MGT521 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 09 Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Content, Research, and Analysis 21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points Content Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the change agent; with no errors or major omissions. Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the change agent; may include some minor errors or omissions. Demonstrates fair knowledge of the change agent; and/or includes some major errors or omissions. Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the change agent; and/or includes many major errors or omissions. 29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points Analysis Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points Sources Sources meet required criteria and include three or more scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Sources meet required criteria and include two scholarly, peer- reviewed journal articles chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Source meets required criteria and includes one scholarly, peer- reviewed journal article chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. No sources are included. Mechanics and Writing 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure, contains Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph Project is poorly organized and written and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, MGT521 Critic ...

1. MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 09
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Requirements Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes few of the

2. required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Content Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
change agent; with
no errors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
change agent; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
change agent;
and/or includes
some major errors
or omissions.
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
change agent;
and/or includes
many major errors

3. or omissions.
29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points
Analysis Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Sources meet
required criteria
and include three
or more scholarly,
peer-reviewed
journal articles

4. chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Sources meet
required criteria
and include two
scholarly, peer-
reviewed journal
articles chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Source meets
required criteria
and includes one
scholarly, peer-
reviewed journal
article chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.

5. No sources are
included.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure, contains
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
Project is poorly

6. organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 09
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
structure, may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA

7. citations and
references.
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
and references.
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.
Total points possible = 110
Grading Rubric for Leadership Interview Questions
Question Category
2 pts.
1pts
0 pts
Management of Teams
Developed open ended question that will promote conversation
and is relevant to topic
Developed question that is either closed ended, and/or has little
relevance to topic.
No question developed
Interprofessional Collaboration

8. Developed open ended question that will promote conversation
and is relevant to topic
Developed question that is either closed ended, and/or has little
relevance to topic.
No question developed
Motivating and empowering followers
Developed open ended question that will promote conversation
and is relevant to topic
Developed question that is either closed ended, and/or has little
relevance to topic.
No question developed
Management of nursing issues within the health care system
Developed open ended question that will promote conversation
and is relevant to topic
Developed question that is either closed ended, and/or has little
relevance to topic.
No question developed
Delegation and supervision
Developed open ended question that will promote conversation
and is relevant to topic
Developed question that is either closed ended, and/or has little
relevance to topic.
No question developed
Evidence-based nursing practice
Developed open ended question that will promote conversation
and is relevant to topic
Developed question that is either closed ended, and/or has little
relevance to topic.
No question developed
Professional development within the professional baccalaureate -
nursing role.
Developed open ended question that will promote conversation
and is relevant to topic
Developed question that is either closed ended, and/or has little
relevance to topic.
No question developed

9. Leadership self-care
NA
Developed question that relates to leadership self-care
No question developed
Total Points/15
Leadership Exploration Component 2: Interview Questions
Management of Teams (2 points)
Interprofessional Collaboration (2 points)
Motivating and Empowering Followers (2 points)
Management of nursing issues within the health care system (2
points)
Delegation and supervision (2 points)

10. Evidence-based nursing practice (2 points)
Professional development within the professional baccalaureate
nursing role (2 points)
Leadership self-care (1 point).
1
Leadership and Systems Change
Leadership Exploration Project Component 2
Leader Interview Questions
Topic Mentoring and Growing Future Leaders
Assignment Summary: Component 2 includes composing
interview questions for a person currently holding a health care
nursing leadership position.The development of interview
questions is an important part of this exercise. You may choose
to interview a leader from your workplace, or one that is
familiar to you on a professional basis.
Purpose of the Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to

11. develop interview questions that encourage conversation and are
associated with key attributes of leadership.
Assignment Requirements: As you devise your interview
questions, areas for emphasis are:
· Management of teams – 2 points
· Interprofessional collaboration – 2 points
· Motivating and empowering followers – 2 points
· Management of nursing issues within the health care system –
2 points
· Delegation and supervision – 2 points
· Evidence–based nursing practice – 2 points
· Professional development within the professional
baccalaureate-nursing role – 2 points
· Leadership self-care – 1 point
Deliverables/Guidelines for Writing: Use the Interview question
template embedded in D2L
Grading: Upload the Leader Interview Questions to the dropbox
by the date indicated on the course schedule. The Leadership
Interview Questions rubric will be used for grading.
Leadership Interview Questions Revised 09/21 SOR