The document summarizes research on the skin of minke whales and compares it to humpback whale skin. Histological analysis found that the minke whale epidermis has a thinner stratum corneum layer composed of loosely bonded "mica-like" cells compared to other cetaceans. This loose structure may act as an anti-fouling mechanism and help explain why suction-cup tags more easily detach from minke whales. The researcher aims to further characterize the skin's unique matrix and identify mechanisms allowing the "mica sheets" to slide past each other with lubrication, informing improved tag designs.
1. Investigations on the skin of the
minke whale (Balaenoptera
acutorostrata, Lacépède, 1804)
With comparisons to the skin of the
humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeangliae, Borowski, 1781)
Christopher J. Hinchcliffe
Section for Aquatic Biology and Toxicology,
Dept. of Biosciences
June 2015
2. Minke whales
Slippery little suckers
Christopher J. Hinchcliffe
Section for Aquatic Biology and Toxicology,
Dept. of Biosciences
June 2015
3. Contents
• Introduction
– Tagging
– Skin (Epidermis)
– Topic species
– Hypothesis and
Objectives
• Materials and Methods
– Sampling
– Histological preparations
• Results
– Macroscopic observations
– Histological investigation
• Discussion
– Comparisons with other
cetaceans
– Implications for tagging
• Conclusions
– Hypothesis and goals
revisited
– Moving forward
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
3
4. Introduction
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
4
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Tagging
• Development
• Use
5. Beginnings
• Mark – recapture
– Scammon (1874)
• whaling tools
– Brown (1971)
• “Discovery tags”
• However: only two
known geographic points
– Range
– Stock ID
• PhotoID is a modern
equivalent
Scammon 1874
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
5
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
6. Radio tag evolution
2.
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
6
Mate et al (2007)
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
7. On-board instruments
• Devices currently being used on VHF tags
– GPS
– Time / depth recorders
– Thermometer
– Hydrophones
– Accelerometer
– Magnetometer
– Film
– Echo sounders!
Johnson et al 2009
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
7
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
8. Data collection
Friedlaender et al (2013)Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
8
Kvadsheim et al 2011
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
9. 3S Project
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
9
Blue = silent run; green = sonar; magenta = killer whale playback
Kvadsheim et al 2011
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
10. 3S Project
• Suction-cup retention impeded by
"...transparent gelatinous material from the
skin of the [minke] whale..."
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
10
Kvadsheim et al (2011)
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
11. Introduction
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
11
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Skin
Epidermis Dermis
12. Epidermis
• Terrestrial epidermis
– Four to five strata
– Cornified
– “Bricks and Mortar”
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
12
1
2
3
4
D
dp
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
13. Epidermis
• Cetacean skin
– Three strata
– Parakeratotic
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
13
l
d mo
1
3
4
dp
D
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Arrangement of cells in the stratum corneum
14. Introduction
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
14
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Topic Species
15. Species
• Common minke whale, Vågehval. (Balaenoptera
acutorostrata, Lacépède, 1804)
– Small baleen whale:
10 m and 10 t
– Northern hemisphere (dwarf form in southern
hemisphere)
– Few tagging studies (all recent and implant tags)
– Hunted by Norway, Iceland and Japan*
– Has exhibited negative responses to anthropogenic
noise
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
15
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
16. Species
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
16
Martin et al 2015
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
17. Species
• Humpback whale, Knølhval.
(Megaptera novaeangliae, Borowski, 1781)
– Medium sized
baleen whale
– Cosmopolitan – separate stocks
– Showed little response during 3S
– Heavily studied
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
17
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
18. Hypothesis
• Compared to other whales, the epidermis of
minke whales is composed of:
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
18
• structurally different cells; or
• strata of abnormal thicknesses; or
• stratum corneum cells which are
bonded to each other differently.
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
19. Objectives
1. Describe the structure of the skin of minke and
humpback whales on macroscopic scale.
2. Describe fine scale structure of the same skin
samples with the aid of staining of thin-sections
and light microscopy.
3. Compare the epidermal structure of the two species
to earlier descriptions of cetacean skin with specific
emphasis on the superficial stratum.
4. Suggest possible revisions for the suction-cup tag
attachments.
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
19
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
21. Sampling
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
21
Minke whales
– Vestfjord May/July 2013
Humpbacks
– Troms Nov/Dec 2014
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
22. Sampling
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
22
Minke whales
– Vestfjord May/July 2013
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
23. Sampling
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
23
Humpbacks
– Troms Nov/Dec 2014
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Kleivane et al (in prep)
24. Materials and methods
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
24
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Histological
preparation
27. Results
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
27
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Macroscopic
observations
28. Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
28
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Loose, fragile skin
29. Parasites
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
29
a. b.
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
30. Parasites
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
30
a. b.
c. d.
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
31. Results
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
31
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Histological
examination
32. Acetic-orcein
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
33
Minke whale Humpback whale
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
34. Thicknesses
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
35
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
n = 5 n = 5
n = 5 n = 5
35. Discussion
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
36
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
• Comparisons with other cetaceans
• Offer a new analogy
• Implications for tagging
36. Other cetaceans
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
37
Other cetaceans
Minkes (this study)
Minke (Sokolov 1982)
Humpbacks (this study)+
n = 11 n = 10 n = 10
mm
%ofepidermalthickness
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
mm
37. Touch-down
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
38
Cetaceans (general)
Minke whale
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
39. Comparisons with micas
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
40
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Mica = Glimmer
40. Anti-fouling
• Pilot whales
– biogel
• Minke whales - a novel anti-fouling mechanism?
– Sacrificial stratum corneum (“mica sheets”)
– Intercellular lipids (“lubricant”)
– -> “Mica + lubricant” = novel method of fouling
prevention
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
41
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
42. Revised suction cup
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
43
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
Solutions already exist…
43. Objectives
1. Describe the structure of the skin of minke and
humpback whales on macroscopic scale.
2. Describe fine scale structure of the same skin
samples with the aid of staining of thin-sections
and light microscopy.
3. Compare the epidermal structure of the two species
to earlier descriptions of cetacean skin with
specific emphasis on the superficial stratum.
4. Suggest possible revisions for the suction-cup tag
attachments.
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
44
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
44. Hypothesis
• Compared to other whales, the epidermis of
minke whales is composed of:
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
45
1) structurally different cells;
2) strata of abnormal thicknesses;
3) stratum corneum cells which are
bonded to each other differently.
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
45. My next steps
• Intercellular matrix constituents
– Confirm slippery intercellular cocktail
• Other cell cohesion
mechanisms
(eg. desmosomes)
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
46
l
d
mo
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
46. My next steps
• Develop revised suction-cup further
– Anthropogenic noise pollution effects
– Interspecies interactions
• Identify epibiotic community on minke and
humpback whale
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
47
Introduction Materials and Methods DiscussionResults Conclusion
47. Thank you!!
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
48
Karl Inne Ugland Morten M. Laane Wenche Eikrem Lars Kleivane
And all my family and friends!
My supervisors…
48. Bibliography
• Dyce, K. M., W. O. Sack and C. J. G. Wensing (1996). “The Common Integument”. In: Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy (Second edition).
Edited by K. M. Dyce, W. O. Sack and C. J. G. Wensing. Philadelphia: Saunders. Chapter 10, pages 349–366.
• Friedlaender et al (2013). "Extreme diel variation in the feeding behavior of humpback whales along the western Antarctic Peninsula
during autumn.” In: Marine Ecology Progress Series 494: 281-289.
• Kleivane, L., P. Kvadsheim, N. Øien, A. Bocconcelli, P. Miller, R. Kristensen, and A. Johannessen. Tagging and tracking whales - Research
tools for better field performance: The whale tag launcher ARTS and the DFHorten direction finder.
• Kvadsheim, P., F.-P. Lam, P. Miller, L. Doksæter, F. Visser, L. Kleivane, S. van Ijsselmuide, F. Samarra, P. Wensveen, C. Curé, L. Hickmott,
and R. Dekeling. 2011. Behavioural responses of cetaceans to naval sonar signals in Norwegian waters – the 3S-2011 cruise report. FFI-
rapport 2011/01289, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment.
• Martin, S. W., C. R. Martin, B. M. Matsuyama and E. E. Henderson (2015). "Minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) respond to navy
training." The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137(5): 2533-2541.
• Mate, B., R. Mesecar, and B. Lagerquist. 2007. The evolution of satellite-monitored radio tags for large whales: One laboratory's
experience. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 54:224-247.
• Menon, G. K., S. Grayson, B. E. Brown, and P. M. Elias. 1986. Lipokeratinocytes of the epidermis of a cetacean (Phocena phocena) -
Histochemistry, ultrastructure, and lipid-composition. Cell and Tissue Research 244:385-394.
Investigations on the skin of the minke
whale
49
Initial models were implants
Pictured tag gave 89 day tag in 1979/80
Suction cup attachments developed by J. Goodyear in early ’80s
Slow uptake initially – Researchers preferred implant tags up until mid ’90s
Simple technology – car roof rack suction cups
Record attachment is 78 hours
VERY USEFUL
- And only becoming moreso
Given the DETAILED data collected very useful in MONITORING behavioural responses to stressors eg SONAR, SEISMIC
Dermis and Epidermis
Two Layers EPIDERMIS and DERMIS
McIntyre Review – 0 of 51
MAY 2015
McIntyre: 11 of 51
Chosen as a comparison due to TAGABILITY and ACCESS
Reports from 3S (via LARS) and pilot investigations lead to the hypothesis
MINKE WHALES – joined whaling boat
HUMPBACK WHALES
AIR ROCKET TRANSMITTER SYSTEM
Sampling differences may have caused issues…. Will come back to this
Back in the lab
PREPARE samples for SECTIONING
CONCENTRATE on STRATUM CORNEUM!
STRINGY
MELANOSOMES
Parakeratotic
MELANOSOMES
CELL-SHAPE
Stratum corneum CLEARLY thicker
What happens at suction-cup touchdown
Bricks and mortar + observations -> MICA
Water in-between sheets of mica can cause slippage
BAUM – gel derived from INTERCELLULAR LIPIDS and contains ENZYMES that WEAKEN biofouler attachment.
The MICA SHEETS are LUBRICATED by INTERCELLUAR LIPIDS
Tags can be see as a large, superficially attaching epibiont (fouler)
1 Main differences:
Thicker superficial stratum
Thinner, more numerous superficial cell-layers
Superficial layers separated from each other easily
2
Novel anti-fouling mechanism
New tag attachment suggested
Further work is also needed to more fully understand the exact mechanisms by which the unusual stratum corneum of minke whales prevents tag adhesion.