Part I The Trade-Off Analysis In considering healthcare system trade-offs, politics plays a major role. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the current Medicaid system in the United States based on individual state policies is important to the political and legal platforms each state faces. As organizations seek to implement HMIS and IT program development, upgrades, and evaluations the organizations must be capable of separating the IT failures, budget overruns, and exogenous changes in enrollment that affect the healthcare system. In a minimum of 250 words, discuss the following: Who is responsible on the state political level to propose legislature to overcome healthcare organizations concerns (trade-off) relating to patient enrollment and budget overruns? What is Georgia’s responsibility in preparation for healthcare change such as the ACA? How do healthcare leaders best integrate pre-existing conditions and long-term illness? Must use at least one scholarly source and document all sources in APA style. Part II Overcoming Public Disinterestedness Understanding the responsibility and concerns of healthcare is important in creating policies that leadership can use to streamline success. If strategic leadership is not realized over time, healthcare organizations’ political influences may face challenges and create public disinterestedness in health policies. These issues create restrictions on the healthcare organization’s ability to meet its financial budget, gain the community’s trust and involvement, and secure political influence(s). This negatively impacts the overall performance of the healthcare organization. The ideas of process innovation, risk-taking, health building analysis, and governance greatly impacts “sense-making” for those being led. These ideas bring understanding to the role of governance in the organization. Review the case study “Australian Surgery Indicator Makes the Front Page” in the attachment and discuss the following questions in a minimum of 250 words: After your review, do the conclusions you draw from the case justify the headline? Why or why not?  Discuss the indications found in Table 15-1 and their effect on the health care organizations' efficiency in elective surgery. Evaluate the avoidable rate of canceled surgeries and develop an implementation plan to overcome the concerns. Develop a mini policy to address the issues between the doctors and the organization. Must use at least one scholarly source in addition to the source in the attachment and document all sources in APA style. .

1. Part I
The Trade-Off Analysis
In considering healthcare system trade-offs, politics plays a
major role. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the
current Medicaid system in the United States based on
individual state policies is important to the political and legal
platforms each state faces. As organizations seek to implement
HMIS and IT program development, upgrades, and evaluations
the organizations must be capable of separating the IT failures,
budget overruns, and exogenous changes in enrollment that
affect the healthcare system. In a minimum of 250 words,
discuss the following:
Who is responsible on the state political level to propose
legislature to overcome healthcare organizations concerns
(trade-off) relating to patient enrollment and budget overruns?
What is Georgia’s responsibility in preparation for healthcare
change such as the ACA?
How do healthcare leaders best integrate pre-existing conditions
and long-term illness?
Must use at least one scholarly source and document all sources
in APA style.
Part II
Overcoming Public Disinterestedness
Understanding the responsibility and concerns of healthcare is
important in creating policies that leadership can use to
streamline success. If strategic leadership is not realized over

2. time, healthcare organizations’ political influences may face
challenges and create public disinterestedness in health policies.
These issues create restrictions on the healthcare organization’s
ability to meet its financial budget, gain the community’s trust
and involvement, and secure political influence(s). This
negatively impacts the overall performance of the healthcare
organization. The ideas of process innovation, risk-taking,
health building analysis, and governance greatly impacts
“sense-making” for those being led. These ideas bring
understanding to the role of governance in the organization.
Review the case study “Australian Surgery Indicator Makes the
Front Page” in the attachment and discuss the following
questions in a minimum of 250 words:
After your review, do the conclusions you draw from the case
justify the headline? Why or why not?
Discuss the indications found in Table 15-1 and their effect on
the health care organizations' efficiency in elective surgery.
Evaluate the avoidable rate of canceled surgeries and develop
an implementation plan to overcome the concerns.
Develop a mini policy to address the issues between the doctors
and the organization.
Must use at least one scholarly source in addition to the source
in the attachment and document all sources in APA style.