This document discusses competitive devaluation and currency wars. It defines competitive devaluation as countries competing to lower their exchange rates to boost domestic industry and exports. While currency interventions can stimulate trade, a "currency war" provides few real economic benefits and can deter investment and trade. The document outlines some political and economic factors driving currency tensions and considers advantages and disadvantages of currency wars.
3. Definition
• Competitive devaluation
– Condition in international affairs where countries
compete against each other to achieve a relatively
low exchange rate for their home currency
• Help their domestic industry.
• Dollar Vs. BRIC
• China, India and Russia, along with Iran and members
of the Shanghai Co-operation Organization took early
steps to use their own currencies for trade, rather than
the dollar.
4. More Political than Economic
• A "currency war" is more of a political than an economic condition.
• Governments frequently intervene in their currency markets. They
increase the money supply to stimulate trade and reduce
unemployment; or they decrease the supply to combat inflation.
• When China keeps the YUAN artificially low versus the U.S. dollar, it
keeps the cost of Chinese goods low in the United States,
contributing to a Trade Imbalance.
• This provides a steep incentive for the United States to retaliate by
lowering its currency as well. Of course, because two countries can
only have one exchange rate, this race to the bottom isn't likely to
benefit either party.
6. After Effects
• Unstable exchange rates can deter international investment,
hence slowing the pace of global economic recovery.
• Currency wars can have secondary Political effects. When
countries are fighting over currency, they're less likely to
agree to bilateral trade. Additionally, currency pressures could
make China less likely to go along with U.S. efforts to contain
Iran or North Korea.
• Unlike real wars, currency wars don't have defined start dates,
but they can be ended with something like peace treaties.
8. • Why Asia saves?
– Major Wars after WWII were fought in Asia
– Major famines have been faced by Asia
9. • Why the US does not?
– No Wars since the 1940s
– Major supplier of arms
– Never seen famines
• Has been a donor to 3rd world countries during famines
10. • Asia Invested Its Surplus In Rainy-day funds
– Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
– Saudi Arabia Investment Authority
– HK Monetary Authority
• Rainy-day Funds Invested In US Treasury Bonds in
order to stay liquid
• Even Before The Debt Crisis Of 2008 , The Wealth
Funds Of China And The Middle East Heavily
Invested In The US Dollar And Treasury Bonds
11. • The US spends the intakes just as quickly
• The spending as a percent of the GDP spiraled
12. • The Money Supply jumped from $ 4.5 Trillion
in 2000 to over $ 8.5 Trillion in 2010
13. • Added spending did not create more jobs
• Created volatility in oil prices
• It drove up US housing prices and created a
huge market for sub-prime mortgages
– Eventually collapsed and brought about a world
wide credit crisis
• Also, it drove up food prices
– Commodity index sky-rocketed
• $ 15 billion in 2003 $ 317 billion in 2008
14. • More money in speculative ventures
– US banks stopped lending to SMEs
• Lending rates are low unlike emerging economies
• Job market suffered & economic revival became difficult
• THEN, Western investors came to Asia
– BRIC felt the first rush
– South Korea, Taiwan also witnessed the same
– Resulted in huge $$ cash flow into the country
• Resulted in huge domestic currency appreciation
– Inflation resulted
» Increased interest rates to contain it
» Resulted in more liquidity from US markets
• Brazil was one of the first few countries to slap a 2%
Tax on Investment on Stocks and Bonds (Not on FDI)
– Both stock markets and the Real nosedived for some time
15. • Though the US Economy was slow, the
emerging economies kept buying US Treasury
bonds and the Dollar to keep it strong
– Prime reason
• Keep the $ strong &
• the oil and commodity prices under control
– Ensured sustained exports to the US
– Ensured lesser volatility in the currency markets
• The US budget deficit kept on increasing
– Huge difference in exports & imports
17. IMPLICATION of CURRENCY WAR
Failure to Cooperate
Countries make export goods
competitive
Protectionism on Trade
Printing of Dollars by Fed
US is Import driven now
20. Positive Implications of Currency
Wars
1. Competitive Devaluation : When a country tries to devalue its currency to increase its international
competitiveness.
2. Economic Growth
If the dollar becomes weaker, exports become cheaper leading to an increase in demand for US exports.
This can help to increase AD and improve the rate of economic growth. This may be important, because
problems in the US housing market are threatening the rate of economic growth. Falling house prices are
potentially reducing consumer spending, therefore, a rise in exports could help to boost economic growth
and prevent any move towards a recession.
3. Balance of Payments
The US has a large current account deficit (7% of GDP) therefore a devaluation will help to improve and
reduce the current account deficit. However, a devaluation alone is unlikely to solve the problem.
4. Inflation
A devaluation may lead to increased inflationary pressures for 3 reasons:
1) Increase in exports causes rising AD and therefore could lead to demand pull inflation.
2) Imported goods will be more expensive. American consumers would definitely experience a rise in price
for many imported manufactured goods and imports of raw materials could increase costs of business.
3) It is argued a devaluation reduces the incentive, for manufacturers and exporters, to cut costs and
become more efficient.
21. 5. Countries need to do it to simply survive at the moment :
The overwhelming fact of the global currency system is that America needs a much
weaker dollar to bring its economy back .
Asian investment in plant has run ahead of Western ability to consume. The debt-
strapped households of Middle America, or Britain and Spain, can no longer drive
their economy. They need the help of Asian nations to do so. Japan to avoid a
deflationary crisis, China to hold together a political order that is more fragile than
it looks.
6. Import and Export Imbalance
A country with a higher valuated currency will get more imports while a country
with a low evaluated currency will export a lot.
The devaluation of consumer market currencies will lead to producer countries
having to improve their domestic consumption and achieve a balance between
export and import.
22. 7. Political Compulsions:
The American political powers cannot go on like this. In a country ravaged by recession and looking
at potential ruin in the face of an increasingly bleak employment situation, it needs to create jobs,
even if it is not the most economically sound thing to do. No government will be able to survive
without it. These new employment opportunities need to be created, if nothing, to pacify and
improve the American populace’s situation.
24. The other view………
Disadvantages Of Currency war
•NOT AN IMMIDIATE SOLUTION (As most people tend to see it as)
o A rapid revaluation will not have a large and immediate positive effect on the American
economy
o Positive effect will be offset, in part if not in whole, by the negative impact on the Chinese
economy
o Rebalancing should take pace gradually, through nominal exchange rate adjustments and
complementary structural adjustments on both sides
•EMPLOYEMENT BUBBLE
o US and the European major economies can sustain the devaluation and drive their own
employment opportunities .
oAs a short term option China will devalue its own Yuan (which would happen otherwise as well) and
go back to the previous situation .
oUS market will be flooded with very cheap Chinese products leading to another downturn in the
economy and loss of all those newly created jobs.
25. • HARM TO BILATERAL TRADE
o Solutions to their problems lie in working together and not in fighting guerilla wars
o A negative impact on bilateral trade
o Hamper the development and implementation of mutually beneficial economic and trade
policies
• POLITICAL RAMIFICATIONS
o World cannot afford a conflict between major powers like US and China.
27. • Issues
– Role of Exchange rates
– Spillover from policy choices
• Within rich world
• Between rich & poor world
– Emerging economies
• Distinguish between permanent & temporary surge in
capital inflows
– In General
• More harmony is required
28. • Issues (cont’d)
– General consensus
• Global rebalancing
– Systematic Analysis of exchange rate adjustments
– Assessment of spillovers in policies
– QE can work beyond exchange rate
• “Avoidance is Bliss”
29. • Major Solution
– Financial Transaction Tax
• Keeps speculation under control
• Curbs Short-time Investors
– Have to pay tax for every exchange
• Long-time investors
– Will only be taxed once