1. Rev 2/19/2016
PADR INSTRUCTOR PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION
PART I BASIC INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION:
Employee Name: Term of Evaluation:
Date of Classroom Observation: Responsible Department: SOAR-PADR
PART II PERFORMANCE RATING BY JOB FUNCTION:
1 - Unsatisfactory 4 - Exceeds Expectations
2 - Does Not Meet All Expectations 5 - Significantly Exceeds Expectations
3 - Meets All Expectations
1. Upholds PADR Policy and Procedure
2. Follows required assignments
3. Demonstrates control of classroom
4. Adequate use of classroom time
5. Communicates information clearly
6. Utilizes all course material effectively
7. Presents material in an organized, logical fashion
8. Creativity in the classroom
9. Good rapport with students
10. Good rapport with PADR staff
11. Timely and courteous response to all staff requests
12. Attends all necessary meetings
13. Maintains all required information through the Blackboard, etc.
(Syllabus, Assignment / Grade Sheet, Grades in Grade Center, Turnitin
Direct Assignments, etc.)
EVALUATOR’S COMMENTS:
Cameron Skoczlas Spring 2016
4/21/2016
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
Ms. Skoczlas does a wonderful job in the classroom. It is clear she spends ample time preparing for each class
meeting, for the session that was observed Cameron provided helpful handouts about resume and cover letter
construction. Her PADR students seem to enjoy her teaching style and most were focused on her presentation and
writing down helpful website that she recommended. Ms. Skoczlas has clearly worked to provide her PADR
students with all of the resources that will help them find success at Texas Tech University. I regret that Cameron
will not be available to PADR students in future semesters. Thank you for a wonderful job done.

2. Rev 2/19/2016
EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT – Required for any item with a score below 3.0.
INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK – Include any comments of concerns you have with your evaluation. Please
arrange a time to meet with the Unit Supervisor or Assistant Director to review any scores below a 3.0
and to discuss any feedback you wish provide.

3. Rev 2/19/2016
Overall Evaluation:
Unsatisfactory Exceeds Expectations
Does not meet all expectations Significantly Exceeds Expectations
Meets All Expectations
SIGNATURES OF SUPERVISORS
This report is based on my observation and/or knowledge. It represents my best judgment of the
employee's performance.
Employee Signature: _______________________________________ Date: ______________
Evaluator Signature: _______________________________________ Date: ______________
NOTE: Employee signature indicates only that this performance evaluation was reviewed by the
employee and discussed with the evaluator. Disagreement with the evaluation or any items contained
therein should be recorded by instructor and / or evaluator during an arranged meeting. Recorded
information should be kept on file with evaluation, and copies should be made available to the
instructor if requested.
Cameron Skoczlas
Digitally signed by Cameron Skoczlas
DN: cn=Cameron Skoczlas, o, ou,
email=cameron.skoczlas@ttu.edu, c=US
Date: 2016.04.25 09:09:11 -05'00'
4/25/16
4/22/16
3.46