This document contains forward-looking statements about Dorian LPG's business strategies and future prospects that are based on certain assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from expectations if any of the underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or are not realized. Dorian LPG qualifies all forward-looking statements by cautioning that its actual future results may differ from expectations. The document also provides an overview of Dorian LPG's fleet, management team, the Helios LPG Pool partnership, and the global LPG market fundamentals and supply dynamics.

1. February 2018
DORIAN LPG®

2. Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements including analyses and other information based on
forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable and statements relating to our future
prospects, developments and business strategies. Forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms
and phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,”
“project,” “will” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions. The forward-looking
statements in this presentation are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon
further assumptions, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, data
contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions
were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and
contingencies that are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we
will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections.
Actual results could differ materially from expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements if one or
more of the underlying assumptions or expectations proves to be inaccurate or is not realized. Our actual future
results may be materially different from and worse than what we expect. We qualify all of the forward-looking
statements by these cautionary statements. We caution readers of this presentation not to place undue reliance
on forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained herein are made only as of the date of
this presentation, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as
a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Disclaimer
2

3. Dorian LPG at a glance
3
Company overview Global presence
Average vessel age vs. global fleet1
• Dorian LPG is a liquefied petroleum gas shipping
company and a leading owner and operator of modern
very large gas carriers (“VLGCs”).
• The Company was established in 2013 in connection
with placing a large order of newbuildings at Hyundai
HI. Predecessors have invested in and managed LPG
vessels since 2002.
• The fleet is comprised of 19 ECO-VLGCs and 3 modern
VLGCs, with an average age of 4.1 years.
• 18 of the vessels are currently employed in the Helios
LPG Pool, founded by the Company together with
Phoenix Tankers in Apr-2015.
• The remaining vessels are on time charter contracts to
major companies.
• The Company provides in-house commercial and
technical management services for all of the vessels in
the fleet, including vessels owned by Dorian LPG
deployed in the Helios LPG Pool.
• Dorian LPG was listed on the NYSE in 2014 under the
ticker “LPG”. The Company has a market cap of USD
~437m as of 7-February-2018
(1) As of 8-Feb-2018
4.14
9.05
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
DLPG Fleet Global fleet

4. History / background
4
Predecessor entities
entered the LPG
market in 2002 by
acquiring two
pressurized vessels
Dorian LPG Ltd. established
(2013) and the Company listed
on NYSE (2014). Dorian LPG
raised USD 6882 million in four
rounds from Jul-13 to May-14
Number of
vessels1
Dorian LPG announced delivery of
its last ECO-VLGC newbuilding,
the Caravelle and sale of the
Grendon, its last remaining 5,000
cbm pressurized gas carrier
Part of predecessor entities Dorian LPG
First VLGC, Captain
Markos NL, was
delivered
(1) Total LPG vessels on the water; (2) Gross proceeds
1
4
5 5
6
5
6 6
5
4 4 4
6
22 22 22
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

5. Experienced management team
5
John Hadjipateras
Chairman & CEO
(Dorian LPG Ltd)
With Dorian LPG since inception in 2013.
Involved with shipping management since
1972. Experience from Peninsular
Maritime, Eagle Ocean, Greek Shipping
Corp. Committee, SEACOR and more
John Lycouris
CEO
(Dorian LPG USA)
With the Company since 2013. Holds strong
experience from Peninsular Maritime and
Eagle Ocean. Responsibilities include oversight
of the entire newbuilding program and teams
in Greece, the UK and the US
Costas Markakis
President & CEO
(Dorian LPG Management)
Shipping and legal background with more
than 30 years experience in executive and
top management positions in ship
management companies (commercialand
operational)
Theodore B. Young
CFO
(Dorian LPG Ltd)
Joined Dorian LPG at inception in 2013.
Previous experience include Head of
Corporate Development at Eagle Ocean
and the buyout firms Irving Place Capital
and Harvest Partners
Alex Hadjipateras
EVP Bus. Devel.
(Dorian LPG USA)
Joined Dorian LPG in 2013 focusing on
business development. Previously
responsible for Aframax and VLGC
newbuilding at Eagle Ocean, and business
development at Avenue A / Razorfish

6. The Helios LPG Pool
6
• The Helios LPG Pool (the “Pool”) was established in April 2015 as a 50-50 partnership between Dorian LPG and Phoenix Tankers, a subsidiary of MOL of
Japan
• The Pool is comprised of 18 Dorian LPG VLGCs and 4 Phoenix VLGCs, and uses these high-quality assets to offer a complete global LPG maritime solution
offering spot freight, TCs, and COAs1
• Earnings are allocated to each vessel participating in the Pool based on “Pool Points”, which are awarded to each vessel on the basis of characteristics such
as carrying capacity and speed/consumption
(1) Pool vessel composition is accurate as of 2/8/2018.

7. Type Name CBM Delivered Yard Flag
ECO VLGC CARAVELLE 84,000 2016 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CHALLENGER 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC COPERNICUS 84,000 2015 Daewoo SME Bahamas
ECO VLGC CHAPARRAL 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC COMMANDER 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CRATIS 84,000 2015 Daewoo SME Bahamas
ECO VLGC CHEYENNE 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CLERMONT 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CONSTELLATION 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CRESQUES 84,000 2015 Daewoo SME Bahamas
ECO VLGC COMMODORE 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CONSTITUTION 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CONTINENTAL 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC COBRA 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CONCORDE 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC COUGAR 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CORVETTE 84,000 2015 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC CORSAIR 84,000 2014 Hyundai HI Bahamas
ECO VLGC COMET 84,000 2014 Hyundai HI Bahamas
Modern VLGC CAPTAIN NICHOLAS ML 82,000 2008 Hyundai HI Bahamas
Modern VLGC CAPTAIN JOHN NP 82,000 2007 Hyundai HI Bahamas
Modern VLGC CAPTAIN MARKOS NL 82,000 2006 Hyundai HI Bahamas
Premium fleet
7
Fleet overview Comments
The Company owns and operates 19 ECO-
VLGCs and 3 modern VLGCs
Average fleet age of 4.1 years
16 of the 22 vessels already equipped with
Ballast Water Treatment Systems
2 of the 22 vessels already equipped with
scrubbers, and an additional 17 are
“scrubber ready”
Captain Markos NL and Captain John NP
have recently completed 10 year special
surveys
In-house technical and commercial
management of fleet
18 vessels operate under spot, COA or Time
Charter contracts of less than 24 months in
the Helios Pool. Remaining 4 vessels on
Time Charter contracts
All newbuilds delivered and no remaining
newbuilding related capital expenditures
*
*Operated pursuant to Bareboat Lease from Japanese Owners
*

8. 14%
58%
6%
8%
14%
Daewoo
Hyundai
Jiangnan
Kawasaki
MHI Nagasaki
Vessels built at premium Korean Shipyards
8
Total VLGC newbuilding deliveries by shipyard 2006-2017 Comments
• The Korean yards Hyundai HI (“HHI”)
and Daewoo SME (“DSME”) are two of
the world's leading shipbuilders
• Dorian LPG and it predecessors have
built 24 vessels at HHI since 2004 and
maintain a strong relationship with its
shipyards
• LPG vessels are highly engineered, and
exacting technical specifications
determine commercial acceptance
• HHI and DSME also design and build
some of the world’s most complex
offshore vessels and rigs
HHI is the most active and
experienced yard in the
design and construction of
gas carriers

9. LPG Fundamentals
9
Hundreds of millions of people around the
world use LPG at home for applications such
as cooking and heating.
LPG is the preferred alternative automotive
transportation fuel and is increasingly being
used as a marine fuel.
Millions of businesses rely on LPG. It is the
ideal fuel choice for businesses that are not
connected to an existing electrical grid.
Farmers across the world rely on LPG to
meet the challenge of staying competitive in
the modern agricultural environment
Industries such as aerosol, refrigeration, and
chemical feedstock all look to LPG to
provide sustainable fuel alternatives
What is LPG?
Liquefied petroleum gas ("LPG") is
a fossil fuel made during natural
gas processing and oil refining. LPG
is a by product of both oil and
natural gas production and more
than two-thirds of the LPG people
use is extracted directly from the
earth. The rest of it is
manufactured indirectly from
crude oil refining.
Why use LPG?
LPG is cleaner than coal and oil
and an alternative to gasoline. It
generates less air pollution and
produces fewer emissions of
carbon dioxide. LPG is also highly
portable, making it a convenient
source of energy usable in remote
places where ordinary gas supplies
are unavailable or have been
interrupted.
AT HOME
ON THE GO
AT THE
FARM
AT WORK
OTHER

10. LPG in the petrochemical value chain
10
The LPG value chain
Source Processing industries
Transport /
usage
User
Natural gas well
Oil well
Gas plant Natural gas
LNG
liquefaction
Refinery
LPG
Ammonia
Condensates
(CPP)
Clean
products
Dirty
products
Petrochemical
gases
Pipeline
LNG ship
LPG Vessels
Power generation
Residential/
commercial
Industrial
Auto
Further refining
Chemicals
Agricultural

11. LPG Supply and Export Dynamics

12. Global Liftings showing steady growth
Global liftings (MM Tons)
12
Source: IHS, EIA, FGE *Note: Bbls/day converted to MT/yr (bbls per day/11.6 * 365)
U.S. Waterborne Exports Middle East Waterborne Exports
59.7 60.7 63.0
75.1
85.4
90.6 93.0
7.7 7.5
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Jan YTD 2018 Jan YTD
MetricTons(Millions)
Annual Volumes
34.2
32.1
34.8
36.7
39.2
37.2
2.9 2.8
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017
Jan YTD
2018
Jan YTD
MetricTons(Millions)
5.1
9.3
13.8
20.5
25.3
29.5
2.8 2.9
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017
Jan YTD
2018
Jan YTD
MetricTons(Millions)

13. 15% 19%
25% 29% 32%
51% 47%
45%
44% 40%
12% 11%
10%
10% 10%
8% 11% 10% 8% 8%
14% 12% 10% 8% 9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
US ME N.Sea Med Other
U.S. LPG has significantly increased its share of global supply
Source: EIA, Bloomberg, IHS, FGE
A New Era of Supply
13
• Emergence of U.S. as largest exporting nation has
forced price competition amongst all suppliers
• Middle East supply has surprised on the upside with
more export growth than expected
• The Asian market has become increasing reliant on
US LPG
Seaborne LPG by Source

14. Evolving U.S. NGL / LPG Trade Flows
14
Europe
18%
Caribbean
10%
China
12%
Africa
2%Other
0%
Mexico
10%
South
America
16%Australia
1%
Japan
13%
Korea
14%
Asia -
Other
4%
Europe
11%
Caribbean
9%
China
13%
Africa
2%
Other
1%
Mexico
9%
South
America
13%
Australia
1%
Japan
23%
Korea
13%
Asia -
Other
5%
2016 2017
U.S. LPG volumes to Asia
increased 45% year-over-
year (vs. 15% growth in
overall U.S. LPG exports).
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1/1/2016 4/1/2016 7/1/2016 10/1/2016 1/1/2017 4/1/2017 7/1/2017 10/1/2017
Butane (+15%)
Propane (+15%)
Ethane (+289%)
U.S. Exports of NGLs (mb/d) – 2016 vs. 2017
+25% y-o-y
Source: EvercoreISI

15. U.S. as Global NGL / LPG Price Setter…
15
We believe the U.S. will become the global LPG market price setter given increasing supply at both
Mont Belvieu and the Northeast (Marcus Hook) coupled with a liquid trading market and active hedging
opportunities along the forward curves.
Increasing price
circularity as greater
volumes of U.S. LPG
clear in the
international market.
Argus CIF ARA
OPIS Mont Belvieu
Sonatrach CP
Saudi CP Argus FEI
Source: EvercoreISI

16. LPG Expansion Capacity
16
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
LPG Exports to Clear Market Existing Capacity
Mariner East 2 AltaGas Ridley Island
Pembina Prince Rupert
• We estimate current LPG export
capacity is running at ~91%
utilization (LPG nameplate
capacity est. at ~1,200 mb/d).
• Based on the ‘Base Case’ model,
increasing volumes of LPG
(propane and butane) will need to
be exported in order to clear the
market. The total volume is
expected to grow from ~1,000
mb/d in 2017 to ~1,300 mb/d in
2020 and ~1,500 mb/d in 2022.
The need to clear via exports
stems from the lack of
incremental domestic demand in
the face of increasing levels of
production.
• The Mariner East II start-up (est.
2018) will provide an outlet for
(initially) up to ~275 mb/d. We
expect this will provide some near
term relief to the Gulf Coast
terminals, although we expect
that Mariner East II will take some
time to fill up. Mariner East II is
expected to primarily export NGLs
produced in the Appalachian
region.
Base Case LPG Exports (mb/d)
Export capacity tightens. New capacity needed.
Source: EvercoreISI

17. LPG Demand & Consumption

18. Growing markets for LPG: CHINA
• will be used as
primary fuel source
Annual China LPG imports (Tons)
18Source: FGE
4.2M
6.9M
11.9M
15.9M
18.3M
0M
2M
4M
6M
8M
10M
12M
14M
16M
18M
20M
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Millions

19. Chinese Consumers Continue to Drive LPG Demand
19Source: FGE, Platts
• While the restart of coal-fired plants to ease winter power shortages has probably dented Chinese residential heating
demand for LPG in the near term, demand from the petrochemical sector is set to rebound with new PDH and alkylation
unit start-ups due in 2018
• Residential LPG will still be required in more remote rural areas, where piped gas is unavailable or too costly to install,
but overall, chemicals will account for a growing share of China’s LPG demand, especially with a rapidly growing
petrochemical base in China.
• While no new PDH plants started up in China last year, both the 0.66 Mtpy Fujian Meide plant and Zhejiang Satellite’s
0.45 Mtpy expansion are expected to start up in H2 18
• State-owned refiners are also starting up an estimated 3.7 Mtpy of alkylation units, which will reduce refinery supplies of
butane currently sold to standalone deep-processing units, increasing the need for imported supplies. So, Chinese buyers
will remain a key source of demand throughout 2018
• Middle Eastern supply alone will not be able to meet demand
China LPG imports by source
China LPG demand outlook
6.8% 8.4% 15.5% 18.8%10.4%
20.5%
17.0%
23.4%
42.8% 19.6% 18.4%
11.9%
11.3%
10.1%
14.5% 16.4%
6.5%
8.1%
10.3% 6.9%
22.2%
33.3%
24.3% 22.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
2014 2015 2016 2017
Qatar United States Iran United Arab Emirates Saudi Arabia Others

20. “The year of the LPG consumer”: INDIA
• Power conversion
project with Vitol
• By April, LPG will be
used as primary fuel
source
India LPG import forecast (Million MT)
• Indian LPG demand remained near record levels in December 2017, with consumption rising by 45 thousand b/d y/y in Q4
17.
• The Modi Government aggressively promoting LPG penetration in rural areas calling 2016 “the year of the LPG Consumer”
• The Indian government’s subsidized LPG connection scheme has issued 30.3 million connections since its inception in
March 2016 and the country now has at least 181 million subsidized connections
• Original target of new connections under latest scheme was increased from 50 million to 80 million by May 2019,
suggesting there is plenty of upside for Indian LPG
• Non subsidized market growing due to lower international LPG prices
• Demand from autogas and the private sector are set to grow amidst favourable auto-fuel economics and a 13% decline in
GST tax for private companies
• Paradip refinery startup marks last major domestic supply addition supporting further imports
• Seaborne LPG imports into India were up 17.1% in 2017, from 10.1mm tons to 11.9mm tons
20Source: IOC, FGE, Energy Aspects
6M
8.1M
8.9M
10.1M
11.9M
M
2M
4M
6M
8M
10M
12M
14M
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

21. Global PDH & Petchems also fueling demand
21
Illustrative increase from Korean PDH Plant
• Korean market is saturated but saw a major increase in
demand in 2017 from a new PDH facility
• PDH importers require high purity propane, best sourced from
the US or Middle East
• This year could be sustained by the ramp-up of SK Advanced’s
PDH plant, stronger heating demand due to frigid temperatures
(one of the coldest Januarys on record for Korea) and a growing
preference for LPG cracking among petrochemical plants
Japan Upgrades cracker capacity
• Japan’s Idemitsu Kosan’s JV with Mitsui Chemicals
recently announced plans to expand the processing of
propane at Idemitsu’s naphtha cracker
• The upgrade will boost the Cracker’s capacity to process
propane as feedstock by three or four times.
• It will mainly rely on LPG imports for feedstock rather
than a small quantity of LPG produced at the plant
• According to data from Japan LP Gas Association, LPG
requirements were driven by residential heating demand
for propane.
• The cold weather combined with petro-chem demand for
Butane picking up on opportunistic switching due to high
Naphtha prices demand growth could see further increase
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Korean LPG Demand by Sector (mmtons)
Petrochemical Feedstocks Residential
Road Commercial and Public Services
Others
Source: FGE
Europe
• European petchem giant INEOS announced this June plans
to expand its petrochemical infrastructure in Northwest
Europe, with large capacity increases in its Rafnes,
Norway and Grangemouth, Scotland crackers, as well as a
greenfield 750,000 tons/year PDH unit in an undisclosed
location.

22. 22
✓ Established production hubs
✓ Global supply base
✓ Maritime and land transport options
✓ Price competitive product
✓ Low cost “last mile” infrastructure
✓ Lower greenhouse gas emissions
✓ 20% less CO2 than heating oil
✓ 50% less CO2 than coal
✓ Safe fuel source
✓ Avoids harmful and dangerous waste
LPG should be the fuel of
choice for emerging economies
Source: ExceptionalEnergy.com
Key Factors Favoring LPG Adoption for Power Generation and Retail Consumption
Strong Fundamentals for Continued LPG Adoption
Each year, around 3.5 million premature
deaths can be attributed to household air
pollution resulting from the traditional use of
solid fuels, such as fuelwood and charcoal.
Four out of five people in sub-Saharan Africa
rely on the traditional use of solid biomass,
mainly fuelwood, for cooking.
Nearly 3.1 billion people, or 43% of the global
population, still rely on polluting fuels (i.e.
biomass, coal, kerosene) and technologies for
cooking - a major source of household air
pollution.
Source: World Health Organization
Economic
Environmental

23. VLGC Shipping Market Dynamics

24. Continued High VLGC Utilization
Drivers underlying current rate environment
24
Source: Clarksons Research, Baltic Exchange, Panama Canal Authority
Baltic VLGC daily spot TCE rates (USD/d) Global VLGC fleet utilization
86%
85%
2016
2017
• Incremental VLGC fleet growth has been absorbed without severely impacting utilization thus far (i.e. demand for
seaborne transport continues to grow in excess of fleet growth)
• The Panama Canal Authority increased rates for neo-Panamax VLGCs by 29% in October of 2017. This equates to an
increase of ~$2.2/t. Currently, we estimate that 28% of traffic through the expanded canal is VLGCs, second only to
container ships at 54%. The increased fees, alongside increased competition from other sectors like LNG, could
result in a reduction in VLGC transits which would increase ton mile demand as those ships would then likely transit
around the Cape of Good Hope, adding an additional 20-25 days transit time.
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
May-16
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
Sep-16
Oct-16
Nov-16
Dec-16
Jan-17
Feb-17
Mar-17
Apr-17
May-17
Jun-17
Jul-17
Aug-17
Sep-17
Oct-17
Nov-17
Dec-17
Jan-18
Feb-18
Baltic TCE / Day Baltic TCE / Day (4 Week Trailing Avg.)

25. VLGC Fleet & Orderbook Review
VLGC orderbook (2013-Onwards) (# vessels)
25Source: Clarksons Research, Dorian LPG analysis
Fleet profile1 (# vessels)
3 2 17
Modern With Scrubber Scrubber Ready
BWTS + IMO low sulphur regulations
• BWTS Convention
• Approx. 65-71 VLGCs will be required to
DD and subsequently install BWTS
between 9/8/2017-1/1/2019
• 2020 Low Sulphur regulations
• Suggest 25% increase in bunker cost
Dorian LPG’s VLGC Fleet is ready:
Potential Scrapping Candidates
(1) As of March 25, 2018
152
53
35
20
10
26
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
<5 5 to 10 10 to 15 15 to 20 20 to 25 > 25
13
8
35
44
21
5
4
18
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
In Service On Order

26. Financials

27. Recent Financing Developments: Continuing to Enhance Balance Sheet
Flexibility
27
• On May 31, 2017, the Company announced an agreement with its lenders under its $758 million facility to relax certain
covenants of the 2015 Debt Facility and have also agreed to release $26.8 million of restricted cash to be applied
towards future debt repayments, interest and certain fees.
• On June 7, 2017, the Company announced that it repaid its RBS debt facility at 96% of the then outstanding principal
amount with a new $97 million bridge loan facility from DNB. As part of the refinancing, $6 million of cash previously
restricted was released and used as unrestricted cash.
• On August 25, 2017, the Company announced that it had filed to issue up to $40 million of equity pursuant to an “at the
market” (“ATM”) offering.
• On November 7, 2017, the Company refinanced a 2014-built VLGC, the Corsair, pursuant to a memorandum of
agreement and a bareboat charter agreement that valued the vessel at $65 million. We bareboat chartered the vessel
back for a period of 12 years, with a mandatory buyout in 2029 and purchase options from the 2nd anniversary of the
transaction onwards. The underlying interest rate is 4.9% and the underlying amortization profile is 16 years. The cash
refinancing proceeds of $52.0 million were used to repay $30.1 million of the 2017 Bridge Loan’s then outstanding
principal amount.
• On January 31, 2018, the Company refinanced a 2015-built VLGC, the Concorde, pursuant to a memorandum of
agreement and a bareboat charter agreement that valued the vessel at $70 million. We bareboat chartered the vessel
back for a period of 13 years, with a mandatory buyout in 2031 and purchase options from the end of the 3rd anniversary
of the transaction onwards. The underlying interest rate is 4.9% and the underlying amortization profile is 17.3 years.
The cash refinancing proceeds of $56.0 million were used to repay $35.1 million of the 2015 Debt Facility’s then
outstanding principal amount.

28. Statement of Operations Data (USD)
Statement of Operations Data
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
Revenues $ 44,545,589 $ 35,734,988
Voyage expenses (386,637) (1,193,265)
Vessel operating expenses (15,749,381) (17,114,358)
General and administrative expenses (5,536,028) (5,166,239)
Other income—related parties 633,883 670,836
EBITDA 23,462,426 12,931,962
Depreciation and amortization (16,466,322) (16,385,921)
Operating income/(loss) 6,996,104 (3,453,959)
Other income/(expenses), net (5,325,689) 8,493,583
Net income $ 1,670,415 $ 5,039,624
Other Financial Data
Time charter equivalent rate (1) $ 22,833 $ 17,796
Daily vessel operating expenses (2) $ 7,804 $ 8,456
Adjusted EBITDA (3) $ 24,696,206 $ 13,927,649
(1) Our method of calculating time charter equivalent rate is to divide revenue net of voyage expenses by operating days for the relevant time period.
(2) Calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by calendar days for the relevant time period.
(3) Represents net income excluding the potentially disparate effects between periods of derivatives, interest and finance costs, stock-based
compensation expense, impairment, and depreciation and amortization expense and is used as a supplemental financial measure by
management to assess our financial and operating performance.
28

29. Statement of Operations Data (USD)
Statement of Operations Data
Nine Months Ended
December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
Revenues $ 120,300,082 $ 119,861,997
Voyage expenses (1,901,603) (2,415,287)
Vessel operating expenses (48,420,108) (49,549,255)
General and administrative expenses (19,492,082) (15,981,464)
Other income—related parties 1,905,836 1,776,659
EBITDA 52,392,125 53,692,650
Depreciation and amortization (49,224,187) (48,944,183)
Operating income 3,167,938 4,748,467
Other income/(expenses), net (20,102,629) (8,145,552)
Net loss $ (16,934,691) $ (3,397,085)
Other Financial Data
Time charter equivalent rate (1) $ 21,199 $ 21,131
Daily vessel operating expenses (2) $ 8,003 $ 8,190
Adjusted EBITDA (3) $ 56,278,367 $ 56,757,693
(1) Our method of calculating time charter equivalent rate is to divide revenue net of voyage expenses by operating days for the relevant time period.
(2) Calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by calendar days for the relevant time period.
(3) Represents net income excluding the potentially disparate effects between periods of derivatives, interest and finance costs, stock-based
compensation expense, impairment, and depreciation and amortization expense and is used as a supplemental financial measure by
management to assess our financial and operating performance.
29

30. Statement of Operations Data (USD)
Statement of Operations Data
Year Ended
Mar 31, 2017
(Audited)
Year Ended
Mar 31, 2016
(Audited)
Revenues $ 167,447,171 $ 289,207,829
Voyage expenses (2,965,978) (12,064,682)
Vessel operating expenses (66,108,062) (47,119,990)
General and administrative expenses (21,732,864) (29,836,029)
Loss on disposal of assets — (1,125,395)
Other income—related parties 2,410,542 1,945,396
EBITDA 79,050,809 201,007,129
Depreciation and amortization (65,057,487) (42,591,942)
Operating income 13,993,322 158,415,187
Other income/(expenses), net (15,435,137) (28,726,805)
Net income/(loss) $ (1,441,815) $ 129,688,382
Other Financial Data
Time charter equivalent rate (1) $ 22,037 $ 55,087
Daily vessel operating expenses (2) $ 8,233 $ 8,581
Adjusted EBITDA (3) $ 83,279,670 $ 204,865,215
(1) Our method of calculating time charter equivalent rate is to divide revenue net of voyage expenses by operating days for the relevant time period.
(2) Calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by calendar days for the relevant time period.
(3) Represents net income excluding the potentially disparate effects between periods of derivatives, interest and finance costs, stock-based
compensation expense, impairment, and depreciation and amortization expense and is used as a supplemental financial measure by
management to assess our financial and operating performance.
30

31. Cash Flows Data (USD)
Cash Flows Data
Nine Months Ended
December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
Net loss $ (16,934,691) $ (3,397,085)
Adjustments 51,551,945 29,066,675
Changes in operating assets and liabilities 6,328,996 23,535,260
Net cash provided by operating activities 40,946,250 49,204,850
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities 21,488,349 (1,762,861)
Net cash used in financing activities (23,901,827) (61,699,686)
Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 81,967 (314,626)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ 38,614,739 $ (14,572,323)
Cash Flows Data
Year Ended
March 31, 2017
(Audited)
Year Ended
March 31, 2016
(Audited)
Net income/(loss) $ (1,441,815) $ 129,688,382
Adjustments 46,189,541 59,421,412
Changes in operating assets and liabilities 7,356,042 (38,082,294)
Net cash operating activities 52,103,768 151,027,500
Net cash used in investing activities (1,981,022) (910,414,841)
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities (79,318,882) 601,090,409
Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (197,274) (112,289)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents $ (29,393,410) $ (158,409,221)
31

32. Balance Sheet Data (USD)
Balance Sheet Data
December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
Cash and cash equivalents $ 55,633,291 $ 31,839,639
Restricted cash, non-current 29,082,958 50,812,789
Total assets 1,706,199,091 1,760,213,403
Current portion of long-term debt 126,557,191 65,978,786
Long-term debt – net of current portion and deferred financing fees 600,905,936 700,715,644
Total liabilities 744,239,747 787,313,926
Total shareholders' equity $ 961,959,344 $ 972,899,477
Balance Sheet Data
March 31, 2017
(Audited)
March 31, 2016
(Audited)
Cash and cash equivalents $ 17,018,552 $ 46,411,962
Restricted cash, non-current 50,874,146 50,812,789
Total assets 1,746,234,880 1,842,178,176
Current portion of long-term debt 65,978,785 66,265,643
Long-term debt – net of current portion and deferred financing fees 683,985,463 746,354,613
Total liabilities 770,233,162 856,578,939
Total shareholders' equity $ 976,001,718 $ 985,599,237
32

33. Our Mission is to arrange safe, reliable and trouble free transportation