The document provides plans and renderings for The Inn at Roderick Place, a unique destination inn in Thompson's Station, Tennessee. The inn was designed to embrace the character of a manor that had slowly grown through time, complementing the historic Roderick House on the property. Floor plans show the layout of the levels, including guest rooms, public spaces like a lounge and game room, and back-of-house areas. Exterior renderings depict the inn's arrival experience and views from the southwest and southeast, conveying the traditional character of the destination.

1. 1900 FOURTH
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
WEST BERKELEY INVESTORS, LLC
TCA # 2014-042
ZONING PROJECT APPROVAL
JULY 22, 2016
GROUND LEVEL VIEW AT CORNER OF FOURTH STREET & UNIVERSITY AVENUE
JAMIE WOLFF
SELECTED WORKS

2. my passion is design
“Choose a job you love and you will
never have to work a day in your life.”
-Confucius

3. 4 | WOLFF WOLFF | 5
STAGE3CANDIDATUREQUESTIONNAIRE
GAMESDELIVERY,EXPERIENCEANDVENUELEGACY
AECOM
Los Angeles, CA
2024 Olympic Bid Book
As an independent contractor for the sports division I was
allowed the opportunity to work on LA’s 2024 bid to host the
Olympic and Paralympic games.
My work included planning of the transportation, housing,
and logistics necessary to host the games along with the
diagrams and exhibits needed to convey such information.
However, most of my work is still in use for the bidding
process and is therefore not public and cannot be shown.
These are a few of the samples that are public to give and
idea of what we were doing for the bid book.
rendering updates
While outside consultants produced most of the renderings
for the bid book there were constant changes being made to
the plans for the different venues and locations.
I was tasked with updating the renderings in photoshop
to match the current plans and the full vision of the VP of
operations.
LA 2024 / STAGE 3 3.4 Venues
offer an outstanding, if not unprecedented, business opportunity to draw new corporate partners to the
Paralympic Movement and strengthen its profile in the US.
The budget for the Paralympic Games was developed in close coordination with the budget for the
Olympic Games. There are only a few areas where revenue and expenses for the Paralympic Games were
separate from those of the Olympic Games—for all other areas, the budgets are closely intertwined. The
areas which are separate ensure that certain additional revenue and expenses for the Paralympic Games
are appropriately projected.
calculated for the Paralympic Games.
Additionally, specific grant revenues are available for the Paralympic Games but not for the Olympic
Games, including grant money from the Wounded Warrior Project and others.
All other revenue streams (i.e. sponsorship, merchandise and lottery) were integrated with the Olympic
Games projections. While the Paralympic Games will undoubtedly attract a number of corporate partners
who serve the disability community specifically, those revenues are part of the overall revenue numbers.
EXPENSES
While the vast majority of the Paralympic Games expense budget is integrated with the Olympic Games
budget, certain items represent incremental costs for hosting the Paralympic Games, including new
venue overlay and infrastructure and other transition costs.
For venue infrastructure, the incremental Paralympic Games costs are embedded into the overall
infrastructure budget in the form of ramps, ADA seating/platforms, and other accessibility build-outs.
These costs are spread across the competition venues and Paralympic Village to support accessibility for
athletes with a wide variety of impairments. The costs are based on guidance from Games construction
experts who are familiar with the accessibility requirements for Paralympic athletes.
Any other costs determined by the number of Paralympic athletes or accredited workforce were directly
informed by those stakeholder numbers. For instance, food and beverage for Paralympic athletes,
Paralympic workforce costs, Paralympic technical official costs or Paralympic spectator transportation
elements could be analyzed specifically for the Paralympic Games period. Other costs, including
technology, logistics and venue rental costs were estimated, based on the Olympic and Paralympic Games
periods and not specifically separated for each.
Overall, while incremental and discrete costs for the Paralympic Games exist, they will be fully offset
by the Paralympic Games ticketing revenue and government grants in support of disability sport for
veterans. Further details on the incremental Paralympic Games costs and revenues have been submitted
separately for review.

4. 6 | WOLFF WOLFF | 7
58
59
60
53
57
56
54
55
50
49
38
40
41
46
47
44
45
43
48
39
51
42
24
52
31
35
18
34
28
23
26
32
21
25
20
27
16
19
22
12
7
11
10
4
8
6
4
14
4
36
6
9
30
2
1
15
6
7
17
5
22
3
29
10KM
FROM OV
DOWNTOWN SPORTS PARK
V
ALLEY SPORTS PAR
K
S
O
UTH BAY SPORTS PA
R
K
LO
N
G
BEACH SPORTS PA
RK
MTC
OV
2 C
3
MV
MPC
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
9
H
8
14
15
13
16
17
1819
20
22
23
24
21
1
26
25
30
27
29
LAX
IBC
28 C
3132
PACIFIC OCEAN
COLOR CODE
Existing - no permanent work
Existing - permanent work required
Planned - under construction
Additional
Temporary
C Opening and Closing Ceremonies
Olympic Live Site
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
LAX International Airport
Olympic Route Network
Freeway
Major Urban Arterial
Urban Rail
Bus Rapid Transit
Infrastructure Reference
Refer Table 50
LAX
00
OLYMPIC VILLAGE
Olympic Village
Main Training Center
Pauley Pavilion1
MTC
OV
DOWNTOWN SPORTS PARK
LA Memorial Coliseum
LA Football Club Stadium
Galen Center
Dedeaux Field
Staples Center
LA Convention Center - South Hall 1
LA Convention Center - South Hall 2
LA Convention Center - West Hall 1
LA Convention Center - West Hall 2
Microsoft Theater
Grand Park & LA City Hall
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
OTHER VENUES
COASTAL
Santa Monica Beach
Riviera Country Club
25
26
INGLEWOOD
The Forum
LA Stadium at Hollywood Park
27
28
STAND ALONE VENUES
Honda Center
Rose Bowl Stadium
Lake Perris
Frank G. Bonelli Park
Regional Football Stadiums
International Broadcast Center
29
30
31
32
33-37
IBC
VALLEY SPORTS PARK
Sepulveda Basin - Equestrian
Sepulveda Basin - Canoe Slalom
Sepulveda Basin - Shooting
13
14
15
SOUTH BAY SPORTS PARK
StubHub Stadium
StubHub Tennis Center
StubHub Velo Sports Center
StubHub Center Fields
16
17
18
19
LONG BEACH SPORTS PARK
Long Beach Arena
Long Beach Waterfront
Long Beach - BMX
Long Beach - Water Polo
Long Beach Pier
20
21
22
23
24
Media Village
Main Press Center
Olympic Family Hotels
MV
MPC
H
N
0 10KM
3. EVERYTHING
IN ITS PLACE
GAMES
CONCEPT
LA 2024 / STAGE 3
LA 2024 / STAGE 3 3.4 Venues / 41
44. A WELCOMING VILLAGE ENVIRONMENT
The University of California—Los Angeles (UCLA) campus is already highly
accessible and easy to navigate. This level of accessibility will continue at
Games time, and will be further augmented by internal Olympic Village
shuttles to support all Olympic and Paralympic Village residents. All major
Village services and residential accommodation are only a one to two minute
walk from the nearest planned internal Village shuttle stop.
In the northern hub, the maximum distance from the Main Transport Mall
to the furthest residential accommodation is 967 meters, with a maximum
gradient of 8.8 percent. The maximum distance from the Olympic Village
Plaza to the furthest residential accommodation is 1,105 meters, with
a maximum gradient of 8.8 percent. The maximum distance from the
Recreational Sports Complex to the furthest residential accommodation is
520 meters, with a maximum gradient of 7.3 percent. The maximum distance
between a residential accommodation and the furthest dining facility is 162
meters, with a maximum gradient of 1.1 percent.
TABLE 44 / GRADIENTS AND DISTANCES TO ACCOMMODATION
P
P
0 200m
N
5
6
6
6
3
2
1
4
112/0.3
245/0.7
998/3.0
134/0.4
80/0.2
164/0.5
283/0.8
130/0.4
234/0.7
268/0.8
304/0.9
265/0.8
396/1.2
138/0.4
121/0.4
P
University of California
Los Angeles (UCLA) Campus
UCLA Medical Center
WESTWOOD VILLAGE
SOUTH
VILLAGE HUB
NORTH
VILLAGE HUB
Underground
Structure
Pauley
Pavilion
Village
Store
DIAGRAM 44 / GRADIENTS AND DISTANCES TO ACCOMMODATION
LEGEND
1. Olympic Village Plaza
2. Welcome Center
3. Transport Mall
4. Polyclinic
5. NOC Services Center
6. Recreational Sports Facilities
Major Services Maximum Gradient (%) Maximum Distance (m)
North Hub South Hub North Hub South Hub
Olympic and Paralympic Village Plaza 8.3 8.0 1126 1931
Welcome Center 8.3 8.0 1126 1986
Transport Mall 8.3 8.0 804 1931
Polyclinic 8.3 8.0 804 1770
NOC/NPC Services Center 8.3 8.0 482 1600
Recreational Sports Facilities 3.3 8.0 130 1609
Main Dining Halls 1.8 3.8 321 127
Casual Dining 2.7 3.8 146 127
Village Shuttle Stop 0 4.3 10 40
Housing
Casual Dining
Main Dining
NOC/NPC Parking
Village Shuttle Stop
Secure Perimeter
Venue Entrance
Distance (m) / Travel time (minutes) @ 20 km/hr
P
000/0.0
context diagrams
“Map A” The games concept of 6 sports parks and their
connectivity not only between each other but with LA, the
proposed host city, as a whole.
“Map 44” Highlighting the strengths of the Olympic Village
plan with it’s many downtime amenities, easy navigation,
walk-ability and close proximity to 33% of the necessary
training venues.

5. 8 | WOLFF WOLFF | 9
EFB Architecture
Bishop, CA
bishop orthopedic center lobby
South facing large windows that could not be altered and a
high roof that wasn’t proportional to the width and length of
the room. The lobby needed to have a relaxed feeling while
remaining classy on a medium budget.
I used slats of wood to block the sun in the afternoons and cut
down the perceived height of the ceiling.

6. 10 | WOLFF WOLFF | 11
3D modeling and rendering
This home in particular added levels of difficulty in the way
that it cascaded down the side of the mountain. Instead of
standard levels in a multi-story home, it consisted of multiple
half-levels and changes in grade.
One of the greatest benefits I was able to provide EFB
Architecture was finding discrepancies in the drawings that
became clear once the plans were converted to 3D.
EFB Architecture
Bishop, CA
single family residential
The architect for this home brought me to the team to help
with 3d modeling and renders for client presentation.
In addition to helping the client visualize their home in it’s
entirety I worked with them on testing different colors and
materials for the exterior appearance.

7. 12 | WOLFF WOLFF | 13
The Inn at Roderick Place is to be a unique destination experience that combines all the grace of a destination Inn with dining conferencing and events at the Roderick House... the spa... and a health
center. This mix of offerings compliments the Roderick Place residential neighborhood and creates a regional destination for events, relaxation and getaway. The traditional character of the Inn
experience starts with the arrival house that immediately gives the guest a rich sense of arrival and comfort from the trip. It is both unexpected and familiar. Every room layout is defined by a
collection of imaginative furniture, furnishings, accessories and artwork secured within appropriate budgets. An inspired equestrian theme derived from the historical significance of the Roderick
legend will reflect a strong Tennessee flavor and , along with excellent management and F&B services, should prominently register this property with the other great inns of America.
The Inn
The
Roderick
House
The Spa
TCA Architects
Franklin, TN
the inn at roderick place
A unique destination opportunity that took
historical structure and turned it into an event
venue. The original Roderick House was the main
focal point while the Inn was complimentary.
The Inn was designed to embrace the character of
a manor that had slowly grown through time.
THE INN AT RODERICK PLACE
THOMPSON’S STATION, TENNESSEE TCA # 2015-046
FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN
FEBRUARY 26, 2016
C & L Development ARTIST RENDERING
G-3.0
ARRIVAL EXPERIENCE
THE INN AT RODERICK PLACE FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGNC & L Development G-3.1
SOUTHWEST VIEW
THE INN AT RODERICK PLACE FINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGNC & L Development G-3.2
SOUTHEAST VIEW

8. 14 | WOLFF WOLFF | 15
DN
DN
DN
UP
UP
UP
UP
DN
SERVICEGUEST
PATIO
1,033 SF
LOUNGE
1,763 SF
GAME ROOM
220 SF
MEN'S
220 SF
WOMEN'S
136 SF
LUGGAGE
/ VALET
268 SF
H.K.
202 SF
H.K.
73 SF
STOR.
342 SF
OFFICE
135 SF
T.B.D.
1,200 SF
LOBBY
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
G
G
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
GOVERNORS SUITE
STANDARD
PUBLIC AREA
BOH
PUBLIC CIRCULATION
PRE-FUNCTION
195 SF
SALES OFFICE70 SF
STOR.
16'-1"
28' - 9"
S
DISPLAY
B
B
C C
AA
RODERICK HOUSE
821'-8-1/2"
809'-8"815'-8"
821'-8-1/2"
0' 16'8' 32'
THE INN AT
RODERICK PLACE
HOMPSON STATION, TN FEB. 25, 2016
01FLOOR PLANC & L DEVELOPMENT
TCA# 2015-046
1/16" = 1'-0"
1
SITE PLAN
UP
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
PRESIDENTIAL SUITE
GOVERNORS SUITE
STANDARD
BOH
PUBLIC CIRCULATION
268 SF
H.K.
SERVICEGUEST
G
G
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S S S S S
S
S S S
S
S
S
P
202 SF
H.K.
135 SF
T.B.D.
S
171 SF
STOR.
B
B
C C
AA
RODERICK HOUSE
0' 16'8' 32'
THE INN AT
RODERICK PLACE
THOMPSON STATION, TN FEB. 25, 2016
02FLOOR PLANC & L DEVELOPMENT
TCA# 2015-046
1/16" = 1'-0"
1
LEVEL 2 - KEYS PLAN
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL B1
ROOF
10'-0"10'-0"12'-0"12'-0"
S S S
SS S S S S STOR.
SSS
MEN'SGAME ROOM
S
S
LOUNGE
ELEC. RM. LAUNDRY AC ROOM PUMP ROOM HR / ADMIN DATA
OFFICE
ELEVATOR SHAFT
W
WOMEN'S PRE-FUNCTION
DECK
CORRIDOR CORRIDOR
POOL
M
6'-0"5'-4"
STOR.
DISPLAY
THE INN AT
RODERICK PLACE
THOMPSON STATION, TN FEB. 25, 2016
S1SECTION AC & L DEVELOPMENT
TCA# 2015-046
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL B1
ROOF
10'-0"10'-0"12'-0"12'-0"
PROPERTYLINE
COURTYARD
CORRIDOR
S
S
S
S
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL B1
ROOF
S
S
SS
P
P
12'-0"12'-0"10'-0"10'-0"
CORRIDOR
COURTYARD
POOL
POOL
6'-0"
RAMP
THE INN AT
RODERICK PLACE
THOMPSON STATION, TN FEB. 25, 2016
S2SECTION B & CC & L DEVELOPMENT
TCA# 2015-046 1/8" = 1'-0"
B
Section B
UP
UP
UP
UP
(14' x 20') (57' x 16')
(49' x 18') (17' x 18')
(10' x 18')
(15' x 18')
(25' x 16') (25' x 16')
(12' x 16')
(10' x 18')
(16' x 16')
DRYER VENT
SHAFT
TO POOL
SERVICE
313 SF
HR / ADMIN
377 SF
AC ROOM
1,009 SF
LAUNDRY
294 SF
ELEC. RM.
135 SF
DATA
183 SF
W
183 SF
M
186 SF
W
186 SF
M
300 SF
BREAK RM
837 SF
T.B.D.
171 SF
LOCKERS
236 SF
PUMP ROOM
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
PUBLIC AREA
BOH
BACK OF HOUSE
CIRCULATION
342 SF
POOL EQUIPMENT
RAMP
(18' x 19')
AA
RODERICK HOUSE
0' 16'8' 32'
THE INN AT
RODERICK PLACE
THOMPSON STATION, TN FEB. 25, 2016
B1FLOOR PLANC & L DEVELOPMENT
TCA# 2015-046
1/16" = 1'-0"
1
LEVEL B1 - KEYS PLAN
schematic revit floor plans
schematic revit sections

9. 16 | WOLFF WOLFF | 17
SHEA SHIPWAYS
ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA
SHEA PROPERTIES
TCA # 2014-115
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SEPTEMBER 02, 2016
40’0’ 80’ 160’ A-1.0SITE PLANSHEA SHIPWAYS
ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA
SHEA PROPERTIES
TCA # 2014-115
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SEPTEMBER 02, 2016
40’0’ 80’ 160’ A-1.2LEVELS 2-4 (TYPICAL)
TCA Architects
Alameda Island, CA
revit concept design
A small showcase of the capabilities of
Revit during the conceptual stages of a
project.
All work was done in Revit and updated
automatically with the project statistics
as we further developed the site.

10. 18 | WOLFF WOLFF | 19
2nd Year Studio
Cal Poly Pomona
lennox tech academy
A high school located in Lennox, CA
directly under the flight path of the LAX
airport. The main concerns of the site
were noise and air pollution.
In response; I situated the majority of the
learning environment underground.

11. 20 | WOLFF WOLFF | 21
Masters Thesis
Cal Poly Pomona
graphic design book cover
My thesis was a rehabilitation center that allowed mothers and their children to go through the recovery process
simultaneously. I titled this program “New Beginnings” and it consisted of a 3 phase rehabilitation that finished
with the mother gaining a new outlook on how to handle the stresses of life.
I designed the cover as a symbol of the “New Beginnings” process. The colors of the rainbow were showcased as a
symbol of new beginnings, as well as the inclusion of children in the rehabilitation. The graphics represented the
process of a messy beginning leading to a rebirth, and then a clear and refocused outlook.

12. 22 | WOLFF WOLFF | 23
1900 FOURTH
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
WEST BERKELEY INVESTORS, LLC
TCA # 2014-042
ZONING PROJECT APPROVAL
JULY 22, 2016
G-2.2SITE CONCEPT DIAGRAMS
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL CHIC
FIGURE / GROUND
• The site is subdivided to address existing urban fabric
• Site permeability is consistent with character of Fourth St.
CONNECTIVITY
• Public transportation and major circulation arteries
• Bring Fourth St. retail experience further south
PLACE MAKING
• Corner “jewel” building and retail paseo draws people
inward
• Active interaction between public and residential
experiences
ARCHITECTURAL AESTHETIC
• Large-format industrial materials & massing scale along
University Ave. overpass and train traffic while Fourth St.
aesthetic and retail experience drives alternate expression
& smaller massing
• Massing designed to individualize building aesthetics and
experience
CONTEXTUAL SCALE
• Footprints address scale and proportions of area
• Building scale responds to adjacent fine grain of Fourth
St. retail with elevated overpass & high-density mixed-
use beyond.
EDGE CONDITIONS
• Larger building masses define urban edges/adjacencies
& buffer lower scale retail environment
• Blend open space into overall site plan
• Parking as buffer in opportune location and removed
from pedestrian experience
FOURTH ST.
RAILROAD
HEARSTAVE.
UNIVERSITYAVE.OVERPASS
1900 FOURTH
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
WEST BERKELEY INVESTORS, LLC
TCA # 2014-042
ZONING PROJECT APPROVAL
JULY 22, 2016
G-2.2SITE CONCEPT DIAGRAMS
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL CHIC
FIGURE / GROUND
• The site is subdivided to address existing urban fabric
• Site permeability is consistent with character of Fourth St.
CONNECTIVITY
• Public transportation and major circulation arteries
• Bring Fourth St. retail experience further south
PLACE MAKING
• Corner “jewel” building and retail paseo draws people
inward
• Active interaction between public and residential
experiences
ARCHITECTURAL AESTHETIC
• Large-format industrial materials & massing scale along
University Ave. overpass and train traffic while Fourth St.
aesthetic and retail experience drives alternate expression
& smaller massing
• Massing designed to individualize building aesthetics and
experience
CONTEXTUAL SCALE
• Footprints address scale and proportions of area
• Building scale responds to adjacent fine grain of Fourth
St. retail with elevated overpass & high-density mixed-
use beyond.
EDGE CONDITIONS
• Larger building masses define urban edges/adjacencies
& buffer lower scale retail environment
• Blend open space into overall site plan
• Parking as buffer in opportune location and removed
from pedestrian experience
FOURTH ST.
RAILROAD
HEARSTAVE.
UNIVERSITYAVE.OVERPASS
context diagrams
The city’s main concern was how the project’s
size would weave into the existing context. So
we created multiple diagrams showing how the
project conformed to the city’s requirements.
1900 FOURTH
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
WEST BERKELEY INVESTORS, LLC
TCA # 2014-042
ZONING PROJECT APPROVAL
JULY 22, 2016
SITE CONCEPT DIAGRAMS
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL CHIC
FIGURE / GROUND
• The site is subdivided to address existing urban fabric
• Site permeability is consistent with character of Fourth St.
CONNECTIVITY
• Public transportation and major circulation arteries
• Bring Fourth St. retail experience further south
PLACE MAKING
• Corner “jewel” building and retail paseo draws people
inward
• Active interaction between public and residential
experiences
ARCHITECTURAL AESTHETIC
• Large-format industrial materials & massing scale along
University Ave. overpass and train traffic while Fourth St.
aesthetic and retail experience drives alternate expression
& smaller massing
• Massing designed to individualize building aesthetics and
experience
CONTEXTUAL SCALE
• Footprints address scale and proportions of area
• Building scale responds to adjacent fine grain of Fourth
St. retail with elevated overpass & high-density mixed-
use beyond.
EDGE CONDITIONS
• Larger building masses define urban edges/adjacencies
& buffer lower scale retail environment
• Blend open space into overall site plan
• Parking as buffer in opportune location and removed
from pedestrian experience
FOURTH ST.
HEARST
UNIVERSITYAV
1900 FOURTH
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
WEST BERKELEY INVESTORS, LLC
TCA # 2014-042
ZONING PROJECT APPROVAL
JULY 22, 2016
G-2.2SITE CONCEPT DIAGRAMS
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL CHIC
FIGURE / GROUND
• The site is subdivided to address existing urban fabric
• Site permeability is consistent with character of Fourth St.
CONNECTIVITY
• Public transportation and major circulation arteries
• Bring Fourth St. retail experience further south
PLACE MAKING
• Corner “jewel” building and retail paseo draws people
inward
• Active interaction between public and residential
experiences
ARCHITECTURAL AESTHETIC
• Large-format industrial materials & massing scale along
University Ave. overpass and train traffic while Fourth St.
aesthetic and retail experience drives alternate expression
& smaller massing
• Massing designed to individualize building aesthetics and
experience
CONTEXTUAL SCALE
• Footprints address scale and proportions of area
• Building scale responds to adjacent fine grain of Fourth
St. retail with elevated overpass & high-density mixed-
use beyond.
EDGE CONDITIONS
• Larger building masses define urban edges/adjacencies
& buffer lower scale retail environment
• Blend open space into overall site plan
• Parking as buffer in opportune location and removed
from pedestrian experience
FOURTH ST.
RAILROAD
HEARSTAVE.
UNIVERSITYAVE.OVERPASS
FOURTH STREET PARKING GARAGE ENTRY FLANKED BY RETAIL
TCA Architects
Berkeley, CA
mixed-use wrap product
30,000 SF of retail and restaurant space at the ground level
with 155 dwelling units above, and a wrapped parking
structure.
I worked on the schematic design phase and was allowed to
take it through to the entitlement submittal.

13. 24 | WOLFF WOLFF | 25
Previous Design
Previous Design
Revised Design
GROUND LEVEL VIEW AT CORNER OF FOURTH STREET & UNIVERSITY AVENUE
RETAIL
2| PARKING GARAGE AS SEEN ALONGTHE RAILROA
Existing ±9.5’
Proposed ±9.5’
Existing ±9.5’
Proposed ±9.5’
Transformers (Typ.) Ground Level Amtrak Boarding Platform
Possible
Location
for Art
UNIVERSITY AVE.HEARST AVE.EXISTING
RETAIL
PLPL
20’10’10’10’11’
4’61’TOPOFPLATE
65’OVERALBUILDNGHEIGHT
T.O. PARAPET
(+74.5’)
T.O. PLATE
(+70.5’)
Level 5 (+59.5’)
Level 4 (+49.5’)
Level 3 (+39.5’)
Level 2 (+29.5’)
PODIUM
TYPEVTYPEI
20’10’10’10’11’
10’61’TOPOFPLATE
71’OVERALBUILDNGHEIGHT
T.O. PLATE
(+70.5’)
T.O. PARAPET
(+80.5’)
Level 5 (+59.5’)
Level 4 (+49.5’)
Level 3 (+39’)
Level 2 (+29.5’)
PODIUM
TYPEVTYPEI
14B 214A85514F416A
66 11B11B6213A
2
2| PARKING GARAGE ACCESS REVEALED AT CORNER AS RAILROAD BAR
BUILDING ERODES AT GRADE. RETAIL CHARACTER & PEDESTRIAN SCALE
ESTABLISH NORTH OF GARAGE ENTRY.
3| PARKING GARAGE FACING THE RAILROAD WITH SCULPTURAL
EXTERIOR STAIR & ART OPPORTUNITIES
HEARSTAVE.
1 Horizontal Cementitious Siding
2 Metal Panel
3 Light Weight Metal Panel
4 Vertical Metal Siding
5 Exterior Plaster
6 Concrete With Skim Coat
7 Concrete Masonry Unit
8 Perforated Metal Screen
9 S
10 S
11 R
12 A
13 G
14 W
15 S
16 R
MATERIAL LEGEND (See exterior material sheets A-7
Revised Design
client directed design changes
The client felt that the east elevation of the project was too
bulky and needed to be more inviting due to it’s location.
I was allowed to redesign the commercial corner as well as
the resident lobby and face of the parking structure in order
to address their concerns.
GROUND LEVEL VIEW AT CORNER OF FOURTH STREET & UNIVERSITY AVENUE

14. 26 | WOLFF WOLFF | 27
Podium Level Floor Plan
Exiting and Occupancy
Diagrammatic Floor Plans

15. 28 | WOLFF WOLFF | 29
Thank you for your time and consideration