1. Energy in Emerging Markets
Case Competition
A look at Cuba’s Energy Future
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
JOSEPH M. KATZ GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
2. AGENDA
Executive Summary
Current State - Cuba in 2016
Cuba 2030 Vision
Assumptions for our approach
Recommendations – Phased Transition 2016 to 2030
Resilient Infrastructure
Competitive Advantage of Cuba
Financing Cuba’s Energy Transformation
Risk Analysis
Conclusion
3. Executive Summary
Task at hand
Reduce costs and
inefficiencies of existing
energy infrastructure
Provide reliable fuel-
sourcing and technology
import options
Financial impetus and
upgradation of energy
infrastructure
Find right energy mix
to ensure energy
sufficiency and
resilience
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
4. Executive Summary
Our Approach and Recommendations
Approach
• Benchmarking with countries of comparable installed capacity & social
scenario
• Cost analysis and research on funding
• Historical data analysis
Recommendations
• Focus on energy security
• Exploring global avenues
• Building a robust & resilient infrastructure
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
5. Current State
Cuba in 2016
China, Russia, Canada, Brazil, Italy, Netherlands, Singapore, and Spain
Export Partners
Drop in crude oil imports from 100,000 BBL/D to 53,500 BBL/D
Venezuela’s Economic Crisis
Muted by falling sugarcane production
Potential for Bagasse
USD 1.8 Billion (12% of total imports)
Import of Oil and Oil
Products
Opportunities for US and foreign players in energy, agro and other sectors
Diplomatic Relations
86% less than that in the US
Per Person Energy
Consumption
USD 8.8 Billion
Tourism and Medical
Services Revenue
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
6. Cuba 2030 Vision
8%
8%
7%
1%
22%
54%
PROPOSED ENERGY MIX
Solar Biomass Wind
Hydro Natural Gas Oil
Additional capacity of 2,976 MW with the below mix
Natural Gas – 832 MW
Biomass (Bagasse & Marabu) – 755 MW
Solar Energy – 700 MW
Wind – 633 MW
Hydro Electricity – 56 MW
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
7. Cuba 2030 Vision
Key Highlights
2976 MW of additional Capacity with the proposed energy mix
20% of oil-based plants gradually phased out and replaced with Natural Gas plants
10% improvement in PLF in existing installed capacity by 2030
Technology imports ensure increased sugarcane yields, increasing bagasse output
Flexible trade relations with US resulting in import of Natural Gas
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
8. Key Assumptions
Projected peak demand growth rate is 4% YOY
Cost of domestic oil production is based on market price of crude (USD 40 per BBL)
Cost to develop/install generating technologies is based on EIA report 2015
Auction price is based on Peru which has similar installed capacity
Distribution and refining cost of crude is based on US rates (USD 25 per BBL)
Cost of overhauling the network is based on the estimates by Dr. Manuel Cereijo
Export/Import revenues based on report by MIT and projected to grow at 4% YOY
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
9. Recommendations
Phase 1: 2016 to 2020
Energy Sector
• Power Auction of
2976 MW to generate
$1.02 B
• UE to implement
differential tariff
Fuel Market
• Access global fuel
market to minimize
dependence on single
supplier (Venezuela)
Encourage FDI
• Unify CUC & CUP
• Usufruct
• Low interest rate
• Corporate tax credits
• BITs with Canada & BRIC
Education Sector
• Increase education
opportunities for Latin
American students
• Build knowledge
capabilities across
sectors
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
10. Recommendations
Phase 2: 2020 to 2030
Power Plants
• Improve PLF
• Phase out oil-based &
replace with natural
gas plants
Top Line/Bottom Line
• Restructure UE
• Save costs through the
proposed energy mix
• Sale of carbon credits
Agro-Technology
• HYV seeds for increase
in bagasse production
(19.86 Mt)
• Increase bio ethanol
production through
cellulosic ethanol
process
Smart Grid
• Monitor, analyze,
control & communicate
capabilities to delivery
system
• Adds to resilience
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
11. Resilient Infrastructure
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
12. Cuba’s Competitive Advantage
Porter’s Diamond Model
Chance
Government
Firm Strategy,
Structure and
Rivalry
Factor
Conditions
Demand
Conditions
Related and
supporting
industries
Skilled labor
Knowledge import
Capital/Infrastructure
Home demand changes
Increasing size of Cuban market
Early saturation
Tourism
Education
Service
Cigar
Rum
Sugar
Cuba’s unique culture
Public’s adaptability to Government policy
Increase in domestic competitiveness
Emphasis on globalization
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
13. Cost and Savings estimation in 2030
COSTS BENEFITS
$4.4 Billion savings in 2030
20% reduction over the forecasted
requirements of Oil and Diesel
Approx. revenues from tourism &
medical services: $16 B
Export revenues:
Cigars ($770 M)
Rum ($217 M)
Sugar ($734 M)
Increased energy security
Proposed mix: $7.9 Billion
$7 B – renewable
$831 M – NG
Purchase of NG: $80 M
Imports:
US ($8 M)
Canada ($48 M)
Russia ($160 M)
China ($289 M)
Overhaul of transmission lines:
$40.32 M
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
14. Our Funding Propositions
Union Electrica
holding company
PPAs set up for UE
D&S for purchase
of power at least
cost
Tariff structure at
sale- retail end
UE Distribution
and Sale
UE Centralized
Generation
Private Players
Generation
(Renewables)
Transmission
UE D & S pays the
Transmission costs
- contracts
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
15. Funding Mechanism
JICA/USAID/UNDP
• Purchases
the bonds
of CPA
Center for Power
Assistance
• Issues
bonds to
the above
UE Holding • Receives funding for
high value projects
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
16. Risk Analysis
Risk Segments Risks Risk Mitigation
Country
Nationalization
Natural disasters
Corruption
US Trade relations
CUP & CUC
High Capital at Risk
International arbitration
Resilient infrastructure
Strengthen judiciary & stronger IP laws
BRIC & Canada
Devalue CUP, use it for FDI
Insurance/Hedging
Technology
Equipment obsolescence
High fixed costs
Communication channels
Modernize telecom infrastructure (Wi-Fi)
Input
Change in input prices
Security of supplies/availability
Long term contracts/hedging/diversify the supplier
countries
Output
Sale of power
Power trading
Price, tariff, PPA
Funding from BITs countries
Independent power regulator
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
17. Conclusion -
Impact and validation of our proposition
Strong
Cuban
Diamond
46%
NG/Renewables
$18 B savings
Restructuring
of Union
Electrica
Potential for
ties with the US
“If we talk about energy
security versus energy
independence, most certainly
the energy security is
preferable, and this can be
achieved through a membership
in integrated market”
–Vasile Iuga
Country Partner for PwC, Romania
Executive Summary Current State Cuba 2030 Vision Assumptions Phase-1 Phase-2 Resilience
Competitive
Advantage
Financing Risk Analysis Conclusion
19. Appendix
References:
Cuban Govt. statistics: http://www.one.cu/
International Energy Agency: http://www.iea.org/
Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/
Sugar cane statistics: http://sugarcane.org/
Snippets on the Cuban economy: http://thecubaneconomy.com/
‘The Electric Power Sector in Cuba: Potential ways to increase efficiency and sustainability’,
Juan AB Belt, Director US Agency for International Development
‘Republic of Cuba Power Sector Infrastructure Assessment’ by Dr. Manuel Cereijo
20. Current imports of oil & projections for
Bagasse production
Current Imports of Oil and Oil products and estimated
expenditure spent by Cuba on Oil including cost of domestic
production and refining (Conservative estimate of costs based
on quantity from IEA database)
Current and projections for production of Bagasse based on
data from sugarcane.org and cubaneconomy.com
21. Cost of proposed energy mix
Cost of the proposed Energy mix and Revenue generation from
auction based on data from ‘Electricity Auctions’- World Bank Study
24. Data analysis sheets
Cuba Expenditure on
Energy revised
assumptions for power
Finance Master Ideas from
Understanding
Utilities and
Deregulation
Ideas from
Understanding Utilities
and Deregulation
Editor's Notes
Explain Energy security as opposed to Energy independence
Cuba:
CIA factbook
77% Urbanized, 99.8% Literacy
USD 129B in 2014
Growth in 2012 3% 2013 2.7% 2014 1.3%
GDP composition, Agri 4%, Industry 25%, Services 72%
Industrial growth rate 9.8%
Labor : 5.1 Million
Inflation 4.6%
Imports: USD 13.5 Billion, Petroleum, Food, Machinery, Chemicals; Venezuela: 32%, China 18%, Spain 10%, Brazil 5%
Exports: Petroleum, Nickel, Medical Products, Sugar, Tobacco, Fish, Citrus, Coffee
Export Partners: Canada 18%, Venezuela 14%, China 13%, Netherlands 7%
Per 100 persons, only 30 have access to mobile. Internet users: 30% Internet. Pvt citizens are prohibited from buying computers/Internet without authorization.
Exports in 2015: USD 1.5 Billion (Tourism: USD 2.5B, balance medical), Imports: USD 12 B
Why we have gone for Govt. Policy
Considering the fact that some of the other Latin American economies have 40% renewable generation, we agreed on a realistic estimate of 25% Renewables over the next 14 years. Therefore, when we studied the Energy policy document of the country given Hon. Raul Berriero, the Vice minister for the ministry of energy and mines in Cuba, we saw that the Cuban govt. proposal was realistic and conservative.
GDP per capita of Peru similar to Cuba
Growth rate of the economy similar
36% - 40% Renewable
Low frequency high impact event is a Black Swan
High frequency, low impact is the PLF and Availability.
Related and Supported Industries:
Auction of Generating capacity in the renewable space – More firms will assemble the poles and turbines (wind), assemble of the Solar PV (commercial – ground based installation), Manufacture of high efficiency boilers for bagasse, manufacture of components can also take place in Cuba
For this, Govt. policies, sops and incentives for private industries are important
Factor Conditions:
We estimate that the year on year growth of energy demand as a result of tourism is 2.2% and hence 1.8% of the YOY growth of energy demand is coming from other sectors like manufacturing.
USD 4.4 Billion based on a conservative estimate, assuming PLF improvement in both cases as well as the 2015 Dollars as base for comparison. The discounted (NPV) benefit is USD 4.4 Billion, benefit in 2030 in 2015 dollars
The additional Exports will also lead to more Imports from the Unites States if the embargo is lifted. This leads to more contribution by US based companies to expand their market for Agricultural machinery, Power infrastructure and equipment, HYV seeds as well as Agricultural product exports
Link the Cuba Costs Excel for the figures as well as for Export and Import
Using 2020 as the base when the embargo is lifted, we project that the Export revenues from Cigars come to USD 1.4 Billion, Sugar USD 1.3 B, Rum 403 Million
Regulated Corporatization – of UE two companies and Overall authority leeway to Pvt players
Reverse auctions for generation – related - generation based incentives and Accelerated depreciation
If possible, also hold auctions or JVs for NG generation so that private participation is present in Fossil generation as well.
Transmission is hived off to private players, therefore, the transmission infrastructure is auctioned to private parties (Revenue to UE) and then the UE pays the transmission companies based on some least cost contract rates for distribution and retail sale or Location Based Marginal Pricing
Pvt players encouraged to use higher voltage transmission lines
UE can adopt some measures like sale and lease back to get additional funds
An Independent regulator can be set up for regulating the tariffs of both fossil and renewable sources above UE
For generation, PPA can be based on competitive bidding or LT contracts/MOU
Distribution efficiency can also be improved by franchising it off to private players on behalf of UE D and S
Incentives for private generators:
Reverse Auction is held to have price discovery and least cost
Feed in Tariffs – Feed in to the grid, is the subsidy for the auction – Operation subsidy
Accelerated Depreciation – for capital equipment and lower taxes – Capital subsidy
Generation based incentives for centralized and renewables – which depends on whether we are sticking to the schedule or not/for the higher MW that we generate as well as higher MW over the load scheduled for us
Why there is no pvt in the D and S
1. The govt has to have some control over the electricity chain – that is the point of contact in the electricity cycle, Lorrin Philipson and H Lee Willis
2. There are some inefficiencies if we adopt Pvt. In the D and S sector, The Additional benefit derived is not much above the Marginal Cost
3. California case, costs to the end consumer shoots up, so North Carolina stopped deregulation of the D and S – Willis and Willis
Why we didn’t go for Distributed generation
The fuel costs are a significant portion of DG. There have been only small installations of the same with Renewables comprising a minor portion based on our research. Plus they suffer from diseconomies of scale. The utility can set an average set of rates and in isolated areas where T and D is accessible or the area develops, the cost of the utility falls below that of the DG
-Lorren Phillipson Willis, H Lee Willis
How Funding? Direct loan from the parties or asking the CPA to issue Bonds to HNI, Institutional Investors, BIT countries development arms like JICA – these bonds should be guaranteed by the Govt. of Cuba. To isolate risks to this particular entity, this should provide funds to the UE holding company only - again to isolate risks
BITS – Bilateral Trade/Investments treaties, enter/to be entered with Scandinavian countries, Canada etc
Insurance
Long run establish Power trading for transmitters to buy from traders; Transmitters – barred from trading, long term Power contracts
Attract HNI, Institutional investors; Generators should not be involved with the Transmission.
Long term SLA with the companies investing in the country with funding from the financial arms of the companies doing the project
The revenues from the sale of carbon credits are assumed to be minimal
Involve Energy Saving Companies (ESCO) to conduct feasibility studies for Efficiency improvement in G,T & D, Shared Saving contract and Direct Client financing can be explored
Chinese participation and funding for CPA as well as Pvtz of the Generation. As well as NG plants
Telecom infrastructure: Smart grids require state of the communication tech
Renewables need real time scheduling, which again demands sophisticated equipments
For PPA and Tariffs, we need an independent power regulator.