The document discusses the literary technique of stream of consciousness. It is defined as the continuous flow of thoughts, feelings and memories in the human mind as revealed through long passages of soliloquy or interior monologue. It mentions that William James described it as a moment when the human mind has a long train of uninterrupted thoughts and ideas. The document also states that stream of consciousness writing has two techniques - interior monologue, which records thoughts through the first person pronoun, and free indirect style, which renders thoughts in the third person without explicit attribution.
5. * A literary technique that reveals the flow of thoughts
and feelings of characters through long passages of
soliloquy.
In addition to
this point,
William James
gives a
description of
the stream of
consciousness as
a certain
moment in
which a human
mind gets a long
train of thoughts
and ideas
without any
interruption.
Stream of
consciousness,
the continuous
flow of sense,
perception;
thoughts,
feelings, and
memories in the
human mind,
5MA English (3rd) NUML Multan Campus
13. The stream of consciousness is a new style of writing which has two
techniques “Interior Monologue” and “Free Indirect Speech”.
Interior Monologue is a narrative
technique that records thoughts, feelings,
and emotions of the human mind with the
use of the pronoun “I”.
Free Indirect Style rends thoughts as
reported speech (in the third person, past tense)
but keeps to the kind of vocabulary that is
appropriate to the character and deletes some of
the tags, like ‘she thought’, ‘she wondered’, ‘she
asked herself’………………etc.
13MA English (3rd) NUML Multan Campus
28. “There’ll be no landing at the Lighthouse tomorrow,” said Charles Tansley,
clapping his hands together as he stood at the window with her husband.
Surely, he had said enough. She wished they would both leave her and James
alone and go on talking. She looked at him. He was such a miserable The
Window Chapter 1 specimen, the children said, all humps and hollows. He
couldn’t play cricket; he poked; he shuffled. He was a sarcastic brute, Andrew
said. They knew what he liked best — to be for ever walking up and down, up
and down, with Mr Ramsay, and saying who had won this, who had won that,
who was a “first rate man” at Latin verses, who was “brilliant but I think
fundamentally unsound,” who was undoubtedly the “ablest fellow in Balliol,”
who had buried his light temporarily at Bristol or Bedford, but was bound to be
heard of later when his Prolegomena, of which Mr Tansley had the first pages
in proof with him if Mr Ramsay would like to see them, to some branch of
mathematics or philosophy saw the light of day. That ”was what they talked
about. 28MA English (3rd) NUML Multan Campus