SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 47
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle’s Initial Response to
Topic 606 & IFRS 15,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Stephen Thompson, KPMG
Seamus Moran, Oracle Financials Development
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Content
Steve Thompson will discuss compliance with the standard and issues in
transitioning to it.
Seamus Moran will discuss Oracle’s product response
Fusion Revenue Management
Fusion & eBusiness Suite
Peoplesoft Contracts
JD Edwards Contracts
WE HELP
you realize its potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
The New US GAAP
and IFRS Revenue
Recognition Standard
Stephen Thompson
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
4
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
– Replaces all current rules, including industry and transaction-specific standards
– Converges US GAAP and IFRS revenue recognition practices
– Principles-based standard will require more judgment in reaching conclusions
– Greater use of estimates
– Complex transition requirements
NEW REVENUE RECOGNITION RULES
Effective date for public entities
with December 31 year ends.
Nonpublic entities have a one
year deferral in effective date.
201820162013 2014 20172015
January 1st
Retrospective
transition
application date
January 1st
Effective date
May 28, 2014
Final standard
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
5
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
●
Sweeping changes in the way revenue is recognized by companies…
●
New information requirements requiring significant system and process changes…
●
Opportunity to reevaluate accounting policies, processes, systems and technology …to achieve improvement in all
aspects of the revenue cycle, drive efficiencies and increase value add to the business…
Opportunity to achieve
improvement in all
aspects of the revenue
cycle to drive efficiencies
and increase value add
to the business…
Accounting Changes
Financial and Operations
Process Changes
Revenue Recognition Automation
and ERP Upgrades
Governance and Change
NEW REVENUE RECOGNITION RULES, NOT ONLY A CHALLENGE
BUT ALSO AN OPPORTUNITY…
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
6
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
Business
■ Impact on business practices
■ Budget and management reporting
■ Communication with financial markets
■ Covenant compliance
■ Opportunity to rethink business practice
■ Coordination with other strategic initiatives
Systems and Processes
■ Impact on ERP system
■ General ledger, subledgers and reporting packages
■ Supporting transition process
■ New processes
■ SOX compliance
●
Change Management
●
Project management
●
Impact on internal resources
■ Training (accounting, sales, etc.)
■ Revenue change management team
■ Multi-national locations
Accounting, Tax, and Reporting
■ Accounting policies
■ Historical results and transition
■ Reporting differences
■ Disclosure of expected impact
■ Tax reporting
■ Tax planning
For many companies, implementation of the new revenue recognition standard is more than an accounting
exercise, as many different groups will need to be involved.
BROAD-BASED ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACT
Revenue
Recognition
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
7
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
EXAMPLE REVENUE RECOGNITION CHANGES
Existing Standards New Standard
100+ sources for revenue guidance 1 standard for all arrangements, all industries
Must have “persuasive evidence” of arrangement Must have “legally binding” arrangement
Fees must be fixed & determinable Fees are estimated if sufficient history exists
No recognition of contingent revenue No similar prohibition; subject to estimation
Unit of account based on “standalone value” Unit of account based on “distinct”
No rules on accounting for modifications Modification rules can result in complicated acctg.
Software industry held to higher standard (“VSOE”) Software guidance eliminated
IP license recognized upfront or ratable based on practice IP license subject to specific rules on how to recognize
Capitalizing contract acquisition costs optional Capitalizing contract acquisition costs required
Revenue disclosures limited to policy discussion Extensive disclosures required
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
8
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
CHOICE OF TRANSITION METHOD IMPACTS IMPLEMENTATION
Evaluate Existing Contracts for
Cumulative Effect Adjustment
Timeline is based on requirements applicable to a public entity with December 31 year end. Nonpublic entities
may defer application of standard for one year beyond public entity effective date.
2012 and prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 and beyond
CumulativeEffect
Method
Retrospective
Method
Maintain Existing Systems and Processes for Legacy GAAP Reporting Dual reporting
capability
Dual reporting capability
Evaluate Existing Contracts for
Cumulative Effect Adjustment
Maintain New Systems and Processes
Maintain New Systems and Processes
Maintain Existing Systems and Processes for Legacy GAAP Reporting
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
9
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
ALLOCATING TRANSACTION PRICES: SYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS
We are seeing many companies who have not already automated
revenue allocation looking to use this as an opportunity to fix that
Automation of multiple element accounting
●
Address manually (Excel ®, other)
●
Address with bolt-on third party revenue accounting automation tools
Historical approach:
Opportunity
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
10
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
Before designing the right system solution, an assessment needs to be performed; best practice approach is as follows:
ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
Accounting diagnostic
Technology and Broader Impact
Evaluation
Process and information gap
analysis
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6
Transition Option Assessment
●
Accounting policy
●
Disclosure
requirements
●
Contract reviews
Accounting
Diagnostic
●
Identify information
requirements
●
Identify information
and process gaps
●
Map to existing
sources
Process and
information gap
analysis
●
Identify potential
impact on IT, tax ,
controls, ops, FP&A,
investor relations,
etc.
Technology and
Broader Impacts
●
Determine potential
impact of each
option to financials
and business
●
Assess readiness to
elect each transition
option
Transition Option
Assessment
Illustrative timeline for assessment phase:
© 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms
affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510
11
WE HELP
you realize its
potential
THEY SAY
the future
is here
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
Potential Scenarios:
Low impact
Moderate impact
High impact
Retrospective adopterKey:  Acctg. Assessment  Implementation  Design  Implement  Sustain
Roadmap
Assess ImplementDesign Sustain
“Business
as usual”
2014 2015 2016 2017
Optional retrospective
reporting period
Timeline intended to be illustrative only.
Preparation of a timeline for a specific company will require making
educated decisions based on specific facts and circumstances.
May 28, 2014: New revenue recognition
standard issued
Effective date for public calendar
year company
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle Product Response
Seamus Moran, Financials Development
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Safe Harbor Statement
The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for
information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a
commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied
upon in making purchasing decisions. The development, release, and timing of any
features or functionality described for Oracle’s products remains at the sole discretion of
Oracle.
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15
Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective
Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features
Transition Arrangements
Peoplesoft & JD Edwards
Where we are on the timeline
1
2
3
4
5
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Fusion Revenue Management Cloud Service
Generally
Available
Release 8
(US GAAP)
Revenue
Management
21 Customers
provided
development and
design feedback
Over 1,000
hours testing
7 Usability
sessions
Week Long
validation session
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Understanding the Standard: Old versus New
Mandate: Don’t recognize Revenue until all delivered Mandate: Recognize Revenue once performed
Deferred
Revenue is a
sales invoice
you are
feeding to
the P&L
Contract
Liability is a
performance
obligation
you have not
delivered on
UBR are
receivables
you haven’t
billed yet
Contract
Assets
are not
Receivables,
and you
might even
have
billed
already
Revenue and
Deferred
Revenue are
valued at
invoice value
Plus or minus
Carve-ins and
carve outs
Revenue and
Contract
Balances are
valued at
Performance
Obligation
value per Step
Four
VSOE, TPE, Estimate = Fair Value OSSP, ESP = Expected Consideration
Multiple Element
Arrangement
Contract
With Customers
Elements
Units of Account
Distinct
Performance
Obligations
The
Constrain
t
Revenue
Schedule
Performanc
e
Satisfaction
Specific USA
Industries
All Commercial
Customers
Bill, then defer Four steps to valuation, then book that
Follow the
carve out
Follow
Customer
satisfaction
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Scope – Topic 606 & IFRS 15
• Topic 606/IFRS 15
compliance
• Billing and revenue
reconciliation
• Open Obligations
• Unaccounted
• Liabilities
• Assets
Reporting
1. Identify
Contracts with
Customers from
multiple sources
2. Identify
Performance
Obligations
Obligations
3. Calculate Transaction
Price
4. Allocate Transaction
Price to Obligations
•. Establish SSPs & ESPs
•. Relative Allocation
Revenue Value
5. Recognize Revenue
•. At Performance
Obligation Valuation
•. Contract Liabilities
•. Contract Assets
•. Transfer/satisfaction
•. Satisfaction forecast
•. Related Accounting
Revenue
Recognition
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Fusion Revenue Management Outline: A Framework
Sources for Performance
Obligations
Fusion Revenue Management Output &
Accounting
Order Management (OM)
Provide
Contract,
Satisfaction,
Billing,
Customer,
Product
& other
relevant
data
1. Identify Contracts with
Customers over different source
data
2. Identify performance obligations,
categorize as performed or not
3. Value the Contracts
4. Value the Performance
Obligations using relative SSP,
ESP, etc.
5. Record Revenue, Contract
Liabilities and Contract Assets
using Performance Obligations
and their valuations.
Reporting:
• Contract &
Obligation
Reporting
• Revenue, Billing &
Obligation
Reconciliation
• Performance
forecast
Account Receivables (AR)
Project Management (PA)
Contracts
Pricing
Advanced Pricing
CRM
Shipping
Support Accounting:
• Publish data to
accounting engines
(eg SLA)
• Activity and
Balances
Other Products
Custom, Excel, Non-Oracle
et cetera
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Fusion Revenue Management Overview
Business Scenario
Software License
Support
Consulting
Software License
Support
Consulting
Transaction
Price
100
20
80
200
Customer Bill
Software License
Support
Consulting
Transaction
Total
100
20
80
200
Performance Obligations
Invoice
Revenue
Values
OSSP/ESP
98
26
76
200
Software License
Support
Consulting
Total
98.00
8.66
16.00
28.67
Performance Satisfaction Forecast
Period I Period II
0.00
8.67
20.00
122.66 48.67
Period III
0.00
8.67
40.00
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
The 5 Steps are the Data Capture - Revenue Accounting is
based on Performance Obligation ID & Valuation
Search through
“order lines”
from many
sources & Link
ID distinct
performance
obligation from
“order lines”
Establish linked
transaction
price &
constraint
Apply relative
observed SSP
or ESP
Revenue Bookkeeping
Source Detail
Contract
ID
Performance
Obligation
Amount
To Bill
Revenue
Amount
PO Xfr
(from) / to
PA Performance obligation 1000
1000-10
-
4,000 (1,000)
OM Performance obligation 1000 5,000
Alien Performance obligation 1000 1000-20 1,000 2,000 1,000
OM Performance obligation 1100 1100-30 3,000 2,800 (200)
Excel Performance obligation 1100 1100-40 2,500 2,700 200
PA Performance obligation 1100 1100-50 2,350 2,350
-
OM Performance obligation 1200 1200-60 4,000 4,000
-
OM Performance obligation 1200 1200-70 1,800 1,800
-
Recognize
Revenue
Recognize CL
Recognize CA
E.G.
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15
Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective
Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features
Transition Arrangements
Peoplesoft & JD Edwards
Where we are on the timeline
1
2
3
4
5
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Co-Existence Functional Architecture
On the Cloud (or on premise)
Audit & Analyze
1.Identify & 3. Value Contracts
from many sources
•.Establish SSP & ESP
2.Identify & 4. Value
Performance Obligations
Create Accounting
• Separate revenue / billing
• Value @ Perf. Obligation
• Satisfaction –ratable,
immediate, pending;
Satisfaction forecasts
• Generate revenue and
contract asset & liability
balances entries using
Performance Obligation
valuation
• Seeded revenue reports
for compliance reviews
and audit
• Ad hoc reporting layer
EBS Order
Management
EBS Projects
EBS Service
Contracts
EBS Accounts
Receivable
3rd Party
Revenue Events Extracted via Delivered Source Views
Fusion Revenue Management
EBS Order
Management
EBS Accounts
Receivable
EBS Costing
PaymentCustomer Acceptance Revenue
General Ledger
Accounting
First Four Steps 5. Recognize Revenue
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Centralized
workarea
Actionable
Analytics and
Reporting
Spreadsheet
IntegrationFUSION REVENUE MANAGEMENT
Revenue
accounting
Revenue
Sources
Reference
data
Automated
Compliance
Coexistence – Automated Revenue Management
Centralized, Automated Revenue Management
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
On-Premise
ERP Cloud - Pre-packaged Integration
Cloud to On-Premise Integration
25
REVENUE MANAGEMENT Cloud Spreadsheet
Integration
Centralized
Dashboard
Actionable Analytics
and Reporting
Automated
Compliance
Revenue
Accounting
Revenue
Sources
Reference
Data
 Automated extract sales, contract and
other revenue transactions from EBS
 Automated load of source contract
transactions to ERP Cloud secured
‘Universal Content Management
Server’ and subsequent processing
for revenue recognition
 Compliant revenue subledger data
exported to Accounting
 Define and load revenue pricing data
using spreadsheets
 Predefined processes to synchronize
customer and item data master data
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle Fusion Revenue Management
Addressing Key Challenges for Revenue Managers
Demand for
Automation
Automation of contract
identification, expected
consideration and performance
obligation valuation
Identify Contracts With Customers
• Automatically identifies Performance Obligations as part of a
Contract With A Customer
• Supports cross application and cross document Contracts With
Customers
Calculate and Manage “Expected Consideration”
revenue pricing
• Automatically groups stand alone sales based on user defined
pricing dimensions
• Imports Estimated Selling Prices from Budgeting & other
processes
• Supports multiple representations of SSP & ESP
Allocate Transaction Price to Performance
Obligations
• Automatic validation of compliance with Expected Consideration
• Creates adjustments based on relative observed selling prices
and relative estimated sales prices
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle Fusion Revenue Management
Addressing Key Challenges for Revenue Managers
Track Performance Obligations separately to
Receivables
• Revenue document follows the Performance Obligation using
Step 4 valuation and planned customer fulfilment
• Automatically assign satisfaction events to recognize revenue
on performance (and delay until performance)
• Generate accounting entriesAdjust Performance Obligation Values
• Revenue price allocations automatically calculated, visible on
the Revenue Document by performance obligation, ready for
accounting
• Performance satisfaction forecasting, revenue value
adjustments, delay or advance revenue on performance
updates
Manage Revenue
• Workarea provides centralized view of revenue tasks and status
• Central reporting platform for all revenue processing
Many
Sources of Truth
Centralized repository for
reporting and accounting
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15
Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective
Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features
Transition Arrangements
Peoplesoft & JD Edwards
Where we are on the timeline
1
2
3
4
5
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
• Option One A, full retrospective, requires you to reprocess all transactions
• Option One B, practical expedient, requires you to reprocess all transactions relevant at
year-ends, (deferred revenue balances plus some)
• Option Two requires you
– (a) to reprocess contracts already executed in your deferred revenue world as if they were in a
performance obligation world, for the opening balance sheet for the year beginning after 1/1/2017,
– (b) and then to reprocess new contracts already executed in your performance obligation world
under the new guidance, as if they were in a deferred revenue world, using the old guidance.
• Fusion Revenue Management ships with reprocessing capability
Transition Data Need: Reprocess all/some transactions
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Transition
• There are two transition options with certain sub-options; nine ways in total.
• In practice, you need to model them all (planning, guidance, taxation, etc.)
– There is a substantial dollar value difference between them
* deferred revenue that may never be realized
* performance obligations that are already satisfied
• To model one option, you need to re-iterate with different performance obligation or different prices or
different recognition rules: it will be reiterative
• We’re suggesting that:
1. Use your existing RR system to do “old rules”
2. Use FRM post Rel. 9 to do new rules in FY 2017 and iterative modeling before that
3. Use Essbase to figure the difference between #1 and #2 for restatement purposes
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Transition Comparison: $ impact & Full/Partial Retrospective
Model new rules in Fusion Revenue Management, compare and iterate as needed, and cutover in CY 2016
Existing Revenue
Recognition Process
Topic 606 / IFRS 15
Using Fusion Revenue
Management
FY15, FY16
General
Ledger
Content
EPM &
Original
Financial
Statements
FY 17
General
Ledger
Content
EPM &
Original
Financial
Statements
Old Rules & Restatement until last balance sheet before adoption
(2017)
New Rules Apply
Cutove
r
FY 2017
EPM &
Restated
Financial
Statements
Oracle
Essbase
Home
Grown
Iterative
Modeling
FY 2016
Compare and
Contrast
Old and New in
Oracle Essbase
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Transition Comparison: $ Impact, Big Bang & Later
Disclosure
Model new rules in Fusion Revenue Management, compare and iterate as needed, and cutover in CY 2016
Existing Revenue
Recognition Process
Topic 606 / IFRS 15
Using Fusion Revenue
Management
FY15, FY16
General
Ledger
Content
EPM &
Original
Financial
Statements
FY 17->
General
Ledger
Content
EPM &
Original
Financial
Statements
Old Rules & Restatement until last balance sheet before adoption
(2017)
New Rules Apply
Cutove
r
FY 2017
Oracle
Essbase
Home
Grown
Iterative
Modeling
FY 2016
Compare and
Contrast
Old and New in
Oracle Essbase
Oracle
Essbase
Old Revenue System Maintained until +/- 2020
EPM &
Restated
Financial
Statements
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15
Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective
Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features
Transition Arrangements
Peoplesoft & JD Edwards
Where we are on the timeline
1
2
3
4
5
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Peoplesoft: Flexible Software Adaptable to Each Organization’s Needs
Configuring Customer Contracts to Support the New Revenue Accounting Standard
Planned
for 9.2+
NewRevenueRecognition
Requirements
The Planned Solution for You
• Features That Promote Compliance with New Converged Standard
• Tools and Functionality that Provide Options Without Forcing
Change on Organizations With Simpler Contracts
NewPlannedCapabilities
Streamlined Allocation of Contract
Price
New Attributes to Identify Bundled
Products and Services
Price Determination for Revenue
Flexibility to Maintain Prices for
Revenue Separately from Billing
Mgt of Contract Obligations, Reports,
& Support of Price Audits
Impacts All Organizations with Revenue
from Customers
New Accounts In GL and Additional
Schedules at Qtr/Yr End
Comprehensive Transition and
Comparative Reporting Reqts.
Documentation and Audit
Biggest Impact-Multiple Products & Services
Bundled Products, Variable Prices, Fin’d Prod
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
• New feature to support recognition of revenue
for invoices without a contract
• Performance Liability Accounting
• Recognize all, none, less than, or more than the
invoice amount
– Performance obligation completion is determined by
a process defined by the organization utilizing the
system
• Audit trail of all revenue recognition activity
JDE: Accounts Receivable Revenue Recognition
New Feature
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
• Additional capabilities to tie detailed
project costs to contract performance
obligations
• Flexibility to manage change orders
and existing contract performance
obligations in different ways
• More control of invoicing that affect
revenue adjustments
JDE Contracts Revenue Recognition
New Flexibility
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15
Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective
Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features
Transition Arrangements
Peoplesoft & JD Edwards
Where we are on the timeline
1
2
3
4
5
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Understanding the Standard: Old versus New
Mandate: Don’t recognize Revenue until all delivered Mandate: Recognize Revenue once performed
Deferred
Revenue is a
sales invoice
you are
feeding to
the P&L
Contract
Liability is a
performance
obligation
you have not
delivered on
UBR are
receivables
you haven’t
billed yet
Contract
Assets
are not
Receivables,
and you
might even
have
billed
already
Revenue and
Deferred
Revenue are
valued at
invoice value
Plus or minus
Carve-ins and
carve outs
Revenue and
Contract
Balances are
valued at
Performance
Obligation
value per Step
Four
VSOE, TPE, Estimate = Fair Value OSSP, ESP = Expected Consideration
Multiple Element
Arrangement
Contract
With Customers
Elements
Units of Account
Distinct
Performance
Obligations
The
Constrain
t
Revenue
Schedule
Performanc
e
Satisfaction
Specific USA
Industries
All Commercial
Customers
Bill, then defer Four steps to valuation, then book that
Follow the
carve out
Follow
Customer
satisfaction
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Understanding the Standard : Old versus NewFAS
B IAS
B
Mandate: Don’t recognize Revenue until all delivered Mandate: Recognize Revenue once performed
Deferred
Revenue is a
sales invoice
you are
feeding to
the P&L
Contract
Liability is a
performance
obligation
you have not
delivered on
UBR are
receivables
you haven’t
billed yet
Contract
Assets
are not
Receivables,
and you
might even
have
billed
already
Revenue and
Deferred
Revenue are
valued at
invoice value
Plus or minus
Carve-ins and
carve outs
Revenue and
Contract
Balances are
valued at
Performance
Obligation
value per Step
Four
VSOE, TPE, Estimate = Fair Value OSSP, ESP = Expected Consideration
Multiple Element
Arrangement
Contract
With Customers
Elements
Units of Account
Distinct
Performance
Obligations
The
Constrain
t
Revenue
Schedule
Performanc
e
Satisfaction
Specific USA
Industries
All Commercial
Customers
Bill, then defer Four steps to valuation, then book that
Follow the
carve out
Follow
Customer
satisfaction
Repealed
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
New Standard Concept Release 8 & 9 VSOE Concept
Contract with Customer Multiple Element Arrangement
Performance Obligation Element of the Arrangement
Observed/Estimated Standalone SP VSOE, TPE, ESP
Contract Liability Deferred Revenue
FRM Initial Release: US GAAP “VSOE” support
Released in March 2014
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
FRM Initial Release : US GAAP “VSOE” support
Released in March 2014
New Standard Concept Release 8 & 9 VSOE Concept
Contract with Customer Multiple Element Arrangement
Performance Obligation Element of the Arrangement
Observed/Estimated Standalone SP VSOE, TPE, ESP
Contract Liability Deferred Revenue
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Fusion Revenue Management Timelines
 Release 8 is generally available (March 2014), moving to 9 now
– Early adopters signing up
– More information available on cloud.oracle.com
 Release update for new standards
Release UpdatesCode & Test
Customers & Big 4
Review
& Study
Final
Standard
May 28, 2014 Today Don’t Panic, Do Hurry UpMarch ‘14 TBD
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Release 8 and 9 (VSOE) (available
since March ‘14)
EBS & Instance integration
Identify “MEA”
Identify “Element”
Value “MEA”
Value “Element”; VSOE
Five Steps
Accounting for Deferred Revenue
(sales invoices)
US Hitech VSOE delivery
Summer 2015
ID Contracts w. Customers
ID Performance Obligations
Value Contract
Value Performance Obligation;
SSP, ESP
Valuation before invoicing
Accounting for Performance
Obligations (steps 2 & 4)
General Non-Specific
Framework
Other Plans
Customer & Big Four Input,
as available
Specific Industry compliance
Additional Features in
Revenue Management
Additional features in
Receivables, Project
Accounting, et cetera
Disclosure Reporting
Fusion Revenue Management Availability
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
More about Fusion Revenue Management
Conference
Session
Thursday,
Oct 02
10:15 AM -
11:00 AM
CON8402 - Oracle Fusion Revenue Management
Cloud Service: Highlights and Customer Adoption
Tapomoy Dey, Senior Director, Oracle
Westin
Market Street
Metropolitan II
Monitor our blog at https://blogs.oracle.com/FinancialsMkting
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Questions and Answers
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
Revenue management kpmg_oracle

More Related Content

Similar to Revenue management kpmg_oracle

Con8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial close
Con8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial closeCon8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial close
Con8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial closeOracle
 
Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...
Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...
Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...Steelwedge
 
A Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdf
A Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdfA Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdf
A Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdfeprentise
 
PFSWeb - Corporate Presentation May 2014
PFSWeb -  Corporate Presentation May 2014PFSWeb -  Corporate Presentation May 2014
PFSWeb - Corporate Presentation May 2014Company Spotlight
 
Pfs investor presentation_14
Pfs investor presentation_14Pfs investor presentation_14
Pfs investor presentation_14Company Spotlight
 
New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...
New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...
New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...Steelwedge
 
Your Digital Finance Transformation Journey
Your Digital Finance Transformation JourneyYour Digital Finance Transformation Journey
Your Digital Finance Transformation JourneyWorkday, Inc.
 
Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017
Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017
Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017paul young cpa, cga
 
Opex Guru Introduction
Opex Guru  IntroductionOpex Guru  Introduction
Opex Guru IntroductionAnil Bakshi
 
B P G005 Johnson 091807
B P G005  Johnson 091807B P G005  Johnson 091807
B P G005 Johnson 091807Dreamforce07
 
Driver6 Overview
Driver6 OverviewDriver6 Overview
Driver6 Overviewmarkdoll
 
Preparing for ASC 606
Preparing for ASC 606Preparing for ASC 606
Preparing for ASC 606eprentise
 
Corporate Reporting How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...
Corporate Reporting   How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...Corporate Reporting   How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...
Corporate Reporting How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...LDorian
 
Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)
Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)
Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)Ahmed Samir
 
SIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOn
SIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOnSIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOn
SIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOnmanagingmatters
 
The Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & Trends
The Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & TrendsThe Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & Trends
The Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & TrendsBrainSell Technologies
 

Similar to Revenue management kpmg_oracle (20)

Con8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial close
Con8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial closeCon8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial close
Con8208 achieve a quicker and compliant financial close
 
Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...
Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...
Collaborative Demand Planning: A Requirement for Successful Integrated Busine...
 
A Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdf
A Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdfA Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdf
A Stress-free Guide to Mergers Acquisitions and Divestitures.pdf
 
PFSWeb - Corporate Presentation May 2014
PFSWeb -  Corporate Presentation May 2014PFSWeb -  Corporate Presentation May 2014
PFSWeb - Corporate Presentation May 2014
 
Pfs investor presentation_14
Pfs investor presentation_14Pfs investor presentation_14
Pfs investor presentation_14
 
Corporate profile (Mega Infotech
Corporate profile (Mega InfotechCorporate profile (Mega Infotech
Corporate profile (Mega Infotech
 
New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...
New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...
New Year, New Approach: Take Your S&OP, Demand and Supply Planning Processes ...
 
Your Digital Finance Transformation Journey
Your Digital Finance Transformation JourneyYour Digital Finance Transformation Journey
Your Digital Finance Transformation Journey
 
Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017
Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017
Revenue Recognition - FASB and IFRS - March 2017
 
Opex Guru Introduction
Opex Guru  IntroductionOpex Guru  Introduction
Opex Guru Introduction
 
B P G005 Johnson 091807
B P G005  Johnson 091807B P G005  Johnson 091807
B P G005 Johnson 091807
 
Driver6 Overview
Driver6 OverviewDriver6 Overview
Driver6 Overview
 
Preparing for ASC 606
Preparing for ASC 606Preparing for ASC 606
Preparing for ASC 606
 
CC14GMS
CC14GMSCC14GMS
CC14GMS
 
Corporate Reporting How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...
Corporate Reporting   How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...Corporate Reporting   How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...
Corporate Reporting How Your Business Will Be Affected By Impending Regulat...
 
During Transition and Beyond
During Transition and BeyondDuring Transition and Beyond
During Transition and Beyond
 
Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)
Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)
Customer Center of Expertise (Getting Started)
 
SIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOn
SIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOnSIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOn
SIOR MICHIGAN - LUNCHEON PRESENTATIOn
 
The Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & Trends
The Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & TrendsThe Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & Trends
The Future of Finance: Technology, Tools, & Trends
 
Michael Roper - EMEA VP FM, SAP
Michael Roper - EMEA VP FM, SAPMichael Roper - EMEA VP FM, SAP
Michael Roper - EMEA VP FM, SAP
 

Recently uploaded

A Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docx
A Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docxA Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docx
A Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docxComplianceQuest1
 
(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...
(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...
(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...gurkirankumar98700
 
Unveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time Applications
Unveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time ApplicationsUnveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time Applications
Unveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time ApplicationsAlberto González Trastoy
 
BATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASE
BATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASEBATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASE
BATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASEOrtus Solutions, Corp
 
Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...
Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...
Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...aditisharan08
 
The Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdf
The Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdfThe Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdf
The Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdfkalichargn70th171
 
ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...
ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...
ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...Christina Lin
 
Adobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer Data
Adobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer DataAdobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer Data
Adobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer DataBradBedford3
 
Hand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptx
Hand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptxHand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptx
Hand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptxbodapatigopi8531
 
Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)
Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)
Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)OPEN KNOWLEDGE GmbH
 
chapter--4-software-project-planning.ppt
chapter--4-software-project-planning.pptchapter--4-software-project-planning.ppt
chapter--4-software-project-planning.pptkotipi9215
 
why an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdf
why an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdfwhy an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdf
why an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdfjoe51371421
 
What is Binary Language? Computer Number Systems
What is Binary Language?  Computer Number SystemsWhat is Binary Language?  Computer Number Systems
What is Binary Language? Computer Number SystemsJheuzeDellosa
 
Salesforce Certified Field Service Consultant
Salesforce Certified Field Service ConsultantSalesforce Certified Field Service Consultant
Salesforce Certified Field Service ConsultantAxelRicardoTrocheRiq
 
Asset Management Software - Infographic
Asset Management Software - InfographicAsset Management Software - Infographic
Asset Management Software - InfographicHr365.us smith
 
Learn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Learn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdfLearn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Learn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdfkalichargn70th171
 
EY_Graph Database Powered Sustainability
EY_Graph Database Powered SustainabilityEY_Graph Database Powered Sustainability
EY_Graph Database Powered SustainabilityNeo4j
 
Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)
Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)
Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)Intelisync
 

Recently uploaded (20)

A Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docx
A Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docxA Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docx
A Secure and Reliable Document Management System is Essential.docx
 
(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...
(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...
(Genuine) Escort Service Lucknow | Starting ₹,5K To @25k with A/C 🧑🏽‍❤️‍🧑🏻 89...
 
Unveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time Applications
Unveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time ApplicationsUnveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time Applications
Unveiling the Tech Salsa of LAMs with Janus in Real-Time Applications
 
BATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASE
BATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASEBATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASE
BATTLEFIELD ORM: TIPS, TACTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR CONQUERING YOUR DATABASE
 
Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...
Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...
Unit 1.1 Excite Part 1, class 9, cbse...
 
The Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdf
The Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdfThe Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdf
The Ultimate Test Automation Guide_ Best Practices and Tips.pdf
 
ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...
ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...
ODSC - Batch to Stream workshop - integration of Apache Spark, Cassandra, Pos...
 
Exploring iOS App Development: Simplifying the Process
Exploring iOS App Development: Simplifying the ProcessExploring iOS App Development: Simplifying the Process
Exploring iOS App Development: Simplifying the Process
 
Adobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer Data
Adobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer DataAdobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer Data
Adobe Marketo Engage Deep Dives: Using Webhooks to Transfer Data
 
Hand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptx
Hand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptxHand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptx
Hand gesture recognition PROJECT PPT.pptx
 
Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)
Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)
Der Spagat zwischen BIAS und FAIRNESS (2024)
 
chapter--4-software-project-planning.ppt
chapter--4-software-project-planning.pptchapter--4-software-project-planning.ppt
chapter--4-software-project-planning.ppt
 
why an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdf
why an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdfwhy an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdf
why an Opensea Clone Script might be your perfect match.pdf
 
What is Binary Language? Computer Number Systems
What is Binary Language?  Computer Number SystemsWhat is Binary Language?  Computer Number Systems
What is Binary Language? Computer Number Systems
 
Salesforce Certified Field Service Consultant
Salesforce Certified Field Service ConsultantSalesforce Certified Field Service Consultant
Salesforce Certified Field Service Consultant
 
Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SE...
Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SE...Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SE...
Call Girls In Mukherjee Nagar 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SE...
 
Asset Management Software - Infographic
Asset Management Software - InfographicAsset Management Software - Infographic
Asset Management Software - Infographic
 
Learn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Learn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdfLearn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdf
Learn the Fundamentals of XCUITest Framework_ A Beginner's Guide.pdf
 
EY_Graph Database Powered Sustainability
EY_Graph Database Powered SustainabilityEY_Graph Database Powered Sustainability
EY_Graph Database Powered Sustainability
 
Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)
Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)
Introduction to Decentralized Applications (dApps)
 

Revenue management kpmg_oracle

  • 1. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle’s Initial Response to Topic 606 & IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers Stephen Thompson, KPMG Seamus Moran, Oracle Financials Development
  • 2. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Content Steve Thompson will discuss compliance with the standard and issues in transitioning to it. Seamus Moran will discuss Oracle’s product response Fusion Revenue Management Fusion & eBusiness Suite Peoplesoft Contracts JD Edwards Contracts
  • 3. WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here The New US GAAP and IFRS Revenue Recognition Standard Stephen Thompson
  • 4. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 4 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here – Replaces all current rules, including industry and transaction-specific standards – Converges US GAAP and IFRS revenue recognition practices – Principles-based standard will require more judgment in reaching conclusions – Greater use of estimates – Complex transition requirements NEW REVENUE RECOGNITION RULES Effective date for public entities with December 31 year ends. Nonpublic entities have a one year deferral in effective date. 201820162013 2014 20172015 January 1st Retrospective transition application date January 1st Effective date May 28, 2014 Final standard
  • 5. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 5 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here ● Sweeping changes in the way revenue is recognized by companies… ● New information requirements requiring significant system and process changes… ● Opportunity to reevaluate accounting policies, processes, systems and technology …to achieve improvement in all aspects of the revenue cycle, drive efficiencies and increase value add to the business… Opportunity to achieve improvement in all aspects of the revenue cycle to drive efficiencies and increase value add to the business… Accounting Changes Financial and Operations Process Changes Revenue Recognition Automation and ERP Upgrades Governance and Change NEW REVENUE RECOGNITION RULES, NOT ONLY A CHALLENGE BUT ALSO AN OPPORTUNITY…
  • 6. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 6 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here Business ■ Impact on business practices ■ Budget and management reporting ■ Communication with financial markets ■ Covenant compliance ■ Opportunity to rethink business practice ■ Coordination with other strategic initiatives Systems and Processes ■ Impact on ERP system ■ General ledger, subledgers and reporting packages ■ Supporting transition process ■ New processes ■ SOX compliance ● Change Management ● Project management ● Impact on internal resources ■ Training (accounting, sales, etc.) ■ Revenue change management team ■ Multi-national locations Accounting, Tax, and Reporting ■ Accounting policies ■ Historical results and transition ■ Reporting differences ■ Disclosure of expected impact ■ Tax reporting ■ Tax planning For many companies, implementation of the new revenue recognition standard is more than an accounting exercise, as many different groups will need to be involved. BROAD-BASED ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACT Revenue Recognition
  • 7. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 7 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here EXAMPLE REVENUE RECOGNITION CHANGES Existing Standards New Standard 100+ sources for revenue guidance 1 standard for all arrangements, all industries Must have “persuasive evidence” of arrangement Must have “legally binding” arrangement Fees must be fixed & determinable Fees are estimated if sufficient history exists No recognition of contingent revenue No similar prohibition; subject to estimation Unit of account based on “standalone value” Unit of account based on “distinct” No rules on accounting for modifications Modification rules can result in complicated acctg. Software industry held to higher standard (“VSOE”) Software guidance eliminated IP license recognized upfront or ratable based on practice IP license subject to specific rules on how to recognize Capitalizing contract acquisition costs optional Capitalizing contract acquisition costs required Revenue disclosures limited to policy discussion Extensive disclosures required
  • 8. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 8 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here CHOICE OF TRANSITION METHOD IMPACTS IMPLEMENTATION Evaluate Existing Contracts for Cumulative Effect Adjustment Timeline is based on requirements applicable to a public entity with December 31 year end. Nonpublic entities may defer application of standard for one year beyond public entity effective date. 2012 and prior 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 and beyond CumulativeEffect Method Retrospective Method Maintain Existing Systems and Processes for Legacy GAAP Reporting Dual reporting capability Dual reporting capability Evaluate Existing Contracts for Cumulative Effect Adjustment Maintain New Systems and Processes Maintain New Systems and Processes Maintain Existing Systems and Processes for Legacy GAAP Reporting
  • 9. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 9 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here ALLOCATING TRANSACTION PRICES: SYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS We are seeing many companies who have not already automated revenue allocation looking to use this as an opportunity to fix that Automation of multiple element accounting ● Address manually (Excel ®, other) ● Address with bolt-on third party revenue accounting automation tools Historical approach: Opportunity
  • 10. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 10 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here Before designing the right system solution, an assessment needs to be performed; best practice approach is as follows: ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES Accounting diagnostic Technology and Broader Impact Evaluation Process and information gap analysis Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Transition Option Assessment ● Accounting policy ● Disclosure requirements ● Contract reviews Accounting Diagnostic ● Identify information requirements ● Identify information and process gaps ● Map to existing sources Process and information gap analysis ● Identify potential impact on IT, tax , controls, ops, FP&A, investor relations, etc. Technology and Broader Impacts ● Determine potential impact of each option to financials and business ● Assess readiness to elect each transition option Transition Option Assessment Illustrative timeline for assessment phase:
  • 11. © 2014 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 292510 11 WE HELP you realize its potential THEY SAY the future is here IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE Potential Scenarios: Low impact Moderate impact High impact Retrospective adopterKey:  Acctg. Assessment  Implementation  Design  Implement  Sustain Roadmap Assess ImplementDesign Sustain “Business as usual” 2014 2015 2016 2017 Optional retrospective reporting period Timeline intended to be illustrative only. Preparation of a timeline for a specific company will require making educated decisions based on specific facts and circumstances. May 28, 2014: New revenue recognition standard issued Effective date for public calendar year company
  • 12. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle Product Response Seamus Moran, Financials Development
  • 13. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Safe Harbor Statement The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions. The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described for Oracle’s products remains at the sole discretion of Oracle.
  • 14. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15 Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features Transition Arrangements Peoplesoft & JD Edwards Where we are on the timeline 1 2 3 4 5
  • 15. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Fusion Revenue Management Cloud Service Generally Available Release 8 (US GAAP) Revenue Management 21 Customers provided development and design feedback Over 1,000 hours testing 7 Usability sessions Week Long validation session
  • 16. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |
  • 17. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Understanding the Standard: Old versus New Mandate: Don’t recognize Revenue until all delivered Mandate: Recognize Revenue once performed Deferred Revenue is a sales invoice you are feeding to the P&L Contract Liability is a performance obligation you have not delivered on UBR are receivables you haven’t billed yet Contract Assets are not Receivables, and you might even have billed already Revenue and Deferred Revenue are valued at invoice value Plus or minus Carve-ins and carve outs Revenue and Contract Balances are valued at Performance Obligation value per Step Four VSOE, TPE, Estimate = Fair Value OSSP, ESP = Expected Consideration Multiple Element Arrangement Contract With Customers Elements Units of Account Distinct Performance Obligations The Constrain t Revenue Schedule Performanc e Satisfaction Specific USA Industries All Commercial Customers Bill, then defer Four steps to valuation, then book that Follow the carve out Follow Customer satisfaction
  • 18. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Scope – Topic 606 & IFRS 15 • Topic 606/IFRS 15 compliance • Billing and revenue reconciliation • Open Obligations • Unaccounted • Liabilities • Assets Reporting 1. Identify Contracts with Customers from multiple sources 2. Identify Performance Obligations Obligations 3. Calculate Transaction Price 4. Allocate Transaction Price to Obligations •. Establish SSPs & ESPs •. Relative Allocation Revenue Value 5. Recognize Revenue •. At Performance Obligation Valuation •. Contract Liabilities •. Contract Assets •. Transfer/satisfaction •. Satisfaction forecast •. Related Accounting Revenue Recognition
  • 19. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Fusion Revenue Management Outline: A Framework Sources for Performance Obligations Fusion Revenue Management Output & Accounting Order Management (OM) Provide Contract, Satisfaction, Billing, Customer, Product & other relevant data 1. Identify Contracts with Customers over different source data 2. Identify performance obligations, categorize as performed or not 3. Value the Contracts 4. Value the Performance Obligations using relative SSP, ESP, etc. 5. Record Revenue, Contract Liabilities and Contract Assets using Performance Obligations and their valuations. Reporting: • Contract & Obligation Reporting • Revenue, Billing & Obligation Reconciliation • Performance forecast Account Receivables (AR) Project Management (PA) Contracts Pricing Advanced Pricing CRM Shipping Support Accounting: • Publish data to accounting engines (eg SLA) • Activity and Balances Other Products Custom, Excel, Non-Oracle et cetera
  • 20. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Fusion Revenue Management Overview Business Scenario Software License Support Consulting Software License Support Consulting Transaction Price 100 20 80 200 Customer Bill Software License Support Consulting Transaction Total 100 20 80 200 Performance Obligations Invoice Revenue Values OSSP/ESP 98 26 76 200 Software License Support Consulting Total 98.00 8.66 16.00 28.67 Performance Satisfaction Forecast Period I Period II 0.00 8.67 20.00 122.66 48.67 Period III 0.00 8.67 40.00
  • 21. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | The 5 Steps are the Data Capture - Revenue Accounting is based on Performance Obligation ID & Valuation Search through “order lines” from many sources & Link ID distinct performance obligation from “order lines” Establish linked transaction price & constraint Apply relative observed SSP or ESP Revenue Bookkeeping Source Detail Contract ID Performance Obligation Amount To Bill Revenue Amount PO Xfr (from) / to PA Performance obligation 1000 1000-10 - 4,000 (1,000) OM Performance obligation 1000 5,000 Alien Performance obligation 1000 1000-20 1,000 2,000 1,000 OM Performance obligation 1100 1100-30 3,000 2,800 (200) Excel Performance obligation 1100 1100-40 2,500 2,700 200 PA Performance obligation 1100 1100-50 2,350 2,350 - OM Performance obligation 1200 1200-60 4,000 4,000 - OM Performance obligation 1200 1200-70 1,800 1,800 - Recognize Revenue Recognize CL Recognize CA E.G.
  • 22. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15 Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features Transition Arrangements Peoplesoft & JD Edwards Where we are on the timeline 1 2 3 4 5
  • 23. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Co-Existence Functional Architecture On the Cloud (or on premise) Audit & Analyze 1.Identify & 3. Value Contracts from many sources •.Establish SSP & ESP 2.Identify & 4. Value Performance Obligations Create Accounting • Separate revenue / billing • Value @ Perf. Obligation • Satisfaction –ratable, immediate, pending; Satisfaction forecasts • Generate revenue and contract asset & liability balances entries using Performance Obligation valuation • Seeded revenue reports for compliance reviews and audit • Ad hoc reporting layer EBS Order Management EBS Projects EBS Service Contracts EBS Accounts Receivable 3rd Party Revenue Events Extracted via Delivered Source Views Fusion Revenue Management EBS Order Management EBS Accounts Receivable EBS Costing PaymentCustomer Acceptance Revenue General Ledger Accounting First Four Steps 5. Recognize Revenue
  • 24. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Centralized workarea Actionable Analytics and Reporting Spreadsheet IntegrationFUSION REVENUE MANAGEMENT Revenue accounting Revenue Sources Reference data Automated Compliance Coexistence – Automated Revenue Management Centralized, Automated Revenue Management
  • 25. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | On-Premise ERP Cloud - Pre-packaged Integration Cloud to On-Premise Integration 25 REVENUE MANAGEMENT Cloud Spreadsheet Integration Centralized Dashboard Actionable Analytics and Reporting Automated Compliance Revenue Accounting Revenue Sources Reference Data  Automated extract sales, contract and other revenue transactions from EBS  Automated load of source contract transactions to ERP Cloud secured ‘Universal Content Management Server’ and subsequent processing for revenue recognition  Compliant revenue subledger data exported to Accounting  Define and load revenue pricing data using spreadsheets  Predefined processes to synchronize customer and item data master data
  • 26. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle Fusion Revenue Management Addressing Key Challenges for Revenue Managers Demand for Automation Automation of contract identification, expected consideration and performance obligation valuation Identify Contracts With Customers • Automatically identifies Performance Obligations as part of a Contract With A Customer • Supports cross application and cross document Contracts With Customers Calculate and Manage “Expected Consideration” revenue pricing • Automatically groups stand alone sales based on user defined pricing dimensions • Imports Estimated Selling Prices from Budgeting & other processes • Supports multiple representations of SSP & ESP Allocate Transaction Price to Performance Obligations • Automatic validation of compliance with Expected Consideration • Creates adjustments based on relative observed selling prices and relative estimated sales prices
  • 27. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle Fusion Revenue Management Addressing Key Challenges for Revenue Managers Track Performance Obligations separately to Receivables • Revenue document follows the Performance Obligation using Step 4 valuation and planned customer fulfilment • Automatically assign satisfaction events to recognize revenue on performance (and delay until performance) • Generate accounting entriesAdjust Performance Obligation Values • Revenue price allocations automatically calculated, visible on the Revenue Document by performance obligation, ready for accounting • Performance satisfaction forecasting, revenue value adjustments, delay or advance revenue on performance updates Manage Revenue • Workarea provides centralized view of revenue tasks and status • Central reporting platform for all revenue processing Many Sources of Truth Centralized repository for reporting and accounting
  • 28. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15 Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features Transition Arrangements Peoplesoft & JD Edwards Where we are on the timeline 1 2 3 4 5
  • 29. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | • Option One A, full retrospective, requires you to reprocess all transactions • Option One B, practical expedient, requires you to reprocess all transactions relevant at year-ends, (deferred revenue balances plus some) • Option Two requires you – (a) to reprocess contracts already executed in your deferred revenue world as if they were in a performance obligation world, for the opening balance sheet for the year beginning after 1/1/2017, – (b) and then to reprocess new contracts already executed in your performance obligation world under the new guidance, as if they were in a deferred revenue world, using the old guidance. • Fusion Revenue Management ships with reprocessing capability Transition Data Need: Reprocess all/some transactions
  • 30. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Transition • There are two transition options with certain sub-options; nine ways in total. • In practice, you need to model them all (planning, guidance, taxation, etc.) – There is a substantial dollar value difference between them * deferred revenue that may never be realized * performance obligations that are already satisfied • To model one option, you need to re-iterate with different performance obligation or different prices or different recognition rules: it will be reiterative • We’re suggesting that: 1. Use your existing RR system to do “old rules” 2. Use FRM post Rel. 9 to do new rules in FY 2017 and iterative modeling before that 3. Use Essbase to figure the difference between #1 and #2 for restatement purposes
  • 31. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Transition Comparison: $ impact & Full/Partial Retrospective Model new rules in Fusion Revenue Management, compare and iterate as needed, and cutover in CY 2016 Existing Revenue Recognition Process Topic 606 / IFRS 15 Using Fusion Revenue Management FY15, FY16 General Ledger Content EPM & Original Financial Statements FY 17 General Ledger Content EPM & Original Financial Statements Old Rules & Restatement until last balance sheet before adoption (2017) New Rules Apply Cutove r FY 2017 EPM & Restated Financial Statements Oracle Essbase Home Grown Iterative Modeling FY 2016 Compare and Contrast Old and New in Oracle Essbase
  • 32. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Transition Comparison: $ Impact, Big Bang & Later Disclosure Model new rules in Fusion Revenue Management, compare and iterate as needed, and cutover in CY 2016 Existing Revenue Recognition Process Topic 606 / IFRS 15 Using Fusion Revenue Management FY15, FY16 General Ledger Content EPM & Original Financial Statements FY 17-> General Ledger Content EPM & Original Financial Statements Old Rules & Restatement until last balance sheet before adoption (2017) New Rules Apply Cutove r FY 2017 Oracle Essbase Home Grown Iterative Modeling FY 2016 Compare and Contrast Old and New in Oracle Essbase Oracle Essbase Old Revenue System Maintained until +/- 2020 EPM & Restated Financial Statements
  • 33. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15 Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features Transition Arrangements Peoplesoft & JD Edwards Where we are on the timeline 1 2 3 4 5
  • 34. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Peoplesoft: Flexible Software Adaptable to Each Organization’s Needs Configuring Customer Contracts to Support the New Revenue Accounting Standard Planned for 9.2+ NewRevenueRecognition Requirements The Planned Solution for You • Features That Promote Compliance with New Converged Standard • Tools and Functionality that Provide Options Without Forcing Change on Organizations With Simpler Contracts NewPlannedCapabilities Streamlined Allocation of Contract Price New Attributes to Identify Bundled Products and Services Price Determination for Revenue Flexibility to Maintain Prices for Revenue Separately from Billing Mgt of Contract Obligations, Reports, & Support of Price Audits Impacts All Organizations with Revenue from Customers New Accounts In GL and Additional Schedules at Qtr/Yr End Comprehensive Transition and Comparative Reporting Reqts. Documentation and Audit Biggest Impact-Multiple Products & Services Bundled Products, Variable Prices, Fin’d Prod
  • 35. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | • New feature to support recognition of revenue for invoices without a contract • Performance Liability Accounting • Recognize all, none, less than, or more than the invoice amount – Performance obligation completion is determined by a process defined by the organization utilizing the system • Audit trail of all revenue recognition activity JDE: Accounts Receivable Revenue Recognition New Feature
  • 36. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | • Additional capabilities to tie detailed project costs to contract performance obligations • Flexibility to manage change orders and existing contract performance obligations in different ways • More control of invoicing that affect revenue adjustments JDE Contracts Revenue Recognition New Flexibility
  • 37. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Oracle’s Product Response for Topic 606 & IFRS 15 Topic 606 and IFRS 15 Requirements & Objective Fusion Revenue Management Footprint & Features Transition Arrangements Peoplesoft & JD Edwards Where we are on the timeline 1 2 3 4 5
  • 38. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Understanding the Standard: Old versus New Mandate: Don’t recognize Revenue until all delivered Mandate: Recognize Revenue once performed Deferred Revenue is a sales invoice you are feeding to the P&L Contract Liability is a performance obligation you have not delivered on UBR are receivables you haven’t billed yet Contract Assets are not Receivables, and you might even have billed already Revenue and Deferred Revenue are valued at invoice value Plus or minus Carve-ins and carve outs Revenue and Contract Balances are valued at Performance Obligation value per Step Four VSOE, TPE, Estimate = Fair Value OSSP, ESP = Expected Consideration Multiple Element Arrangement Contract With Customers Elements Units of Account Distinct Performance Obligations The Constrain t Revenue Schedule Performanc e Satisfaction Specific USA Industries All Commercial Customers Bill, then defer Four steps to valuation, then book that Follow the carve out Follow Customer satisfaction
  • 39. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Understanding the Standard : Old versus NewFAS B IAS B Mandate: Don’t recognize Revenue until all delivered Mandate: Recognize Revenue once performed Deferred Revenue is a sales invoice you are feeding to the P&L Contract Liability is a performance obligation you have not delivered on UBR are receivables you haven’t billed yet Contract Assets are not Receivables, and you might even have billed already Revenue and Deferred Revenue are valued at invoice value Plus or minus Carve-ins and carve outs Revenue and Contract Balances are valued at Performance Obligation value per Step Four VSOE, TPE, Estimate = Fair Value OSSP, ESP = Expected Consideration Multiple Element Arrangement Contract With Customers Elements Units of Account Distinct Performance Obligations The Constrain t Revenue Schedule Performanc e Satisfaction Specific USA Industries All Commercial Customers Bill, then defer Four steps to valuation, then book that Follow the carve out Follow Customer satisfaction Repealed
  • 40. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | New Standard Concept Release 8 & 9 VSOE Concept Contract with Customer Multiple Element Arrangement Performance Obligation Element of the Arrangement Observed/Estimated Standalone SP VSOE, TPE, ESP Contract Liability Deferred Revenue FRM Initial Release: US GAAP “VSOE” support Released in March 2014
  • 41. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | FRM Initial Release : US GAAP “VSOE” support Released in March 2014 New Standard Concept Release 8 & 9 VSOE Concept Contract with Customer Multiple Element Arrangement Performance Obligation Element of the Arrangement Observed/Estimated Standalone SP VSOE, TPE, ESP Contract Liability Deferred Revenue
  • 42. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Fusion Revenue Management Timelines  Release 8 is generally available (March 2014), moving to 9 now – Early adopters signing up – More information available on cloud.oracle.com  Release update for new standards Release UpdatesCode & Test Customers & Big 4 Review & Study Final Standard May 28, 2014 Today Don’t Panic, Do Hurry UpMarch ‘14 TBD
  • 43. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Release 8 and 9 (VSOE) (available since March ‘14) EBS & Instance integration Identify “MEA” Identify “Element” Value “MEA” Value “Element”; VSOE Five Steps Accounting for Deferred Revenue (sales invoices) US Hitech VSOE delivery Summer 2015 ID Contracts w. Customers ID Performance Obligations Value Contract Value Performance Obligation; SSP, ESP Valuation before invoicing Accounting for Performance Obligations (steps 2 & 4) General Non-Specific Framework Other Plans Customer & Big Four Input, as available Specific Industry compliance Additional Features in Revenue Management Additional features in Receivables, Project Accounting, et cetera Disclosure Reporting Fusion Revenue Management Availability
  • 44. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | More about Fusion Revenue Management Conference Session Thursday, Oct 02 10:15 AM - 11:00 AM CON8402 - Oracle Fusion Revenue Management Cloud Service: Highlights and Customer Adoption Tapomoy Dey, Senior Director, Oracle Westin Market Street Metropolitan II Monitor our blog at https://blogs.oracle.com/FinancialsMkting
  • 45. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | Questions and Answers
  • 46. Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. |

Editor's Notes

  1. <number>
  2. <number>
  3. O <number>
  4. 1. New revenue standard
  5. Many of us have seen this slide before – but it highlight an important point. The people, processes and systems that either support…or are affected by…the revenue recognition cycle span throughout an organization. Therefore for many companies, the implementation of the new revenue standard will involve not just accounting and financial reporting resources, but also other groups throughout the organization. On the next few slides I will highlight a few of these areas.
  6. Overall message – Transition requirements GREATLY complicate the implementation effort. This slide includes transitions – when in presentation mode must be advanced to add effects There are many reasons why a company might choose either the cumulative effect method or the retrospective method of adoption. Each company will need to consider its specific circumstances when making that decision. What I want to focus on today is the implications that those different methods of adoption may have on your implementation plan. To start, let’s take a look at the cumulative effect method of adoption. In the timeline on this slide we are assuming a 1/1/17 effective date. 1ST TRANSITION Now the first thing that jumps out at you is the top row – reflected in pink – which illustrates the fact that calculating the cumulative effect will require companies to review historical accounting. For companies with longer term customer contracts, with deliverables being fulfilled over a period of time – perhaps multiple years – the population of contracts that are open as of the effective date may be larger, and may require a longer “look back” into historical periods in order to analyze the change in revenue under the new standard. On the slide we have represented this effort as roughly 2 ½ years, but in actuality the timeline will vary for each company. This slide also illustrates in the second row that new systems and processes that enable the determination of revenue under the new standard will be required to be in place no later than the effective date. 2ND TRANSITION Finally, the third row – in green – illustrates that the existing systems and process for legacy GAAP reporting will continue not just through the effective date…but all the way through the end of 2017 (again, for a calendar year company). This dual reporting capability is necessary because the new standard will require a company to disclose – on a line by line basis – the impact of the new standard on its financial statements during the first year of adoption.   Now let’s contrast those requirements with the retrospective transition method. Under this method, on the effective date companies will begin reporting results for 2017 under the new standard, and also report prior periods as if the new standard had been applied during those periods. 3RD TRANSITION This results in a dual reporting requirements for 2015 and 2016. This can be satisfied either by implementing a real-time dual reporting capability, or an effort after the fact to go back and calculate revenue under the new method. Most companies who desire to adopt retrospectively, and which face significant differences under the new standard, may want to implement their new reporting capability as soon as possible in order to avoid having to go back and recalculate revenue for 2015 and 2016 after the fact. The timing of when this dual reporting capability goes live will depend on individual facts and circumstances. In many cases, the extent of process and system changes may delay the new reporting capability to a later date. Nonetheless, most of the companies we have been speaking with that are leaning towards a retrospective approach desire to have the dual reporting capability in place as soon as possible. 4th TRANSITION The dotted line reflects the fact that even under the retrospective method, during 2017 there will be requirement to disclose significant ways in which the “new” revenue recognition differs from “legacy” GAAP. This disclosure won’t be as in-depth as required under the cumulative effect method, but nonetheless may require some companies to maintain dual reporting capability through the first year of adoption. 5TH TRANSITION The next thing that jumps out at you is the fact that – like the cumulative effect method – a cumulative effect calculation still needs to be performed under the retrospective method. The difference is in timing – as it is performed as of the beginning of the retrospective period. The extent to which historical periods need to be considered will depend on how far back open contracts extend 6th TRANSITION Finally, I wanted to point out that the retrospective method of adoption could be complicated by the SEC’s 5 year reporting requirement under Regulation S-K. Unless the SEC provides an exception from its rule, then companies would need to apply the new standard to 2014 and 2013 in order to retrospectively adopt over the entire 5 year period. b) Conclusion – What does this mean as you plan for implementation? Well without the option of adopting the standard prospectively – as we have had on most new revenue standards in the past – the implementation of this standard will become more complicated. Many companies I have been speaking with that expect significant changes to result from the standard are intrigued by the ability to adopt retrospectively. As you can see, the choice of transition method could impact the timing of your implementation – and influence your implementation strategy. So Companies will need to decide on their transition method early in the process. In addition, an early start to implementation will allow dual reporting capabilities to be introduced sooner, reducing the extent to which historical periods need to be reexamined. <number>
  7. Overview Main message is that we are seeing many companies who currently have a manual process for managing reallocation of consideration, now looking to automate that process as part of their implementation of the new standard. Whether by implementing an existing revenue automation tool, or by looking to the new ERP products. <number>
  8. <number>
  9. 2 minutes 4 stages of standard implementation methodology Assess Design Implement Sustain Timeline is illustrative only – intended to show the approach that companies might take depending on the level of impact to their revenue policies and processes Some key points: A low impact company will be able to wait until later than a high impact company to start the process ALL companies will want to perform an assessment – even a company that believe they have no impact. This is important because while there are many companies that will fall into the LOW impact category, very few – perhaps none – will not be impacted at all. An assessment would include a detailed analysis of revenue recognition policy against the new standard. That process likely would include some detailed contract reviews. The timing of the assessment – indicated on the timeline by the light blue squares – could be delayed for lower impact companies. High impact companies – including companies that have multi-year arrangements – and companies that might want to adopt retrospectively will need to start assessing the impact during 2013 in order to leave sufficient time for designing and implementing process and system changes that may be required to reach a sustainable, scalable solution. The HIGH impact timeline indicate a sustainable solution should be in place by 2016. This would allow a company to tailor its process and systems so they could be leveraged to accumulate the information needed to perform the cumulative effect calculation. For a HIGH impact company with multi-year contracts, calculation of the cumulative effect adjustment will require reaching back even further than 1 year to obtain needed data…those companies will need to have a sutainable solution in place even earlier – or design an interim process for collecting needed information. For retrospective adopters, the same issue exists…the sooner a sustainable solution can be put in place, then the less reliance that has to be placed on manual workaround to collect and analyze data. <number>
  10. <number>
  11. <number>
  12. <number>
  13. <number>
  14. <number>
  15. CRM: Customer Relationship Management VSOE: Vendor Specific Objective evidence (for prices used) ESP: Estimated Selling Price SLA: Subledger accounting (a feature of Oracle eBusiness Suite Release 12) <number>
  16. <number>
  17. <number>
  18. <number>
  19. <number>
  20. <number>
  21. <number>
  22. <number>
  23. <number>
  24. <number>
  25. <number>
  26. <number>
  27. <number>
  28. <number>
  29. <number>
  30. <number>
  31. <number>