SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Cranial Deformations of
Native Peoples of North
America
By: Jessica Lawson
Artificial Cranial Deformation
 a human cultural phenomenon defined as a product of dynamic
distortion of the normal vectors of infantile neurocranial growth
through the agency of externally applied forces.
Four categories of deformation with subcategories of simple and
complex deformations:
Simple: Occipital Deformation-the back of head being very flat and meets
the top of the head at a nearly 90 degree angle to the top of the head that
is also nearly flat.
Simple: Lamdoidal Deformation- the top of the head having a nearly flat
resemblance while the back of the head slopes down toward the neck
leaving a small bulge in the back of the head down toward the neck.
Complex: Parallel-Fronto-Occipital Deformation-when the shape of the skull
is conical. It is long, and skinny, and extends up at a parallel angle from the
rest of the body.
Complex: Fronto-Vertico-Occipital Deformation-when the face of the skull is
shaped normally but the back of the head is a conical shape. The top and
back portions of the skull come together on the top potion of the head,
making a bun shaped protrusion.
• These deformations can happen intentionally, or through unintentional means and
happen when head is still malleable for up to 1st year of life.
Going to cover four different regions of North America, laying out different forms of
cranial deformations starting with:
Northwest Coast of North America
Most prominent type of deformation here is fronto-vertico-occipital flattening.
• One known tribe to have practiced this type of deformation was the Chinook.
• Noted through tales of Lewis and Clark as having heads “flattened in the most distinct manner”.
• More deformation in women-more pressure in society.
• In notes, a drawing that depicted Chinook using boards to stretch out child and flattening head by 2
boards strapped at acute angle, forming extreme pressure to back and front of head.
Why?
• Cultural belief system!
• Men with deformed skulls more brave and powerful.
• A molded head was sign of social status within tribes.
• Also molded skulls were a sign of beauty. More deformed, more beautiful.
• Slaves were NOT allowed the deform skulls, were in lowest ranking of all
Midwest Cranial Deformation
Hunter/Gatherer societies-Mississippian
Most prominent types of deformation was Lamdoidal and Occipital flattening.
• Found exhibiting porotic hyperstosis ( lesions on cranium that’s indicator of anemias).
At first, was believed that this deformation was sign of status, but lesions were signs
of nutritional stress one would expect of a person with low status.
• So was this these forms of cranial deformations intentional or unintentional?
In Ohio, crania were found deformed that also had pottery sherds and copper beads
within the burial sites.
Crania exhibiting cranial deformation had broader faces and lacked 3rd molar
eruption because of lack of space in posterior end of mandible.
Cradleboards?
Southeast Coast of North America
Most prominent type of deformation was parallel-fronto-occipital.
• One known tribe in area was known to use this cranial deformation-Choctaw.
This form of deformation of the cranium was by way of cradleboard.
A cradleboard is an oblong cradle formed like a trough. The end on which its head
rests is higher than the other part, and a padding is fixed on the forehead (of the
child) with a piece of cedar wood on top of it, and secured by means of cord passing
through small holes on each side of the cradle.
Cradleboards were brought up in WPA letters between early Anthros!
Told of how if child’s head wasn’t moulded, it meant the child was not “taken care
of” when infant.
• Headboard pressure being so great, cerebrospinal fluid came out of child’s nose.
Was deformation unintentional or intentional? Both?
Southwest Coast of North America
Lambdoidal and Occipital deformations are most
prominent.
Known tribes are the Mimbres, Ancestral Puebloan and
Hohokam.
Cradleboards used?
• A hard board was used for the back of the basket, case, or cradle
in which baby was carried in.
Hohokan Difference?
• No frontal flattening, with variation of “quite round” to “very
flat”
• Due to degree of hardness of skull or size of pad or pillow in which
was used to flatten, also amount of time child spent within the
device.
To the left?
• Left side of cranium would have more flattening than right side,
why would this be?
• Thought this was weird, and maybe the Hohokan held their
children differently in a cradleboard.

More Related Content

Similar to Cranial Deformations of Native Peoples of North America

Developmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipDevelopmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipArun Sivaram
 
AQUATIC MAMMALS.pptx
AQUATIC MAMMALS.pptxAQUATIC MAMMALS.pptx
AQUATIC MAMMALS.pptxSneha Manjul
 
Developmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipDevelopmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipArshad Shaikh
 
Brain Observation Report
Brain Observation ReportBrain Observation Report
Brain Observation ReportBrooke Curtis
 
Fetal head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetry
Fetal  head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetryFetal  head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetry
Fetal head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetryRasha Dabbagh
 
Native American Mythology
Native American MythologyNative American Mythology
Native American MythologyMr Miguel
 
Vertebral Canal Lecture Notes
Vertebral Canal Lecture NotesVertebral Canal Lecture Notes
Vertebral Canal Lecture NotesAnan
 
Evolution of man
Evolution of manEvolution of man
Evolution of manridhi7070
 
Evolution & Development of Face
Evolution & Development of FaceEvolution & Development of Face
Evolution & Development of Facedr mohd ullah khan
 
Cervical spine anatomy.pptx
Cervical spine anatomy.pptxCervical spine anatomy.pptx
Cervical spine anatomy.pptxHMU
 
Prenatal development of cranial base
Prenatal development of cranial basePrenatal development of cranial base
Prenatal development of cranial baseManasa Penumatsa
 
Evolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variation
Evolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variationEvolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variation
Evolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variationanimation0118
 
ZooCVABioIII.2013.Abante
ZooCVABioIII.2013.AbanteZooCVABioIII.2013.Abante
ZooCVABioIII.2013.AbanteMariel Marjes
 

Similar to Cranial Deformations of Native Peoples of North America (20)

Developmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipDevelopmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hip
 
Evolution of human face..
Evolution of human face..Evolution of human face..
Evolution of human face..
 
AQUATIC MAMMALS.pptx
AQUATIC MAMMALS.pptxAQUATIC MAMMALS.pptx
AQUATIC MAMMALS.pptx
 
Developmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hipDevelopmental dysplasia of hip
Developmental dysplasia of hip
 
The evolution of man
The evolution of manThe evolution of man
The evolution of man
 
Brain Observation Report
Brain Observation ReportBrain Observation Report
Brain Observation Report
 
Fetal head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetry
Fetal  head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetryFetal  head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetry
Fetal head, maternal pelvis & pelvimetry
 
anthro_ppt_11-12.ppt
anthro_ppt_11-12.pptanthro_ppt_11-12.ppt
anthro_ppt_11-12.ppt
 
Native American Mythology
Native American MythologyNative American Mythology
Native American Mythology
 
Vertebral Canal Lecture Notes
Vertebral Canal Lecture NotesVertebral Canal Lecture Notes
Vertebral Canal Lecture Notes
 
Mandible
MandibleMandible
Mandible
 
Ctev symposium 2015
Ctev symposium 2015Ctev symposium 2015
Ctev symposium 2015
 
Evolution of man
Evolution of manEvolution of man
Evolution of man
 
Complication of breech delivery.
Complication of breech delivery.Complication of breech delivery.
Complication of breech delivery.
 
External carotid artery
External carotid arteryExternal carotid artery
External carotid artery
 
Evolution & Development of Face
Evolution & Development of FaceEvolution & Development of Face
Evolution & Development of Face
 
Cervical spine anatomy.pptx
Cervical spine anatomy.pptxCervical spine anatomy.pptx
Cervical spine anatomy.pptx
 
Prenatal development of cranial base
Prenatal development of cranial basePrenatal development of cranial base
Prenatal development of cranial base
 
Evolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variation
Evolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variationEvolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variation
Evolution, Primatology, Human Ancestry, Physical variation
 
ZooCVABioIII.2013.Abante
ZooCVABioIII.2013.AbanteZooCVABioIII.2013.Abante
ZooCVABioIII.2013.Abante
 

Cranial Deformations of Native Peoples of North America

  • 1. Cranial Deformations of Native Peoples of North America By: Jessica Lawson
  • 2. Artificial Cranial Deformation  a human cultural phenomenon defined as a product of dynamic distortion of the normal vectors of infantile neurocranial growth through the agency of externally applied forces. Four categories of deformation with subcategories of simple and complex deformations: Simple: Occipital Deformation-the back of head being very flat and meets the top of the head at a nearly 90 degree angle to the top of the head that is also nearly flat. Simple: Lamdoidal Deformation- the top of the head having a nearly flat resemblance while the back of the head slopes down toward the neck leaving a small bulge in the back of the head down toward the neck. Complex: Parallel-Fronto-Occipital Deformation-when the shape of the skull is conical. It is long, and skinny, and extends up at a parallel angle from the rest of the body. Complex: Fronto-Vertico-Occipital Deformation-when the face of the skull is shaped normally but the back of the head is a conical shape. The top and back portions of the skull come together on the top potion of the head, making a bun shaped protrusion.
  • 3. • These deformations can happen intentionally, or through unintentional means and happen when head is still malleable for up to 1st year of life.
  • 4. Going to cover four different regions of North America, laying out different forms of cranial deformations starting with: Northwest Coast of North America Most prominent type of deformation here is fronto-vertico-occipital flattening. • One known tribe to have practiced this type of deformation was the Chinook. • Noted through tales of Lewis and Clark as having heads “flattened in the most distinct manner”. • More deformation in women-more pressure in society. • In notes, a drawing that depicted Chinook using boards to stretch out child and flattening head by 2 boards strapped at acute angle, forming extreme pressure to back and front of head. Why? • Cultural belief system! • Men with deformed skulls more brave and powerful. • A molded head was sign of social status within tribes. • Also molded skulls were a sign of beauty. More deformed, more beautiful. • Slaves were NOT allowed the deform skulls, were in lowest ranking of all
  • 5. Midwest Cranial Deformation Hunter/Gatherer societies-Mississippian Most prominent types of deformation was Lamdoidal and Occipital flattening. • Found exhibiting porotic hyperstosis ( lesions on cranium that’s indicator of anemias). At first, was believed that this deformation was sign of status, but lesions were signs of nutritional stress one would expect of a person with low status. • So was this these forms of cranial deformations intentional or unintentional? In Ohio, crania were found deformed that also had pottery sherds and copper beads within the burial sites. Crania exhibiting cranial deformation had broader faces and lacked 3rd molar eruption because of lack of space in posterior end of mandible. Cradleboards?
  • 6. Southeast Coast of North America Most prominent type of deformation was parallel-fronto-occipital. • One known tribe in area was known to use this cranial deformation-Choctaw. This form of deformation of the cranium was by way of cradleboard. A cradleboard is an oblong cradle formed like a trough. The end on which its head rests is higher than the other part, and a padding is fixed on the forehead (of the child) with a piece of cedar wood on top of it, and secured by means of cord passing through small holes on each side of the cradle. Cradleboards were brought up in WPA letters between early Anthros! Told of how if child’s head wasn’t moulded, it meant the child was not “taken care of” when infant. • Headboard pressure being so great, cerebrospinal fluid came out of child’s nose. Was deformation unintentional or intentional? Both?
  • 7. Southwest Coast of North America Lambdoidal and Occipital deformations are most prominent. Known tribes are the Mimbres, Ancestral Puebloan and Hohokam. Cradleboards used? • A hard board was used for the back of the basket, case, or cradle in which baby was carried in. Hohokan Difference? • No frontal flattening, with variation of “quite round” to “very flat” • Due to degree of hardness of skull or size of pad or pillow in which was used to flatten, also amount of time child spent within the device. To the left? • Left side of cranium would have more flattening than right side, why would this be? • Thought this was weird, and maybe the Hohokan held their children differently in a cradleboard.