SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
C
hapter 1 of this complete look at the issues and concerns sur-
rounding the modern materials recovery facility, published in
the April issue of Resource Recycling, ended with the follow-
ing comment: “With rising costs, falling revenues and long-term
contract obligations, there are more than a few stories of insufficient
revenues to cover operations costs and contract responsibilities like
commodity rebates and public education programs.”
What materials recovery facility can overcome the daunting
challenges of change and financial crisis today? After visiting well
over 250 MRFs over the past two decades, I have witnessed many
valuable attributes that the best MRF operators possess, regardless
of individual management styles. The best practices developed by
those managers may prove invaluable for operators under pressure in
today’s environment.
There are excellent operators working for all the major profes-
sional MRF service providers. My former company, Waste Manage-
ment, had some of the best facilities and managers I have personally
observed. Excellence can also be found at many other companies,
including large haulers, independent professionals and integrat-
ed paper mill operations. There are, of course, poorly operated
facilities with easily spotted indicators, which can be found at an
alarming number of MRF sites – and generally stem from a lack of
training, acumen or control.
A good operator can make a giant swing in the success of
a MRF in a short period of time. The bottom-line impacts can
be very large – to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars a
month. I have seen this phenomenon play out at three different
public companies over the last 40 years. What is the special com-
bination of skills and approaches applied by gifted leaders to get
through tough times and the swings of the recycling business? Ex-
ternal considerations, such as customer needs and talent acquisition,
are important, and they’ll be explored in this series at a later date.
For now, let’s look for answers within the MRF operation itself and
the managers who set the pace at top-performing facilities.
Safety – no room for error
A skilled MRF manager will start by ensuring a successful safety
program, with identifiable characteristics. It begins with energy.
Good leaders will “sniff out” the lowering of standards and call
immediate attention to approaching threats to safety. Strong MRF
operators will also stop what they are doing and shut down produc-
tion upon the discovery of serious unsafe acts and incidents – such
as open electric panels, incomplete safety checklists, an unsafe loader
being put back into service. In these instances, the operator calls the
team together to point out the safety deficiency and makes it clear
he or she will not tolerate repeats of the same incident.
It’s also important to establish and reward improving safety
goals and celebrate employee and plant milestones, such as the
avoidance of lost workdays or a significant period of time with no
reportable accidents. If rogue employees or MRF users, such as
third-party trucks tipping on the MRF tip floors, fail to follow the
safety rules or are determined to be a threat, they are weeded out
professionally. There are also regular safety meetings for all workers
and brief toolbox safety huddles every shift. The accident rate will
be low, and morale will be high – a well-operated MRF is a place
where safe practices are trained, understood and followed. Energetic
MRF safety programs are an excellent indicator of healthy plants.
OSHA representatives are now common visitors to MRFs,
which are increasingly complex and potentially dangerous environ-
MasterAND Commander
OF
THE MRF
In the second story in an ongoing series about the modern MRF, our author
shares expert advice on how to run a single-stream facility in the face of volatile
markets, increasing complexity and financial pressures.
BY MICHAEL TIMPANE
Reprinted from
24 RR | May 2015
RR | May 2015 25
ments. Since 1990, there have been over
80 deaths due to forklifts and balers in the
U.S., and many of these fatal incidents took
place at MRFs and transfer stations. There
have also been fatalities due to conveyor
accidents, lack of traffic or energy control,
and crushing and falling. An OSHA visit
can literally put a MRF out of business,
especially if the visit is due to a fatality or
other serious accident.
However, there is nothing intrinsically
hazardous in a MRF if proper protocols are
put into place and enforced. Most MRF
locations long ago adopted a zero-tolerance
policy for poor OSHA compliance for per-
sonal protective equipment, hazcom/right-
to-know, confined spaces, proper lockout/
tagout energy control, equipment guarding,
safety signage and other areas. Yet deaths
still occur when OSHA standards aren’t
followed in MRFs, and, gallingly, some
managers do not even wear appropriate
personal protective equipment themselves
while on-site.
A good operator knows accidents are
very expensive in human costs, lost time,
productivity and potential litigation. Some
have cost MRF operators millions of dollars.
To avoid mistakes, safety checklists
should be used for daily inspections of
equipment, building and traffic control.
The lists can cover numerous guidelines
including: those from an equipment manu-
facturer, revised Z245.41 ANSI standards,
OSHA minimum standards, and MRF
continuous improvement team local safety
recommendations. At well-run operations,
cascading and simple safety checklists are
also assigned to trained personnel – such as
sort-line captains, maintenance technicians
and equipment operators – for pre-shift
inspection and are collected for frequent
review. Such checklists are updated and
controlled with care and are acted upon
immediately to correct deficiencies when
noted.
Additionally, safety procedures and
warning signs – with simple, visual, mul-
tilingual messages – for all employees are
posted near all energy sources, maintenance
areas, elevated platforms, tip floors and
storage areas. The maintenance of signs and
other warnings, like pedestrian-restricted
pathways, are made a priority, and they are
kept clean, easily identified and understood.
In this system, reviewing daily safety rules
and implementing predictable correction
and enforcement activities actually leads to
encouraged employees offering good ideas
on their own.
An effective operator creatively makes
the safety system a welcomed part of the
culture, instead of the dirge of unnecessary
paperwork. “Safety speak,” milestones and
concern for fellow employees become a part
of the common pride in the plant.
Attitude of compliance
When the retired Bill Ruckelshaus, former
chief of the U.S. EPA, came to BFI over 25
years ago, the company leadership adopted
an “obsession with compliance” in regards
to regulation, and its MRF operations were
no exception. The guidelines also required
compliance with even-tougher internal rules
regarding equal opportunity, overtime pay,
emergency response, spill prevention, storm-
water discharge, fire codes, reporting and a
host of other site mandates.
This attitude became the industry
standard, through the great work of pioneers
such as Lloyd Andrew, Bob Davis, Nat
Egosi and Susan Eppes. Great plants regu-
larly and formally review their compliance
obligations and ensure timely fulfillment of
the needed processes and physical tasks to
avoid dehumanization, fires, pollution and
unpreparedness as well as the fines, litiga-
tion and human costs that come from these
actions.
The complexity of MRF operations –
and the need for more precise and diverse
equipment with higher-speed throughput
– leads smart operators to add fully docu-
mented preventive maintenance and repair
programs that cover every process and
machine in the building. In the best opera-
tions, manufacturer and plant requirements
are broken down in the following ways:
• The employees who use the equipment
are trained on how they fit into the
maintenance process, and they know
how to troubleshoot their particular
equipment with a specific checklist,
either paper or electronic, that is com-
pleted daily.
• Direct supervisors commonly observe
how employees complete the checklist
task and check the output and effective-
ness of the comments with the mainte-
nance team.
• The equipment’s daily, monthly and an-
nual inspection intervals are precise and
are sacrosanct parts of every affected
employee’s job description.
• Obvious risks are dealt with promptly
– for example, defective equipment is
either taken out of service immediately
or made the highest priority mainte-
nance item in the off-shift.
• Work orders are created for any spotted
deficiency, and they only get closed
when the deficiency is corrected.
• Double-checks and sign-offs on main-
tenance work are completed by both
the maintenance supervisor and the
plant operations manager.
• Operators regularly review how the
maintenance system is working through
audits, financial goal achievement, and/
or physical analysis of equipment, and
they offer constructive feedback.
Strong communication of equipment defi-
ciencies will translate into low maintenance
costs and downtime. Interestingly, when
these conditions are present, the mainte-
nance team is somehow more efficient,
happier and seen as more “talented.” In
addition, turnover lowers for this critical
function. There is no magic here. It starts
with managers who understand preventive
maintenance and delegating responsibili-
ty for it to everyone in the value process.
Some of the best facilities have adopted
“lean manufacturing” or “total quality main-
tenance” protocols, or software programs
that automate systems for maintenance,
work orders and parts inventory. Not all
operators have access to these tools, but
skilled managers nonetheless find ways to
build similar homemade approaches. With
any of these best practices, operators should
aim to implement bite-sized processes with
personal accountability, and they should in-
sist on their usage and effective completion.
Limiting easy-to-
control mistakes
For good operations, reliance on simple rou-
tines for individual processes to minimize
mistakes goes far beyond safety, compliance
and maintenance. Other prescriptive, sim-
ple and well-understood checklists for im-
portant routines proliferate. These include:
• Employee annual training cycles
• Required plant start-up and shut-down
procedures and inspection
• Individual equipment basic opera-
tions – procedures should be clearly
posted and be supplemented by regular
trainings
• Municipal contract reporting and other
individual customer requirements
• Cash handling and scale testing daily,
weekly and monthly
• “On-boarding” – plant tour and re-
quired orientation and training for new
employees
26 RR | May 2015
• Outside customer tours
• Housekeeping – daily, weekly, monthly
and annual
These and other important documented
routines become “de rigueur” in well-oper-
ating facilities. To avoid duplication and
lost productivity, the skilled operator often
reviews these real-time checklists or has a
MRF team empowered to improve them.
This process ensures they remain simple,
user friendly, relevant and cover all emerging
points of concern.
Identifying critical processes and
training is key in manufacturing. Complex
MRFs are no different. The best MRF
teams assure proper files and procedures are
documented and remain current. Amazing-
ly, despite a great deal of prescribed routine
and documentation, these same plants seem
to have more time for planning, continuous
improvement projects, customer attention
and employee input. There are simply fewer
mistakes. The best sites spend some of that
extra time creatively enhancing routine pro-
grams to pique interest in their teams. The
boss willingly implements homegrown good
ideas on a process-by-process basis. Though
some operators move their sites to ISO,
LEED and other certified program compli-
ance, the majority of MRFs are not there
yet. However, excellent managers without
such access still succeed. Conversely, oper-
ators who do not attend to process-by-pro-
cess details and improvement rarely prosper
long term.
Champion and
cheerleader
A former president of Columbia’s Teachers
College once explained to me great leader-
ship occurs when the authority maximizes
his or her skillset and plays to the strengths
of individual members of the team. To be
really effective in a fast-moving environment
like a MRF, there is no better advice.
Every individual has a different style
and background, but good operators utilize
their most effective personal attributes, and
find roles and methods of response that res-
onate with their team needs. It is something
I have personally witnessed in every case of
good MRF management. Some effective
facility leaders are quiet and some bois-
terous; some are great with people, while
some are analytical and sparse with talking.
Some are just plain quirky. Not everyone is
a fiery coach, nor a mechanical genius, nor
a good numbers person or an empathetic
team-builder.
However, though different in tem-
perament, good operators share common
principles: They have a sense of human
respect, use effective communication, know
the value of breaking down processes and
emit good energy. Finally, they are confi-
dent in their own style and approach and
use their particular talents to accomplish
goals through their teams. These gifted
operators project their approach consistently
and thoughtfully.
The common characteristics good op-
erators and operations have can be summed
up in eight MRF leadership principles:
1. Captain of the ship
Excellent operators seem present all the time
at the MRFs they call home. Many firms
have tried sharing MRF managers between
campuses for cost savings. But because of
the frequent adjustments in single-stream
MRF labor, equipment settings, materials,
markets and necessary follow-up, the “cost”
of having someone there, with ownership
and visibility, outweighs the “savings” of
sharing leadership between campuses.
MRFs are very complex operations making
a lot of products, and production on any
can get skewed quickly.
A key to making the most of on-site
presence is the old “management by wander-
ing (or walking) around” concept from
Thomas Peters and Robert H. Waterman’s
best-selling book “In Search of Excellence.”
A leader’s availability in the MRF, in safety
meetings, in the scale house, on the floor, in
the maintenance bay and elsewhere involves
a sensual presence of listening as well as
talking, measuring and eyeballing a pro-
cess until new understanding occurs. The
learning is then documented for follow-up
discussions, usually in a public way. To use
a common example, imagine a baler gets
turned off unexpectedly – an attentive man-
ager stops whatever he or she is doing and
moves quickly to investigate the disruption.
Downtime is a reason for urgent reprioriti-
zation.
For another example of responsible
action, consider the build-up of UBC in
the glass residue. An engaged operator will
be seen taking samples back to the office
and then discussing what can be done to
eliminate the loss. Effective operators will
also know to put their foot down appropri-
ately and authoritatively (in their own style),
when they find waste or repeated mistakes.
They may get highly impatient when they
discover a speeding truck on-site and chase
it down for counseling. They also find
ways to communicate their pleasure at high
performance and achievement as soon as
they see it.
When not present, an engaged operator
is highly accessible to employees, customers
and colleagues through electronic commu-
nication, and the leader establishes high
accessibility requirements for all of the team
supervision and staff functions. If some-
thing important arises, details are shared to
the widest appropriate circle of staff.
In sum, this leader likes to be around,
likes to talk about the site with pride and
wants to hear the latest and greatest infor-
mation about the MRF business and flow.
At underperforming locations, the opera-
tor is often hard to find and contact. Not
only does the MRF suffer, consider what a
customer may think of this type manager.
Upon seeing those types of situations, a
friend of mine in the industry would say
he “got the impression that folks were just
pushing piles around in circles” – such a
MRF is like a ship without a rudder.
2. Language of success
The successful operator talks, writes and
teaches in easily understood “MRF lan-
guage.” It begins every shift with team
huddles, during which employees learn of
yesterday’s performance and issues and look
ahead to the coming day’s most important
priorities. The MRF staff members all share
a common dialogue of indicators and mes-
sages. This means communicating simple
goals and corresponding metrics all the way
down to entry-level positions so that key
Record breakers
A while back, an experienced facility man-
ager in California made a graph depicting
pounds recovered per employee hour.
All site hours, including his own, were
included.
Using a three-day rolling average,
this operator would plot the pounds per
employee per hour on a large graph, and
management paid attention to it, commu-
nicating the significance and progress of
the results to workers.
By being consistent, productivity grew
until a ladder was needed to account for
the latest successes in breaking the record.
The eyes of the employees would light up
when a record was broken. The manager
would discuss the metric in the daily shift
huddle, and would occasionally have pizza
served for hitting important milestones.
RR | May 2015 27
measurements become the team’s focus.
Common goals and language are essential to
high productivity and high morale, especial-
ly in work environments filled with noise,
dust and other difficult elements. Humans
want to please and head toward the light.
Providing the light is what good managers
do. Core success metrics are taught, com-
municated and regularly updated, leading to
heightened performance.
3. The mirror of
the MRF
Living half of one’s waking life without basic
feedback is heartbreaking. Yet many man-
agers, who might be talented in areas like
finance, fail to do this with their employees
at MRFs. They stay behind closed doors,
are absent from the site or remain immersed
in endless paperwork. They do not pro-
vide feedback or establish process controls,
emerging only when a preventable crisis
becomes apparent. In this setting, the staff
turnover mounts, the piles do get pushed
in circles, and the plant drifts from crisis to
crisis.
Conversely, the best operators are effec-
tive at constant feedback and use their style
to dispense both praise and discipline in a
believable way. Because they are measuring
for improvement, they communicate when
processes are getting better and talk in easily
understood metrics, like throughput, residue
rates and bale production. They show impa-
tience when conditions worsen, but they
also spread pride and joy with achievement.
There are not enough words to supplement
the science of effective supervision on this
point.
Excellent operators find a personal
rhythm to their style of feedback, embrace its
use, and point out both successes and defi-
ciencies in ways that motivate improvement
in the staff and employees. No favorites are
6. Huddle up
Good MRFs are built on regular commu-
nications cycles where team members and
management meet at defined intervals to set
up goals and corresponding tasks, enabling
production to be its most efficient. Exam-
ples of such practices include:
• Daily pre-shift meetings
• Maintenance planning meetings to
minimize downtime and reduce repair
outages
• Continuous improvement projects,
through which teams are offered time
to improve singular processes. At the
best facilities, three or four improve-
ment projects are in progress at any
given time.
• Financial performance meetings where
key MRF data is shared with key mem-
bers and improvements are discussed
• Staff meetings with updated and prior-
itized agendas, with employee feedback
on major issues, like productivity,
customers, personnel or equipment
• Brief toolbox meetings on particular
pieces of equipment or for short em-
ployee enrichment and training
These meetings tend to be very efficient,
and do not stop production. Pre-shift hud-
dles can be very effective and can be com-
pleted in less than five minutes. Through
dialogue and sharing of the latest plant data,
work becomes more interesting and encul-
turation quicker for the MRF team.
In this way, small teams within the
MRF become “invested” in making their
areas of responsibility run better. This
takes time, employee development and
patience. A MRF is a tough place for
responsible delegation. However, the best
MRFs and operators frequently achieve it.
Things run like clockwork and improve be-
cause the plant team has bought in to the
guiding principles laid out and embodied
by leadership staff.
7. Keep it clean
Housekeeping is often seen as overrated
in single-stream MRFs. It is viewed as
never-ending, taking extra money and not
adding value to the product. The variance
of opinion over its usefulness day-to-day
is often disputed because of its cost. The
pile will be there tomorrow after all. The
literature, however, is clear. Housekeeping
in manufacturing lowers cost by:
played, and the object is the success of the
facility. Catching someone “doing something
right” is just as important as catching some-
one committing errors. Operators should
strive to offer mirror-like feedback – not
doing so is a recipe for failure.
4. Building trust and
teams
When a manager is trusted, the MRF team
will come to leadership with an issue before
it becomes a liability. If the manager is
predictable, available and has some of the
aforementioned traits, employees begin
taking pride in an operation’s accomplish-
ments, and the MRF team becomes self-en-
forcing. When a problem becomes too
big for individual employees, they come to
the operator to solve the issue early. Often
these are potentially threatening issues, like
safety maintenance, or compliance, because
they are understood. Where trust is even
higher, open and early communication may
also develop in regards to the more difficult
HR issues involving subordination, laziness,
harmfulness or inappropriateness. A very
good indicator of an efficiently run facility
is the plant workers adopting the plant stan-
dards and raising them themselves.
5. Allowing individual
growth
Things don’t ever get better in a MRF that
has high turnover and team members that
experience stagnant roles and responsibil-
ities. Buy-in and enculturation are low
in these conditions. However, excellent
operators grow team and individual abili-
ties and prepare team members for higher
levels of responsibility and a correspond-
ing greater sense of self-worth. The plant
may feature “homegrown” heroes who are
admired by other associates and supervis-
ing staff. This is a key indicator to strive
for in any operation.
Such indicators may include a grass-
roots promotion for a one-time temporary
worker, a sort-line captain who has a knack
for keeping the team motivated, a highly
efficient and safe loader operator, or a scale
operator who has excellent relationships
with a contracted city. Many of these em-
ployees will be motivated to stay on the job
for longer careers due to motivation. And,
in the best environments, they over and
over again surprise their leaders with critical
bellwether feedback and innovation as their
skills develop.
Profits through presence
Several years ago, a veteran lead sorter at
a facility in a big Northeast city said of his
new ever-present manager: “That dude
drives me crazy. He may not be as nice
as the last (expletive) manager, but we’re
getting somewhere. I told my wife this job
is starting to make sense.”
It’s little wonder then that particular
MRF’s operating cost almost immediately
went down over 15 percent while safety
and other indicators improved over time.
28 RR | May 2015
• Ensuring compliance with OSHA’s
“clean and orderly and in a sanitary
condition” Standard 1910.22
• Making working conditions tolerable
• Improving sense of pride and moral,
thus increasing productivity
• Preventing accidents and fires
• Reducing waste and disposal costs
• Boosting use of space
• Improving hygienic conditions and
leading to improved health conditions
• Reducing operation and handling time
• Reducing federal, state, and local fines
and penalties
An effective MRF manager can be seen
walking to the fence line of the property
and picking up litter, assigning latrine detail
and doing inspections with the assignees
(without favoritism), having a continuous
painting schedule, and completing organiz-
ing projects like shadow boards, 5S, ISO
and others. If you are at a busy MRF that
is neat and orderly, it does not seem like a
solid waste facility. There may be inevitable
litter, but it vanishes before the end of the
day. Current and potential customers enjoy
visiting the facility, which can lead to more
business. Ultimately, the proof is in the
sweepings: Clean, organized facilities are
generally more profitable than those that are
not, and those attributes are good indicators
of good operations.
8. Promptness and
courtesy as the rule
Lord Admiral Nelson once said that “time
is everything; five minutes make the dif-
ference between victory and defeat.” The
pace of an operation will pick up if the
manager is always on time, starts meetings
on the minute and asks why things are
not running precisely when lunch hour is
over.
Such leaders communicate clearly
and concisely, and remind employees how
valuable time really is by challenging where
they ought to be. In this sense, the man-
ager sees wasting time as a defect, one a
customer (and stockholder for that matter)
is unwilling to pay for. However, the good
operator also always finds a way to take the
time to focus on the team, ask for employee
input and show concern for workers’ lives
and families. The door remains open to
employees.
The recycling landscape today holds
daunting challenges as markets and materi-
als continue to evolve and conditions shift.
A critical component to making it through
stormy seas is having the right internal
leadership and processes. MRFs with good
management hold their own in cost control
and revenue maximization, and can be prof-
itable even in the darkest times.
Michael Timpane is affiliate vice president
for Resource Recycling Systems. He can be
reached at mtimpane@recycle.com.
Reprinted with permission from Resource
Recycling, P.O. Box 42270, Portland, OR
97242-0270; (503) 233-1305, (503) 233-
1356 (fax); www.resource-recycling.com.

More Related Content

What's hot

THE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATION
THE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATIONTHE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATION
THE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATIONDewang Malam
 
Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?
Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?
Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?Garrett Foley
 
002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]
002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]
002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]lcgg59
 
Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205
Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205
Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205Magdalena Anna Fas
 
Responsible asset management in Dubai
Responsible asset management in DubaiResponsible asset management in Dubai
Responsible asset management in DubaiAli Zeeshan
 
Condition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous Improvement
Condition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous ImprovementCondition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous Improvement
Condition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous ImprovementOSIsoft, LLC
 
The business case for process safety final ppt
The business case for process safety final pptThe business case for process safety final ppt
The business case for process safety final pptorosghe
 
An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...
An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...
An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...Lloyd's Register Energy
 
Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...
Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...
Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...Nippin Anand
 
Session no 1 basic contemporary safety concepts
Session no 1 basic contemporary safety conceptsSession no 1 basic contemporary safety concepts
Session no 1 basic contemporary safety conceptssameh shalash
 
The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...
The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...
The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...Jason Johnson
 
Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01syed viquar
 
How to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROL
How to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROLHow to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROL
How to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROLStefan Kovacs
 
Human factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&membersHuman factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&memberssrilestari71
 
2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_Conf
2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_Conf2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_Conf
2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_ConfPeter Poulos
 

What's hot (20)

THE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATION
THE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATIONTHE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATION
THE CRITICALITY OF HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING INTEGRATION
 
Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?
Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?
Analyzing The Near Miss: Are companies overlooking crucial data?
 
002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]
002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]
002 Maintenance M Overview 20 06 06[1]
 
Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205
Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205
Contingency%20planning%20lecture%205
 
Responsible asset management in Dubai
Responsible asset management in DubaiResponsible asset management in Dubai
Responsible asset management in Dubai
 
Loss Control Program Fundamentals
Loss Control Program FundamentalsLoss Control Program Fundamentals
Loss Control Program Fundamentals
 
Condition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous Improvement
Condition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous ImprovementCondition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous Improvement
Condition-Based Maintenance: 10 Steps Towards Continuous Improvement
 
The business case for process safety final ppt
The business case for process safety final pptThe business case for process safety final ppt
The business case for process safety final ppt
 
An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...
An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...
An Organisation-wide Investigation into the Human Factors-Related Causes of H...
 
Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...
Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...
Caught in Numbers, Lost in Focus: What it Means to Manage Safety in Global Sh...
 
Session no 1 basic contemporary safety concepts
Session no 1 basic contemporary safety conceptsSession no 1 basic contemporary safety concepts
Session no 1 basic contemporary safety concepts
 
The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...
The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...
The Future of Maintenance Management: 11 Trends Shaping Your Workplace and Ho...
 
Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01
Media Object File Maint Hum Per Seq01
 
How to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROL
How to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROLHow to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROL
How to perform (or at least try) LOSS CONTROL
 
Human factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&membersHuman factors for crew&members
Human factors for crew&members
 
BCI Counting The Cost
BCI Counting The CostBCI Counting The Cost
BCI Counting The Cost
 
Maintenance strategies
Maintenance strategiesMaintenance strategies
Maintenance strategies
 
ادارة المرافق
ادارة المرافقادارة المرافق
ادارة المرافق
 
2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_Conf
2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_Conf2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_Conf
2009_NYC_OpRiskUSA_Conf
 
Process safety management system
Process safety management systemProcess safety management system
Process safety management system
 

Viewers also liked

Prezentacja
PrezentacjaPrezentacja
Prezentacjaewa xxx
 
RR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-Timpane
RR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-TimpaneRR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-Timpane
RR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-TimpaneMichael Timpane
 
My proyect of life
My proyect of lifeMy proyect of life
My proyect of life98010259169
 
Timpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22april
Timpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22aprilTimpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22april
Timpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22aprilMichael Timpane
 
Single stream and dual stream_rr
Single stream and dual stream_rrSingle stream and dual stream_rr
Single stream and dual stream_rrMichael Timpane
 
PintUrl.com
PintUrl.comPintUrl.com
PintUrl.comPintUrl
 
Combining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical Data
Combining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical DataCombining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical Data
Combining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical Datarusselltamr
 

Viewers also liked (11)

scan
scanscan
scan
 
NWRA Update Friday 515
NWRA Update Friday 515NWRA Update Friday 515
NWRA Update Friday 515
 
Prezentacja
PrezentacjaPrezentacja
Prezentacja
 
RR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-Timpane
RR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-TimpaneRR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-Timpane
RR-Ship-Shape-Oct-2015-RRS-Timpane
 
My proyect of life
My proyect of lifeMy proyect of life
My proyect of life
 
Timpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22april
Timpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22aprilTimpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22april
Timpane0415rr article- %22Negotiating the Single Stream%22april
 
Single stream and dual stream_rr
Single stream and dual stream_rrSingle stream and dual stream_rr
Single stream and dual stream_rr
 
PintUrl.com
PintUrl.comPintUrl.com
PintUrl.com
 
Square
Square Square
Square
 
VIDA Y OBRA
VIDA Y OBRAVIDA Y OBRA
VIDA Y OBRA
 
Combining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical Data
Combining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical DataCombining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical Data
Combining Human+Machine Intelligence to Successfully Integrate Biomedical Data
 

Similar to MasterCommanderMay15Final copy

01 facility management definition and scope opt
01   facility management definition and scope opt01   facility management definition and scope opt
01 facility management definition and scope optArya Wirabhuana
 
Process Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh Rajput
Process Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh RajputProcess Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh Rajput
Process Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh RajputGaurav Singh Rajput
 
Hsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systems
Hsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systemsHsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systems
Hsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systemsMayank Agrawal
 
Twelve Things ... Use Procedures
Twelve Things ... Use ProceduresTwelve Things ... Use Procedures
Twelve Things ... Use ProceduresPMHaas
 
Alarm information sheet
Alarm information sheet   Alarm information sheet
Alarm information sheet Anand Mishra
 
IBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdf
IBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdfIBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdf
IBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdfPhanThnh52
 
Program DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docx
Program DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docxProgram DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docx
Program DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docxbriancrawford30935
 
Pipeline Construction In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident Project
Pipeline Construction   In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident ProjectPipeline Construction   In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident Project
Pipeline Construction In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident ProjectPeter Kinsey
 
What Have Been Due to large number.pdf
What Have Been Due to large number.pdfWhat Have Been Due to large number.pdf
What Have Been Due to large number.pdfsdfghj21
 
Careers Australia Question 1 ca whs activity
Careers Australia Question 1 ca whs activityCareers Australia Question 1 ca whs activity
Careers Australia Question 1 ca whs activityBluecare
 
MFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docx
MFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docxMFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docx
MFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docxARIV4
 
Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc.
Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc. Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc.
Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc. Energy Network marcus evans
 
Assessing Obsolescence
Assessing ObsolescenceAssessing Obsolescence
Assessing ObsolescenceCognizant
 

Similar to MasterCommanderMay15Final copy (20)

01 facility management definition and scope opt
01   facility management definition and scope opt01   facility management definition and scope opt
01 facility management definition and scope opt
 
Facility management
Facility managementFacility management
Facility management
 
Process Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh Rajput
Process Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh RajputProcess Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh Rajput
Process Safety Awareness | PSM | Gaurav Singh Rajput
 
Hsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systems
Hsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systemsHsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systems
Hsg250 guidance on_permit_to_work_systems
 
Twelve Things ... Use Procedures
Twelve Things ... Use ProceduresTwelve Things ... Use Procedures
Twelve Things ... Use Procedures
 
Alarm information sheet
Alarm information sheet   Alarm information sheet
Alarm information sheet
 
Importance of O&M
Importance of O&MImportance of O&M
Importance of O&M
 
IBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdf
IBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdfIBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdf
IBM Maximo HSE Solution Presentation.pdf
 
10420140501001
1042014050100110420140501001
10420140501001
 
Auditing supply chain risk_management
Auditing supply chain risk_management Auditing supply chain risk_management
Auditing supply chain risk_management
 
Program DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docx
Program DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docxProgram DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docx
Program DevelopmentPeer-ReviewedManagementofCExamp.docx
 
Pipeline Construction In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident Project
Pipeline Construction   In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident ProjectPipeline Construction   In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident Project
Pipeline Construction In Pursuit Of The Zero Accident Project
 
What Have Been Due to large number.pdf
What Have Been Due to large number.pdfWhat Have Been Due to large number.pdf
What Have Been Due to large number.pdf
 
Careers Australia Question 1 ca whs activity
Careers Australia Question 1 ca whs activityCareers Australia Question 1 ca whs activity
Careers Australia Question 1 ca whs activity
 
MFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docx
MFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docxMFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docx
MFC )UPNEWS & INFORMATIONFind more productsupplier info.docx
 
Maintenance
MaintenanceMaintenance
Maintenance
 
Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc.
Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc. Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc.
Improving Power Plant Performance & Safety-David Orme, Ranger Steel Inc.
 
Assessing Obsolescence
Assessing ObsolescenceAssessing Obsolescence
Assessing Obsolescence
 
Investigating Critical Risk Incidents
Investigating Critical Risk IncidentsInvestigating Critical Risk Incidents
Investigating Critical Risk Incidents
 
risk paper
risk paperrisk paper
risk paper
 

MasterCommanderMay15Final copy

  • 1. C hapter 1 of this complete look at the issues and concerns sur- rounding the modern materials recovery facility, published in the April issue of Resource Recycling, ended with the follow- ing comment: “With rising costs, falling revenues and long-term contract obligations, there are more than a few stories of insufficient revenues to cover operations costs and contract responsibilities like commodity rebates and public education programs.” What materials recovery facility can overcome the daunting challenges of change and financial crisis today? After visiting well over 250 MRFs over the past two decades, I have witnessed many valuable attributes that the best MRF operators possess, regardless of individual management styles. The best practices developed by those managers may prove invaluable for operators under pressure in today’s environment. There are excellent operators working for all the major profes- sional MRF service providers. My former company, Waste Manage- ment, had some of the best facilities and managers I have personally observed. Excellence can also be found at many other companies, including large haulers, independent professionals and integrat- ed paper mill operations. There are, of course, poorly operated facilities with easily spotted indicators, which can be found at an alarming number of MRF sites – and generally stem from a lack of training, acumen or control. A good operator can make a giant swing in the success of a MRF in a short period of time. The bottom-line impacts can be very large – to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars a month. I have seen this phenomenon play out at three different public companies over the last 40 years. What is the special com- bination of skills and approaches applied by gifted leaders to get through tough times and the swings of the recycling business? Ex- ternal considerations, such as customer needs and talent acquisition, are important, and they’ll be explored in this series at a later date. For now, let’s look for answers within the MRF operation itself and the managers who set the pace at top-performing facilities. Safety – no room for error A skilled MRF manager will start by ensuring a successful safety program, with identifiable characteristics. It begins with energy. Good leaders will “sniff out” the lowering of standards and call immediate attention to approaching threats to safety. Strong MRF operators will also stop what they are doing and shut down produc- tion upon the discovery of serious unsafe acts and incidents – such as open electric panels, incomplete safety checklists, an unsafe loader being put back into service. In these instances, the operator calls the team together to point out the safety deficiency and makes it clear he or she will not tolerate repeats of the same incident. It’s also important to establish and reward improving safety goals and celebrate employee and plant milestones, such as the avoidance of lost workdays or a significant period of time with no reportable accidents. If rogue employees or MRF users, such as third-party trucks tipping on the MRF tip floors, fail to follow the safety rules or are determined to be a threat, they are weeded out professionally. There are also regular safety meetings for all workers and brief toolbox safety huddles every shift. The accident rate will be low, and morale will be high – a well-operated MRF is a place where safe practices are trained, understood and followed. Energetic MRF safety programs are an excellent indicator of healthy plants. OSHA representatives are now common visitors to MRFs, which are increasingly complex and potentially dangerous environ- MasterAND Commander OF THE MRF In the second story in an ongoing series about the modern MRF, our author shares expert advice on how to run a single-stream facility in the face of volatile markets, increasing complexity and financial pressures. BY MICHAEL TIMPANE Reprinted from 24 RR | May 2015
  • 2. RR | May 2015 25 ments. Since 1990, there have been over 80 deaths due to forklifts and balers in the U.S., and many of these fatal incidents took place at MRFs and transfer stations. There have also been fatalities due to conveyor accidents, lack of traffic or energy control, and crushing and falling. An OSHA visit can literally put a MRF out of business, especially if the visit is due to a fatality or other serious accident. However, there is nothing intrinsically hazardous in a MRF if proper protocols are put into place and enforced. Most MRF locations long ago adopted a zero-tolerance policy for poor OSHA compliance for per- sonal protective equipment, hazcom/right- to-know, confined spaces, proper lockout/ tagout energy control, equipment guarding, safety signage and other areas. Yet deaths still occur when OSHA standards aren’t followed in MRFs, and, gallingly, some managers do not even wear appropriate personal protective equipment themselves while on-site. A good operator knows accidents are very expensive in human costs, lost time, productivity and potential litigation. Some have cost MRF operators millions of dollars. To avoid mistakes, safety checklists should be used for daily inspections of equipment, building and traffic control. The lists can cover numerous guidelines including: those from an equipment manu- facturer, revised Z245.41 ANSI standards, OSHA minimum standards, and MRF continuous improvement team local safety recommendations. At well-run operations, cascading and simple safety checklists are also assigned to trained personnel – such as sort-line captains, maintenance technicians and equipment operators – for pre-shift inspection and are collected for frequent review. Such checklists are updated and controlled with care and are acted upon immediately to correct deficiencies when noted. Additionally, safety procedures and warning signs – with simple, visual, mul- tilingual messages – for all employees are posted near all energy sources, maintenance areas, elevated platforms, tip floors and storage areas. The maintenance of signs and other warnings, like pedestrian-restricted pathways, are made a priority, and they are kept clean, easily identified and understood. In this system, reviewing daily safety rules and implementing predictable correction and enforcement activities actually leads to encouraged employees offering good ideas on their own. An effective operator creatively makes the safety system a welcomed part of the culture, instead of the dirge of unnecessary paperwork. “Safety speak,” milestones and concern for fellow employees become a part of the common pride in the plant. Attitude of compliance When the retired Bill Ruckelshaus, former chief of the U.S. EPA, came to BFI over 25 years ago, the company leadership adopted an “obsession with compliance” in regards to regulation, and its MRF operations were no exception. The guidelines also required compliance with even-tougher internal rules regarding equal opportunity, overtime pay, emergency response, spill prevention, storm- water discharge, fire codes, reporting and a host of other site mandates. This attitude became the industry standard, through the great work of pioneers such as Lloyd Andrew, Bob Davis, Nat Egosi and Susan Eppes. Great plants regu- larly and formally review their compliance obligations and ensure timely fulfillment of the needed processes and physical tasks to avoid dehumanization, fires, pollution and unpreparedness as well as the fines, litiga- tion and human costs that come from these actions. The complexity of MRF operations – and the need for more precise and diverse equipment with higher-speed throughput – leads smart operators to add fully docu- mented preventive maintenance and repair programs that cover every process and machine in the building. In the best opera- tions, manufacturer and plant requirements are broken down in the following ways: • The employees who use the equipment are trained on how they fit into the maintenance process, and they know how to troubleshoot their particular equipment with a specific checklist, either paper or electronic, that is com- pleted daily. • Direct supervisors commonly observe how employees complete the checklist task and check the output and effective- ness of the comments with the mainte- nance team. • The equipment’s daily, monthly and an- nual inspection intervals are precise and are sacrosanct parts of every affected employee’s job description. • Obvious risks are dealt with promptly – for example, defective equipment is either taken out of service immediately or made the highest priority mainte- nance item in the off-shift. • Work orders are created for any spotted deficiency, and they only get closed when the deficiency is corrected. • Double-checks and sign-offs on main- tenance work are completed by both the maintenance supervisor and the plant operations manager. • Operators regularly review how the maintenance system is working through audits, financial goal achievement, and/ or physical analysis of equipment, and they offer constructive feedback. Strong communication of equipment defi- ciencies will translate into low maintenance costs and downtime. Interestingly, when these conditions are present, the mainte- nance team is somehow more efficient, happier and seen as more “talented.” In addition, turnover lowers for this critical function. There is no magic here. It starts with managers who understand preventive maintenance and delegating responsibili- ty for it to everyone in the value process. Some of the best facilities have adopted “lean manufacturing” or “total quality main- tenance” protocols, or software programs that automate systems for maintenance, work orders and parts inventory. Not all operators have access to these tools, but skilled managers nonetheless find ways to build similar homemade approaches. With any of these best practices, operators should aim to implement bite-sized processes with personal accountability, and they should in- sist on their usage and effective completion. Limiting easy-to- control mistakes For good operations, reliance on simple rou- tines for individual processes to minimize mistakes goes far beyond safety, compliance and maintenance. Other prescriptive, sim- ple and well-understood checklists for im- portant routines proliferate. These include: • Employee annual training cycles • Required plant start-up and shut-down procedures and inspection • Individual equipment basic opera- tions – procedures should be clearly posted and be supplemented by regular trainings • Municipal contract reporting and other individual customer requirements • Cash handling and scale testing daily, weekly and monthly • “On-boarding” – plant tour and re- quired orientation and training for new employees
  • 3. 26 RR | May 2015 • Outside customer tours • Housekeeping – daily, weekly, monthly and annual These and other important documented routines become “de rigueur” in well-oper- ating facilities. To avoid duplication and lost productivity, the skilled operator often reviews these real-time checklists or has a MRF team empowered to improve them. This process ensures they remain simple, user friendly, relevant and cover all emerging points of concern. Identifying critical processes and training is key in manufacturing. Complex MRFs are no different. The best MRF teams assure proper files and procedures are documented and remain current. Amazing- ly, despite a great deal of prescribed routine and documentation, these same plants seem to have more time for planning, continuous improvement projects, customer attention and employee input. There are simply fewer mistakes. The best sites spend some of that extra time creatively enhancing routine pro- grams to pique interest in their teams. The boss willingly implements homegrown good ideas on a process-by-process basis. Though some operators move their sites to ISO, LEED and other certified program compli- ance, the majority of MRFs are not there yet. However, excellent managers without such access still succeed. Conversely, oper- ators who do not attend to process-by-pro- cess details and improvement rarely prosper long term. Champion and cheerleader A former president of Columbia’s Teachers College once explained to me great leader- ship occurs when the authority maximizes his or her skillset and plays to the strengths of individual members of the team. To be really effective in a fast-moving environment like a MRF, there is no better advice. Every individual has a different style and background, but good operators utilize their most effective personal attributes, and find roles and methods of response that res- onate with their team needs. It is something I have personally witnessed in every case of good MRF management. Some effective facility leaders are quiet and some bois- terous; some are great with people, while some are analytical and sparse with talking. Some are just plain quirky. Not everyone is a fiery coach, nor a mechanical genius, nor a good numbers person or an empathetic team-builder. However, though different in tem- perament, good operators share common principles: They have a sense of human respect, use effective communication, know the value of breaking down processes and emit good energy. Finally, they are confi- dent in their own style and approach and use their particular talents to accomplish goals through their teams. These gifted operators project their approach consistently and thoughtfully. The common characteristics good op- erators and operations have can be summed up in eight MRF leadership principles: 1. Captain of the ship Excellent operators seem present all the time at the MRFs they call home. Many firms have tried sharing MRF managers between campuses for cost savings. But because of the frequent adjustments in single-stream MRF labor, equipment settings, materials, markets and necessary follow-up, the “cost” of having someone there, with ownership and visibility, outweighs the “savings” of sharing leadership between campuses. MRFs are very complex operations making a lot of products, and production on any can get skewed quickly. A key to making the most of on-site presence is the old “management by wander- ing (or walking) around” concept from Thomas Peters and Robert H. Waterman’s best-selling book “In Search of Excellence.” A leader’s availability in the MRF, in safety meetings, in the scale house, on the floor, in the maintenance bay and elsewhere involves a sensual presence of listening as well as talking, measuring and eyeballing a pro- cess until new understanding occurs. The learning is then documented for follow-up discussions, usually in a public way. To use a common example, imagine a baler gets turned off unexpectedly – an attentive man- ager stops whatever he or she is doing and moves quickly to investigate the disruption. Downtime is a reason for urgent reprioriti- zation. For another example of responsible action, consider the build-up of UBC in the glass residue. An engaged operator will be seen taking samples back to the office and then discussing what can be done to eliminate the loss. Effective operators will also know to put their foot down appropri- ately and authoritatively (in their own style), when they find waste or repeated mistakes. They may get highly impatient when they discover a speeding truck on-site and chase it down for counseling. They also find ways to communicate their pleasure at high performance and achievement as soon as they see it. When not present, an engaged operator is highly accessible to employees, customers and colleagues through electronic commu- nication, and the leader establishes high accessibility requirements for all of the team supervision and staff functions. If some- thing important arises, details are shared to the widest appropriate circle of staff. In sum, this leader likes to be around, likes to talk about the site with pride and wants to hear the latest and greatest infor- mation about the MRF business and flow. At underperforming locations, the opera- tor is often hard to find and contact. Not only does the MRF suffer, consider what a customer may think of this type manager. Upon seeing those types of situations, a friend of mine in the industry would say he “got the impression that folks were just pushing piles around in circles” – such a MRF is like a ship without a rudder. 2. Language of success The successful operator talks, writes and teaches in easily understood “MRF lan- guage.” It begins every shift with team huddles, during which employees learn of yesterday’s performance and issues and look ahead to the coming day’s most important priorities. The MRF staff members all share a common dialogue of indicators and mes- sages. This means communicating simple goals and corresponding metrics all the way down to entry-level positions so that key Record breakers A while back, an experienced facility man- ager in California made a graph depicting pounds recovered per employee hour. All site hours, including his own, were included. Using a three-day rolling average, this operator would plot the pounds per employee per hour on a large graph, and management paid attention to it, commu- nicating the significance and progress of the results to workers. By being consistent, productivity grew until a ladder was needed to account for the latest successes in breaking the record. The eyes of the employees would light up when a record was broken. The manager would discuss the metric in the daily shift huddle, and would occasionally have pizza served for hitting important milestones.
  • 4. RR | May 2015 27 measurements become the team’s focus. Common goals and language are essential to high productivity and high morale, especial- ly in work environments filled with noise, dust and other difficult elements. Humans want to please and head toward the light. Providing the light is what good managers do. Core success metrics are taught, com- municated and regularly updated, leading to heightened performance. 3. The mirror of the MRF Living half of one’s waking life without basic feedback is heartbreaking. Yet many man- agers, who might be talented in areas like finance, fail to do this with their employees at MRFs. They stay behind closed doors, are absent from the site or remain immersed in endless paperwork. They do not pro- vide feedback or establish process controls, emerging only when a preventable crisis becomes apparent. In this setting, the staff turnover mounts, the piles do get pushed in circles, and the plant drifts from crisis to crisis. Conversely, the best operators are effec- tive at constant feedback and use their style to dispense both praise and discipline in a believable way. Because they are measuring for improvement, they communicate when processes are getting better and talk in easily understood metrics, like throughput, residue rates and bale production. They show impa- tience when conditions worsen, but they also spread pride and joy with achievement. There are not enough words to supplement the science of effective supervision on this point. Excellent operators find a personal rhythm to their style of feedback, embrace its use, and point out both successes and defi- ciencies in ways that motivate improvement in the staff and employees. No favorites are 6. Huddle up Good MRFs are built on regular commu- nications cycles where team members and management meet at defined intervals to set up goals and corresponding tasks, enabling production to be its most efficient. Exam- ples of such practices include: • Daily pre-shift meetings • Maintenance planning meetings to minimize downtime and reduce repair outages • Continuous improvement projects, through which teams are offered time to improve singular processes. At the best facilities, three or four improve- ment projects are in progress at any given time. • Financial performance meetings where key MRF data is shared with key mem- bers and improvements are discussed • Staff meetings with updated and prior- itized agendas, with employee feedback on major issues, like productivity, customers, personnel or equipment • Brief toolbox meetings on particular pieces of equipment or for short em- ployee enrichment and training These meetings tend to be very efficient, and do not stop production. Pre-shift hud- dles can be very effective and can be com- pleted in less than five minutes. Through dialogue and sharing of the latest plant data, work becomes more interesting and encul- turation quicker for the MRF team. In this way, small teams within the MRF become “invested” in making their areas of responsibility run better. This takes time, employee development and patience. A MRF is a tough place for responsible delegation. However, the best MRFs and operators frequently achieve it. Things run like clockwork and improve be- cause the plant team has bought in to the guiding principles laid out and embodied by leadership staff. 7. Keep it clean Housekeeping is often seen as overrated in single-stream MRFs. It is viewed as never-ending, taking extra money and not adding value to the product. The variance of opinion over its usefulness day-to-day is often disputed because of its cost. The pile will be there tomorrow after all. The literature, however, is clear. Housekeeping in manufacturing lowers cost by: played, and the object is the success of the facility. Catching someone “doing something right” is just as important as catching some- one committing errors. Operators should strive to offer mirror-like feedback – not doing so is a recipe for failure. 4. Building trust and teams When a manager is trusted, the MRF team will come to leadership with an issue before it becomes a liability. If the manager is predictable, available and has some of the aforementioned traits, employees begin taking pride in an operation’s accomplish- ments, and the MRF team becomes self-en- forcing. When a problem becomes too big for individual employees, they come to the operator to solve the issue early. Often these are potentially threatening issues, like safety maintenance, or compliance, because they are understood. Where trust is even higher, open and early communication may also develop in regards to the more difficult HR issues involving subordination, laziness, harmfulness or inappropriateness. A very good indicator of an efficiently run facility is the plant workers adopting the plant stan- dards and raising them themselves. 5. Allowing individual growth Things don’t ever get better in a MRF that has high turnover and team members that experience stagnant roles and responsibil- ities. Buy-in and enculturation are low in these conditions. However, excellent operators grow team and individual abili- ties and prepare team members for higher levels of responsibility and a correspond- ing greater sense of self-worth. The plant may feature “homegrown” heroes who are admired by other associates and supervis- ing staff. This is a key indicator to strive for in any operation. Such indicators may include a grass- roots promotion for a one-time temporary worker, a sort-line captain who has a knack for keeping the team motivated, a highly efficient and safe loader operator, or a scale operator who has excellent relationships with a contracted city. Many of these em- ployees will be motivated to stay on the job for longer careers due to motivation. And, in the best environments, they over and over again surprise their leaders with critical bellwether feedback and innovation as their skills develop. Profits through presence Several years ago, a veteran lead sorter at a facility in a big Northeast city said of his new ever-present manager: “That dude drives me crazy. He may not be as nice as the last (expletive) manager, but we’re getting somewhere. I told my wife this job is starting to make sense.” It’s little wonder then that particular MRF’s operating cost almost immediately went down over 15 percent while safety and other indicators improved over time.
  • 5. 28 RR | May 2015 • Ensuring compliance with OSHA’s “clean and orderly and in a sanitary condition” Standard 1910.22 • Making working conditions tolerable • Improving sense of pride and moral, thus increasing productivity • Preventing accidents and fires • Reducing waste and disposal costs • Boosting use of space • Improving hygienic conditions and leading to improved health conditions • Reducing operation and handling time • Reducing federal, state, and local fines and penalties An effective MRF manager can be seen walking to the fence line of the property and picking up litter, assigning latrine detail and doing inspections with the assignees (without favoritism), having a continuous painting schedule, and completing organiz- ing projects like shadow boards, 5S, ISO and others. If you are at a busy MRF that is neat and orderly, it does not seem like a solid waste facility. There may be inevitable litter, but it vanishes before the end of the day. Current and potential customers enjoy visiting the facility, which can lead to more business. Ultimately, the proof is in the sweepings: Clean, organized facilities are generally more profitable than those that are not, and those attributes are good indicators of good operations. 8. Promptness and courtesy as the rule Lord Admiral Nelson once said that “time is everything; five minutes make the dif- ference between victory and defeat.” The pace of an operation will pick up if the manager is always on time, starts meetings on the minute and asks why things are not running precisely when lunch hour is over. Such leaders communicate clearly and concisely, and remind employees how valuable time really is by challenging where they ought to be. In this sense, the man- ager sees wasting time as a defect, one a customer (and stockholder for that matter) is unwilling to pay for. However, the good operator also always finds a way to take the time to focus on the team, ask for employee input and show concern for workers’ lives and families. The door remains open to employees. The recycling landscape today holds daunting challenges as markets and materi- als continue to evolve and conditions shift. A critical component to making it through stormy seas is having the right internal leadership and processes. MRFs with good management hold their own in cost control and revenue maximization, and can be prof- itable even in the darkest times. Michael Timpane is affiliate vice president for Resource Recycling Systems. He can be reached at mtimpane@recycle.com. Reprinted with permission from Resource Recycling, P.O. Box 42270, Portland, OR 97242-0270; (503) 233-1305, (503) 233- 1356 (fax); www.resource-recycling.com.