This document provides information about rhinitis (inflammation of the nose). It defines rhinitis and describes the main types including allergic, infectious, non-allergic non-infectious, and chronic rhinosinusitis. It discusses the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of allergic rhinitis in particular. Allergic rhinitis is mediated by IgE and causes nasal inflammation and hyperreactivity. Diagnosis involves assessing symptoms, examining the nose, and performing allergy tests. Management follows guidelines and includes environmental control, pharmacotherapy with oral or intranasal antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, nasal steroids, and decongestants.
2. • Rhinitis: Symptomatic disorder of the nose
characterized by itching, nasal discharge,
sneezing and nasal airway obstruction
• Allergic rhinitis: Induction of rhinitis
symptoms after allergen exposure by an
IgE-mediated immune reaction;
accompanied by inflammation of the nasal
mucosa and nasal airway hyperreactivity.
3. Rhinitis Phenotypes
most common forms
• Allergic
• Infectious: Viral (acute), bacterial, fungal
• Non-Allergic, Non-Infectious, Rhinitis
• Non-Allergic Rhinitis with Eosinophilia Syndrome (NARES)
• Chronic Rhinosinusitis with or without Polyps: Hypertrophic,
inflammatory disorder that can affect allergic or non-allergic individuals
4. Non-allergic rhinitis
• Has a multifactorial etiology.
• Is a risk factor for the development of asthma.
• If eosinophilic, usually responds to treatment
with corticosteroids.
• May be a presenting complaint for systemic
disorders such as Wegener’s granulomatosis,
Churg–Strauss and sarcoidoisis.
6. • Occupational: May be allergic or non-allergic
• Drug-induced: Aspirin, some vasodilators
• Hormonal: Pregnancy, menstruation, hormonal contraceptives,
thyroid disorders
• Food-induced (gustatory)
• Cold air-induced (skier’s nose)
• Atrophic (rhinitis of the elderly)
Rhinitis Phenotypes
less common forms
9. Cameron et al J Immunol 2003;171:3816
In situ hybridization for Iε mRNA - tissue obtained from subjects with alleric rhinitis
Iε RNA+ cells
(germline transcript)
Not exposed to
ragweed
Exposed to
ragweed
IgE can be produced in the nasal mucosa
10. Local Allergic Reaction
(nasal challenges with allergen in non-allergic rhinitics)
Carney et al. Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32:1436
Resistance
(most obstructed
nostril)
Individual data
Individual data
N=21
N=21
0
0
pre
pre-
-challenge
challenge
post
post-
-challenge
challenge
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
All these subjects had
no response to a control
challenge with diluent
11. Allergic Rhinitis: Impact
• High prevalence
• Impaired quality of life
• Work and school absence
• Impaired learning
• Impaired sleeping
• Associated asthma, sinusitis, otitis
12. Adapted from Meltzer EO et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99:S815
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Profiles of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis
*
*
*
*
*
*
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Physical
Functioning
Role–
Physical
Bodily
Pain
General
Health
Vitality Social
Functioning
Role–
Emotional
Mental
Health
Change in
Health
allergic rhinitis (n=312)
controls (n=139)
†
Declining
health
status
Domains
scale: 0 to 100
14. Berrettini et al., Allergy. 1999;54:242-8.
Presence of Sinus Disease Based on CT Findings in
Patients with Allergic Rhinitis and Controls
67.5%
33.4%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Number of subjects
Allergic rhinitis Controls
Total
With positive sinus CT
p=0.017
15. Allergic Rhinitis as a Risk Factor for Chronic Sinusitis
Ear Nose Throat-related flight disqualifying events that developed
over a 5-year period in Naval Flight Personnel with only allergic
rhinitis (N=465) versus controls (N=12,628)
Walker C. et al. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998; 69:952
Relative Risk 95% CI
Chonic Sinusitis 4.5 (1.7-11.6)
Alternobaric
Disease
1.6 (0.4-6.6)
Polyposis 1.2 (0.2-8.7)
Conductive Hearing
Loss
0.9 (0.1-6.6)
Requirement for
ENT Surgery
3.4 (0.4-27.1)
16. Allergic rhinitis: The basis of co-morbidity with otitis
media with effusion
Allergic inflammation
and edema obstruct
the eustachian tube
Allergic nasopharyngeal
obstruction and secretions
facilitate microbial middle ear
inflammation
Middle ear functions
as an allergic target
organ
Adapted from Sobotta, Atlas der Anatomie des Menschen. Bd. 1, 21; 2000.
17. ALLERGIC RHINITIS AND ITS IMPACT ON
ASTHMA
ARIA
JACI 2001:56: 813-824
Allergy 2008: 63 (Suppl. 86): 8–160
18. Perennial Rhinitis:
an Independent Risk Factor for Asthma
(European Community Respiratory Health Survey)
adapted from Leynaert B et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 104:301
asthma (%)
Atopic Non atopic
no rhinitis, N=5198
rhinitis, N=1412
OR=11
OR=17
0
5
10
15
20
25
19. In Patients with Rhinitis:
– Routinely query for symptoms suggestive of asthma
– Perform chest examination
– Consider lung function testing
– Consider tests for bronchial hyperresponsiveness in
selected cases
20. Intermittent
Symptoms
• < 4 days / week
• or < 4 weeks
Persistent
Symptoms
• > 4 days / week
• or > 4 weeks
Mild
• Sleep: normal
• Daily activities (incl. sports):
normal
• Work-school activities:
normal
• Severe symptoms: no
Moderate- severe
• Sleep: disturbed
• Daily activities: Restricted
• Work and school activities:
disrupted
• Severe symptoms: yes
Allergic Rhinitis Classification
22. Globally Important Sources of Allergens
• House dust mites
• Grass, tree and
weed pollen
• Pets
• Cockroaches
• Molds
23. Diagnosis of Allergic Rhinitis:
• Detailed personal and family allergic
history
• Intranasal examination – anterior
rhinoscopy
• Symptoms of other allergic diseases
• Allergy skin tests and/or
• In vitro specific IgE tests
27. Immunoassay
• Not influenced by
medication
• Not influenced by skin
disease
• Does not require
expertise
• Quality control possible
• Expensive
Skin test
• Higher sensitivity
• Immediate results
• Requires expertise
• Cheaper
Immunoassay vs Skin Test for Diagnosis of Allergy
29. Peak nasal inspiratory flow
• Determines nasal airway patency using a nasal inspiratory
flow meter.
•
• The results are reproducible and correlate with rhinoscopic
evidence of rhinitis but not with symptom scores
• Most useful for comparing changes in airway patency within
the same subject
Allergy 2005; 60:795–800
30. Acoustic rhinometry.
• Measures changes in mucosal congestion using reflected
sound.
• Sound in the nasal cavity is reflected by changes in acoustic
impedance caused by changes in cavity dimensions.
• The change in acoustic impedance between the incident wave
and reflected sound waves is proportional to the cross-
sectional area.
• The method requires standardization and considerable
experience to interpret and obtain reproducible results.
Rhinology 2000; 16 (Suppl.):3–17.
31. Rhinomanometry
• Estimation of nasal resistance from pressure–flow relationships.
• Considered as an accurate measure of nasal airway patency.
• Anterior RM: Pressure sensor is placed at the tip of each nostril and
resistance is
• measured in each nostril separately.
• Posterior RM: Pressure sensor is placed in the back of the nasal
cavity and total nasal airway resistance is determined.
• Expensive equipment
• Requires considerable experience in interpretation
32. Endothelial
cell activation
Leukocyte
infiltration and activation
(lymphocytes, eosinophils,
basophils)
IMMEDIATE (early)
RESPONSE
LATE-PHASE
RESPONSES
preformed &
newly formed
mediators/cytokines
mast cell
Sneezing
Pruritus
Rhinorrhea
Nasal obstruction
Ocular symptoms
Nasal obstruction
Rhinorrhea
Nasal
hyperresponsiveness
To allergens
(priming)
To irritants and to
atmospheric
changes
IgE
allergen
dendritic cell
T-lymphocyte
cytokines
chemokines
allergen
B-lymphocyte
IgE
IL-4
IL-13
The Nasal Allergic Response
37. Stepwise Management of Allergic Rhinitis
Environmental control
Intermittent symptoms Persistent symptoms
Mild
• Oral H1-blocker or
• Intranasal H1
blocker
• and/or decongestant
• or LTRA
Moderate Mild
Severe
• Oral H1 blocker or
• Intranasal H1 blocker
• and/or decongestant or
• Intranasal CS
• or anti-leukotriene
Re-evaluate patient with
persistent symptoms in 2-4
weeks
Modified from ARIA workshop, 2001
Moderate
Severe
• Intranasal CS ±
• H1 blocker or
• anti-leukotriene
Re-evaluate in 2-4 weeks
Responsive:
Step down
Continue treatment
for > 1 month
Unresponsive:
Re-evaluate
compliance
diagnosis
infections
Add or
increase CS
Rhinorrhea:
add ipratropium
Congestion:
add decongestant
± short course of
oral CS
Unresponsive:
Immunotherapy
Consider surgical approaches (?)
Responsive:
Continue treatment
for 1 month
Unresponsive:
Step-up
38. Environmental Control
• House dust mites
• Pets
• Cockroaches
• Molds
• Pollen
1. Allergens
2. Pollutants and Irritants
39. Allergen Avoidance
• Pets
• Remove pets from bedrooms and, even better, from the entire home
• Vacuum carpets, mattresses and upholstery regularly
• Wash pets regularly (±)
• Molds
• Ensure dry indoor conditions
• Use ammonia to remove mold from bathrooms and other wet spaces
• Cockroaches
• Eradicate cockroaches with appropriate gel-type, non-volatile, insecticides
• Eliminate dampness, cracks in floors, ceilings, cover food; wash surfaces, fabrics to remove
allergen
• Pollen
• Remain indoors with windows closed at peak pollen times
• Wear sunglasses
• Use air-conditioning, where possible
• Install car pollen filter
40. House dust mite allergen avoidance
– Provide adequate ventilation to decrease humidity
– Wash bedding regularly at 60°
C
– Encase pillow, mattress and quilt in allergen impermeable covers
– Use vacuum cleaner with HEPA filter
– Dispose of feather bedding
– Remove carpets
– Remove curtains, pets and stuffed toys from bedroom
41. Environmental Control
• The most logical strategy for disease that relates to the
indoor environment
• Effectiveness requires comprehensive and multifaceted
measures
• More studies are needed to also address the role of
indoor pollutants (e.g. NO2, PMs, tobacco smoke,
endotoxin)
46. Simons, F. E. R. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2203
Simplified Two-State Model of the Histamine H1-Receptor
47. Sneezing Rhinorrhea Pruritus Nose Pruritus Eyes Congestion
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1 wk
4 wk
6 mo 1 wk
4 wk
6 mo 1 wk
4 wk
6 mo 1 wk
4 wk
6 mo 1 wk
4 wk
6 mo
Bachert C et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004:114:838
mean
Individual
symptom
score
improvement
Levocetirizine, 5 mg, N = 276
Placebo, N = 271
Efficacy of an Antihistamine over 6 Months in
Persistent Allergic Rhinitis
Baseline total symptom score: 8.95
* P<0.05
48. Placebo
N =201
Fexofenadine 120 mg
N =211
Fexofenadine 180 mg
N =202
Cetirizine 10 mg
N =207
*
* *
Change from
baseline in
total symptom
score
(AM, instantaneous,
trough)
0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
-2.5
-3.0
Newer Antihistamines are Equally Effective
in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis
Howarth P et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:927
*: <0.05 compared to placebo
50. • First line treatment for mild allergic rhinitis
• Effective for
– Rhinorrhea
– Nasal pruritus
– Sneezing
• Less effective for
– Nasal blockage
• Possible additional anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory effect
• In-vitro effect > in-vivo effect
• Minimal or no sedative effects
• Once daily administration
• Rapid onset and 24 hour duration of action
Newer Generation Oral Antihistamines
55. Mechanism of Action of Ipratropium Bromide
brain
RHINORRHEA
sensory
nerves
epithelium
submucosal glands
vidian nerve
Acetylcholine
on
muscarinic
receptors
X
X
direct effect of mediators:
not cholinergic
indirect effect:
cholinergic
56. Adapted from Meltzer E at al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;90:242
Efficacy of Ipratropium Bromide Against
Rhinorrhea in Allergic Rhinitis with Perennial Symptoms
6.0 3.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
*
*
*
*
* *
*
Ipratropium, 42 µg/nostril three times daily, N=42
Ipratropium, 21 µg/nostril three times daily, N=39
Placebo, N=42
Mean Severity
Score
(scale: 0-5)
Mean Duration
(hours/day)
Baseline Wk 4
Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Baseline Wk 4
Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3
* p<0.05 against Placebo
57. Anticholinergic Treatment: Ipratropium Bromide
• Nasal glands are activated by muscarinic, cholinergic receptors
• Ipratropium bromide is a nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist
• Ipratropium bromide applied intranasally blocks rhinorrhea induced by
cholinergic stimulation
• Ipratropium bromide has negligent systemic anticholinergic activity
• Topical adverse effects: excessive dryness, epistaxis
60. Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score
(0-3 point scale)
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
Adapted from Nayak, et al. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;88: 592
Change from
baseline
(mean, 95% CI)
mean baseline=2.0
* *
placebo, N=149
montelukast, N=155
loratadine, N=301
*p<0.01 vs placebo
Efficacy of a CysLT1 Receptor Antagonist
in Allergic Rhinitis with Seasonal Symptoms
61. Anti-Leukotriene Treatment in Allergic Rhinitis
Efficacy
• Equipotent to H1 receptor antagonists but with onset of
action after 2 days
• Reduce nasal and systemic eosinophilia
• May be used for simultaneous treatment of allergic
rhinitis and asthma
Safety
• Dyspepsia (approx. 2%)
63. Nasal Corticosteroids
reduction of
symptoms and exacerbations
reduction of
mucosal inflammation
reduction of
late phase reactions
priming
nasal hyperresponsiveness
1
reduction of
mucosal mast cells
reduction of
acute allergic reactions
2
• suppression of
glandular activity
and vascular leakage
• induction of
vasoconstriction
3
64. Onset of Action of Intranasal Budesonide Against
Allergen Exposure
(controlled environmental exposure - peak nasal inspiratory flow)
Day JH. et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105:489.
65. Mandl M. et al. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;79:370
Comparative Efficacy of Nasal Corticosteroids
66.
67.
68.
69. Adapted from Di Lorenzo et al. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;934:259
0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4
fluticasone, N=20
fluticasone + cetirizine, N=20
fluticasone + montelukast, N=20
placebo, N=20
cetirizine + montelukast, N=20
Average congestion score over 6 weeks
[95% CI]
*
Various Treatment Combinations in
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Nasal congestion score, Scale: 0-3
70. Adapted from Di Lorenzo et al. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;934:259
Average total symptom score over 6 weeks
[95% CI]
fluticasone, N=20
fluticasone + cetirizine, N=20
fluticasone + montelukast, N=20
cetirizine + montelukast, N=20
placebo, N=20
0 1 2 3 4 5
*
*
Various Treatment Combinations in
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
total symptom score
Scale: 0-12
71. Nasal Corticosteroids
• Most potent anti-inflammatory agents
• Effective in treatment of all nasal symptoms including
obstruction
• Superior to anti-histamines and anti-leukotienes
• First line pharmacotherapy for persistent allergic rhinitis
72. Nasal Corticosteroids
• Overall safe to use
• Adverse Effects
– Nasal irritation
– Epistaxis
– Septal perforation (extremely rare)
– HPA axis suppression (inconsistent and not clinically
significant)
– Suppressed growth (only in one study with
beclomethasone)
76. Subcutaneous Immunotherapy:
Effect on Serum Specific IgE
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Anti - ragweed
IgE
(ng/ml)
Initiation of
immunotherapy
August
November
baseline year 1 year 2 year 6 year 7 year 8
Adapted from: Peng et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;89:519
77. Long-Term Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy
Placebo Immunotherapy
80
60
40
20
May June July Aug.
Symptom
score
1989
Durham et al. N Eng J Med 1999;341:468
80 80
Immunotherapy continued
80
60
40
20
May June July Aug.
1993
60
40
20
May June July Aug.
Symptom
score
1994
60
40
20
May June July Aug.
1995
Immunotherapy discontinued
78. Dahl R et al., J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118:434.
Sublingual Immunotherapy in
Grass Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
Treatment: grass allergen
tablets
SLIT, N=316
Placebo, N=318
80. Efficacy of Omalizumab in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
(ragweed pollen season)
Average
weekly
symptom
score
Placebo, N=136
Omalizumab
50mg, N=137
150mg, N=134
300mg. N=129
4 13 20 27 3
Aug
10 17 24 1
Sep Oct
8 15 22 29
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Casale T, et al. JAMA 2001;286:2956
• SQ treatments every 3-4 weeks x 3-4
• First dose prior to the pollen season
81. Omalizumab and Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in
Children: Study design
Week 0 Week 12 Week 36
SIT titration SIT maintenance + study drug
Prescreening
SIT (grass) + omalizumab
SIT (birch) + omalizumab
SIT (birch) + placebo
SIT (grass) + placebo
n = 55
n = 54
n = 59
n = 53
Randomization
Kuehr J et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:274
82. 0
1.0
Omalizumab
Placebo
+ birch SIT
Omalizumab
Placebo
+ grass SIT
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
n=55
n=54 n=59
n=53
p<0.001
Omalizumab and Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in
Children: Symptom Load
(rescue medications + symptom severity scores)
grass pollen season
0.26
0.61
0.89
0.49
p=0.03
p=0.001
Symptom
load
score
(median)
Kuehr J et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:274
83. Anti IgE - Omalizumab
• Not licensed to treat allergic rhinitis
• Could be considered in severe cases unresponsive to
conventional treatment
• Could be an adjunct to immunotherapy in severe cases