SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 32
Download to read offline
A Test Apparatus For Obtaining
Triaxial Stress-Strain Behavior Of
Foam
By: Mohammed Aldousari
Advisor: Dr. Hoo Fatt
ME Senior Design Project I
4600 461
Department of Mechanical Engineering
The University of Akron
May 14, 2016
1
Abstract:
The design and improvement of the Arcan fixture is the main object of this
project. In order to create a new Arcan from the original design, we must identify the
mechanical properties for the specimen; to do so we built an apparatus for triaxial-shear
stress testing of polymer foam. The modified Arcan fixture will allow for rotation of the
loading axis. This allows us to determine the performance of, and determine likelihood of
failure for the material under multidirectional stress. The modified Arcan fixture is
designed to be inside an air pressure vessel to observe the form behavior. The modified
Arcan fixture is connected to the actuator of the MTS 831 servo-hydraulic testing
machine. In this project it was necessary to design the Arcan fixture, and a pressure
vessel design would be part of a follow-on project. The overall design of the pressure
vessel will be discussed, but a detailed design is not included here. At the end, as a result
of many trials, we developed suitable designs for the modified Arcan fixture. A detailed
investigation of this modified Arcan fixture is discussed.
2
Table of Contents Pg #
Abstract (or Executive summary) 1
Introduction 3
Problem description 3
MTS Machine/Actuator 4
Arcan Fixture and Modifications 5
Universal joint 7
Screw for the holders 8
Butterfly Specimen 9
Finite Element Analysis 13
Conclusion 15
References 16
Appendices 17
3
Introduction:
Arcan test fixtures have been used with polymer foams and other lightweight
materials that compose the core of a sandwich structure, to obtain stress concentrations,
especially for combined normal and shear stress. Here we are interested in modifying the
Arcan fixture to allow for measurement of stress induced in a small cylindrical pressure
vessel as well as to accommodate cyclic stress fields.
The testing method used here involved an MTS machine (shown in Figure 1) that
delivers a linear force of up to 1334.45 N, oriented up and down, with a 25.4 mm range
of travel. A load cell mounted beneath the test sample registers the applied force. The test
section, where the Arcan fixture is pinned to the MTS, is to be placed inside a pressure
vessel, allowing for the sample to be exposed to both multi-axis stress and the applied
linear force from the MTS. Tests in this project should be on the foam Divinycell PCV
H100.
Problem Description:
The traditional fixture (shown in Figure 2) includes a series of holes, each of
which can be pinned to an actuator, allowing for a rotated load axis. With this basic
design, we can modify the orientation of the fixture, enabling testing of the sample at
different angles by pinning the fixture through different pairs of holes. This essentially
allows for different fixtures, each small enough to be encased in a pressure vessel that
will be connected to the MTS. Sealing the Arcan inside the pressure vessel and
connecting it with the actuator is a design challenge that has been considered. In addition,
4
the Arcan fixture must be very small and lightweight to fit in the tank and rest on top of
the load cell and the cost of the whole test setup should be less than $10K.
MTS Machine/Actuator:
An MTS 831 servo-hydraulic testing machine (shown in Figure 1) provides linear
force for this test. The MTS 831 is pinned to the Arcan fixture at top and bottom, via
universal joints, to allow for an applied force to the sample. This applied force can reach
14679.13 N. The actuator has a 431.8 mm range of travel. The MTS actuator is
computer-controlled. A load cell mounted at the base of the MTS measures dynamic
load, and that load cell has a measurement limit of 14679.13 N.
Figure 1
5
Arcan Fixture and Modifications:
The basic Arcan fixture includes a series of holes, each of which can be pinned to
an actuator, allowing for a rotated load axis. With this basic design, we can modify the
orientation of the fixture, enabling testing of the core sample at different angles by
pinning the fixture through different pairs of holes. This essentially allows for different
fixtures, each small enough to be encased in a pressure vessel that delivers fluid pressure.
The original Arcan fixture is too large to use in a small pressure vessel.
The original Arcan fixture design (shown in Figure 2) has been modified here, for
the purpose of examining the simultaneous effects of multidirectional stress (from air
pressure) and axial force (from the actuator). Others have made modifications on the
Arcan design for similar reasons [1].
For the modified Arcan design proposed here, the holes are placed in such a way
that consecutive pairs of holes will amount to a 15-degree orientation difference, moving
from 0 to 90 degrees. With each change in orientation, a new specimen is placed in the
fixture. This enables a change in the angle of actuator force. There are 7 solid modeling
views of the modified Arcan fixture are shown in Appendix 1.
The modified Arcan fixture will be created from 6061 Aluminum, which is
lightweight, inexpensive and easy to machine. This material is also much less subject to
deformation under stress than is the butterfly specimen. As material was removed from
the original Arcan, edges were smoothed and corners rounded to minimize the risk of
unwanted stress concentrations.
6
Figure 2
The Arcan fixture has been updated by removing some of the original material so
as to minimize the space it occupies, knowing that it must fit in a pressure vessel of
limited size, the available space is anticipated to be 152.4 mm diameter. It must,
7
however, be large enough to accommodate connection to a universal joint. Also, the
Arcan was made extra long in its central area to accommodate a bracket to hold the
specimen. In different orientations, different geometries of butterfly specimen will be
mounted with this bracket. Instead of fixing the specimen in place, it can be easily
removed and replaced with another specimen.
Universal joint of Arcan:
In each orientation, the Arcan is pinned at top and bottom to universal joints,
which are in turn connected to the MTS actuator and load cell. The universal joints can
accommodate stress in both tension and compression, and offer degrees of freedom of
motion, reducing risk of failure at the point where the Arcan is pinned. The universal
joint allows for the motion of the actuator inside the pressure vessel.
The universal joint to be used here is McMaster-Carr part number 60645K611, 1
30.16 mm in length and #6-32 thread, as shown in Figure 3.
8
Figure 3: Universal joint
While the original Arcan design is suitable only for tension, this modified design
can be used both for tension and compression. It was necessary to add thickness to the
Arcan fixture to allow for a mating with universal joints. This adds a degree of freedom
in motion, and also enables a change in orientation while still accommodating the
universal joints. For each angle of orientation, excess material was removed to make the
fixture at each orientation as small and lightweight as possible. This strategy also makes
the individual fixtures cheaper to create.
Screw for the holders:
There is a steel screw connected to the bonded tab of the butterfly specimen. It
enables a strong grip between the modified Arcan fixture and the bracket holding the
specimen. The screw is chosen to be strong so that it can maintain its grip through its
threads even while the actuator loads the Arcan. It can also withstand simultaneous axial
9
and shear loads. The holes in the Arcan that were made for the screws were placed in a
flat area so it is easier to install screws, as shown in Appendix 1. A screw's power
depends on how close together the threads are, and how wide the head is, and knowing
this we were able to select a screw for the Arcan.
The screw to be used here is McMaster-Carr part number 91259A162, #6-32
thread, as shown in Figure 4
Figure 4
Butterfly Specimen:
The specimens used are of Divinycell PVC H100, a semi-rigid foam that, when
paired with a high-strength skin, will result in strong, stiff, lightweight sandwich
10
structures [2]. This foam is supplied in large, thick rectangular sheets, and specimens are
cut and shaped from the sheet. There are two specimen types, corresponding to in-plane
and out-of-plane properties. The shear stress acting on the foam was determined to be
720 N, and the normal stress 1575 N.
Figure 5: Butterfly foam specimens:
(a) In-plane specimen and (b) Out-of-plane specimen
The samples (shown in Figure 5) are referred to as a butterfly because of the strong
resemblance. The butterfly shape is ideal for shear and multi-directional loading
10 25
15
R2.54
15
8.07
45°
25
15
15
R2.54
35
45°
(a) 25mm*15mm Front view
Side view
(b) 35mm*25mm
Front view
Side view
11
scenarios [1]. A portion of the foam substance used in testing is cut into such a shape.
During testing, it is possible to identify and measure stresses acting on the specimen, and
to determine failure risk. If the specimen should fail, the stress that causes the failure
(magnitude and direction) is recorded.
Pressure Vessel:
A pressure vessel including two windows is needed to deliver three-dimensional
fluid pressure to the butterfly specimen. This pressure vessel will be off-the-shelf to limit
cost. It should deliver pressure up to 20.68 bar. Since the vessel must be mounted in the
MTS machine, there is a space limitation: the pressure vessel must accommodate one
inch of actuator travel.
The pressure vessel must be chosen so as not to fail when used in conjunction
with the MTS actuator. The pressure vessel is subject to hoop stress (σ=pr/t) and axial
stress (σ=pr/2t). It is also subject to shear and compression stress, as well as air pressure.
An aluminum pressure vessel offers lighter weight and lower cost than steel. Off-
the-shelf pressure vessels will come with caps that can accommodate an observation
window; other openings will be needed to accommodate the MTS actuator rod and load
cell.
The pressure vessel has caps on either end to allow access to the specimen.
Windows in these caps permit light to enter and enable one to observe the specimen
during the test.
12
Stress Analysis of Pressure Vessel:
The pressure vessel to be manufactured from 6061 Aluminum: inexpensive and
simple both to machine and to weld. The following characteristics are to be sought:
• Safety factor of 2.5
• Maximum travel inside of 25.4 mm
• Maximum pressure of 20.68 bar
• Maximum linear force of 14679.13 mm
• Tensile Yield Strength 2757.90 bar
!
!
(𝜎! − 𝜎!)! + (𝜎! − 𝜎!)! + (𝜎! − 𝜎!)!=
!!
!"
The wall thickness was determined from a Von Mises calculation of principal stress:
Where
𝜎!! 𝜎! =
𝑃𝑅
𝑡
𝜎! =
𝑃𝑅
2𝑡
𝜎! = −𝑃 = −20.68
This results in a quadratic equation in wall thickness,
𝑥 =
!!± !!!!!"
!!
and the possible wall thickness is 0.41 mm.
13
Figure 6
Finite Element Analysis:
The finite element analysis here was performed for one orientation of the Arcan
fixture (0 degrees), just to be certain it would not fail under stress. Especially of interest
were holes to accommodate universal joints, and curves in the Arcan structure, because
curves and discontinuities are especially subject to stress concentrations.
Testing revealed that stress even at locations of stress concentration was very low,
far below yield strength even when a safety factor of 10 was considered.
14
Figure 7
The von Mises stress distribution in the Arcan fixture for 10 times the maximum design
loads is shown in Figure 7. The maximum von Mises stress accrued at the hole created
for joint and it is 1.10316 bar. This is much lower than the yield strength at Al 6061,
which is 2757.90 bar.
15
Conclusions:
We have a design for testing the butterfly specimen, under conditions that include
multi-axial stress due to pressure, and shear and compression/tension forces delivered by
a linear actuator. The Arcan fixture has been modified to suit these tests, and will be
pinned to the actuator and to a load cell via universal joints. The butterfly specimen will
be mounted in such a way as to be securely in place during testing, yet easy to remove.
The entire test section will fit inside a pressure vessel, which uses air as its active fluid.
The test setup involves some modification of the Arcan fixture, but the Arcan will
be made from inexpensive and machinable Aluminum, so multiple fixtures can be
generated. An individual fixture can be easily removed and replaced. Butterfly specimens
can be made in large numbers as well, for repeated testing, although stress on the Arcan
fixture will be small and failure would seem to be unlikely in nearly all test cases.
Individual tests call for mounting of butterfly specimens at various angles relative
to the linear actuator force being applied, so the Arcan has been created with a series of
holes separated by 15 degrees, from 0 degrees (aligned with the actuator force) to 90.
16
References:
[1] Taher, S. T., O. T. Thomsen, and J. M. Dulieu-Barton. "Bidirectional Thermo-
Mechanical Properties of Foam Core Materials Using DIC." Thermomechanics and Infra-
Red Imaging, Volume 7 Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental
Mechanics Series (2011): 67-74. Web.
[2] Hoo Fatt, Michelle S., and Linling Chen. "Transversely isotropic mechanical
properties of PVC foam under cyclic loading.” Journal of Material Science (2013): Web.
15 May 2016.
17
Appendix 1
18
Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 0 deg orientation
19
20
Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 15 deg orientation
21
22
Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 30 deg orientation
23
24
Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 45 deg orientation
25
26
Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 60 deg orientation
27
28
Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 75 deg orientation
29
30
Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 90 deg orientation
31

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Unit 3 design against fluctuation load
Unit 3 design against fluctuation loadUnit 3 design against fluctuation load
Unit 3 design against fluctuation load
 
Compression member
Compression memberCompression member
Compression member
 
Effect of connection eccentricity in the behaviour of steel tension members
Effect of connection eccentricity in the behaviour of steel tension membersEffect of connection eccentricity in the behaviour of steel tension members
Effect of connection eccentricity in the behaviour of steel tension members
 
Springs - DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS-II
Springs - DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS-IISprings - DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS-II
Springs - DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS-II
 
Connections
Connections Connections
Connections
 
Unit 5 Design of Threaded and Welded Joints
Unit 5 Design of Threaded and Welded JointsUnit 5 Design of Threaded and Welded Joints
Unit 5 Design of Threaded and Welded Joints
 
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structuresDesign methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structures
 
Compression member
Compression memberCompression member
Compression member
 
Spure gear deging unit 1
Spure gear deging unit 1Spure gear deging unit 1
Spure gear deging unit 1
 
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Work Holding Fixture in a Shaft Bearing Test Rig
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Work Holding Fixture in a Shaft Bearing Test RigIRJET- Design and Analysis of Work Holding Fixture in a Shaft Bearing Test Rig
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Work Holding Fixture in a Shaft Bearing Test Rig
 
Tension members
Tension membersTension members
Tension members
 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Chapter 1
 
Unit 5 threaded joint
Unit 5 threaded jointUnit 5 threaded joint
Unit 5 threaded joint
 
Ch 11 slides_m
Ch 11 slides_mCh 11 slides_m
Ch 11 slides_m
 
Design of an unprotected flange coupling
Design of an unprotected flange couplingDesign of an unprotected flange coupling
Design of an unprotected flange coupling
 
Beam design
Beam designBeam design
Beam design
 
Ak26230233
Ak26230233Ak26230233
Ak26230233
 
Design of machine elements notes by Bhavesh Mhaskar
Design of machine elements notes by Bhavesh Mhaskar Design of machine elements notes by Bhavesh Mhaskar
Design of machine elements notes by Bhavesh Mhaskar
 
design and analysis of cantilever beam ppt
design and analysis of cantilever beam pptdesign and analysis of cantilever beam ppt
design and analysis of cantilever beam ppt
 
Flange Shaft Coupling
Flange Shaft CouplingFlange Shaft Coupling
Flange Shaft Coupling
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Triaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soil
Triaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soilTriaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soil
Triaxial shear test and shear strength properties of soil
 
Mekanika Tanah - Triaxial shear test
Mekanika Tanah - Triaxial shear testMekanika Tanah - Triaxial shear test
Mekanika Tanah - Triaxial shear test
 
Strength nalin
Strength nalinStrength nalin
Strength nalin
 
Class 5 Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 5   Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 5   Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 5 Permeability Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Class 8 Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 8    Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 8    Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 8 Triaxial Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 6    Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 6    Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Consolidation settlement
Consolidation settlementConsolidation settlement
Consolidation settlement
 
Class 7 Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 7    Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 7    Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 7 Consolidation Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 

Similar to Design Mohammed Aldousari

Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor JackFinal Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Mehmet Bariskan
 
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structureDamage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
eSAT Journals
 
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structureDamage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
eSAT Journals
 

Similar to Design Mohammed Aldousari (20)

IRJET-Cyclic Response of Perforated Beam in Steel Column Joints
IRJET-Cyclic Response of Perforated Beam in Steel Column JointsIRJET-Cyclic Response of Perforated Beam in Steel Column Joints
IRJET-Cyclic Response of Perforated Beam in Steel Column Joints
 
Design and Analysis Nose Landing Gear Support
Design and Analysis Nose Landing Gear SupportDesign and Analysis Nose Landing Gear Support
Design and Analysis Nose Landing Gear Support
 
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT UNSTIFFENED BOLTS ARRANGEMENT OF END-PLATE MO...
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT UNSTIFFENED BOLTS ARRANGEMENT OF END-PLATE MO...NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT UNSTIFFENED BOLTS ARRANGEMENT OF END-PLATE MO...
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT UNSTIFFENED BOLTS ARRANGEMENT OF END-PLATE MO...
 
Buckling Analysis of Torispherical Head Pressure Vessel Using Finite Element ...
Buckling Analysis of Torispherical Head Pressure Vessel Using Finite Element ...Buckling Analysis of Torispherical Head Pressure Vessel Using Finite Element ...
Buckling Analysis of Torispherical Head Pressure Vessel Using Finite Element ...
 
1228808532(2)
1228808532(2)1228808532(2)
1228808532(2)
 
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor JackFinal Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
Final Project_ Design and FEM Analysis of Scissor Jack
 
Bs 1881 121 1983
Bs 1881 121 1983Bs 1881 121 1983
Bs 1881 121 1983
 
[IJET V2I5P14] Authors: Miss Kirti. S. Kakade, Prof. P. A. Narwade
[IJET V2I5P14] Authors: Miss Kirti. S. Kakade, Prof. P. A. Narwade[IJET V2I5P14] Authors: Miss Kirti. S. Kakade, Prof. P. A. Narwade
[IJET V2I5P14] Authors: Miss Kirti. S. Kakade, Prof. P. A. Narwade
 
2-Compression.pdf
2-Compression.pdf2-Compression.pdf
2-Compression.pdf
 
behavior of reterofitted steel structures using cost effective retrofitting t...
behavior of reterofitted steel structures using cost effective retrofitting t...behavior of reterofitted steel structures using cost effective retrofitting t...
behavior of reterofitted steel structures using cost effective retrofitting t...
 
C496
C496C496
C496
 
Seismic optimization of an I shaped shear link damper in EBF and CBF systems
Seismic optimization of an I shaped shear link damper in EBF and CBF systemsSeismic optimization of an I shaped shear link damper in EBF and CBF systems
Seismic optimization of an I shaped shear link damper in EBF and CBF systems
 
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structureDamage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
 
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structureDamage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
Damage tolerance study of honeycomb sandwich structure
 
final404report
final404reportfinal404report
final404report
 
Contact Pressure Validation of Steam Turbine Casing for Static Loading Condition
Contact Pressure Validation of Steam Turbine Casing for Static Loading ConditionContact Pressure Validation of Steam Turbine Casing for Static Loading Condition
Contact Pressure Validation of Steam Turbine Casing for Static Loading Condition
 
IRJET - Analysis of Rivet Joint for Application of Substation
IRJET - Analysis of Rivet Joint for Application of SubstationIRJET - Analysis of Rivet Joint for Application of Substation
IRJET - Analysis of Rivet Joint for Application of Substation
 
Sequence Modeling and Calculations in the Design of Revolving Clamp Assembly
Sequence Modeling and Calculations in the Design of Revolving Clamp AssemblySequence Modeling and Calculations in the Design of Revolving Clamp Assembly
Sequence Modeling and Calculations in the Design of Revolving Clamp Assembly
 
pro/e
pro/epro/e
pro/e
 
IRJET - Analysis and Designing of Diaphragm Spring Washers
IRJET -  	  Analysis and Designing of Diaphragm Spring WashersIRJET -  	  Analysis and Designing of Diaphragm Spring Washers
IRJET - Analysis and Designing of Diaphragm Spring Washers
 

Design Mohammed Aldousari

  • 1. A Test Apparatus For Obtaining Triaxial Stress-Strain Behavior Of Foam By: Mohammed Aldousari Advisor: Dr. Hoo Fatt ME Senior Design Project I 4600 461 Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Akron May 14, 2016
  • 2. 1 Abstract: The design and improvement of the Arcan fixture is the main object of this project. In order to create a new Arcan from the original design, we must identify the mechanical properties for the specimen; to do so we built an apparatus for triaxial-shear stress testing of polymer foam. The modified Arcan fixture will allow for rotation of the loading axis. This allows us to determine the performance of, and determine likelihood of failure for the material under multidirectional stress. The modified Arcan fixture is designed to be inside an air pressure vessel to observe the form behavior. The modified Arcan fixture is connected to the actuator of the MTS 831 servo-hydraulic testing machine. In this project it was necessary to design the Arcan fixture, and a pressure vessel design would be part of a follow-on project. The overall design of the pressure vessel will be discussed, but a detailed design is not included here. At the end, as a result of many trials, we developed suitable designs for the modified Arcan fixture. A detailed investigation of this modified Arcan fixture is discussed.
  • 3. 2 Table of Contents Pg # Abstract (or Executive summary) 1 Introduction 3 Problem description 3 MTS Machine/Actuator 4 Arcan Fixture and Modifications 5 Universal joint 7 Screw for the holders 8 Butterfly Specimen 9 Finite Element Analysis 13 Conclusion 15 References 16 Appendices 17
  • 4. 3 Introduction: Arcan test fixtures have been used with polymer foams and other lightweight materials that compose the core of a sandwich structure, to obtain stress concentrations, especially for combined normal and shear stress. Here we are interested in modifying the Arcan fixture to allow for measurement of stress induced in a small cylindrical pressure vessel as well as to accommodate cyclic stress fields. The testing method used here involved an MTS machine (shown in Figure 1) that delivers a linear force of up to 1334.45 N, oriented up and down, with a 25.4 mm range of travel. A load cell mounted beneath the test sample registers the applied force. The test section, where the Arcan fixture is pinned to the MTS, is to be placed inside a pressure vessel, allowing for the sample to be exposed to both multi-axis stress and the applied linear force from the MTS. Tests in this project should be on the foam Divinycell PCV H100. Problem Description: The traditional fixture (shown in Figure 2) includes a series of holes, each of which can be pinned to an actuator, allowing for a rotated load axis. With this basic design, we can modify the orientation of the fixture, enabling testing of the sample at different angles by pinning the fixture through different pairs of holes. This essentially allows for different fixtures, each small enough to be encased in a pressure vessel that will be connected to the MTS. Sealing the Arcan inside the pressure vessel and connecting it with the actuator is a design challenge that has been considered. In addition,
  • 5. 4 the Arcan fixture must be very small and lightweight to fit in the tank and rest on top of the load cell and the cost of the whole test setup should be less than $10K. MTS Machine/Actuator: An MTS 831 servo-hydraulic testing machine (shown in Figure 1) provides linear force for this test. The MTS 831 is pinned to the Arcan fixture at top and bottom, via universal joints, to allow for an applied force to the sample. This applied force can reach 14679.13 N. The actuator has a 431.8 mm range of travel. The MTS actuator is computer-controlled. A load cell mounted at the base of the MTS measures dynamic load, and that load cell has a measurement limit of 14679.13 N. Figure 1
  • 6. 5 Arcan Fixture and Modifications: The basic Arcan fixture includes a series of holes, each of which can be pinned to an actuator, allowing for a rotated load axis. With this basic design, we can modify the orientation of the fixture, enabling testing of the core sample at different angles by pinning the fixture through different pairs of holes. This essentially allows for different fixtures, each small enough to be encased in a pressure vessel that delivers fluid pressure. The original Arcan fixture is too large to use in a small pressure vessel. The original Arcan fixture design (shown in Figure 2) has been modified here, for the purpose of examining the simultaneous effects of multidirectional stress (from air pressure) and axial force (from the actuator). Others have made modifications on the Arcan design for similar reasons [1]. For the modified Arcan design proposed here, the holes are placed in such a way that consecutive pairs of holes will amount to a 15-degree orientation difference, moving from 0 to 90 degrees. With each change in orientation, a new specimen is placed in the fixture. This enables a change in the angle of actuator force. There are 7 solid modeling views of the modified Arcan fixture are shown in Appendix 1. The modified Arcan fixture will be created from 6061 Aluminum, which is lightweight, inexpensive and easy to machine. This material is also much less subject to deformation under stress than is the butterfly specimen. As material was removed from the original Arcan, edges were smoothed and corners rounded to minimize the risk of unwanted stress concentrations.
  • 7. 6 Figure 2 The Arcan fixture has been updated by removing some of the original material so as to minimize the space it occupies, knowing that it must fit in a pressure vessel of limited size, the available space is anticipated to be 152.4 mm diameter. It must,
  • 8. 7 however, be large enough to accommodate connection to a universal joint. Also, the Arcan was made extra long in its central area to accommodate a bracket to hold the specimen. In different orientations, different geometries of butterfly specimen will be mounted with this bracket. Instead of fixing the specimen in place, it can be easily removed and replaced with another specimen. Universal joint of Arcan: In each orientation, the Arcan is pinned at top and bottom to universal joints, which are in turn connected to the MTS actuator and load cell. The universal joints can accommodate stress in both tension and compression, and offer degrees of freedom of motion, reducing risk of failure at the point where the Arcan is pinned. The universal joint allows for the motion of the actuator inside the pressure vessel. The universal joint to be used here is McMaster-Carr part number 60645K611, 1 30.16 mm in length and #6-32 thread, as shown in Figure 3.
  • 9. 8 Figure 3: Universal joint While the original Arcan design is suitable only for tension, this modified design can be used both for tension and compression. It was necessary to add thickness to the Arcan fixture to allow for a mating with universal joints. This adds a degree of freedom in motion, and also enables a change in orientation while still accommodating the universal joints. For each angle of orientation, excess material was removed to make the fixture at each orientation as small and lightweight as possible. This strategy also makes the individual fixtures cheaper to create. Screw for the holders: There is a steel screw connected to the bonded tab of the butterfly specimen. It enables a strong grip between the modified Arcan fixture and the bracket holding the specimen. The screw is chosen to be strong so that it can maintain its grip through its threads even while the actuator loads the Arcan. It can also withstand simultaneous axial
  • 10. 9 and shear loads. The holes in the Arcan that were made for the screws were placed in a flat area so it is easier to install screws, as shown in Appendix 1. A screw's power depends on how close together the threads are, and how wide the head is, and knowing this we were able to select a screw for the Arcan. The screw to be used here is McMaster-Carr part number 91259A162, #6-32 thread, as shown in Figure 4 Figure 4 Butterfly Specimen: The specimens used are of Divinycell PVC H100, a semi-rigid foam that, when paired with a high-strength skin, will result in strong, stiff, lightweight sandwich
  • 11. 10 structures [2]. This foam is supplied in large, thick rectangular sheets, and specimens are cut and shaped from the sheet. There are two specimen types, corresponding to in-plane and out-of-plane properties. The shear stress acting on the foam was determined to be 720 N, and the normal stress 1575 N. Figure 5: Butterfly foam specimens: (a) In-plane specimen and (b) Out-of-plane specimen The samples (shown in Figure 5) are referred to as a butterfly because of the strong resemblance. The butterfly shape is ideal for shear and multi-directional loading 10 25 15 R2.54 15 8.07 45° 25 15 15 R2.54 35 45° (a) 25mm*15mm Front view Side view (b) 35mm*25mm Front view Side view
  • 12. 11 scenarios [1]. A portion of the foam substance used in testing is cut into such a shape. During testing, it is possible to identify and measure stresses acting on the specimen, and to determine failure risk. If the specimen should fail, the stress that causes the failure (magnitude and direction) is recorded. Pressure Vessel: A pressure vessel including two windows is needed to deliver three-dimensional fluid pressure to the butterfly specimen. This pressure vessel will be off-the-shelf to limit cost. It should deliver pressure up to 20.68 bar. Since the vessel must be mounted in the MTS machine, there is a space limitation: the pressure vessel must accommodate one inch of actuator travel. The pressure vessel must be chosen so as not to fail when used in conjunction with the MTS actuator. The pressure vessel is subject to hoop stress (σ=pr/t) and axial stress (σ=pr/2t). It is also subject to shear and compression stress, as well as air pressure. An aluminum pressure vessel offers lighter weight and lower cost than steel. Off- the-shelf pressure vessels will come with caps that can accommodate an observation window; other openings will be needed to accommodate the MTS actuator rod and load cell. The pressure vessel has caps on either end to allow access to the specimen. Windows in these caps permit light to enter and enable one to observe the specimen during the test.
  • 13. 12 Stress Analysis of Pressure Vessel: The pressure vessel to be manufactured from 6061 Aluminum: inexpensive and simple both to machine and to weld. The following characteristics are to be sought: • Safety factor of 2.5 • Maximum travel inside of 25.4 mm • Maximum pressure of 20.68 bar • Maximum linear force of 14679.13 mm • Tensile Yield Strength 2757.90 bar ! ! (𝜎! − 𝜎!)! + (𝜎! − 𝜎!)! + (𝜎! − 𝜎!)!= !! !" The wall thickness was determined from a Von Mises calculation of principal stress: Where 𝜎!! 𝜎! = 𝑃𝑅 𝑡 𝜎! = 𝑃𝑅 2𝑡 𝜎! = −𝑃 = −20.68 This results in a quadratic equation in wall thickness, 𝑥 = !!± !!!!!" !! and the possible wall thickness is 0.41 mm.
  • 14. 13 Figure 6 Finite Element Analysis: The finite element analysis here was performed for one orientation of the Arcan fixture (0 degrees), just to be certain it would not fail under stress. Especially of interest were holes to accommodate universal joints, and curves in the Arcan structure, because curves and discontinuities are especially subject to stress concentrations. Testing revealed that stress even at locations of stress concentration was very low, far below yield strength even when a safety factor of 10 was considered.
  • 15. 14 Figure 7 The von Mises stress distribution in the Arcan fixture for 10 times the maximum design loads is shown in Figure 7. The maximum von Mises stress accrued at the hole created for joint and it is 1.10316 bar. This is much lower than the yield strength at Al 6061, which is 2757.90 bar.
  • 16. 15 Conclusions: We have a design for testing the butterfly specimen, under conditions that include multi-axial stress due to pressure, and shear and compression/tension forces delivered by a linear actuator. The Arcan fixture has been modified to suit these tests, and will be pinned to the actuator and to a load cell via universal joints. The butterfly specimen will be mounted in such a way as to be securely in place during testing, yet easy to remove. The entire test section will fit inside a pressure vessel, which uses air as its active fluid. The test setup involves some modification of the Arcan fixture, but the Arcan will be made from inexpensive and machinable Aluminum, so multiple fixtures can be generated. An individual fixture can be easily removed and replaced. Butterfly specimens can be made in large numbers as well, for repeated testing, although stress on the Arcan fixture will be small and failure would seem to be unlikely in nearly all test cases. Individual tests call for mounting of butterfly specimens at various angles relative to the linear actuator force being applied, so the Arcan has been created with a series of holes separated by 15 degrees, from 0 degrees (aligned with the actuator force) to 90.
  • 17. 16 References: [1] Taher, S. T., O. T. Thomsen, and J. M. Dulieu-Barton. "Bidirectional Thermo- Mechanical Properties of Foam Core Materials Using DIC." Thermomechanics and Infra- Red Imaging, Volume 7 Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series (2011): 67-74. Web. [2] Hoo Fatt, Michelle S., and Linling Chen. "Transversely isotropic mechanical properties of PVC foam under cyclic loading.” Journal of Material Science (2013): Web. 15 May 2016.
  • 19. 18 Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 0 deg orientation
  • 20. 19
  • 21. 20 Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 15 deg orientation
  • 22. 21
  • 23. 22 Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 30 deg orientation
  • 24. 23
  • 25. 24 Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 45 deg orientation
  • 26. 25
  • 27. 26 Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 60 deg orientation
  • 28. 27
  • 29. 28 Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 75 deg orientation
  • 30. 29
  • 31. 30 Engineering drawings of modified Arcan structure, 90 deg orientation
  • 32. 31