SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Building an approach to RCT onboarding
Developing a Standardized Onboarding Process
Lauren Brischke
Agenda
• Overview
• Methodology
• Results
• Recommendations
Project Overview
Objective
• Recommendations for improving the onboarding process for new RCTs
• Creating a standardized process for bringing RCTs onto their assigned
Living Units after CIP training
Overview
• Onboarding is an important part of overall retention strategy
• Inconsistency in onboarding processes across living units leads to
variation in RCTs experiences
• Re-evaluating this process will help build a more structured approach
The Revolving Door
• “it’s like a revolving door—we are just making clones that come and go”
• High turnover rates and vacancies for RCTs
• Onboarding is one way to address new-hire turnover rates
• Answers question “how can we keep the revolving door from spinning out of
control?”
38%
16%
15%
11%
8%
5%
4%
3%
Percentage of Employees
RCT
LPN/Other Nursing
Medical
Other
Building/Maintenance
Office/Administrative
Food Services
RCS
Classification
Methodology
• Interviews
• UD’s, RCS’s, and Job Coaches to learn about current process
• Focus Groups –to gain opinions
• New RCTs and preceptors
• Survey
• For New RCTs
• Evaluated the impact of onboarding practices on comfort level
• Literature Review
• Research best practices from other leading organizations
#1
Supporting Evidence:
Key Result : Some living units currently apply some very positive
onboarding practices.
Best Practices Summary Table
Table 1.3. Best Practices at CWC Summary Table
Onboarding Activity Best Practice
Pre- Transition
Preparation
 UD Introductions/ Unit descriptions in NEO
 Exposed to living unit before transition in training
Introduction  Meet UD on first day
 Meet all team members
Tour  Informal introductions during tour
Unit-Based Training  exposed to each apartment/shift
RCT Role & Expectations
 Talk in depth with nurse, psych, etc.
 review job expectations
Socialization  Use a welcome board
Preceptor Program  RCS collaborates with preceptor
Evaluation/Monitoring  UD check in with new RCTs on daily rounds
RCS, Job Coach, UD role  RCS works side by side with RCTs
 job coaches check in in the first few weeks
 UD participates in the process
Survey Findings
Correlation Analysis
Best Practices correlate with
confidence/knowledge levels in
first week/first month
• Opportunity to meet Senior
leaders (.42)
• Job coach there to answer
questions (.58)
• Unit-Based Training(.64)
#1 Recommendation: Apply the best practices used by some units at
the center to other units.
Action Steps:
(1)Include best practices in the new employee toolkit as part of checklist
(2)Set reoccurring agenda item for a current meeting to share best
practices, knowledge, experiences
Key Result : There is no systematic, structured approach to
onboarding across living units.
#2
Supporting Evidence
 Focus group theme: need increased consistency
 Variation in terminology, perceptions of roles, and levels of involvement
 Survey: Variation in information RCTs want more of
“It’s not consistent center -wide—we want consistency.”
45% 45%
15%
25%
20% 20%
5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
PercentageofRCTs
Topic
Please indicate the topic(s) you would have liked more information about.
Recommendation: Develop a comprehensive new employee toolkit
that includes checklists and a written onboarding timeline.
#2
Action Steps:
1. Create a new hire checklist for supervisors
2. Include
a. Logistics information
b. Specific onboarding timeline
c. Roles & Responsibilities
d. Key skills list
EX: Consistency, teamwork, communication, helpful
e. Advice
EX: “Don’t rush or get overwhelmed “Observe how other RCTs react",
"Carefully read DLP”, “Get to know people’s names fast”
3. Communicate to all members
4. Educate and train managers
5. Post resources electronically
Key Result : New RCTs experience an information overload during
the transition from CIP training to their assigned living unit.
#3
Supporting Evidence:
Focus Group theme: need more time
“There is lots of information, will probably take me the whole summer to learn”
“Already trying to retain a lot of information & DLP is not a small book”
“An extra week of working with another RCT would allow more time to absorb
information”
“We need more time to get to know residents better”
“Too much information”
#3 Recommendation: Modify the time period RCTs have to learn
unit-based information so it is longer and more participatory.
Action Steps:
(1) Create a realistic timeline
(2) Increase hands-on experiences
(3) Train employees on assigned unit
(4) Remind information over time
Pace delivery of onboarding information
“it’s a marathon not a sprint”
Assimilated
Employee
Onboarding
Length
Orientation
Facilities
Orientation
Paperwork
Company
Handbook
Company
Policies
Tour
Cultural
Mentor
On-the-job
Training
Feedback
Process
Key Result : There is no consistent approach to personal
welcoming from key people.
#4
Supporting Evidence:
 Survey data shows “I was introduced to my co-workers” received 87%
 Focus group theme:
variation in introductions
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
job coach was there
tour of living unit
my unit welcomed me
introduced to my co-workers
met with supervisor within week
opportunity to meet leaders
clear job duties and expectations
resources I needed
someone was assigned
assigned person welcoming
unit based training prepared me
skills check-offs were used
feedback on my performance
% of Respondants
OnboardingActivity
Please answer to following according to your experience: Yes or No
“They may act welcoming, but sometimes not that welcoming”
“there were no introductions”
#4 Recommendation: Speed the development of important working
relationships for new RCTs.
Action Steps:
(1) Managers welcome new employees their first day
(2) Provide framework for socialization in assimilation checklist
(3) Identify key people for new RCT to meet
(4) Include leadership profiles that include photos
(5) Prepare RCTs and others for productive conversations
a. clarify objectives of meetings
b. provide list of talking points
(6)Make formal and informal introductions
(7) Invite new RCTs to key meetings
(8) Conduct consistent check-ins with relationships
Preparation
-prepare checklist
-set up meetings
- brief bios, background
Delivery
- formal/informal
introductions
Follow-Through
-check in consistently
Key Result: There is an opportunity to improve the understanding of the
preceptor role and responsibilities for both the new RCT and the RCT preceptor.
#5
Supporting Evidence
 Survey indicates RCTs want to learn more information about roles/expectations
45% 45%
15%
25%
20% 20%
5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
PercentageofRespondants
Topic
Please indicate the topic(s) you would have liked more information about.
• Focus group comments
o “It was kind of scary; I was new and training right away and it was different”
o “RCTs look at it like an ‘easy day’ or ‘rest day’”
• Survey: preceptor contributes most to onboarding experience
52%
13%
48%
30%
4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Preceptor Introductions Unit-Based
Training
Feedback Other
PercentageofResponses
Onboarding Activity
Which activity contributed the most to your experience starting to work on the unit?
Recommendation: Create a more structured preceptor program.
#5
Action Steps:
(1) Recruit voluntary preceptors
(2) Educate preceptors about role and responsibilities
(3) Have consistent preceptors
(4) Develop and communicate clear expectations
(5) Preceptors collaborate with the RCS
(6) Preceptor and new RCT should remain together
(7) Increase recognition
(8) Monitor Preceptor Performance
Key Result: There is no consistent process owner(s) for the
onboarding program that integrates the activities of stakeholders or
holds them accountable.
#6
Supporting Evidence:
No consistent ownership of specific activities
“most of the time this person does it” or “when I am here this is what
happens-but I don’t know about when I’m not here”
Interview “there is no point person for the whole process—who is going to
help them when they get onto the unit?”
Variation in levels of responsibility associated with roles
EX: job coaches providing reminders to a “variety of roles including
coach, parent and others”
Recommendation: Increase accountability for the onboarding
process by establishing an owner of the whole process and defining
who controls various steps.
#6
Action Steps:
(1) Identify a process leader
(2) document key roles, responsibilities
(3) Increase leadership involvement
Survey: largest correlation for confidence in
first week is “the opportunity to meet senior leaders”
Key Result: There is an opportunity for better preparing new RCTs
for working with individuals at CWC.
#7
Supporting Evidence:
Survey responses:
• Unit-Based training on all apartments
• Train in assigned living unit
• Increase interaction with residents in assigned building
Focus group themes
Transition is overwhelming
“Hectic, shocked, never knew a G-tube existed”
“Stressful and felt rushed, behind and frustrated”
“There was a lot of frustration, just kind of
thrown out there”
Training isn’t realistic
“Once on the units it was different than the way to pass
certification”
“Should train on each apartment evenly so you get
comfortable going to all apartments”
“If you work the way they teach you, you won’t get anything
done—especially bathing”
#7
Action Steps:
(1) Have workforce SMT develop a multidisciplinary team
including leadership, Unit Directors, and other relevant employees
(2) Identify content areas to include in Unit-Based Training
• Active Treatment
• Remind of NEO content
• Emphasize CWC guidelines and policies
 how to get acclimated and how its different than CIP training
(3) Evaluate variables such as:
• time requirements of new RCTs
• how consistent training can be made across units
(4) Develop an improvement plan to modify Unit-Based Training
Recommendation: Expand Unit-Based training to better
prepare new RCTs for working with individuals at CWC.
Key Result : There is not a performance evaluation system for the
onboarding process.
#8
NEO evaluations but no follow-up after NEO
No measures of the long-term impact of onboarding activities
Recommendation: : Seek further feedback on onboarding
program from new employees
Action Steps:
(1)Identify Process measures (were they introduced, was a checklist used)
(2) Identify Results/outcome measures (reduced turnover, increased
retention/confidence)
(3)Monitor onboarding program effectiveness over time
Key Takeaways & Guiding Principles
Importance of applying best practices
Increase accountability
Increase consistency
Support implementation
Everything Matters:
bring greater attention to each and every aspect of onboarding process
Little things make a big difference
Checklist, introducing yourself
Any Questions or Comments?

More Related Content

What's hot

IGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBF
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBFIGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBF
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBFInnovation Agency
 
Health care huddle iu health evaluation
Health care huddle iu health evaluationHealth care huddle iu health evaluation
Health care huddle iu health evaluationTyler Wysong
 
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2Innovation Agency
 
Pres 5 maura flynn systematic review
Pres 5   maura flynn systematic reviewPres 5   maura flynn systematic review
Pres 5 maura flynn systematic reviewHSLG
 
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcareEvaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcareDaniel McLinden
 
Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?
Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?
Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?Ahmad Chamy
 
Grad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentation
Grad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentationGrad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentation
Grad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentationSamuel Mann
 
Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...
Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...
Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...NHS England
 
Evaluating Student Success Initiatives
Evaluating Student Success InitiativesEvaluating Student Success Initiatives
Evaluating Student Success InitiativesBradley Vaden
 
Syllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audio
Syllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audioSyllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audio
Syllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audioAlexandra Barrett
 
Syllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pm
Syllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pmSyllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pm
Syllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pmAlexandra Barrett
 
Evidence-Based Management presentation
Evidence-Based Management presentationEvidence-Based Management presentation
Evidence-Based Management presentationIoannis Nikolaou
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action researchAJAL A J
 

What's hot (20)

IGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBF
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBFIGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBF
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Continuous Improvement Part 1 #QIBBF
 
Health care huddle iu health evaluation
Health care huddle iu health evaluationHealth care huddle iu health evaluation
Health care huddle iu health evaluation
 
Evidence-Based Management: This is how WE do it.
Evidence-Based Management: This is how WE do it.Evidence-Based Management: This is how WE do it.
Evidence-Based Management: This is how WE do it.
 
Bath University taster event: Evidence-Based Decision Making
Bath University taster event: Evidence-Based Decision MakingBath University taster event: Evidence-Based Decision Making
Bath University taster event: Evidence-Based Decision Making
 
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2
IGNITE! Building Blocks of Quality Improvement part 2
 
Pres 5 maura flynn systematic review
Pres 5   maura flynn systematic reviewPres 5   maura flynn systematic review
Pres 5 maura flynn systematic review
 
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcareEvaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
 
MPA5014 U10A1
MPA5014 U10A1MPA5014 U10A1
MPA5014 U10A1
 
Evidence-Based HR Management
Evidence-Based HR ManagementEvidence-Based HR Management
Evidence-Based HR Management
 
Evidence-Based Human Resource Management
Evidence-Based Human Resource ManagementEvidence-Based Human Resource Management
Evidence-Based Human Resource Management
 
01.02.09 Report2
01.02.09 Report201.02.09 Report2
01.02.09 Report2
 
Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?
Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?
Can Bureaucratic Organizations Really Innovate?
 
Grad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentation
Grad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentationGrad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentation
Grad Cert Tertiary Learning and Teaching, my APL presentation
 
Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...
Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...
Break-out session slides Session 2: 2.1 Time for Care programme impact to dat...
 
Evaluating Student Success Initiatives
Evaluating Student Success InitiativesEvaluating Student Success Initiatives
Evaluating Student Success Initiatives
 
Syllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audio
Syllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audioSyllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audio
Syllabus how to-presentation_no_animation_with_audio
 
Syllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pm
Syllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pmSyllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pm
Syllabus how to-presentation_final_revision_sat_7.48pm
 
Evidence-Based Management presentation
Evidence-Based Management presentationEvidence-Based Management presentation
Evidence-Based Management presentation
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Communicating Evidence to Influence Decisions
Communicating Evidence to Influence DecisionsCommunicating Evidence to Influence Decisions
Communicating Evidence to Influence Decisions
 

Similar to CWC OIP PPT presentation

Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...
A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...
A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...SEDA
 
coaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptx
coaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptxcoaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptx
coaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptxShree Shree
 
Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...
Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...
Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...Sandra Bras
 
Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...
Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...
Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...NIHR CLAHRC West Midlands
 
Scoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCIS
Scoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCISScoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCIS
Scoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCISIriss
 
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and trainingTraining needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and trainingCharles Cotter, PhD
 
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017CHC Connecticut
 
NCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory Burst
NCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory BurstNCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory Burst
NCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory BurstCHC Connecticut
 
Sarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark Dransfield
Sarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark DransfieldSarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark Dransfield
Sarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark DransfieldSEDA
 
Cataloging training research
Cataloging training research Cataloging training research
Cataloging training research robin fay
 
Project ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with Leaders
Project ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with LeadersProject ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with Leaders
Project ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with LeadersCHC Connecticut
 
BEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and Confirmation
BEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and ConfirmationBEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and Confirmation
BEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and Confirmationzorengubalane
 
Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...
Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...
Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...cilass.slideshare
 
Connecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development Programme
Connecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development ProgrammeConnecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development Programme
Connecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development ProgrammeBASPCAN
 
CPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System Improvement
CPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System ImprovementCPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System Improvement
CPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System ImprovementHealth Evidence™
 
Supervision with the team and organisation in mind webinar
Supervision with the team and organisation in mind webinarSupervision with the team and organisation in mind webinar
Supervision with the team and organisation in mind webinarGP Strategies Limited
 

Similar to CWC OIP PPT presentation (20)

Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
 
In-Depth Interviews: Techniques and Best Practices
In-Depth Interviews: Techniques and Best PracticesIn-Depth Interviews: Techniques and Best Practices
In-Depth Interviews: Techniques and Best Practices
 
A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...
A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...
A new frontier for professional development: developing flexible pathways to ...
 
coaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptx
coaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptxcoaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptx
coaching_session_csmh_2020_final.pptx
 
Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...
Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...
Research Master's thesis: The importance of eLearning in transforming organis...
 
Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...
Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...
Rapid qualitative analysis vs the 'traditional approach': early findings and ...
 
Scoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCIS
Scoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCISScoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCIS
Scoping wkshp_Quality improvement_CELCIS
 
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and trainingTraining needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training
 
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
 
NCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory Burst
NCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory BurstNCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory Burst
NCA TBC Session 5 Standardization Case Study Theory Burst
 
Sarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark Dransfield
Sarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark DransfieldSarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark Dransfield
Sarah Floyd, Vicky Davies, Fiona Smart, Rachael Carkett & Mark Dransfield
 
Cataloging training research
Cataloging training research Cataloging training research
Cataloging training research
 
Interview workshop slides final
Interview workshop slides  finalInterview workshop slides  final
Interview workshop slides final
 
Project ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with Leaders
Project ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with LeadersProject ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with Leaders
Project ECHO QI: Managing Up - Enhancing Your Relationship with Leaders
 
BEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and Confirmation
BEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and ConfirmationBEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and Confirmation
BEST PRACTICE: Identification, Documentation, and Confirmation
 
Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...
Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...
Rossiter, Biggs and Petrulis (2008), Innovative problem-based learning approa...
 
Connecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development Programme
Connecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development ProgrammeConnecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development Programme
Connecting Evidence to Outcomes: Practioner Development Programme
 
CPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System Improvement
CPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System ImprovementCPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System Improvement
CPHA 2014: Partnerships for Health System Improvement
 
2.5 Investigating formative frameworks
2.5 Investigating formative frameworks2.5 Investigating formative frameworks
2.5 Investigating formative frameworks
 
Supervision with the team and organisation in mind webinar
Supervision with the team and organisation in mind webinarSupervision with the team and organisation in mind webinar
Supervision with the team and organisation in mind webinar
 

CWC OIP PPT presentation

  • 1. Building an approach to RCT onboarding Developing a Standardized Onboarding Process Lauren Brischke
  • 2. Agenda • Overview • Methodology • Results • Recommendations
  • 3. Project Overview Objective • Recommendations for improving the onboarding process for new RCTs • Creating a standardized process for bringing RCTs onto their assigned Living Units after CIP training Overview • Onboarding is an important part of overall retention strategy • Inconsistency in onboarding processes across living units leads to variation in RCTs experiences • Re-evaluating this process will help build a more structured approach
  • 4. The Revolving Door • “it’s like a revolving door—we are just making clones that come and go” • High turnover rates and vacancies for RCTs • Onboarding is one way to address new-hire turnover rates • Answers question “how can we keep the revolving door from spinning out of control?” 38% 16% 15% 11% 8% 5% 4% 3% Percentage of Employees RCT LPN/Other Nursing Medical Other Building/Maintenance Office/Administrative Food Services RCS Classification
  • 5. Methodology • Interviews • UD’s, RCS’s, and Job Coaches to learn about current process • Focus Groups –to gain opinions • New RCTs and preceptors • Survey • For New RCTs • Evaluated the impact of onboarding practices on comfort level • Literature Review • Research best practices from other leading organizations
  • 6. #1 Supporting Evidence: Key Result : Some living units currently apply some very positive onboarding practices. Best Practices Summary Table Table 1.3. Best Practices at CWC Summary Table Onboarding Activity Best Practice Pre- Transition Preparation  UD Introductions/ Unit descriptions in NEO  Exposed to living unit before transition in training Introduction  Meet UD on first day  Meet all team members Tour  Informal introductions during tour Unit-Based Training  exposed to each apartment/shift RCT Role & Expectations  Talk in depth with nurse, psych, etc.  review job expectations Socialization  Use a welcome board Preceptor Program  RCS collaborates with preceptor Evaluation/Monitoring  UD check in with new RCTs on daily rounds RCS, Job Coach, UD role  RCS works side by side with RCTs  job coaches check in in the first few weeks  UD participates in the process
  • 7. Survey Findings Correlation Analysis Best Practices correlate with confidence/knowledge levels in first week/first month • Opportunity to meet Senior leaders (.42) • Job coach there to answer questions (.58) • Unit-Based Training(.64)
  • 8. #1 Recommendation: Apply the best practices used by some units at the center to other units. Action Steps: (1)Include best practices in the new employee toolkit as part of checklist (2)Set reoccurring agenda item for a current meeting to share best practices, knowledge, experiences
  • 9. Key Result : There is no systematic, structured approach to onboarding across living units. #2 Supporting Evidence  Focus group theme: need increased consistency  Variation in terminology, perceptions of roles, and levels of involvement  Survey: Variation in information RCTs want more of “It’s not consistent center -wide—we want consistency.” 45% 45% 15% 25% 20% 20% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% PercentageofRCTs Topic Please indicate the topic(s) you would have liked more information about.
  • 10. Recommendation: Develop a comprehensive new employee toolkit that includes checklists and a written onboarding timeline. #2 Action Steps: 1. Create a new hire checklist for supervisors 2. Include a. Logistics information b. Specific onboarding timeline c. Roles & Responsibilities d. Key skills list EX: Consistency, teamwork, communication, helpful e. Advice EX: “Don’t rush or get overwhelmed “Observe how other RCTs react", "Carefully read DLP”, “Get to know people’s names fast” 3. Communicate to all members 4. Educate and train managers 5. Post resources electronically
  • 11. Key Result : New RCTs experience an information overload during the transition from CIP training to their assigned living unit. #3 Supporting Evidence: Focus Group theme: need more time “There is lots of information, will probably take me the whole summer to learn” “Already trying to retain a lot of information & DLP is not a small book” “An extra week of working with another RCT would allow more time to absorb information” “We need more time to get to know residents better” “Too much information”
  • 12. #3 Recommendation: Modify the time period RCTs have to learn unit-based information so it is longer and more participatory. Action Steps: (1) Create a realistic timeline (2) Increase hands-on experiences (3) Train employees on assigned unit (4) Remind information over time Pace delivery of onboarding information “it’s a marathon not a sprint” Assimilated Employee Onboarding Length Orientation Facilities Orientation Paperwork Company Handbook Company Policies Tour Cultural Mentor On-the-job Training Feedback Process
  • 13. Key Result : There is no consistent approach to personal welcoming from key people. #4 Supporting Evidence:  Survey data shows “I was introduced to my co-workers” received 87%  Focus group theme: variation in introductions 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% job coach was there tour of living unit my unit welcomed me introduced to my co-workers met with supervisor within week opportunity to meet leaders clear job duties and expectations resources I needed someone was assigned assigned person welcoming unit based training prepared me skills check-offs were used feedback on my performance % of Respondants OnboardingActivity Please answer to following according to your experience: Yes or No “They may act welcoming, but sometimes not that welcoming” “there were no introductions”
  • 14. #4 Recommendation: Speed the development of important working relationships for new RCTs. Action Steps: (1) Managers welcome new employees their first day (2) Provide framework for socialization in assimilation checklist (3) Identify key people for new RCT to meet (4) Include leadership profiles that include photos (5) Prepare RCTs and others for productive conversations a. clarify objectives of meetings b. provide list of talking points (6)Make formal and informal introductions (7) Invite new RCTs to key meetings (8) Conduct consistent check-ins with relationships Preparation -prepare checklist -set up meetings - brief bios, background Delivery - formal/informal introductions Follow-Through -check in consistently
  • 15. Key Result: There is an opportunity to improve the understanding of the preceptor role and responsibilities for both the new RCT and the RCT preceptor. #5 Supporting Evidence  Survey indicates RCTs want to learn more information about roles/expectations 45% 45% 15% 25% 20% 20% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% PercentageofRespondants Topic Please indicate the topic(s) you would have liked more information about.
  • 16. • Focus group comments o “It was kind of scary; I was new and training right away and it was different” o “RCTs look at it like an ‘easy day’ or ‘rest day’” • Survey: preceptor contributes most to onboarding experience 52% 13% 48% 30% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Preceptor Introductions Unit-Based Training Feedback Other PercentageofResponses Onboarding Activity Which activity contributed the most to your experience starting to work on the unit?
  • 17. Recommendation: Create a more structured preceptor program. #5 Action Steps: (1) Recruit voluntary preceptors (2) Educate preceptors about role and responsibilities (3) Have consistent preceptors (4) Develop and communicate clear expectations (5) Preceptors collaborate with the RCS (6) Preceptor and new RCT should remain together (7) Increase recognition (8) Monitor Preceptor Performance
  • 18. Key Result: There is no consistent process owner(s) for the onboarding program that integrates the activities of stakeholders or holds them accountable. #6 Supporting Evidence: No consistent ownership of specific activities “most of the time this person does it” or “when I am here this is what happens-but I don’t know about when I’m not here” Interview “there is no point person for the whole process—who is going to help them when they get onto the unit?” Variation in levels of responsibility associated with roles EX: job coaches providing reminders to a “variety of roles including coach, parent and others”
  • 19. Recommendation: Increase accountability for the onboarding process by establishing an owner of the whole process and defining who controls various steps. #6 Action Steps: (1) Identify a process leader (2) document key roles, responsibilities (3) Increase leadership involvement Survey: largest correlation for confidence in first week is “the opportunity to meet senior leaders”
  • 20. Key Result: There is an opportunity for better preparing new RCTs for working with individuals at CWC. #7 Supporting Evidence: Survey responses: • Unit-Based training on all apartments • Train in assigned living unit • Increase interaction with residents in assigned building Focus group themes Transition is overwhelming “Hectic, shocked, never knew a G-tube existed” “Stressful and felt rushed, behind and frustrated” “There was a lot of frustration, just kind of thrown out there” Training isn’t realistic “Once on the units it was different than the way to pass certification” “Should train on each apartment evenly so you get comfortable going to all apartments” “If you work the way they teach you, you won’t get anything done—especially bathing”
  • 21. #7 Action Steps: (1) Have workforce SMT develop a multidisciplinary team including leadership, Unit Directors, and other relevant employees (2) Identify content areas to include in Unit-Based Training • Active Treatment • Remind of NEO content • Emphasize CWC guidelines and policies  how to get acclimated and how its different than CIP training (3) Evaluate variables such as: • time requirements of new RCTs • how consistent training can be made across units (4) Develop an improvement plan to modify Unit-Based Training Recommendation: Expand Unit-Based training to better prepare new RCTs for working with individuals at CWC.
  • 22. Key Result : There is not a performance evaluation system for the onboarding process. #8 NEO evaluations but no follow-up after NEO No measures of the long-term impact of onboarding activities Recommendation: : Seek further feedback on onboarding program from new employees Action Steps: (1)Identify Process measures (were they introduced, was a checklist used) (2) Identify Results/outcome measures (reduced turnover, increased retention/confidence) (3)Monitor onboarding program effectiveness over time
  • 23. Key Takeaways & Guiding Principles Importance of applying best practices Increase accountability Increase consistency Support implementation Everything Matters: bring greater attention to each and every aspect of onboarding process Little things make a big difference Checklist, introducing yourself
  • 24. Any Questions or Comments?