Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
ABC1 - O. Pagani - State-of-the-art HT treatment in ER+ disease
1. Is there a
State-of-the-art Endocrine
Therapy for ER+ HER2- MBC?
Olivia Pagani
Institute of
Oncology of
Southern
Switzerland
2. “Mostly” agreed indications
• Luminal A and B MBC
• Indolent disease (RFI)
• Low tumour burden/oligosymptomatic
Pitfalls
• Change in hormone expression
• Non homogeneous population:
Patients relapsing after Adj Tam (so few?)
Patients relapsing after Adj TAM and AIs
• Endpoints/subsequent therapies
3.
4. Complex scenarios
1.1°-line ET
2.2° line ET
3.Beyond the 2° line…(no man’s land…)
4.Postmenopausal
Pre and perimenopausal
• Patients relapsing under Adj ET
Intrinsic/acquired resistance
• Role and timing of Chemotherapy
6. ORR
Significant difference in favouring AIs over TAM
ORR (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.07; P .002) and
CB (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.24-2.33; P .0009)
Hong-Bin Xu et al Clinical Breast Cancer 11 (4); 246, 2011
7. OS
Trend toward an improved OS not significant
(OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.88-4.30; P .10).
Hong-Bin Xu et al Clinical Breast Cancer 11 (4); 246, 2011
11. FIRST: Study design
Randomization (1:1), open-label first-
line ER+ postmenopausal patients with
advanced breast cancer
(target, n=200; actual, n=205) Endpoints at primary DCO
Primary endpoint
Clinical benefit rate
Secondary endpoints
Fulvestrant 500 mg Anastrozole 1 mg Objective response rate
(500 mg IM on Days (1 mg PO daily) Time to progression
0, 14, and 28, and every 28 Duration of response
days thereafter) Duration of clinical benefit
Safety
Exploratory endpoints
Progression Progression Best response to
subsequent therapy
Follow-up Follow-up No Prior ET for ABC
Adj ET ≥ 12 months
DCO = data cut-off Robertson JF et al. Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl): abstract S1-3
17. AI as 2°-line therapy
• Significant benefit in terms of
OS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96)
• But not for
PFS (HR 1.08, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.31)
CB (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14)
OR (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14).
• This is difficult to interpret due to the
extreme heterogeneity across AIs for
PFS but not the other endpoints.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007
21. Relapse on adjuvant
ET or within 1 year
from completion of
adjuvant ET
Relapse >1 year from
completion of
adjuvant ET or
de novo MBC
after 1° line with either
an antiestrogen or AI
24. ANA +LH-RH TAM +LH-RH P-value
Monica Castiglione ESM0 2011
25. 1°-Line Phase II Parallel Group Study
Premenopausal MBC Pts
Treated With Letrozole Plus Goserelin and
Postmenopausal Pts Treated With Letrozole
TTP (P .89) OS (P .76)
73 patients overall In Hae Park, JCO 28:2705, 2010
27. Is it worthwhile?
• New drugs and approaches!
Trials needed!
• When switching to CT?
• When “only” palliative care?
• Old drugs:
High dose AIs
Megestrol acetate
High dose estrogens
• QoL issues!
28. Pharmaco-economics
Cost of 6 months’ therapy with:
• Tamoxifen 75 Eu
• Megace 400 Eu
• Anastrozole 1.025 Eu
• Letrozole 1.043 Eu
• Exemestane 1.050 Eu
• Fulvestrant 250mg 3.762 Eu
Prue Francis Berlin 2010
29. Conclusions
• No “universal” standards
• Many questions still open
• Patients’ preferences
• QoL issues underscored
• New endpoints important in indolent
disease
• Integration with supportive care