1) Nutrition outcomes in Bihar have improved between 2006-2020 but undernutrition levels remain high, with stunting at 43%, wasting at 23% and severe wasting at 9% according to the latest NFHS data. 2) Intervention coverage and underlying determinants like access to sanitation and healthcare have also improved but poverty, food insecurity and lack of women's empowerment continue affecting nutrition levels. 3) The National Nutrition Mission launched in 2018 aims to strengthen programs focused on ICDS, health and sanitation but does not directly address poverty alleviation which is a major underlying cause of undernutrition in Bihar.

1. Improving nutrition in Bihar
Trends in outcomes, determinants and interventions
between 2006 and 2020
VERSION: Sep 23, 2021
This slide deck is an evolving work in progress, with updates being made frequently. If you want to use or
cite this, please email us at IFPRI-POSHAN@cgiar.org to receive the most updated version

2. Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2014 (6 mo): New
administration
established);
Nutrition community
develops LAA 2014
2015: NITI Aayog
established; Policy
priorities: Digital
India, Aadhar,
Sanitation Mission;
nutrition still a
“learning agenda”.
Other social welfare
programs reviewed
(e.g., NREGA)
2016: Stated policy
priorities
implemented.
Nutrition mission
inputs received from
multiple groups; July
finance ministry
meeting on nutrition
2017: Final nutrition
strategy unveiled by
NITI Aayog in
September;
acknowledges
underlying issues
(poverty, etc.) but
actions still focused
on ICDS-health
programs
2018: Nutrition
Mission launched in
March – strong ICDS-
Health-Sanitation
link. Poverty/food
insecurity still not
central to agenda
2019: Election year.
Nutrition Mission
strongly visible and
implemented (focus
on BCC, awareness);
poverty alleviation
not part of nutrition
agenda
2021: Mission
POSHAN 2.0
launched in Union
Budget 2021 to
improve nutritional
outcomes.
Nutrition on India’s policy agenda
• The Prime Minister's Overarching Scheme for Holistic Nutrition or POSHAN Abhiyaan or National Nutrition Mission, is
Government of India's flagship effort to improve maternal and child nutrition outcomes by 2022.
• India launched POSHAN Abhiyaan on 8th March 2018. The contours of the Mission are being updated in 2021.

3. Data and analysis
• Data sources for trends analysis: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16)
and NFHS-5 (2019-20)).
– Child nutrition outcomes: all child data
– Adult nutrition outcomes: man or woman data
– Immediate and underlying determinants: last-child data
– Intervention coverage: last-child data
• Data sources for head count analysis: Census 2011 data to project district-level population of
children under 5 year, women aged 15-49, men aged 15-54 for the year 2019
– Number of pregnant and lactating women at district-level are estimated using HMIS data for the year 2019 and
prevalence from NFHS-5 factsheet
• All the indicators are mapped to the POSHAN Abhiyaan monitoring framework
• Descriptive statistics were estimated, and trend analysis was conducted to examine changes in
outcomes, determinants, and coverage of interventions across the three time periods (2005-06,
2015-16 and 2019-20)
• District level headcount of undernutrition outcomes was computed using undernutrition prevalence
and projected population data for 2019
Note: NFHS-5 data source: Factsheets and state reports for 22 states/UTs
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage

4. MORTALITY & NUTRITION OUTCOMES

5. Infant & child mortality rates in Bihar, per 1,000 live births
(2005-06, 2015-16 & 2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
40 37 35 62 48* 47 85 58* 56
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005-06 2015-16 2019-20 2005-06 2015-16 2019-20 2005-06 2015-16 2019-20
Neonatal mortality rate Infant mortality rate Under-five mortality rate
Mortality
rate
(per
1000)
Bihar 2005-06 Bihar 2015-16 Bihar 2019-20 India average
*p<0.05, difference between 2005-06 and 2015-16 at the state level
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets (2019-20)

6. Trends in undernutrition outcomes in Bihar
(2005-06, 2015-16 & 2019-20)
Undernutrition among children <5y Undernutrition among women (15-49y)
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets (2019-20)
1In NFHS-3, 83.8% of data was missing, while 38.7% of data was missing in NFHS-4.
2NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the specified NFHS round
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
128 114* 2NA 55 48* 43 28 21* 23 9 8 9 57 44* 41 78 64* 69 45 30* 26 68 60* 64 60 58 63
0
20
40
60
80
100
Low birth weight Stunting Wasting Severe wasting Underweight Anemia Underweight Anemia
(non-pregnant)
Anemia
(pregnant)
%
Bihar 2005-06 Bihar 2015-16 Bihar 2019-20 India average
*p<0.05, difference between 2005-06 and 2015-16 at the state level

7. Inter-district variability in undernutrition outcomes in
Bihar (2019-20)
Source: NFHS-5 state & district factsheets (2019-20)
Undernutrition among children
<5y
Undernutrition among women
(15-49y)
District average 2019-20
State average 2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
43 23 9 41 69 26 64 63
0
20
40
60
80
100
Stunting Wasting Severe wasting Underweight Anemia Underweight Anemia
(non pregnant)
Anemia
(pregnant)
%

8. Trends in overweight/obesity & non-communicable diseases
in Bihar (2005-06, 2015-16 & 2019-20)
1NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the specified NFHS round.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
0 2*
2 5 12* 16 6 13* 15 1NA 8 12 1NA 11 16 1NA 4 6 1NA 7 8
0
20
40
60
80
100
Overweight/ obesity
child
Overweight/ obesity
women
Overweight/ obesity
men
High blood pressure
women
High blood pressure
men
High sugar level
women
High sugar level
men
%
Bihar 2005-06 Bihar 2015-16 Bihar 2019-20 India average
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets (2019-20)
*p<0.05, difference between 2005-06 and 2015-16 at the state level

9. Inter-district variability in overweight/obesity & non-
communicable diseases in Bihar (2019-20)
Note: Data on prevalence of overweight among men not available at district level in NFHS-5 (2019-20). District level information not available in NFHS 3 (2005-06).
Source: NFHS-5 state & district factsheets (2019-20)
District average 2019-20
State average 2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2 16 15 12 16 6 8
0
20
40
60
80
100
Overweight/
obesity
child
Overweight/
obesity
women
Overweight/
obesity
men
High blood
pressure
women
High blood
pressure
men
High sugar level
women
High sugar level
men
%

10. Stunting among children <5 years in Bihar (2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 48%
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: Stunting prevalence ≥30% is considered to be very high for public health significance. Source: de Onis et al. (2018)
Prevalence in state = 43%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Sheohar -20.3 6 Nalanda -9.5
2 Khagaria -14.8 7 Kaimur -9.3
3 Vaishali -14.0 8 Jehanabad -8.6
4 Munger -10.7 9 Kishanganj -8.2
5 Purnia -9.7 10 Madhepura -8.1
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).

11. Number of stunted children <5 years in Bihar (2019-20)
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and
projected population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Stunted
children
(number)
1 Purba Champaran 381,534
2 Gaya 283,396
3 Muzaffarpur 279,824
4 Sitamarhi 277,649
5 Samastipur 274,258
6 Madhubani 269,930
7 Pashchim Champaran 255,410
8 Darbhanga 255,374
9 Patna 250,106
10 Araria 224,391
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2019-20

12. Wasting among children <5 years in Bihar (2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 21% Prevalence in state = 23%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Sheikhpura -13.5 6 Bhagalpur -4.1
2 Jamui -9.4 7 Nawada -3.5
3 Pashchim Champaran -8.2 8 Patna -3.1
4 Saharsa -4.8 9 Madhubani -2.4
5 Madhepura -4.2 10 Gaya -1.9
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: Wasting prevalence ≥15% is considered to be very high for public health significance. Source: de Onis et al. (2018).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).

13. Number of wasted children <5 years in Bihar (2019-20)
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Wasted
children
(number)
1 Patna 199,360
2 Saran 148,293
3 Gaya 145,285
4 Samastipur 132,766
5 Purnia 132,549
6 Muzaffarpur 130,716
7 Purba Champaran 130,545
8 Rohtas 122,059
9 Katihar 114,061
10 Aurangabad 113,634
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and
projected population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2019-20
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands

14. Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).
Severe wasting among children <5 years in Bihar
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 8% Prevalence in state = 9%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Sheikhpura -4.6 6 Madhepura -3.5
2 Arwal -4.1 7 Kishanganj -3.3
3 Saharsa -4.1 8 Pashchim Champaran -2.5
4 Araria -4.0 9 Bhagalpur -2.4
5 Patna -3.8 10 Jamui -2.4
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage

15. Number of severely wasted children <5 years in Bihar (2019-20)
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Wasted
children
(number)
1 Patna 76,844
2 Rohtas 69,090
3 Aurangabad 63,897
4 Gaya 55,603
5 Muzaffarpur 53,206
6 Saran 51,491
7 Samastipur 49,242
8 Nalanda 48,078
9 Bhojpur 44,804
10 Purba Champaran 44,292
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and projected
population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands

16. Underweight children <5 years in Bihar (2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 44% Prevalence in state = 41%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Sheikhpura -14.5 6 Pashchim Champaran -8.5
2 Gaya -11.9 7 Sitamarhi -8.0
3 Madhubani -11.5 8 Madhepura -7.2
4 Jamui -10.7 9 Muzaffarpur -6.8
5 Nawada -8.7 10 Khagaria -6.8
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: Underweight prevalence ≥30% is considered to be very high for public health significance (used similar cut-off as stunting). Source: de Onis et al. (2018).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).

17. Number of underweight children <5 years in Bihar (2019-20)
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Underweight
children
(number)
1 Purba Champaran 294,504
2 Patna 287,078
3 Samastipur 266,779
4 Gaya 260,079
5 Purnia 241,980
6 Katihar 233,460
7 Saran 231,708
8 Muzaffarpur 227,932
9 Madhubani 224,422
10 Darbhanga 220,499
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and projected
population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2019-20
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands

18. Anemia among children <5 years in Bihar (2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 64% Prevalence in state = 69%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Supaul -8.9 6 Pashchim Champaran -0.7
2 Gopalganj -8.2 7 Jehanabad -0.6
3 Purba Champaran -4.7 8 Darbhanga -0.5
4 Bhojpur -3.5 9 Purnia 0.7
5 Arwal -1.4 10 Siwan 0.9
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: Anemia prevalence ≥40% is considered to be a severe public health problem. Source: WHO (2011).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).

19. Number of anemic children <5 years in Bihar (2019-20)
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Anemic
children
(number)
1 Patna 425,899
2 Purba Champaran 425,799
3 Gaya 411,941
4 Madhubani 397,599
5 Muzaffarpur 381,181
6 Samastipur 376,271
7 Darbhanga 348,147
8 Vaishali 326,352
9 Pashchim Champaran 324,903
10 Saran 322,855
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and
projected population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2019-20
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands

20. Underweight women, 15-49 years in Bihar (2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 30% Prevalence in state = 26%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Sheohar -12.8 6 Araria -7.6
2 Sheikhpura -11.4 7 Supaul -7.6
3 Gaya -9.4 8 Purnia -7.1
4 Banka -8.0 9 Nalanda -7.0
5 Muzaffarpur -7.7 10 Madhubani -7.0
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: Underweight prevalence ≥40% is considered as very high prevalence. Source: WHO (1995)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).

21. Number of underweight women, 15-49 years in Bihar
(2019-20)
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Underweight
women
(number)
1 Patna 414,951
2 Muzaffarpur 354,837
3 Gaya 351,821
4 Purba Champaran 336,661
5 Madhubani 331,917
6 Samastipur 327,198
7 Sitamarhi 305,663
8 Purnia 294,538
9 Darbhanga 293,595
10 Pashchim Champaran 276,035
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and
projected population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2019-20
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands

22. Anemia among non-pregnant women, 15-49 years in Bihar
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 60% Prevalence in state = 64%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Pashchim Champaran -8.1 6 Purnia -3.3
2 Supaul -7.6 7 Kishanganj -3.0
3 Siwan -7.2 8 Banka -1.3
4 Gopalganj -5.3 9 Khagaria -1
5 Darbhanga -5.1 10 Madhubani -0.8
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district and state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: Anemia prevalence ≥40% is considered to be a severe public health problem. Source: WHO (2011).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).

23. Number of non-pregnant anemic women, 15-49 years in Bihar
(2019-20)
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Anemic non-
pregnant women
(number)
1 Patna 1,235,673
2 Gaya 844,108
3 Muzaffarpur 826,544
4 Purba Champaran 821,511
5 Madhubani 805,328
6 Saran 749,690
7 Samastipur 734,051
8 Darbhanga 703,022
9 Bhagalpur 646,964
10 Vaishali 632,270
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and
projected population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2019-20
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands

24. Anemia among pregnant women, 15-49 years in Bihar
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
2015-16 2019-20
Prevalence in state = 58% Prevalence in state = 63%
Top 10 districts with highest reduction in prevalence between 2015-16 & 2019-20
District Change (pp) District Change (pp)
1 Rohtas -16.2 6 Sitamarhi -7.6
2 Darbhanga -9.8 7 Gaya -3.7
3 Siwan -9.0 8 Pashchim Champaran -2.6
4 Sheohar -8.7 9 Kaimur -1.9
5 Supaul -7.8 10 Aurangabad -1.9
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: : Anemia prevalence ≥40% is considered to be a severe public health problem. Source: WHO (2011).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note: The unit of the numbers in the maps above is percentage (%).

25. Number of pregnant anemic women, 15-49 years in Bihar
(2019-20)
Top 10 districts with highest burden
District
Anemic
pregnant
women
(number)
1 Patna 110,090
2 Purba Champaran 105,464
3 Samastipur 96,448
4 Muzaffarpur 96,354
5 Pashchim Champaran 95,483
6 Purnia 90,237
7 Madhubani 89,164
8 Gaya 85,146
9 Araria 81,811
10 Vaishali 81,473
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and
projected population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 14,700,960, pregnant women 15-49 years is 3,408,592, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 27,254,036.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2019-20
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands

26. NUTRITION DETERMINANTS

27. Mixed picture on infant feeding: Early initiation of breastfeeding improved between 2006 and 2016 but worsened between 2016 and 2020;
improvements were observed in other IYCF practices between 2016 and 2020. Steady decline observed in mothers with low BMI between 2006 and
2020. Consistent improvement in consumption of IFA for 100+ days and adequate diet, but their prevalence is still very low.
Trends in immediate determinants in Bihar
(2005-06, 2015-16 & 2019-20)
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheet (2019-20)
Note: Data on continued breastfeeding at 2 years, egg and/or flesh foods consumption, sweet beverage consumption, and bottle feeding of infants not available in NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)/state report
0Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
(%)

28. Inter-district variability in immediate determinants in Bihar
(2019-20)
District average 2019-20
State average 2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Source: NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note: Data on continued breastfeeding at 2 years not available in NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)
1NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the NFHS-5 state and district factsheets (2019-20)
31 59 39 1NA 11 1NA 1NA 1NA 26 18 14 4
0
20
40
60
80
100 Early
initiation
of
breastfeeding
Exclusive
breastfeeding
Timely
introduction
of
complementary
foods
Continued
breastfeeding
at
2
years
Adequate
diet
Egg
and/or
flesh
food
consumption,
6–23m
Sweet
beverage
consumption,
6–23
m
Bottle
feeding
of
infants,
0–23
m
Women
with
body
mass
index
<18.5
kg/m2
Consumed
IFA
100+
days
Diarrhea
in
the
last
two
weeks
ARI
in
the
last
two
weeks
%

29. Trends in underlying determinants in Bihar
(2005-06, 2015-16 & 2019-20)
All underlying determinants improved steadily between 2006 and 2016/2020. Large improvement in households with electricity and with improved
sanitation facility between 2016 and 2020. Women level factors such as education and early marriage improved between 2006 and 2020, but they still
require special attention, especially women education, which remains low.
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets and state reports (2019-20)
Note 1: Safe disposal of feces not available in NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)/state report and data on HHs with hand washing facility not available in NFHS-3 (2005-06) and NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)/state report. Data on open defecation and HHs
with BPL card for 2019-2020 are taken from NFHS-5 state reports.
Note 2: Several of these determinants are applicable for maternal undernutrition as well
0Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
(%)

30. Inter-district variability in underlying determinants in Bihar
(2019-20)
District average 2019-20
State average 2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Source: NFHS-5 district and state factsheets (2019-20)
Note 1: Several of these determinants are applicable for maternal undernutrition as well
1NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)
58 29 41 11 99 49 1NA 1NA 1NA 1NA 96
0
20
40
60
80
100
Women
who are
literate
Women
with ≥10
years
education
Girls 20-24
years
married
before age
of 18 years
Women 15-
19 years
with child or
pregnant
HHs with
improved
drinking
water
source
HHs with
improved
sanitation
facility
HHs with
hand
washing
facility
Open
defecation
Safe
disposal of
feces
HHs with
BPL card
HHs with
electricity
%

31. COVERAGE OF NUTRITION INTERVENTIONS

32. Trends in coverage of
interventions in Bihar across
the first 1000 days
(2005-06, 2015-16 & 2019-20)
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets and state reports (2019-20).
Note: Interventions’ coverage is based on the last child data.
0Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly from NFHS-5.
Note 1: Data missing for 2019-20 is not available in the NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20). Information on use of bed nets during
pregnancy not available in NFHS-3 data (2005-06).
Note 2: Data on food supplementation and health and nutrition education during pregnancy and post-natal care, and
weight measurement during childhood and counselling on child growth for 2019-20 are taken from NFHS-5 state reports.
Note 3: Refer to district dashboard for the inter-district variability in the coverage of interventions.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
(%)
Pregnancy: Large improvements in received MCP card (87pp) from 2006
to 2020, with 90% coverage in 2020. Modest improvements in at least 4
ANC, ANC in first trimester, food supplementation, and health and
nutrition education from 2006 to 2020 (14-43pp), however, coverage
remained <55%.
Delivery and Postnatal: Large improvements in institutional birth and
skilled birth attendance from 2006 to 2020 (48-55pp). Despite
considerable improvements in provision of postnatal care for mothers
and babies, food supplementation, and health and nutrition education
from 2006 to 2020 (32-59pp), coverage remained <60%.
Early Childhood: Considerable improvement in provision of full
immunization (39pp) from 2006 to 2020, with coverage >70% in 2020.
Coverage of most services remained low, despite large improvements
from 2006 to 2020; Zinc and child weighing provision was <40% in 2020.

33. Coverage of nutrition related interventions in Bihar: district
dashboard (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note 1: Data missing for 2019-20 is not available in the NFHS-5 factsheets and state reports (2019-20).
Source: NFHS-5 district factsheets and state reports (2019-2020)

34. 1NA 1NA 1NA 1NA
0
20
40
60
80
100
Overweight/
obesity
child
Overweight/
obesity
women
Overweight/
obesity
men
High blood
pressure
women
High blood
pressure
men
High sugar
level
women
High sugar
level
men
%
2005-06 2015-16 2019-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Stunting Wasting Severe wasting Underweight
child
Anemia
child
Underweight
women
Anemia
Non pregnant
women
Anemia
Pregnant
women
%
2019-20 2015-16 2005-06
Children: Stunting and wasting prevalence declined by 7 percentage points (pp)
from 2006 to 2016; stunting continued to decline by 5pp but wasting increased by
2pp from 2016 to 2020. Underweight declined by 13pp from 2006 to 2016 and
continued to decline by 3pp from 2016 to 2020. Anemia declined by 14pp from
2006 to 2016 but increased by 5pp from 2016 to 2020.
Women: Underweight declined by 15 pp from 2006 to 2016 and continued to
decline by 4pp from 2016 to 2020. Anemia in non-pregnant and pregnant women
declined by 8pp and 2pp, respectively, from 2006 to 2016, but increased by 4-5pp
among both groups of women from 2016 to 2020. Overweight/obesity increased
by 7pp from 2006 to 2016 and continued to increase by 4pp from 2016 to 2020.
Men: Overweight/obesity increased by 7pp from 2006 to 2016 and continued to
increase by 2pp from 2016 to 2020.
Attention is needed to improve (%s in 2020):
• Outcomes: Stunting (43%) and anemia in children (69%); anemia in non-
pregnant (64%) and pregnant (63%) women
• Immediate determinants: Early initiation of breastfeeding (31%); adequate diet
(11%); 100+ IFA (18%)
• Underlying determinants: Women with 10 years education (29%); households
with improved sanitation (49%)
• Coverage of interventions: 4 ANC visits (25%), food supplementation (42-44%),
and health and nutrition education for women (32-35%); growth monitoring of
children (35%)
Trends in nutrition outcomes, determinants and coverage of interventions in Bihar (2005-06, 2015-16 and 2019-20)
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets and state reports
(2019-20)
1NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the specified NFHS round
0Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
Undernutrition outcomes Overweight/obesity and non communicable diseases
Immediate determinants Key takeaways
Underlying determinants
Interventions across the first 1000 days
(%)
(%)
(%)

35. Annex: Methodological notes
• Nutrition outcomes, their immediate and underlying determinants, and nutrition related interventions were identified following the Poshan Abhiyaan
monitoring framework.
• The selected indicators were harmonized across the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) 3 (2005-06) and 4 (2015-16) data and NFHS 5 factsheets (2019).
For those indicators that were not comparable, details were specified in a footnote.
• The method of women sampling across the three NFHS rounds was compared:
• Descriptive statistics were estimated, and trend analysis was conducted to examine changes in outcomes, determinants, and coverage of interventions
across the three time periods. Further, top 10 districts with the highest change in prevalence between 2016 & 2019 were identified. Statistical software Stata
16.0 and R were used to perform the analyses.
• District level headcount of undernutrition outcomes was computed using undernutrition prevalence and projected population data for the year 2019.
o The prevalence P was calculated as children/women with nutritional deficit (q) divided by the eligible sample of children/women (n) in the district (j) and expressed in percentage as: Pj= (qj/nj)
×100
o The headcount was calculated as the product of P and the total eligible population N for each district: Hj= Pj×Nj
• Findings were visualized using spatial maps, bar graphs and line plots. The maps and other graphs were prepared on R and Excel, respectively.
• Cut-off values for public health significance were based on WHO guidelines on all indicators
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332223/9789241516952-eng.pdf?ua=1 except severe wasting (based on agreement with UNICEF)
NFHS – 3 (2005-2006) NFHS-4 (2015-2016) NFHS-5 (2019-2020)
• Target sample size in NFHS-3 was fixed
in terms of ever married women age
15-49 years
• All eligible women age 15-49 i.e. all
women age 15-49 who are usual
members of the selected households
or who spent the night before the
survey in the selected households
were eligible to be interviewed in the
survey.
• Information on sampling strategy not
available yet

36. Annex: Indicator definitions
Mortality and nutrition outcomes
Neonatal mortality rate Neonatal mortality rate per 1000 live births
Infant mortality rate Infant mortality rate per 1000 live births
Under-five mortality rate Under-five mortality rate (U5MR) per 1000 live births
Low birth weight Percentage of live births in the five years preceding the survey with a reported birth weight less than 2.5 kg, based on either a written record or the mother's recall
Stunting among children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are stunted i.e. height-for-age z score < -2SD
Wasting among children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are wasted i.e. weight-for-height z score < -2SD
Severe wasting among children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are wasted i.e. weight-for-height z score < -3SD
Underweight children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are underweight i.e. weight-for-age z score < -2SD
Anemia among children Percentage of children age 6-59 months who are anemic i.e. (Hb <11.0 g/dl)
Underweight women Percentage of women age 15-49 whose Body Mass Index (BMI) is below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m2)
Anemia among non-pregnant women Percentage of non-pregnant women age 15-49 who are anemic (<12.0 g/dl)
Anemia among pregnant women Percentage of pregnant women age 15-49 who are anemic (<11.0 g/dl)
Overweight/obesity - children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are overweight i.e. weight-for-height z score > 2SD
Overweight/obesity - women Percentage of men age 15-54 who are overweight or obese (BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2)
Overweight/obesity - men Percentage of men age 15-54 who are overweight or obese (BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2)
High blood pressure among women^ Percentage of women age 15-49 with elevated blood pressure (Systolic >140 mm Hg or diastolic >90 mm Hg)
High blood pressure among men^ Percentage of men age 15-54 with elevated blood pressure (Systolic >140 mm Hg or diastolic >90 mm Hg)
High sugar level among women^ Percentage of women age 15-49 with elevated blood pressure (Systolic >140 mm Hg or diastolic >90 mm Hg)
High sugar level among men^ Percentage of men age 15-54 with high blood sugar levels (141-160 mg/dl)
^ Indicator not available in NFHS-3; $ Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets/state reports; 0 Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet

37. Annex: Indicator definitions
^ Indicator not available in NFHS-3; $ Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets/state reports; 0 Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet
Immediate determinants
Early initiation of breastfeeding Percentage of children under age 3 years breastfed within one hour of birth for the last child born in the 3 years before the survey
Exclusive breastfeeding Percentage of youngest children under age 6 months living with mother who were exclusively breastfed
Timely introduction of
complementary foods0
1Percentage of youngest children age 6-8 months living with mother who received solid or semi-solid food; 2Percentage of youngest children age 6-8 months
living with mother who received solid or semi-solid food and breastmilk
Continued breastfeeding at 2 years$ Percentage of youngest children 12–23 months of age who were fed breast milk during the previous day
Adequate diet0 Percentage of youngest children 6–23 months of age who consumed a minimum acceptable diet during the previous day
Eggs and/or flesh foods
consumption$
Percentage of youngest children 6–23 months of age who consumed egg and/or flesh food during the previous day
Sweet beverage$ Percentage of youngest children 6–23 months of age who consumed a sweet beverage during the previous day
Bottle feeding for infants$ Percentage of youngest children 0–23 months of age who were fed from a bottle with a nipple during the previous day
Women with body mass index <18.5
kg/m2 0
1Percentage of women age 15-49 with a youngest child < 5 years who have BMI below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) ; 2Percentage of women age 15-49 whose BMI
is below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m2)
Consumed IFA 100+ days Percentage of mothers age 15-49 who consumed iron folic acid for 100 days or more during the last pregnancy in last five years preceding the survey
Diarrhea in the last two weeks0 1Percentage of youngest children under age five who had diarrhoea in the two weeks preceding the survey; 2Percentage of children under age 5 who had
diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey
ARI in the last two weeks0 1Percentage of youngest children under age five who had symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) in the two weeks preceding the survey; 2Percentage of
children under age five who had symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) in the two weeks preceding the survey

38. Annex: Indicator definitions
^ Indicator not available in NFHS-3; $ Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets/state reports; @Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets but available in NFHS-5 states reports; 0 Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet
Underlying determinants
Women who are literate0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 with a birth in five years preceding the survey who are literate i.e. those who completed standard 6 or higher and can read a
whole sentence; 2Percentage of women age 15-49 who are literate i.e. those who completed standard 9 or higher and can read a whole sentence or part of a
sentence.
Women with ≥10 years education0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 with a birth in five years preceding the survey with 10 or more years of schooling; 2Percentage of women age 15-49 with 10 or
more years of schooling
Girls 20-24 years married before age
of 18 years0
1Percentage of women aged 20-24 years with a birth in five years preceding the survey who were married before age 18 years; 2Percentage of women aged 20-24
years who were married before age 18 years
Women 15-19 years with child or
pregnant
Percentage of currently married women aged 15-49 who had their first birth before age 20 years and in the five years preceding the survey
HHs with improved drinking water
source0
1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that use an improved source of drinking water; 2Population living in households that use an
improved sanitation facility
HHs with improved sanitation facility0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that uses improved toilet facility; 2Population living in households that use an improved sanitation
facility
HHs with hand washing facility^$ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that had soap and water for washing hands
Open defecation@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that has no toilet facility/defecates in open
Safe disposal of feces$ Percentage of youngest children living with mother whose stools were disposed of safely
HHs with BPL card@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in households with BPL card
HHs with electricity0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that has electricity; 2Population living in households with electricity

39. Annex: Indicator definitions
^ Indicator not available in NFHS-3; $ Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets/state reports; 0 Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet; @Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets but available in NFHS-5 state reports
Interventions
Demand for FP satisfied@ Percentage of currently married women age 15-49 with demand for family planning satisfied by modern methods
Iodized salt0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 living in HHs that use iodized salt; 2Percentage of households using iodized salt
Any ANC visits$ Percentage of women age 15-49 with a live birth in the five years who received at least one ANC for the last birth
ANC first trimester Percentage of women (15-49 years of age) attended by any provider during the first trimester of pregnancy that led to the birth of the youngest child in the last 2
years
≥ 4ANC Percentage of mothers age 15-49 who had at least 4 antenatal care visits for last birth in the 5 years before the survey
Received MCP card Percentage of mothers who registered last pregnancy in the 5 years preceding the survey for which she received a Mother and Child Protection (MCP) card
Received IFA tab/syrup@ Percentage of women who received IFA (given or purchased) tablets during the pregnancy for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey
Tetanus injection Percentage of women whose last birth was protected against neonatal tetanus (for last birth in the five years preceding the survey )
Deworming- pregnancy@ Percentage of women who took an intestinal parasite drug during the pregnancy for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey
Weighing- pregnancy@ Percentage of women age 15-49 with a live birth in the five years preceding the survey who were weighed during ANC for the last birth
Birth preparedness counselling$ Percentage of women who had at least one contact with a health worker in the three months preceding the survey and were counselled on birth preparedness;
calculated among women age 15-49 who gave birth in the five years preceding the survey
Breastfeeding counselling@ Percentage of women who met with a community health worker in the last three months of pregnancy and received advice on breastfeeding (for the last
pregnancy in the five years preceding the survey)
Counselling on keeping baby warm@ Percentage of women who met with a community health worker in the last three months of pregnancy and received advice on keeping the baby warm for their
most recent live birth in the five years preceding the survey
Cord care counselling^@ Percentage of women who met with a community health worker in the last three months of pregnancy and received advice on cord care for their most recent live
birth in the five years preceding the survey
Food supplementation - pregnancy@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received supplementary food from AWC during pregnancy
Health & nutrition education –
pregnancy@
Percentage of mothers who received health and nutrition education from an Anganwadi Centre (AWC) during last pregnancy in the five years preceding the survey
Malaria prevention- use of bed nets^$ Percentage of women who used mosquito net during the pregnancy for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey

40. Annex: Indicator definitions
^ Indicator not available in NFHS-3; $ Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets/state reports; 0 Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet; @Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets but available in NFHS-5 state reports
Interventions
Institutional birth0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 who gave birth in health/institutional facility for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey;
2Percentage of live births to women age 15-49 in the five years preceding the survey that took place in a health/institutional facility
Financial assistance (JSY)@ Percentage of women who received financial assistance under JSY for their most recent live birth that took place in institutional facility in the 5 years
preceding the survey
Skilled birth attendant0 1Percentage of women whose last delivery was attended by a skilled health personnel for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey;
2Percentage of births attended by skilled health personnel for births in the 5 years before the survey
Postnatal care for mothers Percentage of mothers who received postnatal care from a doctor/nurse/LHV/ANM/midwife/other health personnel within 2 days of delivery for their
most recent live birth in the five years preceding the survey
Postnatal care for babies Percentage of children who received postnatal care from a doctor /nurse /LHV /ANM /midwife /other health personnel within 2 days of delivery for last
birth in the 5 years before the survey
Food supplementation – postnatal@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received supplementary food from AWC while breastfeeding
Health & nutrition education – postnatal@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received health check-ups from AWC while breastfeeding
Full immunization0 1Percentage of youngest living children age 12-23 months fully vaccinated based on information from either vaccination card or mother's recall;
2Percentage of children age 12-23 months fully vaccinated based on information from either vaccination card or mother's recall
Vitamin A – early childhood0 1Percentage of youngest children age 6-59 months who received Vitamin A supplementation in the last 6 months preceding the survey; 2 Percentage of
children age 9-35 months who received a vitamin A dose in the last 6 months
Pediatric IFA0@ Percentage of youngest children age 6-59 months who received iron supplements in the past 7 days preceding the survey
Deworming – early childhood0@ Percentage of youngest children age 6-59 months who received deworming tablets in the last 6 months preceding the survey
Care seeking for ARI0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 years with fever or symptoms of ARI in the 2 weeks preceding the survey taken to a health facility or health
provider; 2Percentage of children under age 5 years with fever or symptoms of ARI in the 2 weeks preceding the survey taken to a health facility or health
provider
ORS during diarrhea0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who received oral rehydration salts (ORS);
2Percentage of children under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who ORS
Zinc during diarrhea0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who received zinc; 2Percentage of children
under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who received zinc
Food supplementation (children 6-35
months)$
Percentage of youngest children age 6-35 months who received food supplements from AWC in the 12 months preceding the survey
Weighing – early childhood@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 who were weighed at AWC in the 12 months preceding the survey
Counselling on child growth@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received counselling from an AWC after child was weighed in the 12 months preceding the
survey