SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Volume 161, No. 79
Copyright © 2015 Law Bulletin Publishing Company. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission from Law Bulletin Publishing Company.
CHICAGOLAWBULLETIN.COM THURSDAY, APRIL 23, 2015
®
Five tips for hiring
environmental consultants
I
n my practice as an environ-
mental lawyer, I often retain
consultants to perform Phase
I environmental site assess-
ments as well as Phase II
investigations, environmental
compliance audits and remedial
activities. However, there are
many small deals where the eco-
nomics may not support involving
an environmental attorney, at
least at the initial stages.
In these cases, the real estate
or corporate lawyer quarterback-
ing the deal may be called upon to
engage an environmental consul-
tant. For those who do not have
the benefit of the experience that
comes with hiring environmental
consultants every day, these five
tips may prove invaluable.
Tip #1: Build a stable
Over time, it’s best to actively
build relationships with a number
of different environmental consul-
tants whom you can trust to han-
dle an engagement efficiently and
effectively (depending on criteria
such as the scope of the inves-
tigation, the complexity and the
timing).
For example, small, local envi-
ronmental assessments or relative-
ly simple remediation projects
(such as most underground storage
tank removals) might be best per-
formed by a smaller regional con-
sulting shop. Conversely, assess-
ments of large national (or even
international) real estate portfolios,
or tackling known complex envi-
ronmental problems, typically re-
quires a large consulting firm with
worldwide offices and a high level
of expertise and capabilities.
While the Internet can be a
useful source of basic background
information (for example, to see if
a consultant performs Phase I
ESAs, or if the consultant has an
office close to the subject prop-
erty), personal recommendations
from other attorneys in your firm,
or others with whom you have a
professional relationship, or even
members of the environmental
section of the local bar association
often provide the best way to
match an appropriate consultant
with your particular need.
Tip #2: Confirm the scope in
writing
Before beginning work, most
consultants will provide a propos-
al specifying the exact work to be
performed (and the type of fee
involved, as discussed later). Pay
close attention to the description
of the work to make sure that it
covers what was discussed and
that the scope is appropriate to
the project.
First, a proposal for a Phase I
ESA should specify compliance
with the ASTM Practice E1527-13
(the “rule book” for performing
Phase I ESAs) to achieve “All Ap-
propriate Inquiry” under 40 CFR
Section 312.
Be aware that under the ASTM
standard, several fairly common
environmental issues such as as-
bestos, wetlands, mold and endan-
gered species are considered
“non-scope” items, but they can
be included in the Phase I at an
extra charge. Thus, the attorney
with his or her client must decide
which, if any, of these add-ons
makes sense for the deal.
Other common add-ons include
but are not limited to the disposal
of investigation-derived waste
(IDW) that is generated in the
course of invasive Phase II sam-
pling of soil or groundwater.
If provision for IDW is not
made in the proposal, the con-
sultant may simply drum such
waste and leave it on site for the
owner to deal with — which can
be especially problematic if your
client is not the owner of the
property being investigated or
does not have independent dis-
posal arrangements in place.
Tip #3: Understand the fees
The consultant’s proposal will
specify the fee structure for the
work, but such terms can be con-
fusing. Commonly, the quote will
only be an estimate, not a fixed
amount. Typically, fixed-fee ar-
rangements or not-to-exceed costs
must be specifically negotiated.
In some cases, remedial work
may be reimbursable from state
funds such as underground stor-
age tank or dry cleaning reme-
diation funds. Many consultants
will be reluctant to perform work
contingent on reimbursement
from the state, but if such an ar-
rangement is agreed to, that
should be spelled out in the pro-
posal.
Tip #4: Beware the terms and
conditions
Most proposals will include a
set of lengthy terms and condi-
tions — often as an attachment —
which you may be tempted to
overlook as boilerplate. However,
critical provisions such as liability
limitations are often hidden within
the T&C.
Often, the T&C limits the con-
sultant’s professional liability to
the greater (or lesser) of a nom-
inal amount such as $5,000, or the
value of the contract. Such lia-
bility limitations have been upheld
by courts, and these limitations
provide little relief in the case of
serious consultant malpractice.
While most consultants will not
agree to unlimited contractual li-
ability, many will agree to a lim-
itation based on the amount of the
consultant’s professional liability
insurance, which usually is at
least $1 million (and which can be
specified in the T&C).
Other potential traps may be ad-
ministrative markups for lab fees
and similar subcontractor work
(sometimes 15 percent or more);
these often can be negotiated
down or removed altogether.
Tip #5: Call your lender first
If your client is purchasing
property or business assets using
conventional financing, be aware
that lenders not only typically re-
quire a Phase I to be performed
but also may require certain non-
scope additions like checking for
asbestos, lead-based paint and so
forth. The lender may have a list
of approved consultants from
which the client must choose.
On the other hand, for smaller
deals, some lenders allow for
“transaction screens” or other
limited investigations that may
save money over a Phase I. Either
way, it’s best to look into your
lender’s requirements before com-
missioning the Phase I.
In conclusion, while a good en-
vironmental attorney can help
navigate the issues that arise even
at the initial stage of engaging an
environmental consultant for a
project, these tips should be use-
ful if you must go it alone for one
reason or another.
BY LAWRENCE W.
FALBE
Pay close attention to the description of the work
to make sure that it covers what was discussed
and that the scope is appropriate to the project.

More Related Content

Similar to 17952 LB reprint Miller Apr23-2015

13 0813 webinar q & a legal environment, issues and risk
13 0813  webinar q & a  legal environment, issues and risk13 0813  webinar q & a  legal environment, issues and risk
13 0813 webinar q & a legal environment, issues and risk
CleantechOpen
 
Broker Reveals All
Broker Reveals AllBroker Reveals All
Broker Reveals All
brianwoolsey
 
Property Insurance Claims
Property Insurance ClaimsProperty Insurance Claims
Property Insurance Claims
Robin Frey
 

Similar to 17952 LB reprint Miller Apr23-2015 (20)

AICPA MS - Article MKS2016
AICPA MS - Article MKS2016AICPA MS - Article MKS2016
AICPA MS - Article MKS2016
 
Adviser solicitor introducer relationships
Adviser solicitor introducer relationshipsAdviser solicitor introducer relationships
Adviser solicitor introducer relationships
 
13 0813 webinar q & a legal environment, issues and risk
13 0813  webinar q & a  legal environment, issues and risk13 0813  webinar q & a  legal environment, issues and risk
13 0813 webinar q & a legal environment, issues and risk
 
Retirement Plan Update
Retirement Plan UpdateRetirement Plan Update
Retirement Plan Update
 
Sales Agreements for Startups
Sales Agreements for StartupsSales Agreements for Startups
Sales Agreements for Startups
 
Fenwick SHP0412
Fenwick SHP0412Fenwick SHP0412
Fenwick SHP0412
 
Negotiating Retainage
Negotiating Retainage Negotiating Retainage
Negotiating Retainage
 
Resolving Shareholder Disputes (Series: Complex Financial Litigation 2020)
Resolving Shareholder Disputes (Series: Complex Financial Litigation 2020)   Resolving Shareholder Disputes (Series: Complex Financial Litigation 2020)
Resolving Shareholder Disputes (Series: Complex Financial Litigation 2020)
 
Resolving Shareholder Disputes
Resolving Shareholder DisputesResolving Shareholder Disputes
Resolving Shareholder Disputes
 
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
Basic Contract Law for PMs webinar Part 3: What to do when things go wrong or...
 
Break these rules and you will be a frequent failure
Break these rules and you will be a frequent failureBreak these rules and you will be a frequent failure
Break these rules and you will be a frequent failure
 
Cm managing contract_problems
Cm managing contract_problemsCm managing contract_problems
Cm managing contract_problems
 
Legal Office Contracts KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CONTRACTS
Legal Office  Contracts KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CONTRACTSLegal Office  Contracts KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CONTRACTS
Legal Office Contracts KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CONTRACTS
 
Haberlen and Pollard
Haberlen and PollardHaberlen and Pollard
Haberlen and Pollard
 
Broker Reveals All
Broker Reveals AllBroker Reveals All
Broker Reveals All
 
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
 
Negotiating Clinical Research Budgets: Most Commonly Neglected Items
Negotiating Clinical Research Budgets: Most Commonly Neglected ItemsNegotiating Clinical Research Budgets: Most Commonly Neglected Items
Negotiating Clinical Research Budgets: Most Commonly Neglected Items
 
Property Insurance Claims
Property Insurance ClaimsProperty Insurance Claims
Property Insurance Claims
 
OUTSTANDING OUTSOURCING - Checklist
OUTSTANDING OUTSOURCING - ChecklistOUTSTANDING OUTSOURCING - Checklist
OUTSTANDING OUTSOURCING - Checklist
 
Outsourcing checklist1
Outsourcing checklist1Outsourcing checklist1
Outsourcing checklist1
 

17952 LB reprint Miller Apr23-2015

  • 1. Volume 161, No. 79 Copyright © 2015 Law Bulletin Publishing Company. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission from Law Bulletin Publishing Company. CHICAGOLAWBULLETIN.COM THURSDAY, APRIL 23, 2015 ® Five tips for hiring environmental consultants I n my practice as an environ- mental lawyer, I often retain consultants to perform Phase I environmental site assess- ments as well as Phase II investigations, environmental compliance audits and remedial activities. However, there are many small deals where the eco- nomics may not support involving an environmental attorney, at least at the initial stages. In these cases, the real estate or corporate lawyer quarterback- ing the deal may be called upon to engage an environmental consul- tant. For those who do not have the benefit of the experience that comes with hiring environmental consultants every day, these five tips may prove invaluable. Tip #1: Build a stable Over time, it’s best to actively build relationships with a number of different environmental consul- tants whom you can trust to han- dle an engagement efficiently and effectively (depending on criteria such as the scope of the inves- tigation, the complexity and the timing). For example, small, local envi- ronmental assessments or relative- ly simple remediation projects (such as most underground storage tank removals) might be best per- formed by a smaller regional con- sulting shop. Conversely, assess- ments of large national (or even international) real estate portfolios, or tackling known complex envi- ronmental problems, typically re- quires a large consulting firm with worldwide offices and a high level of expertise and capabilities. While the Internet can be a useful source of basic background information (for example, to see if a consultant performs Phase I ESAs, or if the consultant has an office close to the subject prop- erty), personal recommendations from other attorneys in your firm, or others with whom you have a professional relationship, or even members of the environmental section of the local bar association often provide the best way to match an appropriate consultant with your particular need. Tip #2: Confirm the scope in writing Before beginning work, most consultants will provide a propos- al specifying the exact work to be performed (and the type of fee involved, as discussed later). Pay close attention to the description of the work to make sure that it covers what was discussed and that the scope is appropriate to the project. First, a proposal for a Phase I ESA should specify compliance with the ASTM Practice E1527-13 (the “rule book” for performing Phase I ESAs) to achieve “All Ap- propriate Inquiry” under 40 CFR Section 312. Be aware that under the ASTM standard, several fairly common environmental issues such as as- bestos, wetlands, mold and endan- gered species are considered “non-scope” items, but they can be included in the Phase I at an extra charge. Thus, the attorney with his or her client must decide which, if any, of these add-ons makes sense for the deal. Other common add-ons include but are not limited to the disposal of investigation-derived waste (IDW) that is generated in the course of invasive Phase II sam- pling of soil or groundwater. If provision for IDW is not made in the proposal, the con- sultant may simply drum such waste and leave it on site for the owner to deal with — which can be especially problematic if your client is not the owner of the property being investigated or does not have independent dis- posal arrangements in place. Tip #3: Understand the fees The consultant’s proposal will specify the fee structure for the work, but such terms can be con- fusing. Commonly, the quote will only be an estimate, not a fixed amount. Typically, fixed-fee ar- rangements or not-to-exceed costs must be specifically negotiated. In some cases, remedial work may be reimbursable from state funds such as underground stor- age tank or dry cleaning reme- diation funds. Many consultants will be reluctant to perform work contingent on reimbursement from the state, but if such an ar- rangement is agreed to, that should be spelled out in the pro- posal. Tip #4: Beware the terms and conditions Most proposals will include a set of lengthy terms and condi- tions — often as an attachment — which you may be tempted to overlook as boilerplate. However, critical provisions such as liability limitations are often hidden within the T&C. Often, the T&C limits the con- sultant’s professional liability to the greater (or lesser) of a nom- inal amount such as $5,000, or the value of the contract. Such lia- bility limitations have been upheld by courts, and these limitations provide little relief in the case of serious consultant malpractice. While most consultants will not agree to unlimited contractual li- ability, many will agree to a lim- itation based on the amount of the consultant’s professional liability insurance, which usually is at least $1 million (and which can be specified in the T&C). Other potential traps may be ad- ministrative markups for lab fees and similar subcontractor work (sometimes 15 percent or more); these often can be negotiated down or removed altogether. Tip #5: Call your lender first If your client is purchasing property or business assets using conventional financing, be aware that lenders not only typically re- quire a Phase I to be performed but also may require certain non- scope additions like checking for asbestos, lead-based paint and so forth. The lender may have a list of approved consultants from which the client must choose. On the other hand, for smaller deals, some lenders allow for “transaction screens” or other limited investigations that may save money over a Phase I. Either way, it’s best to look into your lender’s requirements before com- missioning the Phase I. In conclusion, while a good en- vironmental attorney can help navigate the issues that arise even at the initial stage of engaging an environmental consultant for a project, these tips should be use- ful if you must go it alone for one reason or another. BY LAWRENCE W. FALBE Pay close attention to the description of the work to make sure that it covers what was discussed and that the scope is appropriate to the project.