SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 38
2AC3 Advanced
CAD
Project #1
Motor Dimos
Group Members: Dimos Siagoulis, Yaochen He, Nathan Smith and Vinicius
Reis
Instructor: Dr. Lucian Balan
Our Goal
“To apply skills learned in the
classroom and develop new
ones while working with the
overall objective of
reproducing a life sized pocket
bike”
Vinicius
Team Results
Fitting Representation
Chris
Team Results
Kinematics Representation
Nathan
Dimos’ Major Part
Dimos
Dimos
Dimos’ Summary
• Total Hours: 60+
• Total parts created: 15 created and over 10 edited
• Self- Learning: Wire Frame, Boolean Operation and Sheet metal design
• Difficulty: The most difficult part was the frame, I had issues with filleting
the corners of the ribs, in some cases I had to change the rib sketch to have
rounded corners, in others this technique didn’t work.
• Another difficulty was editing other’s parts, because each person has their
own style I had to figure out what they did and fix it, which sometimes took
longer than starting from scratch
• When making the final assembly we ran into many issues with parts not
fitting into each other, or intersecting other parts. I spent over 20 hours
editing parts to get them to fit to be assembled
• What I liked: Once I overcame the initial difficulty, CATIA easily became
my favourite 3D modelling software. It’s really powerful and very
rewarding when your project is finally finished.
Dimos
Dimos’ Parts Dimos
Frame: 14 hours
Learned: Wire Frame and sheet metal design
Difficulty: Had trouble with mirroring the frame, I had to actually
construct both sides of the frame manually. Also had trouble with
fillets on the curves. My most problematic and difficult part.
Dimos
Piston: 4 hours
Learned: Boolean operations to create oval fillet
Dimos
Needle Bearing 4 hours (2 per bearing)
Dimos and Nathan
Engine Block: 8 hours
(4 hours each)
Learned: Utilized Boolean addition and subtraction.
Also used remove face and draft angle
Dimos’Assemblies
Dimos
Full Engine Assembly: 2 hours (once all
parts finally fit)
Screws & Gasket
Engine Internals
Sparkplug
Exhaust
Air Intake assembly
(made by Vinicius)
Dimos
Engine Assembly:
45 min (once all parts
finally fit)
Clutch
Assembly
Piston Rod
Crankshaft
Impeller
Final Stationary Assembly
I imported Vinicius’ tire assemblies, Chris’
Front forks assembly, Nathan’s chain assembly
And my engine assembly and constrained them
To the frame.
Over 10 hours of work on the assembly including
Editing pieces so they fit into each other
Dimos
Chris’ Summary
• Total Hours: 40 hours
• Total parts created: 10 parts created, fitting and videos
• Self- Learning:
o Working with caliper
o Creating disassembly using workbench DMU Fitting
o Using Jing to record
• Difficulty:
o Get all possible dimensions
o Be creative on hidden dimensions
Chris
Chris’ Parts
Chris
Impeller: 4 Hours
Learned: Be creative on hidden dimensions
Chris
Name: 10 Hours
Learned: Using caliper, inner/ outer diameter, depth
Chris’AssemblyFront Forks: hours
Break, with help from
Dimos, applying
teamwork skills into the
parts
Front
fork
Handle bar
What I think I build
Chris
What I actually build
Chris
Things I learned: Fitting
Chris
Learning from YouTube
Channel, Practising in
workbench DMU Fitting
while group members
were working on
assembly
Vinicius’ Summary
• Total Hours: about 50 hours
• Total parts created: around 30 parts created and 4 assemblies
• Self- Learning:
o Generative shape design (Threads),
o Drafting workbench (3-D text)
o Developing planes with various commands
• Difficulty:
o Designing and being able to extrude on an angle
• Solution: planes at an angle from surface
o Making groves on non-flat services
• Solution: spline and sketch
o Complex Parts
• Solution: taking it layer by layer to make part
Vinicius’ Parts
Vinicius
Front Rim: 3 hours and Valve Cap: 2 hours
Learned: Creating threads using helix application on Generative Shape Design
Vinicius
Tire: 15 hours
Learned: Making 3-D text using Drafting
Vinicius’ Challenges &
Solutions
Making planes
on an angle to
add an angle
extrude to the
part
Adapting a way to add groves to a curved surface: spline and a sketch to
follow spline shown above
Vinicius
Complex part that has
parts put together
that are awkward and
not easily designed
done by layers as a
solution
Vinicius’Assemblies
Vinicius
Ball Bearing Assembly: 10 minutes for each (4 different ones made)
Outer Ring
Inner Ring
Retainer
Balls
Wheel Assembly: 2 hours
Tire
Brake
Disk
Front Rim
Front Shaft
Steering Ball Bearing
Bushing
Valve Cap and Valve Steam
Intake Assembly: 3 hours
Gasket
Intake
Manifold
Intake Cap
Engine Bridge Handle
Intake air
fuel mix
Flap
Nathan’s Summary
• Total Hours: approximately 70 hours
• Total parts created: 23 parts created and 5 assemblies
• Self- Learning:
o Generative shape design (chain paths)
o Chain kinematics
o Rendering of parts with material selection
• Challenges:
o Chain alignment and distancing
• Physical chain was loose
• Distance had to be calculated
o Large number of kinematic elements
• 410 kinematic joints
• Several hundred constraints
• Nearly 500 parts in assembly
Nathan’s Parts
Nathan
Clutch transfer housing: 5.2 hours
Nathan
Sprockets: 3 hours
Modelled tooth profile
to pitch of chain
The beginnings of the chain assembly
Nathan’s Challenges
Nathan
Clutch snap-rings: 1 hour
Specific challenge:
- determining measurements without ability
to remove parts from larger assembly
Nathan’s Assemblies
Nathan
Chain assembly/ kinematics: 50+ hours
All parts + assembly = approx. 1 hour
Challenge of the chain:
- could not be disassembled
- loose on actual bike
Time taken: approx. 30 hours
Kinematics time taken: approx. 20 hours
Nathan
Clutch Assembly: 1.5 hours
Challenge of the clutch:
- held together by springs
- Could not be disassembled
- Tight space for measurements
- Irregular shapes that did not repeat
Group
Fully completed assembly
Nathan
Organization
Method for
ownership,
naming, and
completion
Addition Group
Achievements
• Managing Files (using Dropbox)
• Following set name style
• Modifying parts to fit each others
• Understanding each others strengths and weakness
Group
Questions ?

More Related Content

Similar to Motor_Dimos_Presentation - actual

Handcar project report
Handcar project reportHandcar project report
Handcar project reportMoutaz Yahya
 
UI Solidworks Presentation.pptx
UI Solidworks Presentation.pptxUI Solidworks Presentation.pptx
UI Solidworks Presentation.pptxSHILPIYADAV37
 
INTERN REPORT PPT.pptx
INTERN REPORT PPT.pptxINTERN REPORT PPT.pptx
INTERN REPORT PPT.pptxAbsThHros
 
ALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks Portfolio
ALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks PortfolioALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks Portfolio
ALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks PortfolioAlex Brandt
 
Career Portfolio
Career PortfolioCareer Portfolio
Career PortfolioDavid Guan
 
Processes of automobile manufacturing
Processes of automobile manufacturingProcesses of automobile manufacturing
Processes of automobile manufacturingsatha vm
 
3D Printing Project Fall 2014
3D Printing Project Fall 20143D Printing Project Fall 2014
3D Printing Project Fall 2014Mitchell Gibbons
 
Senior project 2012 Presentation
Senior project 2012 PresentationSenior project 2012 Presentation
Senior project 2012 PresentationDaniel Barcus
 
Moving Mass Glider Presentation
Moving Mass Glider PresentationMoving Mass Glider Presentation
Moving Mass Glider PresentationSilvestre Pineda
 

Similar to Motor_Dimos_Presentation - actual (19)

VEX_PPT
VEX_PPTVEX_PPT
VEX_PPT
 
Vex 2
Vex 2Vex 2
Vex 2
 
Handcar project report
Handcar project reportHandcar project report
Handcar project report
 
UI Solidworks Presentation.pptx
UI Solidworks Presentation.pptxUI Solidworks Presentation.pptx
UI Solidworks Presentation.pptx
 
Matthew portfolio
Matthew portfolioMatthew portfolio
Matthew portfolio
 
Matthew's Portfolio
Matthew's PortfolioMatthew's Portfolio
Matthew's Portfolio
 
INTERN REPORT PPT.pptx
INTERN REPORT PPT.pptxINTERN REPORT PPT.pptx
INTERN REPORT PPT.pptx
 
ALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks Portfolio
ALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks PortfolioALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks Portfolio
ALEXANDER BRANDT - Solidoworks Portfolio
 
Career Portfolio
Career PortfolioCareer Portfolio
Career Portfolio
 
Senior Design Poster
Senior Design PosterSenior Design Poster
Senior Design Poster
 
Processes of automobile manufacturing
Processes of automobile manufacturingProcesses of automobile manufacturing
Processes of automobile manufacturing
 
3D Printing Project Fall 2014
3D Printing Project Fall 20143D Printing Project Fall 2014
3D Printing Project Fall 2014
 
Senior project 2012 Presentation
Senior project 2012 PresentationSenior project 2012 Presentation
Senior project 2012 Presentation
 
Project List
Project ListProject List
Project List
 
Moving Mass Glider Presentation
Moving Mass Glider PresentationMoving Mass Glider Presentation
Moving Mass Glider Presentation
 
Portfolio vinay
Portfolio vinayPortfolio vinay
Portfolio vinay
 
Final portfolio
Final portfolioFinal portfolio
Final portfolio
 
The Journey to a West Coast Drivetrain - Swatposium 2015
The Journey to a West Coast Drivetrain - Swatposium 2015The Journey to a West Coast Drivetrain - Swatposium 2015
The Journey to a West Coast Drivetrain - Swatposium 2015
 
Portfolio-PDF
Portfolio-PDFPortfolio-PDF
Portfolio-PDF
 

Motor_Dimos_Presentation - actual

  • 1. 2AC3 Advanced CAD Project #1 Motor Dimos Group Members: Dimos Siagoulis, Yaochen He, Nathan Smith and Vinicius Reis Instructor: Dr. Lucian Balan
  • 2. Our Goal “To apply skills learned in the classroom and develop new ones while working with the overall objective of reproducing a life sized pocket bike” Vinicius
  • 7. Dimos’ Summary • Total Hours: 60+ • Total parts created: 15 created and over 10 edited • Self- Learning: Wire Frame, Boolean Operation and Sheet metal design • Difficulty: The most difficult part was the frame, I had issues with filleting the corners of the ribs, in some cases I had to change the rib sketch to have rounded corners, in others this technique didn’t work. • Another difficulty was editing other’s parts, because each person has their own style I had to figure out what they did and fix it, which sometimes took longer than starting from scratch • When making the final assembly we ran into many issues with parts not fitting into each other, or intersecting other parts. I spent over 20 hours editing parts to get them to fit to be assembled • What I liked: Once I overcame the initial difficulty, CATIA easily became my favourite 3D modelling software. It’s really powerful and very rewarding when your project is finally finished. Dimos
  • 8. Dimos’ Parts Dimos Frame: 14 hours Learned: Wire Frame and sheet metal design Difficulty: Had trouble with mirroring the frame, I had to actually construct both sides of the frame manually. Also had trouble with fillets on the curves. My most problematic and difficult part.
  • 9. Dimos Piston: 4 hours Learned: Boolean operations to create oval fillet
  • 10. Dimos Needle Bearing 4 hours (2 per bearing)
  • 11. Dimos and Nathan Engine Block: 8 hours (4 hours each) Learned: Utilized Boolean addition and subtraction. Also used remove face and draft angle
  • 12. Dimos’Assemblies Dimos Full Engine Assembly: 2 hours (once all parts finally fit) Screws & Gasket Engine Internals Sparkplug Exhaust Air Intake assembly (made by Vinicius)
  • 13. Dimos Engine Assembly: 45 min (once all parts finally fit) Clutch Assembly Piston Rod Crankshaft Impeller
  • 14. Final Stationary Assembly I imported Vinicius’ tire assemblies, Chris’ Front forks assembly, Nathan’s chain assembly And my engine assembly and constrained them To the frame. Over 10 hours of work on the assembly including Editing pieces so they fit into each other Dimos
  • 15. Chris’ Summary • Total Hours: 40 hours • Total parts created: 10 parts created, fitting and videos • Self- Learning: o Working with caliper o Creating disassembly using workbench DMU Fitting o Using Jing to record • Difficulty: o Get all possible dimensions o Be creative on hidden dimensions Chris
  • 16. Chris’ Parts Chris Impeller: 4 Hours Learned: Be creative on hidden dimensions
  • 17. Chris Name: 10 Hours Learned: Using caliper, inner/ outer diameter, depth
  • 18. Chris’AssemblyFront Forks: hours Break, with help from Dimos, applying teamwork skills into the parts Front fork Handle bar
  • 19. What I think I build Chris
  • 20. What I actually build Chris
  • 21. Things I learned: Fitting Chris Learning from YouTube Channel, Practising in workbench DMU Fitting while group members were working on assembly
  • 22. Vinicius’ Summary • Total Hours: about 50 hours • Total parts created: around 30 parts created and 4 assemblies • Self- Learning: o Generative shape design (Threads), o Drafting workbench (3-D text) o Developing planes with various commands • Difficulty: o Designing and being able to extrude on an angle • Solution: planes at an angle from surface o Making groves on non-flat services • Solution: spline and sketch o Complex Parts • Solution: taking it layer by layer to make part
  • 23. Vinicius’ Parts Vinicius Front Rim: 3 hours and Valve Cap: 2 hours Learned: Creating threads using helix application on Generative Shape Design
  • 24. Vinicius Tire: 15 hours Learned: Making 3-D text using Drafting
  • 25. Vinicius’ Challenges & Solutions Making planes on an angle to add an angle extrude to the part Adapting a way to add groves to a curved surface: spline and a sketch to follow spline shown above Vinicius Complex part that has parts put together that are awkward and not easily designed done by layers as a solution
  • 26. Vinicius’Assemblies Vinicius Ball Bearing Assembly: 10 minutes for each (4 different ones made) Outer Ring Inner Ring Retainer Balls
  • 27. Wheel Assembly: 2 hours Tire Brake Disk Front Rim Front Shaft Steering Ball Bearing Bushing Valve Cap and Valve Steam
  • 28. Intake Assembly: 3 hours Gasket Intake Manifold Intake Cap Engine Bridge Handle Intake air fuel mix Flap
  • 29. Nathan’s Summary • Total Hours: approximately 70 hours • Total parts created: 23 parts created and 5 assemblies • Self- Learning: o Generative shape design (chain paths) o Chain kinematics o Rendering of parts with material selection • Challenges: o Chain alignment and distancing • Physical chain was loose • Distance had to be calculated o Large number of kinematic elements • 410 kinematic joints • Several hundred constraints • Nearly 500 parts in assembly
  • 31. Nathan Sprockets: 3 hours Modelled tooth profile to pitch of chain The beginnings of the chain assembly
  • 32. Nathan’s Challenges Nathan Clutch snap-rings: 1 hour Specific challenge: - determining measurements without ability to remove parts from larger assembly
  • 33. Nathan’s Assemblies Nathan Chain assembly/ kinematics: 50+ hours All parts + assembly = approx. 1 hour Challenge of the chain: - could not be disassembled - loose on actual bike Time taken: approx. 30 hours Kinematics time taken: approx. 20 hours
  • 34. Nathan Clutch Assembly: 1.5 hours Challenge of the clutch: - held together by springs - Could not be disassembled - Tight space for measurements - Irregular shapes that did not repeat
  • 37. Addition Group Achievements • Managing Files (using Dropbox) • Following set name style • Modifying parts to fit each others • Understanding each others strengths and weakness Group