Whew – your client has finally made it through the lengthy immigrant visa process. Or she’s nailed the adjustment interview and at long last has her green card in hand. What’s the first thing the client wants to do? Often, they want to pack their bags and go on a trip.How should you advise your clients?
How should you advise your client?
LPRs are permitted to travel abroad. But as is often the case, the devil is in the details. A blasé approach to foreign travel can jeopardize the client’s future ability to naturalize, or even lead to abandonment of LPR status altogether. Moreover, foreign travel can seek especially risky given the current immigration environment.
In this seminar we will cover:
Continuity of residence for purposes of naturalization.
Understanding LPR abandonment – substantive and procedural aspects.
How to advise on the risks of foreign travel in the changing environment of the Trump administration.
3. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
www.soundimmigration.com
America’s web-based
immigration law firm
page 3
4. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
www.soundimmigration.com/events
page 4
5. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
A new (maybe, haven’t decided) project.
page 5
6. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m page 6
Continuity of residence for naturalization1
Abandonment of residency2
Understanding reentry permits3
What do we tell our clients?4
7. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
“Well, it depends.”
…sometimes. And
other times we just
need to be more
precise.
page 7
9. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
These are different concepts!
“Continual residence”
~ For naturalization.
~ Strict statutory
requirements.
~ Black letter law with firm
dates.
~ Subjective intent is
irrelevant.
Abandonment
~ Loss of LPR status.
~ Funky caselaw.
~ Some black letter law, some
firm dates.
~ Subjective intent is
sometimes important.
page 9
10. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Meet N-400 applicant, Kira.
• Husband works for U.S.
government.
• Maintains house inTexas, pays
taxes, current driver’s license.
• Over 13 years as LPR.
• 14-months in Iran while husband
worked there on official trip.
• Files N-400 after return.
Can she natz?
page 10
12. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
CR in USCIS service
district for 3 months
prior to filing
5 (or 3) years CR
immediately prior to
filing N-400
Maintain CR
between N-400
filing and citizenship
oath
Continual residency and naturalization.
page 12
14. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Continual residence rules are black and white!
Time abroad matters.
Subjective intent does not.
page 14
15. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
6 months -> 1 yr.
Presumptive break.
Under 6 months.
No break in CR.
1 year plus.
You’re screwed.
Consequences of single trips abroad.
page 15
16. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Rebutting presumptive break (6 mo -> 1 yr trip)
Evidence that CR wasn’t
broken:
• Continued employment.
• Immediate family in U.S.
• “Full access” to U.S.
“abode.”
• No employment abroad.
page 16
17. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
There are no exceptions with a trip of 1 yr plus!
page 17
18. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
…unless
Qualifying government
employment abroad
~ and ~
Filed N-470 before you
left
page 18
19. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Advising your client.
Ensure they
understand the
black letter rules on
continual residence.
page 19
22. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Not just a matter of timing.
The clients’ activities matter.
page 22
23. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Fleuti doctrine & UNA 101(a)(13)(C)
Normally, returning
LPRs are not “seeking
admission.” Unless…
~ has abandoned or relinquished
LPR status;
~ absent from the U.S. for
continuous period of 180 days or
longer;
~ has engaged in illegal activity after
having departed the United States,
~ left U.S. after NTA;
~ certain criminal offenses; or
~ attempts to EWI.
page 23
24. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
History of
prolonged
absences
Divorce or
separation from
petitioning spouse
Arrival on charter
flight w/ non-
residence.
What catches CBP’s attention?
Employment
abroad
Location of family
members
Payment of taxes
page 24
28. If respondent makes
colorable claim
to LPR status,
government has
burden of “clear,
unequivocal,
and convincing
evidence” that the
status has been
changed or
abandoned
29. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Legal standard
[If not] Was there a continuous,
uninterrupted intention to return to the
United States visit?
Was the absence more than a
“temporary visit abroad?
page 29
30. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Actions showing intent to return.
Factors similar to those
discussed already:
• Family ties;
• Property holdings; and
• Business affiliations
within the United States.
page 30
33. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Prevents LPR abandonment.
So long as the LPR remains not
otherwise inadmissible, she does
not abandon LPR status while
traveling abroad on a valid
reentry permit
page 33
35. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
“Forget” to apply for a reentry permit?
Can apply for a “returning
resident” visa.
page 35
36. What do we tell our clients?
Key points to communicate.
37. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Track your travel.
• Spreadsheet with
travel dates.
• Proof of travel.
page 37
38. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Bring documentation.
• Ties to U.S.
• Rent, utilities.
• Lease.
• License.
• Employment letter.
• Purpose of foreign
visit.
• Store it in the cloud?
page 38
39. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Electronic devices.
• Secure it;
• Wipe it; or
• Don’t bring it.
page 39
40. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
No right to counsel!
Greg Boos, Margaret Stock and
Heather Fathali,Across the Line,
Advocacy at U.S. Ports of Entry
(Feb. 15, 2016), available at
https://www.soundimmigration.
com/across-line-advocacy-u-s-
ports-entry/.
page 40
41. w w w . s o u n d i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m
Should LPRs travel at all?
There is some risk…
but how much?
page 41
42. Anyone have a tip to share?
(Email
greg@soundimmigration.com with
ideas for future webinars)
Editor's Notes
Note the obvious circularity: (1) an absence of 181 days or more automatically breaks presence; (2) the LPR can rebut the presumption that presence was broken; and (3) the way to do that is providing evidence that she did not disrupt continual residence.
Note the obvious circularity: (1) an absence of 181 days or more automatically breaks presence; (2) the LPR can rebut the presumption that presence was broken; and (3) the way to do that is providing evidence that she did not disrupt continual residence.