2. Examining Leader’s
Characteristics
1. REGIME TYPE:
Regime type may play a role to examine leader characteristics.
Different regime types offer different levels of constraint on the
leader’s control of policy. For example, Kim Jong-un’s North
Korea, a dictator.
Nevertheless, it must be kept in mind that there is no regime
type that precludes (stops) a leader’s personal influence on
policy altogether, as have seen with Donald Trump and the
United States.
3. 2. LEADER’S INTEREST:
It matters whether a leader is interested in foreign policy.
Otherwise, it may delegate a large measure of authority to subordinates,
in which case it would be vital to identify and examine their
characteristics as well.
For example, after World War II, Francisco Franco openly commented on
his disinterest in foreign affairs, delegating most decision-making power to
his foreign minister.
Nevertheless, over the years his foreign minister began to make choices
that did not sit well with Franco, and eventually the minister was
dismissed.
4. Even a disinterested leader can become interested if the
context is right.
Leaders who have an emotional response to the issues
under discussion because of prior experience or memory
are also likely to leave more of a personal imprint on
foreign policy.
When dealing with Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, it mattered
that President George W. Bush knew Hussein had tried to
assassinate his father, George H. W. Bush.