2. Learning objectives
• Describe different types of distal radial fractures
• List indication for operative and nonoperative treatment
• Outline surgical approaches for the fixation of distal radial
fractures
• Choose appropriate implants according to fracture type
3. Distal radial fractures—the problem
• Most common fracture of all ages
• Many different injuries
• A spectrum from simple to complex
• High energy
• Younger
population
• Shortening and
collapse
• Carpal
instability
• Minimally
displaced
• Extraarticular
fractures
• Impacted stable
fractures
• Low energy
• Poor bone stock
• Elderly population
4. Distal radial fractures—the problem
• Multiple treatment options
• Typically poor literature
• American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery’s (AAOS) Clinical
Practice Guideline Summary:
29 recommendations—5 moderate; 7 weak; 14 inconclusive
• Leads to controversy
12. Type A
Extraarticular
2R3A AA
Type B
Partial articular
2R3B
)
Type C
Complete articular
2R3C
A1 Extraarticular A2 Tranverse, dorsal or volar A3 Wedge intact, fragmentary
multifragmentary
B1 Sagittal B2 Dorsal rim fractures B3 Volar rim fractures
C1 Simple articular and
metaphyseal, saggital and
coronal
C2 Simple articular
metaphyseal multifragmentary
sagital, coronal and extending
to diaphysis
C3 Multifragmentory articular,
simple or multifragmentory
metaphyseal
13. Who needs surgery?
Most distal radial fractures do NOT need an operation:
• Nondisplaced fractures
• Very low-demand patients
• Geriatric patients
14. Who needs surgery?—absolute indications for surgery
Some distal radial fractures must have an operation:
• Open fracture
• Acute carpal tunnel syndrome
15. Who needs surgery?—relative indications
• Failure of closed reduction
• Failure to adequately reduce the fracture
• Difficult to treat the patient with a cast
16. What is an adequate reduction?
• Intraarticular step-off: < 2 mm
• Radial shortening: < 3 mm
• Dorsal tilt: < 10° dorsal
• Radial inclination: > 15°
• Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) incongruity: < 1–2 mm
17. Treatment options
• Closed reduction and application of cast
• Closed reduction, insertion of percutaneous pins, and
application of cast
• Closed reduction and application of external fixator
• Open reduction and application of plate
• Combination of methods
18. Operative treatment of distal radial fractures—
decision making
• Evaluate patient’s functional
demand
• Do a neurological exam
(median nerve?)
• Traction film?
20. Closed reduction and cast
• Undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures
• Most children's fractures
• Extraarticular fractures in elderly that can be reduced
22. AAOS recommendations
• No method of fixation can be recommended over another
• “There is no Level-I clinical evidence suggesting a superior
modality for treatment of distal radial fractures.”
24. External fixation
• Minimally invasive
• Reduction is achieved by distraction
• Joint often cannot be reconstructed
• Intraarticular “Die Punch" cannot be reduced
• Impossible to initiate early motion
28. Open reduction and plating
• Goals of treatment:
• Achieve an anatomical reduction of the joint
• Sufficient stability to allow early range of motion (ROM)
• Volar approach is most commonly used even with dorsal
comminution
34. Complications
Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radial
fracture with a palmar locking plate:
• Overall complication rates 20–27%
• Flexor and extensor tendon irritation
• Loss of fixation
35. Distal radial fractures—plating through a dorsal approach
• Default approach is anterior
• Exceptions:
• Need to see in the joint Dorsal
• Dorsal shear Dorsal
• Radial styloid 1st dorsal
36.
37. Move away from dorsal plating
Dorsal plates have a higher incidence of tendon complications
versus volar plates
38. Move away from dorsal plating
Dorsal plates have a higher incidence of tendon complications
versus volar plates
40. Functional outcome
• Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus external fixation
• Cast versus ORIF in elderly
• Open reduction and internal fixation better radiographic outcome,
early range improvement
• Differences in range of motion not sustained
41. Take-home messages
• Important to understand anatomy
• Get more information—traction views? CT scans
• Multiple treatment options—consider the patient’s needs and
your skills
• There is no level-1 evidence to support any treatment modality
42. Take-home messages
• Surgical indications
• Intraarticular step-off: 2 mm
• Radial shortening: > 3 mm
• Dorsal tilt: > 10°
• If you elect to use ORIF, beware of:
• Tendons
• Anterior radiocarpal ligaments
• Check DRUJ!