Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈 ✅ Quality You get an original and high-quality paper based on extensive research. The completed work will be correctly formatted, referenced and tailored to your level of study. ✅ Confidentiality We value your privacy. We do not disclose your personal information to any third party without your consent. Your payment data is also safely handled as you process the payment through a secured and verified payment processor. ✅ Originality Every single order we deliver is written from scratch according to your instructions. We have zero tolerance for plagiarism, so all completed papers are unique and checked for plagiarism using a leading plagiarism detector. ✅ On-time delivery We strive to deliver quality custom written papers before the deadline. That's why you don't have to worry about missing the deadline for submitting your assignment. ✅ Free revisions You can ask to revise your paper as many times as you need until you're completely satisfied with the result. Provide notes about what needs to be changed, and we'll change it right away. ✅ 24/7 Support From answering simple questions to solving any possible issues, we're always here to help you in chat and on the phone. We've got you covered at any time, day or night. Caligula Essay An Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors mapDIR Atlas Gaius (Caligula) (A.D. 37 41) Garrett G. Fagan Pennsylvania State University A Bust of theEmperor Caligula Introduction Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (b. A.D. 12, d. A.D. 41, emperor A.D. 37 41) represents a turning point in the early history of the Principate. Unfortunately, his is the most poorly documented reign of the Julio Claudian dynasty. The literary sources for these four years are meager, frequently anecdotal, and universally hostile.[[1]] As a result, not only are many of the events of the reign unclear, but Gaius himself appears more as a caricature than a real person, a crazed megalomaniac given to capricious cruelty and harebrained schemes. Although some...show more content...[[6]] Modern scholars have pored over these incidents and come up with a variety of explanations: Gaius suffered from an illness; he was misunderstood; he was corrupted by power; or, accepting the ancient evidence, they conclude that he was mad.[[7]] However, appreciating the nature of the ancient sources is crucial when approaching this issue. Their unanimous hostility renders their testimony suspect, especially since Gaius s reported behavior fits remarkably well with that of the ancient tyrant, a literary type enshrined in Greco Roman tradition centuries before his reign. Further, the only eye witness account of Gaius s behavior, Philo s Embassy to Gaius, offers little evidence of outright insanity, despite the antagonism of the author, whom Gaius treated with the utmost disrespect. Rather, he comes across as aloof, arrogant, egotistical, and cuttingly witty but not insane. The best explanation both for Gaius s behavior an

1. Caligula Essay
An Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors mapDIR Atlas
Gaius (Caligula) (A.D. 37–41)
Garrett G. Fagan
Pennsylvania State University
A Bust of theEmperor Caligula
Introduction
Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (b. A.D. 12, d. A.D. 41, emperor A.D. 37
–41) represents a turning point in the early history of the Principate.
Unfortunately, his is the most poorly documented reign of the Julio–Claudian dynasty. The literary sources for these four years are meager, frequently
anecdotal, and universally hostile.[[1]] As a result, not only are many of the events of the reign unclear, but Gaius himself appears more as a caricature
than a real person, a crazed megalomaniac given to capricious cruelty and harebrained schemes. Although some...show more content...
[[6]] Modern scholars have pored over these incidents and come up with a variety of explanations: Gaius suffered from an illness; he was misunderstood;
he was corrupted by power; or, accepting the ancient evidence, they conclude that he was mad.[[7]] However, appreciating the nature of the ancient
sources is crucial when approaching this issue. Their unanimous hostility renders their testimony suspect, especially since Gaius's reported behavior fits
remarkably well with that of the ancient tyrant, a literary type enshrined in Greco–Roman tradition centuries before his reign. Further, the only
eye–witness account of Gaius's behavior, Philo's Embassy to Gaius, offers little evidence of outright insanity, despite the antagonism of the author, whom
Gaius treated with the utmost disrespect. Rather, he comes across as aloof, arrogant, egotistical, and cuttingly witty –– but not insane. The best explanation
both for Gaius's behavior and the subsequent hostility of the sources is that he was an inexperienced young man thrust into a position of unlimited power,
the true nature of which had been carefully disguised by its founder, Augustus. Gaius, however, saw through the disguise and began to act accordingly.
This, coupled with his troubled upbringing and almost complete lack of tact led to behavior that struck his contemporaries as
Get more content on HelpWriting.net