Virtue Ethics Theory Essay

Virtue Ethics Theory Essay
1. Why are Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle usually considered to be the founders of Western philosophical ethics? * Because it was their determination to
base ethics on reason, rather than on superstition or authority, laid the foundation upon which virtually all philosophers who followed would base their
ideas and theories about morality.
2. Why do many people consider Socrates to be a martyr for truth and integrity? * Socrates is considered by many to be a martyr for truth and integrity
because of his courage and adherence to traditional beliefs. He was charged with charges of atheism, treason, and corrupting the youth of Athens – all
death penalties, just for trying to question tradition. In spite of all the powerful people...show more content...
Which are the best virtues? Which virtues are controversial? There are many different lists of key virtues and the inability to find a logical basis for
the best virtues to live presents a chronic difficulty for modern day adherents of virtue ethics. 2) Secondly, Virtue Ethics can lead to ethical relativism
because powerful groups select the virtues for their society. Is one nation morally better than another? If all virtues are equal in worth, can
everyone pick their preferred virtues as individuals? 3) Third, in Aristotle's version, is that his foundational premise may be a fallacy. What we
ought to be is based on what we are. Critics have referred to this as the naturalistic fallacy, an offshoot of the is/ought fallacy. Human nature is a
certain way; therefore we ought to act that way. 4) Lastly, looking at moral right and wrong only through the virtue ethics window can lead to a kind
of "character trap." This theory is basically about being a good person. Most people think that they are already good, so how good is good enough?
13. Explain the assumptions behind John Locke's natural rights theory. * Humans have rights – morally authorized claims that impose legitimate
obligations (duties). * Rights come from God or nature. * Rights are the foundations of ethics. * The individual is more important than the group. *
Human nature is self–interest. * We have a moral duty or obligation to avoid violating the rights of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Virtue Ethics : A Theory Of Morality
Virtue Ethics is a theory of morality. It only takes into account the individuals themselves when distinguishing morality. As defined in the Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Virtue Ethics is the theory that "emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach which emphasizes
duties or rules (deontology) or that which emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism)." It is because of it's seemingly "rule less"
structure that the theory has shown appeal. Virtue ethics places the emphasis on the type of person performing the action as oppose to action itself.
This leaves room for the importance of character and a greater emphasis on the intentions of the person rather than the consequences or rules as above
stated. This also means that people can learn to improve their moral life by becoming more virtuous. Those in oppose to Virtue Ethics argue that the
rules of deontology and consequentialism provide the rigid action guidance lacking in v–ethics and because of this, what is "right" or "good" is'
obliviously' more clearly defined. Without clarity in what is right/good, how can we know what is more virtuous of a decision? In this paper is will
refute the objections to virtue ethics stating that virtue ethics, (1.) Does not specify what the "right action" is and (2.) Does not provide action guidance.
Firstly, a definition of "right" and is needed to understand the basis of which we will be discussing virtue ethics. According to Rosalind

Essay On Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics: The ethics of being. This week in our course in Ethics lead us to the topic of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics. Aristotle is thought of to be the
first to write about the concept of Virtue Ethics, but humanity has realized its existence before Aristotle by just living their everyday life in society. The
virtues of honesty, courage, and dependability were sought after in social interactions while their respective vices of dishonesty, cowardice, and
unreliability were less attractive. In living amongst one another–– much to the same scope of what is discussed in Professor Nancy Rosenblum 's Good
Neighbors: The Democracy of Everyday Life in America–– virtues hold their relevance in how we treat one another, and the actions of our...show more
content...
As I have said before Virtue Ethics are only important because we interpret and witness the virtues of others everyday in our life, and right there is
where Virtue Ethics diverge from the other theories: Virtue Ethics deal with life. If Virtue Ethics are the ethics of being, then they are the ethics that
describe people; but not a person in one specific situation (as used in the hypothetical situations that defended our prior theories), but all that person's
actions used to calculate their levels of virtue. That neighbor making noise late at night is not morally evil, and the neighbors that keep to themselves
could also not be perfectly virtuous, but neighbors and society are in fact determined to be in a balancing act between the two... according to Virtue
Ethics. I also noticed that the Social Contract theory from last lesson is very much connected to Virtue Ethics, and even more related to the topic of
good neighboring. Professor Rosenblum in the podcast spoke about this concept of Reciprocity. A neighbor engaging in reciprocity with another
neighbor–– in such cases as the act of lending a ladder when it is requested, and the person that received the ladder engaging in reciprocating that
neighbor's action by helping the neighbor that offered the ladder with a similar act to repay the person for their initial virtuous deed–– is an act of the
Social Contract's mutual benefit. If Social Contract is to specifically

An Argument On Virtue Ethics Essay
Hursthouse might respond to this objection that moral philosophy is sufficient for a virtuous person to make a decision in any given circumstances
because it guides the person to be certain not in making the correct decision but in having virtuous intention. A person's virtuous intention is based not
by what end it reaches. It is by what action is made. Hursthouse might argue in our given example that the surgeon's action is certain because he makes
a decision with the intention to save a life of a patient instead of losing two. In addition, Hursthouse might claim that this act of virtuous intention is
reasoned in terms of what a virtuous person would do. However, this response fails to recognize that certainty is not just In this paper, I will critically
examine Rosalind Hursthouse's argument on "Virtue Ethics" about the reasoning of a virtuous person by delving into the topic. I will then expose a
particular problem within it. Perhaps the strongest point of the argument on "Virtue Ethics" that Hursthouse gives relies on the claim of moral
philosophy. Moral philosophy claims that a virtuous person would act and make decisions like what a virtuous person would do. In this paper, I will
focus on Hursthouse's argument on the certainty of a virtuous person, offer an objection to the argument, and demonstrate how Hursthouse might
respond to that objection.
Virtue ethics is a theory of ethics in moral philosophy in which it emphasizes that the notion of virtue is key to a

Kant vs. Virtue Ethics Essay
When we talk about whether or not a person is ethically right, we can look at the actions that he or she may partake in. These actions maybe studied in
different situations such as the one that we were told to evaluate. While leaving the grocery store, one witnesses an old man struggling with his oxygen
tank. Without thinking, you lift the tank and help the elderly man. This action is a kind gesture, but would we consider this a moral act? One could
analyze this situation with two different ethical theories, by Kantian and/or Aristotelian views. The approach that we take with Kant's views is strictly
based on reason. The key factor in this situation with Kant would ask if we did this action without any thought. Because Kant heavily...show more
content...
(This is not saying whether or not the action was moral or not.) On the other hand, Aristotle would take a different approach. Aristotle believed invirtue
ethics. This type of theory bases all on moderation. It also asks the question of what makes a person moral, instead of what acts are moral. Reason
is directly correlated with a virtue that we have become accustom to. When evaluating this situation, we have to ask, "What is a virtue?" Virtues
are traits of a person's character that are habitual actions that are good for that particular person to possess. We also need to know character traits of
the virtue. These character traits consist of things like being nice to each other, sharing your possessions with those less fortunate, caring for people,
etc. With this incident we know that you are showing compassion, thoughtfulness, friendliness, etc by helping this elderly man. By having these
qualities you did not have to think about what you were doing and you assisted the man because of you possessed these virtues. So in this situation,
Aristotle would say that it was a moral act. You are a virtuous person that is why you did the action. It was habitual and the reason you did it was
because it was directly correlated to the virtues you possessed. Aristotle and Kant's views were extremely different. Aristotle believed that it was a
moral action and Kant believed it wasn't. These two views are so different because the bases of each theory are very

Theories Of Virtue Ethics
1.According to virtue ethicists, virtues are developed by routine. The majority of virtue ethics philosophies take their motivation from Aristotle who
stated that a virtuous being is somebody who has supreme character qualities. These qualities stem from innate inner predispositions, but need to be
cultivated; yet, once seeded, they will grow to be firm. For instance, a virtuous individual is somebody who is thoughtful through several circumstances
throughout a lifetime, as that is their personality and not because they want to get the most value or increase favors or merely do their obligation.
Contrasting deontological and consequentialist philosophies, notions of virtue ethics do not have the intention to predominantly isolate general values
that can be functional in any ethical circumstances. And virtue ethics concepts manage broader demands such as how one should live and what are the
correct familial and social values.
2....show more content...
Situationist psychology is a theory that behavior is a main response to immediate situations. Situationism is the psychology of the individual in social
psychology, as influenced by one or more other people, who make up the social situation. The concept of situationism is that the theory suggests that
behavior is the primarily response to an immediate situations. In other words, you are going to act however the majority of the people you are around
act and that is simply because of the situation and acceptance from the majority. The impact of situationism on individual behavior can cause someone
that is normally quiet to be loud because the situation may demand them to be. Situationism can really have an impact on your personality by changing
how you perceive a situation and, in return, how you react to

Example Of Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics talks about a person being pure and exemplary or someone that is always willing to do the right thing. For example, if someone is
making a bad decision then a virtuous person might encourage he or she to do the correct thing. Care ethics talks about a person having the need to
care for someone's feelings and what is important. An example would be if someone you don't know seems upset, a person who shows care ethics
would be caring towards her and give them a hug. In this dilemma, I believe that the woman should save her friend's child first and get him to the
shore immediately. Then right away she should try her best to save her own child. If the friend's child is closer to the woman, then it should be more
reasonable that she

Essay on Virtue Ethics
Virtue, when I hear that word I think of value and morality and only good people can be virtuous. When I hear the word ethics I think of good versus
evil, wrong and right. Now when the two are put together you get virtue ethics. You may wonder what can virtue ethics possibly mean. It's just two
words put together to form some type of fancy theory. Well this paper will discussvirtue ethics and the philosophy behind it.
Virtue ethics is a theory that focuses on character development and what virtues one should obtain to be who they are supposed to be, as oppose to
actions. An example of virtue ethics would be someone who is patient, kind, loving, generous, temperance, courage and flourishing as oppose to a
person who lies, cheats, and...show more content...
Moral relativism explains a point that when it comes to morals, right or wrong, people have their own opinion. Not everyone will think something is
bad and not everyone will think something is good. The difference between moral relativism and virtue ethics is that actions do not matter. It is the
type of person you are on the inside. Who you are on the inside will help you make righteous decisions, regardless of the circumstances. "An ethics
focused on virtue encourages us to develop the good traits and get rid of the bad ones (Mackinnon)."
Virtue ethics was written by a Greek philosopher names Aristotle. Aristotle believed that every human's goal was happiness. Some philosophers
argued that happiness only came from following a set of rules, while Aristotle argued that the best way to have happiness is to cultivate a virtuous
character. The two kinds of virtues he recognized were moral virtue and intellectual virtue. The virtue that should be focused on to develop a virtuous
character is moral virtue. According to Aristotle, while we are born with a capacity to be virtuous, being virtuous is like a skill that we need to learn
and practice to be good at. The key element to being virtuous is being able to find the mean or right amount of our various emotions, dispositions, and
actions. Aristotle wrote: "Anybody can become angry– that is easy, but to be angry with the right person and to the right degree and at the right time
and for

Virtue Essays
Virtue
Virtues contribute to people's actions in today's society. Society as a whole has a common set of virtues that many people agree on. In today's society,
these are known as laws. Virtues also mold the individual outlook on life, and give them the moral's to do what is right. In The Republic,Plato divides
the city into three classes: gold, silver, as well as bronze and iron souls. Each class is designated to posses a specific virtue. He believes that wisdom,
courage, moderation, and justice combine together to form The Republic. However, Plato's four virtues individually do not necessarily produce a
utopian society. A combination of the four in each citizen is imperative in producing the ideal society. In Plato's search for the
...show more content...
Plato used the dyeing analogy to state how he wishes to train the silver souls (429d– 430b). He states that the people will undergo a precise training.
Certain music and physical activity will only be allowed. Plato wanted a good upbringing to make the right ideas permanent in them, so that the bleach
of pleasure, grief, fear, or death, would not wash the true colors from their souls. "For, in my opinion, you regard the right opinion about these same
things that comes to be without education– that found in beast and slaves– as not at all lawful and call it something other than courage" (430b). Once
they got to this point of having a clear, firm grasp of what is really dangerous to a man, they knew their only task was to show courage. The third
virtue in The Republic, is moderation. The Greek term for moderation is Sophrosune. Plato defines moderation as the kind of accord and harmony
between the bronze and silver souls. Moderation is the ability to control desires and to be the master of ones self. There are two things at work in a
man's heart. One is good, and one is bad. The bad can overwhelm the good. If the people have bad training or keep company with the wrong people,
the bad force grows powerful and can overwhelm the good. If the good one controls them, then there is moderation; but if the bad one controls, they
are a slave to their own desires and that they are out of control or unprincipled. "If, therefore, any city ought to be designed

Ethics
Virtue and Patience
In order to survive these days, there need to be at least some standards and goals of morality in a person's life. Moral excellence is definitely hard to
achieve, but is something worth while to attempt. Personally, there are many distractions and obstructions the present day provides, creating a
difficulty of direction in my own life. I need to overcome obstacles such as peer pressure in order to become a confident, successful person. The
present day provides impediments which I believe I can overcome by way of morality and virtue. I have chosen to work on more patience in my life.
According to Aristotle, for every virtue there are two vices. One is in excess and the other being deficit. Patience is a...show more content...
Never noticing it, I never tried to correct it. Now in the morning I have her to calm me down. We are working on it together. And I am most
definitely improving. I recall writing in my journal about how I feel anger and frustration when I am waiting around. This coincides with the part
of the definition about delay. Through my journaling process I realized that I get most frustrated when I have a time to be somewhere and I know I
am going to be late. I am also frustrated in anything and everything that hinders my path. On the other hand, if I have not specific time to be
somewhere, then I don't feel any part of being impatient. For example, when I was coming back to the dorm from my home town, I was in traffic for
and hour. Ordinarily, if I had to be back at a specific time, I would have been antsy and swearing at the traffic when it is out of my control.Plato had a
theory of the charioteer. In this theory, there is a person who represents reason, and two horses. One represents will power and spirit and the other
the persons appetites and desires. I believe that all three are involved in be becoming more patient. I have to be able to come up with reasons why I
am impatient and reason out the pros and cons of my decisions. The will power is enormous because if it wasn't for the will power I would have just
quit after failing to have more patience. Finally, I desire to become more patient so that also boosts my will power up.
The great literary icon

Virtue Ethics Essay
In our society, I think most people relate happiness to physical and material pleasures. Happiness fluctuates as the new thing you had to have grows
old. Trying to "keep up with the Jones" does not bring happiness in life. Hursthouse (2012) noted, "Virtue ethics claims that a human life devoted to
physical pleasure or the acquisition of wealth is not flourishing, happy or living well, but a wasted life" (pp. 2). Personally, someone that is deceitful,
selfish, greedy, self–indulgent, and yet enjoys great pleasure and appears to be quite happy would seem to not be flourishing. Aristotle ties people
who practice good deed tend to be happy and flourish in life (Aristotle, 1931). Mosser (2013) noted, "For Aristotle, the virtuous person, is someone

Aristotle Virtue Ethics Essays
Aristotle's Virtue Ethics
The philosophy of virtue ethics, which primarily deals with the ways in which a person should live, has puzzled philosophers from the beginning of
time. There are many contrasting interpretations regarding how one should live his or her life in the best way possible. It is in my opinion that the
Greeks, especially Aristotle, have exhibited the most logical explanation of how to live the "good life". The following paper will attempt to offer a
detailed understanding of Aristotle's reasoning relating to his theory of virtue ethics. In order to explain the fundamentals of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics,
one must acknowledge his primary motive in this study, which is to understand what it means to live well. Unlike...show more content...
To find out what the function of a human being is, Aristotle looks at what is distinctive about humans. He discovers that the good of the human is to
act in accord with reason well, which can translate into acting in accord with virtue. One cannot have happiness without virtue, just as it is impossible
to be virtuous with the absence of rational thinking. Because man is a rational creature, rather than plants which are vegetative, happiness for man must
include the excellent functioning of the rational faculties.
Aristotle found that there are two kinds of virtues of the soul. First, there are virtues of thought, such as wisdom. Next, there are virtues of character,
such as generosity. The main focus of his virtue ethics lies in the virtues of character. Aristotle assumed that these virtues are learned through habit.
For example, whereas intellectual virtue may arise from reading a book, the adoption of virtuous character is inherited solely by practice. Therefore,
it is through a person's upbringing that moral virtues are cultivated, and it is through the habit of thinking virtuously that one can excel towards
happiness. It is important to note that virtue not just a matter of behavior. If someone performs an act of generosity but is pained by it, then he or she
is not really generous (does not really possess the virtue of generosity), and has not really acted generously. This can be deceiving at times, because it
is easily disguised from the

Understanding Virtue Ethics
Noe Beltran
Per. 4
12/6/16
Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics is the theory which is centered on character rather than focused on actions. An individual's actions are the main element of ethical thinking
rather than actions themselves (which is known as Deontology) or their consequences (which is known as consequentialism). A virtuous character
would have to have virtuous traits. Some traits include courage, patience, and truthfulness. To understand virtue ethics one must first understand the
virtues that make a good human being. A virtue is defined as a behavior showing high moral standards. For example, a common characteristic quality
displaying a virtue would be honesty. If someone is honest, They are believed to never lie or cheat which...show more content...
Not only this, but there is also a common burden of virtue ethics is that it does not produce a solid base of principles since having virtues is unable
to guide or justify good actions. Virtue ethicists also face the reality that adequacy is a problem because a person does not need virtuous traits to
perform a good action, not only that but if a virtuous person were to cause a wrongful action, it does not always have to mean that they are still not
a virtuous person.To put this into perspective, if a murderer were to kill someone, and walk away from the crime, and he sees a homeless man and
the murderer gives the homeless man a dollar, he has just performed a good deed. Or if lets say a priest was to curse in church, it does not mean he is
not a virtuous person. Virtue ethics also is problematic because of its relativism. Its relativism is a big issue to this because every culture has different
ways of defining virtues. Which means that everyone following virtue ethics would ultimately disagree with each other about

Virtue Ethics
Introduction
Virtue ethics is a theory used to make moral decisions. It does not rely on religion, society or culture; it only depends on the individuals themselves.
The main philosopher of Virtue Ethics is
Aristotle. His theory was originally introduced in ancient Greek times. Aristotle was a great believer in virtues and the meaning of virtue to him meant
being able to fulfil one's functions. Virtue ethics is not so much interested in the question 'What should I do?' but rather in the question 'what sort of
person should I become?' It has more to do with character and the nature of what it is to be human, than with the rights and wrongs of actions. Instead
of concentrating on what is the right thing to do, virtue ethics asks...show more content...
Aristotle says we are most likely to acquire virtues by observing others in our society. If we experience other people being kind to us and see the
happiness it creates we are more likely to practice this virtue then if we were just told to practice it. Aristotle said that the best way of becoming
virtuous was to follow in the footsteps of a virtuous person, e.g. Mother Theresa.
Aristotle said that a virtue was a 'Golden Mean' in between two vices.
These Vices are two extremes of the scale; one vice of excess and one vice of deficiency. For example, for the virtue 'modesty', the vice of excess
would be bashfulness and the vice of deficiency would be shamelessness. Aristotle mentions 12 virtues that all fall between two vices. Some examples
of these virtues are honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self
–control, and prudence. Such virtues must be refined; we
must learn when to use certain virtues and make sure that they do not fall into the vices; in other words we must use them in moderation. For example
we must not ever use modesty in excess as we will become bashful, but at the same time we must also not pass into the vice of
deficiency–shamelessness.
Virtue Ethics is dependent; Aristotle realised that virtues in one country or society may not be the same as virtues in another. As virtues have

What Is Virtue Ethics
Chapter nine talks about the environment within and virtues. Christian virtue ethics focus on the end of an act instead of on the consequences because
the end says more about the agent (p.164, M). If one person does something that doesn't seem of good virtue, then Christian virtue won't judge that
person till the end because their means for doing something could be different than one thinks. The goal of virtue ethics is not better decisions but better
deciders (p.164, M). Virtue ethics is about an individual making a decision that may or may not be a good one. Then, people outside of that decision
have to decide if that individual's decision was worth changing or leaving it be. Environmental virtue ethics aims for the formation of good people,
because good...show more content...
For example: courage is a virtue, but excessive courage is recklessness (a vice), and insufficient courage is cowardice (also a vice) (p.167, M).
Therefore, a virtue must have the right amount of balance or it becomes a vice. Some virtues are called "dirty" virtues. Calling virtues "dirty" is a way
of reminding people of their intrinsic connectedness with dirt and with everything around them (p.170, B). A "dirty" virtue is a virtue that is connected
to the earth and it's environment. Dirty virtues help people to live in good relationship with the animals, plants, water, air, and earth that are our
neighbors and without which we would not survive (p.170–171, B–T). These virtues are the ones that drive people to protect the environment and see
that nature is something that we need to survive and cannot continue to destroy. However, virtues are something that are developed as one continues to
put them into action. Not all virtues are ones that we are born with. Virtues are acquired and continually perfected as one practices being the kind of
individual one wants to be (p.171,

Examples Of Virtue Ethics
Phil 1404 Written Assignment Unit 2
1
Phil 1404 Written Assignment Unit 2: Virtue Ethic
XXX XXX
University of the People
2
Both deontological and teleological moral theories are called deontic or actions simply because they focus wholly upon the actions which some one
works established theories of morality.
Those theories concentrate on the question, which actions should be taken. Virtueethics, nevertheless, take a very distinct view. (Athanassoulis, n.d.)
Virtue–based ethical philosophies stress less on which rules people focus on but assisting individuals develop good character qualities like generosity
and kindness. (Athanassoulis, n.d.)
These personality characteristics may, consequently, enable anyone...show more content...
Every one of all these are called immoralities and stand –in the way of being a man that was good.
(Athanassoulis, n.d.)
It goes back towards primeval Ancient Greek thinkers and is consequently the earliest form of ethical theory in Western philosophy, despite the fact that
nowadays virtue ethics was not a particularly general topic for research. Plato pointed out four essential virtues: courage, wisdom, temperance and
justice. Aristotle penned down the primary methodical outline of virtue ethics as part of his distinguished work Nichomachean Ethics. In line with
Aristotle, when people obtain good practices of character, they can be able to better regulate their reasoning together with their feelings. This,
consequently, allows us to attain morally right decisions any time we are confronted with choices that are complicated. (Bbc.co.uk, n.d.)
3
One reason they make an imperative impact to our knowledge of virtue and morality ethics may be common is simply because they emphasize the
essential part played by intentions in moral issues. (Bbc.co.uk, n.d.)
To behave from virtue is definitely to act from some special motivation; so to say that

Over Virtue Ethics Summary
In week four of ethics we went over chapters 8, 9 and 10. Chapter 8 was over Virtue Ethics, chapter 9 was about feminists thought and the ethics of
care, and chapter 10 was about euthanasia. These three topics were very interesting to me, but one in particular topic that was interesting for me was
the chapter on virtue ethics. This chapter stood out the most for me because it is so important to have good character no matter what you are
personally going through or what has happened to you in your life it is always important to give others respect and treat them how you would like to
be treated. Virtues are good character traits, for example courage, loyalty, self sacrifice, and patriotism. They are the traits that make a person good.
According

Virtue Ethics Research Paper
Another reason as to why Virtue Ethics doesn't offer a successful approach to ethical decision making is because it relies too heavily on the character
of individuals. For example Milgram's experiment proved that normal citizens of society are nearly always likely to follow orders of an authority
figure even when the lives of innocent people are at risk. The experiment showed that 65% of participants continued to electrocute fellow partakers up
to 450 volts, just because they were told to. Virtue ethics is not act based and instead agent centred. In a given ethical decision the question asked
would be 'what kind of person should I aim to become'. Aristotle believed that when we are young 'that is the time at which the character is being
formed'.

Virtue Ethics Approach Essay examples
1.Identify the main pros and cons of a virtue ethics approach?
The virtue ethics approach is a theory that suggests that people are judged via their character, not specific actions. An individual who has developed
good character traits (virtues) is judged as a morally good person. An individual who has developed bad character traits (vices) is judged as a morally
bad person. Most of us have a mixture or virtues and vices. There are many pros and cons linked to this approach. The pros include
a.Emphasis on pleasure and emotion – it is good that we should enjoy acting virtuously
b.Moral education – being moral is a developmental process
c.Consideration of life as a whole – "One swallow does not make a spring" (Aristotle, 1976)
d.No...show more content...
She trusts the original diagnosis and refuses a second treatment. The hospital is an institution that should be careful since it is trusted. Medical staffs
are usually accorded with virtues like compassion and trustworthiness. Looking at these facts, the moral assessment might be quite different. The
doctors may deduce that a different course of action would be virtuous.
3.What are the limitations / disadvantages of using this approach?
The approach offers no solution to the specific moral dilemma within this case. The difficulty with virtue ethics is that it does not openly specify which
deeds are virtuous. What may appear virtuous to one individual may not be to the next. Everybody has their own suggestion of virtue in whichever
circumstances once it is assessed, and even if they act with good objectives, it may not bring out the best in the circumstances.
4.A. For your critique use your own experience of applying virtues PLUS what does the literature say?
B. Does the literature support your assessment of the approach? (REFERENCED) put reference one for A and B
If for instance, an adult patient was a 19 year old born into a Jehovah's Witness community who felt a compulsion to make choices anchored in his
parents' faith scheme while not truthfully believing it, the moral appraisal may be rather changed. The doctor may presume that an altered course of
action would be virtuous. By

Virtue Ethics Theory Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from CustomWrittenCollege

More from CustomWrittenCollege (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Virtue Ethics Theory Essay