Summary Of Nature Vs Nurture

Summary Of Nature Vs Nurture
The idea of the book has many negative speculations. The negative assumptions have been hard to overlook throughout history and continues in present
day. There is no way of knowing how much the concept has been altered all through the years. The misconception touched about in this book is that
importance of the first years of a child's life; the development of the brain and its capacities. The subject introduced has nothing to do with the nurture
vs nature theory. During the development of a child genetics are an important factor, but it is not the most important when determining the intelligence
of an individual. The most important element to a child's intelligence development is the baby's environment. The baby's surrounding can change
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Nurture Vs Nature
One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the debate between nature vs nurture. Nature being our genetics determining our behavior,
personality traits, and abilities, while nurture being our environment, upbringing, and life determining our behavior. One of the most prompted debates
on the subject is genetic and environmental influences on criminal behavior. Whether its the responsibility of an individual's genetic makeup makes
them a criminal or whether their environment in which they raised develops that outcome. Research has been done on this debate from numerous
studies, and the overall conclusion being that both genes and environment play a role in the criminal behavior involving an individual. The reason
being, having inherited genes for criminal behavior does not determine the actions of an individual, but if they are subjected to the right environment,
then their chances are much greater for engaging in criminal or anti–social behavior.
First of all, in order to fully understand how genes and environment influence criminal behavior, one must first know how criminal behavior is defined.
According to law, criminal behavior refers to conduct of an offender that leads to and including the commission of an unlawful act. In other words, a
unlawful criminal act occurs when there is a motive, a means, and an opportunity. Therefore, determining what establishes criminal behavior can entail
a wide range of actions and for that reason, researchers tend to

Differences Between Nature Vs Nurture Essay
Throughout this paper, we will be comparing similarities and differences between our seven members based on the Big Five Inventory test results
to our Zodiac sign attributes. Each member of Psychology 101 Group 14 was required to take the OCEAN Big Personality Quiz, and then
compare the results to the other members of the team. Then after looking at the results individual members compared their scores to their Zodiac
signs to see if they could identify similarities. To begin, while looking at our comparatives scores of the OCEAN Big 5 Personality quizzes, we
found that a few group members were similar, although there was many differences in the group too. For example, Gabe and Damon were similar
in Openness, with a score of 41 and 35 respectively. On the other hand, Socoro and Vivianna were outliers in the group, with Vivianna having a
score of 5, and Socoro with a score of 59. We believe while the scores are closely related, our reasons for being close together in Openness value
more shows the debate between nature vs nurture. Gabe's belief on being in the 35th percentile is how he was raised throughout his family
environment similar to Kaitlyn in the 41st percentile, while Damon's belief for being in the 41st percentile was more so being born into the statistic
rather than recalling any events that contributed to his score. Rachael scored in the 16th percentile, which indicates a preference of a more regular
schedule. She believes that this is because of how she

Essay on Nature vs Nurture
Nature vs. Nurture
M. B.
Liberty University
Psychology 101
Nature vs. Nurture There has been extensive debate between scholars in the field of psychology surrounding the Nature vs. Nurture issue. Both nature
and nurture determine who we are and neither is solely independent of the other. "As the area of a rectangle is determined by its length and its width,
so do biology and experience together create us."(Myers, 2008, p. 8) Carl Gustav Jung, and leading thinker and creator of analytical psychology,
believes: "Human behavior is influenced both by individual experience and also by an innate "collective unconscious" that vests all of us with certain
proclivities and tendencies."(Hayes, 2000, p. 7) From my personal life experience...show more content...
History
The history of the Nature vs. Nurture began with Darwin's theory of evolution and natural selection. At one time, entire cultural groups were considered
to be inferior or superior by nature and ethnicity. During the late Middle Ages, philosophers began to recognize differences among groups dependent on
their socialization or nurture. Nature vs. Nurture began to be controversial in the 20th Century when the Nazis began to destroy humans of a certain
nature to develop the perfect human race. This prompted psychological debate on whether human identity was by nature or subject to socialism by
nurture. (Prien, Pitts, & Kamery, 2003, p. 51)
Characteristics
The characteristics of nature vs. nurture are quite different. Nature is those qualities about a person that are deemed genetic. Such genetics heritability
includes a person's color and gender. Nature is a person's biological determinism. Characteristics of nurture include environmental variation and external
influences. These characteristics are dependent on such factors as social status and education and the influence these factors have on a person's
character. In my opinion, both nature and nurture uniformly determine of person's personality and intelligence. This opinion is widely debated but not
debunked.
Concluding Thoughts
John Tooby and Leda Cosmides, two highly respected and influential people in the nature vs. nurture study state, "Evolutionary psychology is not just
another

Nature vs. Nurture Essay
Nature vs. Nurture
When we look at the world around us today, we are struck by the amazing diversity that we see in people. There is a vast diversity in the
characteristics of people that are immediately obvious: short, tall; fat, thin; Asian, Caucasian; and many other characteristics. Each person as an
individual is unique, be it in physical outlook or character. How is it that of the 6 billion people on Earth, there are no 2 individuals who are exactly
alike? Every persons physical and psychological characteristics are determined by many factors, and these can be divided into 2 main groups: our genes
and our environment, or nature and nurture.
What are our genes? Genes are the chemical blueprint unique to each person. Different...show more content...
This shows that even in similar environments, differences will still arise regardless of their genetic constitution, i.e. minor variations will result in large
differences in phenotype regardless of genotype.
Human behaviour is a complex interaction between genes and the environment. In its more advanced forms, behaviour is not determined by genes. For
example, the most common behaviour found in adults of any race is the use of language, whereas in newborns, language must be taught. If it was
genetically determined, then the baby should be able to speak once born: the tongue and throat would not have to distort into positions they are not
used to. Primitive behaviour is more likely to be genetically programmed into an individual. For example, the sucking and grasping reflexes of a
newborn infant are present even in the womb, before any interaction with the environment is possible. These behavioural traits may involve reflex arcs
present only in newborns because after some time, the individuals no longer behave in this manner. Perhaps cultural influences cause an inhibition of
the neural pathway (such as the mother telling the infant to stop sucking it's thumb). The majority of behavioural traits are acquired later in the
development of an individual. Most people go through very strange behavioural changes in the course of their development, especially during

Essay on Human Development: Nature vs. Nurture
The nature versus nurture debate is an old issue within the field of psychology.
"The nature–nurture issue is a perennial one that has resurfaced in current psychiatry as a series of debates on the role that genes (DNA) and
environments play in the etiology and pathophysiology of mental disorders" (Schaffner)
The debate is essentially about what is inherited (nature) and what is experienced by environmental factors (nurture) and how they affect human
development. Naturally, the nature versus nurture debate relates to many controversies such as intelligence, gender identities, violent behaviors, and
sexual orientation.
There are countless studies on whether intelligence is an inherited trait or if it is influenced by environmental...show more content...
Based on these conclusions made by the study, it is acceptable to infer that there is a greater difference in intelligence that can be attributed to
hereditary factors. The results also show what a drastic change that hereditary factors can impose on intelligence; I found this quite interesting as I
previously thought that environmental factors would influence studying patterns and etc. Though the study was conducted in a professional manner,
the theory of possessing more intelligence based on hereditary conditions would need to be researched more. There are ongoing studies on the
nature–nurture and intelligence question.
Another study on intelligence has shown:
"A definite tendency for children in homes of higher socio–economic status, especially those with more highly educated parents, to make above
average scores after two years of age, whereas children whose parents have less education make lower scores" (Bayley).
Based on this and the aforementioned study, we can see where controversy can occur. Both studies claim to have taken into account environmental
factors, but the second study concludes that environmental factors do play a role in the development of intelligence of children. The two differing
viewpoints are what cause the debate. According to Kendra Cherry, "The majority of experts believe that behavior and development are influenced by
both nature and nurture..." If this were proven to be true, both

Nurture Vs. Nature
A problem with the debate about nurture vs. nature is that the debate is trying to explain a complex problem with a very open solution. There is no
depth in believing that a person's whole existence and cooperation in this world is based on nature and nurture. I believe that we are all shaped by both
nurture and nature components at some points of our lives.
A children's brain is like an empty canvas to a sense that you can shape it in any way you want. You can shape the children's morals and you can
also shape his way of thinking. A children's brain picks up information like a sponge. If good morals are taught to the children and if whoever raises
him shows to be a good role model, then the child will be raised appropriately.
There is no

Nature Vs. Nurture
Scientists have been investigating about genetic inheritance and its influence on behavior in humans. A gene is the unit of heredity that is passed on
from parent to offspring. These investigations have been conducted because there has been a lot of debate about whether human behavior is more
influenced by genetics or the environment. This debate is also called "Nature Vs. Nurture". Although there is a clear correlation between genetics and
behavior, genetic inheritance only has a partial influence due to the environmental factors that also play a role in shaping behavior. This statement can
be supported by correlational studies that have been performed by numerous scientists over many years. Correlational studies are used to investigate if
two variables have a relationship with each other, without actually knowing if one causes the other. Scientists use twin and adoption cases for the
correlational study of genes and environment with behavior as it allows specific variables to be tested. For example, since twins share the same genetic
information, analyzing pairs of twins when they are in different environments helps scientists record a correlation between genes and environment with
behavior. Adoptive studies also help see if different environments have a bigger influence than genes on behavior by comparing a child's behavior with
with their biological and adoptive parents'. The Minnesota Twin Study of 1990 was conducted by Bouchard to investigate if genetics and

Nature Vs. Nurture : Nature Versus Nurture Essay
Nature versus Nurture
You got your dark brown hair from your father and you got your looks from your mother, but where did you get your excitement for sports and your
love for all animals? A person's physical characteristics lean more towards genes and heredity, but our genes are not mentioned as much when behavior
is the topic. This is how the nature versus nurture debate first began. Scientists who believe in the nature theory believe that people behave the way they
do due to heredity and genes. On the other hand, nurture scientists believes behavior is taught and influenced by the environment and the surrounding
people. Many say that behavior results from nature, while others believe in the opposite, the environment. Human development has been viewed as one
of the most highly controversial topics in the world of psychology today, and the debate of nature versus nurture is at the top of the discussion list.
Discussion
Nature There are two types of believers regarding human development: nativists and empiricists. Nativists are those who believe that specific skills or
abilities are "native" or engrained into the brain in the womb or at birth. Each person has their own unique genetic code that is specific to that
individual as a whole. Therefore, some people are born with a more superior genetic makeup than others (McLeod, 2007). Bowlby's theory of
attachment is an example of a strong nature position in psychology. His theory illustrates the bond between a mother and her

Nature vs. Nurture Throughout the history of human existence, there have always been questions that have plagued man for centuries. Some of these
questions are "what is the meaning of life" and "which came first, the chicken or the egg". Within the past 400 years a new question has surfaced
which takes our minds to much further levels. The question asked is whether nature or nurture has more of an impact on the growing development of
people. It is a fact that a combination of nature and nurture play important roles in how humans behave socially. However, I believe that nature has a
more domineering role in the development of how people behave in society with regards to sexual orientation, crimes and violence and mental disorders.
...show more content...
Even the famous psychologist Sigmund Freud believed that sexual orientation was derived from nurture. Freud developed a theory which
explains that at birth till the age of four every child is bisexual. When the child reaches the age of around four, he/she begins to learn to withhold
their feeling for members of the same sex and start expressing those sexual feeling to members of the opposite sex. Freud proposed the idea that
male homosexuality originates when this crucial developmental stage is hindered by some outside force also known as nurture. According to Freud,
this can occur when either a chided is raised in a fatherless household or with a domineering mother figure. However, when this idea was actually
tested, it did not fall through as many would expect it would (Steen 185). Since many years after Freud's passing, it has become apparent that nature
holds a strong role in the development of sexual orientation of humans. If nurture isn't the cause for sexual orientation then nature must be. According
to Grant Steen, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, a large study was recently conducted which gathered gay males who have
either identical or fraternal twins or adopted brothers. The goal of the study would be to see if genetics played a role in twins. At the end of the
survey more than half of the identical twins of gay men were also found to me homosexuals. At the same time only about 22% of the fraternal twins
were found to

Essay on Nature vs Nurture Debate
Nature vs Nurture Debate
Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence behavior and development. In this issue nature can be
defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the individuals'
growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is
from, parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.
Throughout my childhood, I didn't grow up free of environmental influences nor did I develop without being affected by my inherited genetic makeup.
I think...show more content...
In reading stories about identical twins my point of view is easily understood. Various types of psychologist have analyzed the study of identical twins.
It shows that individuals with the same genetic make–up can be totally different, when it comes to personality. Nurture promotes the twins to grow up
as separate individuals. Its a lot better if a twin has his or her own personality rather than the same exact personality of the other half. I think this great
debate weighs heavier on the nurture side. As a child my parents, and sibling overshadowed my genetic make–up. No matter how much I thought my
physical traits made me behave. It did not affect me more than the things that I had seen and been exposed to. The more things that I had seen around
and experienced made me the person that I am today. If my genetic make–up was totally different, to a certain extent, I am sure that I?d behave the
same way that I do presently. There are exceptions to that. For instance if I were six foot five and one hundred and ninety pounds, I?d most likely
be in the NBA and be really rich. I think if I was really rich and in the NBA I wouldn?t have the same worries that I have today. Even if before I were
in the NBA I would have lots of attention and have a lot more confidence. So to an extent I would change a little if my genetic make–up were different.
In a sense, genetic make–up is just a competitor to the environmental factors

Different personality traits make us who we are today. There are many factors to our personalities and each aspect illustrates a bigger picture of
who we are and how we came to be. Openness to experience is a factor of the Five Factor Model (FFM) that describes my personality and is an
essential part of who I am in this society. Openness utilizes active imagination, attentiveness to inner feelings, intellectual curiosity, interest in variety,
and interest in aesthetics. It is used to display a general appreciation for creative ideas, imaginations, and the arts. Due to a sufficient amount of
psychometric research, it is valid to say that openness is viewed as a global personality trait that is comprised of a set of specific habits,...show more
content...
Although, they were traditionally Korean in the sense that they craved discipline and enforced good morals on me, they were also understanding of
the imaginative world. Also, my parents are true believers of being open to all types of art. However, not only are they true believers of this
openness, it is apparent that is in them that they are open to experience. Ever since I was five, I have played the cello. This driving force behind the
pursuit of music stems from my parents' broad outlook on the arts and their thoughts on how important it is to learn about the arts. These evidences
display that openness to experience carries a genetic component. Not only in my immediate family is it apparent that there is a genetic component to
openness to experience, but in my extended family it is evident as well. Another prime example of the "nature" quality of openness is illustrated
through my twin cousins. I have twin cousins, who were raised in drastically different environments. However despite the different environments,
both of my cousins have the same FMM trait: openness to experience. One of the twins named Yuri was sent to boarding school in America at an
early age while my other twin cousin Nari stayed in Korea. Yuri was raised by my aunt and uncle in New York City and lived a very liberal and
non–traditionally Korean lifestyle. On the other hand, Nari remained in Korea and was raised in a very culturally

Nature Vs Nurture Essay
The old question about nature versus nurture has made a lot of different opinions in the world. Some people think that everything that they are, is
because genetic. However, other persons think that the environment makes who they are. In my opinion nature and nurture make people's life different,
depending what factor people take to develop the differences between nature and nurture, it can explain if all human behavior are learned or is part of
it inherited. Nurture is defined by the society and environment people live in. Most people take their personality or talents from the place where they
use to be. The environment influences people's life. The society can see how the personality of a person is by knowing who are the people around
This research gives a good explanation about how the different environments change the personality of the twins. They have the same genes but
their personalities have changed in a big way. Besides, the author describes the two twins. ABC claims that "Lily has no siblings; Gillian has two.
Lily's family is Presbyterian; Gillian's is Catholic. Lily's neighborhood is ethnically mixed; Gillian's is not. Lily's family celebrates some Chinese
holidays and plans on sending her to Chinese educational classes; Gillian's family does not, instead wanting her to become part of Canadian culture"
(ABC NEW). The twins' environment is totally different. It makes that their personality, way to talk, and express show as they weren't twins. Nurture
is described by the environment that people live in. Depending the place where a person is, can affect or benefit him. Nature emphasizes in how
people acquire things by genetic, hereditary tendencies and biological factors. Some people use to copy or obtain different characteristics from their
family. In many families, people make hereditary tendencies to the next generations year by year. In addition, children acquire many things from their
parents. Such as, gender, psychological disorders, eye color, hair, lips, dimples, curled toes, eating habits, and stress. The web site ThoughtCo provides
a briefly explanation of nature using homosexuality as support. Crossman claims that "Homosexuality is considered a genetic result rather than a

Nature Vs Nurture Essay
Nature vs. Nurture It is a matter of concern whether human behaviors and characteristics are determined by nature or nurture. If a person's behavior is
inherited directly from the genes of his/her parents or other biological factors, then it is the nature that determines his character. But if the environment
that a person grew up in, affects his behavior, then it is the nurture that determines his/her character. It became a great matter of controversy among
scientists, psychologists and sociologists. Previously, many people believed that human behavior was instinctive. It can neither be taught nor learned.
But later some psychologists came to the conclusion that human behavior is learned throughout the lifetime which is not instinctive....show more
content...
This may not be because of particularly being a black man, but because of the culture he has adopted since his childhood. Here he somehow takes the
side of nurture. Many black people are assumed to be criminals. People judge them just by their appearance and the impression black people have
made in today's world. But this does not always mean that every black people are criminals and it's their biological factor that makes them do
crimes. We can take the example of Brent Staple. Even though he was an educated and good person, many people and especially white women fear
of him. But he was neither an uneducated person nor a criminal. He was brought up in a good family and properly nurtured by his parents. Therefore,
nurturing became the factor for his behavior. Similarly, there are examples given by another author Amy Cunningham in her essay, "Why Women
Smile". Although she focuses primarily on a smile, she tends to explain the actual cause of one's behavior. She explains that a smile or particularly a
women's smile comes from both natural happiness as well as the hope of people living around them, "The behavior seems to be an equal blend of
nature and nurture" (Cunningham 190). She further explains that both a normal baby and a blind baby smiles, although it may take a little longer for
the blind one. It means that the smiles are natural and should not be taught in all cases. However, there are situations where

Essay on Nurture versus Nature
Nurture versus Nature
The human brain is a portion of the central nervous system and serves as the control center for movement, sleep, hunger, and virtually everything else
vital and necessary to survive. Not only that, but the brain also controls all human emotions from fear and love, to elation and sorrow. It also receives
and interprets countless signals from other parts of the body and the outside environment. Summarily, the brain makes us conscious, emotional, and
intelligent. It's no wonder that with everything going on in the brain, so much emphasis is placed on its development. We now know, from scientific
research, that the brain grows at a rapid rate within the first years of an infant's life. With this information in mind,...show more content...
The structure of the brain is delicate, especially during the maturation years of development. If the brain is traumatized in any such way within the first
years of childhood, those traumatic events will shape the brain as it would have they been jovial ones. These events change the structure of the brain in
numerous ways. Though these changes are internal, they have a tremendous outcome on behavior as well. "Trauma elevates stress hormones, such as
cortisol, that wash over the tender brain like acid, as a result, regions in the cortex and in the limbic system are 20 to 30 percent smaller in abused
children than in normal kids." (Begley, p.20) This 20 to 30 percent difference generates enough anxiety to induce spouts of stress hormones at the
slightest thought or reminiscence of a previous traumatic situation. This kind of reaction often causes problems with attention, concentration, and
impulsive behavior. The ability to learn can also be altered via early childhood trauma. It is from this trauma that neurotransmitters, "that play a key
role in telling growing neurons where to go and what to connect to" (Begley, p.32), are matted and cause insufficiency in learning capabilities.
"Only in rare cases of extreme isolation is it possible to observe concretely separated two factors in the development of human personality which are
always otherwise only analytically separated, the biogenic and the

Nature vs Nurture
For the past five weeks we have studied three different but influential people in our perspective on human nature class. They are Freud, Plato and Tzu.
The main discussion between all of them is nature versus nurture. I will discuss the difference between nature and nurture and then I'll apply to each of
these philosophers and how they react to it.
When looked up in the dictionary the term nature means the universe and its phenomena or one's own character and temperament. When discussed with
these philosophers it is meant as one's own character revolved around the universe for which they live in, basically they're surroundings. At the same
time when I looked up the word nurture it said the upbringing,...show more content...
Not because we were taught those things but for the fact that they are instincts embedded in our minds for survival. For nurture the psychosexual
development is due majorly because of nurture. From oral to anal–retentive these are all due to expressive characteristics that are given or raised from
birth. The one that has the most effect is the structural model. Reasons for me stating this is because the id is the primitive part of the mind that is
basically a natural instinct. At the same time the ego is also because of natural instinct simply because of the reality principle. Freud even went as far
as stating, "..adults ego–feeling can't have been the same from beginning. It must have gone through a process of development"(13). The part where it
changes is the superego, which is the only form of nurture in the psychoanalytic perspective, which is because the superego only developed because
the child began to incorporate parental values and also operates according to the raising and discipline of the parents.
Now if you look at Plato's point of view Plato supports nurture more than nature. The only points that Plato made that would seem to support nature is
the point he made for example is when he talks about female guards. The reason for this is also because he feels that women should be given lighter

Nurture vs. Nature Essay
Nature v. Nurture: Child rearing debate Inter–American University of Puerto Rico Alejandra Fraguada GEHS 3030–4705 Human Formation in a
Contemporary Society Prof. Jahiatt Garcia M. Trimester Late Feb. – May 2013 Is our personality based on how, where, and who raised us or who are
parents or "genes" are? Well that is one thing that people and researchers have been debating over, or so the video says, but really how are we to
know if it is between the 'nature' or 'nurture' of how and what we grow up to be. In order to find out, I guess we would have to have some type of
clinical, or study, to be able to figure it out. But wait if it all depends on "genes" does it mean that it doesn't depend on 'nurture' or 'nature' but merely on
I know that I am shy, but yet I am loud, outgoing and many other things when I am surrounded by people I know. When meeting new people I
force myself to not let my shyness get in the way, for one, it isn't good to be shy and in a little corner, and also people seem to think that you are
been a stuck up and think you are better than them, even though that isn't what I or anybody is trying to be. The video says, if we are raised in, um
I don't know, let's say an island for the heck of it, we grow up to be "surfers" and "partiers", and like to "tan" and be either at the pool or beach all
the time. True, Ok, I can't lie maybe they might be SOME of those things but not ALL of it. I have friends and know people (family) who were
raised their entire life on an island, and yet not all are "surfers", "partiers" or "tan" freaks who go to the beach or pool all they time. They found
other things to do either for wheeling, hiking, scuba diving, amongst many other things. And I have and know other friends and people, including
myself, who grew up in a place where you could only go to the beach and pool and do half of the other things in summer time and it would take
hours to get to the place to be able to do those things, and they are way more the "surfer" types and "partiers". I am not saying that I am one of those
who surf, because I don't even know how to surf, but I do like to party and have fun and I would do hiking and other things that my

Nature Vs Nurture
In the world of psychology, nature and nurture have great meanings as to how it affects an individual. It is argued on which one affects someone's
personality, behavior traits, and thought process the most. Nature is somebody's genes, physical traits, and biology and nurture is how someone
was raised and how they live including their family, their culture, and the environment in which they are surrounded with. I agree that both nature
and nurture have a great impact on many things in a person's life. I know that in my own personal life I have been impacted by both in particular
ways. I do know that genes play a part in my personality and thought process in small ways however, I believe that I am more affected by
environmental factors. My reason for that conclusion is because, if I were to examine both my father and mother's personality, behavior, and
thought process, I would find that my own traits are different in vast ways. It might be argued that I am a good mixture of both but, I just do not see
this to be true. I move, think, and act at my own pace and in my own ways that are very different from either my mother or my father. If I were to
even go back one more generation, I would still see the many differences between my mother and her parents or my father and his parents....show more
content...
For example, in some cultures, children are expected to start working and doing tasks at a younger age than in other cultures and it influences their
thought process and behavior as well as their personality and ambitions. In my own personal life I have grown up in a culture where technology is
very involved in everyday life. I first had access to the internet from age twelve and have had access ever since. I have become almost dependant on
using it for everyday things. The world that I am growing up in is a technological one and it is greatly different from the world ten, twenty, or even
thirty years

Nature Vs. Nurture Essay
Nature vs. Nurture Essay Throughout many years, scientists have been debating about whether nature or nurture is the driving force that shapes a
person's cognitive abilities and personal traits. Before the ongoing debate can be explained, it is necessary to understand what nature and nurture
actually are. Nature is loosely defined as the genetics one inherits and tendencies that influence development. Many things in an individual are
hereditary, for instance; gender, disease, height, eye color, natural talent for an activity, and many more. Nurture can be defined as various
environmental factors that a person is exposed to, which can influence how a person develops. Nurture affects an individual's growth through multiple
ways such as: stressors, activities, intellect and experiences, physically, emotionally, and socially through peers. Progressively, many are realizing that
asking to what extent environment or genetics influence a person's traits is not necessarily the correct way to approach the debate. In all actuality there
is not an easy way to sort through the multiple forces that exist in these situations. However, numerous researchers are now looking at how the two
factors intertwine and influence one another because only one of them could not simply exist alone without the other very well. Nature and nurture
coexist and work together to help shape a person, whether that is from the two working equally or one being slightly more predominant over the other,
however

Summary Of Nature Vs Nurture

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Summary Of Nature Vs Nurture