Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Model Driven Engineering for Design-Runtime Interaction in Complex Systems: Scientific Challenges and Roadmap - STAF 2018 @Toulouse, France

143 views

Published on

Full paper is available from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01890878

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Model Driven Engineering for Design-Runtime Interaction in Complex Systems: Scientific Challenges and Roadmap - STAF 2018 @Toulouse, France

  1. 1. Model Driven Engineering for Design-Runtime Interaction in Complex Systems: Scientific Challenges and Roadmap First International Workshop on Model-Driven Engineering for Design- Runtime Interaction in Complex Systems (MDE@DeRun) Co-located with Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations 2018 June 28, 2018 - Toulouse, France Hugo Bruneliere, Romina Eramo, Abel Gomez, Valentin Besnard, Jean-Michel Bruel, Martin Gogolla, Andreas Kastner, Adrian Rutle
  2. 2. ● Complex Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are everywhere ○ Automotive, aerospace, industrial production, etc. ● One of the major challenges in CPSs ○ Better integration between design and runtime aspects ○ Different natures of models (design vs. runtime) ○ Different types of traceability information ● A key point in MegaM@Rt2 project ○ Critical situations at runtime → Failures in design? ○ Feedback loop... Introduction (1/3) 2
  3. 3. ● MDE@DeRun workshop at STAF 2018 ○ Interacting between design time and runtime (e.g. within heterogeneous engineering practices) ○ Inferring design deviations, identifying affected elements (e.g. from runtime system configurations) ○ Practically integrating any feedback collected at runtime into design level models Introduction (2/3) 3
  4. 4. ● MDE@DeRun workshop at STAF 2018 ○ Analyzing runtime data collecting inputs for design artifacts ( e.g. probes injection) ○ V&V for linking runtime analysis with design models expressing both FRs and NFRs ○ (Industrial) case studies, experience reports, literature reviews, visionary positions, etc. Introduction (3/3) 4
  5. 5. 5 5 papers selected and presented...
  6. 6. ● From Modeling to Test Case Generation in the Industrial Embedded System Domain ○ Aliya Hussain, Saurabh Tiwari, Jagadish Suryadevara and Eduard Enoiu Contribution Summary: paper #1 6
  7. 7. ● A System Modeling Approach to Enhance Functional and Software Development ○ Saurabh Tiwari, Emina Smajlovic, Amina Krekic and Jagadish Suryadevara Contribution Summary: paper #2 7
  8. 8. ● Automated Consistency Preservation in Electronics Development of Cyber-Physical System ○ Daniel Zimmermann and Ralf H. Reussner ○ Flexible views with Vitruvius approach Contribution Summary: paper #3 8
  9. 9. ● Embedded UML Model Execution to Bridge the Gap Between Design and Runtime ○ Valentin Besnard, Matthias Brun, Frederic Jouault, Ciprian Teodorov and Philippe Dhaussy Contribution Summary: paper #4 9
  10. 10. ● Sketching a Model-Based Technique for Integrated Design and RunTime Description ○ Andreas Kastner, Martin Gogolla, Khanh-Hoang Doan and Nisha Desai Contribution Summary: paper #5 10
  11. 11. 11 Live discussions in panel...
  12. 12. ● “Explicit correspondences and/or traceability links are needed between runtime and design models.” ○ Seems obvious, but far from being the case… ○ Traceability is widely treated in the literature, but not so much in the runtime ↔ design time context... ● Questions ○ Which types of correspondences? ○ Which approaches to support them? ○ How correspondences are produced? ○ When correspondences are produced? Discussions: Challenges & Roadmap (1/3) 12
  13. 13. ● “A better understanding of the nature of the available runtime information (and its possible impacts on the design information) is required.” ○ Not to be confused with Models@runtime... ● Questions ○ Which types of runtime information? ○ How are they obtained? ○ How are they represented? ○ Who uses runtime information? ○ How are they visualized? From which viewpoints? Discussions: Challenges & Roadmap (2/3) 13
  14. 14. ● “The objectives and benefits of leveraging such correspondences and information need to be defined.“ ○ Create awareness of problems in design or critical situations that may occur… ● Objectives ○ Analyzing correspondences… ○ Providing inference capabilities… ○ Synchronizing with requirements… ○ Reverse engineering... Discussions: Challenges & Roadmap (3/3) 14
  15. 15. ● Integrating design and runtime aspects raises interesting challenges from the Modeling/MDE perspective ● Also appears to be a relevant area from a more industrial perspective (cf. MegaM@Rt2 project)… ● MDE@DeRun second edition is coming at STAF 2019, in Eindhoven, The Netherlands ○ Monday 15th of July 2019 ○ https://megamart2-ecsel.eu/mde-derun-2019/ Conclusion 15
  16. 16. Check out the full paper from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01890878 Event details from https://megamart2-ecsel.eu/mde-derun-2018/ Springer link - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-04771-9_40 Contact the main authors by emails hugo.bruneliere@imt-atlantique.fr, romina.eramo@univaq.it, agomezlla@uoc.edu Thanks for your attention! 16

×