SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Selección Devex del 22-11-13 al 25-11-13
1. Synopsis for End of Project Evaluation for the Competitiveness and Trade Expansion
(COMPETE) Trade Hub Project: Presolicitation United States Agency for International
Development – USAID Status Forecast
Synopsis:
Added: Nov 21, 2013 8:17 am
The purpose of this notice is to comply with the synopses and pre-solicitation notice requirements
of FAR 5.2 - Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions. Any solicitation resulting from this notice will
be handled in accordance with FAR 5.102(d); therefore, availability of any resulting solicitation
package may be limited to this electronic medium.
This is NOT an invitation for Bid (IFB) or a Request for Proposal (RFP) and in no way obligates the
US Government to issue an RFP/IFB and/or award a contract. The information herein below is
released for wide dissemination to all parties and is indicative only. The information is subject to
modification and is in no way binding to government and the estimate is based on the best
information available at this time.
Subject to the availability of funds, the United States Agency for International Development
(USAID) in East Africa, intends to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) on or around December 6,
2013 for a fixed price contract between $160,000 and $300,000 for an End of Project Evaluation
for the Competitiveness and Trade Expansion (COMPETE) Trade Hub Project Under GBTI II No.
EEM-I-00-07-00008-00 Task Order No. EEM-I-05-07-00008 with Chemonics International. The
purpose of this evaluation is to provide USAID/EA and its partners with an independent
assessment of COMPETE project performance, highlighting the major achievements, strengths and
weaknesses in order to learn from it and use the lessons for future regional programming.
Contracting Office Address:
USAID/Nairobi, Kenya
Unit 64102
APO AE
Nairobi, 09831
Kenya
Primary Point of Contact.:
Maria Televantos
mtelevantos@usaid.gov
Phone: 2540208622606
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=847715206b0c64cbe62f86bdc69ce0d
f&tab=core&tabmode=list&=
2. Consultancy Task: Evaluation Management Unit for the Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund
(AECF)

IMPORTANT DATES:
Announced Date November 20, 2013
Proposal Due Date January 06, 2014
General Background
The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), acting on behalf of the African Enterprise
Challenge Fund Committee, seeks to appoint an Evaluation Management Unit (EMU) to carry out
the independent evaluation of the Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund (AECF). The EMU will be
appointed to conduct a Mid-term Evaluation of the AECF in 2014 and a Final Evaluation of the
AECF in 2017 or a later date as determined by the AECF Committee.
Description of the AECF
The AECF is a US$200m challenge fund for agribusiness in Africa. It is a special partnership
initiative of AGRA that supports its vision of “A food secure and prosperous Africa through rapid
smallholder agricultural growth and transformation”. The Fund is hosted by the Alliance for a
Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), based in Nairobi, and is supported by the governments of
Australia, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK as well as the International Fund for
Agricultural Development (IFAD). The Fund Manager (FM) is KPMG Africa Development Advisory
Services and partners. See http://www.aecfafrica.org/
Purpose and Objectives of the evaluation
The purpose of the independent evaluation is to assess the effectiveness (outputs to outcomes) of
the Programme, its achievement of impact and the efficiency (inputs to outputs) of the Fund
Manager in delivering the Programme. However, as this Programme involves deploying a set of
interventions in a number of differing environments, the scope of the evaluation must go beyond
simply assessing implementation. The evaluation will need to reinforce the process of learning
from interventions and test the validity of all components of the theory of change.
Scope
The scope of the evaluation includes all past and planned AECF interventions in all participating
countries. The evaluation work is divided into the following components:
• Evaluation Design Phase in early 2014
• Mid-term Evaluation in 2014
• Final Evaluation in 2017
Application procedures:
Kindly obtain the request for proposal and full terms of reference from the AGRA website:
http://www.agra.org/careers/jobs-careers/request-for-proposals/

Closing date: 6th January 2014 RFP in Dropbox
3. CONTRATACIÓN DE UNA EMPRESA CONSULTORA PARA REALIZAR ESTUDIO DE
DIAGNÓSTICO Y ANÁLISIS DE LA CADENA DE VALOR DE LOS COMBUSTIBLES LÍQUIDOS
EXCEPTO GAS LICUADO
Esta convocatoria de oferta del Ministerio de Industria, Energia y Mineria en Uruguay es una
oportunidad de negocio para empresas españolas con especialización y/o experiencia en trabajos
de similares características al objeto del presente.
http://www.ivexmultilateral.es/convocatorias/ver_convocatoria.php?id=17182
4. Evaluación Programa INADEB-Salud en las Montañas

IMPORTANT DATES:
Announced Date November 19, 2013
Proposal Due Date December 02, 2013
Country/Region:
Dominican Republic

OBJETIVOS DE LA EVALUACIÓN
Tipo de evaluación: final, medición de impacto, externa.
Período que cubre la evaluación: 36 meses entre 2010 y 2013.
Ámbito geográfico: 24 comunidades montañosas de la cuenca alta de los ríos Bao y
Guanajuma de los municipios de Jarabacoa en la provincia de La Vega, y de Jánico, en la
provincia de Santiago, Región Cibao Central de la República Dominicana.
La presente evaluación tiene por objeto la consecución de los siguientes objetivo general y
específico.
Objetivo General:
Elaborar un informe conteniendo conclusiones y recomendaciones sobre las capacidades
institucionales y el impacto producido junto al grado de sostenibilidad conseguido por la
intervención histórica continua de la contraparte seleccionada en el componente del
fortalecimiento de la salud materno-infantil.
Objetivos específicos:
1. Elaborar análisis de capacidades institucionales de la contraparte seleccionada.
2. Elaborar evaluación de impacto de los proyectos ejecutados en las zonas de intervención
de las organizaciones seleccionadas de la consultoría.
3. Establecer recomendaciones con medidas correctoras para garantizar la eficacia y la
eficiencia de los proyectos ejecutados.
Actividades a realizar por objetivo específico
1.1 Análisis capacidades internas de la contraparte seleccionada, a saber, entre otros:
análisis de composición de miembros de la organización, existencia y cumplimiento de
líneas estratégicas propias (planes estratégicos, planes operativos anuales, etc.)
1.2 Análisis de capacidades externas de INADEB, a saber, entre otros: contactos y
afianzamiento de relaciones con los titulares de deberes (autoridades), tanto municipales
propias de las zonas de intervención como las sanitarias pertinentes para las mismas;
relaciones con otras organizaciones de la sociedad civil, relaciones con organizaciones
comunitarias de base, iglesias locales y cualesquiera otro actor relevante involucrado.
2.1 Informe sobre el enraizamiento en la zona de intervención histórica de INADEB, a
varios niveles: comunidad, municipio, provincia. Uso de las necesarias técnicas de
investigación social para el análisis e interpretación de los datos.
3.1 Elaborar informe de recomendaciones para la maximización de la eficacia y la
eficiencia del impacto causado por los proyectos ejecutados para la sostenibilidad de las
acciones.
TDR in Dropbox

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Pfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina Janevska
Pfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina JanevskaPfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina Janevska
Pfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina Janevska
Beyond Philosophy
 
Webinar Bridging The Experience Gap
Webinar Bridging The Experience GapWebinar Bridging The Experience Gap
Webinar Bridging The Experience Gap
Beyond Philosophy
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Pfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina Janevska
Pfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina JanevskaPfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina Janevska
Pfizer Study Tour Presentation - Steven Walden & Kalina Janevska
 
How to accurately estimate the size and effort of your software testing (1)
How to accurately estimate the size and effort of your software testing (1)How to accurately estimate the size and effort of your software testing (1)
How to accurately estimate the size and effort of your software testing (1)
 
Webinar Bridging The Experience Gap
Webinar Bridging The Experience GapWebinar Bridging The Experience Gap
Webinar Bridging The Experience Gap
 
Raspberry Pi 2: Instalación y configuración
Raspberry Pi 2: Instalación y configuraciónRaspberry Pi 2: Instalación y configuración
Raspberry Pi 2: Instalación y configuración
 
TOGA TERAPEUTICO. Modulo para Dolores de Rodilla
TOGA TERAPEUTICO. Modulo para Dolores de RodillaTOGA TERAPEUTICO. Modulo para Dolores de Rodilla
TOGA TERAPEUTICO. Modulo para Dolores de Rodilla
 
Troubleshooting ASP.NET and IIS Scalability Hotspots
Troubleshooting ASP.NET and IIS Scalability HotspotsTroubleshooting ASP.NET and IIS Scalability Hotspots
Troubleshooting ASP.NET and IIS Scalability Hotspots
 

Similar to Selección devex del 22 1 al 25-11-13

AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914
 AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914 AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914
AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914
Nizam Al-Hussainy
 
Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)
Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)
Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)
V-cool Ndayak
 
Abuja-CPPR NE Report 200314final
Abuja-CPPR NE Report 200314finalAbuja-CPPR NE Report 200314final
Abuja-CPPR NE Report 200314final
Gerald Ogoko
 
Monitoring Evaluation And Reporting
Monitoring  Evaluation And  ReportingMonitoring  Evaluation And  Reporting
Monitoring Evaluation And Reporting
irwansyah.yahya
 
1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03
1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03 1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03
1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03
TatianaMajor22
 
15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report
15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report
15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report
Niharica Ogale
 
Cida lessons from evaluations
Cida lessons from evaluationsCida lessons from evaluations
Cida lessons from evaluations
Dr Lendy Spires
 
The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016
The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016
The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016
Dr Lendy Spires
 
Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016
Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016
Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016
Ned Eustace
 
National project OCP|OC information and application booklet
National project OCP|OC information and application bookletNational project OCP|OC information and application booklet
National project OCP|OC information and application booklet
Anastasiia Isakii
 

Similar to Selección devex del 22 1 al 25-11-13 (20)

AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914
 AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914 AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914
AEP-UNDP_ERD_final MTE report 070914
 
CV Nimisha
CV NimishaCV Nimisha
CV Nimisha
 
Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)
Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)
Monitoring evaluation-and-reporting-1299571066-phpapp02 (1)
 
Abuja-CPPR NE Report 200314final
Abuja-CPPR NE Report 200314finalAbuja-CPPR NE Report 200314final
Abuja-CPPR NE Report 200314final
 
Monitoring Evaluation And Reporting
Monitoring  Evaluation And  ReportingMonitoring  Evaluation And  Reporting
Monitoring Evaluation And Reporting
 
1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03
1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03 1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03
1 WORK PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2020-2021 OIG-ERM-19-03
 
Bushfire Preparedness Program 2010/12
Bushfire Preparedness Program 2010/12Bushfire Preparedness Program 2010/12
Bushfire Preparedness Program 2010/12
 
Results Management System for IFAD supported country programmes
Results Management System for IFAD supported country programmesResults Management System for IFAD supported country programmes
Results Management System for IFAD supported country programmes
 
Sandii lewin part_en
Sandii lewin part_enSandii lewin part_en
Sandii lewin part_en
 
Award Letter | HKU Global Partnership Seed Fund
Award Letter | HKU Global Partnership Seed FundAward Letter | HKU Global Partnership Seed Fund
Award Letter | HKU Global Partnership Seed Fund
 
Selma_CV1
Selma_CV1Selma_CV1
Selma_CV1
 
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
E-PASS Inception Project Management and OversightE-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
E-PASS Inception Project Management and Oversight
 
GF TADs Seminar On National Project Proposals
GF TADs Seminar On National Project ProposalsGF TADs Seminar On National Project Proposals
GF TADs Seminar On National Project Proposals
 
MindLab's UNDP Knowledge and Innovation evaluation
MindLab's UNDP Knowledge and Innovation evaluationMindLab's UNDP Knowledge and Innovation evaluation
MindLab's UNDP Knowledge and Innovation evaluation
 
15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report
15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report
15020243019_NiharicaOgale_Final_Report
 
Cida lessons from evaluations
Cida lessons from evaluationsCida lessons from evaluations
Cida lessons from evaluations
 
Streamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
Streamlining Financial Statement DisclosuresStreamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
Streamlining Financial Statement Disclosures
 
The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016
The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016
The One Bank Result Measurement Framework 2013-2016
 
Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016
Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016
Eustace_Ned_CV_09_2016
 
National project OCP|OC information and application booklet
National project OCP|OC information and application bookletNational project OCP|OC information and application booklet
National project OCP|OC information and application booklet
 

Selección devex del 22 1 al 25-11-13

  • 1. Selección Devex del 22-11-13 al 25-11-13 1. Synopsis for End of Project Evaluation for the Competitiveness and Trade Expansion (COMPETE) Trade Hub Project: Presolicitation United States Agency for International Development – USAID Status Forecast Synopsis: Added: Nov 21, 2013 8:17 am The purpose of this notice is to comply with the synopses and pre-solicitation notice requirements of FAR 5.2 - Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions. Any solicitation resulting from this notice will be handled in accordance with FAR 5.102(d); therefore, availability of any resulting solicitation package may be limited to this electronic medium. This is NOT an invitation for Bid (IFB) or a Request for Proposal (RFP) and in no way obligates the US Government to issue an RFP/IFB and/or award a contract. The information herein below is released for wide dissemination to all parties and is indicative only. The information is subject to modification and is in no way binding to government and the estimate is based on the best information available at this time. Subject to the availability of funds, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in East Africa, intends to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) on or around December 6, 2013 for a fixed price contract between $160,000 and $300,000 for an End of Project Evaluation for the Competitiveness and Trade Expansion (COMPETE) Trade Hub Project Under GBTI II No. EEM-I-00-07-00008-00 Task Order No. EEM-I-05-07-00008 with Chemonics International. The purpose of this evaluation is to provide USAID/EA and its partners with an independent assessment of COMPETE project performance, highlighting the major achievements, strengths and weaknesses in order to learn from it and use the lessons for future regional programming. Contracting Office Address: USAID/Nairobi, Kenya Unit 64102 APO AE Nairobi, 09831 Kenya Primary Point of Contact.: Maria Televantos mtelevantos@usaid.gov Phone: 2540208622606 https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=847715206b0c64cbe62f86bdc69ce0d f&tab=core&tabmode=list&=
  • 2. 2. Consultancy Task: Evaluation Management Unit for the Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund (AECF) IMPORTANT DATES: Announced Date November 20, 2013 Proposal Due Date January 06, 2014 General Background The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), acting on behalf of the African Enterprise Challenge Fund Committee, seeks to appoint an Evaluation Management Unit (EMU) to carry out the independent evaluation of the Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund (AECF). The EMU will be appointed to conduct a Mid-term Evaluation of the AECF in 2014 and a Final Evaluation of the AECF in 2017 or a later date as determined by the AECF Committee. Description of the AECF The AECF is a US$200m challenge fund for agribusiness in Africa. It is a special partnership initiative of AGRA that supports its vision of “A food secure and prosperous Africa through rapid smallholder agricultural growth and transformation”. The Fund is hosted by the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), based in Nairobi, and is supported by the governments of Australia, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK as well as the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The Fund Manager (FM) is KPMG Africa Development Advisory Services and partners. See http://www.aecfafrica.org/ Purpose and Objectives of the evaluation The purpose of the independent evaluation is to assess the effectiveness (outputs to outcomes) of the Programme, its achievement of impact and the efficiency (inputs to outputs) of the Fund Manager in delivering the Programme. However, as this Programme involves deploying a set of interventions in a number of differing environments, the scope of the evaluation must go beyond simply assessing implementation. The evaluation will need to reinforce the process of learning from interventions and test the validity of all components of the theory of change. Scope The scope of the evaluation includes all past and planned AECF interventions in all participating countries. The evaluation work is divided into the following components: • Evaluation Design Phase in early 2014 • Mid-term Evaluation in 2014 • Final Evaluation in 2017
  • 3. Application procedures: Kindly obtain the request for proposal and full terms of reference from the AGRA website: http://www.agra.org/careers/jobs-careers/request-for-proposals/ Closing date: 6th January 2014 RFP in Dropbox 3. CONTRATACIÓN DE UNA EMPRESA CONSULTORA PARA REALIZAR ESTUDIO DE DIAGNÓSTICO Y ANÁLISIS DE LA CADENA DE VALOR DE LOS COMBUSTIBLES LÍQUIDOS EXCEPTO GAS LICUADO Esta convocatoria de oferta del Ministerio de Industria, Energia y Mineria en Uruguay es una oportunidad de negocio para empresas españolas con especialización y/o experiencia en trabajos de similares características al objeto del presente. http://www.ivexmultilateral.es/convocatorias/ver_convocatoria.php?id=17182 4. Evaluación Programa INADEB-Salud en las Montañas IMPORTANT DATES: Announced Date November 19, 2013 Proposal Due Date December 02, 2013 Country/Region: Dominican Republic OBJETIVOS DE LA EVALUACIÓN Tipo de evaluación: final, medición de impacto, externa. Período que cubre la evaluación: 36 meses entre 2010 y 2013. Ámbito geográfico: 24 comunidades montañosas de la cuenca alta de los ríos Bao y Guanajuma de los municipios de Jarabacoa en la provincia de La Vega, y de Jánico, en la provincia de Santiago, Región Cibao Central de la República Dominicana. La presente evaluación tiene por objeto la consecución de los siguientes objetivo general y específico. Objetivo General: Elaborar un informe conteniendo conclusiones y recomendaciones sobre las capacidades institucionales y el impacto producido junto al grado de sostenibilidad conseguido por la
  • 4. intervención histórica continua de la contraparte seleccionada en el componente del fortalecimiento de la salud materno-infantil. Objetivos específicos: 1. Elaborar análisis de capacidades institucionales de la contraparte seleccionada. 2. Elaborar evaluación de impacto de los proyectos ejecutados en las zonas de intervención de las organizaciones seleccionadas de la consultoría. 3. Establecer recomendaciones con medidas correctoras para garantizar la eficacia y la eficiencia de los proyectos ejecutados. Actividades a realizar por objetivo específico 1.1 Análisis capacidades internas de la contraparte seleccionada, a saber, entre otros: análisis de composición de miembros de la organización, existencia y cumplimiento de líneas estratégicas propias (planes estratégicos, planes operativos anuales, etc.) 1.2 Análisis de capacidades externas de INADEB, a saber, entre otros: contactos y afianzamiento de relaciones con los titulares de deberes (autoridades), tanto municipales propias de las zonas de intervención como las sanitarias pertinentes para las mismas; relaciones con otras organizaciones de la sociedad civil, relaciones con organizaciones comunitarias de base, iglesias locales y cualesquiera otro actor relevante involucrado. 2.1 Informe sobre el enraizamiento en la zona de intervención histórica de INADEB, a varios niveles: comunidad, municipio, provincia. Uso de las necesarias técnicas de investigación social para el análisis e interpretación de los datos. 3.1 Elaborar informe de recomendaciones para la maximización de la eficacia y la eficiencia del impacto causado por los proyectos ejecutados para la sostenibilidad de las acciones. TDR in Dropbox