),
"How, despite their "good intentions" did the British...show more content...
With pots of gold (lucrative international markets) at the end of a distant rainbow, the cities elite "fiercely resisted out side regulation" (Darwin,
2009) leaving them to reign for the most part, unchallenged and unchecked. With the economic sky remaining clear, the empire elites where able to
gain great wealth and power through monopolisation of commodities and industry. Unfortunately because of the autonomy allowed to the elites (also
enhanced by ideals of race supremacy and hierarchal traditions), they became entrenched in ideology and bureaucracy escaping the critique that was
necessary for accountability and appropriate regulation. The economic hub became a "great arena where private savings were mobilised for
investment overseas (Darwin, 2009) feeding the perpetual wheel of individual greed, exchanging the souls (if you like) of local economies and
'scooping out' the real assets of an enterprise while selling on 'shrivelled carcasses' to a bamboozled public (Darwin,

Many consider the British Empire as the most powerful and successful empire to have ever existed. Despite not having many resources or a large
population, the small island soon had control throughout the world, accentuating the saying, "The sun never sets on the British Empire". The British
Empire's presence lasted for nearly four hundred years, through various external and internal conflicts that threatened the country's resources, people,
colonies, and more. The British Empire rose due to a number of different activities done by the British, consisting primarily from its economic
strategies, its colonization methods, its military prowess and cultural conversion of natives.
For an empire to exist, it must have wealth. Without money, empires typically do not last long, falling due to the lack of funding for their expansion.
The Empire's improvement of various monetary techniques enabled them to extend through their financial might. Their advancement of joint stock
companies helped to grow their power monetarily. Originally, these companies were controlled by investor funds, and did not have much, if any
government control. Since they were not involved with the government, the company's main goal was to profit from their actions, which spread the
influence of the British people. The government, however, did acknowledge the benefits of these companies, and provided benefits to them that
allowed for their expansion. One way that the government was able to help the company was

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Essay
The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire The Roman Empire was a beautiful place ruled by Augustus. The borders of the empire during the Pax
Romana measured 10,000 miles and enclosed an area of more than 3 million square miles, that's about the size of the United States today. The
population of the empire during this period was between 70 and 90 million people. The city of Rome itself was home to about one million people.
During the third century (A.D. 200–300), problems confronted the Roman Empire. The decline of the empire continued for almost 300 hundred years.
The Roman Empire was brought to its downfall because of the way their Social, Political, and Economic systems were working. Historians say that the
Roman Empire began to...show more content...
Advanced militarism attracted men looking for victory. The character of the soldiers changed from armed men fighting to defend their homes and
families to men signing up to fight as mercenaries. As demand increased for foreign goods, currency flowed out of Rome to foreign countries.
Rome and its people no longer believed in their empire, and didn't care much about family values anymore. The Economic issues were that they
had poor harvest. Food was scarce and people needed food so they went after it. There was a disruption of trade by barbarians and pirates on
Mediterranean Sea lanes. Since the war was over, there was no more war booty. Gold and silver were drained away to buy things from foreign
countries, this led to inflation, a drop in the worth of money and a rise in prices. The Roman road and bridge system fell out of order, causing a hurt in
trade. The crushing tax fell all upon the plebian class, who had no money to start with. Everything was quickly spiraling downhill. The Empire's
economy was worsened by its military problems. Tribes of northern barbarians called Goths overran the legions guarding the Danube frontier numerous
times. Instead of fighting for patriotism, Roman soldiers now fought for money. The government promised higher cash awards to attract recruits into
the army. Emperors started to recruit barbarians because they would

The Persian Empire Essay
THE PERSIAN EMPIRE Similar to the Roman Empire the Persian Empire stretched across vast lands without any serious rivalry. At the height of
the empire it stretched across, not only, Asia, from the Aegean to the Indus River, but also included part of the continent of Africa. We get the word,
Persia, from the Greek word Parsa meaning, "Above reproach". The Persians unlike most other Empires would be ruled under a benevolent ruler. This
would bring a large amount of cultural diffusion to the Empire. The empires history is separated into three historical periods: Old Persia (600–300
B.C.E), Middle Persia (300–800 B.C.E.) and modern Persia (800–Present). The height or the Empire was reached around 500 B.C.E. (Ancient and
Medieval History...show more content...
This is probably due to the following portion of the cylinder: "The population of Babylon calls blessings on my kingship, and I have enabled all the
lands to live in peace. Every day I copiously supplied ... geese, two ducks and ten pigeons more than the geese, ducks and pigeons .... I sought out to
strengthen the guard on the wall Imgur–Enlil, the great wall of Babylon, and ... the quay of baked brick on the bank of the moat which an earlier king
had built but not completed, I ... its work. ... Which did not surround the city outside, which no earlier king had built, his troops, and the levee
from his land, in/to Shuanna? ... With bitumen and baked brick I built anew, and completed its work. ... Great doors of cedar wood with copper
cladding. I installed all their doors, threshold slabs and door fittings with copper parts." *(British Museum) Long before the great king, Cyrus'
death the Persian Empire had reached the milestone that allowed it to be the first empire that was so large. Cyrus had a son, who took over the
throne in 530 B.C.E., named Cambyses II. Cambyses would show the same ambition we saw in his father. In 525 B.C.E he added Egypt to the
Persian Empire. His victory was not to be enjoyed for long. He died in 522 B.C.E. and it is assumed that he may have died from a sword wound. This
wound is believed to be accidental. Although, his death was not mourned for like that of his father. This may have been due to his

What Makes An Empire So Successful?
The empire is wealthy. Success is constant; the trained and equipped army group is destroying enemies. Having three leaders on each satrap is both
effective and innovative. Having postal service and roads makes communication simple. Although there is much to commend, my job is more
effective when I correct mistakes, although there are few errors, some are evident. The greater society would benefit in changes such as, having the
group of 100,000 almost defenseless warriors cared for; raising the tribute prices and compromise wit the conquered about keeping laws, religion, and
language after being conquered; and spreading out ethnic groups. Having the majority of your military being drafted, unprepared and unequipped is
ineffective and offensive to the civilians. A necessary part of creating a united empire is influencing the people to feel valued. Having 100,000 people
with clubs as weapon fighting against spears and swords is forcing them to feel...show more content...
Currently, the empire is divided into 20 different ethnic groups. It can be a great thing to be diverse when done correctly, but this is not the best
way to deal with the situation. By incentivizing people to spread you not only limit the chance of destruction but also force people to benefit from
others. Different skillsets can combine to make an ideal group. This will bring the dying Persian culture back to life. Everyone will know people
with the Persian culture and after experiencing it; the culture might rub off on them. Persians are a minority and this change will help make the
culture known and still keep diversity. Another benefit would be people less likely to rebel because of paying tribute because they will be with less
people of the same laws, religion and language. With a strong known culture, small chances of rebellion and people benefiting from each other this
empire will success like no other civilization has ever

Essay American Empire
Michael Cox's thesis as outlined in "Empire by Denial? Debating US Power", is chiefly that: the United States of America is an empire, and that
current beliefs to the contrary are the result of denialism due to negative connotations associated with the concept of empire, not due to a lack of
suitability of that term to describe the current state of American foreign policy. The first issue which Cox raises is that of a lack of understanding of
and study into the concept of empire by current research in the field of international relations (Cox 2004, p230). This element would appear to be
sound, but only in so far as it relates to Cox's other assertion that the orthodoxy of American society and academia are opposed to labelling America an
...show more content...
His argument becomes unconvincing when it becomes clear that Cox is playing the role of both legislature and judiciary, crafting the terms to meet his
needs and then applying them. Whilst the underlying evidence he presents is sound, the multitude of conflicting arguments make clear the selectivity
in evidence employed in order to reach these conclusions (Security Dialogue 2004). As with any argument though concerning matters of perspective,
both our own status as outsiders, and that of Cox, being himself British born (FORA.tv 2007), lead credence to Cox's assertion of an American empire,
himself asserting the supposed obviousness of his thesis to anyone outside of the USA. Recognising and accounting for this though, the evidence
offered about the many 'non–standard' forms of empire are still sound. Fisher (1984) highlights the success of British incorporation of local political
structures into its empire, and Cox's contention that American promotion of seemingly anti–imperial ideas of democracy and self determination are not
in contradiction to its presiding over an empire are sound on examination of the underlying elements. The cohesive strength of an American empire lies
not in the hard power capabilities of the USA to enforce their will, but in the loose and forgiving way in which it rules

Empires And Its Impact On The Society
At a point and time in history there were empires and people that had authority or more power over another. To distinguish whether the empires were
advantageous or disadvantageous we have to look at circumstances from their perspective and also it depends on the colony. Cities like Rome had its
flaws just as any other nation. The city have encountered aspects that are still known today like their culture art, architecture or signature designs, and
even their entertainment at theaters that are remembered. However they deteriorated from multiple wars, poverty, and unfair treatment. Empires may
have not been so effective to the people that lived amongst them. To better understand the effects that the empire have on the communities and
people of this time period you must first understand what an empire is. An empire is a political construct in which one state dominates over another
state or a series of states. From prior knowledge one can infer that an empire is usually ruled by an emperor. To the people that lived in those empires
in that past they were disadvantageous and not beneficial to them in many ways. Majority of the empires have declined and you have to think
analytically on why. When people think of an empire, dominance usually comes to mind and these people were submissive to the more powerful
person in this unity. Due to the emperors having power they had the authority and legitimacy to get the people to do anything. Rome for example was
considered to be a city of

Early Civilizations And Empires Essay
What Distinct Characteristics Did the Early Civilizations and Empires of the Middle East and Egypt Develop? Early civilizations and empires of the
Middle East and Egypt developed several distinct characteristics. Babylon, Ancient Israelites, and Egypt developed characteristics that included
governmental, social, and economic structures as well as distinct religions and innovations. These civilizations and empires existed between 2,575 B.C.
– 323 B.C. and most of them had notable rulers. One of the civilizations in the ancient Middle East was Babylon. Babylon had two kingdoms; The Old
Kingdom which ranged from 1,790 B.C. – 1,595 B.C., and the New Kingdom that ranged from 625 B.C. – 539 B.C. Hammurabi and Nebuchadnezzar
were Babylon kings. Hammurabi was the first king to codified laws, which he named Hammurabi's Code. His code was split up into two section, the
first was a civil law that dealt with private rights and matters, such as business contracts, property inheritance, and more. The second section dealt with
matters such as robberies, assaults, and murder. Babylon...show more content...
under the ruling of Cyrus the Great. Under emperor Darius, Persia had a bureaucracy, which meant that they had a system of government through
departments and subdivisions administered by officials who follow a set of rules. He also divided the empire into provinces, each called a satrapy
and headed by a governor called a satrap. Darius also drew up a single code of laws for the empire, similar to what Hammurabi did. He did this in
hopes of improving trade, Darius also set up a common set of weights and measures, and he encourage the usage of coins. But most people continued
to be part of the barter economy. However the coins system brought merchants and traders into an early form of a money economy. A Persian thinker
named Zoroaster rejected the old Persian gods and taught that a single wise god, named Ahura Mazda. This was the first presence of

The Rise Of The German Empire
In 1815, Europe, little did it know, gained a new Empire established by the Congress of Vienna. When Germany came into power there were many
obstacles, namely the division of the state by languages . It waged multiple smaller wars over years and a power struggle occurred from the time of its
emergence throughout its history. Many great leaders helped reform and unite the regions of Germany, such asOtto von Bismarck, strengthened and
built the German Empire. The climax of the German Empire was World War I as its new found power was displayed on the world stage. The decline of
the German Empire however had just as many contributing factors, including an unstable political atmosphere, destruction during World War I, and
inflation within the...show more content...
Although the crown was turned down, the impact of the revolutions was a development of Nationalism which would only increase in years to come.
Throughout the beginning of the rise of Germany, the conflict between Austrian and Prussian control over the German State persisted. There were no
clear lines as to where the German State ended and Austria began. The most significant factor in dividing states was language where German and
Danish speaking lands were split.
Until 1866 and the 7 Weeks War, Austria had maintained most of the leadership over the German State as declared by the Congress of Vienna in
1815. The Prussians had a swift victory over Austria in this quick war and a treaty, signed on 23 August 1866, gavePrussia power through the leadership
of Otto Von Bismarck. As part of the treaty, Austria remained completely intact, although humiliated. Three of the Catholic states are recognized as
independent, but maintain deep economic ties to Germany under Bismarck. Once power has been established over the German State by Prussia, the
Franco–Prussian War had a front to begin on. The three catholic states sided with the Prussian King in support of the German Cause and solidify the
Empire's territory. France was defeated almost as quickly as Austria had been only a few years earlier. Although an armistice was reached in Versailles,
it

The City–state of Rome became a republic in 509 BC. Rome fought numerous battles to become what it was at its height. It all started with the Punic
wars. After they won, there was no stopping them. By the first century BC, Rome controlled most of the known world. (Mahoney, 2001) With Augustus
Caesar began the two centuries of the Pax Romana. During this time all of Rome became a collection of states rather than conquered provinces. The
only threats that ever came were from the unorganized barbarian tribes who's conquest brought nothing to the Empire. (Mahoney, 2001) The rise of the
Roman Empire had many contributors. These factors would include strength in the military, society, leadership, religious, and architectural aspects of the
...show more content...
Emperor Hadrian concentrated more on how the Empire was run verses making it larger. He also helped start the Pax Romana (Roman Peace).
(Mahoney, 2001) The fourth factor was the amazing engineers, inventors, and architects in the Empire. By 200 AD the Romans had built 53,000
miles of roads throughout the Empire. The very first was built in 312 BC. They also invented sewers, central heating systems, and the first types
of concrete. (Mahoney, 2001) The last of all the factors was religion. The Romans worshiped around 30,000 gods in all. These included the major
gods and goddesses such as Jupiter, the chief god, Neptune, god of the sea, Venus, goddess of love and beauty, and Minerva, goddess of wisdom
and war. Each household also worshipped their own protective spirits. After Caesar's death, the emperors were considered gods too. People all
over the empire were allowed to worship their own local gods as long as they paid homage to the Roman gods. The people built large temples for
worship of their different gods. They looked to the gods to help protect their families and lives. This also helped when going into battle. How could
you not win with so many gods on your side? (Mahoney, 2001) As you have read, many things attributed to the rise of the Empire. Many things also
attributed to its fall as well. These included poor leadership, economic trouble, as well as growth aspects. (Mahoney, 2001) The Empire began with
great leaders, but they

The Rule Of The Empire Essay
Throughout history, state power and religious influence have gone hand in hand. Rulers and their governmental bodies have used their power and
influence in an attempt to spread their religious mantra to their populace. Asoka, of the Mauryan empire, wanted to use his religion in order to
establish his empire as a stronghold of peace and prosperity. In stark contrast to that, Emperor Trajan of Rome wanted for Christians under his
dominion to be persecuted in order to keep the status quo of the empire. Walking the line between acceptance and persecution, Emperor Constantine of
Rome attempted to use persuasion in order to coax people to convert to Christianity. No matter the efforts used, the conversion methods that those
rulers used, the conversion methods that those rulers undertook had a great effect on the populace that they controlled. The effects that this religious
indoctrination had, however, is determined entirely by the qualities of the ruler, the culture that region adopted, and the characteristics of the religion
that the ruler attempted to propagate Asoka is commonly known today as a fair ruler who was just in his dealings and accepting of multiple cultures
and faiths; however, he was not always a benevolent and fair ruler. His conversion to Buddhism was a direct result of the Battle of Kalinga. The Battle
of Kalinga was the last campaign of the Mauryan Dynasty. It took place in the Kingdom of Kalinga, and was a devastating engagement, with over one
hundred

Rise And Fall Of The Persian Empire
can be seen through the documented evidence left behind from the ancient civilisation that the Persian Empire [550BCE – 331BCE] was crafted with a
combination of various attributes such as, strong standing armies that were prepared to fight through the worst of situations for their leaders, the
assisstance of skillful leadership and the respectfulness of a kind and caring King, a tolerance and resilience towards various situations and problems
that could arise, and an effective government. As it would appear, these qualities had a major impact on the lives of those that lived within the Persian
Empire as without them, the empire started to crumble and dissolve. There were a magitude of factors that lead to the slow fall and decline of the...show
more content...
These revolts caused the rulers of the time to abandon their religious beliefs, and work for 'evil spirits'. As it would appear, the Kings of the empire
became lustful and filled with greed to the point that stealing from their countries supplies was legalised to further their own riches, rather than giving
it back to the people of the land. The civilians no longer recieved the resources needed to build and scuplt various beautiful artworks, and ancient
buildings, and thus, the level of production throughout the land decreased. As the production rate decreased, the Persian taxes became heavier and
more oppressive, which lead to an economic depression and various revolts against the governing bodies and higher classes, which, of course, lead to
more repressive taxes. As the revolts continued on the Persian Kings started hoarding gold and silver rather than re–circulating it, and as a result of
their actions, the economic situation declined further as there was not enough gold or silver to keep businesses going, and prompting

Why Do Empires Fall?
Introduction Empires rise, but they can fall. Empires need to have the correct mindset in order to rise properly. If they don't then they could
accidentally let in invaders. If empires have the strongest technology, they could make other empires fall and make themselves become more
successful as an empire. But if the empire is too full of themselves, they could cause a civil war. The empire also needs a strong ruler. If an empire
does not have a ruler, then there would be no empire. Desire One way that an empire can rise is if they have the desire to even become an empire in
the first place. This is very important because the empire has to know what they are capable and incapable of doing. If parts of an union do not want
to become an empire, then they could possibly break off into a...show more content...
Everyone one Earth eventually dies. Leaders are important, so when a leader dies, everyone might go out of control! Without a ruler, the empire
could not know what to do and fight against who the new ruler will be, which will cause a civil war. Losing a ruler can cause an empire to slowly fall.
Civil War One of the most common ways that an empire falls is a civil war. When an empire has a civil war, that shows their weaknesses to enemies.
When enemies know each other's weaknesses, this could cause a world war, and for the empire to fall. Small infighting can lead up to a civil war. A
civil war is a common cause for an empire to fall. Conclusion As you can see, can rise in many different ways. The cause for an empire's rise can be
because of technology, a great leader,or the desire to become an empire. But empires can also fall. The cause for an empire to fall could be invaders,
the loss of a leader, or a civil war. Empires rise and fall, but a good question is, if you know that you will eventually fall, then why

The Pros And Cons Of The British Empire
Did you know that the British Empire, the most extensive empire in world history, ruled approximately 1/4 of the world's population and covered
about 1/4 of Earth's total land area which explained how and why Britain was gaining so much power? It's recognizable that Britain only gains global
power because the advantages of regional issues in Europe such as trading, compromising and finances. During the 18 century, Britain and France
fought many battles causing issues to Europes people leaving them with nothing and nothing to look to, But today you cannot tell they were enemies.
The other countries in Europe had a disadvantage to these three things so they lacked the skills of gaining power so if they are lacking the skill it
shows them that they didn't have enough power to challenge Britain. Britain had extraordinary tactics for example when they started...show more
content...
Finances was another reason why Britain had global power when Britain had the chance to get or earn money they did. For example, when Britain
made the Bengali government pay for paying military expenses and war transportation, This gave them much more of a reputation. When Britain
agreed to MirJafar paying the troops if he needed them again for war showed that Britain got what they wanted and forced them to get what they
needed, The British also had help when Spain taxed the Spanish colonist to sell goods. The reason the British needed the products to be taxed was
so they could gain higher profits and power, by them making a higher profit allowed them to get things they needed for war. The reason Britain has
so much money is that they made allies with people and made compromises, Britain did a trade for trade that guaranteed they wouldn't have to pay for
the war. This caused Britain to gain the most power and control europe by doing things that involved selling and fighting to show that they are the big
team and will always

Early Empires Essay
The early empires, numerous and powerful, provided structure for a long amount of time. While some may be far apart, they share some similar
features. Highlighted in Chapter 3, the Roman, Persian, Mauryan, and Han Empires show a glimpse of early societies. All empires had one main
focus: expanding their territory. In addition to the expansion of territories, they shared the desire to establish different types of governments. Most of
the empires shared the same polytheistic origins, contributing all of their success to the gods. However, these territories differed. While many had
classes in society, each treated their people differently. A few dynasties offered full rights, while some only granted freedom to select citizens.
Eventually, all

The Roman Empire Essay
Question C:
The Roman empire was large and very vast. It encompassed many different cultures that fell under Roman political rule. Romanization or becoming a
Roman is described by studying the changes in everyday life to include language and religious practices, and from drinking habits and personal names.
The western provinces of the Roman empire had a long and trouble some experience throughout its history. Much of the Britain and Germanic Gaul's
history was destroyed by the Romanization process, so much so, that modern studies describe the history of those areas from a Roman perspective.
While Tacticus was governor of Britain, Agricola, he practiced the civilizing mission or known as the Tacitean coda, which increased the number of
temples, forums and villas being built in Britain. Tacticus also made sure that Latin was spoken more widely and that sons of native elites were
educated in Roman ways. By the reign of Tiberius, the Roman town of Augustodunum in central Gaul was equipped with a school, where the elite
youth of the Gallic provinces could receive a decent liberal, Greek and Latin education.
Furthermore, Rome made Roman things fashionable. People aspired to be and look Roman, since Roman–ness was associated with power. The Roman
states was always willing to assimilate people who looked, spoke, and behaved like good Romans. So there were strong incentives favoring the
'self–Romanization' of the western provincial elites. Additionally, the assimilation of pottery

Causes of the Fall of the Roman Empire Essay
For a long period of time, Rome seemed like an unstoppable empire. It conquered the majority of the land surrounding it, including Greece, Turkey,
Iraq, and many of its other neighboring countries. It seemed as though Rome would conquer the entire world, as it was the center of it, until it began
to decline in 476 C.E. The very aspects that made it so successful were the ones that caused its collapse. Various political, religious, and economic
reasons caused its downfall. The fact that the entire economy of Rome collapsed and money became worthless was a major reason for the empire's
collapse. In addition, the loss of a common religion and lack of efficient ruling in relation to its vast territory affected the empire. The Roman...show
more content...
They were the main economic boost of the empire, and were now lost. Unlike with political and religious reasons involved in the fall of the empire,
regardless of what laws were changes and removed or what actions were taken, nothing could reverse the effect of this terrible economy on the
Roman Empire. (http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=22703, Sterns page 108) At one time, all of Rome was united by a common religion. This
religion, commonly referred to as the Roman religion, was derived from the religion in Greece. Members of this religion, which included the
majority, if not all, of the Roman citizens, worshiped many different gods, including the creator or father god, Jupiter, the sun god, Apollo, the god of
inspiring wars, Mars, and many others as well. The popularity of this religion began to decline when Christianity arose. It appealed to the majority of
the people, particularly the lower class and slaves, who now had something to put their hope and faith in. This religion spread rapidly, and Roman
emperors felt that because it was so influential it would become a possible threat. These leaders began persecuting Christians, but many Romans had
already committed to this religion and refused to abandon it because they viewed it as the most important part of their life. This led to a lack of
patriotism in Roman citizens who then rejected politics and became independent of the government. (http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=22703,

Similarities And Other Empires Similarities

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Need Help Writing My Paper Frostburg

More from Need Help Writing My Paper Frostburg (15)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Similarities And Other Empires Similarities