SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
H4 Angelica Du, Jiatao Liang, Connor Thompson
7/22/14
SAAST Biotechnology
Simulating Gut Biofilm In Vitro
Abstract
A biofilm is an aggregate of microorganisms attached to a biotic or abiotic surface. One of the
most important biofilms people encounter is that within our gut, which aids in digestion, immune
response, and food regulation. In vitro biofilms are produced currently via technology such as a
drip flow biofilm fermenter. However, the drip flow model is limited in its ability to represent a
true biofilm because it can only grow one type of bacteria, due to the “winner takes all”
phenomenon. The “winner takes all” phenomenon is when one species of bacteria shows a
greater affinity for the given nutrients, causing the other species to starve and die-out. The goal
of our research proposal is to overcome the “winner takes all” phenomenon by creating a gut
biofilm in vitro, capable of supporting the coexistence of multiple species of bacteria. To
accomplish this, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium will be 3d printed separately onto a porous,
mucin-based membrane. The membrane limits the mobility of the bacteria, while still allowing
them to quorum sense, the process by which bacteria communicate with one another via
chemical sensing which aids in the growth and health of the biofilm. Our device will consist of
two layers separated by a porous membrane, through which chemicals, food, and waste can be
diffused. The bacteria will be engineered with green fluorescent protein so that we can identify
colonies and analyze bacterial growth under a UV light. Since the device will preserve the
chemical interconnectivity of the bacteria, we expect to see an increase in the number of
colonies, which will indicate a successful biofilm, capable of sustaining multi-species bacteria
growth. Later on, this model can be used to observe the reaction of the human gut bacteria to
various drugs and treatments without resorting to risky, costly human testing. Ultimately, this
model can serve as a platform for future testing of probiotics and further study on the mechanics
of the human GIT.
Introduction
A biofilm is an aggregate of microorganisms attached to a biotic or abiotic surface. One
of the most important places biofilms are found is within the human gut, or gastrointestinal tract
(GIT), which functions as a complex ecosystem harboring a group of coexisting microbial
populations living in synergy and eubiosis1. This ecosystem aids its host with digestion, immune
response, and food regulation. Also, modern diseases such as obesity and diabetes have show
strong links to the composition of the gut flora.2 The dynamics of gut flora are crucial to
maintaining a healthy body, aiding in the protection against invasive pathogens and harmful
chemical compounds.
The gut lining secretes a mucin layer about 400 micrometers thick along the intestinal
walls3, which regulates the movement of the bacteria and provides the foundation for biofilm
1
Holzapfel, Wilhelm and Haberer, Petra, et al. “Overview of Gut Flora and Probiotics.” International Journal of
Food Microbiology, Volume 41, 85-10, 1998.
2
Kotzampassi, Katerina, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, and George Stavrou. "Obesity as a Consequence of
Gut Bacteria and Diet Interaction."ISRN Obesity 2014 (2014): n. pag. Web.
3
Matsumoto,Mitsuharu and Tani, Hisanori, et al. “Adhesive Property of Bifidobacterium lactis LKM512 and
Predominant Bacteria of Intestinal Microflora to Human Intestinal Mucin,” Current Microbiology, Volume 44, 212-
215, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-001-0087-4.
growth4. The ability of the gut flora to coexist relies heavily on quorum sensing, which is
bacterial communication through chemical signaling5. Quorum sensing is essential in the growth
of the biofilm as a whole, allowing the bacteria to exist in eubiosis, the balance between the
beneficial and the harmful bacteria.
Communication between the multiple species is imperative, for they exist within a very
hostile environment and must rely on each other for mutual survival. Characteristics of the GIT
include a pH range of 2.5-3.5 and the secretion of aggressive intestinal fluids. The amount of
nutrients fluctuates with the individual’s diet, which places a lot of stress on the bioflora as a
whole. However, the interactions between separate bacteria, as well as with their environment,
make them more robust and resistant to calamity.
Statement of Need
The unique environment of the gut is hard to replicate in laboratory-grown multi-species
cultures. One dominant species of bacteria is often more equipped for the given environment,
creating a lopsided competition and pushing out the other species6. This is known as the “winner
takes all” phenomenon and is the crux of the issue with in vitro biofilm. Because of this, attempts
to study biofilm have been mainly concerned with single species studies, which cannot give an
accurate representation of the entire gut biofilm.
A model of the gut biofilm in vitro will allow scientists to systematically study the
bacterial interactions that are key to comprehending our digestive system. Previous methods for
constructing laboratory biofilm include using a drip flow biofilm reactor (Figure 1), in which a
thin film of bacteria is maintained by a steady drip of nutrients flowing over the slide of biofilm
with waste elimination on the other side. However, this device is limited in its ability to study
bacterial interactions of a biofilm, because it focuses on a single type of immobile bacteria with
limited potential for growth. Replication of the gut requires multiple species of bacteria, along
with specific conditions concerning the pH, temperature, and flow of nutrients.
Objectives
There are many variables concerning the homeostasis of the gut biofilm, including
individual dietary factors and unattainable bacterial diversity that makes the gut difficult to
exactly replicate in all its complexity. To overcome the “winner takes all” phenomenon, we seek
to make our own device consisting of multiple species of bacteria, with specific environmental
conditions that mimic that of the gut. For our own model, we will focus primarily on the chemical
communication that occurs between the bacteria, the most significant factor for the success of the
gut ecosystem. We hypothesize that an environment mimicking that of our gut will be the most
successful in growing a stable biofilm.
4
Holzapfel, 86.
5
Hooper, Lora and Gordon, Jeffrey. “Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut.” Science Magazine,
Volume 292, 2001.
6
Kim HJ, Boedicker JQ, Choi JW, Ismagilov RF. “Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies
bacterial community.” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18 188–18 193. 2008.
Figure 1: Drip Flow Biofilm Reactor. The biofilm is grown on the
substratum, while food is entered through the inlet and waste is
eliminated through the effluent outlet. Source: (Coenye, Tom and
Hans Nelis, “In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial
biofilm formation,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, Volume
83, 89-105,2010. )
Approach
I. The Device
To overcome this challenge,
we plan to incorporate some of the
known techniques in biotechnology,
specifically the drip flow biofilm
reactor (Figure 1) and 3D printing
(Figure 2), into our own biofilm
model. However, we can build upon
them to represent the dynamics of a
gut biofilm, including multiple
species of bacteria, an efficient
nutrient delivery and waste removal
system, and a way to arrange the
bacteria for optimal living
conditions. After building our device,
our goal is to sustain the survival of
the different bacteria species for as
long as possible by experimenting
with dynamic conditions and
discovering the combination that will optimize the bacteria lifetime length.
The spatial arrangement of the bacteria in the biofilm plays an important role in their
social behavior in terms of reproduction and mobility in a cooperative relationship. Using a
recent microscopic 3D printing method (Figure 2), we will construct a bacterial community that
allows for the organization of multiple populations of bacteria in a geometric arrangement with
each colony 200 micrometers apart. This separates the two bacterial species just enough to avoid
competition for nutrients, while still allowing them to communicate using quorum sensing
signals.7 This is important for it allows for the cooperation between species that exists within the
gut to be replicated, while avoiding the “winner takes all” phenomenon that exists in previous in
vitro models. In this manner, we can arrange the bacteria in adjacent or nested colonies, held in
place by a highly porous, cross-linked gelatin material, to mimic the biofilm structure of the gut.
In this shared
microenvironment,
the bacteria will be
suspended within
the set gel while
still being able to
communicate with
each other through
the porous
material. While
this departs from
an exact model of
7
Connel, Jodi et al. “3D Printing of Microscopic Bacterial Communities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America. Vol. 110, 2013, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309729110.
Figure 2: These are the steps taken to create the enclosed cell structure in our biofilm
reactor.(Source: Connel5
)
the gut biofilm, it preserves the chemical interconnectivity between the bacteria, an important
factor for biofilm formation through bacteria working in harmony 8.
The two bacterial species we will choose are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (Figure
4). Both strains have been studied in-depth by scientists for their presence in the gut and
probiotic properties. We will engineer the bacteria with strains of pGLO, which will give us an
easy indicator of the colony size, number, and growth.
To print the bacteria onto the porous surface, we will mix the Lactobacillus and
Bifidobacterium with a fabrication precursor containing mucin instead of gelatin to better
emulate the gut. This cellular suspension will be moved to a sterile well to be cooled, resulting in
a gelled matrix. The geometric configurations are fabricated around one or more bacteria by
scanning a highly focused pulsed laser beam in three dimensions. We will design a computer
model of the bacterial colonies’ spatial orientations of the 200 microns distances between each
colony forming unit, and the technology will follow this plan with sub-micrometer 3D
resolution, creating an artificial biofilm that will mimic the gut on a small-scale.
In order to preserve the realistic conditions of the gut, we will control the pH level and
temperature to mirror that of the human body’s. Our gut (Figure 3) will be molded using
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). PDMS is a commonly used silicon-based polymer that is clear,
non-toxic, and resistant to strong acids and bases9. This is ideal because even though this portion
of the model will not come in contact with bacteria directly, it needs to be able to withstand
strong acid that simulates the fluid in the gut.
The mold has two levels: an upper, cylindrical area where the bacteria and the mucin
layer are, and a lower cavity that allows for the flow of simple sugars, yeast extract, and proteins
as nutrients for the growing bacteria. On top of the half-pipe will be a coverslip, through which
we can observe the growth of the
biofilm.
The structure resembles a
half pipe to simulate the tubes of
the small intestine, specifically the
duodenum, and to eliminate
corners in which bacteria can
aggregate. The mucin layer and
the cavity will be exposed to one
another through the pores, through
which nutrients, as well as control
factors such as acids and bases,
can diffuse upwards to the
bacteria. The bacteria
continuously communicate via
quorum sensing by sending
chemical messages through the
pores (Figure 3).
8
Kim HJ, Boedicker JQ, Choi JW, Ismagilov RF. “Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies
bacterial community.” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18 188–18 193. 2008.
9
Lotters, J. C, "The mechanical properties of the rubber elastic polymer polydimethylsiloxane for sensor
applications" Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 147-153. 2007
Figure 3: Our model of the gut. It will have a ultraviolet light on the
top to reveal the glow of the recombinant bacteria, a porous layer
that allows the bacteria to communicate with each other, and a
cavity through which food, mucin, and waste can flow through and
diffuse either way.
II. Experiments
We will overcome the
“winner takes all” phenomenon by
both limiting mobility via the
mucin layer and forcing the
bacteria to rely on each other by
imposing harsh conditions in
which no single species of bacteria
can survive alone. We will exploit
the fact that bacteria in biofilm
have greater resistance to harsher
conditions than planktonic
bacteria. By mirroring such
conditions like those in the gut, we
expose the bacteria to the same
unsympathetic environment that they are used to surviving and thriving in by working in
harmony with the bacteria group.
The bacteria will be used to assess the effectiveness of our in vitro biofilm model in
mimicking these conditions of the gut. Colony growth will be measured by counting the
fluorescent colonies of pGLO modified bacteria with the UV light built into our device (Figure
3). An increase in the amount of colonies of both the Lactobacillus and the Bifidobacteria will
indicate a successful biofilm, capable of housing and accommodating growth.
Our hypothesis states that the optimal conditions for culturing the bacteria are those that
mimic the harsh habitat of the gut to the closest extent. Once our biofilm model is tested
successfully for growing multi-species ecosystems, we want to test this hypothesis by changing
various environmental factors and observing the colony in response to each adjustment. We can
experiment by increasing and decreasing specific variables to observe how the bacteria act as in
response. For each experiment, the bacteria will be counted using the same GFP method, so that
we can discover the optimal conditions and evaluate our hypothesis accordingly.
First, the pH of the system can be adjusted using the bottom cavity, which we will use as
our primary control system. High concentrations of hydrochloric acid (HCl) will flow in the
lower cavity and diffuse upwards to the bacteria, lowering the pH. If the solution becomes too
acidic, we can flow a basic solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to neutralize some of the acid.
We will experiment with various ranges of pH and observe the degree to which the bacteria are
able to survive under certain chemical circumstances. The ideal pH is known to be between 2.5
and 3.5. Thus, we will start at 3.5, record the growth, and gradually lower it. This will reveal the
optimal pH for the growth of both Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus.
We will maintain a constant external temperature of 37°C, the average temperature of the
human gut, to ensure the accurate replication of the gut environment with the first few trials.
Similarly to the pH modification, we can adjust the temperature in the biofilm to see how the
bacteria react to the change in a favorable or unfavorable manner. For example, under cold
temperatures, we expect to see that the bacteria will grow very slowly due to slower rate of
molecular motion and biological reaction10. We will first change the temperature up and down by
increments 5°C order to observe the effects and possible growth trends.
10
Erdal, Ufuk G. and Randall, Clifford W. “Thermal Adaptation of Bacteria to Cold Temperatures in an EBPR
System.” Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
Figure 4: Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Each as applications in
probiotics and are found in a human gut Source: (Weiner, Melinda. "A
Cultured Response to HIV." Nature Medicine. Nature, 2009.Web. 17 July
2014,Holm, Carl. "Scientists Unravel Probiotics Gut Defence › News in
Science (ABC Science)." ABC Science. ABC, 27 Jan. 2011.Web. 17 July
2014.)
Lastly, we will conduct an experiment with increasing and decreasing amount of
nutrients provided so we can see whether competition over these nutrients arises. We plan to
flow simple sugars, which are easiest to break down in the digestive system. Using the UV light
to observe the growth of colonies, we will be able to determine the optimal amount of nutrients
to provide our bacteria to ensure a prolonged period of growth. If one grows quicker than the
other, it would show one species dominating the other. To avoid this scenario, we will adjust the
kind of nutrients we provide the bacteria, preventing the “winner takes all” phenomenon to
occurring, ensuring our bionic gut’s success.
Ultimately, we will find the best combination of all of these factors to see whether they
line up with the conditions of the gut, therefore verifying our original hypothesis.
Significance
We present this model as a proof of concept. The actual human gut has a myriad of
factors that our current model does not take into account: for instance, salt balance and the
thousands of other bacteria we must include. If this method of cultivating gut flora on a
microscale with only two different strains of bacteria works, we can expand it to encompass
more different strains of bacteria, eventually culminating to the cultivation of the entire
microbiota of the gut, as well as the more complex systems of the gut.
When completed, pharmaceutical companies can use our model to test the effects of
drugs on gut biota, without resorting to human subjects that can be both expensive and risky.
Moreover, doctors can use the model for individualized diagnosis. The gut of a single patient can
be replicated in vitro by adjusting the model to their specific pH and bacterial-composition.
Testing drugs and treatments on the bionic gut allows the doctor to observe whether or not their
treatment kills gut biota, prompting them to adjust their dosages accordingly, avoiding
ineffective treatment and patient injury. Additionally, an in vitro model of the gut will allow us
to study bacteria that have never been cultured before because of their interdependence on others
in the gut flora11. We will eventually be able to culture those bacteria outside of a living person
and systematically study all of the bacteria of the gut.
10
State University, 2002.
11
Flint, Harry J., Paul W. O'Toole, and Alan W. Walker. "The Human Intestinal Microbiota." Microbiology 156
(2010): 3203-204. Web.

More Related Content

What's hot

Use of Probiotics in the NICU
Use of Probiotics in the NICUUse of Probiotics in the NICU
Use of Probiotics in the NICUProlacta
 
Probiotics and Prebiotics
Probiotics and PrebioticsProbiotics and Prebiotics
Probiotics and Prebioticsmontica sawant
 
An overview of gut microbiota
An overview of gut microbiota An overview of gut microbiota
An overview of gut microbiota Asma AlQahtani
 
Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4
Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4
Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4neerjayakult
 
Beyong probiotic and prebiotic a synbiotic health supplement
Beyong probiotic and prebiotic   a synbiotic health supplementBeyong probiotic and prebiotic   a synbiotic health supplement
Beyong probiotic and prebiotic a synbiotic health supplementpoussfl
 
Pre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-Deeb
Pre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-DeebPre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-Deeb
Pre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-DeebDalia Deeb
 
Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...
Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...
Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...IFSMED
 
Decreasing urea and creatinine in ckd
Decreasing urea and creatinine in ckdDecreasing urea and creatinine in ckd
Decreasing urea and creatinine in ckdALAA AWN
 
Probiotics..Dr. keya
Probiotics..Dr. keyaProbiotics..Dr. keya
Probiotics..Dr. keyasumona keya
 
Gut microbiota in health and disease
Gut microbiota in health and disease  Gut microbiota in health and disease
Gut microbiota in health and disease Monkez M Yousif
 
Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016
Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016
Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016Sofia Zois
 
Microbial ecology of gut symbiotic systems
Microbial ecology of gut symbiotic systemsMicrobial ecology of gut symbiotic systems
Microbial ecology of gut symbiotic systemsDr. sreeremya S
 

What's hot (20)

Probiotics
ProbioticsProbiotics
Probiotics
 
Gut flora & probiotic 11
Gut flora & probiotic 11Gut flora & probiotic 11
Gut flora & probiotic 11
 
Human probiotics
Human probioticsHuman probiotics
Human probiotics
 
Use of Probiotics in the NICU
Use of Probiotics in the NICUUse of Probiotics in the NICU
Use of Probiotics in the NICU
 
Probiotics and Prebiotics
Probiotics and PrebioticsProbiotics and Prebiotics
Probiotics and Prebiotics
 
An overview of gut microbiota
An overview of gut microbiota An overview of gut microbiota
An overview of gut microbiota
 
Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4
Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4
Dr. mohan microbiota chennai dec 4
 
Beyong probiotic and prebiotic a synbiotic health supplement
Beyong probiotic and prebiotic   a synbiotic health supplementBeyong probiotic and prebiotic   a synbiotic health supplement
Beyong probiotic and prebiotic a synbiotic health supplement
 
Pre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-Deeb
Pre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-DeebPre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-Deeb
Pre and probiotics in colorectal cancer Prevention By Dalia Khamis El-Deeb
 
Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...
Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...
Ankylosing Spondylitis the gut and the bugs: an integrative approach to treat...
 
Decreasing urea and creatinine in ckd
Decreasing urea and creatinine in ckdDecreasing urea and creatinine in ckd
Decreasing urea and creatinine in ckd
 
Probiotics 2016
Probiotics 2016Probiotics 2016
Probiotics 2016
 
Probiotics..Dr. keya
Probiotics..Dr. keyaProbiotics..Dr. keya
Probiotics..Dr. keya
 
Gut flora and health
Gut flora and healthGut flora and health
Gut flora and health
 
Gut microbiota in health and disease
Gut microbiota in health and disease  Gut microbiota in health and disease
Gut microbiota in health and disease
 
PROBIOTICS AND ITS ROLE IN HUMAN HEALTH AND NUTRITION-Jogvan Houmann
PROBIOTICS AND ITS ROLE IN HUMAN HEALTH AND NUTRITION-Jogvan HoumannPROBIOTICS AND ITS ROLE IN HUMAN HEALTH AND NUTRITION-Jogvan Houmann
PROBIOTICS AND ITS ROLE IN HUMAN HEALTH AND NUTRITION-Jogvan Houmann
 
Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016
Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016
Pre and Probiotics Final Spring 2016
 
Gut Flora
Gut FloraGut Flora
Gut Flora
 
Microbial ecology of gut symbiotic systems
Microbial ecology of gut symbiotic systemsMicrobial ecology of gut symbiotic systems
Microbial ecology of gut symbiotic systems
 
Probiotic
ProbioticProbiotic
Probiotic
 

Viewers also liked

I'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel Well
I'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel WellI'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel Well
I'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel WellIFSMED
 
Fivelac probiotic
Fivelac probioticFivelac probiotic
Fivelac probioticRaga C
 
PTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI Lecture
PTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI LecturePTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI Lecture
PTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI Lecturemarlicz
 
What is Biogaia Probiotic
What is Biogaia ProbioticWhat is Biogaia Probiotic
What is Biogaia ProbioticRaga C
 
A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...
A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...
A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...DVS BioLife Ltd
 
Kenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion disease
Kenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion diseaseKenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion disease
Kenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion diseaseguest478151
 
Probiotics.farhat
Probiotics.farhatProbiotics.farhat
Probiotics.farhatDema Moheb
 
Dannon Probiotic yogurt
Dannon Probiotic yogurtDannon Probiotic yogurt
Dannon Probiotic yogurtRaga C
 
Lepidopteran gut microflora
Lepidopteran gut microfloraLepidopteran gut microflora
Lepidopteran gut microfloraGadad H S
 
Cottage Cheese Probiotic
Cottage Cheese ProbioticCottage Cheese Probiotic
Cottage Cheese ProbioticRaga C
 
Good Belly Probiotic
Good Belly ProbioticGood Belly Probiotic
Good Belly ProbioticRaga C
 
Developing a gut health solution requires a new holistic approach
Developing a gut health solution requires a new holistic approachDeveloping a gut health solution requires a new holistic approach
Developing a gut health solution requires a new holistic approachDSM Animal Nutrition & Health
 
How to choose a probiotic
How to choose a probioticHow to choose a probiotic
How to choose a probioticRaga C
 

Viewers also liked (17)

I'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel Well
I'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel WellI'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel Well
I'm Gluten Free and Still Don't Feel Well
 
Fivelac probiotic
Fivelac probioticFivelac probiotic
Fivelac probiotic
 
PTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI Lecture
PTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI LecturePTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI Lecture
PTG-E Congress 2008 Microbe Hunters GI Lecture
 
What is Biogaia Probiotic
What is Biogaia ProbioticWhat is Biogaia Probiotic
What is Biogaia Probiotic
 
A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...
A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...
A review on the Role of Beneficial microorganisms and Prebiotics in Human Nut...
 
Kenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion disease
Kenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion diseaseKenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion disease
Kenny De Meirleir : ME/CFS, hydrogen sulfide and aberrant prion disease
 
Probiotics.farhat
Probiotics.farhatProbiotics.farhat
Probiotics.farhat
 
Dannon Probiotic yogurt
Dannon Probiotic yogurtDannon Probiotic yogurt
Dannon Probiotic yogurt
 
Lepidopteran gut microflora
Lepidopteran gut microfloraLepidopteran gut microflora
Lepidopteran gut microflora
 
Cottage Cheese Probiotic
Cottage Cheese ProbioticCottage Cheese Probiotic
Cottage Cheese Probiotic
 
Good Belly Probiotic
Good Belly ProbioticGood Belly Probiotic
Good Belly Probiotic
 
Probiotics
ProbioticsProbiotics
Probiotics
 
Probiotics
Probiotics Probiotics
Probiotics
 
Microbes for Mental Health
Microbes for Mental HealthMicrobes for Mental Health
Microbes for Mental Health
 
Developing a gut health solution requires a new holistic approach
Developing a gut health solution requires a new holistic approachDeveloping a gut health solution requires a new holistic approach
Developing a gut health solution requires a new holistic approach
 
Probiotics
ProbioticsProbiotics
Probiotics
 
How to choose a probiotic
How to choose a probioticHow to choose a probiotic
How to choose a probiotic
 

Similar to H4.paper4

Microbial biofilms pathogenicity and treatment strategies
Microbial biofilms  pathogenicity and treatment strategiesMicrobial biofilms  pathogenicity and treatment strategies
Microbial biofilms pathogenicity and treatment strategiesPratyush Kumar Das
 
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiologyThe gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiologyAlfonso Enrique Islas Rodríguez
 
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiologyThe gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiologyAlfonso Enrique Islas Rodríguez
 
2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...
2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...
2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...Daniel Chan
 
Esoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilm
Esoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilmEsoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilm
Esoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilmShruti Maroo
 
Neutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotics
Neutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & SynbioticsNeutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotics
Neutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & SynbioticsMayur D. Chauhan
 
neutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdf
neutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdfneutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdf
neutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdfsatbirkaur28
 
Ubiquity Of Bacteria
Ubiquity Of BacteriaUbiquity Of Bacteria
Ubiquity Of BacteriaLaura Benitez
 
Muyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & Prebiotics
Muyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & PrebioticsMuyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & Prebiotics
Muyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & PrebioticsMathew Rogers Muyinda
 
Probiotics in pediatric practice
Probiotics in pediatric practice Probiotics in pediatric practice
Probiotics in pediatric practice smsht ccl
 
Endo microbiology
Endo microbiologyEndo microbiology
Endo microbiologyDR POOJA
 
Microbiota intestinale e Patologie Neurodegenerative
Microbiota intestinale e Patologie NeurodegenerativeMicrobiota intestinale e Patologie Neurodegenerative
Microbiota intestinale e Patologie NeurodegenerativeASMaD
 
Biofilms
BiofilmsBiofilms
BiofilmsINawar
 
DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)
DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)
DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)Dr.Malvika Thakur
 
Which probiotic for acute diarrheea in children
Which probiotic for acute diarrheea in childrenWhich probiotic for acute diarrheea in children
Which probiotic for acute diarrheea in childrengfalakha
 

Similar to H4.paper4 (20)

Nature10213
Nature10213Nature10213
Nature10213
 
Microbial biofilms pathogenicity and treatment strategies
Microbial biofilms  pathogenicity and treatment strategiesMicrobial biofilms  pathogenicity and treatment strategies
Microbial biofilms pathogenicity and treatment strategies
 
BIOFILM FORMATION
BIOFILM FORMATIONBIOFILM FORMATION
BIOFILM FORMATION
 
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiologyThe gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
 
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiologyThe gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
The gut microbiota — masters of host development and physiology
 
2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...
2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...
2 (2011) the role of gut micriobiota and the mucosal barrier in the pathogene...
 
Esoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilm
Esoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilmEsoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilm
Esoteric communique amid microbes in an oral biofilm
 
Neutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotics
Neutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & SynbioticsNeutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotics
Neutraceuticals - Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotics
 
neutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdf
neutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdfneutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdf
neutraceuticals-151002080111-lva1-app6892.pdf
 
Ubiquity Of Bacteria
Ubiquity Of BacteriaUbiquity Of Bacteria
Ubiquity Of Bacteria
 
biofilm (2).pptx
biofilm (2).pptxbiofilm (2).pptx
biofilm (2).pptx
 
Muyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & Prebiotics
Muyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & PrebioticsMuyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & Prebiotics
Muyinda Mathew Rogers - Probiotics & Prebiotics
 
The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health
The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and healthThe role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health
The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health
 
Probiotics in pediatric practice
Probiotics in pediatric practice Probiotics in pediatric practice
Probiotics in pediatric practice
 
Endo microbiology
Endo microbiologyEndo microbiology
Endo microbiology
 
Microbiota intestinale e Patologie Neurodegenerative
Microbiota intestinale e Patologie NeurodegenerativeMicrobiota intestinale e Patologie Neurodegenerative
Microbiota intestinale e Patologie Neurodegenerative
 
Biofilms
BiofilmsBiofilms
Biofilms
 
BioFilms
BioFilmsBioFilms
BioFilms
 
DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)
DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)
DENTAL PLAQUE - PART 2 (BIOFILM)
 
Which probiotic for acute diarrheea in children
Which probiotic for acute diarrheea in childrenWhich probiotic for acute diarrheea in children
Which probiotic for acute diarrheea in children
 

H4.paper4

  • 1. H4 Angelica Du, Jiatao Liang, Connor Thompson 7/22/14 SAAST Biotechnology Simulating Gut Biofilm In Vitro Abstract A biofilm is an aggregate of microorganisms attached to a biotic or abiotic surface. One of the most important biofilms people encounter is that within our gut, which aids in digestion, immune response, and food regulation. In vitro biofilms are produced currently via technology such as a drip flow biofilm fermenter. However, the drip flow model is limited in its ability to represent a true biofilm because it can only grow one type of bacteria, due to the “winner takes all” phenomenon. The “winner takes all” phenomenon is when one species of bacteria shows a greater affinity for the given nutrients, causing the other species to starve and die-out. The goal of our research proposal is to overcome the “winner takes all” phenomenon by creating a gut biofilm in vitro, capable of supporting the coexistence of multiple species of bacteria. To accomplish this, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium will be 3d printed separately onto a porous, mucin-based membrane. The membrane limits the mobility of the bacteria, while still allowing them to quorum sense, the process by which bacteria communicate with one another via chemical sensing which aids in the growth and health of the biofilm. Our device will consist of two layers separated by a porous membrane, through which chemicals, food, and waste can be diffused. The bacteria will be engineered with green fluorescent protein so that we can identify colonies and analyze bacterial growth under a UV light. Since the device will preserve the chemical interconnectivity of the bacteria, we expect to see an increase in the number of colonies, which will indicate a successful biofilm, capable of sustaining multi-species bacteria growth. Later on, this model can be used to observe the reaction of the human gut bacteria to various drugs and treatments without resorting to risky, costly human testing. Ultimately, this model can serve as a platform for future testing of probiotics and further study on the mechanics of the human GIT. Introduction A biofilm is an aggregate of microorganisms attached to a biotic or abiotic surface. One of the most important places biofilms are found is within the human gut, or gastrointestinal tract (GIT), which functions as a complex ecosystem harboring a group of coexisting microbial populations living in synergy and eubiosis1. This ecosystem aids its host with digestion, immune response, and food regulation. Also, modern diseases such as obesity and diabetes have show strong links to the composition of the gut flora.2 The dynamics of gut flora are crucial to maintaining a healthy body, aiding in the protection against invasive pathogens and harmful chemical compounds. The gut lining secretes a mucin layer about 400 micrometers thick along the intestinal walls3, which regulates the movement of the bacteria and provides the foundation for biofilm 1 Holzapfel, Wilhelm and Haberer, Petra, et al. “Overview of Gut Flora and Probiotics.” International Journal of Food Microbiology, Volume 41, 85-10, 1998. 2 Kotzampassi, Katerina, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, and George Stavrou. "Obesity as a Consequence of Gut Bacteria and Diet Interaction."ISRN Obesity 2014 (2014): n. pag. Web. 3 Matsumoto,Mitsuharu and Tani, Hisanori, et al. “Adhesive Property of Bifidobacterium lactis LKM512 and Predominant Bacteria of Intestinal Microflora to Human Intestinal Mucin,” Current Microbiology, Volume 44, 212- 215, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-001-0087-4.
  • 2. growth4. The ability of the gut flora to coexist relies heavily on quorum sensing, which is bacterial communication through chemical signaling5. Quorum sensing is essential in the growth of the biofilm as a whole, allowing the bacteria to exist in eubiosis, the balance between the beneficial and the harmful bacteria. Communication between the multiple species is imperative, for they exist within a very hostile environment and must rely on each other for mutual survival. Characteristics of the GIT include a pH range of 2.5-3.5 and the secretion of aggressive intestinal fluids. The amount of nutrients fluctuates with the individual’s diet, which places a lot of stress on the bioflora as a whole. However, the interactions between separate bacteria, as well as with their environment, make them more robust and resistant to calamity. Statement of Need The unique environment of the gut is hard to replicate in laboratory-grown multi-species cultures. One dominant species of bacteria is often more equipped for the given environment, creating a lopsided competition and pushing out the other species6. This is known as the “winner takes all” phenomenon and is the crux of the issue with in vitro biofilm. Because of this, attempts to study biofilm have been mainly concerned with single species studies, which cannot give an accurate representation of the entire gut biofilm. A model of the gut biofilm in vitro will allow scientists to systematically study the bacterial interactions that are key to comprehending our digestive system. Previous methods for constructing laboratory biofilm include using a drip flow biofilm reactor (Figure 1), in which a thin film of bacteria is maintained by a steady drip of nutrients flowing over the slide of biofilm with waste elimination on the other side. However, this device is limited in its ability to study bacterial interactions of a biofilm, because it focuses on a single type of immobile bacteria with limited potential for growth. Replication of the gut requires multiple species of bacteria, along with specific conditions concerning the pH, temperature, and flow of nutrients. Objectives There are many variables concerning the homeostasis of the gut biofilm, including individual dietary factors and unattainable bacterial diversity that makes the gut difficult to exactly replicate in all its complexity. To overcome the “winner takes all” phenomenon, we seek to make our own device consisting of multiple species of bacteria, with specific environmental conditions that mimic that of the gut. For our own model, we will focus primarily on the chemical communication that occurs between the bacteria, the most significant factor for the success of the gut ecosystem. We hypothesize that an environment mimicking that of our gut will be the most successful in growing a stable biofilm. 4 Holzapfel, 86. 5 Hooper, Lora and Gordon, Jeffrey. “Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut.” Science Magazine, Volume 292, 2001. 6 Kim HJ, Boedicker JQ, Choi JW, Ismagilov RF. “Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community.” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18 188–18 193. 2008.
  • 3. Figure 1: Drip Flow Biofilm Reactor. The biofilm is grown on the substratum, while food is entered through the inlet and waste is eliminated through the effluent outlet. Source: (Coenye, Tom and Hans Nelis, “In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formation,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, Volume 83, 89-105,2010. ) Approach I. The Device To overcome this challenge, we plan to incorporate some of the known techniques in biotechnology, specifically the drip flow biofilm reactor (Figure 1) and 3D printing (Figure 2), into our own biofilm model. However, we can build upon them to represent the dynamics of a gut biofilm, including multiple species of bacteria, an efficient nutrient delivery and waste removal system, and a way to arrange the bacteria for optimal living conditions. After building our device, our goal is to sustain the survival of the different bacteria species for as long as possible by experimenting with dynamic conditions and discovering the combination that will optimize the bacteria lifetime length. The spatial arrangement of the bacteria in the biofilm plays an important role in their social behavior in terms of reproduction and mobility in a cooperative relationship. Using a recent microscopic 3D printing method (Figure 2), we will construct a bacterial community that allows for the organization of multiple populations of bacteria in a geometric arrangement with each colony 200 micrometers apart. This separates the two bacterial species just enough to avoid competition for nutrients, while still allowing them to communicate using quorum sensing signals.7 This is important for it allows for the cooperation between species that exists within the gut to be replicated, while avoiding the “winner takes all” phenomenon that exists in previous in vitro models. In this manner, we can arrange the bacteria in adjacent or nested colonies, held in place by a highly porous, cross-linked gelatin material, to mimic the biofilm structure of the gut. In this shared microenvironment, the bacteria will be suspended within the set gel while still being able to communicate with each other through the porous material. While this departs from an exact model of 7 Connel, Jodi et al. “3D Printing of Microscopic Bacterial Communities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Vol. 110, 2013, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309729110. Figure 2: These are the steps taken to create the enclosed cell structure in our biofilm reactor.(Source: Connel5 )
  • 4. the gut biofilm, it preserves the chemical interconnectivity between the bacteria, an important factor for biofilm formation through bacteria working in harmony 8. The two bacterial species we will choose are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (Figure 4). Both strains have been studied in-depth by scientists for their presence in the gut and probiotic properties. We will engineer the bacteria with strains of pGLO, which will give us an easy indicator of the colony size, number, and growth. To print the bacteria onto the porous surface, we will mix the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium with a fabrication precursor containing mucin instead of gelatin to better emulate the gut. This cellular suspension will be moved to a sterile well to be cooled, resulting in a gelled matrix. The geometric configurations are fabricated around one or more bacteria by scanning a highly focused pulsed laser beam in three dimensions. We will design a computer model of the bacterial colonies’ spatial orientations of the 200 microns distances between each colony forming unit, and the technology will follow this plan with sub-micrometer 3D resolution, creating an artificial biofilm that will mimic the gut on a small-scale. In order to preserve the realistic conditions of the gut, we will control the pH level and temperature to mirror that of the human body’s. Our gut (Figure 3) will be molded using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). PDMS is a commonly used silicon-based polymer that is clear, non-toxic, and resistant to strong acids and bases9. This is ideal because even though this portion of the model will not come in contact with bacteria directly, it needs to be able to withstand strong acid that simulates the fluid in the gut. The mold has two levels: an upper, cylindrical area where the bacteria and the mucin layer are, and a lower cavity that allows for the flow of simple sugars, yeast extract, and proteins as nutrients for the growing bacteria. On top of the half-pipe will be a coverslip, through which we can observe the growth of the biofilm. The structure resembles a half pipe to simulate the tubes of the small intestine, specifically the duodenum, and to eliminate corners in which bacteria can aggregate. The mucin layer and the cavity will be exposed to one another through the pores, through which nutrients, as well as control factors such as acids and bases, can diffuse upwards to the bacteria. The bacteria continuously communicate via quorum sensing by sending chemical messages through the pores (Figure 3). 8 Kim HJ, Boedicker JQ, Choi JW, Ismagilov RF. “Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community.” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18 188–18 193. 2008. 9 Lotters, J. C, "The mechanical properties of the rubber elastic polymer polydimethylsiloxane for sensor applications" Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 147-153. 2007 Figure 3: Our model of the gut. It will have a ultraviolet light on the top to reveal the glow of the recombinant bacteria, a porous layer that allows the bacteria to communicate with each other, and a cavity through which food, mucin, and waste can flow through and diffuse either way.
  • 5. II. Experiments We will overcome the “winner takes all” phenomenon by both limiting mobility via the mucin layer and forcing the bacteria to rely on each other by imposing harsh conditions in which no single species of bacteria can survive alone. We will exploit the fact that bacteria in biofilm have greater resistance to harsher conditions than planktonic bacteria. By mirroring such conditions like those in the gut, we expose the bacteria to the same unsympathetic environment that they are used to surviving and thriving in by working in harmony with the bacteria group. The bacteria will be used to assess the effectiveness of our in vitro biofilm model in mimicking these conditions of the gut. Colony growth will be measured by counting the fluorescent colonies of pGLO modified bacteria with the UV light built into our device (Figure 3). An increase in the amount of colonies of both the Lactobacillus and the Bifidobacteria will indicate a successful biofilm, capable of housing and accommodating growth. Our hypothesis states that the optimal conditions for culturing the bacteria are those that mimic the harsh habitat of the gut to the closest extent. Once our biofilm model is tested successfully for growing multi-species ecosystems, we want to test this hypothesis by changing various environmental factors and observing the colony in response to each adjustment. We can experiment by increasing and decreasing specific variables to observe how the bacteria act as in response. For each experiment, the bacteria will be counted using the same GFP method, so that we can discover the optimal conditions and evaluate our hypothesis accordingly. First, the pH of the system can be adjusted using the bottom cavity, which we will use as our primary control system. High concentrations of hydrochloric acid (HCl) will flow in the lower cavity and diffuse upwards to the bacteria, lowering the pH. If the solution becomes too acidic, we can flow a basic solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to neutralize some of the acid. We will experiment with various ranges of pH and observe the degree to which the bacteria are able to survive under certain chemical circumstances. The ideal pH is known to be between 2.5 and 3.5. Thus, we will start at 3.5, record the growth, and gradually lower it. This will reveal the optimal pH for the growth of both Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. We will maintain a constant external temperature of 37°C, the average temperature of the human gut, to ensure the accurate replication of the gut environment with the first few trials. Similarly to the pH modification, we can adjust the temperature in the biofilm to see how the bacteria react to the change in a favorable or unfavorable manner. For example, under cold temperatures, we expect to see that the bacteria will grow very slowly due to slower rate of molecular motion and biological reaction10. We will first change the temperature up and down by increments 5°C order to observe the effects and possible growth trends. 10 Erdal, Ufuk G. and Randall, Clifford W. “Thermal Adaptation of Bacteria to Cold Temperatures in an EBPR System.” Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Figure 4: Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Each as applications in probiotics and are found in a human gut Source: (Weiner, Melinda. "A Cultured Response to HIV." Nature Medicine. Nature, 2009.Web. 17 July 2014,Holm, Carl. "Scientists Unravel Probiotics Gut Defence › News in Science (ABC Science)." ABC Science. ABC, 27 Jan. 2011.Web. 17 July 2014.)
  • 6. Lastly, we will conduct an experiment with increasing and decreasing amount of nutrients provided so we can see whether competition over these nutrients arises. We plan to flow simple sugars, which are easiest to break down in the digestive system. Using the UV light to observe the growth of colonies, we will be able to determine the optimal amount of nutrients to provide our bacteria to ensure a prolonged period of growth. If one grows quicker than the other, it would show one species dominating the other. To avoid this scenario, we will adjust the kind of nutrients we provide the bacteria, preventing the “winner takes all” phenomenon to occurring, ensuring our bionic gut’s success. Ultimately, we will find the best combination of all of these factors to see whether they line up with the conditions of the gut, therefore verifying our original hypothesis. Significance We present this model as a proof of concept. The actual human gut has a myriad of factors that our current model does not take into account: for instance, salt balance and the thousands of other bacteria we must include. If this method of cultivating gut flora on a microscale with only two different strains of bacteria works, we can expand it to encompass more different strains of bacteria, eventually culminating to the cultivation of the entire microbiota of the gut, as well as the more complex systems of the gut. When completed, pharmaceutical companies can use our model to test the effects of drugs on gut biota, without resorting to human subjects that can be both expensive and risky. Moreover, doctors can use the model for individualized diagnosis. The gut of a single patient can be replicated in vitro by adjusting the model to their specific pH and bacterial-composition. Testing drugs and treatments on the bionic gut allows the doctor to observe whether or not their treatment kills gut biota, prompting them to adjust their dosages accordingly, avoiding ineffective treatment and patient injury. Additionally, an in vitro model of the gut will allow us to study bacteria that have never been cultured before because of their interdependence on others in the gut flora11. We will eventually be able to culture those bacteria outside of a living person and systematically study all of the bacteria of the gut. 10 State University, 2002. 11 Flint, Harry J., Paul W. O'Toole, and Alan W. Walker. "The Human Intestinal Microbiota." Microbiology 156 (2010): 3203-204. Web.