1. TOTAL Grade Range
FINAL
GRADE
0% D
50% C-
A B C D 55% C
A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D 60% C+
90-100% 85-89% 80-84% 75-79% 70-74% 65-69% 60-64% 55-59% 50-54% <49% 65% B-
70% B
75% B+
80% A-
85% A
100% of
Total
Grade
90% A+
100% 10%
100% 20%
100% 10%
100% 60% 100% A+
Grade A+
100%
FEEDBACK:
Score/100 Weighting
Heroes Vs Villains
Demonstrate that you have listened to feedback, and where appropriate, incorporated it into your work.
Demonstrate an understanding of how to portray emotions through subtleties in animation, such as; facial
expressions, breathing, weather, lighting, movement speed, and posing.
Sub-total
Keep a journal of thoughts, inspiration, and explanations of why you have chosen to do things the way you
have.
Create lore and backstory for characters and worlds, and demonstrate understanding of how these stories
impact your designs.
Name 100%
ASSESSMENT 1
Heroes Vs Villains A+
An excellent understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided
A good understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, perhaps with one
notable or a few minor
exceptions
An adequate understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, but with several
notable exceptions
No standards met AND/OR a
poor understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, AND/OR criteria
cannot be fully assessed due to
some missing work AND/OR an
element created by someone
else has been used without
permission

3. TOTAL Grade Range
FINAL
GRADE
0% D
50% C-
A B C D 55% C
A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D 60% C+
90-100% 85-89% 80-84% 75-79% 70-74% 65-69% 60-64% 55-59% 50-54% <49% 65% B-
70% B
75% B+
80% A-
85% A
20% of
Total
Grade
90% A+
80% 5% 100% A+
75% 10%
80% 5%
Grade B+
15.50%
30% of
Total
Grade
85% 15%
85% 15%
Grade A
25.50%
30% of
Total
Grade
78% 15%
76% 10%
75% 5%
Grade B+
23.05%
20% of
Total
Grade
80% 15%
80% 5%
Grade A-
16.00%
Show a final environment conceptual work per the parameters of the brief;
Justin Yong 80%
3D Environment Creation
A-
An excellent understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided
A good understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, perhaps with one
notable or a few minor exceptions
An adequate understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, but with several notable
exceptions
No standards met AND/OR a poor
understanding and application of
the standards evident across the
body of work provided, AND/OR
criteria cannot be fully assessed
due to some missing work AND/OR
an element created by someone
else has been used without
permission
Score/100 Weighting
Part One: Environment Concepts And Final Design
Show understanding of a required style through visual medium by demonstrating various environment concepts or
through Mood board;
Part Four: Lighting / rendering and Final Clip
Demonstrate an understanding of environment story and rationale on the choosen design;
Sub-total
Part Two: Environment Modelling
Model has been appropriately modelled or sculpted in 3D space adhering to final environment concept;
Demostrated appropriate model topology which support the texturing and lighting work flow ;
Sub-total
Part Three: Character Texturing
Overall aesthetic of the 3D model is appealing and faithful to the original design goals;
Apply textures to character using shaders and nodes;
UVs are arranged neatly and proportionately;
Sub-total
Demonstrate convincing final environment by using appropriate lighting / rendering process;
Display overall project workflow clearly;
Sub-total

4. 0%
FEEDBACK:
Part Seven: Late Submission
As usual, you are a well-organised person. Keep it up. Good work in this project. Stil there is a room for
improvement. Good efforts on modelling and sculpting part followed proper edge flow and created
appropriate normal maps. Texturing part could have been better. Especially need focus on adding details
like believable worn out textures and shaders need to match the environment. Need research like, what
type of prop it is ?. how old it might be?. How it will react to light etc. Nice work on lighting part. Managed
to get an overall feel of the environment which matches to proposed design idea.

5. TOTAL Grade Range
FINAL
GRADE
0% D
50% C-
A B C D 55% C
A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D 60% C+
90-100% 85-89% 80-84% 75-79% 70-74% 65-69% 60-64% 55-59% 50-54% <49% 65% B-
70% B
75% B+
80% A-
85% A
10% of
Total
Grade
90% A+
80% 3% 100% A+
65% 3%
80% 4%
Grade B+
7.55%
20% of
Total
Grade
80% 10%
80% 10%
Grade A-
16.00%
20% of
Total
Grade
85% 10%
80% 5%
85% 5%
Grade A-
16.75%
Justin Yong 81%
Creature Character Build
A-
An excellent understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided
A good understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, perhaps with one
notable or a few minor exceptions
An adequate understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, but with several notable
exceptions
No standards met AND/OR a poor
understanding and application of
the standards evident across the
body of work provided, AND/OR
criteria cannot be fully assessed
due to some missing work AND/OR
an element created by someone
else has been used without
permission
Sub-total
Score/100 Weighting
Part One: Character Investigation and Design
Show understanding of a required style through visual medium;
Show a range of conceptual work per the parameters of the brief;
Demonstrate an understanding of orthographic technical drawings for referencing;
Sub-total
Part Two: Character Building
Model has been appropriately sculpted in 3D space adhering to 2D reference drawings;
Described model topology to make for ease of deformation in animation;
Part Three: Character Texturing
Overall aesthetic of the 3D model is appealing and faithful to the original design goals;
Apply textures to character using shaders and nodes;
UVs are arranged neatly and proportionately;
Sub-total

6. 20% of
Total
Grade
80% 6%
85% 8%
85% 6%
Grade A-
16.70%
20% of
Total
Grade
80% 10%
83% 10%
Grade A-
16.30%
10% of
Total
Grade
80% 5%
80% 5%
Grade A-
8.00%
0%
FEEDBACK:
Show understanding of animation principles to visually convey a characters personality;
Part Four: Character Rig
Joints and controls are correctly named, positioned appropriately and the outliner is clean;
Show understanding of contraints,orientation, grouping and parenting as required by character movements;
Demonstrate skinning process properly as needed by the character perfomances and overall Rig
Sub-total
Part FIVE: Character Animation
Part Seven: Late Submission
Good to see different variations in your concept designs. Excellent work in orthographic views of your final character design. This type of
work helps during the modelling process. In your concept design, you could have focused on shape language and proportions to show them
more as realistic creatures.
Great work on you character modelling. You seem you got good command on sculpting part as you managed to show subtle details in this
sculpting process. Keep it up.
In the texturing process also, you performed well. Good to see nice details in your character texturing.
Very well done in the rigging process. Outliner and controls hierarchy could have been tidy. Watch out next time. In animation part, you
took feedback very well and managed to show good performance with your character animation.
Good efforts in photo integrations. Good work on shadow pass. You could have tweaked on lighting further to match with the background.
Overall great job. You are very good at time and file management. It helps oyu every where. Keep It up.
Demonstrate compelling performances describing your character personality;
Sub-total
Part Six: Lighting / rendering and Final Clip
Demonstrate convincing final character by using appropriate lighting / rendering process;
Display overall project workflow clearly;
Sub-total

7. Total
Final
Grade
A B C D
A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D
90‐100% 85‐89% 80‐84% 75‐79% 70‐74% 65‐69% 60‐64% 55‐59% 50‐54% <49%
50% of
Total
Grade
85% 17%
95% 17%
85% 16%
Grade A
44.20%
Organise the presentation in a logical structure
Sub‐total
Orally deliver the content of the presentation in a confident, engaging manner
Justin Yong 81%
ASSESSMENT 1:
Presentation A-
An excellent understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided
A good understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, perhaps with one
notable or a few minor exceptions
An adequate understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, but with several notable
exceptions
No standards met AND/OR a poor
understanding and application of
the standards evident across the
body of work provided, AND/OR
criteria cannot be fully assessed
due to some missing work AND/OR
an element created by someone
else has been used without
permission
Score/100 Weighting
PRESENTATION
Summarise and discuss information on the company you have researched

8. 20% of
Total
Grade
50% 7%
85% 7%
90% 6%
Grade B
14.85%
30% of
Total
Grade
85% 15%
60% 15%
Grade B
21.75%
FEEDBACK:
Very good clear, confident delivery.
Overall, the presentation is really well put together, but a bit too much time was taken up by your showreel, it would have been better to
trim this down a bit for the presentation. You have not included your slides in the submission, but based on what was seen during the
presentation, they were simple, clear and well presented.
You’ve included a lot of notes and research in your submission but it would have been better to see you posting this in your journal.
PRESENTATION MATERIALS
Slides support the oral presentation and are carefully refined with appropriate use of design principles
Written presentation is clear, easy to read, and has been proof‐read for spelling and grammatical errors
Additional assets developed for the presentation show a clear relation to the creative output of the researched
company
Sub‐total
JOURNAL WORK
Research specific details on a company relevant to your field of study
Utilise online journal to record the development of effective materials to support the presentation
Sub‐total

9. TOTAL Grade Range
FINAL
GRADE
0% D
50% C-
A B C D 55% C
A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D 60% C+
90-100% 85-89% 80-84% 75-79% 70-74% 65-69% 60-64% 55-59% 50-54% <49% 65% B-
70% B
75% B+
80% A-
85% A
30% of
Total
Grade
90% A+
90% 15% 100% A+
90% 15%
Grade A+
27.00%
50% of
Total
Grade
70% 25%
90% 25%
Grade A-
40.00%
20% of
Total
Grade
80% 10%
100% 10%
Grade A+
18.00%
FEEDBACK:
JUSTIN YONG 85%
ASSESSMENT 1
personal investigation project
A
An excellent understanding and
application of the standards evident
across the body of work provided
A good understanding and application of
the standards evident across the body of
work provided, perhaps with one notable
or a few minor exceptions
An adequate understanding and
application of the standards evident
across the body of work provided, but
with several notable exceptions
No standards met AND/OR a poor
understanding and application of the
standards evident across the body of
work provided, AND/OR criteria cannot
be fully assessed due to some missing
work AND/OR an element created by
someone else has been used without
permission
Score/100 Weighting
planning and goals
Plan the project and goals using a schedule;
Identify appropriate topic and goal for the project time frame and provide rationale;
Sub-total
A solid output - it was great that you put your experiments into a short video and edited the video together as a piece. If there's one area that
could have used a bit more experimentation, it is in the attempt of more difficult shots, like having the unicycle go down stairs etc.
Sub-total
exploration and implementation
Evidence of exploration, trial and implemention of techniques regarding chosen topic;
Weekly journal documentation of goals achieved;
Sub-total
Reflection and presentation
Presentation of project development and outcome.
Reflection on successes and failings of project;

10. TOTAL
FINAL
GRADE
A B C D
A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D
90-100% 85-89% 80-84% 75-79% 70-74% 65-69% 60-64% 55-59% 50-54% <49%
100% of
Total
Grade
75% 30%
65% 40%
75% 10%
100% 20%
Grade B+
76.00%
FEEDBACK:
Score/100 Weighting
Improve work though a range of methods: peer/lecture feedback notes, diagrams, analysis of reference.
Justin Yong 76%
Diploma in Applied Animation
Advanced Principles of Animation B+
An excellent understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided
A good understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, perhaps with one notable
or a few minor exceptions
An adequate understanding and
application of the standards
evident across the body of work
provided, but with several notable
exceptions
No standards met AND/OR a poor
understanding and application of
the standards evident across the
body of work provided, AND/OR
criteria cannot be fully assessed
due to some missing work AND/OR
an element created by someone
else has been used without
permission
Nice reflection Justin. It would have been good to see you elaborate more on how successful or unsuccessful you were with applying
techniques to your animation. Your video reference was ok and the first note that accompanied it is a good example reflecting on what you
were aiming for.
Overall, you did well and your animation is improving but try to decicate more time towards video recording.
Total
Create Planning for animation through a range of medium: video recording, thumbnail sketches, notes, diagrams.
Analyse and critically reflect on successes as well as failures.
Effectively record your process through incremental updates, animation passes or layers of animation.