1. ___SOUTH SEATTLE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE____________________________________
General Studies
Supervisor and Peer Evaluation Form
SUPERVISOR AND PEER EVALUATION FORM
Name of Probationer Jane Harness Date April 20, 2006
Class ESL 039.02 Math Meeting Time 12:00 – 1:15 P.M. Room CAS 320
Instructor Status: Probationary X
Part-Time_______________
Name of Evaluator David Rowe
Title & Subject Area Taught
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Instructions to Evaluator
1. Arrange to observe the instructor within a two-week time period indicated by
the Associate Dean. It is recommended that the evaluator review the course
syllabus and/or interview the instructor regarding course content and planning prior
to the classroom visitation. Please arrange by mutual agreement with the
instructor the class, time, and day in which the observation is to take place.
2. On this form, provide written comments concerning the "Areas of Evaluation"
listed on pages 2 and 3. Answer each question completely. (Feel free to attach
additional pages as necessary.)
3. Summarize your written assessment on the rating scale provided under
"Overall Evaluation of Classroom Performance."
4. Provide the instructor with a copy of the completed form and offer to meet
with him/her to discuss the content. The instructor should have opportunity to
respond under the "Instructor Response" section. This form must be signed by both
the instructor and the evaluator.
5. This instrument should be regarded as a professional development tool. It
provides the instructor with feedback and suggestions and creates an opportunity
for discussion of instructional planning and performance among peers.
Distribution: Instructor, Dean, Tenure Committee

2. Page 2
AREAS OF EVALUATION
Part I. Classroom Observation
(Note: The specific questions for evaluation will be developed by the tenure
committee and the faculty member during the first meeting during the first
probationary quarter.)
1. Instructor’s knowledge of subject area?
Thorough and comprehensive, entirely adequate
2. Are teaching techniques appropriate? (For example: Do classroom
discussions meet instructional goals? Has the instructor shaped
assignments that encourage student learning and growth?)
Classroom discussions involve students through a variety of means.
Not only are students asked to work collaboratively in groups, they
are also encouraged to provide their answers as Jane calls on them
throughout the lecture.
3. Does the instructor communicate coherently with the students both in class
and in feed -back on student assignments?
One of the first things that Jane does is go over the homework and
make sure that the concepts from previous lessons have been
absorbed prior to introducing new topics. Through the
introduction of new material, Jane is consistently mindful of the
comprehension of her class, deftly balancing the students’ need for
additional examples and possible methods with the introduction of
new material.
4. Is significant learning taking place in the classroom?
I believe so. I saw students come to more fully understand the
concepts of decimal
division, placement of numbers, as well as the introduction of
powers and roots; this happened through both their collaborative
and individual work.
5. Does the classroom performance show sufficient evidence of preparation?
Yes, Jane’s preparation is totally appropriate, based on the course
outline and syllabus, as well as the the materials of the previous
session.
6. How is the instructor sensitive to the needs of a diverse student population?
I stand by my previous response: Jane is wholly inclusive of all her
students, absolutely no one is made to feel exempt to the function
of the class; Jane will staunchly defend any student in the class,
insisting on respectful and gracious interactions at all times. This is
so important, especially as they work together for mutual
comprehension and is so gratifying to witness. All students’
questions and concerns are promptly addressed in an inclusive and
considerate fashion

3. 7. How does the instructor use technology appropriate to the subject matter?
Handouts and a whiteboard were as high tech as the class needed;
more
materials would have confused and detracted from the day’s lesson.
8. Is the course syllabus consistant with the course outline?
In every way. They both clearly explain the scope of the class and
detail the methods that will be used to achieve the stated learning
objectives.

4. Page 3
Part II. Course Preparation
1. Is the course content consistent with the course outline?
In every way. There are multiple references to the objectives of the
course, as well as examples in broad terms of how these objectives will
be met.
2. Is the course content logically sequenced and appropriate to the objectives of the
course?
It definitely seems so; there are no confusing leaps in the material. The
progression is logical at all times; each succeeding lesson introducing
new concepts while firming and expanding the scope of the previous
materials.
3. Is there a syllabus?
Yes
3a. Does the syllabus detail grading procedures?
Not applicable – non- credit course. However, the grading scale of the
GED exam is boldly marked in a section called Grading.
3b. Does the syllabus provide information concerning student responsibilities?
Most clearly. Here we see again Jane extolling and exhorting the
students to develop their interest in the class, to participate and take
responsibility for their own educational development.
3c. Does the syllabus provide students with adequate detail regarding
assignments and other information?
There is an Assessment section of the syllabus that details quite
clearly that a range of worksheets and homework assignments will
serve as ongoing determination of student preparedness for GED
testing.

5. Page 4
Instructor’s Response
____________________________________________________________________________
Overall Evaluation of Classroom Performance
__X___Excellent (Outstanding in classroom performance)
_____Satisfactory (Competent in classroom performance)
_____Needs Improvement (less than competent in classroom performance)
____________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator's Additional Comments
Jane consistently provides a safe and rewarding educational
atmosphere. Through her pertinent materials organization and
their dynamic and fluid delivery, Jane applies her dedication to
student comprehension and success in every aspect of her classes.
My pleasure at being allowed to observe her in a classroom
continues to grow as I note the masterful grace she applies in the
education of her students; her enthusiastic presentations against a
backdrop of communal endeavor are so rewarding.
____________________________________________________________________________
Suggestions For Improvement
____________________________________________________________________________
Instructor's Response
____________________________________________________
I hereby certify that I have read the preceding report and have had an opportunity
to discuss it with the evaluator. (Instructor's signature does not necessarily mean
complete agreement with the evaluation.
__________________________ _______________________
Evaluator's Signature Date
__________________________ _______________________
Instructor's Signature Date
a/teneval1.doc

6. Page 4
Instructor’s Response
____________________________________________________________________________
Overall Evaluation of Classroom Performance
__X___Excellent (Outstanding in classroom performance)
_____Satisfactory (Competent in classroom performance)
_____Needs Improvement (less than competent in classroom performance)
____________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator's Additional Comments
Jane consistently provides a safe and rewarding educational
atmosphere. Through her pertinent materials organization and
their dynamic and fluid delivery, Jane applies her dedication to
student comprehension and success in every aspect of her classes.
My pleasure at being allowed to observe her in a classroom
continues to grow as I note the masterful grace she applies in the
education of her students; her enthusiastic presentations against a
backdrop of communal endeavor are so rewarding.
____________________________________________________________________________
Suggestions For Improvement
____________________________________________________________________________
Instructor's Response
____________________________________________________
I hereby certify that I have read the preceding report and have had an opportunity
to discuss it with the evaluator. (Instructor's signature does not necessarily mean
complete agreement with the evaluation.
__________________________ _______________________
Evaluator's Signature Date
__________________________ _______________________
Instructor's Signature Date
a/teneval1.doc