SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Coll-iberalism Welfare<br />There are two general types of ideologies depicted in the two sources provided. These ideologies are collectivist ideas for Source I and individualist ideas for Source II. In Source I, the ideas that make the source portray collectivist views come from Mary Anulik Kutsiq’s (author of the source) explanation of the Inuit community, which involved the people looking out for the collective interest by sharing necessities of everyday life with one another. She then goes on to explain that people in general today are too much involved with a classical sense of liberalism, which is to say that we as individual people hold self-interest and competition higher than the collective interest and collective responsibility.  In Source II, the ideas that make the source portray individualist views come from the way the man talks to the bear and the man explains that in his day bears worked for their honey, instead of begging for it on the street. The man’s statement is an example of classical liberalism because the idea behind it was to work and compete against one another to earn your keep, rather than one’s earnings being handed to them by the government. <br />  The way the two sources tie together is the idea of welfare capitalism. The first source explains how people looked out for the collective interest, which is essentially the same idea as welfare capitalism in the sense that everyone is looking out for people who can’t necessarily look out for themselves. The reason why the second source ties in with welfare capitalism is that the idea behind welfare is the government doesn’t want people (in this case, the bear) on the street begging, so they provide a source of income until they can get back on their feet. Another way the two sources tie together is their sense of liberalism. Source I is an example of contemporary liberalism (welfare state being the idea), where everyone has a safety net to fall into when they cannot provide for themselves.  Source II is an example of classical liberalism (self interest and competition being the idea), where it is tough luck if you cannot provide for yourself.<br />In conclusion, the two sources are examples of welfare capitalism, whereas Source I is a product of it and Source II is the reason why it was developed. This example of liberalism does tie in also with some collectivist views where the people are looking out for the common good of everyone. <br />   <br /> <br />
Coll

More Related Content

What's hot

Source Analysis
Source AnalysisSource Analysis
Source Analysisnielsenb1
 
Liberalism & it's effect on society
Liberalism & it's effect on society Liberalism & it's effect on society
Liberalism & it's effect on society Yousef al-Khattab
 
Overview of Socialism 12.08
Overview of Socialism 12.08Overview of Socialism 12.08
Overview of Socialism 12.08sarahbutterworth
 
Political ideologies and beliefs
Political ideologies and beliefsPolitical ideologies and beliefs
Political ideologies and beliefsquillinn
 
Representation Yusuf.Onur
Representation Yusuf.OnurRepresentation Yusuf.Onur
Representation Yusuf.OnurYusuf Cetin
 
Marxist criticism
Marxist criticismMarxist criticism
Marxist criticismsheelu57
 
Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.
Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.
Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.gtvboss
 
Conservatism, Liberalism & Nationalism
Conservatism, Liberalism & NationalismConservatism, Liberalism & Nationalism
Conservatism, Liberalism & NationalismFawad Kiyani
 
Source analysis
Source analysisSource analysis
Source analysisLaceyP
 
Perspectives On Ideology
Perspectives On IdeologyPerspectives On Ideology
Perspectives On Ideologycatsnpizza
 
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIESPOLITICAL IDEOLOGIES
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIESMiss Ivy
 
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISM
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISMPOLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISM
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISMGeorge Dumitrache
 
Liberalism in the Philippines
Liberalism in the PhilippinesLiberalism in the Philippines
Liberalism in the PhilippinesFnf Manila
 
Politics ideologies
Politics ideologiesPolitics ideologies
Politics ideologieslecky2012
 

What's hot (20)

Source Analysis
Source AnalysisSource Analysis
Source Analysis
 
Liberalism & it's effect on society
Liberalism & it's effect on society Liberalism & it's effect on society
Liberalism & it's effect on society
 
CHAPTER 5 - DISS
CHAPTER 5 - DISSCHAPTER 5 - DISS
CHAPTER 5 - DISS
 
Overview of Socialism 12.08
Overview of Socialism 12.08Overview of Socialism 12.08
Overview of Socialism 12.08
 
Political ideologies and beliefs
Political ideologies and beliefsPolitical ideologies and beliefs
Political ideologies and beliefs
 
Representation Yusuf.Onur
Representation Yusuf.OnurRepresentation Yusuf.Onur
Representation Yusuf.Onur
 
Socialism
SocialismSocialism
Socialism
 
Marxist criticism
Marxist criticismMarxist criticism
Marxist criticism
 
Representation
RepresentationRepresentation
Representation
 
Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.
Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.
Louis althusser ideology by Murtaza Ali Ch.
 
Conservatism, Liberalism & Nationalism
Conservatism, Liberalism & NationalismConservatism, Liberalism & Nationalism
Conservatism, Liberalism & Nationalism
 
Source analysis
Source analysisSource analysis
Source analysis
 
Ideologies
IdeologiesIdeologies
Ideologies
 
Perspectives On Ideology
Perspectives On IdeologyPerspectives On Ideology
Perspectives On Ideology
 
A1
A1A1
A1
 
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIESPOLITICAL IDEOLOGIES
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES
 
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISM
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISMPOLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISM
POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES - THE SOCIALISM
 
Liberalism in the Philippines
Liberalism in the PhilippinesLiberalism in the Philippines
Liberalism in the Philippines
 
Politics ideologies
Politics ideologiesPolitics ideologies
Politics ideologies
 
Socialism
SocialismSocialism
Socialism
 

More from Kendra Horvath (20)

Grandmothers to grandmothers
Grandmothers to grandmothersGrandmothers to grandmothers
Grandmothers to grandmothers
 
The fog of war
The fog of warThe fog of war
The fog of war
 
Citizenship tasks
Citizenship tasksCitizenship tasks
Citizenship tasks
 
Humanities quiz
Humanities quizHumanities quiz
Humanities quiz
 
Exam review
Exam reviewExam review
Exam review
 
Citizenship oath
Citizenship oathCitizenship oath
Citizenship oath
 
Representative vs. authority
Representative vs. authorityRepresentative vs. authority
Representative vs. authority
 
Canada in afghanistan
Canada in afghanistanCanada in afghanistan
Canada in afghanistan
 
Comparrison in ideologies
Comparrison in ideologiesComparrison in ideologies
Comparrison in ideologies
 
Government
GovernmentGovernment
Government
 
John maynard keynes
John maynard keynesJohn maynard keynes
John maynard keynes
 
Modern vs. classical
Modern vs. classicalModern vs. classical
Modern vs. classical
 
One time only!
One time only!One time only!
One time only!
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Protection through suspension
Protection through suspensionProtection through suspension
Protection through suspension
 
Representative vs. authority
Representative vs. authorityRepresentative vs. authority
Representative vs. authority
 
The middle east
The middle eastThe middle east
The middle east
 
Kendra's ideology visual
Kendra's ideology visualKendra's ideology visual
Kendra's ideology visual
 
Moral chats
Moral chatsMoral chats
Moral chats
 
Marx
MarxMarx
Marx
 

Coll

  • 1. Coll-iberalism Welfare<br />There are two general types of ideologies depicted in the two sources provided. These ideologies are collectivist ideas for Source I and individualist ideas for Source II. In Source I, the ideas that make the source portray collectivist views come from Mary Anulik Kutsiq’s (author of the source) explanation of the Inuit community, which involved the people looking out for the collective interest by sharing necessities of everyday life with one another. She then goes on to explain that people in general today are too much involved with a classical sense of liberalism, which is to say that we as individual people hold self-interest and competition higher than the collective interest and collective responsibility. In Source II, the ideas that make the source portray individualist views come from the way the man talks to the bear and the man explains that in his day bears worked for their honey, instead of begging for it on the street. The man’s statement is an example of classical liberalism because the idea behind it was to work and compete against one another to earn your keep, rather than one’s earnings being handed to them by the government. <br /> The way the two sources tie together is the idea of welfare capitalism. The first source explains how people looked out for the collective interest, which is essentially the same idea as welfare capitalism in the sense that everyone is looking out for people who can’t necessarily look out for themselves. The reason why the second source ties in with welfare capitalism is that the idea behind welfare is the government doesn’t want people (in this case, the bear) on the street begging, so they provide a source of income until they can get back on their feet. Another way the two sources tie together is their sense of liberalism. Source I is an example of contemporary liberalism (welfare state being the idea), where everyone has a safety net to fall into when they cannot provide for themselves. Source II is an example of classical liberalism (self interest and competition being the idea), where it is tough luck if you cannot provide for yourself.<br />In conclusion, the two sources are examples of welfare capitalism, whereas Source I is a product of it and Source II is the reason why it was developed. This example of liberalism does tie in also with some collectivist views where the people are looking out for the common good of everyone. <br /> <br /> <br />