Paper On Euthanasia

Paper On Euthanasia
A patient's right to autonomy is respected, yet it is questioned when it comes to euthanasia. When a person requests euthanasia they are requesting the
right to die on their own terms. Due to the different morals and beliefs of the people, there are two major opposing sides on this issue, those that support
euthanasia and those who are against it. The circumstances of the patient and the way they wish to die yield different opinions from the public. Overall
euthanasia is a valid option for patients and should be allowed.
There are many different types of euthanasia and each form gets its own response. Assistedsuicide and physician assisted suicide are more controversial
than the other types of euthanasia because the patient intentionally...show more content...
Some foreign countries do have euthanasia as an option for various patients. The most known country being the Netherlands. The dutch law was one of
the first to give the approval of euthanasia. The law in the Netherlands regarding euthanasia has a set criteria that the practice falls under to ensure that
the doctor who carried out the patient's request is not persecuted for committing a crime (Boer 197). The process must follow the set regulations or else
the patient's death would not be considered euthanasia but rather a serious crime. Euthanasia had been legal in the netherlands since before the
1980's, but on January 1, 2002 euthanasia was made fully legal throughout the Netherlands. With the formal legalization some of the previous
regulations changed. From that date on the criteria was that euthanasia was: the only way to end suffering in a patient that had no chance of
recovery, requested by the patient, and the patient's doctor had consulted with at least one other doctor about the case. Only cases that did not meet
the criteria were then examined and deliberated by judges. In these deliberations most of the cases passed the criteria unless there were any
procedural errors (Boer 198). The change in the law allowed more cases to be processed, providing optimal results in many more cases. The
Netherlands set a precedent that not all countries agree with. Australia is one of the many countries that does not allow patients to opt for euthanasia.
In Australia, each state legislation outlaws voluntary active euthanasia, assisted suicide and physician assisted suicide. The Australian law says that all
acts resulting in someone else's death is labeled as murder (Ebrahimi 73). France forbids assisted suicide and euthanasia, the law does not believe a
patient's consent justifies someone taking their life away. However they do allow the patient to decide to stop end–of–life treatments and die in a
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Value of Life: Euthanasia
"Euthanasia refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering" (Euthanasia, 2013). Every year, hundreds of
people are injured greatly both physical and psychological. Some of these are so heavily hurt that they feel they have nothing left to live for. Their
lives are ruined and all they can do is sit, eat and sleep. In some cases it is discussed if euthanasia could be an option. However, it has always been a
question how bad an injury is before one can perform euthanasia. Is the value of life bigger than the pain of a victim? In this term paper I will
therefore, through facts, researches and personal beliefs, try to answer the question: Who and/or what determines which lives are worthy or not?...show
more content...
The US value is estimated to be around 7 million and the British about 4.2. (Kip Viscusi, 2005, page 16)
On the other hand one of the strongest antagonist groups of euthanasia is deep religious groups, and in the US especially Christians. They say that
life is a gift from God and one should not kill other persons, as it is a disgrace upon Him. Life is priceless and it can certainly not be measured in
money. About 80% of US citizens are members of Christianity and this is certainly one of the main reasons euthanasia is illegal in 46 of the 50 states.
However, in a referendum in Oregon a slight majority, 51%, voted for legalisation of euthanasia. (Facts and Statistics on Euthanasia, 2013). This comes
to show that the US is very a multicultural and multireligious country. With many different opinions and arguments, both for and against euthanasia, it
is difficult to determine whose desire that should pass.
The restriction of the law lays mostly in the value of life. The adversaries of euthanasia usually argue with the fact that a life is of such value that
one should not be able to kill even if it is the persons' greatest wish. On the other hand the advocates say that "The competent patient can, and ought
to be accorded the right to, determine what is to be done to him or her, even if . . . it means he or she will die," as Poggy Battin points out in her
novel, "The least worth death".

Essay Pro Euthanasia
When someone is inevitably dying and in inexplicable pain is it really a crime to grant their wishes and end their suffering? As of right now
euthanasia is illegal in many countries and is a very controversial topic. Is it compassion for the patient helping them in ending their life or murder?
The doctor is not giving death as an option, it is the patients choice and even where it is legal there are many rules. Euthanasia should not be considered
a crime because the patient is not being murdered; they are having their suffering end in a painless, humane way out of compassion for the patient and
their family.
Euthanasia is defined by the World Book Millennium 2000 encyclopaedia as, "the practise of painlessly ending the lives of people...show more content...
The reason to legalize euthanasia is clear, these people need to have the choice to die with dignity.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian more commonly known as Dr. Death is greatly known for his opinion that euthanasia should be legalized and his work with
patients seeking help. He was very important in showing euthanasia and voicing his opinion on the subject so the public could not ignore the
importance of the matter. Dr. Kevorkian was said to have been involved with 130 suicides by patients who wanted to end their own lives (Nicol and
Wylie 17). He had two machines he used to help the patients, one an injection and the other a mask, however both machines were operated by the
patient and although Dr. Kevorkian was taken to court many times for these he was not convicted because the patient was in control. He was very
careful as to not actually commit the act himself until he was contacted by Thomas Youk, a young with Lou Gheric's disease; Lou Gheric's disease is
when the muscle stop working and eventually the patient chokes to death. Tom's condition prevented him from actually operating the machines and
therefore Dr. Kevorkian decided that he would operate the machine himself because he cared greatly about all his patients and could not let Tom live in
his constant fear (Nicol and Wylie 11). Dr. Kevorkian taped Tom's wishes and then himself hooking up the machine and pushing the button to inject the
drugs. He then proceed to

Euthanasia Essay examples
Euthanasia is often called "mercy killing". It is intentionally making someone die, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the
act of ending someone's life, who is terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today. Euthanasia can be
considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also
consider it a form of murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person's suffering in this world. Many physicians and psychiatrists believe that it may a humane act.
From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be appropriate. What we seek inhuman existence is to be...show more content...
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families would begin the healing process from grief and/or
depression from the situation.
From Mill's perspective, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she wants. Mill has written that if the person does not
cause harm to others, it is the person's right, or liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to
choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it, and it is a volunteered act.
Brandt argues for approval of euthanasia, but killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that person and goes against the preferences of
self–preservation. However, Brandt says that the above is not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible. Brandt says that not all
killing is injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one's expressed wishes he says. Euthanasia could be considered doing a person
a favor, because you cannot injure something if you are relieving it of pain.
The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let nature take its course. We are disturbing what is
occurring or happening naturally to the person. Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said

Essay about Euthanasia
Euthanasia and Physician–Assisted Suicide
Individual cases presented to justify legalizing physician assisted suicide fail to deal with underlying medical failures to control pain, creating an
illusion of control over death, and not acknowledging the thousands of patients murdered inappropriately. This is an interesting and a very controversial
issue in today's society. Euthanasia has negative sides, it can hurt society, and everyone needs to learn more bout it.
The word Euthanasia is Greek in origin. It arrived from the prefix "eu", meaning fear, easy, and fortunate and from the word "thanatos" meaning death.
The main idea of Euthanasia is that someone has a conscientious death...show more content...
Further, if an individual is injected with medicine that is intended to be vital to curing his disease or make him well again, and the individual dies in
the end, then this is also not euthanasia or wrongful killing. Relating to, when a patient's situation is such that it is irrational to pray that any medical
procedures or treatments will preserve his life, failing to administer the procedures or treatments is not euthanasia. If the individual parishes, this will
be to the effect of his injuries or disease and not because of his dereliction to acquire treatment (Gay–Williams, 290). The choice not to continue
medical treatment after the realization that the patient has a slim to none chance of profiting from it has been characterized by some as "passive
euthanasia". This phrase is deceiving and incorrect. In most cases, the individual entangled is not murdered, nor is the decease of the individual
intended by the forbearing of increased treatment. The main concern is to spare the individual any increased and unexonerable pain, to protect him
from the in distinctions of incurable manipulations, and to elude the additional financial and impeluous problems of the family (Gay–Williams, 291).
Every individual has a genuine desire to recommence his/her life. Our reflex and acknowledgement fit us to defend our self from attacker, run from
dangerous animals, and jump out of the way of oncoming traffic. "Our bodies are

Essay on Personal Evaluation of Euthanasia
Personal Evaluation of Euthanasia
I feel that euthanasia should be legalized.
I believe that everyone has the right to choose how he or she live and die. Not everybody will have an easy death. Some terminal pain cannot be
controlled, even with the best of care and the strongest of drugs. Other distressing symptoms, which come with diseases, such as sickness, no mobility,
breathlessness and fever cannot always be relieved. A life filled with pain is horrible and it ruins the quality of life. I believe that that no life is better
than a life without communication and happiness. I think that the point of life is to find happiness and suffering is surely not achieving this.
People should not...show more content...
This is however, a rare thing. Doctors are dedicated to give care to the sick, and they would nearly always now the likeliness of a recovery.
A pro–longed life is intolerable for people with a condition, which leaves the brain alert but eventually shuts down all bodily functions and skills of
communicating. How can people be expected to live like this? For people like this and also people in PVS, (persistent vegetative state) I believe that
their legal representatives or close family should have the choice and the trust to let them live a prolonged life or to end their life and let them die with
dignity.
My opinion is, that anyone who is terminally ill should have the option to have euthanasia. However, I think that there should be very strict rules on
how euthanasia should be done and whom it should be done on. I also think that all doctors should not be able to use euthanasia and that there should
be special clinics.
Comment About Religious Views =============================
Most religions disapprove of euthanasia. Some of them absolutely forbid it. The Roman Catholic Church, for example, is one of the most active
religions in opposing euthanasia.

Religions are opposed to euthanasia for a number of reasons.
Roman Catholics strongly oppose euthanasia because God should decide who dies.

Ethics of Euthanasia Essay
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like
putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to
depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with
terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician
would give a patient an aid in dying. "Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations,
...show more content...
Whether murder is done in a peaceful, non painful way or in a very gruesome, unimaginable way, it is still considered murder. Physicians have no
way of knowing 'what is best for the patient' especially if that patient's terminal illness prevents them from speaking. Not only is assisted suicide
considered murder, it also goes against Physicians' Hippocratic Oath. "Hippocratic Oath: An oath (or promise) all physicians must swear to uphold,
regarding the ethical practices of the medical profession" (Lee). By allowing doctors to stray from this oath, it will be easier for them to aid in or
carry out assisted suicides when it will never be entirely necessary for them to consider the option. "In 2005, Texas doctors removed two patients from
life support without advanced directions and against the wishes of the patient's family" (Pawlick). By not legalizing assisted suicides, families will be
able to decide when their family member is physically unable to continue with the provided treatments, but only when the patient themselves can no
longer communicate their wishes and no document stating how they should go about the situation has been left in their families possession.
Ethical issues are not the only problem. Some argue that euthanasia also creates issues from a legal perspective. "One legal question is whether assisted
suicide violates the Controlled Substances Act, a federal law governing the distribution of drugs" (Lee). Such

Speech On Euthanasia
Have you ever imagined one of your loved ones suffering from a painful illness? Have you ever wanted that person to die and rest in peace? This is
called Euthanasia, which means the termination of a patient's life who is suffering from excruciating pain and a terminal disease. Euthanasia came
from the Greek for good ("eu") and death ("thanatos") "good death"(Sklansky, 200, p.5). there are more than four types of euthanasia such as active
euthanasia which means that death is caused directly by another person by giving the patient a poisonous injection. Passive euthanasia refers to the
withdrawal of treatment that keeps the patient alive. Voluntary euthanasia means that the patient requests assisted suicide, while involuntary euthanasia
means that it is done against the patient's will. Euthanasia started in both the Roman empire and Greece. In ancient Rome, euthanasia was considered a
crime and was taken as murder. In general, Greece accepted euthanasia for patients who are suffering from extreme pain. Plato wrote "Mentally and
physically ill persons should be left to death, they do not have the right to live"(http:www.life.org.nz/euthanasia/abouteuthanasia/history–euthanasia1/.)
Sir Thomas More was the first prominent Christian to mention on euthanasia in his book...show more content...
Different regions affect how individuals see euthanasia as acceptable or not acceptable. Religions shape how we think and how we should take
actions in many situations. Moral considerations also have a strong effect on how people see euthanasia. People may argue that euthanasia should be
acceptable because they think that a person is free to choose how he or she want's to die. We are still in confusion and it will be an on going condition,
because we still have different religions, moral considerations and

Essay on Euthanasia
Euthanasia
Euthanasia, as defined by the Encarta Encyclopedia, is the "practice of mercifully ending a person's life in order to release the person from incurable
disease, intolerable suffering, or undignified death" (Encarta, 2004). Euthanasia is a Greek word, which means "good death." As humans, we understand
death is something we cannot avoid but having some control over death is empowering and reassuring to us. If someone is suffering from a terminal
illness, intolerable pain, or in a long–term coma, euthanasia is an acceptable option for someone to end his or her life. With the consent of their
doctor(s) these people should be able to have the law on their side supporting their decisions.
Euthanasia began in 1906 when...show more content...
It should be a nation–wide law that each person can easily and affordably make the decision to die if their quality of life has suffered to an irreparable
extends and/or their illness is terminal and painful.
Just as a woman has the right to choose to have an abortion based on the fact that it is her baby to do with as she chooses, the same woman should
know and be able to decide if it is her time pass away. This in no way advocates suicide or assisted suicide. That should be obvious. It is necessary
to evaluate each patient and be sure they are of sound mind and body. Euthanasia is a choice for people whose lives have no redeeming value to them
or their loved ones and they are already faced with eminent death.
It is incredibly painful to watch someone you love go through so much hardship and strife in order to die. Death is a natural occurrence in all our
lives. The more active we can be in deciding when death occurs, the less frightening it will be. The power to decide when to die makes the individual
take comfort in the fact that his loved–ones will be in less pain, for a shorter time in these last days.
At the very least, passive euthanasia should be universally accepted. Passive euthanasia is the hastening of someone's death by changing the form of
life support and actually letting nature take its course (Robinson, 2002).
This may be done in many ways, for example:

–Taking one off life support systems
–Preventing further

Research Paper on Euthanasia
Research Paper on Euthanasia
Paper Presented to
Professor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction....................................................................1
Eight Arguments to Consider................................................2
The Right to Die...............................................................2
Patient Suffering................................................................3
Slippery Slope to Legalized Murder.........................................4
Hippocratic Oath and Prohibition of Killing...............................5
Government Involvement.....................................................5
Palliative Care..................................................................6
Healthcare Spending Implications...........................................7

Value of Life....................................................................7
Conclusion......................................................................8
Works Cited....................................................................9
EUTHANASIA – The Right to Choose or a Slippery Slope...show more content...
A state's categorical ban on physician assistance to suicide –– as applied to competent, terminally ill patients who wish to avoid unendurable pain and
hasten inevitable death –– substantially interferes with this protected liberty interest and cannot be sustained." – ACLU [3] On the other hand is
someone who is in the situation of confronting a terminal illness or who has been in unbearable pain for a protracted period of time able to make
such a decision. Everyone has been in pain in their life and thought about what it would be like to face a life threatening illness, but they are thinking
about it when they are not in that situation. With this calm state of mind one could more rationally make a life and death decision, but once in those
circumstances would anyone be clear enough to decide to end their life?
Patient Suffering Pro Euthanasia advocates believe that nobody should have to suffer long, painful, and hopeless circumstances if they don't want
to. Why should the state be allowed to keep someone alive who is in pain and has no hope of recovery? People in a persistent vegetative state, and
people who have a terminal illness all deal with a life of intense pain, decreased quality of life, a sense of hopelessness. If they can choose to die and
there is no hope of a meaningful recovery why should they not be allowed to end that suffering, why does a government have the right to stop them and

Synthesis Essay Euthanasia
The decision to live or die should be determined by the patients' themselves rather than societal norms. As stated in the Constitution, citizens of the
United States reserve the right to privacy in the fourth amendment. Citizens withhold the decision to determine if physician–assisted suicide is
necessary. Even though there are many ethical implications regarding euthanasia, it should be legal across the nation to respect the patient's will.
Physician–assisted suicide can help terminate tremendous patient suffering at end–of–life. Euthanasia "assisted by a humane physician spares the
patient the pain and suffering that may be part of the dying process, and grants the patient a "mercifully" easy death." (Source C) Patients that are
suffering from a terminating disease or cancer...show more content...
Euthanasia is also protected in the Constitution by the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. For example, euthanasia is legal under the state of
Oregon. "Under the Oregon law when a terminally ill patient makes a request for assisted suicide, physicians are required to point out that palliative
care and hospice care are "feasible alternatives." (Source A) Medical professionals have the duty to provide this option, but they cannot force guardians
to agree to physician–assisted suicide. The final decision is reserved to the patient itself if they are mentally and physically capable. Respecting
euthanasia is a form of respect to the liberty interests of the Constitution. The right to die can be compared between an animal and a human being. In
a political cartoon, it shows that dogs have the right to die while a dying patient using euthanasia raises ethical concerns. This connection shows irony
of how a human being does not perceive as many rights as an animal itself. The right to die is a freedom of choice in which America represents liberty
and

Essay on The Morality of Euthanasia
People have the right to medical care, but pain and suffering for a person has to be one of the toughest things in life to deal with. In the health care
world, few topics create a debate as heated as euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek word meaning good death. Euthanasia is the practice of
ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. Most religious beliefs say that God is the only one that has
the right to decide the termination of any life. Euthanasia should be a person's right of choice legally and ethically. People are faced with choices on a
daily basis throughout their lives. Having the choice of euthanasia allows a quick, humane, and painless way to end pain and suffering....show more
content...
Religion allows a person to be comforted by God's will. People are to not suffer under Gods will if they have faith. The truth is, religion can't relieve
pain, suffering, and terminal illnesses. Millions of people go through the experience of pain, suffering, and terminal illness on a daily basis. Some pain
and suffering is on a temporary timeframe, some pain and suffering is long–term, and some pain and suffering is forever and will never go away.
Religion can't alleviate a person's pain, suffering, or condition without the help of the medical field. According to religion a person should not have to
suffer, yet there are millions of religious believers who suffer day–to–day. Jonathan Swift, a Priest, once took a tour of a hospital which had many sick
children and infants with whom they would never know a parent or a home. Most of the children and infants were terminally ill and were going to
pass. Jonathan made a powerful statement "To say these people were created in the "image of God" begs the question. At the existential moment
between life and death, is it not for us, the living, to commend these lives to God? What else can we do?" Even in religion there becomes a point where
pain and suffering or terminal illness begins to outweigh faith. Under these circumstances a person should have the right to choose euthanasia, when all
else fails, to end their pain and suffering. When it comes to euthanasia, under the right circumstances, a person should

Essay on The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia
Euthanasia, good or bad? In this following article I will be exploring euthanasia in more detail, the different Christian points of view, the strengths and
weaknesses of the euthanasia argument and finally my point of view on euthanasia and why I believe this.
First of all, what is euthanasia? It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend or family member is put in a position where they
might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone's life in a painless way. It seems pretty
simple but in reality it is a lot more complicated, not only for the people involved but for the society in general as well.
Overall there are four different types of...show more content...
One of the most important pieces of scripture a Christian follows is the 10 commandments and one, and in my opinion the most important,
commandment is "Do not commit murder." (Exodus 20:13)
This raises the question, is euthanasia murder? and in many Christian's view is that if a life is taken away earlier than God planed then it is murder
and therefore many Christian's point of view on euthanasia is that it is wrong.
Another quotation that supports what I believe is the general view of many Christians around the world is the idea that God has already planned out
our life and knows when the right time to die is. This is shown in the bible saying "He set the time for birth, and the time for death." (Ecclesiastes 3:2)
and again here: "your days allotted to me, had all been recorded in your book, before any of them began." (Psalm 139:16)
Both these quotations show, according to the bible, that God has already planned out our life–from the time that we are born to the time of our death.
The last Christian point of view is also shown through the bible saying "You created every part of me, you put me together in my mother's womb."
(Psalms 139:13)
This quotation is saying that God created everything about us and not only is linked with the point of view above saying that God has already
planned out our lives but is also linked with the idea that God created us and chose when we were born so he should

Thesis Statement On Euthanasia
ROOTS MILLENIUM SCHOOLS
Euthanasia: Interfering with life and death?
Amal Sikandar Ranjha
Table of Contents
1.Introduction.................................................................... 3
2.Thesis............................................................................... 4
3.Types of euthanasia....................................................... 4
4.Literature........................................................................ 5
5.Conclusion....................................................................... 7
6.Acknowledgements........................................................ 7 Introduction
From cloning to genetically modified food to designer babies, humans have long been known to interfere with the way nature does things; humans have
been modifying genes and improving the outlook in the pretext that it improves the quality of our lives. Humans also have a long history of interfering
with and trying to control the more divine...show more content...
The prevalent human ethics have made this topic enormous and highly controversial to its core. People around the globe have opposing views as to
what Euthanasia is, and whether it should be allowed or should the practitioners of euthanasia be punished. The National Health Service in the UK has
declared it illegal to help someone take their life whatever the circumstances may be.
The one name that comes up most frequently when talking about Euthanasia is Dr. Jack Kevorkian, also sometimes referred to as Dr. Death. He made
it his mission to travel across the United States of America, at his own expense, to help the people who considered that their lives were not worth
living anymore and assist them in committing suicide. Most of the times, due to extensive suffering, most patients simply give up; with no hope left,
they start to believe that the only way out of interminable pain and discomfort is to give up on their lives. Utter hopelessness makes them highly
vulnerable and at the same time impulsive too. So, they easily fall victim to the temptation of ending up their own lives with just little assistance from
people like Dr.

Essay on Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
Assisted suicide brings a debate that involves professional, legal and ethical issues about the value of the liberty versus the value of life. However,
before conceive an opinion about this topic is necessary know deeply its concept. Assisted suicide is known as the act of ending with the life of a
terminal illness patients for end with their insupportable pain. Unlike euthanasia, the decision is not made by the doctor and their families, but by the
patient. Therefore, doctors should be able to assist the suicide of their patients without being accused of committing a criminal offense. This conception
is supported by three points of view. The first point defenses the autonomy of people, which covers the right of people to make decision...show more
content...
In conclusion, assisted suicide is supported by the right of people to make decision about their life provided the patient is in the right mental state to do
it.
Another reason to legalize assisted suicide is the empathy for our fellow. For some people who suffer chronic pain or terminal illnesses, suicide is a
more ethical and respectable solution than suffer great pain until the day of their death, whereby people should have the obligation to relieve their
suffering and respect their dignity. Even if take a life should be considered immoral, let patients suffer during the remaining time of life, with no hope
of a better future or alleviating the pain will end is inhumane. People judge assisted suicide according to how much pain and suffering patient are
suffering. However, there are differences between pain and suffering. While pain is an objective concept that can be measured, suffering is a
subjective idea that cannot be measured (Ezekiel, 1999). The impossibility to measure the level of suffering open another question of how to know if
assisted suicide is justified when only the patient know his grade of suffering. In this instance, the weight relapses in the patient decision again.
Allowing assisted suicide society is preventing future terrible experiences that will convert the last days of patient life in torture. Studies of

Essay on Moral and Ethical Issues of Euthanasia
Moral and Ethical Issues of Euthanasia
As we all know, medical treatment can help save lives. But is there a medical treatment that would actually help end life? Although it's often debated
upon, the procedure is still used to help the aid of a patient's death. Usually dubbed as mercy killing, euthanasia is the "practice of ending a life so as to
release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering" (Encarta). My argument over this topic is that euthanasia should have strict
criteria over the use of it. There are different cases of euthanasia that should be looked at and different point of views that should be considered. I will
be looking into VE (Voluntary Euthanasia), which involves a request by the dying...show more content...
In the past, a person is considered dead if the signs of pulse or breathing is absent. But in the 1960s, advance life–supporting technologies have
re–defined the meaning of death. The invention of the mechanical ventilator or respirator and the heart–lung machine allowed physicians to revive or
artificially maintain function in hearts and lung. This made bigger chances for the survival of patients. Then later in the 1980s, brain activity is
added to the criteria of death. The brain acts as the center headquarters of all functioning parts of the body. The brain sends impulses through the
nerve to muscles and organs. The brain also controls memory and the ability for a person to learn and react to his or her environment. The brain is
divided into different parts for different functions. The front part of the brain is called the Cerebrum, which is referred to as the "higher brain." This
part of the brain controls the memory and thinking abilities of a person. The brainstem, composed of the midbrain, the pons, and the medulla oblangata
is called the "lower brain" because "it controls spontaneous and vegetative functions such as swallowing, yawning and sleep–wake cycles" (President's
Commission).
Since respiration and circulation can be restored, therefore defining brain death or the loss of brain function is a "certification of death" (Encarta). The
higher brain is considered to be the most important part in determining the death of a person

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia And Euthanasia
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia. Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of
arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Arguments).
Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The
religious argument states God chooses when human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they are
experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on Euthanasia. The topic that I am researching is
Euthanasia. There are many different arguments for and against Euthanasia. The four main types of arguments used by people who are against
Euthanasia are the religious argument, the 'slippery slope' argument, the medical ethics argument, and the alternative argument (Euthanasia and assisted
suicide–Argument. The pragmatic argument and the ethical argument are the two main types of arguments used to support the practice of Euthanasia
and assisted suicide (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Argument. The ethical argument is that people should have the freedom of choice to say if they
want euthanasia or not. The pragmatic argument is for euthanasia. . In addition, that is the definition of the topic. This is what makes the topic
interesting. What makes this topic

Euthanasi Euthanasia And Involuntary Euthanasia
Introduction:
When suffering gets to be too much, the severely ill have the choice of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of ending an organism's life as an act of
mercy to relieve them from their agony. Even though this practice which is commonly referred to as an assisted suicide seems harmless in the grand
scheme of life, it has caused a lot of controversy surrounding it. That is what makes euthanasia so interesting. There are countless different
categorizations, methods, and tiny details to account for. Euthanizing the ill and weak is nothing new and has been around for centuries. This essay
aims to cover all these topics and uncover the roots of euthanasia. These roots of euthanasia should be illegal because their merit is outweighed by
practical and ethical reasoning.
Literature Review:
Euthanasia, typically referred to as a mercy killing, spans over several different categories. One category includes voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.
There is a large difference between voluntary euthanasia and involuntary euthanasia. According to a Scottish Universities Medical Journal written by
Bhajneek Grewal, Jennifer Harrison, and David Jeffrey the difference between them is a as simple as it appears, one is voluntary and one isn't. To
elaborate on that, voluntary Euthanasia is performed with consent or permission from the suffering patient, whereas involuntary euthanasia is
performed without the consent of the patient. An example of this would be a person in coma who may

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia – Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being
right or wrong is one that most would prefer left alone. However, recent publicity on changes to existing laws has ignited considerable discussion and
has forced open the door to a much wider audience. The issues related to direct euthanasia have raised many questions in my mind, to which I am still
searching for answers. I believe it is necessary to consider arguments, both, for and against, in order to come to any conclusion. In this paper I will
address Brian Clowes' article in the "Pro–Life Activist's Encyclopedia", located on the...show more content...
Yet, his persistent use of medical cases where patients were classified as irreversibly comatose and where all decisions regarding their continual
treatment were made by others, neglects to recognize the numerous cases of terminally ill patients, who simply ask for the right to control their
own destiny and to die with dignity. His use of extreme cases, all of which were found in 'National Right to Life News', gives the reader a distorted
picture and neglects the many types of cases where the prolonging of life would be cruel, inhumane and immoral. (Johnstone, 1994:353)
EUTHANASIA SETS A BAD EXAMPLE? I would ask what kind of example are we giving our young by prolonging life at whatever cost to the
person? Is quantity of life always the best option? Is the taking of human life always wrong? In the 18th century William Mitford, an English historian
stated "Men fear death, as if unquestionably the greatess evil, and yet no man knows that it may not be the greatest good." (Bradley,
Daniels & Jones, 1969:194) Here the author compares the act of suicide among the young with the act of euthanasia with the terminally ill. He
believes, in making euthanasia an acceptable social practice, it will inevitably have negative repercussions on the rest of society. The writer argues that
by condoning euthanasia, we condone

Paper On Euthanasia

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Paper On Euthanasia