In the attached presentation, you can get acquainted with a brief summary of the analysis results of JET BI products. If you are interested in learning more about JET BI products, please contact e-mail at sales@jetbi.com. We would be very interested in talking to you!

1. JET BI Products
Final results on retrospective analysis
and product voting

2. PRODUCT NAME
Does the
product
fulfill its
purpose
The
unique-
ness of the
solution
Innovative-
ness of
product
Product
use
potential
inside JetBI
Real
usage
inside
Jet BI
Ease of
impleme-
ntation
Product
flexibility
Product
Kudos
Possibility
of product
monetiza-
tion
Percentage
of capacity
that you are
willing to
spend on
work on the
product
Percentage
of the
salary that
you are
willing to
invest in the
product
TOTAL
SUM
B4G 8.00 2.69 1.01 4.19 7.00 3.16 0.57 7.56 6.67 4.44 2.00 47.27
Parking Cloud 7.63 2.13 1.80 0.75 0.00 1.87 0.56 8.33 8.89 6.88 7.15 45.97
Smart Shelf 6.13 2.25 1.76 2.69 2.00 2.04 0.60 7.89 8.89 7.86 3.34 45.45
eLearning 8.63 3.06 1.05 4.63 9.00 2.76 0.59 6.56 6.67 1.40 0.34 44.67
Leave Planner 8.50 2.88 1.28 4.50 10.00 2.49 0.56 5.78 5.56 0.00 0.00 41.53
VR for Real Estate 6.63 1.94 2.03 0.81 0.00 1.51 0.57 8.44 10.00 5.86 3.15 40.93
Advantage 6.50 2.30 1.44 2.25 0.00 1.96 0.56 8.00 9.00 3.43 3.50 38.94
Capacity planning 6.50 2.56 1.24 4.13 10.00 2.58 0.52 5.56 3.33 1.26 0.00 37.68
Karma 4.25 2.50 1.16 2.75 7.00 2.98 0.57 5.56 4.44 2.86 3.33 37.40
Komunikado 6.50 2.63 1.24 3.19 4.00 1.82 0.59 6.44 7.78 1.58 0.34 36.10
Conversayit 6.50 2.63 1.16 1.75 0.00 2.40 0.63 6.67 7.78 2.79 0.67 32.97
Agenda Runner 5.00 2.56 1.24 3.13 3.00 2.49 0.50 5.22 5.56 0.43 1.67 30.79
Smart Work Space 3.30 2.30 1.77 2.00 0.00 2.07 0.48 5.91 4.55 2.31 2.89 27.58
Work Tracker 4.00 3.06 1.01 2.38 1.00 2.27 0.51 4.56 4.44 0.14 0.33 23.71
Smart Approval - - - - -- - - - - - - -
OptiApp - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jet BI TV - - - - - - - - - - - -
Formula for calculating the
metric (where “x” is the avarage
number of points based on the
voiting results)
x*1 (10-x)*0.8 x*0.3 x*0.5 x*1 x*0.4 x*0.1 x*1 x*1
1% =
1 point
1% =
2 points

3. ADVANTAGES:
● Ability to book places remotely in conditions of limited office space
● Real-time tracking of workplaces usage
● Ability to track the movement of equipment
DISADVANTAGES:
● The expediency of using the sensor is not clear (all tasks can be solved only with the
help of booking)
● Inconvenient interface for creating a floor plan
● Competitive advantage over standard slot booking plugins is not clear
● There are cheaper and simpler analogs that allow you to track the use of workplaces,
such as the access system at each office
● No enough experience in hardware development
● Inaccurate information from sensors
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Freeze development (or bring it to the state of a working prototype)
● Implement in JET BI
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 3.30
The uniqueness of the solution 2.30
Innovativeness of product 1.77
Product use potential inside JetBI 4.00
Product use potential inside Jet BI 2.00
Real usage inside Jet BI 0.00
Ease of implementation 2.07
Product flexibility 0.48
Product Kudos 5.91
Possibility of product monetization 4.55
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
2.31
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
2.89
TOTAL SUM 27.58
Smart Workspace

4. ADVANTAGES:
● Structuring and control on the meeting results
● Time administration of agenda items discussion
● Disciplines employees to collect necessary info in meetings
DISADVANTAGES:
● Word document provides great flexibility in taking notes and recording answers to
questions
● Due to the fact that filling out the protocol during the meeting is carried out in a
short version, and only after the meeting this protocol is expanded, users needs
make more actions for meeting minutes adjusting
● Tickets should be edited in any case, since when creating tickets through the
agenda runner, the fields that are in the gir are not displayed (due date, estimate
time, and so on)
● Tasks execution time of the manager is increased
● Inconvenient interface
● Limited functionality
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● To force managers to launch the product for usage and collect new feedback
● To freeze development
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 5.00
The uniqueness of the solution 2.56
Innovativeness of product 1.24
Product use potential inside JetBI 6.25
Product use potential inside Jet BI 3.13
Real usage inside Jet BI 3.00
Ease of implementation 2.49
Product flexibility 0.50
Product Kudos 5.22
Possibility of product monetization 5.56
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
0.43
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
1.67
TOTAL SUM 30.79
Agenda Runner

5. ADVANTAGES:
● The product is in line with the Salesforce ecosystem and extends the standard
functionality
● Ability to create, store and use scripts
● Sales process automation
● Control of corporate communications
DISADVANTAGES:
● No user testing (it is not clear if the product is useful at all)
● The user needs to independently create scripts
● Scripts are created only through the application (there is no way to load the script
from the outside)
● The scenario of use is not clear when branching from the script
● Many competitors
● No ready-made scripts
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Test the solution on real users
● Continue to develop
● Direct resources to marketing and sales
● Search for an investor
● Implement for use inside JET BI
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 6.50
The uniqueness of the solution 2.63
Innovativeness of product 1.16
Product use potential inside JetBI 3.50
Product use potential inside Jet BI 1.75
Real usage inside Jet BI 0.00
Ease of implementation 2.40
Product flexibility 0.63
Product Kudos 6.67
Possibility of product monetization 7.78
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
2.79
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
0.67
TOTAL SUM 32.97
Conversayit

6. ADVANTAGES:
● Data sync between Jira and Salesforce
● Economical option for data synchronization
DISADVANTAGES:
● The complexity of the product to use
● Unattractive design
● Not reliable
● Difficult to implement the product
● Many competitors with already working and reliable solutions
● No external users test results
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Finish coming tasks
● Conduct tests on new metrics inside JET BI
● Increase resources for marketing and sales
● Provide the solution to customers as a bonus
● To publish app on AppExchange
Komunikado METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 6.50
The uniqueness of the solution 2.63
Innovativeness of product 1.24
Product use potential inside JetBI 6.38
Product use potential inside Jet BI 3.19
Real usage inside Jet BI 4.00
Ease of implementation 1.82
Product flexibility 0.59
Product Kudos 6.44
Possibility of product monetization 7.78
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
1.58
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
0.34
TOTAL SUM 36.10

7. ADVANTAGES:
● Gives an opportunity for employees to express their attitude towards colleagues
● Gives an ability to assess interpersonal relationships within the company
● Gives an ability to the manager to see the feedback on the employee
● Gamification through scoring
● Involvement of employees in the life of the company
● Motivation tool for improving softskills
DISADVANTAGES:
● Weak motivation for employees to give points to other employees
● Weak motivation to receive points from other employees
● Final product goal is vague
● Necessary manually read all comments (if a company of 30 employees use all 5
karma points per day, then 3000 messages will be typed in 20 working days)
● The one who is left with a comment does not see this comment
● Risk of contractual assessments
● No direct effect on the financial performance of the company
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Freeze development
● Redesign the product concept (define role models, define metrics, determine what
benefits it will bring to all users)
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 4.25
The uniqueness of the solution 2.50
Innovativeness of product 1.16
Product use potential inside JetBI 5.50
Product use potential inside Jet BI 2.75
Real usage inside Jet BI 7.00
Ease of implementation 2.98
Product flexibility 0.57
Product Kudos 5.56
Possibility of product monetization 4.44
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
2.86
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
3.33
TOTAL SUM 37.40
Karma

8. ADVANTAGES:
● Ability to tentatively plan your resources
● Ability to compile reports on the planned workload of employees
● Visual demonstration of loading
DISADVANTAGES:
● Due to the discrepancy between the planned workload and the real workload
developers suffers
● Fully filled Capacity Planning tool creates a false sense of a full team load
● No grouping by projects
● There is no automatic indication of insufficient workload of employees (you need to
manually scroll and look for someone who lacks percentages)
● UI is not the most user-friendly
● No dashboards
● Inconvenient for long-term planning
● Applicable for small businesses only
● Limited functionality
● No display of how much load is required on projects in total
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Add groupings by projects
● Add access to retrospective reports for plan / fact compliance
● Add dashboards
● Continue to use in the company
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 6.50
The uniqueness of the solution 2.56
Innovativeness of product 1.24
Product use potential inside JetBI 8.25
Product use potential inside Jet BI 4.13
Real usage inside Jet BI 10.00
Ease of implementation 2.58
Product flexibility 0.52
Product Kudos 5.56
Possibility of product monetization 3.33
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
1.26
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
0.00
TOTAL SUM 37.68
Capacity Planning

9. ADVANTAGES:
● Ability to structure information on competitors and their products
● Analytics of information on competitors and their products
● Clear visualization of information on competitors and their products
● The product is in line with the Salesforce ecosystem and extends the standard
functionality
DISADVANTAGES:
● Complex customization
● The need to search data for Advantage manually
● The information used in the product has more value than the product itself
● Implementation of the solution makes sense only in companies with a customized
process of searching for information on competitors, since the process of searching
for data may turn out to be more expensive than the product itself
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Freeze development
● Implement for your own use
● To aim resources to sales and marketing
● Abandon the idea of “providing the product for free as a bonus”
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 6.50
The uniqueness of the solution 2.30
Innovativeness of product 1.44
Product use potential inside JetBI 4.50
Product use potential inside Jet BI 2.25
Real usage inside Jet BI 0.00
Ease of implementation 1.96
Product flexibility 0.56
Product Kudos 8.00
Possibility of product monetization 9.00
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
3.43
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
3.50
TOTAL SUM 38.94
Advantage

10. ADVANTAGES:
● Ability to sell real estate using innovative devices
● Ability to showcase real estate property that have not yet been built
● Information guide for the client
● Tracking users actions in virtual reality (the client can analyze user actions)
DISADVANTAGES:
● There are no qualified employees who could accompany the implementation
● No source renderings of real estate- no product
● We do not provide 3D modeling services
● There are no sellers who would sell the solution
● Due to the lack of sales, it is impossible to understand the pains that will occur in
further use
● The need for long-term communications with potential buyers
● Additionally, the customer needs hardware
● It is difficult to explain to the customer the capabilities of technologies, because of
this there is a discrepancy to expectations
● Long terms of implementation
● Absolute lack of understanding of exactly how to use the information
● The current real estate market is extremely conservative
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● To aim resources to sales and marketing
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 6.63
The uniqueness of the solution 1.94
Innovativeness of product 2.03
Product use potential inside JetBI 1.63
Product use potential inside Jet BI 0.81
Real usage inside Jet BI 0.00
Ease of implementation 1.51
Product flexibility 0.57
Product Kudos 8.44
Possibility of product monetization 10.00
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
5.86
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
3.15
TOTAL SUM 40.93
VR for Real Estate

11. ADVANTAGES:
● Working tool for monitoring vacations
● Reducing the time of approval of vacations
● Employees can easy control their vacations
● Ability to easily compare all vacations within the company
● Eliminates personal contact (a person does not hesitate to ask for a vacation)
● Intuitive UI
DISADVANTAGES:
● Poor code quality
● The grouping by which you can keep track of vacations is not entirely obvious
● With a large number of employees, it will be difficult to visually determine how
many people will be available on a particular day (you need to remember and scroll)
● Incomprehensible UI
● No indication of the performed Knowledge Transfer
● Lack of filtering by employees
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Add sorting functionality not only by employees, but also by dates
● Continue to use the solution internally
● Add new metrics for analytics
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 8.50
The uniqueness of the solution 2.88
Innovativeness of product 1.28
Product use potential inside JetBI 9.00
Product use potential inside Jet BI 4.50
Real usage inside Jet BI 10.00
Ease of implementation 2.49
Product flexibility 0.56
Product Kudos 5.78
Possibility of product monetization 5.56
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
0.00
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
0.00
TOTAL SUM 41.53
Leave Planner

12. ADVANTAGES:
● Presence of a corporate tool for storing the knowledge base
● The availability of a corporate tool for monitoring the knowledge of employees
● Ability to create custom training modules
● Low cost
● Easy to use
DISADVANTAGES:
● No questions - no product
● A large number of competitors
● No statistics on usage (what questions are difficult for employees, average test time, etc.)
● The “Employee prepares questions at will” model is ineffective, since the employee has no
motivation for this task. This model is possible only when setting tasks for preparing
questions within the framework of an employee's workload
● An administrator is needed to control the content in the product
● The product performs only the function of control of knowledge, but does not perform the
function of training employees
● Complicated question loading procedure
● There is no way to sort questions by topic or select narrow topics
● No accompanying teaching materials
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● To think over and implement functionality for user training
● Add tracking statistics on issues and topics
● Determine options for motivating employees to prepare content
● Add tools to control content quality
● Continue development
● Connect third-party users to our product and evaluate the effectiveness of use
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 8.63
The uniqueness of the solution 3.06
Innovativeness of product 1.05
Product use potential inside JetBI 9.25
Product use potential inside Jet BI 4.63
Real usage inside Jet BI 9.00
Ease of implementation 2.76
Product flexibility 0.59
Product Kudos 6.56
Possibility of product monetization 6.67
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
1.40
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
0.34
TOTAL SUM 44.67
eLearning

13. ADVANTAGES:
● Increase the loyalty of the client's employees
● Improving the quality of management of consumed resources
● The solution is easily scalable
● Suitable for retail
● Suitable for both B2B and B2C
DISADVANTAGES:
● Not enough specialists for development (hardware)
● There are no clear metrics to determine the effectiveness of use
● Needs a significant marketing budget
● There is no specific proposal for the customer yet
● Custom development will be very time consuming
● There is no understanding why integration with salesforce is a plus for the client
● Most products in the office do not need a shelf
● The shelf is not portable (you can't put it in the refrigerator)
● Adding a computer vision will require significant resources
● Few competitors, but among them Amazon, which also delivers supply
● In the hardware part, we lose in price to large shelf manufacturers
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Increase in marketing budget (search for exhibitions, targeted advertising)
● Implementation of the shelf in the use of Jet BI (with subsequent tests)
● Design and test several different shelves with different dimensions.
● Start small batch production
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 6.13
The uniqueness of the solution 2.25
Innovativeness of product 1.76
Product use potential inside JetBI 5.38
Product use potential inside Jet BI 2.69
Real usage inside Jet BI 2.00
Ease of implementation 2.04
Product flexibility 0.60
Product Kudos 7.89
Possibility of product monetization 8.89
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
7.86
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
3.34
TOTAL SUM 45.45
Smart Shelf

14. ADVANTAGES:
● Point control of parking spaces usage
● Thanks to SF, it is easy to process large amounts of data
● Parking is an urgent problem
● Provides information for calculating ROI on parking usage
DISADVANTAGES:
● No user test results
● The need for a separate parking application on the driver's phone
● Using archaic technologies for tracking
● We do not provide installation services
● Extremely expensive tests
● The metrics that will determine the benefits of using the solution are not clear
● We are not a manufacturer + a third-party manufacturer from Belarus, not from
America
● No influencer promoting the product
● Insufficiently active sales
● Expensive Salesforce licenses
● Not clear expediency of using Salesforce
● Bureaucracy and corruption among parking operators
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● Continue development
● Increase resources for marketing and sales
● Launch a publicly available pilot
● Find investors
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 7.63
The uniqueness of the solution 2.13
Innovativeness of product 1.80
Product use potential inside JetBI 1.50
Product use potential inside Jet BI 0.75
Real usage inside Jet BI 0.00
Ease of implementation 1.87
Product flexibility 0.56
Product Kudos 8.33
Possibility of product monetization 8.89
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
6.88
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
7.15
TOTAL SUM 45.97
Parking Cloud

15. ADVANTAGES:
● Social significance of the product
● New channel for news feed within the company
● Charity like team building
● Minimum spending of time for charity
● Gamification (bidding for a lot)
● Clear idea of the product
DISADVANTAGES:
● Poorly worked out benefits for the one who puts up the lot and for the one who pays
for the lot
● Lack of donation tracking (no understanding of the current status)
● Unpleasant web version design
● No process for interaction with social networks
● Only individuals
● Few features / Limited functionality
● Money is collected manually (no integration with payment services)
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH THE PRODUCT:
● To determine benefits for users of the product (the one who puts the lot and the
one who pays for the lot)
● Redesign the design
● Use inside JET BI
● Continue development
● Implement support and fix current bugs
● To aim resources to marketing
METRIC SCORE
Does the product fulfill its purpose 8.00
The uniqueness of the solution 2.69
Innovativeness of product 1.01
Product use potential inside JetBI 8.38
Product use potential inside Jet BI 4.19
Real usage inside Jet BI 7.00
Ease of implementation 3.16
Product flexibility 0.57
Product Kudos 7.56
Possibility of product monetization 6.67
Percentage of capacity that you are
willing to spend on work on the
product
4.44
Percentage of the salary that you
are willing to invest in the product
2.00
TOTAL SUM 47.27
B4G

16. PRODUCT NAME
Does the
product
fulfill its
purpose
The
unique-
ness of the
solution
Innovative-
ness of
product
Product
use
potential
inside JetBI
Real
usage
inside
Jet BI
Ease of
impleme-
ntation
Product
flexibility
Product
Kudos
Possibility
of product
monetiza-
tion
Percentage
of capacity
that you are
willing to
spend on
work on the
product
Percentage
of the
salary that
you are
willing to
invest in the
product
TOTAL
SUM
B4G 8.00 2.69 1.01 4.19 7.00 3.16 0.57 7.56 6.67 4.44 2.00 47.27
Parking Cloud 7.63 2.13 1.80 0.75 0.00 1.87 0.56 8.33 8.89 6.88 7.15 45.97
Smart Shelf 6.13 2.25 1.76 2.69 2.00 2.04 0.60 7.89 8.89 7.86 3.34 45.45
eLearning 8.63 3.06 1.05 4.63 9.00 2.76 0.59 6.56 6.67 1.40 0.34 44.67
Leave Planner 8.50 2.88 1.28 4.50 10.00 2.49 0.56 5.78 5.56 0.00 0.00 41.53
VR for Real Estate 6.63 1.94 2.03 0.81 0.00 1.51 0.57 8.44 10.00 5.86 3.15 40.93
Advantage 6.50 2.30 1.44 2.25 0.00 1.96 0.56 8.00 9.00 3.43 3.50 38.94
Capacity planning 6.50 2.56 1.24 4.13 10.00 2.58 0.52 5.56 3.33 1.26 0.00 37.68
Karma 4.25 2.50 1.16 2.75 7.00 2.98 0.57 5.56 4.44 2.86 3.33 37.40
Komunikado 6.50 2.63 1.24 3.19 4.00 1.82 0.59 6.44 7.78 1.58 0.34 36.10
Conversayit 6.50 2.63 1.16 1.75 0.00 2.40 0.63 6.67 7.78 2.79 0.67 32.97
Agenda Runner 5.00 2.56 1.24 3.13 3.00 2.49 0.50 5.22 5.56 0.43 1.67 30.79
Smart Work Space 3.30 2.30 1.77 2.00 0.00 2.07 0.48 5.91 4.55 2.31 2.89 27.58
Work Tracker 4.00 3.06 1.01 2.38 1.00 2.27 0.51 4.56 4.44 0.14 0.33 23.71
Smart Approval - - - - -- - - - - - - -
OptiApp - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jet BI TV - - - - - - - - - - - -
Formula for calculating the
metric (where “x” is the avarage
number of points based on the
voiting results)
x*1 (10-x)*0.8 x*0.3 x*0.5 x*1 x*0.4 x*0.1 x*1 x*1
1% =
1 point
1% =
2 points

17. General conclusions
01
Product Owners should spend more time defining and
validating product metrics
02
Lack of marketing efforts leads to problems in improving
the user experience from using the product.
03
It is imperative to determine the value of the product
not only for the key user, but also for all other role
models involved in the product usage cycle.
04 Simplicity of product idea mitigate limited functionality.

18. General conclusions
05
For products, the essence of which is working with
external information, it is necessary to focus on the
expertise in information analytics, rather than on the
functionality of the product.
06
If the purpose of using a product is not completely
obvious to its users, the effectiveness of the product
drops to zero.
07
It is necessary to exclude implementation of features
into the product , the hypothesis for which have not
been tested, at least at the level of preparing user stories.

19. Interesting in JET BI
jetbi.com ӏ sales@jetbi.com
Thank you for your time!
Good mood and productive work :)