This document provides guidance on various considerations for science writing and publishing, including authorship criteria, author order, abstract length, image reuse policies, NIH public access policies, dissertation embargoes, evaluating journal reputation, and useful tools. It discusses the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' four authorship criteria and factors to consider when determining author order such as field, degree of involvement, and career timing. It also summarizes policies on abstract length, requesting permission to reuse images, complying with the NIH public access policy, and dissertation embargoes. The document provides red flags for identifying predatory journals or publishers.
4. ICMJE Authorship Criteria
Substantial
contributions to the
conception or design
of the work; or the
acquisition, analysis,
or interpretation of
data for the work;
AND
Drafting the work or
revising it critically for
important intellectual
content; AND
Final approval of the
version to be
published; AND
Agreement to be
accountable for all
aspects of the work
in ensuring that
questions related to
the accuracy or
integrity of any part
of the work are
appropriately
investigated and
resolved.
6. Deciding Author Order
• “Sequence-determines-credit” (SDC)
– Declining importance of contribution
Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for
contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(1):e18.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018. PMCID: PMC1769438
7. Deciding Author Order
• “Equal contribution” (EC)
– Alphabetical sequence to acknowledge similar
contributions or to avoid disharmony in
collaborating groups
9. Deciding Author Order
• “Percent-contribution-indicated” (PCI)
– Trend to detail each author's contribution
– Ex: MB carried out the molecular genetic studies and drafted the
manuscript. SB carried out the immunoassays. AR participated in
the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. FG
conceived, designed, and coordinated the study, and helped to draft
the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
14. Abstract Length
• Prior publication
• 250 words
“A manuscript containing information
published in any compiled printed (eg,
symposia, proceedings, newsletters) or
electronic (eg, websites, CD-ROMs,
blogs) format may be rejected on the
grounds of prior publication. Publication of
abstracts less than 250 words long does
not constitute prior publication; however,
publication of longer abstracts may.”
15. Reusing Images
• Copyright transfer
• “Request Permissions” link
• RightsLink
• If you’re unsure, request permission.
17. Reusing Images
• RightsLink (Copyright Clearance
Center)
• Used by most large publishers
• Some publishers generate their own
permissions requests
• Often provides immediate written
permission
• If a fee is charged (rarely) for reuse, a
price estimate is provided
22. NIH Public Access Policy
• PubMed Central Submission Methods
– Journal Submits
• Up to 1 yr to comply
• 2,124 journals
– Author Submits
23. NIH Public Access Policy
• Author add paper to PubMed Central
– NIH Manuscript Submission System (NIHMS)
– Accepted (NOT published) paper
https://publicaccess.nih.gov/Methods-C-D-BP
24. NIH Public Access Policy
• NIH grant proposals
– References & Biosketches
• PMCID #
• PMCID - PMID - Manuscript ID - DOI
Converter
– http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/pmctopmid/
26. Journal/Publisher Reputation
• Positive Indicators
– Scope well-defined, clearly stated
– Editor, editorial board=recognized experts in
field
– Affiliated with established scholarly society or
academic institution
– Fees/charges easily found, clearly explained
27. Journal/Publisher Reputation
• Positive indicators
– Articles have DOIs
– Indicates rights for use & re-use of content @
article level
– Listed in Directory of Open Access Journals
(doaj.org)
28. Journal/Publisher Reputation
• Negative Indicators
– Web site difficult to locate/identify
– Scope statement absent or vague
– Instructions to authors not available
29. Journal/Publisher Reputation
• Negative indicators
– Information on peer review & copyright absent
or unclear
– Repeat lead authors in same issue
Fernandez P. Indicators of journal quality. http://libguides.utk.edu/c.php?g=188817&p=1245184.
Accessed 02/04/2015.
30. Dear Dr. Marcy Souza,
Greetings!
We know being an eminent personality you must be busy with your prior commitments in respect to which you
couldn't reply to our e-mail.
We just want to be sure that you have received our previous mail regarding invitation for you to be Speaker
for our "American Veterinary Congress" (American Veterinary-2015) during August 31-September 2, 2015
at Florida, USA and would like to know your consent regarding same. For more information kindly go through
the link: http://americanveterinary.omicsgroup.com/
We hope you are reviewing the invitation and would make your presence at our event.
Waiting to hear from you soon. Acknowledgement of the mail would highly be appreciated.
With best regards,
Lisa
Program Manager
American veterinary-2015
Life Science Conference
5716 Corsa Ave, Suite 110
Westlake, Los Angeles
CA-91362-7354, USA
Phone +1-650-268-9744
Fax +1-650-618-1414
Toll No +1-800-216-6499
Westlake Village
Los Angeles County
Ph: Mobile in Pescadero, CA (350 mi. from LA)