05 t kecskes

421 views

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
421
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
10
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

05 t kecskes

  1. 1. 4TH MERIAL FORUM HAVE WE GOT PCVD &SWINE INFLUENZA UNDER CONTROL?
  2. 2. Benefits of CIRCOVAC piglet vaccination in Hungary Dr. Tamas Kecskes
  3. 3. PCVD• First cases in 1991• Described in 1996
  4. 4. PCV2 in Hungary First detection in 1999 On our farms in 2000 Losses up to 25% only in the nursery Back to the normal production in 12-18 months, PCVD became on endemic diseaes
  5. 5. PCV2 in Hungary Problems moved to the finishing phase Periodically new outbreaks First vaccine for piglets available in Hungary in 2009
  6. 6. Objective of the trialTo compare the efficacy of CIRCOVACand another PCV2 piglet vaccine
  7. 7. Farm• 600 sows farrow to finish commercial farm• Depop-repop, reconstruction in 2010• High health status (free from PRRS, App, swine dysentery)
  8. 8. Trial• Weekly batches• 16 weeks from august 2011• 3 groups (320-350 piglets each) Group A Group B Group CCIRCOVAC at 3 CIRCOVAC/Suvaxyn PCV2/M. hyo comboweeks of age M.hyo One combo 3 weeks of ageSuvaxyn M.hyo One 3 weeks of ageat weaning
  9. 9. Results in nursery Weight at end Total Weaning of nursery losses n weight (kg) (kg) % ADWGGroup A 1347 9.0 a 34.62 a 0.70 547 aGroup B 1332 10.22 b 40.14 b 0.90 634 bGroup C 2766 8.88 a 35.80 ab 0.98 571 ab
  10. 10. Results in fatteners Start Slaughter weight weight Total losses n (kg) (kg) % FCR ADWGGroup A 1337 34.62 a 112.3 a 2.26 2.86 a 788Group B 1320 40.14 b 117.1 b 2.43 3.08 b 790Group C 2739 35.80 ab 112.8 ab 2.31 2.98 c 775
  11. 11. ADWG (g/d) wean to finish by batch850800750700650600550500 Group A450 Group B400350 Group C300250200150100 50 0
  12. 12. ADWG (g/d) wean to finish
  13. 13. Results: summary Total ADWG Weaning Slaughter losses Wean to n weight (kg) weight (kg) (%) finishGroup A 1347 9.0 112.3 3.19 709Group B 1332 10.22 117.1 3.71 739Group C 2766 8.88 112.8 3.11 709
  14. 14. ConclusionNo significant difference in the 3vaccination methods comparing the lossesand the ADWGFCR was better for the CIRCOVAC groupthen for the other vaccine
  15. 15. Thank you for your attention !

×