SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
INSTRUCTIONAL WALK-
THROUGHS
An overview of the protocol, and applications to
leadership work.
Kim M. Bennett, Northside Consulting for CREC
4/12/2016 Administrative Council, USD #1
WHAT ARE INSTRUCTIONAL
WALKTHROUGHS?
Definitions and Characteristics
Bennett, 2016
PURPOSE OF AN INSTRUCTIONAL
WALKTHROUGH
 Reinforce attention to instructional practices
 Gather data about instructional practices and student learning
 Stimulate collegial conversation about teaching and learning
 Learn from other participants
 Deepen understandings and improve practices through continuous
feedback
National Staff Development Council, http://www.nsdc.org/
INSTRUCTIONAL
WALKTHROUGH,
DEFINED
Focused
Organized
Frequent
~ an organized observation that
requires the principal or supervisor to
frequently visit classrooms to look for
specific instructional practices.
Fink, E & Resnick, L. (2001). Developing principals as instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan 82(2) 598-607
OTHER ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS
 Include reflection and debrief (in various forms)
 Focused on curriculum and instruction (NOT supervision and
evaluation)
 Feedback to staff is in aggregate, and used as springboard for
professional development
 Follow up is full-staff (not individual teacher)
Bennett, 2016
ESTABLISHING A FOCUS FOR
INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGHS
Example: Student Engagement
Bennett, 2016
SOME TIPS FOR CHOOSING A FOCUS
 Alignment: What is the focus for our district/school improvement plan?
 Emergent Need: What focus appears to be “on time” for our
building/district right now?
 Essential: What focus, if addressed right now, would resolve several
other issues?
 Capacity: What focus do we have the best ability to address with current
resources (staff, time, funding, materials…)?
 Impact: What focus, if addressed, would effect the most change?
Bennett, 2016
WHY STUDENT ENGAGEMENT?
 Assumption #1: Student engagement is
a “barometer” for a host of other
curricular and instructional issues.
 Assumption #2: Non-educational
outcomes (attendance, behavior, post-
secondary success…) are better for
students who are engaged in lifelong
learning habits.
Bennett, 2016
FOUR (SECRET) KEYS TO STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
Jackson, R.; and A. Zmuda. 2014. Four (Secret) Keys to Student Engagement. Educational Leadership, September 2014: 19-24.
ORGANIZING A WALKTHROUGH ~ ONE
PROTOCOL
Manson Youth Institution, 2015-16
Bennett, 2016
SUGGESTED 2-HR PROTOCOL
 30 minutes: review protocol norms, review indicators for selected focus,
establish observation teams and schedule for visits.
 60 minutes: 20 minute observations x 3 classrooms: teams visit
classrooms and observe for selected focus
 30 minutes: debrief as a group and develop action plan
Bennett, 2016
Key to
Engagement Student Teacher
Clarity
What am I aiming for?
I can see how the pieces fit together.
I can see the logic of what I’m being asked to
do.
I can track my progress over time on a goal.
What am I asking students to do?
Provide clear goals and structures for each
task.
Explain the key steps and give examples.
Show students what success will look like.
Evidence:
Quantitative: # of times observed
Qualitative: description, what you observed
Evidence:
Quantitative: # of times observed
Qualitative: description, what you observed
SCHEDULING INSTRUCTIONAL
WALKTHROUGHS
Considerations and Tips
Bennett, 2016
TIME FACTORS TO CONSIDER
 Team: Who will be on the observation team? What time constraints do
they have?
 Staff: Whose classrooms will be observed? What are their scheduling
needs?
 Focus: What is the focus? Do we want several observations close
together or a longer, ongoing routine?
 Plan: What is our ultimate goal for this professional opportunity? Is
there a “timeliness” to this goal?
Bennett, 2016
SELECTED USES FOR INSTRUCTIONAL
WALKTHROUGHS
Purpose Team Scheduling
To plan building PD focus
for the year
Administrator, support
services reps, teacher
rep(s) or coaches
Several walkthroughs
close together early in
year; quarterly follow up
walkthroughs to monitor
action plan
To calibrate among
building administrators
for supervision &
evaluation
Building administrative
team
Monthly walkthroughs,
focus selected based on
administrator needs
To monitor a district-wide
focus
Administrators from
around the district
Monthly walkthroughs –
different host school,
admins opt in from month
to month
Bennett, 2016
EX: PLANNING BUILDING PD
 Building team conducts several walkthroughs in September and October,
and discovers that instructional time is lost at the beginning of class as
student arrive.
 Aggregate data are presented at staff meeting, where several strategies are
discussed for getting students engaged in meaningful tasks upon arrival.
Plan is developed to implement 2 strategies building-wide.
 Staff meeting time is dedicated to learning more about anchor activities
and warm-ups.
 Team conducts follow up walkthroughs to monitor implementation of
selected strategies and shares results at staff meetings.
Bennett, 2016
EX: ADMINISTRATOR CALIBRATION
 A building has several new administrators, or an administrator who is new
to the building. They want to ensure that they are evaluating teachers
equitably during supervision and evaluation.
 The administrative team chooses a focus that might be subjective (e.g.,
professionalism), and researches indicators of teachers professionalism.
 Monthly walkthroughs are conducted to look for evidence of
professionalism and debrief to ensure calibration of observations, and
specific language that can be used to provide feedback to teachers during
conferences.
 Focus remains on professional development of the leadership team, not on
teacher evaluation.
Bennett, 2016
EX: INSTRUCTIONAL ROUNDS (DISTRICT
FOCUS)
 A large district is trying to establish coherence among the buildings within
the district regarding a district focus (e.g., development of a system for
addressing student behavior).
 A building administrator volunteers to “host” a walkthrough at a school as a
“lab” for studying this focus.
 An observation team convenes based on “opt in” of administrators across
the district.
 Data are collected during the walkthrough, and shared with the host and
the district administrative team. Action items are developed as needed.
 Host schools and observation teams change monthly.
Bennett, 2016
DEBRIEF, REFLECTION AND FEEDBACK
Special considerations
Bennett, 2016
DEBRIEFING
 Take your time: this is essential to the process
 Stay focused on the focus!
 Use strengths-based language(talk about what WAS)
 Keep it anonymous - “Classroom 1,” not “Mr. Johnson”
 Discuss aggregate data
 Debrief only as a team (not during the observations)
Bennett, 2016
FEEDBACK CONSIDERATIONS
Host teachers Whole staff Outside groups
Do… • Thank teachers
after
• Share the “best
of” in an email
• Keep comments
aggregate
• Post concerns
as questions
• Share aggregate
data with staff
• Ask for staff
reflection on the
results
• Formulate an
action plan as a
staff
• Ask yourself if
this is
something that
needs to be
shared
• Consult experts
in the focus area
as needed
Don’t… • Confuse process
with S&E
• Have formal
conferences
• Share negatives
• Interpret the
data for staff
• Use results to
beat up staff
• Keep staff in the
dark
• Make staff feel
uncomfortable
Bennett, 2016
OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION
 Central Office has email templates
 See suggested timetable for walkthroughs for guidance on scheduling
 Contact Kim Holley if you would like to participate in this process
Bennett, 2016

More Related Content

What's hot

Curriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic Definitions
Curriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic DefinitionsCurriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic Definitions
Curriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic DefinitionsDr. Suad Alazzam
 
Mapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and Schools
Mapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and SchoolsMapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and Schools
Mapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and SchoolsGlenn Wiebe
 
Curriculum development
Curriculum developmentCurriculum development
Curriculum developmentEga Gusnika
 
Learning and assessment
Learning and assessmentLearning and assessment
Learning and assessmentsitamajhi1
 
Achieving constructive alignment
Achieving constructive alignmentAchieving constructive alignment
Achieving constructive alignmentRichard Oelmann
 
Curriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluationCurriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluationbibashenry
 
Cas, presentation note
Cas, presentation noteCas, presentation note
Cas, presentation noteSunil Mallick
 
Curriculum mapping-train-the-trainer
Curriculum mapping-train-the-trainerCurriculum mapping-train-the-trainer
Curriculum mapping-train-the-trainerahmedabbas1121
 
Curriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluationCurriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluationPunam Thakur
 
Types of assessment
Types of assessmentTypes of assessment
Types of assessmentavacara1969
 
learning indicator n learning outcomes
learning indicator n learning outcomeslearning indicator n learning outcomes
learning indicator n learning outcomesJagadish Kumar Gupta
 
Importance of evaluation
Importance of evaluationImportance of evaluation
Importance of evaluationJhunisa Agustin
 
Characteristics of outcomes based assessment
Characteristics of outcomes based assessmentCharacteristics of outcomes based assessment
Characteristics of outcomes based assessmentWilliam Kapambwe
 

What's hot (20)

Curriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic Definitions
Curriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic DefinitionsCurriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic Definitions
Curriculum Mapping & Analysis: Basic Definitions
 
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
Introduction to Curriculum MappingIntroduction to Curriculum Mapping
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
 
ppt
ppt ppt
ppt
 
Mapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and Schools
Mapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and SchoolsMapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and Schools
Mapping the Big Picture: Curriculum Mapping and Schools
 
Curriculum development
Curriculum developmentCurriculum development
Curriculum development
 
Learning and assessment
Learning and assessmentLearning and assessment
Learning and assessment
 
Achieving constructive alignment
Achieving constructive alignmentAchieving constructive alignment
Achieving constructive alignment
 
Curriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluationCurriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluation
 
Cas, presentation note
Cas, presentation noteCas, presentation note
Cas, presentation note
 
MONITORING THE CURRICULUM
MONITORING THE CURRICULUMMONITORING THE CURRICULUM
MONITORING THE CURRICULUM
 
Curriculum mapping-train-the-trainer
Curriculum mapping-train-the-trainerCurriculum mapping-train-the-trainer
Curriculum mapping-train-the-trainer
 
Resume - Long
Resume - LongResume - Long
Resume - Long
 
lesson planning
lesson planninglesson planning
lesson planning
 
Curriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluationCurriculum evaluation
Curriculum evaluation
 
Viewpoints Pitch
Viewpoints PitchViewpoints Pitch
Viewpoints Pitch
 
Curriculum evaluation (1)
Curriculum evaluation (1)Curriculum evaluation (1)
Curriculum evaluation (1)
 
Types of assessment
Types of assessmentTypes of assessment
Types of assessment
 
learning indicator n learning outcomes
learning indicator n learning outcomeslearning indicator n learning outcomes
learning indicator n learning outcomes
 
Importance of evaluation
Importance of evaluationImportance of evaluation
Importance of evaluation
 
Characteristics of outcomes based assessment
Characteristics of outcomes based assessmentCharacteristics of outcomes based assessment
Characteristics of outcomes based assessment
 

Similar to Instructional Walk-throughs 4-12

Re-Design for the PID Program
Re-Design for the PID ProgramRe-Design for the PID Program
Re-Design for the PID ProgramKaren
 
Successful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory Teacher
Successful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory TeacherSuccessful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory Teacher
Successful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory TeacherRichard Voltz
 
Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12
Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12
Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12Keith Eades
 
Phases of Administering the Curriculum
Phases of Administering the CurriculumPhases of Administering the Curriculum
Phases of Administering the CurriculumSharon Geroquia
 
Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...
Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...
Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...eaquals
 
R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012
R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012
R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012tzoubir
 
[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...
[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...
[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...LearningandTeaching
 
Sped and inclusive education action plan
Sped and inclusive education action planSped and inclusive education action plan
Sped and inclusive education action planRainielVicCrisologo
 
Curriculum Leadership Course 2009 Overview
Curriculum Leadership Course 2009 OverviewCurriculum Leadership Course 2009 Overview
Curriculum Leadership Course 2009 Overviewdbrady3702
 
Planningforsuccess workshop
Planningforsuccess workshopPlanningforsuccess workshop
Planningforsuccess workshoplbcbviu
 
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptx
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptxSelf Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptx
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptxjoyce506088
 
Achievement & accountability action team
Achievement & accountability action teamAchievement & accountability action team
Achievement & accountability action teamdezo7376
 
Effective lesson planning
Effective lesson planningEffective lesson planning
Effective lesson planningHazel Joy Chong
 

Similar to Instructional Walk-throughs 4-12 (20)

SEED observations
SEED observationsSEED observations
SEED observations
 
Re-Design for the PID Program
Re-Design for the PID ProgramRe-Design for the PID Program
Re-Design for the PID Program
 
NC Teacher Evaluation
NC Teacher EvaluationNC Teacher Evaluation
NC Teacher Evaluation
 
Successful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory Teacher
Successful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory TeacherSuccessful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory Teacher
Successful Remediation of the Unsatisfactory Teacher
 
Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12
Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12
Changing the Lens on Teaching and Learning 11-14-12
 
Phases of Administering the Curriculum
Phases of Administering the CurriculumPhases of Administering the Curriculum
Phases of Administering the Curriculum
 
Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...
Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...
Silvana Richardson: Impactful professional learning for teachers – from input...
 
Formative assessment
Formative assessmentFormative assessment
Formative assessment
 
Assessment & Feedback Reflective Tool
Assessment & Feedback Reflective ToolAssessment & Feedback Reflective Tool
Assessment & Feedback Reflective Tool
 
R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012
R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012
R poole presentation sat 11 feb 2012
 
The Master Educato Role
The Master Educato RoleThe Master Educato Role
The Master Educato Role
 
[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...
[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...
[Re]evaluating practice: measuring what is important, to inform improvements ...
 
Action plan
Action planAction plan
Action plan
 
Sped and inclusive education action plan
Sped and inclusive education action planSped and inclusive education action plan
Sped and inclusive education action plan
 
Curriculum Leadership Course 2009 Overview
Curriculum Leadership Course 2009 OverviewCurriculum Leadership Course 2009 Overview
Curriculum Leadership Course 2009 Overview
 
Planningforsuccess workshop
Planningforsuccess workshopPlanningforsuccess workshop
Planningforsuccess workshop
 
Deliberate Practice Growth Targets
Deliberate Practice Growth TargetsDeliberate Practice Growth Targets
Deliberate Practice Growth Targets
 
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptx
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptxSelf Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptx
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Planning.pptx
 
Achievement & accountability action team
Achievement & accountability action teamAchievement & accountability action team
Achievement & accountability action team
 
Effective lesson planning
Effective lesson planningEffective lesson planning
Effective lesson planning
 

Instructional Walk-throughs 4-12

  • 1. INSTRUCTIONAL WALK- THROUGHS An overview of the protocol, and applications to leadership work. Kim M. Bennett, Northside Consulting for CREC 4/12/2016 Administrative Council, USD #1
  • 2. WHAT ARE INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGHS? Definitions and Characteristics Bennett, 2016
  • 3. PURPOSE OF AN INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGH  Reinforce attention to instructional practices  Gather data about instructional practices and student learning  Stimulate collegial conversation about teaching and learning  Learn from other participants  Deepen understandings and improve practices through continuous feedback National Staff Development Council, http://www.nsdc.org/
  • 4. INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGH, DEFINED Focused Organized Frequent ~ an organized observation that requires the principal or supervisor to frequently visit classrooms to look for specific instructional practices. Fink, E & Resnick, L. (2001). Developing principals as instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan 82(2) 598-607
  • 5. OTHER ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS  Include reflection and debrief (in various forms)  Focused on curriculum and instruction (NOT supervision and evaluation)  Feedback to staff is in aggregate, and used as springboard for professional development  Follow up is full-staff (not individual teacher) Bennett, 2016
  • 6. ESTABLISHING A FOCUS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGHS Example: Student Engagement Bennett, 2016
  • 7. SOME TIPS FOR CHOOSING A FOCUS  Alignment: What is the focus for our district/school improvement plan?  Emergent Need: What focus appears to be “on time” for our building/district right now?  Essential: What focus, if addressed right now, would resolve several other issues?  Capacity: What focus do we have the best ability to address with current resources (staff, time, funding, materials…)?  Impact: What focus, if addressed, would effect the most change? Bennett, 2016
  • 8. WHY STUDENT ENGAGEMENT?  Assumption #1: Student engagement is a “barometer” for a host of other curricular and instructional issues.  Assumption #2: Non-educational outcomes (attendance, behavior, post- secondary success…) are better for students who are engaged in lifelong learning habits. Bennett, 2016
  • 9. FOUR (SECRET) KEYS TO STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Jackson, R.; and A. Zmuda. 2014. Four (Secret) Keys to Student Engagement. Educational Leadership, September 2014: 19-24.
  • 10. ORGANIZING A WALKTHROUGH ~ ONE PROTOCOL Manson Youth Institution, 2015-16 Bennett, 2016
  • 11. SUGGESTED 2-HR PROTOCOL  30 minutes: review protocol norms, review indicators for selected focus, establish observation teams and schedule for visits.  60 minutes: 20 minute observations x 3 classrooms: teams visit classrooms and observe for selected focus  30 minutes: debrief as a group and develop action plan Bennett, 2016
  • 12. Key to Engagement Student Teacher Clarity What am I aiming for? I can see how the pieces fit together. I can see the logic of what I’m being asked to do. I can track my progress over time on a goal. What am I asking students to do? Provide clear goals and structures for each task. Explain the key steps and give examples. Show students what success will look like. Evidence: Quantitative: # of times observed Qualitative: description, what you observed Evidence: Quantitative: # of times observed Qualitative: description, what you observed
  • 14. TIME FACTORS TO CONSIDER  Team: Who will be on the observation team? What time constraints do they have?  Staff: Whose classrooms will be observed? What are their scheduling needs?  Focus: What is the focus? Do we want several observations close together or a longer, ongoing routine?  Plan: What is our ultimate goal for this professional opportunity? Is there a “timeliness” to this goal? Bennett, 2016
  • 15. SELECTED USES FOR INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGHS Purpose Team Scheduling To plan building PD focus for the year Administrator, support services reps, teacher rep(s) or coaches Several walkthroughs close together early in year; quarterly follow up walkthroughs to monitor action plan To calibrate among building administrators for supervision & evaluation Building administrative team Monthly walkthroughs, focus selected based on administrator needs To monitor a district-wide focus Administrators from around the district Monthly walkthroughs – different host school, admins opt in from month to month Bennett, 2016
  • 16. EX: PLANNING BUILDING PD  Building team conducts several walkthroughs in September and October, and discovers that instructional time is lost at the beginning of class as student arrive.  Aggregate data are presented at staff meeting, where several strategies are discussed for getting students engaged in meaningful tasks upon arrival. Plan is developed to implement 2 strategies building-wide.  Staff meeting time is dedicated to learning more about anchor activities and warm-ups.  Team conducts follow up walkthroughs to monitor implementation of selected strategies and shares results at staff meetings. Bennett, 2016
  • 17. EX: ADMINISTRATOR CALIBRATION  A building has several new administrators, or an administrator who is new to the building. They want to ensure that they are evaluating teachers equitably during supervision and evaluation.  The administrative team chooses a focus that might be subjective (e.g., professionalism), and researches indicators of teachers professionalism.  Monthly walkthroughs are conducted to look for evidence of professionalism and debrief to ensure calibration of observations, and specific language that can be used to provide feedback to teachers during conferences.  Focus remains on professional development of the leadership team, not on teacher evaluation. Bennett, 2016
  • 18. EX: INSTRUCTIONAL ROUNDS (DISTRICT FOCUS)  A large district is trying to establish coherence among the buildings within the district regarding a district focus (e.g., development of a system for addressing student behavior).  A building administrator volunteers to “host” a walkthrough at a school as a “lab” for studying this focus.  An observation team convenes based on “opt in” of administrators across the district.  Data are collected during the walkthrough, and shared with the host and the district administrative team. Action items are developed as needed.  Host schools and observation teams change monthly. Bennett, 2016
  • 19. DEBRIEF, REFLECTION AND FEEDBACK Special considerations Bennett, 2016
  • 20. DEBRIEFING  Take your time: this is essential to the process  Stay focused on the focus!  Use strengths-based language(talk about what WAS)  Keep it anonymous - “Classroom 1,” not “Mr. Johnson”  Discuss aggregate data  Debrief only as a team (not during the observations) Bennett, 2016
  • 21. FEEDBACK CONSIDERATIONS Host teachers Whole staff Outside groups Do… • Thank teachers after • Share the “best of” in an email • Keep comments aggregate • Post concerns as questions • Share aggregate data with staff • Ask for staff reflection on the results • Formulate an action plan as a staff • Ask yourself if this is something that needs to be shared • Consult experts in the focus area as needed Don’t… • Confuse process with S&E • Have formal conferences • Share negatives • Interpret the data for staff • Use results to beat up staff • Keep staff in the dark • Make staff feel uncomfortable Bennett, 2016
  • 22. OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION  Central Office has email templates  See suggested timetable for walkthroughs for guidance on scheduling  Contact Kim Holley if you would like to participate in this process Bennett, 2016