1. BVSWMA, Inc.
FY 2013 Budget

2. What is BVSWMA, Inc.
BVSWMA, Inc. is a non-profit local government
corporation founded in 2010 to provide region-wide
solid waste disposal through the operation of the Twin
Oaks Landfill and the Twin Oaks Compost facility

3. Governance & Funding
 7 Member Board of Directors includes representatives
from both City’s
 Rock Prairie Road Closure and 30 year post-closure care
costs funded with existing reserves
 Twin Oaks Landfill operating, construction, closure and 30
year post-closure costs funded through tipping fees

4. Landfill Revenues
 FY 2013 Revenue Budget: $6,452,625
 ~$100,000 less revenue than approved FY 2012 budget
 Landfill Revenues are driven primarily by landfill volumes
 Lost customer to lower rates offered in the Austin market
 No rate increases

5. Operating Expense
 FY 2013 Operating Expense Budget: $4,851,160
 ~$638,000 lower operating expense than approved FY
2012 budget
 Continuing to make adjustments to operations when
possible to offset decline in volume

6. Capital Expense
 FY 2012 Capital Expense Budget: $4,510,000
 $2,000,000 – Twin Oaks Cell 2A-1
 $1,525,000 – Rock Prairie Closure & Post Closure
 $505,000 - Equipment maintenance/replacement
 950 wheel loader replacement
 Mechanic truck
 $430,000 Debt Service
 $50,000 – Compost bagger
 Allows bagging of compost & mulch material

7. Total Expense
 FY 2012 Total Expense Budget: $9,316,160
 $4,851,160 - Operating expense
 $4,510,000 – Capital expense

8. Reserve Draw Down
 Rock Prairie Closure funded
during operating life of this facility
 Twin Oaks Cell 2A-1 will yield
more airspace per constructed
acre than Cell 1
 Future cells will continue to yield
an improved ratio of airspace per
constructed acre
Cell 1 Cell 2 Future
Cells

9. BVSWMA, Inc.
2011-2012
Annual Report

10. Performance Measures &
Benchmarks
 100% Compliance with State & Federal Regulations
 Revenue
 $6,654,373 projected vs. $6,559,750 budget
 Total Expenses
 $10,742,116 projected vs. $11,063,969 budget
 Landfill Tonnage
 275,400 projected vs. 283,000 budget
 Projected tonnage from City’s ~12,000 less than budget
 Projected 3rd party tonnage ~4,500 more than budget

11. Long & Short Term Waste Stream
 Short term
 Low landfill prices in Austin are resulting in a short-
term volume decline
 Long term
 Additional facilities in the market area are pursuing
landfill permits

12. Anticipated new customers &
goals
 Retention of existing customer base
 Replacement of volume lost to competing
facilities

13. Compaction Goals
 Compaction not primary concern while placing first lift
 Conservative density of 1,500 pounds per cubic yard
assumed for initial budget model
 Maximizing density will be a long term goal
 Heavy equipment in good condition
 Leachate recirculation
 GPS based technology

14. Capacity & Life Expectancy
 Design capacity: 37,000,000 cubic yards
 27,750,000 tons tons of total capacity assuming a density
of 1,500 pounds per cubic yard/cy density
 ~27,404,600 tons capacity remaining at the end of current
fiscal year
 Current annual volume: ~275,500 tons per year
 Current site-life estimate: 99 years

15. Short & Long term compost
outlook
 Short term
 Maintain existing operation
 Long term
 Relocate compost facility to Twin Oaks

16. Waste Diversion Strategies
 Continue current practices
 Divert brush & yard waste
 Metals & white goods
collected for recycling
 Tires collected for beneficial
use
 Continue evaluation of waste diversion practices that
are successful in other markets

17. Household Hazardous
Waste Collection
 Spring & Fall Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
 More that 2,200 participants at the spring 2012 event
 Continues to grow each year
 Funded through solid waste tipping fees
 Multi-Agency event - held in cooperation with
 City of Bryan
 City of College Station
 Brazos County Sheriff’s Department
 Texas A&M University