Consumption of Synbiotic Bread Decreases Triacylglycerol and VLDL Levels Whil...
ISI Paper Biscuit
1. This is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(8): 2451-2458, 2011
ISSN 1995-0756
2451
Corresponding Author
Department of food science and technology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch,
Tehran, Iran
Tel : +98 912 150 64 85
E-mail: hadaegh_h@hotmail.com
Effect of DATEM and fat reduction in semi-hard biscuits using RSM
1
H. Hadaegh, 2
B. Ghiassi Tarzi, 3
S.M. Seyyedain Ardabili, 4
A. Bassiri, 5
S. Khoda Khani
1,2,3
Department of food science and technology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran,
Iran
4
Institute of Chemical Technologies, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology
5
Department of Statistics, Allameh Tabatabai Univresity
H. Hadaegh, B. Ghiassi Tarzi, S.M. Seyyedain Ardabili, A. Bassiri, S. Khoda Khani: Effect of
DATEM and fat reduction in semi-hard biscuits using RSM
ABSTRACT
The effect of diacetyltartaric esters of monoglycerides (DATEM) on fat reduction of semi-hard biscuits
has been studied. Decreasing the amount of fat in 5 levels (5.37-50.63 percent) showed significant variations
in most studied characteristics (p ‹ 0.05). Addition of DATEM in 5 levels (0.42-0.99 percent) had significant
variation in some characteristics such as thickness, density, texture and color, but it didn’t have much
correlation with width, length and weight. Results which were analyzed by response surface method (RSM)
showed that biscuits with 26.23 percent fat reduction and 0.81 percent DATEM addition have the most
desirability. Also 35 consumers evaluated appearance, flavor, texture, color and general acceptance of biscuits
and the result was in conform to RSM results.
Key words: Biscuit, DATEM, Fat reduction, RSM
Introduction
Fat is an essential ingredient in biscuit
manufacture and is the largest component after flour
and sugar [11]. Fat in a biscuit formulation has a
multifaceted function [13]. It performs shortening and
textural functions in biscuits. During mixing of
biscuit dough, fat acts as a lubricant; it also
competes with the aqueous phase for the flour
surface and prevents the formation of a gluten
network in the dough [11,10]. It also interacts with
other ingredients to develop texture, mouth feel and
overall sensation of lubricity of the product [12]. By
using small amounts of emulsifier the fat phase is
spread more uniformly over the hydrophilic
ingredients such as flour, sugar, etc., in the dough
[9].
High fat intake is associated with various health
disorders such as obesity, cancer, high blood
cholesterol, and coronary heart disease. This
awareness has prompted consumers about the amount
of fat in their diet [13]. In this regard, the American
Heart Association suggested limiting fat consumption
to # 30% of kilocalorie and several researches have
attempted to reduce the fat content of baked products
[13,4,5,7,8,15].
Innovation of new products and exploitation of
alternative raw materials to reduce production costs
are also important for biscuit manufacturers [14].
The incorporation of emulsifiers with fat has
been proposed to reduce the interfacial tension and
increase the effectiveness of the fat, allowing less to
be used [7,1]. Sai Manohar et al. have reported that
the level and type of fat as well as emulsifiers
changed the rheological characteristics of biscuit
dough and quality of biscuits. They have clearly
shown the beneficial effect of using emulsifiers in
producing a soften dough with improved
machinability and better textural characteristics of
biscuits [11].
2. 2452Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(8): 2451-2458, 2011
Traditionally, lecithin has been used across the
range of biscuit types. It aids the dispersion of the
fat in semisweet doughs and improves the
emulsification during cream up in short doughs.
Monoglycerides and their derivatives are also the
effective emulsifiers. The polar part of the
monoglyceride molecule can also be enlarged and
made more effective by reacting with a food acid
such as lactic, citric, acetic and diacetylated tartaric
acid [9]. The latest one leads to an emulsifier name
Diacetyltartaric esters of monoglycerides (called as
DATEM).
The objective of the present work was to study
the effect of DATEM on the quality and also fat
reduction of semi-hard biscuit formulation. Also,
response surface methodology was used for modeling
the best formulation and minimizing the number of
baking trials.
Materials and methods
Biscuit Formula and Ingredients:
Biscuit dough was prepared according to the
following formula: Flour 100g, sugar 25g, fat 16g
(Behshahr Co., Tehran, Iran), non fat dry milk 0.5g
(Ramak Ltd., Shiraz, Iran), leavening agents 3g
(Kimia Saz Ltd., Tehran, Iran), lecithin 0.2g (ADM
Ltd, Netherlands). For preparation of low fat biscuits,
fat content in the biscuit formulation was reduced
from 5% to 50%, respectively. The replaced
emulsifier was DATEM (Kerry Ltd, Netherlands),
which was used from 0.4% to 0.99%, respectively.
Preparation of Biscuits:
Sugar and fat was creamed in a Z-blade mixer
for 2 min. at the speed of 70 rpm. After that, milk
powder, salt and leavening agents were added and
continue mixing for 7 min. to obtain a homogenous
cream. Then commercially available wheat flour with
sufficient water were added and mixed for 7min.
Chemical characteristics of the flour used has given
in Table 1. After the preparation of the dough, they
were sheeted to a thickness of 2mm, cut to rectangle
shape and baked in a tunnel oven for 5min. Then,
the baked biscuits were cooled and packed.
It should be noted that the complete
experimental design consisted of 14 experimental
trials, which included five replications of center
points.
Evaluation of Biscuits:
Physical Characteristics:
The average weight and dimension (length,
width, and thickness) of 50 biscuits –divided to 5
groups of 10 biscuits- were measured by placing
them edge to edge and by stacking one above the
other respectively.
The density of biscuits was calculated by
determining the sample mass and volume following
the method of Sai Mnohar & Haridas Rao [11]. The
volume was determined by measuring the external
dimensions. 5 groups of biscuits – each containing
10 biscuits- were measured. All the trials were done
5 times.
Breaking and Compression Strength:
Braking strength of biscuits was measured in a
Texture Analyzer (Testometric M350-10CT, UK)
according to a triple-beam snap technique –also
called three-point break- with a load cell of 50 N,
and a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min. The force
required to break 5 biscuits individually were
recorded and the average value reported
Color:
Surface color of the biscuits was measured using
a Hunter lab (Color Flex Model) and the value of
color difference (ΔE) was calculated.
Statistical Evaluation:
Results were analyzed statistically following
Response Surface Method by the means of Design
Expert soft ware version 7.1.6.
Sensory Evaluation:
Biscuits were evaluated by 35 non-trained
panelists with the method of ranking (Carpenter et
al., 2000). Samples were assessed by their taste,
color and texture
Results and discussion
Effect of fat reduction and DATEM addition on
physical and rheological properties of biscuits is
shown in Table 2.
Biscuit Dimension
Measurement of biscuit thickness showed
significant variation (Fig. 1). It was found that by
reducing fat and DATEM up to certain amount, the
thickness of the biscuits reduced significantly (p
#0.05). The samples produced with high levels of fat
reduction and low levels of DATEM were thinner.
This is in agreement with other researches [13] have
reported that by reducing fat from 20 to 6 percent of
dough weight, thickness of the biscuits increases
significantly. That can be due to development of
gluten network in the dough. Increasing the elasticity
of the dough by fat reduction can be another reason
[13].
3. 2453Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(8): 2451-2458, 2011
Table 1: chemical characteristics of flour
Characteristic1
Chemical
Moisture (%) 9.54
Gluten (%) 23.8
Protein (% of dry matter) 9.5
Ash (% of dry matter) 0.5
Rheological
Farinograph water absorption (%) 59.4
Dough development time (min) 2.3
Dough stability (min) 2.3
Farinograph quality number (BU) 34
1
including 3 replication for each test
Table 2: Changes of physical and rheological properties of biscuits due to fat reduction and DATEM addition
Sample`s number Fat reduction DATEM Widtha
Lengtha
Thicknessa
Weighta
Densitya
Texturea,c
Colora
(%) (%) (mm) (mm) (mm) (g) (gr/Cm3
) (N) (ΔE)
A1 28 0.42 4.50 5.56 0.50 3.88 0.31 16.39 28.89
B2 12 0.50 4.60 5.60 0.57 4.33 0.29 13.87 32.74
C3 44 0.50 4.40 5.65 0.51 3.77 0.30 16.56 29.18
D4 28 0.71 4.50 5.70 0.59 3.86 0.26 10.97 31.82
E5 50.63 0.71 4.50 5.65 0.56 3.70 0.27 12.86 28.08
F6 28 0.71 4.50 5.55 0.60 3.80 0.25 11.88 34.00
G7 5.37 0.71 4.70 5.40 0.54 4.00 0.29 12.26 34.09
H8 28 0.71 4.55 5.55 0.59 3.99 0.27 12.17 32.87
I9 28 0.71 4.50 5.57 0.60 3.80 0.25 11.53 34.30
J10 28 0.71 4.50 5.67 0.60 3.87 0.25 11.16 34.23
K11 44 0.91 4.50 5.65 0.52 3.63 0.28 10.97 30.57
L12 12 0.91 4.60 5.60 0.53 4.06 0.30 9.90 34.26
M13 28 0.99 4.48 5.75 0.55 3.88 0.27 11.82 33.18
O14b - - 4.50 5.55 0.55 4.15 0.29 16.29 33.84
a Including 3 replication for each test
b Data of the last row indicate control sample
c using texture analyzer.
Fig. 1 Effect of fat reduction and DATEM on the thickness of the biscuits (3D and contour plot)
Results showed that the width of the biscuits
decreases by fat reduction respectively (p #0.05), but
DATEM didn’t show significant effect (Fig. 2).
However the length of the biscuits didn’t show
significant variation and that can be due to
machinability effect. Results are in agree with other
researches [13,5]. Conforti et al. have reported that
fat reduction leads to having a dense texture and also
smaller size [5,13] have shown that by decreasing the
amount of fat, spread ration and width of the biscuits
decreases significantly and this is maybe due to
increasing the elasticity of the dough in absence of
sufficient fat [13].
As shown in Fig. 3, the weight of the biscuits
reduced by fat reduction significantly (p # 0.05).
This may be due to the replacement of water with fat
that resulted in harder texture. So it required more
force to break the products as measured by three-
point break. In comparison with fat, the effect of
DATEM was lower in weight changes.
Biscuit Texture:
Hardness of the biscuits which was measured by
a texture analyzer increased significantly by reduction
of fat (p # 0.05), and more force was needed to
crack the biscuits. Many other researches approve
this result [13,5,1,2]. In the other word, reducing the
fat content increases the fracture stress of the
biscuits. In addition, a low amount of fats, or
4. 2454Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(8): 2451-2458, 2011
alternately high water content, makes the dough hard
[12]. As fat prevents the formation of a gluten
network in the dough, hardness can be due to greater
gluten development by decreasing the fat content [11]
However, as can be seen in Fig. 5, using higher
amounts of DATEM partly covered the effect of fat
reduction and resulted in less hardness.
Surface Color:
Surface color, as measured by a Hunter lab was
seen to vary significantly (p # 0.05). Fig. 6 shows
that decreasing the amount of fat results in less color
difference and lighter surface color. These
observations confirm the results reported by other
researchers [11,5]. According to conforti et al. fat
can have some roles in the color of the biscuits [5].
Sensory Evaluation:
After taking the taste panel, results were
analyzed with SPSS soft ware. Samples with fat
reduction of 28 percent and DATEM addition of 0.71
percent were acceptable. Results have shown in
Fig.7.
Desirability:
Calculation of the optimal levels of ingredients
to be used was performed using a multiple response
method called desirability. This optimization method
incorporates desires and priorities for each of the
variables. [6]. Biscuits with darker color (in standard
range), weight, dimensions, density, and crispiness (in
standard range) are preferable. Analyses with RSM
have shown that biscuits with 26.23 percent fat
reduction and 0.81 percent DATEM addition have
the most desirability. The desirability of each
response and combined has shown in fig. 8
Conclusion:
Addition of DATEM affected the quality of fat-
reduced biscuits. Its role was more significant in
some characteristics such as texture which resulted in
less hardness. However it cannot be implied that any
one single ingredient significantly can affect all of
the responses. Results have shown that by choosing
28 percent of fat reduction and 0.71 percent of
DATEM, acceptable biscuits can be produced. This
was in agreement with the results of taste panel tests.
Fig. 2: Effect of fat reduction and DATEM on the width of the biscuits (3D and contour plot)
Fig. 3: Effect of fat reduction and DATEM on the weight of the biscuits (3D and contour plot)
5. 2455Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(8): 2451-2458, 2011
Fig. 4: Effect of fat reduction and DATEM on the density of the biscuits (3D and contour plot)
Fig. 5: Effect of fat reduction and DATEM on the texture of the biscuits (3D and contour plot)
Fig. 6 Effect of fat reduction and DATEM on the color of the biscuits (3D and contour plot)
6. 2456Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(8): 2451-2458, 2011
Fig. 7: Taste panel results. Samples were evaluated by their taste, color and texture via 35 panelists. Numbers
of acceptability are the means of evaluation factors.
Fig. 8: Desirability of responses
References
1. Baltsavias, A. and A. Jurgens, 1997. Factors
affecting fracture properties of short-dough
biscuits. Journal of texture studies., 28: 205-219.
2. Baltsavias, A. and A. Jurgens, 1997. Fracture
properties of short-dough biscuits: effect of
composition. Journal of Cereal Science, 29: 235-
244.
3. Carpenter, R.P., D.H. Lyon and T.A. Hasdell,
2000. Guidelines for sensory analysis in food
product development and quality control (2nd
edition), Maryland: Aspen publication, pp: 44,
45.
4. Conforti Frank, D. and M. Smith Pamela, 1998.
Effects of selected emulsifiers, enzymes and a
carbohydrated-base fat substitute on physical and
sensory characteristics in low-fat muffin.
Economics, 22: 91-96.
5. Conforti Frank, D., A. Charles Stacey and Susan
E. Duncan, 1997. Evaluation of carbohydrated-
based fat replacers in a fat-reduced baking
powder biscuit. Journal of Food Quality, 20:
247-256.
6. Gallagher, E., C.M. O`Brien, A.G.M. Scannell
and E.K. Arendt, 2003. Use of response surface
methodology to produce functional short dough
biscuits. Journal of food engineering, 56: 269-
271.
7. Kaur, A., Singh Gurinder and H. Kaur, 2000.
Studies on use of emulsifiers and hydrocolloids
as fat replacers in baked dough. International
Journal of Food Science and Technology, 37:
250-255.
8. Khalil, A.H., 1998. The influence of
carbohydrated-based fat replacers with and
without emulsifiers on the quality characteristics
of low fat cake. Journal of Plant Foods for
Human Nutrition, 52: 299-313.
9. Manley Duncan, 2000. Technology of Biscuit,
Crackers and Cookies. CRC Press, pp: 151-159.
10. Manley Duncan, 2001. Biscuit, Cracker and
Cookie Recipes for the Food Industry. CRC
Press, pp: 17-21.
11. Manohar, R.S. and P.H. Rao, 1999. Effect of
emulsifiers, fat level and type on the rheological
characteristics of biscuit dough and quality of
7. 2457Adv. Environ. Biol., 5(8): 2451-2458, 2011
biscuits. Journal of Science and Food and
Agriculture, 79: 1223-1231.
12. Perego, P., A. Sordi, R. Guastalli and A.
Converti, 2006. Effect of changes in ingredient
composition on the rheological properties of a
biscuit industry dough. International Journal of
Food Science and Technology, 42: 649-657.
13. Sudha, M.L., A.K. Srivastava, R Vetrimani and
K. Leelavathi, 2006. Fat replacement in soft
dough biscuits: It's implications on dough
rheology and biscuit quality. Journal of Food
Engineering, 80: 922-930.
14. Swanson Ruthann, B., Lou Carden, Ann Parks
and S.sharyl, 1999. Effect of carbohydrated-
based fat substitute and emulsifying agents on
reduced-fat peanut butter cookies. Journal of
Food Quality, 22: 19-29.
15. Zoulias, E.I., V. Oreopoulou and E. Kounalaki,
2002. Effect of fat and sugar replacement on
cookie properties. Journal of Science. and Food
Agriculture, 82: 1637-1644.