Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Charles River Pollution Control District - Presentation 2/5/09

1,769 views

Published on

The presentation by the Charles River Pollution Control District to the Franklin (MA) Town Council on 2/5/09. The presentation provides an overview on the capital improvement plan, the reasons why it is needed, and the budget required to support it.

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Charles River Pollution Control District - Presentation 2/5/09

  1. 1. Charles River Pollution Control District 2010 Budget 15-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) February 2009
  2. 2. District Wastewater Treatment Facilities
  3. 3. District Wastewater Treatment Facilities <ul><li>Average daily flow to plant about 4.5 million gallons per day (mgd) </li></ul><ul><li>Peak days double or even triple </li></ul><ul><li>220 miles of sewer lines contribute to plant </li></ul><ul><li>Seven communities contributing flow </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Franklin ~ 3.1 mgd </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Medway ~ 0.8 mgd </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Millis ~ 0.3 mgd and Bellingham ~ 0.3 mgd </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Norfolk, Dover and Sherborn < 50,000 gpd as septage </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. District Budget <ul><li>Significant budget increases for 2010 due to: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Capital projects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Salaries and benefits </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Chemical costs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Maintenance costs </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2011 through 2016 projected budget to be within Proposition 2.5 % </li></ul>
  5. 5. Requested District Increase Over Prop 2.5 <ul><li>FY 2009 budget (O&M and capital) </li></ul><ul><li>2.5 % Increase </li></ul><ul><li>Sewer connections (CY 08) </li></ul><ul><li> Subtotal: </li></ul><ul><li>FY 2010 proposed budget </li></ul><ul><ul><li> Difference : </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>* does not include 2.5% increase and sewer connections from CY08  </li></ul></ul>$3,123,400 (+) $78,100 (+) $16,100 $3,217,600 $3,707,600 $490,000
  6. 6. Franklin FY 10 Assessment <ul><li>68.2 % O&M wastewater assessment </li></ul><ul><li>67.0 % capital wastewater assessment </li></ul><ul><li>Total expected 2010 budget share: $2,523,740 </li></ul><ul><li>FY 09 Budget: $2,078,170 </li></ul><ul><li>Difference: $ 445,570 </li></ul>
  7. 7. Purpose of 15-Year CIP <ul><li>Required improvements to maintain compliance with Federal and State Permits </li></ul><ul><li>Improvements necessary to keep plant operating at current capacity </li></ul><ul><li>Equipment replacement expected after ~20 yrs operation to keep the facility in good condition </li></ul><ul><li>Plan necessary expenditures and schedule for implementation </li></ul>
  8. 8. Major Components of CIP <ul><li>National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit compliance </li></ul><ul><li>Landfill closure </li></ul><ul><li>Plant process/mechanical improvements </li></ul><ul><li>Facility improvements </li></ul>
  9. 9. District’s I/I Requirements <ul><li>Map and description of inspection and maintenance activities/expenditures </li></ul><ul><li>Map of areas for inspection and maintenance activities </li></ul><ul><li>Calculation of annual average I/I and maximum month for previous year </li></ul><ul><li>Report of I/I-related corrective actions, including unauthorized discharges </li></ul>
  10. 10. Landfill Closure <ul><li>Existing Landfill </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Located adjacent to plant, near parking lot, chlorine building and outfall </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2.5 acres </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1979 to 1989 dewatered sludge, grit and screenings </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1989 to 2002 only grit and screenings </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Closed since 2005 </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Process/Mechanical Improvements <ul><li>System for washing and compacting screenings </li></ul><ul><li>Improved septage receiving facilities </li></ul><ul><li>Clarifier mechanism replacement </li></ul><ul><li>Conversion from gaseous chlorine to sodium hypochlorite </li></ul>
  12. 12. Facility Improvements <ul><li>Brickwork: repair and replace </li></ul><ul><li>Roofs: replace plywood underboards, recoat metal </li></ul><ul><li>Exterior doors: replace as needed </li></ul><ul><li>Windows: reseal and weather-strip </li></ul><ul><li>Exterior walkways and platforms: replace bricks where needed, refinish concrete </li></ul><ul><li>Lime silo: recoat </li></ul>
  13. 13. Estimated Total Cost of CIP <ul><li>NPDES permit compliance </li></ul><ul><li>Landfill closure </li></ul><ul><li>Plant improvements </li></ul><ul><li>Facility improvements </li></ul><ul><li> Total: </li></ul><ul><li>*Note: all figures are escalated costs, with construction planned between 2010 and 2014 </li></ul>$7.1 million $1.9 million $8.6 million $1.8 million $ 19.4 million
  14. 14. Expected Total Debt Service <ul><li>2011 – 2012: permitting and design </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Interest on short term loan (short term borrowing) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2013 – 2014: design complete, construction underway </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Interest on short term loan (~$ 150,000 per year) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2015 – 2034: all 15-year CIP construction complete </li></ul><ul><ul><li>General obligation bond at 5% (~$ 1.55 million per year) </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. Member Community Assessment <ul><li>Franklin </li></ul><ul><li>Medway </li></ul><ul><li>Bellingham </li></ul><ul><li>Millis </li></ul><ul><li>Norfolk </li></ul><ul><li>Dover </li></ul><ul><li>Sherborn </li></ul><ul><li>* All percentages based on total reserved capacity per community (total plant 5.7 mgd) </li></ul>67.50 % 16.75 % 5.25 % 8.75 % 0.85 % 0.45 % 0.45 %
  16. 16. Franklin Community Debt Service <ul><li>67.5 % assessment of plant capacity </li></ul><ul><li>2013 and 2014: $ 102,000 per year </li></ul><ul><li>2015 through 2034: $1,050,000 per year </li></ul>
  17. 17. Questions?

×