The Centre for Children and Young People’s Participation, University of Central Lancashire. Presentation for seminar Series 2014, Children and Social Justice, May 2014 'Embedding children and young people’s participation in health services and research'

1. Embedding children & young people’s
participation in health services and
research
Louca-Mai
Brady
*Picture courtesy Investing in Children

2. My background
• PhD: embedding CYP’s participation in
health services and research
• Freelance researcher, including work on
PPI
• Background in applied social research,
including leading on CYP’s involvement at
NCB Research Centre
• Member of INVOLVE

3. Key issues
• Despite increasing profile of CYP’s
participation, there’s a lack of evidence
about how to ensure it is meaningful,
effective and sustained
• Limited examples of how guidance is
applied in practice
• Variable understanding of how principles
and practice of public involvement,
engagement and CYP’s participation
intersect

4. Where I want to get to:
Embedding children and young
people’s participation in health
services and research:
• How is CYP’s participation defined and operationalised?
• What does it mean to ‘embed’ CYP’s participation within
health services and research?
• What needs to be in place for participation to be
meaningful, effective and sustainable - at different levels,
for different groups and in different settings?
• What are the barriers and challenges to meaningful,
effective and sustainable participation and how can
these be addressed?

5. The journey
• Literature
• Critical inquiries
• Action research in
two case studies

6. Navigating the landscape
• Health & Social Care & Children and Families Acts
• New NHS structures and processes – Healthwatch,
CCGs, NHS England, Public Health England & changes
to public health & local authorities
• Continued NIHR commitment to public involvement
• Children and young people’s participation, rights and the
UNCRC
• Campaigning work of organisations working with CYPs
• Sociology of childhood
• Growth of citizenship and public engagement as issues
in policy and practice

7. “If the fundamental purpose of the
Government’s proposed changes to
the NHS – putting the patient first – is
to be made a reality, the system that
emerges must be grounded in
systematic patient involvement to the
extent that shared decision making is
the norm.”
NHS Future Forum Patient
Involvement and Public Accountability
Report (June 2011).

8. Children’s Health Outcomes Forum:
Recommendation: All health organisations must
demonstrate how they have listened to the voice of
children and young people, and how this will improve
their health outcomes
Government response: The Government’s
modernisation of the health and care systems will improve
the quality and efficiency of the services children, young
people, and their families receive …with children young
people and their families involved in decisions about their
care and the design of services

9. • Article 12 . Every child and young person has the
right to express his or her views freely in all matters
affecting them
• Article 13. Every child and young person has the
right to freedom of expression, including the right to
all kinds of information and ideas
• Article 24. Children have the right to good quality
health care and information to help them stay
healthy
UN Convention on the Rights
of the Child (UNCRC)

10. General comment
Article 12 highlights the importance of children’s participation...This
includes their views on all aspects of health provisions, including,
for example, what services are needed, how and where they are
best provided, barriers to accessing or using services, the quality
of the services and the attitudes of health professionals, how to
strengthen children’s capacities to take increasing levels of
responsibility for their own health and development, and how to
involve them more effectively in the provision of services, as peer
educators. States are encouraged to conduct regular participatory
consultations, which are adapted to the age and maturity of the child,
and research with children, and to do this separately with their
parents, in order to learn about their health challenges, developmental
needs and expectations as a contribution to the design of effective
interventions and health programmes” (UN, 2013).

11. Key issues from July workshop:
who is involved and how?
• Equality of opportunity and reflecting
diversity
• Creating opportunities for participation
• Making participation appealing and
relevant to CYP
• Roles and responsibilities for participation
• Support for staff

12. Challenges and
barriers
• Complex and changing
landscape
• Prioritising CYP’s participation within
existing structures and processes
• Understanding participation and children’s
rights
• Power
• Challenges to recruiting young people and
planning involvement

13. Case studies:
• NHS Trust working with a voluntary sector
organisation to support CYP’s participation
in the development and delivery of a
Community Children’s Health Partnership
• Young people’s involvement in an
adaptation and feasibility study of an
intervention for young people who misuse
alcohol and drugs

14. Characteristics of action
research
• Research in action, rather than research
about action
• Collaborative democratic partnership
• Research concurrent with action
• Sequence of events and an approach to
problem solving
Coghlan and Brannick, 2010

15. Community Children’s Health
Partnership
• Working collaboratively with groups of
staff, young people who have been
involved in participation activity and other
stakeholders, through a series of
workshops and other activities
• First cycle: developing a strategy
• Second cycle: putting strategy into
practice

16. Stage 1: Process
Sept 13 Oct 13 Nov 13
Core group
meeting
Continues
bi-monthly
Core group
meeting
Participation
strategy workshop 1
Participation
strategy workshop 2
Participation
strategy workshops
3 & 4 – includes
young people’s
group
Dec 13
Stage
2
Young
people’s
group
Focus groups with
parents, managers
& CCG
Feb 14

17. Whole systems approach to
participation*
• Culture: demonstrating a commitment to participation
• Structure: planning, development and resourcing of
participation; including identifying key staff, roles and
resources required for implementation
• Practice: ways of working, methods of involvement, skills
and knowledge required
• Review: recording, monitoring and evaluation systems
which will enable organisation to evidence change
affected by participation
*Social Care Institute of Excellence (2006) Practice Guide 11

20. Involving young people in a
clinical trial

21. Plan A…
• Recruit an advisory group of 10-12 young
people who had previously used drug and
alcohol services and would be actively
engaged throughout the project.
• Members of this group, along with parent
representatives, would then be supported
to attend trial steering committee
meetings.

22. What have the meetings involved?
1. Commenting on project leaflet and information sheet.
2. Flipchart exercise to think about the important people in YPs
life and why they are helpful/supporting or
unhelpful/unsupportive.
3. Card sort exercise about what YP find helpful, or what are
barriers, to YP engaging with services.
4. Writing an open letter to an important person about what
it’s like to have a problem with alcohol or drugs, and how YP
would like that person to help them.
5. Drawing YPs social network so we can have ‘real’ examples
in the Y-SBNT intervention.
6. Commenting on a worksheet (which will be used in the Y-
SBNT intervention) which looks at which areas of life YP
might want to work on during treatment sessions.
7. Giving ideas for what’s important to include in a newsletter
for YP involved with the project.
8. Meeting with the 2 trial researchers to test all the
questionnaires.

23. What we’ve learned
• YP’s involvement has been extremely helpful and has
informed key elements of the intervention.
• Managing sensitive nature of topics discussed.
• Relationship between Researcher & YP.
• Complex needs & range of services accessed by this
group of YP – e.g. mental health problems.
• This is a seldom heard and group of YP who can be
difficult to access and to keep engaged.
• Traditional advisory group model in one location does
not seem to be effective.
• Flexible, local and YP-centred engagement has worked
better but YP also want to meet the whole team and
each other!
• Different understanding and expectations about what is
possible for YP’s involvement– also influenced by time &
other resources.

24. Plan B
• Shift from a traditional Advisory Group
model to something more localised & led by YP.
• On-going recruitment.
• More workshops or consultations with YP in services
they use and/or near where they live.
• If YP are then interested in on-going involvement in the
project will be given opportunity to be involved in smaller
and more flexible young advisors group.
• Options for input via email, text, Skype & social media
(eg Facebook) as well as face-to-face.
• Report to trial steering committee with input
from/attendance by YP if interested.

25. ‘Embedded’ participation is…?
• Integrated and integral
• Meaningful
• Well-supported
• Inclusive and flexible
• Realistic
• Collaborative and sharing learning
• Demonstrates impact

26. Young Health Participation
• Blog about CYP’s participation in health
and social care, including presentations
and reports from recent workshops:
www.younghealthparticipation.com
@louca_mai