Improving nutrition in Telangana:Trends in outcomes, determinants and interventions between 2006 and 2020

Improving nutrition in Telangana
Trends in outcomes, determinants and interventions
between 2016 and 2020
VERSION: Sep 23, 2021
This slide deck is an evolving work in progress, with updates being made frequently. If you want to use or
cite this, please email us at IFPRI-POSHAN@cgiar.org to receive the most updated version

Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
2014 (6 mo): New
administration
established);
Nutrition community
develops LAA 2014
2015: NITI Aayog
established; Policy
priorities: Digital
India, Aadhar,
Sanitation Mission;
nutrition still a
“learning agenda”.
Other social welfare
programs reviewed
(e.g., NREGA)
2016: Stated policy
priorities
implemented.
Nutrition mission
inputs received from
multiple groups; July
finance ministry
meeting on nutrition
2017: Final nutrition
strategy unveiled by
NITI Aayog in
September;
acknowledges
underlying issues
(poverty, etc.) but
actions still focused
on ICDS-health
programs
2018: Nutrition
Mission launched in
March – strong ICDS-
Health-Sanitation
link. Poverty/food
insecurity still not
central to agenda
2019: Election year.
Nutrition Mission
strongly visible and
implemented (focus
on BCC, awareness);
poverty alleviation
not part of nutrition
agenda
2021: Mission
POSHAN 2.0
launched in Union
Budget 2021 to
improve nutritional
outcomes.
Nutrition on India’s policy agenda
• The Prime Minister's Overarching Scheme for Holistic Nutrition or POSHAN Abhiyaan or National Nutrition Mission, is
Government of India's flagship effort to improve maternal and child nutrition outcomes by 2022.
• India launched POSHAN Abhiyaan on 8th March 2018. The contours of the Mission are being updated in 2021.

Data and analysis
• Data sources for trends analysis: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4 (2015-16) and NFHS-5
(2019-20)). As Telangana was formed in the year 2014, its data was not available in the NFHS-3
(2005-06).
– Child nutrition outcomes: all child data
– Adult nutrition outcomes: man or woman data
– Immediate and underlying determinants: last-child data
– Intervention coverage: last-child data
• Data sources for head count analysis: Census 2011 data to project district-level population of
children under 5 year, women aged 15-49, men aged 15-54 for the year 2019
– Number of pregnant and lactating women at district-level are estimated using HMIS data for the year 2019 and
prevalence from NFHS-5 factsheet
• All the indicators are mapped to the POSHAN Abhiyaan monitoring framework
• Descriptive statistics were estimated, and trend analysis was conducted to examine changes in
outcomes, determinants, and coverage of interventions across the two time periods (2015-16 and
2019-20)
• District level headcount of undernutrition outcomes was computed using undernutrition prevalence
and projected population data for 2019
Note: NFHS-5 data source: Factsheets for 22 states/UTs
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage

MORTALITY & NUTRITION OUTCOMES

Infant & child mortality rates in Telangana, per 1,000 live
births (2015-16 & 2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Telangana 2015-16 Telangana 2019-20
20 17 28 26 32 29
0
20
40
60
80
100
2015-16 2019-20 2015-16 2019-20 2015-16 2019-20
Neonatal mortality rate Infant mortality rate Under-five mortality rate
Mortality
rate
(per
1000)
India average
Note: Telangana state was formed in 2014, therefore NFHS 3 (2005-06) data is not available for the state.
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets (2019-20)

Trends in undernutrition outcomes in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
1In NFHS-4, 3.7% of data was missing.
2NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the specified NFHS round
Note: Telangana was formed in 2014, therefore there is no data for the state in NFHS 3 (2005-06).
Undernutrition among children <5y Undernutrition among women (15-49y)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
116 2NA 28 33 17 22 5 9 28 32 61 70 23 19 57 58 48 53
0
20
40
60
80
100
Low birth weight Stunting Wasting Severe wasting Underweight Anemia Underweight Anemia
(non-pregnant)
Anemia
(pregnant)
%
Telangana 2015-16 Telangana 2019-20 India average

Inter-district variability in undernutrition outcomes in
Telangana (2019-20)
Source: NFHS-5 state & district factsheets (2019-20)
Undernutrition among children
<5y
Undernutrition among women
(15-49y)
District average 2019-20
State average 2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
33 22 9 32 70 19 58 53
0
20
40
60
80
100
Stunting Wasting Severe wasting Underweight Anemia Underweight Anemia
(non pregnant)
Anemia
(pregnant)
%

Trends in overweight/obesity & non-communicable diseases
in Telangana (2015-16 & 2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
1 3 29 30 24 32 12 20 19 27 7 6 8 7
0
20
40
60
80
100
Overweight/ obesity
child
Overweight/ obesity
women
Overweight/ obesity
men
High blood pressure
women
High blood pressure
men
High sugar level
women
High sugar level
men
%
Telangana 2015-16 Telangana 2019-20 India average

Inter-district variability in overweight/obesity & non-
communicable diseases in Telangana (2019-20)
Source: NFHS-5 state & district factsheets (2019-20)
Note1: Data on prevalence of overweight among men not available at district level in NFHS-5 (2019-20).
Note2: Telangana was formed in 2014, so there is no data for that state in NFHS 3 (2005-06).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
3 30 32 20 27 6 7
0
20
40
60
80
100
Overweight/
obesity
child
Overweight/
obesity
women
Overweight/
obesity
men
High blood
pressure
women
High blood
pressure
men
High sugar level
women
High sugar level
men
%

Stunting among children <5 years in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
Note 1: Stunting prevalence ≥30% is considered to be very high for public health significance. Source: de Onis et al. (2018).
Note 2: Only Hyderabad district comparable between 2015-16 and 2019-20.
Districts with highest reduction in prevalence
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Change (pp)
1 Nizamabad -4.47
2 Khammam -1.17
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 27.8 33.1
Adilabad 39.3 45.7
Hyderabad 17.7 30.4
Karimnagar 26.7 30.3
Khammam 23.4 22.2
Mahbubnagar 34.2 42.6
Medak 30.4 36.4
Nalgonda 29.7 31.7
Nizamabad 35.0 30.5
Ranga Reddy 26.5 37.8
Note: The unit of the numbers in the figure above is percentage (%).

Number of stunted children <5 years in Telangana (2019-20)
Source: IFPRI estimates - The headcount was calculated as the product of the undernutrition prevalence and the total eligible projected population for each district in 2019. Prevalence estimates were obtained from NFHS 5 (2019-20) and projected
population for 2019 was estimated using Census 2011.
Note: The total number of children <5 years is 2,754,280, pregnant women 15-49 years is 770,426, and non-pregnant women 15-49 years is 9,996,449.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Stunted
children
(number)
District Stunted
children
(number)
1 Ranga Reddy 173073 6 Nalgonda 82549
2 Mahbubnagar 155653 7 Karimnagar 71311
3 Hyderabad 102126 8 Nizamabad 61087
4 Adilabad 98116 9 Khammam 43981
5 Medak 94749
Note: The unit of the numbers in the map above is thousands
Top districts with highest burden
2019-20

Wasting among children <5 years in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Note 1: Wasting prevalence ≥15% is considered to be very high for public health significance. Source: de Onis et al. (2018).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
1 Karimnagar -4.67
2 Ranga Reddy -1.2
3 Mahbubnagar -1.18
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 17.1 21.7
Adilabad 21.5 29.5
Hyderabad 12.3 17.7
Khammam 11.2 24.7
Medak 20.1 21.3
Nalgonda 23.1 29.8
Nizamabad 21.2 26.2

Number of wasted children <5 years in Telangana (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Wasted
children
(number)
District Wasted
children
(number)
1 Nalgonda 77602 6 Medak 55444
2 Mahbubnagar 65038 7 Nizamabad 52475
3 Ranga Reddy 63643 8 Khammam 48934
4 Adilabad 63335 9 Karimnagar 32714
5 Hyderabad 59462
2019-20

Severe wasting among children <5 years in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Note: Only Hyderabad district comparable between 2015-16 and 2019-20.
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
1 Karimnagar -1.44
2 Medak -1.37
3 Nizamabad -1.35
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 4.9 8.5
Adilabad 5.7 12.9
Hyderabad 3.3 8.0
Karimnagar 6.2 4.8
Khammam 3.4 15.0
Mahbubnagar 5.9 8.7
Medak 4.9 3.5
Nalgonda 6.7 14.5
Nizamabad 5.7 4.3
Ranga Reddy 3.4 5.1

Number of severely wasted children <5 years in Telangana
(2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Severely wasted
children
(number)
District Severely
wasted
children
(number)
1 Nalgonda 37759 6 Ranga Reddy 23351
3 Khammam 29717 8 Medak 9111
4 Adilabad 27696 9 Nizamabad 8612
5 Hyderabad 26875
2019-20

Underweight children <5 years in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Note 1: Underweight prevalence ≥30% is considered to be very high for public health significance (used similar cut-off as stunting). Source: de Onis et al. (2018).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
1 Nalgonda -5.92
2 Mahbubnagar -0.36
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 28.4 31.8
Adilabad 35.9 52.0
Hyderabad 16.7 18.9
Khammam 21.1 26.2
Medak 37.8 42.0
Nalgonda 33.9 28.0
Nizamabad 37.7 38.4

Number of underweight children <5 years in Telangana (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Underweight
children (number)
children
(number)
3 Adilabad 111642 8 Hyderabad 63493
4 Medak 109326 9 Khammam 51906
5 Nizamabad 76910
2019-20

Anemia among children <5 years in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Note 1: Anemia prevalence ≥40% is considered to be a severe public health problem. Source: WHO (2011).
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
1 Khammam -10.74
2 Nizamabad -1.32
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 61.0 70.0
Adilabad 66.9 76.3
Hyderabad 54.3 63.6
Khammam 71.2 60.5
Medak 67.5 70.0
Nalgonda 70.6 74.5
Nizamabad 66.6 65.3

Number of anemic children <5 years in Telangana (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Anemic
children
(number)
District Anemic
children
(number)
1 Ranga Reddy 311768 6 Karimnagar 149683
2 Mahbubnagar 271114 7 Adilabad 147154
3 Hyderabad 191931 8 Nizamabad 117486
4 Nalgonda 174275 9 Khammam 107669
5 Medak 163680
2019-20

Underweight women, 15-49 years in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Note 1: Underweight prevalence ≥40% is considered as very high prevalence. Source: WHO (1995)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
1 Nalgonda -9.33
2 Adilabad -7.84
3 Khammam -7.49
4 Nizamabad -5.35
5 Ranga Reddy -4.32
6 Mahbubnagar -4.28
7 Medak -3.47
8 Karimnagar -2.83
9 Hyderabad -0.57
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 22.9 18.8
Adilabad 34.7 26.9
Hyderabad 13.0 12.4
Khammam 20.3 12.8
Medak 28.9 25.4
Nalgonda 24.8 15.5
Nizamabad 26.4 21.0

Number of underweight women, 15-49 years in Telangana
(2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
women
(number)
women (number)
3 Karimnagar 234382 8 Hyderabad 150587
4 Medak 225217 9 Khammam 111649
5 Adilabad 216810
2019-20

Anemia among non-pregnant women, 15-49 years in
Telangana (2015-16 & 2019-20)
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 district and state factsheets (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
1 Khammam -8.83
2 Medak -3.28
3 Adilabad -2.34
4 Hyderabad -2.13
5 Nalgonda -1.98
6 Ranga Reddy -1.5
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 56.9 57.8
Adilabad 63.4 61.1
Hyderabad 54.6 52.5
Khammam 71.0 62.2
Medak 58.1 54.8
Nalgonda 56.2 54.2
Nizamabad 56.4 57.7

Number of non-pregnant anemic women, 15-49 years in
Telangana (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Non-pregnant
anemic women
(number)
District Non-pregnant
anemic women
(number)
1 Ranga Reddy 866903 6 Khammam 542542
2 Karimnagar 695183 7 Adilabad 492458
3 Hyderabad 637565 8 Medak 485901
5 Nalgonda 556813
2019-20

Anemia among pregnant women, 15-49 years in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
between 2015-16 & 2019-20
1 Adilabad -10.9
2 Mahbubnagar -9.52
3 Nizamabad -7.17
4 Khammam -5.35
2015-16 2019-20
Telangana 48.2 53.2
Adilabad 71.9 61.0
Khammam 74.2 68.8
Nalgonda 57.3 58.3
Nizamabad 46.1 38.9

Number of pregnant anemic women, 15-49 years in
Telangana (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
District Pregnant
anemic women
(number)
District Pregnant
anemic
women
(number)
1 Ranga Reddy 25555 6 Karimnagar 10211
2 Nalgonda 15231 7 Adilabad 8423
3 Khammam 13922
4 Mahbubnagar 12757
5 Nizamabad 11374
2019-20

Prevalence of low BMI among women declined between 2016 and 2020. There was a slight increase in proportion of women consuming IFA during pregnancy
between during this period. Infant feeding interventions did not change considerably between 2016 and 2020, except for timely introduction of complementary
food, which decreased. Morbidity among children remained below 10%.
Trends in immediate determinants in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheet (2019-20)
Note1: Data on continued breastfeeding at 2 years, egg and/or flesh foods consumption, sweet beverage consumption, and bottle feeding of infants not available in NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)/state report
Note 2: Telangana was formed in 2014, therefore there is no data for the state in NFHS 3 (2005-06).
0Indicators of NFHS-4 differ slightly from NFHS-5
(%)

Inter-district variability in immediate determinants in
Telangana (2019-20) District average 2019-20
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Source: NFHS-5 district & state factsheets (2019-20)
1NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the NFHS-5 state and district factsheets (2019-20)
37 68 51 1NA 9 1NA 1NA 1NA 19 58 7 2
0
20
40
60
80
100 Early
initiation
of
breastfeeding
Exclusive
breastfeeding
Timely
introduction
of
complementary
foods
Continued
breastfeeding
at
2
years
Adequate
diet
Egg
and/or
flesh
food
consumption,
6–23m
Sweet
beverage
consumption,
6–23
m
Bottle
feeding
of
infants,
0–23
m
Women
with
body
mass
index
<18.5
kg/m2
Consumed
IFA
100+
days
Diarrhea
in
the
last
two
weeks
ARI
in
the
last
two
weeks
%

Trends in underlying determinants in Telangana
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Mixed trends for underlying determinants between 2016 and 2020. Large improvements in households with improved drinking water sources and
sanitation facilities, and women’s age at marriage. Considerable reduction in proportion of women who are literate and received 10+ years of schooling.
Source: NFHS-4 (2016) & NFHS-5 state factsheets and state reports (2019-20)
Note 1: Safe disposal of feces and HHs with hand washing facility not available in NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)/state report. Data on open defecation and HHs with BPL card for 2019-2020 are taken from NFHS-5 state reports.
Note 2: Several of these determinants are applicable for maternal undernutrition as well
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
(%)

Inter-district variability in underlying determinants in
Telangana (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Source: NFHS-5 district and state factsheets (2019-20)
1NA refers to the unavailability of data for a particular indicator in the NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20)
Note 1: Several of these determinants are applicable for maternal undernutrition as well
67 46 24 6 99 76 1NA 1NA 1NA 1NA 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Women
who are
literate
Women with
≥10 years
education
Girls 20-24
years
married
before age
of 18 years
Women 15-
19 years
with child or
pregnant
HHs with
improved
drinking
water
source
HHs with
improved
sanitation
facility
HHs with
hand
washing
facility
Open
defecation
Safe
disposal of
feces
HHs with
BPL card
HHs with
electricity
%

COVERAGE OF NUTRITION INTERVENTIONS

Trends in coverage of
interventions in Telangana
across the first 1000 days
(2015-16 & 2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Pregnancy: Modest improvements in food supplementation and health
and nutrition education from 2016 to 2020 (17-22pp), with coverage
>75% in 2020. The coverage of at least 4 ANC declined by 5pp during the
same time period.
Delivery and Postnatal: Large improvement in provision of postnatal
care for babies from 2016 to 2020 (65pp), with 90% coverage in 2020.
Modest improvement in food supplementation and health and nutrition
education from 2016 to 2020 (20-26pp).
Early Childhood: Modest improvement in weighing and counselling on
child growth from 2016 to 2020 (20-49pp). Despite slight increase in
coverage, prevalence of ORS and Zinc during diarrhea remained low
(<60%) in 2020. Coverage of Vitamin A and care seeking for ARI declined
slightly (2-3pp) from 2016 to 2020.
Source: NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets and state reports (2019-20).
Note: Interventions’ coverage is based on the last child data.
0Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly from NFHS-5.
Note 1: Data missing for 2019-20 is not available in the NFHS-5 factsheets (2019-20). Information on use of bed nets during
pregnancy not available in NFHS-3 data (2005-06).
Note 2: Data on food supplementation and health and nutrition education during pregnancy and post-natal care, and
weight measurement during childhood and counselling on child growth for 2019-20 are taken from NFHS-5 state reports.
Note 3: Refer to district dashboard for the inter-district variability in the coverage of interventions.
(%)

Coverage of nutrition related interventions in Telangana:
district dashboard (2019-20)
Background
Nutrition
outcomes
Determinants
Intervention
coverage
Note 1: Data missing for 2019-20 is not available in the NFHS-5 factsheets and state reports (2019-20).
Source: NFHS-5 district factsheets and state reports (2019-2020)
District name
Demand
for
FP
satisfied
Iodized
salt
Any
ANC
visits
ANC
first
trimester
≥4
ANC
Received
MCP
card
Received
IFA
tab/syrup
Tetanus
injection
Deworming
Weighing
Birth
preparedness
counselling
Breastfeeding
counselling
Counselling
on
keeping
baby
warm
Cord
care
counselling
Food
supplementation
Health
&
nutrition
education
Malaria
prevention-
use
of
bed
nets
Institutional
birth
Financial
assistance
(JSY)
Skilled
birth
attendant
Postnatal
care
for
mothers
Postnatal
care
for
babies
Food
supplementation
Health
&
nutrition
education
Full
immunization
Vitamin
A
Paediatric
IFA
Deworming
Care
seeking
for
ARI
ORS
during
diarrhea
Zinc
during
diarrhea
Food
supplementation
(6-
35
months)
Weighing
Counselling
on
child
growth
TELANGANA 95.8 88.5 70.4 96.7 90.6 89.6 22.6 97.0 13.3 93.6 87.6 90.0 79.1 72.4 74.8 56.3 38.5
Adilabad 97.6 89.7 74.8 94.1 80.4 90.9 29.7 94.1 13.2 93.9 83.4 80.3 69.3 85.7 75.0 65.0 42.7
Bhadradri Kothagudem 97.7 92.8 70.1 98.6 90.6 91.2 31.9 97.4 18.4 94.2 87.1 85.4 80.4 73.2 82.4
Hyderabad 97.4 87.9 69.9 94.4 90.8 89.6 20.8 98.3 6.7 94.6 91.2 94.9 73.8 62.0
Jagitial 96.5 94.6 81.9 95.5 88.6 87.9 18.3 94.4 19.8 91.9 84.1 89.9 77.7 72.5 73.0
Jangoan 96.8 89.7 65.4 98.9 94.4 86.1 21.7 99.6 5.3 90.1 85.6 96.5 84.2 80.8 81.0
Jayashankar Bhupalapally 97.7 94.6 72.7 94.0 85.1 94.1 24.1 99.5 13.6 95.1 89.1 89.6 87.9 70.5 71.2
Jogulamba Gadwal 85.3 88.3 72.9 96.5 86.6 92.6 21.8 94.2 12.1 91.7 88.3 88.2 86.9 75.0 88.7
Kamareddy 93.6 87.5 79.5 96.8 93.4 90.6 23.6 97.1 18.1 93.2 86.8 89.0 75.5 79.6 72.8
Karimnagar 99.1 92.3 69.6 88.2 91.8 85.2 17.1 98.4 9.9 86.9 89.5 95.9 73.4 79.8 70.3 59.2 36.8
Khammam 96.6 84.9 76.3 99.4 95.1 97.3 30.3 97.9 11.3 93.2 93.2 91.5 86.6 70.9 73.3
Komaram Bheem Asifabad 92.9 80.0 68.8 96.7 92.5 91.8 26.2 82.0 22.9 83.4 85.5 81.9 76.2 75.0 59.2
Mahabubabad 96.2 87.8 67.7 98.1 84.4 94.0 27.6 97.7 5.5 95.4 91.5 94.3 76.1 73.6 79.7
Mahabubnagar 94.1 86.2 62.6 98.7 93.6 90.2 25.9 98.1 14.2 97.6 84.9 85.5 89.4 70.8 81.2
Mancherial 97.7 86.7 64.7 93.6 95.4 89.6 24.5 90.1 9.4 96.9 87.7 85.3 76.0 63.9 67.5
Medak 97.1 78.9 68.5 97.7 89.2 81.3 27.7 98.9 13.5 92.9 80.8 89.8 69.3 85.2 60.1 41.6 37.5
Medchal-Malkajgiri 98.8 89.4 69.6 96.2 90.3 92.2 14.7 98.3 8.9 96.2 90.6 90.1 76.1 69.5 63.8
Nagarkurnool 92.0 92.4 75.1 97.0 86.4 88.5 23.4 98.0 14.7 94.5 90.3 91.0 81.1 64.7 86.6
Nalgonda 87.5 90.5 65.7 98.7 96.1 91.8 28.3 98.3 21.5 99.0 92.2 95.3 78.3 72.6 76.7
Nirmal 95.1 85.2 69.7 96.9 87.2 91.2 24.6 96.7 10.0 91.6 87.2 91.0 75.3 84.1 56.3
Nizamabad 96.9 87.9 78.5 96.2 90.0 80.0 22.6 97.3 12.1 91.8 79.5 85.9 86.1 83.0 67.0 56.6 42.2
Peddapalli 97.8 83.5 77.9 92.9 88.4 87.0 25.7 96.5 19.1 96.2 87.6 89.8 73.1 66.3 72.3
Rajanna Sircilla 98.5 90.4 67.1 99.0 90.8 96.3 26.7 97.6 10.5 95.4 89.9 90.1 84.1 73.3 72.7
Ranga Reddy 98.2 95.5 75.1 95.3 83.4 90.3 17.4 97.2 15.5 92.7 89.8 90.0 85.8 67.8 72.2
Sangareddy 97.5 82.8 66.4 98.3 92.9 89.5 10.4 93.0 19.7 95.1 84.7 89.0 78.5 74.0 77.8 53.1 50.7
Siddipet 98.5 86.1 62.6 98.9 94.3 89.8 23.0 99.7 18.2 90.5 74.1 85.9 63.1 81.0 71.1
Suryapet 93.0 92.7 70.4 99.7 97.8 87.1 20.6 95.9 16.2 94.2 88.6 88.7 70.4 70.2 61.6
Vikarabad 89.1 78.0 54.8 98.7 93.0 83.2 18.0 95.0 9.1 86.7 80.8 86.9 86.2 66.1 77.8 44.5 31.6
Wanaparthy 93.5 91.4 62.8 100.0 95.9 92.6 23.8 99.0 13.8 96.6 87.6 83.6 87.0 71.4 82.3
Warangal Rural 97.4 86.8 70.4 98.7 89.7 82.3 20.7 100.0 18.3 94.5 93.8 90.5 79.0 83.7 69.8 25.8 41.7
Warangal Urban 96.6 88.4 71.3 96.4 92.8 96.2 19.6 99.7 11.2 93.0 92.6 92.3 70.1 78.5 81.5
Yadadri Bhuvanagiri 98.7 92.1 67.2 97.9 91.9 91.5 28.2 97.7 9.0 94.1 93.2 94.9 76.7 69.6 67.3
Pre-pregnancy Pregnancy Delivery & postnatal Early childhood

0
20
40
60
80
100
Overweight/
obesity
child
Overweight/
obesity
women
Overweight/
obesity
men
High blood
pressure
women
High blood
pressure
men
High sugar
level
women
High sugar
level
men
%
2015-16 2019-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Stunting Wasting Severe wasting Underweight
child
Anemia
child
Underweight
women
Anemia
Non pregnant
women
Anemia
Pregnant
women
%
2019-20 2015-16
Children: Stunting and wasting prevalence each increased by 5
percentage points (pp), between 2016 and 2020. Underweight and
anemia increased by 4pp and 9pp respectively between 2016 and
2020.
Women: Underweight declined by 4pp from 2016 to 2020. Anemia
increased by 1pp and 5pp among non-pregnant and pregnant women
respectively, between 2016 and 2020. Overweight/obesity increased
by 1pp between 2016 and 2020.
Men: Overweight/obesity increased by 8pp between 2016 and 2020.
Attention is needed to improve (%s in 2020):
• Outcomes: Anemia in children (70%) among non-pregnant women
(58%) and pregnant women (53%).
• Immediate determinants: Early initiation of breastfeeding (37%);
adequate diet (9%) .
• Underlying determinants: Women with ≥ 10 years education
(46%)
• Coverage of interventions: ORS during diarrhea (56%); Zinc during
diarrhea (39%).
Trends in nutrition outcomes, determinants and coverage of interventions in Telangana (2016 and 2019)
Undernutrition outcomes Overweight/obesity and non communicable diseases
Immediate determinants Key takeaways
Underlying determinants
Interventions across the first 1000 days
Source: NFHS-3 (2005-06), NFHS-4 (2015-16) & NFHS-5 state factsheets and state
reports (2019-20)
Note: Telangana was formed in 2014, therefore there is no data for the state in NFHS 3
(2005-06).
(%)
(%)
(%)

Annex: Methodological notes
• Nutrition outcomes, their immediate and underlying determinants, and nutrition related interventions were identified following the Poshan Abhiyaan
monitoring framework.
• The selected indicators were harmonized across the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) 3 (2005-06) and 4 (2015-16) data and NFHS 5 factsheets (2019).
For those indicators that were not comparable, details were specified in a footnote.
• The method of women sampling across the three NFHS rounds was compared:
• Descriptive statistics were estimated, and trend analysis was conducted to examine changes in outcomes, determinants, and coverage of interventions
across the three time periods. Further, top 10 districts with the highest change in prevalence between 2016 & 2019 were identified. Statistical software Stata
16.0 and R were used to perform the analyses.
• District level headcount of undernutrition outcomes was computed using undernutrition prevalence and projected population data for the year 2019.
o The prevalence P was calculated as children/women with nutritional deficit (q) divided by the eligible sample of children/women (n) in the district (j) and expressed in percentage as: Pj= (qj/nj)
×100
o The headcount was calculated as the product of P and the total eligible population N for each district: Hj= Pj×Nj
• Findings were visualized using spatial maps, bar graphs and line plots. The maps and other graphs were prepared on R and Excel, respectively.
• Cut-off values for public health significance were based on WHO guidelines on all indicators
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332223/9789241516952-eng.pdf?ua=1 except severe wasting (based on agreement with UNICEF)
NFHS-4 (2015-2016) NFHS-5 (2019-2020)
• All eligible women age 15-49 i.e. all
women age 15-49 who are usual
members of the selected households
or who spent the night before the
survey in the selected households
were eligible to be interviewed in the
survey.
• Information on sampling strategy not
available yet

Annex: Indicator definitions
Mortality and nutrition outcomes
Neonatal mortality rate Neonatal mortality rate per 1000 live births
Infant mortality rate Infant mortality rate per 1000 live births
Under-five mortality rate Under-five mortality rate (U5MR) per 1000 live births
Low birth weight Percentage of live births in the five years preceding the survey with a reported birth weight less than 2.5 kg, based on either a written record or the mother's recall
Stunting among children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are stunted i.e. height-for-age z score < -2SD
Wasting among children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are wasted i.e. weight-for-height z score < -2SD
Severe wasting among children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are wasted i.e. weight-for-height z score < -3SD
Underweight children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are underweight i.e. weight-for-age z score < -2SD
Anemia among children Percentage of children age 6-59 months who are anemic i.e. (Hb <11.0 g/dl)
Underweight women Percentage of women age 15-49 whose Body Mass Index (BMI) is below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m2)
Anemia among non-pregnant women Percentage of non-pregnant women age 15-49 who are anemic (<12.0 g/dl)
Anemia among pregnant women Percentage of pregnant women age 15-49 who are anemic (<11.0 g/dl)
Overweight/obesity - children Percentage of children age 0-59 months who are overweight i.e. weight-for-height z score > 2SD
Overweight/obesity - women Percentage of men age 15-54 who are overweight or obese (BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2)
Overweight/obesity - men Percentage of men age 15-54 who are overweight or obese (BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2)
High blood pressure among women^ Percentage of women age 15-49 with elevated blood pressure (Systolic >140 mm Hg or diastolic >90 mm Hg)
High blood pressure among men^ Percentage of men age 15-54 with elevated blood pressure (Systolic >140 mm Hg or diastolic >90 mm Hg)
High sugar level among women^ Percentage of women age 15-49 with elevated blood pressure (Systolic >140 mm Hg or diastolic >90 mm Hg)
High sugar level among men^ Percentage of men age 15-54 with high blood sugar levels (141-160 mg/dl)
^ Indicator not available in NFHS-3; $ Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets/state reports; 0 Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet

Immediate determinants
Early initiation of breastfeeding Percentage of children under age 3 years breastfed within one hour of birth for the last child born in the 3 years before the survey
Exclusive breastfeeding Percentage of youngest children under age 6 months living with mother who were exclusively breastfed
Timely introduction of
complementary foods0
1Percentage of youngest children age 6-8 months living with mother who received solid or semi-solid food; 2Percentage of youngest children age 6-8 months
living with mother who received solid or semi-solid food and breastmilk
Continued breastfeeding at 2 years$ Percentage of youngest children 12–23 months of age who were fed breast milk during the previous day
Adequate diet0 Percentage of youngest children 6–23 months of age who consumed a minimum acceptable diet during the previous day
Eggs and/or flesh foods
consumption$
Percentage of youngest children 6–23 months of age who consumed egg and/or flesh food during the previous day
Sweet beverage$ Percentage of youngest children 6–23 months of age who consumed a sweet beverage during the previous day
Bottle feeding for infants$ Percentage of youngest children 0–23 months of age who were fed from a bottle with a nipple during the previous day
Women with body mass index <18.5
kg/m2 0
1Percentage of women age 15-49 with a youngest child < 5 years who have BMI below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) ; 2Percentage of women age 15-49 whose BMI
is below normal (BMI <18.5 kg/m2)
Consumed IFA 100+ days Percentage of mothers age 15-49 who consumed iron folic acid for 100 days or more during the last pregnancy in last five years preceding the survey
Diarrhea in the last two weeks0 1Percentage of youngest children under age five who had diarrhoea in the two weeks preceding the survey; 2Percentage of children under age 5 who had
diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey
ARI in the last two weeks0 1Percentage of youngest children under age five who had symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) in the two weeks preceding the survey; 2Percentage of
children under age five who had symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) in the two weeks preceding the survey

^ Indicator not available in NFHS-3; $ Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets/state reports; @Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets but available in NFHS-5 states reports; 0 Indicator comparable between NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 but differs slightly with NFHS-5
Underlying determinants
Women who are literate0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 with a birth in five years preceding the survey who are literate i.e. those who completed standard 6 or higher and can read a
whole sentence; 2Percentage of women age 15-49 who are literate i.e. those who completed standard 9 or higher and can read a whole sentence or part of a
sentence.
Women with ≥10 years education0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 with a birth in five years preceding the survey with 10 or more years of schooling; 2Percentage of women age 15-49 with 10 or
more years of schooling
Girls 20-24 years married before age
of 18 years0
1Percentage of women aged 20-24 years with a birth in five years preceding the survey who were married before age 18 years; 2Percentage of women aged 20-24
years who were married before age 18 years
Women 15-19 years with child or
pregnant
Percentage of currently married women aged 15-49 who had their first birth before age 20 years and in the five years preceding the survey
HHs with improved drinking water
source0
1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that use an improved source of drinking water; 2Population living in households that use an
improved sanitation facility
HHs with improved sanitation facility0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that uses improved toilet facility; 2Population living in households that use an improved sanitation
facility
HHs with hand washing facility^$ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that had soap and water for washing hands
Open defecation@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that has no toilet facility/defecates in open
Safe disposal of feces$ Percentage of youngest children living with mother whose stools were disposed of safely
HHs with BPL card@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in households with BPL card
HHs with electricity0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 living in household that has electricity; 2Population living in households with electricity

1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet; @Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets but available in NFHS-5 state reports
Interventions
Demand for FP satisfied@ Percentage of currently married women age 15-49 with demand for family planning satisfied by modern methods
Iodized salt0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 living in HHs that use iodized salt; 2Percentage of households using iodized salt
Any ANC visits$ Percentage of women age 15-49 with a live birth in the five years who received at least one ANC for the last birth
ANC first trimester Percentage of women (15-49 years of age) attended by any provider during the first trimester of pregnancy that led to the birth of the youngest child in the last 2
years
≥ 4ANC Percentage of mothers age 15-49 who had at least 4 antenatal care visits for last birth in the 5 years before the survey
Received MCP card Percentage of mothers who registered last pregnancy in the 5 years preceding the survey for which she received a Mother and Child Protection (MCP) card
Received IFA tab/syrup@ Percentage of women who received IFA (given or purchased) tablets during the pregnancy for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey
Tetanus injection Percentage of women whose last birth was protected against neonatal tetanus (for last birth in the five years preceding the survey )
Deworming- pregnancy@ Percentage of women who took an intestinal parasite drug during the pregnancy for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey
Weighing- pregnancy@ Percentage of women age 15-49 with a live birth in the five years preceding the survey who were weighed during ANC for the last birth
Birth preparedness counselling$ Percentage of women who had at least one contact with a health worker in the three months preceding the survey and were counselled on birth preparedness;
calculated among women age 15-49 who gave birth in the five years preceding the survey
Breastfeeding counselling@ Percentage of women who met with a community health worker in the last three months of pregnancy and received advice on breastfeeding (for the last
pregnancy in the five years preceding the survey)
Counselling on keeping baby warm@ Percentage of women who met with a community health worker in the last three months of pregnancy and received advice on keeping the baby warm for their
most recent live birth in the five years preceding the survey
Cord care counselling^@ Percentage of women who met with a community health worker in the last three months of pregnancy and received advice on cord care for their most recent live
birth in the five years preceding the survey
Food supplementation - pregnancy@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received supplementary food from AWC during pregnancy
Health & nutrition education –
pregnancy@
Percentage of mothers who received health and nutrition education from an Anganwadi Centre (AWC) during last pregnancy in the five years preceding the survey
Malaria prevention- use of bed nets^$ Percentage of women who used mosquito net during the pregnancy for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey

1 Definition per NFHS-3/NFHS-4 ; 2 Definition as per NFHS-5 factsheet; @Indicator not available in NFHS-5 factsheets but available in NFHS-5 state reports
Interventions
Institutional birth0 1Percentage of women age 15-49 who gave birth in health/institutional facility for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey;
2Percentage of live births to women age 15-49 in the five years preceding the survey that took place in a health/institutional facility
Financial assistance (JSY)@ Percentage of women who received financial assistance under JSY for their most recent live birth that took place in institutional facility in the 5 years
preceding the survey
Skilled birth attendant0 1Percentage of women whose last delivery was attended by a skilled health personnel for their most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey;
2Percentage of births attended by skilled health personnel for births in the 5 years before the survey
Postnatal care for mothers Percentage of mothers who received postnatal care from a doctor/nurse/LHV/ANM/midwife/other health personnel within 2 days of delivery for their
most recent live birth in the five years preceding the survey
Postnatal care for babies Percentage of children who received postnatal care from a doctor /nurse /LHV /ANM /midwife /other health personnel within 2 days of delivery for last
birth in the 5 years before the survey
Food supplementation – postnatal@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received supplementary food from AWC while breastfeeding
Health & nutrition education – postnatal@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received health check-ups from AWC while breastfeeding
Full immunization0 1Percentage of youngest living children age 12-23 months fully vaccinated based on information from either vaccination card or mother's recall;
2Percentage of children age 12-23 months fully vaccinated based on information from either vaccination card or mother's recall
Vitamin A – early childhood0 1Percentage of youngest children age 6-59 months who received Vitamin A supplementation in the last 6 months preceding the survey; 2 Percentage of
children age 9-35 months who received a vitamin A dose in the last 6 months
Pediatric IFA0@ Percentage of youngest children age 6-59 months who received iron supplements in the past 7 days preceding the survey
Deworming – early childhood0@ Percentage of youngest children age 6-59 months who received deworming tablets in the last 6 months preceding the survey
Care seeking for ARI0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 years with fever or symptoms of ARI in the 2 weeks preceding the survey taken to a health facility or health
provider; 2Percentage of children under age 5 years with fever or symptoms of ARI in the 2 weeks preceding the survey taken to a health facility or health
provider
ORS during diarrhea0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who received oral rehydration salts (ORS);
2Percentage of children under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who ORS
Zinc during diarrhea0 1Percentage of youngest children under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who received zinc; 2Percentage of children
under age 5 years with diarrhoea in the 2 weeks preceding the survey who received zinc
Food supplementation (children 6-35
months)$
Percentage of youngest children age 6-35 months who received food supplements from AWC in the 12 months preceding the survey
Weighing – early childhood@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 who were weighed at AWC in the 12 months preceding the survey
Counselling on child growth@ Percentage of youngest children under age 5 whose mother received counselling from an AWC after child was weighed in the 12 months preceding the
survey

Improving nutrition in Telangana:Trends in outcomes, determinants and interventions between 2006 and 2020

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Improving nutrition in Telangana:Trends in outcomes, determinants and interventions between 2006 and 2020

Similar to Improving nutrition in Telangana:Trends in outcomes, determinants and interventions between 2006 and 2020 (17)

More from POSHAN

More from POSHAN (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Improving nutrition in Telangana:Trends in outcomes, determinants and interventions between 2006 and 2020