2. Since its founding in 1997, Star Alliance had developed an
expertly organized and managed network of
global airlines over the course of 23 years.2 In 2020, however,
the airline faced a new and unforeseen
challenge: the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath. Suddenly,
the world’s airline industry had to decide
how to respond to a global crisis. Even before the outbreak of
the COVID-19 pandemic, Star Alliance was
already facing critical issues related to its organization and
strategy. Its success had always depended on
effective management of the network’s member airlines. That
factor would prove even more critical during
the pandemic, when airline travel suddenly and unexpectedly
dropped to half of its original volume across
the world, and was not expected to regain its status for some
time. For over 20 years, Star Alliance members
had contributed value to the alliance and reaped numerous
benefits in return that helped them become strong
competitors. Other airlines, recognizing the value and strength
of an alliance, had formed their own rival
airline networks. Would this strategy help airlines survive the
COVID-19 crisis? Was group-based
competition needed to thrive during a pandemic?
THE GLOBAL AIRLINE INDUSTRY
The COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020 and spread
across the globe. In response, severe travel
restrictions were introduced in all countries. As demand for
travel plummeted, passenger occupancy in
planes declined, and health and safety costs mounted. All
airlines sought emergency funding wherever they
3. could, usually from their home governments. Observers
recognized that the future of the industry was being
reshaped, although what new form it would take was unclear.
Before attempting to accurately predict the
airline industry’s future, understanding its history and economic
fundamentals was necessary.
During the preceding decades, the global airline industry had
been transformed by new regulatory policies and
company strategies. The United States deregulated pricing and
domestic routes in 1978 and the European Union
followed suit in 1997. Although regulatory hurdles still
prevented cross-border mergers in many countries,3
airlines were able to pursue various new strategies. One strategy
global airlines used to extend their global reach
was a bilateral and multi-partner alliance, known in the industry
as a “constellation.”4
Star Alliance was created in May 1997 by an agreement among
five international airlines: Deutsche
Lufthansa AG (Lufthansa), United Airlines Inc. (United), Air
Canada, Thai Airways International Public
Co, and Scandinavian Airways System. The following year, four
more airlines joined the alliance: Varig,
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
8. regularly and steadily from that point. The main goal of the
founding members was to expand their global
network of service and attain many of the synergies that a
merger provided, while maintaining their
independent identities. Two years later, two new airline
alliances emerged with a plan to reap the same
benefits that Star Alliance seemed to be enjoying. Oneworld
was formed by founding members American
Airlines Inc. (American) and British Airways, and SkyTeam was
formed the next year by Delta Air Lines
Inc. (Delta), Air France, and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.5
The Rise of Airline Constellations
Star Alliance was a new type of organizational structure in the
airline industry but one that would soon
become relatively common. This structure consisted of multiple
member airlines enabling collaboration in
certain activities, within limits. Antitrust rules did not allow
sharing specific types of information,
coordinating pricing, or sharing profits.6 However, each
member paid a share of the costs of the organization
and had specific rights in the governance of joint activities.
Historically, airline alliances had been bilateral —that is,
between two companies. In 1998, for example,
Air France was part of 24 different bilateral alliances with
different airlines across the globe—all of them
remaining distinct and separate.7 Star Alliance, however,
grouped such relationships into one network and
coordinated bilateral arrangements between member companies.
Multi-partner alliances established
common branding and standards for the various member
airlines. In some cases, the alliance helped its
members aggregate large aircraft purchases.
9. Initially, Star Alliance relied mainly on its two largest
members—United and Lufthansa. In 1999, these two
airlines together served 578 destinations in 106 countries. By
2020, Star Alliance had grown its membership
to 26 airlines and served over 1,300 destinations in 195
countries (Exhibit 1). However, multi-partner
alliances in the global airline industry were a common practice
even before Star Alliance formed its
network. In 1989, Delta had formed a network of three airlines
with Swissair AG/SA and Singapore
Airlines. Star Alliance then formed the first major network
several years later, in 1997. Rivalry among large
constellations soon flourished when American and British
Airways joined Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. and
Qantas Airways Limited to launch Oneworld in 1999, and the
next year Aerovías de México S.A. de C.V.
(Aeroméxico), Air France, Delta, and Korean Air Co. Ltd.
joined together to form SkyTeam.8
Like Star Alliance, the other two constellations also expanded
over the years, adding and replacing members
over time (see Exhibit 2). In 2017, the three major airline
alliances had built immense networks, accounting
for almost 58 per cent of the industry’s total global capacity.9
By 2020, each group had a footing in every
major region of the globe.
BENEFITS OF STAR ALLIANCE
Traditional airline profitability boiled down to only a few key
drivers of revenue and cost. The main revenue
drivers were passenger capacity, load factor, and yield. Pricing
of flights could vary, often in response to
the degree of competition in the route. The percentage of seats
10. that were occupied on a flight, known as
load factor, was an important indicator of profitability. Mileage
programs were used to promote customer
loyalty, develop future business, and increase liquidity. Credit
card partners involved in these programs
bought miles for their customers in advance of when they would
be used. On the other side of revenue, the
main drivers of cost were labour (i.e., flight personnel), fuel,
and advertising.
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
o
nl
y
by
x
us
ha
n
li
in
14. ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
Page 3 9B21M010
Star Alliance members sought to gain from the network in many
ways. The alliance provided members
access to destinations outside of their home base. Coordinating
arrival and departure times allowed the
group to operate an efficient network with high load and tight
connections, which was known as codeshare
synchronization. The constellations also promised better
customer service by allowing the airlines to share
lounges, mileage programs, and various costs in other areas.
Members could also take advantage of
common standards, combined training programs, and the
alliance’s brand identity, while maintaining their
own independent status.
Network Optimization
Star Alliance offered its member airlines an extended hub-and-
spoke system, which was considered a key
15. competitive advantage. The hub-and-spoke system first became
popular in domestic air travel in the United
States after deregulation of the route structure. In this system,
the main airports in the country served as
hubs, through which passengers were channelled to and from
various spoke airports that connected the hub
to the ultimate destinations.10 For example, Star Alliance made
it possible for United passengers to travel
to Munich, Hamburg, Frankfurt, and other German cities
through the Dusseldorf hub. Similarly, because
Lufthansa did not fly to Denver, New Orleans, Honolulu, or
Seattle in the United States from Frankfurt,
Germany, its passengers could fly to Chicago and United would
then take them to their ultimate US
destinations. For a given route (e.g., New York, United States to
Frankfurt, Germany), one partner would
bring passengers to a hub airport from spoke locations and take
them to destinations beyond a partner’s hub
airport on the other side of the route. This service, which was
referred to as using a bridge, was enabled by
the network structure of such alliances (see Exhibit 3).
In 2016, Star Alliance introduced an additional co-operative
relationship called “connecting partners” in an
effort to augment its global network. Partner carriers would be
able to connect to the Star Alliance network
without becoming full alliance members. However, passengers
would be offered connections only to the
flights of connecting partners according to certain status-based
privileges. Juneyao Airlines was announced
as the first connecting partner in October 2016.11
With the hub-and-spoke system becoming widespread, most
major airports became dominated by a single
large carrier. Limited availability of landing slots, gates, and
takeoff times made it difficult for other carriers
16. to serve new locations. This advantage, combined with other
benefits, resulted in increased revenues for
Star Alliance members. By 2019, combined Star Alliance
member revenues reached over US$200 billion12
(see Exhibit 4).13 The organization also had the largest
membership list, the most seats, the highest revenues,
and the fastest growth, although other constellations were not
far behind (see Exhibit 5).
Joint Purchases
Another objective of airline alliances was to combine purchases
and increase each member’s buyer power,
as the chief executive officer (CEO) of United noted: “About
one-third of United’s costs involve people.
But the other two-thirds represent enormous opportunities for
working together, for buying, purchasing,
and co-operating among the group.”14 Potential economies of
scale were available to members through joint
purchasing in several areas. The annual combined amount of
Star Alliance member purchases of goods and
services was approximatel y $15 billion. This amount included
expenses for office equipment, fuel, catering,
and maintenance, but excluded aircraft purchases.15
In 1998, United claimed to have saved $20 million due to a total
$1.5 billion in combined purchased
services. In 2014, all Star Alliance carriers serving London’s
Heathrow Airport migrated into the new
A
ut
ho
riz
21. Terminal 2, which allowed them to share many common ground
costs. Similar initiatives of alliance
members sharing locations and resources also led to savings and
improved passenger service in various
other international hubs.16
Passenger Benefits
The formation of Star Alliance provided customers with an
integrated worldwide airline network with
global recognition. By 2020, Star Alliance had maintained the
largest network, covering 195 countries (98
per cent of the world) and serving over 1,300 airports. In 2017,
Star Alliance’s CEO Jeffrey Goh was asked
if the constellation had reached its full size or if it had plans to
continue to expand, to which Goh replied,
“We will never say no, but we are pretty comprehensive in our
network today.”17 Focusing on customer
relations, the alliance aimed to enhance global travel, making it
more convenient and simple for its
customers, while meeting their needs in ways that individual
airlines could not.
Whenever possible, the member airlines tried to use gates in the
same terminal, with neighbouring gates
allowing for convenient transfers and passenger connections.
When delays occurred, the connections were
protected, monitored, and proactively re-accommodated on a
proactive basis. Most passengers were offered
“through check-in” service that led them through their final
destination. The simplicity and consistency of
quality in member services helped customers feel that they were
travelling with the same standard of service
22. throughout the entire trip.18
Loyalty Programs
Based on extensive marketing research, Star Alliance made
various changes to meet the expectations and
needs of its frequent international flyers. Customers could earn
mileage points whenever they travelled on
any Star Alliance member airline. The points would accumulate
and could be credited toward different
frequent flyer programs of Star Alliance carriers. This allowed
customers to use every point earned to reach
elite status within the various programs sooner, as well as to
redeem their reward miles throughout the
alliance network.19
Star Alliance also added two status tiers—silver and gold—in
the loyalty programs of member carriers to
recognize and reward loyal customers across the entire alliance.
Gold status allowed customers access to
the highest level of service at airports around the world and
priority treatment, from check-in to baggage
claim. Elite customers enjoyed a seamless travel experience and
tangible benefits. Upon presentation of
their card or status, customers were directed to the lounges of
Star Alliance carriers, which provided fine
cuisine, beverages, access to global news, Internet access, and
other business amenities. Gold status
customers also had clearance to more efficiently pass through
airport security in more than 130 airports
around the world.20
Star Alliance travellers enjoyed various other benefits,
including Internet tools for smart phones and tablets,
and the latest technology services. All airlines sold tickets and
23. tracked reservations, but Star Alliance’s website
featured online tools that allowed customers to plan their
travels at all times. The site was integrated with the
booking systems of member airlines and was linked to a main
computer reservation system. Corporate clients
were a key profitability factor for all major airlines and
especially those with long-haul routes. Star Alliance
offered various incentives specifically for corporate clients,
including discounts across the network of its
member carriers. It was also the first alliance to feature global
conventions and events services that allowed
delegates from all over the world to enjoy discounts across the
entire Star Alliance network.21
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
o
nl
y
by
x
us
27. a
c
op
yr
ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
Page 5 9B21M010
OTHER FORMS OF AIRLINE CO-OPERATION
Star Alliance, Oneworld, and SkyTeam provided a range of
benefits to both their member airlines and
passengers. However, the various other forms of co-operation
among airlines were also effective. For
example, interline and codeshare arrangements allowed airlines
to sell seats on connecting airlines and
sometimes share a flight’s code information. All members of an
alliance agreed to interline agreements,
which served passengers travelling with two or more airlines on
the same itinerary.22 Even airlines across
different alliances often shared interline agreements. Code
sharing allowed two partner airlines to list one
28. specific flight as their own and carry two different reservation
codes. Like interline agreements, code
sharing had been a common practice in the industry before
alliances became popular. For example, Star
Alliance member Air Canada was maintaining 25 codeshare
agreements in 2013, including one with Etihad
Airways, a non-aligned Middle Eastern airline.23
Star Alliance, and similar networks, occupied the space between
codeshare agreements and more substantial
forms of business co-operation, such as joint ventures and
mergers. Alliance members shared flight code,
airport lounges, loyalty programs, and an umbrella brand.
However, revenue and pricing sharing was
forbidden, unless specific members formed their own bilateral
joint venture agreement. Alliances were
therefore able to avoid many of the antitrust issues associated
with typical joint ventures and similar strict
forms of business co-operation.
A special type of joint venture for specific routes granted
airlines antitrust immunity. The partner airlines
essentially acted as one on these specific routes, coordinating
their pricing and schedules and even sharing their
revenues. By 2012, these special joint ventures were one of the
most common forms of co-operation in the airline
industry, accounting for 87 per cent of traffic carried across the
North Atlantic. Most of them were agreements
between large carriers, who were also part of a major global
alliance.24 In 2018, 60 per cent of American’s
international capacity was included in some form of joint
venture agreement. In the same year, joint venture
partnerships included 58 per cent of Delta’s and 46 per cent of
United’s international capacity.25
29. In 2018, Delta anticipated that it would earn $500–600 million
in incremental revenues by 2020, resulting
from its joint venture partnerships. Much of that revenue was
expected to be passed along to customers, but
despite the benefits that airlines claimed they were passing on
to passengers, governments were reluctant
to extend antitrust immunity through these joint venture
partnerships, except for routes that had no
significant impact on competition. Regardless, in 2015 the
United States Department of Justice conversely
found that joint venture partnerships often increased, rather than
lowered, ticket prices.26
The most involved form of business co-operation, short of a
complete merger, was an equity investment
agreement. Delta took this approach during the 2000s when it
acquired stakes in China Eastern Airlines
Corporation Limited, Air France-KLM S.A., Korean Air Co.
Ltd., Virgin Atlantic, and LATAM Airlines.
Delta invested a 49 per cent stake in Virgin Atlantic, which
proved to be its most successful outcome in
this type of strategy. Virgin Atlantic provided Delta greater
access to several transatlantic routes, while
Delta opened access to several popular US destinations
previously unavailable to Virgin Atlantic. This type
of strategy, however, could be risky for the investor, who was
also exposed to severe potential losses. In
early 2020, for example, Delta invested $1.9 billion for a 20 per
cent stake in LATAM; a few months later,
this investment was worth less than one-tenth of that amount, at
approximately $150 million, after the
airline filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 26, 2020.27
MANAGING STAR ALLIANCE
30. The combined management of Star Alliance was a challenge,
with a large number of global airlines that
included United and Lufthansa, two of the largest and most
powerful airlines in the world. United’s
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
o
nl
y
by
x
us
ha
n
li
in
B
U
34. v
io
la
tio
n.
Page 6 9B21M010
chairman, Gerard Greenwald, noted that Star Alliance was
“bound together only by four pages of
governance, with no formal ownership ties.”28 In fact, no
formal structure was created to manage the
alliance at the time of its creation.
This situation changed the following year, however, when a new
focused management team was charged
with implementing a five-year business plan to be approved by
Star Alliance’s member airlines. From then
on, strategic decisions would be directed by a core group of
executives chosen by the alliance’s member
airlines. The new management board reported to the chief
executive board, which dealt with issues of
strategic importance. Star Alliance also formed several
committees that were comprised of experts from
member carriers and from the alliance itself. In 2019, Star
Alliance became a corporation under German
law (i.e., a GmbH), with a limited staff and offices in Frankfurt
Airport, in Germany (see Exhibit 6).
35. Quality Control
Providing customers with a consistent quality of service,
regardless of which airline they travelled with,
was a key success factor for Star Alliance. The five founding
members therefore set rigorous standards that
were expected to be met by any new member. While members
did not maintain a completely homogeneous
product, Star did have a set of standards with regard to the
quality of basic amenities and services that were
met by all incoming member airlines.29
A new member typically had previous partnerships with each of
the other member carriers individually.
This precaution ensured that code sharing could be implemented
right away. No other requirements for
partnerships outside of the alliance were needed. However,
when airlines joined Star Alliance they often
abandoned their previous partnerships or integrated them into
the constellation.30
Brand Management31
In founding Star Alliance, the members created a brand name
that would become known internationally but
would not become a substitute for their existing brands.
Members did not lose the individual airlines’
differentiation by brands, identities, customs, and service
styles. The main advantage of the alliance
network was its ability to give passengers access to a single
global network that was as seamless as possible,
along with the established status and recognition of the member
airlines. Star Alliance managers used an
umbrella brand that allowed each airline to keep the original
logo, complemented by the Star Alliance logo,
36. on the plane’s forward fuselage and on ticket jackets,
promotional items, and signs.
By 2020, the three major alliance umbrella brands—Star
Alliance, Oneworld, and SkyTeam—served as a
signal for the level of service and the breadth of network that
customers could expect. However, the
individual performance of each member airline still mattered. If
a customer had a poor experience on a
flight, both the reputation of that airline and the reputation of
the alliance could be harmed.
Over the early years of Star’s existence, the absence of core
values, service styles, and products within the
alliance did not pose an issue for member performance.
Passengers seemed unconcerned about differences
in travel experience with separate airlines, perhaps because all
members were well respected airlines in
their own right. Since 2017, the alliance had developed a digital
transformation strategy aimed at delivering
a distinct and seamless travel experience.
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
41. another was the main challenge. After nearly two
decades of efforts and investments in new technology and
training, Star Alliance had built and was
maintaining an advanced technology infrastructure to support
the operations of its carriers and the seamless
transition of passengers between member carriers.
Star Alliance continued to spend resources and effort to help
members deliver consistent services across the
alliance. Similarly, Oneworld developed an intensive training
program for its members. At the heart of that
program was a set of core messages agreed to by the partners,
including “recognizing people as individuals and
respect for individuals, while celebrating the different cultures
and atmospheres between the airlines.”33
FUTURE OF AIRLINE CONSTELLATIONS
Industry Consolidation
Despite a complex web of regulations, the global airline
industry had steadily moved toward long-term
consolidation, as airline constellations continued to expand by
adding members to their networks. With
additional airlines joining existing alliances, the overlap in
route structures of member airlines kept
increasing. This factor was a key consideration for incumbent
members in their assessment of new
applicants for membership.
Entry and exit from an airline constellation depended on the
terms of the membership. For example, at Star
Alliance, an airline that wanted to enter the network had to
show that it could meet the alliance’s standards.
Existing members voted on accepting a new member, with
42. voting shares based on the size of each airline.
By 2020, Star Alliance had become a mature alliance
organization that had developed a stable membership base,
a standard set of rules, and efficient processes. The three major
alliances had reached a comparable level of
market share in the industry. Airline mergers and co-operation
had also reached a saturation point. Further
consolidation of airline organizations would likely face strong
opposition due to antitrust regulations.
Potential Changes in the Hub-and-Spoke Model
Since its inception, the main focus of Star Alliance had been to
optimize the hub-and-spoke network of the
airline industry, which it saw as a key benefit. However,
beginning in 2015, point-to-point flights seemed
to be increasingly popular, especially ultra long-haul flights
(LHF).34
With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the advantages
of LHFs became increasingly evident for
two reasons. First, unlike with the hub-and-spoke system, point-
to-point networks allowed airlines the
choice of flying only the most economically viable routes,
without health and safety concerns from
layovers. Second, by the late 2010s, new planes were being
developed for non-stop ultra LHFs.
However, despite these advantages, LHFs still had two major
limitations. First, due to the long-distance nature
of their routes, the profitability for airlines was even more
vulnerable to extreme fuel price fluctuations. Second,
fatigue posed a serious health threat to passengers, flight crews,
and pilots on these routes.35
47. la
tio
n.
Page 8 9B21M010
THE PANDEMIC
The greatest challenge for the airline industry, however, was the
COVID-19 pandemic. The crisis was
expected to reach a total loss of $84.3 billion for the industry in
2020, with passenger demand falling to 54
per cent globally (see Exhibit 7). During the early months of the
pandemic, from January to July 2020, over
7.5 million flights were cancelled. In April 2020, 64 per cent of
all planes around the world were grounded.36
The drop in demand and required social distancing in seat
assignment led to a decline in passenger load for
those flights that were not cancelled. In addition, new safety
and health compliance costs promised to have
a serious impact on the cost structure of all airlines.
Before the COVID-19 outbreak, the airline industry was
projected to continue on its course of consistent
growth. In most emerging markets and developed countries,
trips per capita were expected to increase
steadily from 2019 to 2038. Popular regional routes were also
expected to see strong passenger growth. The
highest rate of growth was expected between the Middle East
and the United States, with a projected
passenger traffic increase of 5.5 per cent annually from 2019 to
2038.37
48. In response to the new COVID-19 travel restrictions, airlines
designated new routes between certain
countries that were labelled “corridors.” Many national
governments also expanded investments in their
country’s airlines, or provided other forms of support such as
unemployment benefits. There was great
uncertainty about how the pandemic would evolve and how
businesses worldwide would respond. Travel
projections from organizations such as the International Air
Transport Association changed often with new
information related to the COVID-19 virus. In June 2020,
passenger levels were forecasted to not recover
to pre-pandemic levels until 2025, and the global fleet in
service might not recover until 2022.38 The crisis
affected all global airlines and had a major impact on the
world’s two main aircraft manufacturers, Boeing
Company and Airbus SE. Major airlines were expected to
significantly reduce their purchase of new aircraft
during the 2020–2025 period by as much as 6,000 fewer
products than had been projected—an annual
reduction in purchases of 66 per cent.39
Individual Airline Responses
The first major response by the world’s airlines was to lobby for
increased government support and funding.
By August 2020, governments around the world had provided
over $125 billion in financing for domestic
airlines, with an additional $30 billion expected in the coming
months. The US government, in particular, had
provided $58 billion through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act in March 2020, with an
additional $25 billion expected before the end of the year. Of
this aid, $25 billion was given in the form of
49. loans for general expenses and an additional $25 billion was
provided in the form of grants to cover payroll
expenses. These loans were extended with rather severe
conditions placed on executive pay and dividends.40
This aid was not extensive enough to prevent massive airline
layoffs after the support period was over, as
passenger demand continued to falter throughout 2020. The
three largest airlines in the United States—
each one a founding member of Star Alliance, Oneworld, or
SkyTeam—announced record layoffs as the
government’s financial support ran out. In the summer of 2020,
American Airlines Inc. released over 19,000
employees, representing almost 20 per cent of the company’s
workforce, and Delta planned to lay off almost
2,000 pilots. United announced that it expected to lay off up to
36,000 employees by October 2020.41
The airline industry was clearly retrenching, which presented a
major challenge for alliance members: could
they reduce capacity in a co-operative manner? Another
consideration was the uneven governmental
support for global airlines during the pandemic, with different
governments having different levels of
interest in their national airlines. Some national airlines were
expected to survive the crisis, others would
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
54. respective government. How would these trends affect the
management and membership of global
constellations such as Star Alliance?
Star Alliance’s Response
Alliances played a key role in the industry’s response to the
pandemic. For example, Star Alliance created
a travel information hub that provided health precautions and
general information about COVID-19 to all
passengers. The alliance also created a set of health and safety
procedures for its member airlines to follow
that included regulations for passenger use of face masks,
cleaning and disinfecting requirements, and
operating steps to follow if a passenger developed COVID-19
symptoms.42 These actions were intended to
increase the level of comfort of passengers. However, the
normal rate of air travel was not expected to
recover for several years after the eventual end of the pandemic.
Before the outbreak of the pandemic, Star Alliance had been
facing various questions about its future.43 For
example, the constellation had to determine whether it should
continue to grow by introducing new services
to extend offerings to its loyal passengers, or maybe allow
individual airlines to operate more freely as
separate entities under the umbrella brand. Within its network,
the alliance had to determine if joint venture
partnerships should continue to grow or if the benefits were no
longer relevant.
However, all questions about structure and strategy had been set
aside as the world faced its worst health crisis
in over a century. The main question for Star Alliance now
became one of survival. What could the alliance
55. do to help its members weather the COVID-19 crisis? It clearly
did not have the funds to provide support, like
governments could. But it could help rebuild the trust of
customers and promote safe travel arrangements.
Beyond that level of assistance, what would Star Alliance’s role
be at the end of the pandemic?
Benjamin Gomes-Casseres is the Peter A. Petri Professor of
Business and Society at Brandeis University.
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
o
nl
y
by
x
us
ha
n
101. pe
ci
al
-e
di
tio
n/
13
06
92
.a
rt
ic
le
.
Authorized for use only by xushan li in BUAD 301 – Spring
2022 Coursepack at California State University - Fullerton from
1/22/2022 to 5/21/2022.
Use outside these parameters is a copyright violation.
P
ag
e
111. -a
irl
in
e-
al
lia
nc
es
/1
23
97
9.
ar
tic
le
.
Authorized for use only by xushan li in BUAD 301 – Spring
2022 Coursepack at California State University - Fullerton from
1/22/2022 to 5/21/2022.
Use outside these parameters is a copyright violation.
Page 12 9B21M010
EXHIBIT 3: SAMPLE OF CONNECTIONS MADE FOR
FLIGHTS BETWEEN FRANKFURT, GERMANY
112. AND NEW YORK, UNITED STATES
Airline for Cross-Atlantic
Leg—Frankfurt to
New York
Connecting
Flights by
Leg Type
Number of
Passengers
(in 000s)
Number
of Flights
Number of Unique
Final Destination
Airports
Number of
Connecting
Airlines
Delta Air Lines Inc.
Note: Behind = domestic flight into a hub (e.g., Warsaw to
Frankfurt on the way to New York); Beyond = domestic flight
out of
113. a hub (e.g., New York to Cincinnati, after originating in
Frankfurt); Bridge = flight that starts behind a hub and
continues beyond
the connecting hub (e.g., Warsaw to Frankfurt, to New York,
and then to Cincinnati).
Source: Prepared by case authors with information from the
Sabre Market Intelligence database of SABRE GLBL Inc.,
searching with the Origin and Destinations function for final
data on routing shown on tickets for flights from Jan 1, 2019 to
Dec 31, 2019 between JFK and CDG, GRA, and LHR. Tables
shows tickets sold by Delta Air Lines Inc., Deutsche
Lufthansa AG and Singapore Airlines, accessed on July 14,
2020.
EXHIBIT 4: FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES BY
ALLIANCE AFFILIATION, 2008–2018
Results Aggregated by
Membership in Alliance
Groupings
2008 2018 Change over
the period
2008-2018
Change for 2008-2018
including only members
present for the full period
2018
Market
115. Bridge 913 251 65 9
Deutsche Lufthansa AG
Behind 169,820 839 1 6
Beyond 1,3260 264 136 25
Bridge 3,941 1,407 182 32
Singapore Airlines
Behind 35,201 322 1 2
Beyond 4,715 170 91 12
Bridge 5,298 849 113 22
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
o
nl
y
by
x
us
ha
n
119. op
yr
ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
Page 13 9B21M010
EXHIBIT 5: TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES BY
ALLIANCE AFFILIATION, 2008–2018
Results Aggregated by
Membership in Alliance
Groupings
2008 2018 Change over
the Period
2008–2018
Change for 2008–2018
Including Only Members
120. Present for the Full Period
2018
Market
Share
RPK
Star 974,991 1,792,884 84% 58% 25%
Oneworld 704,956 1,184,244 68% 32% 17%
SkyTeam 928,210 1,470,212 58% 22% 21%
Non-Aligned 1,483,701 2,707,064 82% - 38%
ASK
Star 1,267,902 2,215,516 75% 49% 26%
Oneworld 913,177 1,484,113 63% 24% 17%
SkyTeam 1,180,172 1,677,225 42% 14% 19%
Non-Aligned 1,932,450 3,232,377 67% — 38%
Load Factor
Star 74.7% 79.7% 7% 7% —
Oneworld 76.7% 80.2% 5% 8% —
SkyTeam 75.9% 80.5% 6% 8% —
Non-Aligned 76.6% 83.9% 10% — —
Passengers (in 000)
Star 442 798 81% 49% 23%
Oneworld 287 449 56% 42% 13%
SkyTeam 439 588 34% 15% 17%
Non-Aligned 849 1,575 86% — 46%
Note: RPK = revenue passenger kilometres; ASK = available
seat kilometres
Source: “Free Download: Airline Business 2018–2019 Digital
Special Edition,” FlightGlobal, accessed December 14, 2020,
www.flightglobal.com/strategy/free-download-airline-business-
121. 2018-2019-digital-special-edition/130692.article.
EXHIBIT 6: STAR ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP AND
STRUCTURE, 2019
Membership
x New members are accepted into the alliance by a vote of the
chief executive board.
x In addition to an entry fee based on size, new members are
required to complete the integration process
by fulfilling membership standards.
x A member may withdraw voluntarily from the alliance, but
membership may be terminated in certain
events such as bankruptcy or loss of operating licence. An exit
fee may apply.
x Each member must comply with the standards of membership
and is subject to annual audits for
compliance.
Structure
x The two governing boards are the chief executive board and
the alliance management board.
x The boards are supported by various committees and expert
groups.
x The alliance is managed by a management team.
Source: From author’s personal conversation with Star Alliance
staff. Reproduced with company permission.
128. Passengers
Source: Prepared by the case authors with information from
IATA [International Air Transport Association], Air Passenger
Market Analysis: Domestic Air Travel Continues to Drive the
Recovery in June, June 2020, accessed December 14, 2020,
www.iata.org/en/iata-repository/publications/economic-
reports/air-passenger-monthly-analysis---june-20202.
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
o
nl
y
by
x
us
ha
n
132. op
yr
ig
ht
v
io
la
tio
n.
Page 15 9B21M010
ENDNOTES
1 This case study has been written on the basis of published
sources only. Consequently, the interpretation and perspectives
presented in this case are not necessarily those of Star Alliance
or any of its employees. This case study revises the 2000
Brandeis University case by Sarah Marchand, Star Alliance,
2000, Brandeis University: International Business School,
February 23, 2004, accessed December 14, 2020,
https://alliancestrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/BGC-Star-
IBSCase04.pdf. The separate publication, Note on the Global
Airline Industry in 2020, is intended to be taught in conjunction
with this case study and serves as additional background.
2 “About Star Alliance: Star Alliance Leads the Way,” Star
Alliance, accessed November 15, 2020,
www.staralliance.com/en/about.
3 “Deregulation: A Watershed Event,” Smithsonian National Air
133. and Space Museum, accessed November 15, 2020,
https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/america-by-
air/online/jetage/jetage08.cfm.
4 A relevant definition and discussion of constellation as a form
of multi-organizational networks is featured in Benjamin
Gomes-Casseres, Remix Strategy: The Three Laws of Business
Combination (Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press,
2015), 89–93.
5 Chris McGinnis. “A Guide to Global Airline Alliances,” BBC
Travel, accessed November 16, 2020,
www.bbc.com/travel/story/20111130-a-guide-to-global-airline-
alliances.
6 Bruce McDonald “Antitrust for Airlines,” The United States
Department of Justice, July 3, 2005, transcript of remarks,
accessed December 14, 2020,
www.justice.gov/atr/speech/antitrust-airlines.
7 Graham Dunn and Linda Moore, “Alliances, Codeshares and
Beyond,” Airlines Business 32, no. 7 (2016).
8 McGinnis, op. cit.
9 Graham Dunn, “ANALYSIS: The 20-Year History of Global
Airline Alliances,” FlightGlobal, May 15, 2017, accessed
December 14, 2020, www.flightglobal.com/analysis/analysis-
the-20-year-history-of-global-airline-alliances/123979.article.
10 Mihiro Sasaki, Atsuo Suzuki, and Zvi Drezner, “On the
Selection of Hub Airports for an Airline Hub-and-Spoke
System,”
Computers and Operations Research 26, no. 14 (1999): 1411–
1422.
11 “About Connecting Partners,” Star Alliance, accessed
November 14, 2020, www.staralliance.com/en/cp-overview.
12 All currency amounts are in US$ unless otherwise specified.
13 “About Star Alliance,” op. cit.
14 FlightGlobal, “Airline Alliance Survey,” Airline Business,
June, 1999.
15 Chris Jasper, “Rising Star,” FlightGlobal, May 18, 1999,
accessed November 16, 2020, www.flightglobal.com/rising-
134. star/26260.article.
16 “We Move under One Roof, so You Move Less,” Star
Alliance, accessed November 15, 2020,
www.staralliance.com/en/connectingyou.
17 Dunn, op. cit.
18 “Star Alliance Connection Service,” Star Alliance, 2020,
accessed November 15, 2020.
www.staralliance.com/en/connection-service
19 “Frequent Flyers,” Star Alliance, accessed November 16,
2020, www.staralliance.com/en/frequent-flyers.
20 Ibid.
21 Ibid.
22 Ben Schlappig, “Interline Agreements Vs. Codeshare
Agreements Vs. Alliances Vs. Joint Ventures,” One Mile at a
Time,
October 12, 2017, accessed December 14, 2020,
https://onemileatatime.com/interline-codeshare-alliances-joint-
ventures.
23 Max Kingsley-Jones, “ANALYSIS: Why Etihad's James
Hogan Is Empire Building,” October 21, 2013, accessed
December
14, 2020, www.flightglobal.com/analysis-why-etihads-james-
hogan-is-empire-building/111357.article.
24 FlightGlobal, “Airline Alliance Survey”, Airline Business,
2012.
25 FlightGlobal, “Airline Alliance Survey”, Airline Business,
2018.
26 William Gillespie and Oliver M. Richard, Antitrust Immunity
and International Airline Alliances, The United States
Department
of Justice, economic analysis group discussion paper, February
1, 2011, accessed December 14, 2020,
www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-immunity-and-international-
airline-alliances.
27 Ben Schlappig, “Is Delta Air Lines’ Global Strategy
Backfiring?” One Mile at a Time, April 2, 2020, accessed
135. December 14,
2020, https://onemileatatime.com/delta-air-lines-global-
strategy-backfiring.
28 Chris Jasper, “Rising Star,” May 18, 1999, accessed
December 14, 2020, www.flightglobal.com/rising-
star/26260.article?adredir=1.
29 “About Star Alliance: Star Alliance Leads The Way”, Star
Alliance, 2020, accessed December 21, 2020,
www.staralliance.com/en/about.
30 Simon Mills, “Airline Alliance Survey”, Airline Business,
September, 2011, 1-42.
31 “Products & Services. Creating the Star Alliance Travel
Experience,” Star Alliance, 2020, accessed December 21, 2020,
https://portal.staralliance.com/stardesk/publications/P_S_Broch
ure.pdf.
32 “Star Alliance and NEC Corporation Sign Partnership
Agreement to Enhance Passenger Experience through Biometric
Data
Recognition Technology,” NEC Corporation, 2019, accessed
December 22, 2020,
www.nec.com/en/press/201907/global_20190726_01.html.
33 FlightGlobal, “Airline Alliance Survey,” Airline Business,
January 1999.
34 “The Rise of the Ultra-Long-Haul Flight,” The Economist,
March 27, 2018, accessed November 16, 2020,
www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/03/27/the-rise-of-the-
ultra-long-haul-flight.
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
140. 35 Bloch Bauer and Rico Merkert, “Ultra Long-Haul: An
Emerging Business Model Accelerated by COVID-19,” Journal
of Air
Transport Management 89 (2020): 1–8.
36 “Industry Losses to Top $84 Billion in 2020,” IATA
[International Air Transport Association], June 9, 2020,
accessed
December 14, 2020, www.iata.org/en/pressroom/pr/2020-06-09-
01/.
37 “Global Market Forecast 2019–2038,” Airbus, accessed
December 14, 2020, www.airbus.com/aircraft/market/global -
market-forecast.html.
38 Matt Driskill, “Updated: IATA Says 2020 Losses Will Be
Biggest in Aviation History as COVID-19 Lays Waste to
Travel,”
Asian Aviation, June 9, 2020, accessed December 14, 2020,
https://asianaviation.com/iata-says-2020-losses-will-be-biggest-
in-aviation-history.
39 “Industry Losses to Top $84 Billion in 2020,” IATA
[International Air Transport Association], press release, June 9,
2020,
accessed November 14, 2020,
www.iata.org/en/pressroom/pr/2020-06-09-01.
40 Eduardo Mariz, “Covid-19 Bailouts: Seven Carriers Get
$2.8bn in New and Additional Aid,” Ishka, August 20, 2020,
accessed
December 14, 2020,
www.ishkaglobal.com/News/Article/6264/Covid-19-bailouts-
Seven-carriers-get-2-8bn-in-new-and-
additional-aid.
41 Jack Kelly, “Two Major Airlines Have Announced Massive
Layoffs,” Forbes, August 26, 2020, accessed December 14,
2020,
www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/08/26/two-major-airlines-
have-announced-massive-layoffs/?sh=3e94a48b235f.
141. 42 “26 Member Airlines. All Committed to Keeping You Safe,”
Star Alliance, accessed December 14, 2020,
www.staralliance.com/en/commitments.
43 Antonio Tugores-Garcia, Analysis of Global Airline
Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, thesis paper, May 14,
2012, accessed December 14, 2020,
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/10127599.pdf.
A
ut
ho
riz
ed
fo
r u
se
o
nl
y
by
x
us
ha
n
li
in
146. The purpose of MOB is to empower Black men and provide
them with a counter
space and sense of community that will allow students to utilize
each other as systems of
support to aid in on their success. The core values of MOB are
unity, Black culture,
culturally validating identity development and K-12 outreach in
urban, hood’
communities. Rooted in these core values, MOB objective is to
develop students into
scholars/leaders. Furthermore, to establish a sense of belonging
for urban Black youth
rooted in mentorship, culture and identity.
At the college level, California State University, East Bay
(CSUEB) being the
first college partnership via student club on campus; MOB is a
cohort of 12 Black men
students at CSUEB. It is a community of individuals that
support, validate, challenge and
grow together. Components are regular intragroup dialogue
sessions on Black identity
through forms of Hip Hop cultural expression, historical and
contemporary racism
147. including internalized racism and contemporary issues in the
community at the collegiate
level. Furthermore, components include graduate/professional
school workshops,
financial literacy, leadership development, study sessions and
“talk shit” sessions of
which students have the space to talk more loosely on
contemporary cultural trends that
they see in the community that impact them on and off campus.
These sessions on
campus have been critical in engaging Black men and women
and establishing a sense of
belonging for them at the college campus, transpiring to their
work and engagement with
their K-12 youth.
In accomplishing this goal, MOB partners with Castlemont Hi gh
School in East
Oakland, West Oakland Middle School in West Oakland, and
McClymonds High School
148. 2
in West Oakland in developing a higher education access
pipeline of which College
MOB student mentors work with K-12 student mentees. At
Castlemont High School and
McClymonds High School in particular, MOB conducts college
readiness programming
via weekly A-G requirement meetings, one on one and group
academic check ins, after
school tutoring and personal check ins with students that focus
on student core values and
identity development. In addition, MOB K-12 mentor program
149. consists of leadership and
research work via weekly Youth Participatory Action Research
(YPAR) and community
engagement.
As part of this, K-12 MOB youth partake in community-based
research projects
where students analyze the existing issues and strengths that
they see in their surrounding
Oakland community to impact practice based on how they
construct knowledge. Most
critically, MOB mentors develop close connections with K-12
mentees and their families
to support students along their experiences in school, and their
life experiences outside of
school to impact the holistic development of the student. These
grassroots, community-
oriented approaches to our MOB work sets foundation for my
passion to write this
dissertation. Furthermore, this dissertation is grounded in the
experiences of myself,
student participants, and the larger Black community that we
are members of.
150. 3
Introduction
This is not your average dissertation. This dissertation is guided
and grounded in
solidarity with its population of study. It is a dissertation that is
not concerned with
receiving legitimization from those that may or may not confer
it. It is a dissertation
that’s principal concern is interrupting processes of power that
have created Black deficit
frameworks that are described, investigated and contested
within pages of this
dissertation. Most critically, this is a dissertation that
privileges the San Francisco State
University Educational Leadership Doctoral Program’s mission
of social justice and
151. equity over the sole purpose of simply obtaining a doctorate
degree. The work of MOB is
not just “the work.” It is my life and commitment to justice via
fighting for the
humanization of hood ‘Black males and working to create and
sustain life-thriving
realities for the Black community overall. MOB, the sample of
12 students featured in
this study, is a small mirror of practice that we hope can inform
the larger Black masses
and society.
Eurocentrism, Knowledge Production and The Myth of
Objectivity
This work is rooted in the critical Ethnic Studies tradition. As
such, it questions
the underlying and foundational assumption that knowledge is
produced independent of
geopolitical contexts. Critical Ethnic studies scholars call for a
recognition and critique of
Eurocentrism. For these scholars, the historical processes of
colonialism affirmed Europe
and its forms of knowledge as the center of the world while
simultaneously
152. ‘subalternizing’ the forms of knowledge found in its periphery
(Dussel 1995, Grosfoguel
2007, Maldanodo-Torres 2008, Brown and Barganier, 2018). For
these scholars, the
social sciences are founded on the Eurocentric myth that
knowledge can be produced
4
objectively. Instead, Ethnic Studies scholars argue for an
acknowledgement of the social,
political context of the researcher and for a critique from the
perspective of the oppressed
(Tuhiwai-Smith 1999). This dissertation is guided by these
principles. By acknowledging
153. the relationship of the production of knowledge to relations of
power, I decenter
traditional methods of research and engage the research subjects
as active participants in
the construction of knowledge. In other words, I have sought to
utilize a method and
theoretical framing that allows students to participate in
meaning making. In this sense,
this dissertation is a collaborative effort between myself and
other MOB members.
Given that this work follows this tradition, my dissertation
differs from traditional
works in several key ways: (1). Conceptually: I take a
fundamentally different approach
to concepts such as “success.” Traditionally, success is defined
in educational research as
educational performance or achievement gap aspirations such as
supporting the social
and emotional development of Black boys to succeed
academically (Harper, 2016).
Instead, I understand success by means of students gaining a
sense of pride and
confidence to resist and interrupt forms of coloniality (which
may show up differently
154. from student to student). We view success this way given that
this definition of success is
rooted in a Black community-cultural framework of resistance
that places the historical
and contemporary struggle of Black oppression against White
colonialism at the forefront
of our meaning making systems for success. In connection, we
understand that Black
male deficit experiences within the school system is just a
function of the larger
society/system that is anti-Black. As such, on an individual
level, a student saying that
they felt more encouraged to speak up/assert themselves more in
their classes or in life in
general based on confidence built through their MOB
experiences is an example of
155. 5
success when centering MOB outcomes through our historical
rebellion lens against
racial oppression.
(2). Methodologically: In order to meet these stated ends, we
utilized a Black
Emancipatory Action Research Approach (BEAR) to allow both
myself and students to
make meaning of their interviews and data in a Black cultural
way experienced by people
of African descent (Akom, 2011). (3). In other words, I have
attempted to construct a
methodology that privileges the knowledge production of my
participants. Theoretically:
Even further, my work is concerned with highlighting the
people’s knowledge which is
the consciousness of Black students in alignment with the urban
Black communities that
they come from. To this end, I have sought to construct a
theoretical framework that
156. moves beyond those which tend to pathologize many of these
groups. Therefore, Tupac
Shakur serves as a theoretician that can illuminate the
experiences of my subjects with
more clarity than traditional education research. (4).
Analytically: My data analysis is
grounded in the experience of my research participants and how
the participants and I
constructed meaning making of data together in connection to
how we analyzed certain
Tupac Shakur lyrics in connection to the data.
(5). Accessibility: This work is intended to serve as a lens that
is for the
community and by the community. There are existing
frameworks in academia that
appeal to the consciousness of non-Black educators that are
looking for “manuals” and
“guides” on how to work with urban Black youth; for example,
“For White Folks That
Teach in The Hood”-Christopher Emdin, who is a brilliant
scholar that you will see in my
literature review section of this dissertation. This work, in
contrast, is for Blacks of the
157. 6
community overall to tap into their very own community
cultural power to liberate
themselves.
Groundings with My Brothers: A Long Tradition of Radical
Resistance
Revolutionary historian Walter Rodney conveyed the meaning
of Black power
through his scholarly work “The Groundings with My
158. Brothers.” The Groundings with
My brothers is a call for unity amongst the downtrodden
members of the Black diaspora
(from Black America to the Black Caribbean etc) to build unity
amongst each other based
on our shared racialized experiences. In connection with The
Groundings with My
Brothers, Rodney expressed that Black Power is a doctrine
about Black people, for Black
people, preached by Black people (Rodney, 1969). The concept
of “grounding” refers to
a collective process and space where Black people could
critically engage with each
other. In these meetings, Black people determined the confines
of the dialogue and came
to a political consensus on how to best address their issues.
Reflecting on these meetings,
Rodney argued, Black people needed,
to 'ground together.' There was all this furor about whites being
present in the
Black Writers Congress which most whites did not understand.
They did not
understand that our historical experience has been speaking to
white people,
159. whether it be begging white people, justifying ourselves against
white people or
even vilifying white people. Our whole context has been, 'that is
the man to talk
to.' Now the new understanding is that Black Brothers must talk
to each
other. That is a very simple understanding which any reasonable
person outside
of a particular 'in-group' would understand. That is why we talk
about our family
discussions.
160. 7
Rodney’s work here is useful in three central ways: First,
Rodney acknowledges
the entanglement of knowledge production and politics and
grounds his scholarship
within his larger political project-Black Power. Secondly,
Rodney turns the Eurocentric
myth of objectivity on its head by privileging subaltern
knowledge. That is to say,
Rodney demonstrates that while dominate forms of knowledge
tend to disguise social
reality, the knowledge created by the masses illuminates the
true nature of social
relations. For Rodney, “the groundings” were the worldviews of
the oppressed and their
collective critiques and analyses of relations of power. Lastly,
and perhaps even more
important, these analyses are rooted in the experiences of the
masses. The groundings
were a collective process. This is a major departure from
traditional academic research
161. that views the people as objects to be studied, rather than actual
moral subjects.
These themes are key to the theoretical framing, methodology,
and data analysis
of this work. This work specifies the importance of making
meaning of data, lived
experience, and construction of knowledge grounded through a
Black power lens given
that our Blackness (in a White world) has the biggest impact on
our lives. In connecting
Groundings with My Brothers to this dissertation, I used Tupac
Shakur as an analytical
tool given that Tupac best conveys the struggle and Black
empowerment in ways that
best resonate with the low-income, hood’ Black young men
featured in this study. Tupac
Shakur’s construct of Thug Life serves as a contemporary form
of people’s knowledge,
along a radical tradition of Black power. Thus, in tradition of
Walter Rodney, Tupac both
resonates with the ethos of MOB and stands as an exceptionally
useful lens to analyze
how MOB students navigate their experiences with alienation.
162. 8
The Significance of Tupac Shakur
Tupac Shakur had a triple consciousness of love, street
survival/thugism, and a
revolutionary identity of resistance grounded in the duality of
his pre-birth and post birth
experiences along the struggles of the oppressed Black masses.
To unpack this a little
more, we should start with examining his pre-birth experience
of being in the belly of his
163. pregnant Black Panther Party mother, Afeni Shakur, while she
was in a New York Prison
fighting a conspiracy case against the United States
government. Tupac being born one
month after Afeni Shakur was acquitted of those charges in
1971, was born into an
indigenous, revolutionary world culture of resistance grounded
in the practices of the
Black Panther Party (Shakur, 2019). Like Afeni, Tupac’s
Godfather Jeronimo Pratt and
Stepfather Mutulu Shakur were very important figures in the
Black Liberation
Movement. Moreover, Tupac was named after “Tupac Amaru
II,” an 18th century Inca
Peruvian revolutionary who lead an Indigenous uprising against
European/Spanish rule.
When connecting the circumstances surrounding Tupac’s name
and being born into a
Black Panther Party family, one could see the shaping of Tupac
Shakur as a freedom
fighter for justice.
Revolutionary practices of the Black Panther Party fueled the
consciousness of
164. the Black masses in predominate inner-city communities of the
1960s and 70s (Shakur,
2019). As Tupac was born in, and in alignment with the inner-
city Black masses, his
post-birth experiences continued to reflect the radical resistance
teachings of his Black
Panther/Liberation Army family. This was also intertwined with
the collective struggles
of the inner-city Black community of the 1970s-90s of which
Tupac grew up in. In
connection, the urban Black community was not just a place of
radical resistance, but it
165. 9
was also a place of high poverty rates, drug dealing, drug abuse,
prostitution, gangs and
violence due to systematic racism. Through Tupac’s experience
growing up in East
Harlem/New York, Baltimore, and his relocation to Marin City
Jungles/Oakland and then
LA; his influences were Black revolutionaries, street thugs,
gangsters, pimps, drug
dealers, prostitutes, dope fiends and hustlers collectively as
these people were part of his
day to day reality as a Black man in the urban ghettos that he
grew up in. Also, his
mother Afeni who at one point was on drugs (crack cocaine)
during aspects of Tupac’s
upbringing, remained a symbol of strength and love for Tupac
that he would also
embrace within his consciousness and music.
As you can see, much of the framing that I am discussing here
are experiences of
166. Tupac prior to him being the artist that we would come to know
today as a legend. These
experiences of love, thugism/street life, and political revolution
are grounded in Tupac.
Most important, these experiences help us understand the
duality of Tupac’s lifestyle and
work that impacts generations of Black youth that also witness a
duality of experiences in
their inner-city Black struggle. Tupac has many rap songs that
focus on revolution solely,
love solely, and street life/thugism solely. He also has music
that blends all these themes
together. The below Tupac lyrics are an example of the duality
within Tupac’s work.
“Born thuggin and lovin the way I came up
Big money clutchin', bustin" while evadin' cocaine busts
My pulse rushin, send my pulse into insanity
they shot at my cousin now we bustin' at they whole' family
The coppers want to see me buried, I ain't worried
I got a line on the D.A. 'cause I'm fuckin his secretary
167. 10
I black out and start cussin, bust 'em and touch 'em all
They panic and bitches duckin, I rush 'em and fuck 'em all
I'll probably be an old man before I understand
Why I had to live my life with pistols close at hand
they kidnapped my homey's sister, cut her face up bad
They even raped her, so we blazed they pad
Automatic shots rang out, on every block
They puttin hits out on politicians, even cops” (Shakur, 2001).
168. In these lyrics, you can see Tupac’s expression of love and
concern for the cousin
and sister that was brutalized, a sense of street life/violence via
“bustin while evading
cocaine busts,” and revolution in the form of “putting hits out
on politicians, even cops.”
This duality found in his lyrics is the reason Tupac is so
relatable to the Black masses as
these experiences represent a duality found in the oppressed
Black Mass communities. In
this case, Tupac is not important despite of his contradictions
and duality. Rather, Tupac
is important because of his contradictions and duality.
Tupac was the center of much controversy throughout his legacy
and his
messages of Black unity, solidarity, love, street life/thugism
and revolution were
prevalent through the many brush ins with the law that he
encountered. Furthermore, the
context surrounding Tupac’s death. Tupac’s many issues were
connected to his fight for
liberation. Understanding the meaning of Blackness in a White
world, is to understand
169. oppressive forces targeting anything that is Black and powerful.
To speak to this: The
White controlled media in the U.S. painted Tupac’s image in a
light that is different than
that of the people. Centering Tupac’s legacy and impact through
the people’s knowledge,
11
is to pay closer attention to how the Black masses in the
community are impacted by
170. Tupac Shakur opposed to how the media portrays him. WTupac
Shakur continues to have
an impact on a young generation of Black youth along their
racialized experiences as a
source of empowerment.
Positionality as Founding Director of MOB
To have a deep and correct understanding of what Thug Life
means, it is
important to understand how Tupac Shakur (the person that
diagnosed the Thug Life
Framework) made meaning of his very own concept which is
connected to Tupac’s life
experiences. This collective understanding is important to
building empathy amongst the
larger community that strives to be empowered by the said
frameworks which insures
successful implementation of the practice. If a generation
misunderstands and
misappropriates a culture of practice, the next generation can
always get it right by going
back to the direct source to examine what the original goals and
intentions of the culture
of practice was set for.
171. For example, there are some inner-city Black youth that steal
from, and kill other
Blacks for the purpose of personal and street disputes between
each other. Some of these
individuals think they are real thugs and claim to “live a thug
life.” Yet, this is an
example of when a generation has the idea and cultural practice
of Thug Life all wrong.
In understanding the true meaning of Thug Life via the
framework and practice that was
documented by Tupac Shakur: One would understand that Thug
Life would be the
process of those inner-city Black youth organizing
systematically to spark revolution
against colonial powers, instead of harming one another.
172. 12
In connection to MOB, I want to be sure to lay a narrative for
the audience to
understand my lived experiences that set foundation for my
construction and creation of
the My Other Brother (MOB) program. This is for the goal of
future generations to come,
to at least understand what I was/am trying to accomplish with
this work. This study is
the first attempt to see if MOB study participants make meaning
of their experiences in
the program in the way that the author had hoped to impact.
Through a letter that I wrote
to Tupac Shakur to center the Statement of Problem, I take you
on a narrative of
experiences of oppression that I have encountered and witnessed
within my community
and higher education experiences that sparked the creation of
the MOB program. Most
173. important, this experience reflects how I was able to overcome
through a narrative of
Thug Life that set the foundation for my MOB work.
Statement of Problem: Letter Narrative to Tupac Shakur
Black males in America are being systematically oppressed with
respect to health,
education, employment, income, and overall well-being. The
most reliable data
consistently indicate that Black males constitute a segment of
the population that is
distinguished by hardships, disadvantages, and vulnerability
(Noguera, 2008). This
especially connects to how Black males are treated in schools.
Black people represent
five percent of California’s K-12 student population, yet
account for 18% of all the
state’s K-12 suspensions (Harris III & Wood, 2013). Moreover,
Black males still have the
highest suspension rate, are at the bottom of academic
achievement, and are
disproportionately to this day, still pushed out of school at
alarming rates (Duncan, 2002;
Duncan-Andrade & Morrell, 2008; Noguera, 2003, 2012). To be
174. clear, the problem is
anti-Black racism and structural racialization and how it
impacts young Black males in
13
and outside of educational experiences. MOB aims to reverse
this trend by improving
educational and cultural content knowledge while fostering
Black male student agency to
resist oppression. In alignment with community strengths,
175. Tupac’s life work highlights
resistance, agency, and political contestation against structural
racialization.
Dear Tupac Amaru Shakur,
I have always been inspired by your bravery that you have
displayed in your life.
It has been your legacy, spirit, and strength that keep me
pushing forward throughout my
struggles and accomplishments as a hood Black man in this
“White man’s World.” In this
world, I have shifting moments of happiness in my life, similar
to a roller coaster ride
riddled with highs and lows. I am happy when I am building
with my Brothas in the
MOB, engaging students in my role as a College Instructor, and
interacting with peers at
work, school or in the hood in West Oakland. These experiences
are typically when I
smile. Outside of these experiences, I carry a burden of str ess,
yet pride and good energy
along this game of life that I am living. I try my best to keep
good energy, although I
must admit that sometimes my economic and racialized
experiences keep a stern look on
176. my face even though I yearn to smile. Below are some of my
personal experiences
growing up in my community that provides a foundation for the
strengths that are part of
my community that have helped me be successful. These
experiences provided me with
validation of who I am as a Black man and a source of capital
that helped me navigate
through the k-12 system that was set up for me to fail in the
first place. I want to thank
you Pac because Thug Life came to be something that I
understand and resonated with as
a youth. I never knew who Paulo Freire and “Pedagogy of the
oppressed” was. But I, the
Black masses overall from the hood, knew who Tupac and Thug
life was/is.
177. 14
In terms of my background in connection to Thug Life, I grew
up in the Real
West Oakland (not the gentrified West Oakland) with a culture
of being tough, real, and
unified with a sense of community. Sometimes we took that
toughness out on each other
(which is not a good thing), but the overarching, unconscious
understanding was that
being a Black man meant that you had to be family oriented and
tough-at least within the
inner-city hood Black struggle. During this time, the message
was that you are a Black
man in this world and the system is against you. “You don’t
need to be fighting one
178. another, you are brothers”---this was the first unifying message
that I understood for what
being a Black man represented in 1999 when I got into a fight
with one of my best friends
in elementary school. This was after myself and my patna (the
other man behind me in
the elementary school picture below) got into a fist fight in the
streets. When we came
home and Uncle Greg, my patnas father, found out; he explained
that we should not be
fighting with one another because we are family and shoul d
have each other’s back.
Uncle Greg said that “yall are brothers.” I now understand that
these implications of
Blackness in my childhood were embedded in your Thug Life
framework from the streets
Tupac. I did not understand the Black Panther party connection
to thug Life just yet
during this time. However, the foundation of “family,”
“toughness,” and “community”
via Thug Life was understood by me as a young West Oakland
kid in the hood.
I remember the police kicking Uncle Greg’s door in, in West
Oakland. Myself,
179. my best friend that I got into a fight with and the rest of the
family were in the house
when this happened. The police shot and killed our dog and
vandalized the entire house
and pointed guns at all of us. They were looking for Uncle Greg
and looking for drugs in
the house. Uncle Greg was not there during this time though.
We were all about 9 and 10
15
years old when we saw this. I knew from this experience and
180. many other encounters with
the police, including witnessing my mom deal with the police
and the police putting my
mom in hand cuffs (taking her from our home and to jail right
before my own eyes), that
the police were not in my community to help us. I felt that they
were the “bad guys”
against us. In contrast, I always felt affirmed when I was
running around in the streets of
West Oakland with my friends, my “family” from the
hood/community. I unconsciously
grew to look to my own community as a sense of “protecting
and serving ourselves,” as
the police appeared to be in my hood community to bring pain
and terror against us. This
is critical Pac because your Thug Life framework was also
birthed out of the inner-city
hood Black struggle, with police brutality and rebellion against
this type of oppression
being a critical focus of Thug Life.
As a result of Black oppression from racist law enforcement as
well as Black on
Black crime, being tough/strong and also having a sense of
family with your people in the
181. hood and standing up for yourself is what street Black culture
represented during this
time to me. This street Black culture, I would grow up to
recognize this as Thug Life.
While this type of community education and knowledge was in
alignment with our
racialized lived experiences as Black males of the hood
(extending outside of the
classroom), this Thug Life identity was threatening to White
colonial systems. In school,
many students that got suspended and kicked out of schools
were of this perceived
mentality/identity. Students were perceived as “thuggish,”
“aggressive or disruptive” in
the classroom as many teachers perceived us based on how we
chose to express ourselves
and our values/behaviors within the class. Pac I know that you
talked about these types of
issues in “Words of Wisdom.”
182. 16
“In one way or another America will find a way to eliminate the
problem, one by one.
The problem is the troublesome Black youth of the ghettos
And, one by one, we are being wiped off the face of this Earth
At an extremely alarming rate” (Shakur, 1991).
Our expressions as young Black males in school were connected
to our racialized
experiences outside of school in our communities and larger
society dealing with racial
oppressions. Especially racist encounters with White police in
our community, poverty,
family drug abuse and drug selling for survival, prostitution and
sexual violence against
Black women, and Black on Black turf/neighborhood and
personal violence against one
183. another. This was aspects of our reality outside of school. These
were the deficits of
Black males and the community overall. As a result, a sense of
community, love,
resiliency, resistance, affirmation, and family was the strength-
based counter to the
negative struggles that we faced. These positive experiences of
community, love, and
family were also prevalent in the midst of the pain and toxicity
within our community.
Still though, we were stuck with the reality of being in schools
that could only address
the problems that they saw in us Black males, but not the root
cause for these larger
issues that we faced. Pac, you discussed this dual reality of
anti-Blackness in the
community via the police and other internal inner-city Black
struggles. Yet, in your
lyrics, you always followed up with some source of
empowerment in spite of your
circumstances, -rooted in education and affirmation of our
struggles and racialized
experiences to serve our community.
“These are lies that we all accepted
184. Say no to drugs but the governments' kept it
The Police Running through our community, killing the unity,
The war on drugs is a war on you and me
And yet, they say this is the Home of The Free
17
But if you ask me, it's all about hypocrisy
The constitution, yo, it don't apply to me
And Lady Liberty? Stupid bitch lied to me
This made me strong, and no one's gonna like what I'm pumpin'
But its wrong to keep someone from learning something
So get up, its time to start nation building
I'm fed up, we gotta start teaching children
That they can be all that they wanna be
There's much more to life than just poverty” (Shakur, 1991).
Photo 1: Spring 1998, (9 year old Ish, with close Patnas that I
grew up with in West
Oakland): Hoover Elementary School graduation, Ghost Town
Neighborhood in West
185. Oakland. Uncle Greg wrapping his arms around myself and my
brothers/friends
The transition to middle school and then high school is when I
began to see stages
of anti-urban Black male identity take fold within educational
spaces via policies and
selective practices from teachers. What I witnessed and
experienced growing up serves as
a qualitative narrative behind the much existing quantitative
data that highlight Black
male deficits via not being engaged in K-12 and being
criminalized, pushed out due to
urban Black male identity. From a quantitative standpoint, only
41 percent of Black
males graduate from high school. Black males are 3.6 times
more likely to be suspended
186. 18
from school than the state average; subsequently, connecting to
school to prison pipeline
and prison industrial complex (Fryer, Heaton, Levitt, &
Murphy, 2006). Black males are
still the highest incarcerated group in America despite Black
Americans comprising less
than 13% of all citizens (Fryer, Heaton, Levitt, & Murphy,
2006). And in in higher
education, Black males continue to have low retention and
graduation rates on a national
level (Harper, 2013).
In qualifying the above quantitative data: As I transitioned to
middle School and
then high School as a student athlete at McClymonds High
School, my friends that are in
the above Hoover elementary picture with me had begun the
beginning stages of the
school to prison pipeline and started being written off as thugs,
kicked out of schools and
187. getting more into street politics. I, on the other hand, -who was
deemed “thuggish” right
along with them up until I became a football player, started
receiving different treatment
from teachers and began to be socialized as a “good student
with potential.” I essentially
started to be socially tracked and separated from my friends
who I had rolled with in
elementary and middle school as I became a standout
McClymonds football player and
pushed into more leadership and college-access programs at
McClymonds.
The larger problem in connection to this narrative is: What
about the rest of the
Black males that were not athletes in west Oakland or inner city
Black America in
general? Why were they not affirmed, judged and essentially
pushed out of the K-12
system?
“June 16th, 1971
Mama gave birth to a hell-raisin' heavenly son
See, the doctor tried to smack me, but I smacked him back
188. 19
My first words was, "Thug for life!" and "Papa, pass the MAC!"
(Shakur, 1994)
Having a mentality that would say “the doctor tried to smack
me, but I smacked him
back” as Tupac mentioned (rebellion/resistance) played out
differently for me as an
athlete in comparison to my friends that did not get socialized
into athletics in high
school. My peers were pushed out of K-12 because of this
“thug” mentality of
rebellion/resistance. Meanwhile, as an athlete I was able to be
engaged in a way that
allowed me to bring my community and racialized experiences
189. to the team and be
developed and channeled in a way that allowed me to grow.
Sports, and many aspects
like the military, are always spaces that “allow” the type of
Black male expression of
resistance that we hood Black males possess. However, what
was out there for Black
males, for my patnas in the picture that I grew up with that are
not athletes? What could
engage them in a way that provides them with a sense of
brotherhood and structure
allowing them to still be the tough/rebellious men that they are?
How do we nurture this
in a successful way as strength given that young Black males
find these strengths and
validation in the streets/gangs and the larger community outside
of the school when the
school does not engage them?
Photo 2: 16 year old Ish in the Hallways of McClymonds high
school, part of the killa
20’s hood in West Oakland.
190. 20
Photo 3: National signing Day, 2007: Myself and 4 of my peers
sign our letter of
intents to the Universities that we would attend, that we
received full ride football
scholarships to. UC Davis, Boise State University, San Jose
State University, South East
Missouri State, University of Washington. One of my friends in
the picture wound up
catching a case and doing 7 years in federal prison before he
could make it to South East
Missouri State. Aside from us few students that received
athletic scholarships and the
students that went to college in general for academics, where
did the rest of the Black
males at McClymonds end up? And Why?
191. 21
Letter to Tupac: Narrative continued:
In connecting back to you Pac, I studied your life and how you
lived a life of pain
and happiness based on your hood’ Black male identity. Your
Black power, your strength
and resiliency proved to be capital. You utilized your racialized
experiences in an art
form that turned you into the rose that grew from the concrete
in becoming a millionaire
and the most influential person that my generation has ever
192. seen. Furthermore, you lived
out Thug Life and put the teachings of your Black Panther
parents to practice, by
shooting two “crooked” and racist White police officers that
were beating up an unarmed
Black man on the streets in order to protect that Black person.
Yet, these same racialized
experiences that you encountered were the source of your
persecution. You were
unlawfully beaten up by racist White cops in Oakland.
Furthermore, the target for FBI
counter intelligence just as the Black Panther Party was due to
your revolutionary
background and rebellion against the system (Newton, 1980).
You were shot 5 times in
an elevator by Black men, members of your very own Black
race, and had falsified rape
allegations against you by a Black woman. This was an attempt
to slander and assassinate
your name and character before the eyes of the world.
Through all of these struggles, you showed strength and
resiliency in continuing
to speak truth to power and continuing to show love and
education to our community
193. with your rap music, poetry, and community engagement. Your
artistry was and is
educational to the Black mases Tupac. This is critical because
your scholarship is
different from those of the formal academy. I could not write a
letter to someone in the
academy that informs my research because I only know his or
her research. However,
Pac, it is your life style and how you lived out the very work
that you produced in your
194. 22
artistry that affects me and informs my work. Through your
own actions, you taught me
that my resiliency, authenticity and racial pride/education of
self is a source of
empowerment. It is a source of my bravery, persistence, and
belief in my own self and
my aspirations.
“Words of Wisdom
Based upon the strength of a nation
Conquer the enemy armed with education
Protect yourself, reach for what you want to do
Know thyself, teach about what we’ve been through
Armed with the knowledge of the place we've been
No one will ever oppress this race again” (Shakur, 1991).
I navigated a predominately White and Asian UC Davis campus
with gold teeth in
my mouth, a fitted hat and a Black beanie in being outspoken
and proactive in seeking
out professors, administrators and anyone necessary to reach my
goals. The sacrifice was
195. worth it as I do not owe a dime to UC Davis due to being on full
ride football scholarship
my entire 4 years. Yet, I was still very poor and struggled at UC
Davis and many people
questioned if I would be able to persist at UC Davis. In addition
to UC Davis being a
foreign environment to me, as a student athlete I had to sleep on
various friends couches
and lived a life of highs and lows as I would go back and forth
from UC Davis to
Oakland to deal with family/community issues while still
navigating UC Davis
throughout my 4 years there.
Still during these experiences, I excelled on campus both as an
athlete and within
Black cultural programs such as Africans/African Americans
Cultivating Education
196. 23
(ACE) and Black Student Union (BSU). The BSU and ACE was
critical in giving me that
space on campus to build community with other Black students
and take part in various
cultural programs that educated us in our history and culture.
This, along with the
relationships that I built within the UC Davis Football program,
definitely gave me a
sense of belonging at UC Davis and contributed to my
persistence. In addition,
leadership experiences such as my time as a Student Outreach
Assistant with Early
Academic Outreach Program (EAOP) contributed to my
engagement on campus.
These experiences not only kept me grounded with a sense of
family and
community on campus, essentially a home away from my home
197. from West Oakland. It
connected me to the necessary staff and faculty on campus that
affirmed me and pushed
me to be the best that I could as an upcoming professional. In
connection to the
community and racialized culture that serves as street capital
from West Oakland, which
is a function of Thug Life: When I found these elements at the
college institution via
programs like EAOP, BSU and ACE, I wound up persisting to
graduate from UC Davis
in 4 years. While I would say that my leadership experiences
and the relationships that I
made across all cultures and racial lines at UC Davis impacted
my success, it was my
Black community and cultural expression from West Oakland
that served as a foundation
for my confidence in building those necessary relationships to
seek out various
experiences on campus.
Photo 4: After beating Sacramento State University in our
Causeway Classic, 2010 or
2011. Amongst diverse peers on the football team, I was known
for representing West
198. Oakland and receiving respect for my authenticity amongst my
teammates throughout my
career. In the middle kneeling, blue head band wrapped around
my shaved head,
24
representing West Oakland with my hand gesture. This street
cultural and Black pride
helped me out a lot while I was at UC Davis. Throughout all of
my struggles, these
strengths helped me survive.
Photo 5: Graduated from UC Davis in 2011.
199. 25
Letter to Tupac: Continued
Pac, it is interesting because after graduating UC Davis I went
on to earn a
Master’s degree from UCLA in 2013 and dove right into a
career in Higher Education,
Student Affairs. My goal was to impact my community just like
you. Similar to your
culture and identity being a strength and yet the subject for your
persecution, I began a
similar experience once I got into the professional world as a
working professional. In my
professional experiences as an EOP Counselor (Black woman
Director), Academic
Advisor at SFSU (White woman Director), Scholar Match
College Advisor (White
woman director), and Program Coordinator for MESA (Black
male director), I have been
judged based on my Black hood’ cultural dress attire, Black
male image, Black
200. language/voice and overall energy. Pac, you were judged by
these things from racist
White law enforcement and judicial system, record company
executives, misguided
Black street gangsters, the media and the bourgeois Blacks in
the world who could not
26
resonate with your racialized and community cultural
experiences. This set foundation for
your rebellious identity and the code of Thug Life. And in this
same token, your cultural
201. expression was celebrated and praised amongst the people that
matter; which is the
masses and the real community and youth that could identify.
And in spite of my
judgments and negative experiences from the power structure in
the education system, I
have always been celebrated and praised for my work by the
people that matter; the
underrepresented students and students from marginalized
communities that I serve.
As I am coming to the end of this letter Tupac, I have one last
protest and
something that I wanted to run by you. I want to articulate that
the leadership amongst the
higher education administrators in my experience have all been
like robots, pushing a
seemingly trained and rehearsed message of the importance of
“code switching,”
“playing the game,” “get to the dinner table,” and “dress
professional.” Of which all of
their advice has been to tone down my Blackness in some
context. This is a form of
respectability politics, whether these individuals want to admit
it or not. The individuals
202. that are in power (the directors and Vice chancellors etc) are
considered to be
“educational leaders” and I am considered to be a talented
individual that does great work
but needs to be “refined.” This is the false construct and the
larger problem of practice
here. This is why I created my own leadership and power for
myself and Black males
alike with the MOB.
27
203. 28
Thug Life: Foundation for MOB Community Based
Programming
Letter to Tupac Continued:
Pac, based on all of the madness that I have dealt with in my
education, life and
professional career, I started an organization called My Other
Brother (MOB) that works
with First Generation College Black students to mentor Black
youth of the hood. Black
males make up the majority of students in this organization.
Students in my organization
have expressed that the organization means community,
authenticity (being able to
express who they are in respect to race and culture) and
militancy to them. Last week we
had a MOB meeting of which we compared what students are
saying about MOB, to the
codes of the Thug Life that you, Mopreme and Mutulu