1. Cultural
Thai Culture is lively and vibrant
and varies based on the region.
Within the first week, our group
visited the Erawan National
Forest and trekked up a seven
layer waterfall. Not far from the
park was an animal sanctuary
where we fed tiger cubs and
giraffes. The biodiversity in the
north is dense yet broad. In
Bangkok, there is an effort to teach
the history of the Thai culture both to visitors and locals alike. At Sampran
Riverside we learned dance, craft and history alike. We volunteered at Friends
for All Children, an orphanage in Bangkok, where we played with the kids and
helped feed them. With a group from Chulalongkorn, we explored the old
capital city Ayutthaya and aided in cleaning an old lab that was located in the
region. We made our own food, Thai cookout style and played games with
new friends.
Hypothesis
The higher concentrations of medicines in the fermentation batch reactions will
increase the sucrose consumption due to their antibiotic properties reducing
competing bacterial contaminants and allowing the yeast to grow and perform at its
most efficient rate.
Conclusions
There are additional tests that must be performed in order to
differentiate the sucrose consumed by the yeast and by infectious
bacterial contaminants. This data would serve to further analyze
the effectiveness of the medicines used in the experiment and
could then pose as recommendations to fuel ethanol industries
looking to enhance their efficiency.
Discussion
• The increased consumption of sucrose as evident in the graph
of controls with the positive control suggests that the less
bacterial contaminants, the more the yeast cells are able to
consume the sucrose energy source and the more ethanol
would be produced. This is also supported by the trend that
the higher concentrations of Robenz and Avatec show a
greater decrease in sucrose concentration over time.
• Bacterial contaminants do use the sucrose energy source so it
is important to run further tests on ethanol concentrations
would give direct evidence as to the productivity of the yeast
cultures.
• The higher concentrations
of treatment correlated
with lass bacterial growth,
but also reduced the
growth of yeast making it
important to increase
sample size.
Results
Objectives and Methods
• To improve production efficiency through application
of antibiotics and allow ethanol to better compete in
the energy economy.
1. Agar slant Preparation
2. Stock culture preparation
3. Medium preparation
4. Cell cultivation and harvesting
5. Batch fermentation
6. Sugar analysis preparation
7. Sample treatment I & II (DNS analysis)
Materials
Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA)
70% isopropyl alcohol
Sugar cane molasses
Ammonium Sulfate
NaOH
HCl
DNS reagent
Avatec® - Lasalocid Sodium 15 %
Cygro® - Maduramicin Ammonium 1%
Robenz® - Robenidine Hydrochloride 6.6 %
Elancoban 200® - Monesine Sodium 20 %
S. cerevisiae M30
TOMY SS-325 autoclave
ISSCO VS-124 laminar flow hood
Innova 4330 refrigerated incubation shaker
Vortex mixer
Centrifuge
Spectrometer
Abstract
This study analyzes the effect of medicines commonly used in poultry farming on
ethanol fermentation of sugar cane molasses in batch reactions to improve
production efficiency and allow ethanol to better compete in the energy economy
as an alternative to fossil fuels. Bacterial infection in the industrial production
facilities causes yeast to compete for energy and produces degrading bi-products.
Avatec (lasalocid sodium), Cygro (maduramicin ammonium), Robenz (robenidine
hydrochloride), and Elancoban (monesine sodium) that serve as anticoccidials or
coccidiostats were tested in 250 ml batches for fermentation of S. cervisiae using
sugar cane molasses as the food stock for 72 hours at 33°C and 36°C. Of Avatec and
Robenz, the sucrose concentration decrease over time and little discernable
differences occurred due to treatment concentration or temperature. The bacterial
growth was minimized with samples Robenz 100 ppm/L at both 33°C and 36°C,
Avatec 1000 ppm/L at 33°C and Avatec 100 ppm/L at 36°C. However, the higer
concentrations of medication resulted in fewer yeast cultures.
Acknowledgements
The Chulalongkorn University Faculty and Frank Alexis are gratefully
acknowledged for the organization of this research experience and the
Clemson University Calhoun Honors College is gratefully acknowledged for
the encouragement to go abroad through the distribution of a travel grant.
MEDICINE
TYPE
CONCENTRATION
PPM/L
MASS
[G]
21% W/V
MOLASSE
[ML]
%5 CELL
[ML]
AVATEC 1000 0.2375 237.5 12.5
500 0.1188 237.5 12.5
200 0.0475 237.5 12.5
100 0.0238 237.5 12.5
CYGRO 50 0.0119 237.5 12.5
20 0.0048 237.5 12.5
10 0.0024 237.5 12.5
5 0.0012 237.5 12.5
ROBENZ 300 0.0713 237.5 12.5
100 0.0238 237.5 12.5
40 0.0095 237.5 12.5
20 0.0048 237.5 12.5
MONESINE 100 0.0238 237.5 12.5
20 0.0048 237.5 12.5
10 0.0024 237.5 12.5
5 0.0012 237.5 12.5
CONTROL - - 237.5 12.5
POS.
CONTROL
- - 237.5 12.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 20 40 60 80
SucroseConcentrationw/v[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Controls 33°C
Control
0
10
20
30
0 20 40 60 80
SucroseConcentrationw/v[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Avatec 33°C
A 100
A 200
A 500
Bacterial Control in Ethanol Fermentation Batch Reactions
Timothy Karmilovich, Elena Miyasato, Pornpicha Palm, Dr. Muenduen Phisalaphong, Jaygita Wikranvanich
Clemson University Department of Bioengineering, Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Chemical Engineering
ChemicalMicrobialIndustrial
0
10
20
30
40
50
Bacterialcount[cfu/ml·102]
Treatment
Bacterial Growth in Batch Reations
TVC 33°
TVC 36°
2. Bacterial Control in Ethanol
Fermentation:
Using chemical medicines to improve process efficiency
Elena Miyasato
Advised by Professor Muenduen Phisalaphong
3. Introduction
Ethanol as an alternative energy source
Utility and application
Competition in modern economy
Bacterial contaminants decrease efficiency
Potential for application of antibiotics
http://www.cappersfarmer.com/-/media/Images/CFR/Editorial/Articles/Online-Articles/1991/08-01/Making-
Molasses/Sugar-Cane-jpg.jpg?h=589&la=en&w=400&hash=DFAC5D5D05506E568C0A0794B4B365C3F20DC0BD
5. Objectives
Effect of antibiotics on ethanol production
Type, Temperature, Concentration
Use the data to support company advertisement
Effect of environment on sucrose concentration and cell growth
Time, Type, Temperature, Concentration
Use the data to compare with further testing
6. Background & Hypothesis
S. cerevisiae
Hypothesis:
The higher concentrations of medicines in the fermentation batch reactions will increase
the sucrose consumption due to their antibiotic properties reducing competing bacterial
contaminants and allowing the yeast to grow and perform at its most efficient rate.
http://sciencegeist.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/fermentation.png
7. Methods: Overview
Scope of Experiment:
Agar slant Preparation
Cell cultivation and harvesting
Stock culture preparation
Medium preparation
Batch fermentation
Sugar analysis preparation
Sample treatment I & II
10. Methods: Sample Treatment
Hydrolyzed in acid solution using HCl
Separate glucose and fructose
3,5 Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) reagent gets reduced
3-amino-5-nitro-salicylic acid (ANS)
Absorption spectrum 500-540nm
11. Results: Standards
y = 32.091x
R² = 0.9958
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
ConcentrationofSucrose(%w/v)
Absorbance of 520 nm Light (%)
Standard Curve of Surcrose
12. Results: Sucrose Concentration 33°C
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
SucroseConcentrationw/v[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Robenz 33°C
R 20 R 40 R 100 R 300
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 20 40 60 80
SucroseConcentrationw/v[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Avatec 33°C
A 100 A 200 A 500 A 1000
0
10
20
30
0 20 40 60 80
SucroseConcentrationw/v[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Controls 33°C
Control Positive Control
13. Results: Sucrose Concentration 36°C
0.000
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
0 20 40 60 80
SucroseConcentrationw/v[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Robenz 36°C
R 20 R 40 R 100 R 300
0.000
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
0 20 40 60 80
SucroseConcentrationw/v[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Avatec 36°C
A 100 A 200 A 500 A 1000
0.000
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
0 20 40 60 80
SucroseConcentrationw/w[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
Controls 36°C
Control Positive Control
14. Results: Robenz vs Avatec 33°C & 36°C
0.000
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
SucroseConcentrationw/w[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
36°C Sucrose Concentrations
R 20 R 40
R 100 R 300
A 100 A 200
A 500 A 1000
Control Positive Control
0.000
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
SucroseConcentrationw/w[%]
Fermentation Time [hours]
33°C Sucrose Concentrations
R 20 R 40
R 100 R 300
A 100 A 200
A 500 A 1000
Control Positive Control
18. Discussion
Less sucrose = more growth
Limited to the cell counts after 72 hours
Potential for acidity testing throughout
Temperature
No conclusive effect on bacteria count
Yeast grew more at higher temperature
Positive Control
The ultimate goal.
19. Conclusions
Conclusive
Sucrose decreased over time
The tested Avatec prevented more bacterial contamination than Robenz
Yeast growth is augmented at 36°C compared to 33°C
Require further testing
Ethanol concentrations over time
Bacterial and yeast growth over time
Greater quantity of medicine concentrations
Greater variance in temperature
20. References
Kelly A. Skinner, Timothy D. Leathers. “Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.” Journal of
Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology (2004): Volume 31, Number 9, Page 401
Aquarone, Eugênio. “Penicillin and Tetracycline as Contamination Control Agents in Alcoholic Fermentation
of Sugar Cane Molasses.” Applied Microbiology 8.5 (1960): 263–268. Print.
Vinay Kant et al. “Anticoccidial Drugs Used in the Poultry: An Overview.” Science International
(2013). Volume 1, Issue 7 “Anticoccidial Drugs.” KTT Projects.University of Guelph. 2012. Web. 30 July 2017.
Y. Lin, W. Zhang, C. Li, et al. “Factors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces
cerevisiae BY4742.” Biomass- Bioenergy, 47 (2012), pp. 395-401
Wang, Nam Sun. “Sucrose Assay by the Dinitrosalicylic Colorimetric Method”. University of Maryland. Web.
23 July 2017. <http://eng.umd.edu/~nsw/ench485/lab9d.htm>
22. Thank you to Professor Muenduen, Palm, Jan, Timothy, Dr. Alexis for their guidance, teaching,
teamwork, collaboration and organization during this incredible experience.
Editor's Notes
This presentation is on the bacteria; control in ethanol fermentation and how chemical medicines could be used to improve efficiency
The importance of energy is ever growing as our population and technology demands increase
Ethanol is a viable althernative to petroleum and coal based fuel sources and necessary as socital pressure and accessability make fossil fuels it harder to come by
They can be used withing our normal infrastructure with minimal changes because we have built our society around liquid fuels.
Environmental impact is lessened
It is currently expensive to produce so struggles in competition with cheaper fuels
In order to make it more cometative we must address bacterial contaminants. An attempt to increase efficiency.
Properties stem from the presence of hydroxyl group and short carbon chain. Hydroxyl can participate in carbon bonding and
Working with the first half of this production diagram.
Places where bacterial contaminants could enter the system- input of yeast, nutrients, or water recycle input.
Causes flocculation in the fermentation tanks of the yeast. Increases the acidity- reducing productivity of the culture. Uses energy source
This is a typical flow diagram for industrially produced ethanol from a molasses sugar source. In this experiment the focus is on this half of this diagram as that is where the fermentation reaction is happening.
There is potential for contamination of this process predominantly in the sopts where the yeast cultures are inttroduced ( or recycled into the systems from previous batches) and where the nutrients are added- this could be the molasses, the Nitrogen source
-our over arching goal is to see how well these antibiotics work- at what temperatures- and what concentrations
Which ones were the most effective so the companies that produce them could report on our findings and make the best products.
Time restraint changed the objective to be
How does the antibiotic affect the sucrose consumption
How does that relate to the ethanol productivity
Fermentation of s. cerevisiae – make ethanol, carbon dioxide, glycerol, and cell biomass.
The glucose undergoes glycolysis and then fermentation to ethanol.
But bacteria consume glucose and mighte produce ethanol but also lactic acid- which serves as an inhibitor to fermentation reaction.
Avatec® - Lasalocid Sodium 15 %
Cygro® - Maduramicin Ammonium 1%
Robenz® - Robenidine Hydrochloride 6.6 %
Elancoban 200® - Monesine Sodium 20 %
Positive control. Sterilized before inoculation. Any contamination with medium could be differentiated by controls but could be contamination by inoculation.
S cervisia otherwiase known as bakers yeast is used by bakers, brewers, fuel producers alike primarily due to its relatively high fermentation rate. And ability to ferment is low to high sugar concentrations
Ph 4-5
Temperatures 30-45
Lactic acid bacteria are the bacteria in which infect the fermentation reaction and decrease efficiency
This is due to consumption of the same sugar and the production of lactic acid which acts as an inhibitor to the yeast fermentation.
Sucrose is the only non reducing disaccharide
So must turn to monosaccharide.
This is done by reacting with acid that seperates the glucose and fructose.
Then the DNS reagent is reduced by the monosaccharides and becomes ANS- a compound that absorbs light at wavelength 500-540.
The absorbance was measured at 520 nm.
Standard curve to get the relation between the sucrose concentration and absorbance. Diluted samples of know sucrose concentration.
Decreasing at decreasing rate.
It appeared that the higher concentrations showed a greater decrease in sucrose concentration.
The positive control showed greater decrease in sucrose. Support the hypothesis but unsure of the bacteria vs yeast consumption.
At 36 degress the higher concentrations seemed to have the lowest sucrose concentrations.
But towards the end of sampling, the concentrations went up. Could be due to the shelf life of DNS-
33 vs 36. the 33 showed greater decrease in sucrose concentration, the rise in 36 is evident and further testing must be done to make conclusions.
The starting concentrations should be 20% sucrose but vary, also suggesting that the medium solution was not homogeneous.
Exhibits the difference in trends- steep decline at 33 degrees and the slows down immediately
36 longer decline and then goes back up- DNS reagent
Serial dilutions. Sent to another lab where thay did bacterial and yeast counts.
The temperature did not appear to influence the bacteria count.
Robenz. Both 33 and 36 R 100 showed the least bacteria growth.
Avatec 1000 and 100 showed the lowest .
The positive control is the goal. Anything higher than the control means that there was some benefit to the bacteria by that concentration of medicine.
The ideal situation is to have a compound that shows little bacteria and abundant yeast.
Temperature played a large role in the growth of yeast.
R100 at both showed little bacteria but also little yeast. A 100 and 1000 show the least yeast. This suggests that the madicines also impeded the growth of yeast. Rather than let the flourish due to less bacterial competition.
Sucrose concentrations- need further testing of cell counts through out the time scale to make any conclusion that sucrose and growth are correlated.
The temperature The growth at 36 was 100 times that at 33 for the yeast. Despite this count. The sucrose consumption tests did not show such a difference So ethanol testing needs to be done to see if the increase in yeast cells produced more ethanol.